Search

Filesystem vulnerabilities persist as a significant threat to Android systems, despite various proposed defenses and testing techniques. The complexity of program behaviors and access control mechanisms in Android systems makes it challenging to effectively identify these vulnerabilities. In this paper, we present PathSentinel, which overcomes the limitations of previous techniques by combining static program analysis and access control policy analysis to detect three types of filesystem vulnerabilities: path traversals, hijacking vulnerabilities, and luring vulnerabilities. By unifying program and access control policy analysis, PathSentinel identifies attack surfaces accurately and prunes many impractical attacks to generate input payloads for vulnerability testing. To streamline vulnerability validation, PathSentinel leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate targeted exploit code based on the identified vulnerabilities and generated input payloads. The LLMs serve as a tool to reduce the engineering effort required for writing test applications, demonstrating the potential of combining static analysis with LLMs to enhance the efficiency of exploit generation and vulnerability validation. Evaluation on Android 12 and 14 systems from Samsung and OnePlus demonstrates PathSentinel's effectiveness, uncovering 51 previously unknown vulnerabilities among 217 apps with only 2 false positives. These results underscore the importance of combining program and access control policy analysis for accurate vulnerability detection and highlight the promising direction of integrating LLMs for automated exploit generation, providing a comprehensive approach to enhancing the security of Android systems against filesystem vulnerabilities.

Android's filesystem access control is a crucial aspect of its system integrity. It utilizes a combination of mandatory access controls, such as SELinux, and discretionary access controls, like Unix permissions, along with specialized access controls such as Android permissions to safeguard OEM and Android services from third-party applications. However, when OEMs introduce differentiating features, they often create vulnerabilities due to their inability to properly reconfigure this complex policy combination. To address this, we introduce the POLYSCOPE tool, which triages Android filesystem access control policies to identify attack operations - authorized operations that may be exploited by adversaries to elevate their privileges. POLYSCOPE has three significant advantages over prior analyses: it allows for the independent extension and analysis of individual policy models, understands the flexibility untrusted parties have in modifying access control policies, and can identify attack operations that system configurations permit. We demonstrate the effectiveness of POLYSCOPE by examining the impact of Scoped Storage on Android, revealing that it reduces the number of attack operations possible on external storage resources by over 50%. However, because OEMs only partially adopt Scoped Storage, we also uncover two previously unknown vulnerabilities, demonstrating how POLYSCOPE can assess an ideal scenario where all apps comply with Scoped Storage, which can reduce the number of untrusted parties accessing attack operations by over 65% on OEM systems. POLYSCOPE thus helps Android OEMs evaluate complex access control policies to pinpoint the attack operations that require further examination., Comment: 14 pages, 5 figures, submitted to IEEE TDSC. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2008.03593

Android filesystem access control provides a foundation for Android system integrity. Android utilizes a combination of mandatory (e.g., SEAndroid) and discretionary (e.g., UNIX permissions) access control, both to protect the Android platform from Android/OEM services and to protect Android/OEM services from third-party apps. However, OEMs often create vulnerabilities when they introduce market-differentiating features because they err when re-configuring this complex combination of Android policies. In this paper, we propose the PolyScope tool to triage the combination of Android filesystem access control policies to vet releases for vulnerabilities. The PolyScope approach leverages two main insights: (1) adversaries may exploit the coarse granularity of mandatory policies and the flexibility of discretionary policies to increase the permissions available to launch attacks, which we call permission expansion, and (2) system configurations may limit the ways adversaries may use their permissions to launch attacks, motivating computation of attack operations. We apply PolyScope to three Google and five OEM Android releases to compute the attack operations accurately to vet these releases for vulnerabilities, finding that permission expansion increases the permissions available to launch attacks, sometimes by more than 10X, but a significant fraction of these permissions (about 15-20%) are not convertible into attack operations. Using PolyScope, we find two previously unknown vulnerabilities, showing how PolyScope helps OEMs triage the complex combination of access control policies down to attack operations worthy of testing.

Many smartphones now deploy conventional operating systems, so the rootkit attacks so prevalent on desktop and server systems are now a threat to smartphones. While researchers have advocated using virtualization to detect and prevent attacks on operating systems (e.g., VM introspection and trusted virtual domains), virtualization is not practical on smartphone systems due to the lack of virtualization support and/or the expense of virtualization. Current smartphone processors do have hardware support for running a protected environment, such as the ARM TrustZone extensions, but such hardware does not control the operating system operations sufficiently to enable VM introspection. In particular, a conventional operating system running with TrustZone still retains full control of memory management, which a rootkit can use to prevent traps on sensitive instructions or memory accesses necessary for effective introspection. In this paper, we present SPROBES, a novel primitive that enables introspection of operating systems running on ARM TrustZone hardware. Using SPROBES, an introspection mechanism protected by TrustZone can instrument individual operating system instructions of its choice, receiving an unforgeable trap whenever any SPROBE is executed. The key challenge in designing SPROBES is preventing the rootkit from removing them, but we identify a set of five invariants whose enforcement is sufficient to restrict rootkits to execute only approved, SPROBE-injected kernel code. We implemented a proof-of-concept version of SPROBES for the ARM Fast Models emulator, demonstrating that in Linux kernel 2.6.38, only 12 SPROBES are sufficient to enforce all five of these invariants. With SPROBES we show that it is possible to leverage the limited TrustZone extensions to limit conventional kernel execution to approved code comprehensively., Comment: In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Mobile Security Technologies (MoST) 2014 (http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6674)