Search

Background Cardiovascular benefits of aggressive dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with extra risks including bleeding, cancer, and infections discovered first for prasugrel in the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel (TRITON) trial. Ticagrelor in PLATO also caused slightly more infections but surprisingly less sepsis-related deaths (SRD) than clopidogrel. However, verified infection fatalities in PLATO were lacking from the public domain. We obtained the complete Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-issued primary causes death list, matched it with the few local site records dataset and analyzed the patterns of infections and deaths reported in PLATO. Methods Among infections, the FDA spreadsheet contains only two primary death codes for pneumonia (12–2) and SRD (12–8). We obtained local evidence for two pneumonia and two SRD and matched those with the FDA records. We assessed how SRD patterns were reported among nonvascular death's dataset. Results The FDA PLATO records indicate that clopidogrel caused numerically less (n = 8) primary pneumonia deaths than ticagrelor (n = 10) but over three times more SRD (n = 23/7). Among matched verifiable outcomes, both pneumonia deaths were correct, but two clopidogrel SRD were incorrect. Of the remaining 21 clopidogrel SRD, 6 were reported as two separate closed paired entries in Brazil (lines 76 and 78 and 86 and 88) and India (lines 436 and 440), suggesting last minute addition of potentially incorrect SRD reports. Four ticagrelor SRD (lines 24,193,467 and 650) were “compensated” with close or next in line clopidogrel SRD entries (lines 22,195,468 and 651). Conclusion The FDA-issued evidence suggests no benefit of ticagrelor in preventing deaths from infections with slightly more pneumonia deaths, with possible misreporting of SRD in PLATO. These findings require an in-depth precise review of sepsis deaths in this trial.

Bleeding remains a complication during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Some data suggest a link between bleeding and worsened vascular outcomes. However, this association is unclear, due to omitting of minor bleedings when applying conservative scales. In contrast, the Platelet Inhibition and Outcomes (PLATO) trial classification used broad realistic capturing of all bleedings.Access was gained to the Food and Drug Administration-issued adjudication data set on which post hoc analyses of bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death were conducted. Bleeding was defined as minimal, minor, major, and life-threatening or fatal (LTOF) as per the original PLATO scale.Among 18,624 enrollees, 10,705 adjudicated events occurred across 7171 patients. There were 618 minimal, 1412 minor, 1216 major, and 536 LTOF bleedings for the total of 3782 events reported in 3387 patients. There were 938 deaths, 2751 MIs and 359 strokes. The overall bleeding was 20.3%, exhibited in 19.2% patients. Total bleeds were associated with less deaths (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.63) and MI (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.41-0.54; P.001 for both). There were no differences in deaths (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.93-1.34; P = .24), but less MIs (OR: 0.72. 95% CI: 0.59-0.86; P.001), and more strokes (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.64-2.88; P.001) after LTOF. Major, minor, and minimal bleeds were associated with less deaths and MI but not strokes.These large uniformly adjudicated data reveal that within 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy, 1 out of 5 patients experiences bleeding. Overall, bleeding was associated with diminished incidence of death and MI but not strokes.

No abstract present.

Background Excess vascular deaths in the PLATO trial comparing ticagrelor to clopidogrel have been repeatedly challenged by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewers and academia. Based on the Freedom of Information Act, BuzzFeed won a court order and shared with us the complete list of reported deaths for the ticagrelor FDA New Drug Application (NDA) 22-433. This dataset was matched against local patient-level records from PLATO sites monitored by the sponsor. Study question Whether FDA death data in the PLATO trial matched the local site records. Study design The NDA spreadsheet contains 938 precisely detailed PLATO deaths. We obtained and validated local evidence for 52 deaths among 861 PLATO patients from 14 enrolling sites in 8 countries and matched those with the official NDA dataset submitted to the FDA. Measures and outcomes Existence, precise time, and primary cause of deaths in PLATO. Results Discrepant to the NDA document, sites confirmed 2 extra unreported deaths (Poland and Korea) and failed to confirm 4 deaths (Malaysia). Of the remaining 46 deaths, dates were reported correctly for 42 patients, earlier (2 clopidogrel), or later (2 ticagrelor) than the actual occurrence of death. In 12 clopidogrel patients, cause of death was changed to "vascular," whereas 6 NDA ticagrelor "nonvascular" or "unknown" deaths were site-reported as of "vascular" origin. Sudden death was incorrectly reported in 4 clopidogrel patients, but omitted in 4 ticagrelor patients directly affecting the primary efficacy PLATO endpoint. Conclusions Many deaths were inaccurately reported in PLATO favoring ticagrelor. The full extent of mortality misreporting is currently unclear, while especially worrisome is a mismatch in identifying primary death cause. Because all PLATO events are kept in the cloud electronic Medidata Rave capture system, securing the database content, examining the dataset changes or/and repeated entries, identifying potential interference origin, and assessing full magnitude of the problem are warranted.

Background Ivabradine, a heart rate-slowing drug used to treat heart failure and (in Europe) angina, had varying impacts upon cardiovascular events in its 3 large outcome trials. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analyses may explain the reasons for the variability. Methods An FDA reviewer analyzed the raw data from the 3 trials using logistic regressions to assess interactions between ivabradine and other drugs and forest plots to display dose responses. Results Ivabradine in its SHIFT heart failure trial shows a significant interaction with loop diuretics with a beneficial impact upon cardiovascular deaths (odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.87, P = .007). This favorable effect is supported by similar interactions in the other 2 trials (BEAUTIFUL, SIGNIFY) and by a dose response for loop diuretics interacting with ivabradine in the SHIFT and BEAUTIFUL trials. The interaction is not related to heart failure severity. Conclusion Ivabradine used concomitantly with a loop diuretic has a beneficial impact upon cardiovascular death.

BACKGROUND Conventional anticoagulation with warfarin remains the cornerstone strategy for numerous preventive strategies. It is established that Asian patients require lower warfarin doses than Caucasians potentially attributing to the genetic polymorphism (GP) differences. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY The impact of GP on optimal warfarin dose (OWD) in Koreans is unclear when compared with other ethnicities. It is also not well established whether GP linked to OWD in Korean patients to the similar extend as in Chinese, Japanese, and Caucasians. DATA SOURCES Single-center prospective observational study in Koreans, matched with historic cohorts of other ethnicities. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES Clinical characteristics, concomitant medications, OWD, international normalized ratio, and VKORC1, CYP2C9, and CYP4F2 GPs were assessed in consecutive Korean patients. The OWD was defined when patient's international normalized ratio was within target range for at least 3 consecutive times separated by 1 week. We included 133 (mean age 62.6 ± 12.1 years, 49% males) warfarin-treated patients of Korean descend. The mean OWD was 3.30 ± 1.34 (range: 1-9) mg/d. Homozygous wild-type patients required lower OWD (3.1 ± 1.1 mg/d vs. 4.7 ± 1.8 mg/d, P < 0.001) for VKORC1 and higher OWD for both CYP2C9 (3.4 ± 1.3 mg/d vs. 2.3 ± 1.1 mg/d, P = 0.002) and CYP4F2 (3.0 ± 1.2 mg/d vs. 3.4 ± 1.3 mg/d vs. 4.0 ± 1.7 mg/d, P = 0.033) than those carrying heterozygote genes. CONCLUSIONS Korean patients exhibit different VKORC1, CYP2C9, and CYP4F2 profiles impacting lower OWD in Eastern Asians than required in Caucasians. Universal international OWD guidelines may consider patient ethnicity as a confounder; however, this hypothesis needs further clarification.

The potential link between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants with excess cancer deaths (CD) was reported first for prasugrel (TRITON, DAPT), clopidogrel (DAPT), vorapaxar (TRACER), apixaban (APPRAISE-2), and later ticagrelor (PEGASUS). However, verified CD in the ticagrelor indication-seeking PLATO were not public. We obtained the complete list of deaths and their primary causes in PLATO, matched that dataset against local site records, and analyzed the patterns of CD reporting. The FDA-issued spreadsheet contains 31 precisely detailed CD (PLATO code 12-3). We obtained local site evidence for four CD and matched them with FDA-reported. We also assessed the patterns of how CD were reported among non-vascular death database column “S” by scrolling the FDA Excel file down among 938 PLATO entries. Clopidogrel CD (n = 17) were reported exclusively by sponsor, while independent CRO’s reported only ticagrelor CD (3 out of 14 PLATO total). Among four matched verified outcomes, one ticagrelor CD was correct, second ticagrelor CD was unreported, and two (ticagrelor and clopidogrel) CD were reported inaccurately. Of the remaining 16 clopidogrel CD six were reported as three separate next in line paired entries in Denmark (236–237), Poland (597–598), Romania (679–680), and as two more fatalities in South Africa (786) and Spain (789), while patients 787 and 788 received ticagrelor out of 938 records suggesting possible late addition of incorrect clopidogrel CD reports. We conclude that some CD were misreported in PLATO, favoring ticagrelor. Such mismatch may require reevaluation of this critical outcome in the trial focusing on the exact death cause reported by site investigators.

Some patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can still exhibit heightened residual platelet reactivity (HRPR), which is potentially linked to adverse vascular outcomes. Better tailored DAPT strategies are needed to address this medical need. Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of guided DAPT with clopidogrel or ticagrelor in addition to aspirin when using VerifyNow P2Y12 testing in post-ACS patients. Methods: The costs were calculated per 1,000 patients aged >55 years. It was assumed that all patients received either generic clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 1 year, and underwent VerifyNow P2Y12 assay testing before DAPT maintenance. Results: Guided DAPT will prevent five more MIs and six more deaths per 1,000 patients than a standard prescription of generic clopidogrel. The total predictive value of costs per patient is 32% lower if a guided strategy is used than if ticagrelor is given to all patients. Conclusion: Assessment of heightened residual platelet reactivity with P2Y12 assay in triaging DAPT post-ACS patients for 1 year is a cost-effective strategy that would reduce financial burden compared to routine administration of more expensive antiplatelet agents.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with heart failure (HF) are treated with warfarin or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Randomized outcome-driven comparisons of different anticoagulant strategies in HF are lacking. Data from international, government-mandated registries may be useful in understanding the real-life use of various anticoagulants and how they are linked to outcomes.STUDY QUESTION: To assess 2015 annual all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke rates co-reported for warfarin and NOACs in subjects with and without HF in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.STUDY DESIGN: We extracted and examined outcome cases in subjects with HF and on warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban and stratified these according to anticoagulants.MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Annual all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke in FAERS.ANALYSIS METHOD: Odds ratio (OR) and χ(Equation is included in full-text article.)for oral anticoagulants from FAERS with and without HF among complete primary reports issued in 2015.RESULTS: FAERS reported 137,026 HF cases, with death co-reported in 42,942 (31.3%). In total, 11,278 (8.2%) HF patients were treated with anticoagulants, with more prescribed warfarin (n = 8260) than all NOACs combined (n = 3018). Very few reports for edoxaban were available. Warfarin consistently displayed a signal for excess adverse events compared to NOACs: OR (95% confidence interval) for the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were 1.91 (1.76-2.07) versus apixaban, 1.92 (1.81-2.03) versus dabigatran, 4.09 (3.38-4.37) versus rivaroxaban, and 2.64 (2.53-2.76) versus all NOACs combined (all P < 0.001). Warfarin, compared to all NOACs combined, demonstrated higher rates of all-cause mortality [OR = 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 2.49-2.90)], myocardial infarction [5.30 (4.17-6.74)], stroke [OR = 8.85 (6.61-11.84)], and ischemic stroke [OR = 12.73 (8.87-18.27); all P < 0.001].CONCLUSIONS: Annual 2015 FAERS profiles in HF patients reveal that warfarin was numerically dominant. Warfarin was associated with higher risk of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared to NOACs. These observational data provide real-world insight into a potential safety benefit of NOACs over warfarin in the setting of HF.

BACKGROUND Tegaserod, a serotonin (5-HT4) agonist initially approved for constipation but withdrawn from use in 2007 because of concerns about cardiovascular adverse effects, was resubmitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 for use in a restricted population. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY Despite an 18-year regulatory history, there remain pharmacology and clinical trial concerns that have not been addressed but are critical for proper assessment of the drug safety and efficacy profile. SOURCES Original FDA reviews, FDA and developer advisory committee briefing documents, and published literature. RESULTS The major pharmacology concern is that the fate and effects of half of the molecule, the pentylaminoguanidine moiety, are unknown. There is evidence that pentylaminoguanidine may contribute to both efficacy and safety. There are other metabolites that are poorly characterized, and potential receptor interactions that suggest cardiovascular effects are possible. The major clinical trial concern is that, while the trial data support a low but definite cardiovascular risk, both subject follow-up and cardiovascular event descriptions were incomplete such that an accurate estimate of cardiovascular risk is not possible. CONCLUSIONS The uncertainties and lack of reliable evidence regarding tegaserod metabolism and cardiovascular risk estimates may discourage clinical use. Signals for cardiovascular toxicity in typical drug development programs are subtle and must be pursued aggressively, with complete case follow-up and cardiovascular event capture in the clinical trials.

PURPOSE The FDA-issued PLATO trial dataset revealed that some primary death causes (PDCs) were inaccurately reported favouring ticagrelor. However, the PLATO Investigators operated the shorter death list of uncertain quality. We compared if PDC match when trial fatalities were reported to the FDA and by the PLATO Investigators. METHOD The FDA list contains precisely detailed 938 PLATO deaths, while shorter investigators dataset consists of 905 deaths. We matched four vascular (sudden, post-MI, heart failure and stroke), and three non-vascular (cancer, sepsis and suicide) PDC between death lists. RESULTS There were more sudden deaths in the shorter list than in the FDA dataset (161 vs 138; P

Objectives To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of rosiglitazone treatment on cardiovascular risk and mortality using multiple data sources and varying analytical approaches with three aims in mind: to clarify uncertainties about the cardiovascular risk of rosiglitazone; to determine whether different analytical approaches are likely to alter the conclusions of adverse event meta-analyses; and to inform efforts to promote clinical trial transparency and data sharing. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Data sources GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK’s) ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com for individual patient level data (IPD) and GSK’s Study Register platforms, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 2019 for summary level data. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomized, controlled, phase II-IV clinical trials that compared rosiglitazone with any control for at least 24 weeks in adults. Data extraction and synthesis For analyses of trials for which IPD were available, a composite outcome of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiovascular related death, and non-cardiovascular related death was examined. These four events were examined independently as secondary analyses. For analyses including trials for which IPD were not available, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular related death were examined, which were determined from summary level data. Multiple meta-analyses were conducted that accounted for trials with zero events in one or both arms with two different continuity corrections (0.5 constant and treatment arm) to calculate odds ratios and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results 33 eligible trials were identified from ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com for which IPD were available (21 156 patients). Additionally, 103 trials for which IPD were not available were included in the meta-analyses for myocardial infarction (23 683 patients), and 103 trials for which IPD were not available contributed to the meta-analyses for cardiovascular related death (22 772 patients). Among 29 trials for which IPD were available and that were included in previous meta-analyses using GSK’s summary level data, more myocardial infarction events were identified by using IPD instead of summary level data for 26 trials, and fewer cardiovascular related deaths for five trials. When analyses were limited to trials for which IPD were available, and a constant continuity correction of 0.5 and a random effects model were used to account for trials with zero events in only one arm, patients treated with rosiglitazone had a 33% increased risk of a composite event compared with controls (odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.61; rosiglitazone population: 274 events among 11 837 patients; control population: 219 events among 9319 patients). The odds ratios for myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiovascular related death, and non-cardiovascular related death were 1.17 (0.92 to 1.51), 1.54 (1.14 to 2.09), 1.15 (0.55 to 2.41), and 1.18 (0.60 to 2.30), respectively. For analyses including trials for which IPD were not available, odds ratios for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular related death were attenuated (1.09, 0.88 to 1.35, and 1.12, 0.72 to 1.74, respectively). Results were broadly consistent when analyses were repeated using trials with zero events across both arms and either of the two continuity corrections was used. Conclusions The results suggest that rosiglitazone is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, especially for heart failure events. Although increased risk of myocardial infarction was observed across analyses, the strength of the evidence varied and effect estimates were attenuated when summary level data were used in addition to IPD. Because more myocardial infarctions and fewer cardiovascular related deaths were reported in the IPD than in the summary level data, sharing IPD might be necessary when performing meta-analyses focused on safety. Systematic review registration OSF Home https://osf.io/4yvp2/.

Background Mood disorders, depression, and loneliness are established risk factors for thrombotic occlusions. Social relationships in general, and marital status in particular may play a role in predicting cardiovascular outcomes and survival after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the evidence is inconclusive especially in Asians. Methods The Korean patients presented with STEMI (n = 980) constituted married (n = 780); or widowed, divorced, or single (WDS, n = 200) groups. After the matching for age, and gender, the groups were matched 1:1, with each group containing 172 patients. Clinical characteristics and STEMI prognosis such as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and death at 1 year, in married versus WDS patients were collected, and retrospectively analyzed. Results Overall, the total of 70 non-fatal MACE and 51 deaths occurred. At 1-year, the WDS patients exhibited significantly more MACE (44 vs.26; p = 0.016), deaths (32 vs. 19; p = 0.049) and shorter time to MACE occurrence ( p = 0.018), compared to the married patients. There were no differences in revascularization, cerebral infarction, cerebral bleeding, major bleeding, coronary artery bypass graft, early mortality and the overall survival between groups. Conclusion Marital status may be linked to 1-year MACE including survival following STEMI, while being married may improve vascular outcomes compared to WDS in Korean patients. Further larger cohort or/and uniformed national registry studies are required to validate these data, and expand the evidence beyond East Asians.

BACKGROUND Variable response after clopidogrel is well documented and may affect major adverse clinical events after stroke. Impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms is an established marker linked to variable response after clopidogrel. However, the association of certain genetic polymorphisms with prediction of major adverse clinical events following stroke still remains controversial, especially in Caucasians. STUDY QUESTION The primary aim was to evaluate the impact of CYP2C19 allele *2 in heterozygote form on major adverse clinical events in Caucasian poststroke survivors treated with clopidogrel. The secondary aim was to analyze the potential link between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism and variable response after clopidogrel. STUDY DESIGN One hundred thirty patients of Caucasian origin following documented ischemic stroke were included. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and matched with various CYP2C19 loss-of-function genetic polymorphisms and major adverse clinical events (composite of vascular deaths, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction). RESULTS Over the mean follow-up of 14.9 months, 19 patients experienced major adverse clinical events. The risk of major adverse clinical events was nearly 3-fold in loss-of-function allele carriers (hazard ratio = 2.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.083-7.786; P = 0.013), whereas the risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack alone was also higher (hazard ratio = 3.170; 95% confidence interval, 1.281-7.849; P = 0.034). Platelet activity was strongly associated with allele *2 status (rs = 0.21, P = 0.016) but not with other genetic polymorphisms. Carriers of allele*2 exhibited lower platelet response to adenosine diphosphate-mean LTA (30.1% vs. 42.0%; P = 0.017). There were no significant differences in LTA results with other agonists. Strong association of increase in adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation with diabetes mellitus (rs = 0.20, P = 0.023), increasing age (rs = 0.23, P = 0.008), and conversely diminishing over increased weight (rs = 0.23, P = 0.009) was also detected. The carriers of other gene allele variants lack uniformed impact on variable response after clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS Even heterozygous CYP2C19*2 allele carriers among Caucasian patients after ischemic stroke had a higher risk of major adverse clinical events. The LTA, however, did not predict major adverse clinical events. The exact clinical utility of these findings is still uncertain and requires large outcome-driven randomized trial in Caucasians for proof of concept.

Whether aggressive prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) promotes solid cancer risks remains a critical unsolved issue. Since the evidence from randomized trials, affiliated U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews, meta-analyses, and national registries is mixed, the search is ongoing. The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a global passive surveillance repository requiring mandatory updates for serious events. We assessed the frequencies of co-reporting any cancers with oral antiplatelet agent (OAA) strategies in FAERS. We examined the entire FAERS database (n = 8,604,889) with regard to monotherapy or DAPT with OAA, suspected causative role, and co-reporting any cancers (n = 433,111). We extracted cancer cases during monotherapy with aspirin (20,984 out of 462,371 or 4.54%), clopidogrel (2,797 out of 62,791 or 4.45%), prasugrel (119 out of 4,364 or 2.73%), and ticagrelor (144 out of 8.268 or 1.71%). DAPT with clopidogrel reported (2,453 out of 58,101, or 4.22%); prasugrel (162 out of 4,036, or 4.01%); and ticagrelor (195 out of 5,302 or 3.68%) cancer reports all on top of aspirin. We conclude that FAERS is currently unreliable for adequate assessment of cancer risks during DAPT. The retrieved evidence appears random and sporadic, while associated cancers are heavily underreported or/and missed. Without stricter rules, better surveillance, and enforcements, oncology outcome research options in FAERS are challenging.

Background: High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may impact clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, whether any biomarkers assessed before PCI at DAPT loading may predict delayed maintenance HRPR is not clear. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether conventional clinical or laboratory indices at loading before stenting may predict HRPR at 6 months of maintenance DAPT. Methods: The study was designed on a single-center prospective cohort, and included 94 pre-PCI patients. All patients underwent elective PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation, and received DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity was assessed with 5 μmol/L of adenosine diphosphate-induced light transmission aggregometry before PCI, but after 24 h of DAPT loading, and repeated at 6 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, CYP2C19 polymorphism, C-reactive protein, soluble P-selectin, CD40L, interleukin-6, PAI-1 levels, and von Willebrand factor activity were analyzed. Results: The incidence (light transmission aggregometry p = 0.02), total cholesterol (p = 0.01), low-density lipoproteins (p = 0.004), CYP2C19*2 allele carriage (p = 0.006), soluble P-selectin (p = 0.009), and von Willebrand factor (p = 0.04) were linked to future HRPR. However, multivariate regression analysis suggested that only BMI and P-selectin were independent predictors of HRPR. Conclusions: Platelet reactivity before elective stenting is associated with numerous biomarkers; however, only BMI and soluble P-selectin were independent predictors of future HRPR during maintenance-phase DAPT. This may be important for future tailored antiplatelet strategies in patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetics.

Background The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event (AE) Reporting System (FAERS) is a global passive surveillance repository requiring mandatory updates by pharmaceutical manufacturers. Oral antiplatelet agents (OAAs) including aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) are broadly used to prevent thrombosis, at the expense of extra bleeding risks. However, the OAA filing quality and their comparative patterns in FAERS are unknown. We assessed completeness of original annual FAERS reports for OAA with special attention on ASA. Methods We extracted AE cases co-reported with OAA including ASA, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, vorapaxar, or their combination. The 2015 FAERS cases were examined based on OAA distribution, suspected causative role, missing gender or age, and most common AEs after ASA. Results A total of 1,187,729 reports qualified the inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 1,121,989) of the reports contain no reference of OAA, while 65,730 reports contain reference of at least one OAA, including 47,900 ASA cases. Therapy with ASA was heavily (>50%) underreported when used with prasugrel or ticagrelor, but still dominant (72.8%) among OAAs, followed by clopidogrel (18.7%), prasugrel (4.1%), ticagrelor (3.6%), and anecdotal vorapaxar (0.05%). Despite current recommendations, some (0.73%) reports contain multi-OAAs. The primary role of ASA in AE reporting was seldom ( Conclusion The quality of reporting for OAA in general and ASA in particular can be improved by stricter FDA rules, better surveillance, and enforcements. Heavy ASA underreporting during dual antiplatelet therapy and missed demographic variables challenge outcome research capacities for establishing drug interactions in FAERS.

Hypothetically, diminished platelet reactivity (PR) during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should cause extra major bleeding events (MBE), although definite evidence is lacking. Multiple scores have been proposed to stratify bleeding risk, but their predictive value during DAPT is unclear. We compared the performance of the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) with PR testing to predict MBE in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome. We screened 1105, and included 903 consecutive patients who underwent coronary interventions. All patients received DAPT, while MBE were assessed by BARC scale. Admission platelet reactivity was assessed with VerifyNow Analyzer simultaneously with CRUSADE score, and MBE were collected at 1 month and at 1 year post stenting. There were a total of 113 (11%) MBE at 1 month, and extra 41(5%) MBE at 1 year. At 1 month MBE prediction was superior by CRUSADE score (AUC: 0.816, 95% CI: 0.79 0.84, p, Highlights • Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year is a golden standard following coronary stenting in patients with acute coronary syndromes. • Bleeding is a life-threatening major complication associated with chronic aggressive antiplatelet strategies. • Predicting bleeding based on clinical features or established biomarkers is upmost yet unsolved mystery affecting clinical outcomes in such high-risk patients • The CRUSADE clinical score predicts bleeding better than platelet reactivity indices • Short-term bleedings at 30 days, but not delayed 1-yearly hemorrhages were better predicted by CRUSAIDE in East Asians. Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year is common following coronary stenting in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, bleeding is a life-threatening major complication and shortcoming associated with chronic aggressive antiplatelet strategies. CRUSADE score was introduced for better prediction of in-hospital bleeding, while delayed bleeding risks remained unclear. Usually bleeding risk is assessed based on clinical features or by established biomarkers We tested the hypothesis on the superiority of CRUSADE score versus conventional platelet reactivity in a large Korean registry, and revealed the following: major bleeding events in real life are more frequent, and are heavily unreported in clinical trials; the CRUSADE clinical score predicts bleeding better than platelet reactivity indices. Unfortunately, short-term bleedings at 30 days, but not delayed 1-yearly hemorrhages were better predicted by CRUSADE in East Asians.

Background Vorapaxar, a novel antiplatelet thrombin PAR-1 inhibitor, is currently approved for post myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease indications with concomitant use of clopidogrel and/or aspirin. The vorapaxar safety profile was acceptable. However, aside from heightened bleeding risks, excesses of solid cancers and diplopia, there were more amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) diagnoses after vorapaxar. Study question To assess the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews on the potential association of vorapaxar with ALS. Study design The review the public FDA records on reported adverse events after vorapaxar. Measures and outcomes Incidence of ALS after vorapaxar and placebo. Results The ALS risk appears very small, about 1 case per 10,000 treated subjects, but quite probable. Indeed, there were overall 2 placebo and 4 vorapaxar ALS incidences in the Phase III clinical trials. Conclusions Potential adverse association of vorapaxar with ALS risks may be related to off-target neuronal PAR receptor(s) blockade beyond platelet inhibition.

Background: The optimal strategy to manage chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains unclear. The Japanese CTO multicenter registry (J-CTO) score is an established tool for predicting successful recanalization. However, it does not take into account nonangiographic predictors for final technique success. In the present study, we designed and tested a scoring model called the Busan single-center CTO registry (B-CTO) score combining clinical and angiographic characteristics to predict successful CTO recanalization in Korean patients. Methods: Prospectively enrolled CTO patients (n = 438) undergoing coronary intervention (1999-2015) were assessed. The B-CTO score comprises 6 independent predictors: age 60-74 years and lesion length ≥20 mm were assigned 1 point each, while age ≥75 years, female gender, lesion location in the right coronary artery, blunt stump, and bending >45° were assigned 2 points each. For each predictor, the points assigned were based on the associated odds ratio by multivariate analysis. The lesions were classified into 4 groups according to the summation of points scored to assess the probability of successful CTO recanalization: easy (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), difficult (score 4-5), and very difficult (score ≥6). CTO opening was designated as the primary endpoint regardless of the interventional era or the skill of the operator. Results: The final success rate for B-CTO was 81.1%. The probability of successful recanalization for patient groups classified as easy (n = 64), intermediate (n = 148), difficult (n = 134), and very difficult (n = 92) was 95.3, 86.5, 79.1 and 65.2%, respectively (p for trend Conclusions: The B-CTO score has been designed and validated in Korean patients with native coronary CTO and is an improved tool for predicting successful recanalization. Wider application of the B-CTO score remains to be explored.

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a global passive surveillance database that relies on voluntary reporting by health care professionals and consumers as well as required mandatory reporting by pharmaceutical manufacturers. However, the initial filers and comparative patterns for oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitor reporting are unknown. We assessed who generated original FAERS reports for clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in 2015. Methods: From the FAERS database we extracted and examined adverse event cases coreported with oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitors. All adverse event filing originating sources were dichotomized into consumers, lawyers, pharmacists, physicians, other health care professionals, and unknown. Results: Overall, 2015 annual adverse events were more commonly coreported with clopidogrel (n = 13,234) with known source filers (n = 12,818, or 96.9%) than with prasugrel (2,896; 98.9% out of 2,927 cases) or ticagrelor (2,163, or 82.3%, out of 2,627 cases, respectively). Overall, most adverse events were filed by consumers (8,336, or 44.4%), followed by physicians (5,290, or 28.2%), other health care professionals (2,997, or 16.0%), pharmacists (1,125, or 6.0%), and finally by lawyers (129, or 0.7%). The origin of 811 (4.7%) initial reports remains unknown. The adverse event filing sources differ among drugs. While adverse events coreported with clopidogrel and prasugrel were commonly originated by patients (40.4 and 84.3%, respectively), most frequently ticagrelor reports (42.5%) were filed by physicians. Conclusion: The reporting quality and initial sources differ among oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitors in FAERS. The ticagrelor surveillance in 2015 was inadequate when compared to clopidogrel and prasugrel. Patients filed most adverse events for clopidogrel and prasugrel, while physicians originated most ticagrelor complaints. These differences justify stricter compliance control for ticagrelor manufacturers and may be attributed to the confusion of treating physicians with unexpected fatal, cardiac, and thrombotic adverse events linked to ticagrelor.

Background: The optimal dosing of novel oral P2Y12 receptor platelet inhibitors such as prasugrel or ticagrelor is unclear and especially challenging in East Asians. We hypothesize that half-dose prasugrel and ticagrelor may be sufficient for long-term maintenance management in Korean patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with conventional dosages. Design: HOPE-TAILOR (Half Dose of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Platelet Response after Acute Coronary Syndromes) is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded, endpoint (PROBE) single-center, clinical trial. A total of 100 patients with ACS undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation will be randomly assigned to prasugrel, ticagrelor, or clopidogrel, and the patients in each treatment group will receive 1-month therapy with 100 mg q.d. aspirin plus prasugrel 10 mg q.d., ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d., or clopidogrel 75 mg q.d., followed by half-dose prasugrel 5 mg q.d. or ticagrelor 45 mg b.i.d. for maintenance treatment but without clopidogrel dose reduction. The primary endpoint will be optimal platelet reactivity 3 months after coronary intervention, defined by VerifyNow Analyzer (PRU: 85-208) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein P2Y12 flow cytometry assay (platelet reactivity indices: 16-50%). Clinical outcomes will also be assessed, including major efficacy (composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or stroke) and safety (bleeding ≥2 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium). Conclusion: HOPE-TAILOR is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded, endpoint study to explore the efficacy and safety of novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitors administered orally at half the dose in Korean patients with ACS. The results will be available late in 2017.

The impact of thienopyridine reloading on clinical outcomes, and residual high platelet reactivity (HPR) is unclear. We sought to compare the HRP-related effect of prasugrel and clopidogrel reloading in the already clopidogrel-loaded patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).In this prospective, two-center, randomized, open-label study, patients with HPR who had undergone PCI after a clopidogrel (300-600mg) loading dose (LD) were enrolled. Among screened (n=153), HPR was determined in seventy-six patients, who were randomized to either repeated clopidogrel (300mg LD, followed by 75mg MD daily) or prasugrel (20mg LD, followed by 5mg MD daily). The primary endpoint was HPR at 24h after PCI, as determined by the VerifyNow assay. The rates of sustained high and low platelet reactivity, periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and 30-day clinical outcomes were also assessed.Higher inhibition of platelet reactive units (PRU) was observed in the prasugrel group than after clopidogrel reloading (Pre-PCI: 284.4±32.0 vs 279.5±32.5, p=0.504; Post-PCI: 100.0±67.0 vs 202.9±65.8, p0.001; 30days: 170.8±69.8 vs 215.1±62.4, p=0.007). There were less HRP post-PCI after prasugrel compared with the clopidogrel group (2.7 vs 36.1%, p0.001). However, reloading with prasugrel did not reduce PMI compared to clopidogrel (36.8% vs 39.5%, p=0.813).Prasugrel reloading led to a greater reduction in HPR, but similar with clopidogrel PMI in post-PCI patients. Larger randomized evidence is needed for optimization of loading strategies with thienopyridines.NCT01609647.

Despite advanced techniques and improved clinical outcomes, the optimal antiplatelet strategy following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an unsolved mystery. Vorapaxar, a novel platelet thrombin receptor (PAR-1/4) blocker, is currently approved for post-myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease indications on top of clopidogrel or/and aspirin. We here summarize the outcomes in patients after CABG for justification of a future vorapaxar trial. We comprehended the CABG outcomes after vorapaxar yielded from TRACER, TRA2P trials, and affiliated FDA reviews. The verified evidence suggests that composite of death, myocardial infarction and stroke occurred in 2.2% of vorapaxar vs. 8.1% placebo in TRA2P. These data were similar to the endpoint differences (5.9% after vorapaxar vs. 8.3% for placebo) in TRACER. The mortality reduction also consistently suggests vorapaxar advantage (1.7% vs. 2.5% in TRA2P, and 1.7% vs. 3.9% in TRACER). Notably, the post-CABG bleeding risks after vorapaxar were only slightly, but not significantly higher. Moreover, the bleeding disadvantage in the experimental arm was most likely related to overtreatment since majority of patients in both TRACER and TRA2P received triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel on top of vorapaxar. Overall, the FDA-confirmed evidence advocate for the future vorapaxar post-CABG outcome-driven trial. The head-to-head trial testing dual therapy with continued over CABG vorapaxar versus withdrawed clopidogrel, both on top of low dose aspirin is warranted. We conclude that the primary outcomes including mortality were consistently better for heart surgery patients after vorapaxar, while the excess of bleeding was mild. Continuing vorapaxar during CABG may be superior to currently recommended withdrawal antiplatelet strategies, and should be tested in an adequately powered randomized outcome-driven trial.

Background Although low platelet reactivity (LPR) is commonly detected during bleeding, a validated threshold for reliable DAPT bleeding risk stratification is lacking. We tested the diagnostic utility of 3 conventional platelet-activity assays to define the predictive value (if any) of LPR for bleeding. Hypothesis We hypothesized whether one of these tests be better than any others for predicting bleeding events. Methods Patients (n = 800) following drug-eluting stent implantation received DAPT. Bleeding was assessed by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification and events were collected for 1 year after stenting. Platelet reactivity was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). The LPR values for bleeding event stratification were defined as ≤15% for LTA, ≤139 PRU for VerifyNow, and ≤25 U for MEA. Results Bleeding events occurred in 18 patients (2.3%). All tests distinguished LPR as an independent predictor for bleeding by univariate analysis ([HR]: 5.00, 95% [CI]: 1.8-14.0, P = 0.002 for LTA; HR: 21.3, 95% CI: 6.2-73.0, P < 0.0001 for VerifyNow; and HR: 7.4, 95% CI: 2.2-25.5, P = 0.002 for MEA). Multivariate analysis revealed that only VerifyNow (HR: 11.5, 95% CI: 2.9-45.7, P < 0.0004) remained an independent predictor for bleeding. However, the specificity (81.5%, 60.2%, and 81.7%, respectively) and sensitivity (61.1%, 83.3%, and 83.2%, respectively) of all 3 tests were quite low. Conclusions Among 3 conventional platelet-activity assays, VerifyNow was better than LTA or MEA for triaging future bleeding risks. However, all 3 tests failed to reliably predict future bleeding.

SummaryVorapaxar, a novel antiplatelet thrombin PAR-1 inhibitor, has been evaluated in the successful TRA2P trial and the failed TRACER trial. The drug is currently approved for post myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease indications with concomitant use of clopidogrel and/or aspirin. The FDA ruled that the vorapaxar safety profile is acceptable. However, both trials revealed excess diplopia (double vision) usually reversible after vorapaxar. The diplopia risk appears to be small (about 1 extra case per 1,000 treated subjects), but real. Overall, there were 10 placebo and 34 vorapaxar diplopia cases (p=0.018) consistent for TRACER (2 vs 13 cases; p=0.010) and for TRA2P (8 vs 21 cases; p=0.018). Hence, we review the FDA-confirmed evidence and discuss potential causes and implications of such a surprising adverse association, which may be related to off-target PAR receptor mismodulation in the eye.

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening event with a broad presentation spectrum ranging from asymptomatic cases to sudden cardiac arrest. It is unclear if right atrial emboli cause PE in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or if mild PE itself increases right cardiac pressure provoking AF. Objective: To determine the incidence and predictors of asymptomatic PE in patients undergoing AF ablation. Method and Results: Patients (n = 93) were screened and those with previous or current symptomatic PE or venous thromboembolism, pulmonary hypertension, increased right heart pressures detected on echocardiography, a history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, coagulopathy or cancer and inappropriate contrast for the evaluation of pulmonary arterial tree were excluded. The remaining AF patients (n = 71) underwent guided ablation controlled with 3-dimensional, left atrial and pulmonary venous computed tomography. The asymptomatic PE was defined by using the modified Miller score by 2 independent assessors in 6 patients. Univariate logistic regression showed that age (OR: 1.094, 95% CI 1.007-1.188, p = 0.033), diabetes (OR: 12.000, 95% CI 1.902-75.716, p = 0.008), CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR: 2.800, 95% CI 1.304-6.013, p = 0.008), and pulmonary artery diameter (OR: 1.221, 95% CI 1.033-1.444, p = 0.019) were significantly associated with PE. However, multivariate analysis revealed that the CHA2DS2-VASc score (p = 0.047) remained the exclusive significant predictor for asymptomatic PE. Conclusion: The incidence of random asymptomatic PE in AF patients is high (>8%). The CHA2DS2-VASc score can predict silent PE. Since patients with a high CHA2DS2-VASc score are already anticoagulated, our results do not change clinical practice but are noteworthy in terms of the cause-effect relationship between AF and PE.

Several reliable scales have been proposed for the management and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We sought to compare the performance of three conventional risk scores to predict major bleeding (MB; such as ACUITY or CRUSADE), or major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE for GRACE). This study included 904 consecutive post-ACS patients from the single Korean study center who underwent coronary interventions, and were treated with DAPT. All three scores were calculated based on admission data. MB and MACE were collected at 30-day and 1-year follow-ups. MB was defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria (types 3–5), and MACE included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. MB occurred in 114 patients (12.6%) during 30 days, and 65 patients (7.2%) from 30 days till 1-year follow-up. MACE occurred in 28 (3.1%) and 72 (8.0%) patients during 30 and 30 days till 1 year, respectively. For 30 days MB, the discriminatory ability of ACUITY (AUC: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81–0.86) and CRUSADE (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79–0.84) was similar, and more reliable than GRACE (AUC: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.71–0.77; p

Aims Clopidogrel is commonly used even after expiring patents. The brand clopidogrel (BC) was dealt by single company, while numerous manufacturers produce generic clopidogrel (GC). There are no convincing data to compare the safety of different formulations. Therefore, the data yielded from international, uniform, government-mandated registries may be useful. Methods and results We assessed primary causative adverse events (PCAE) after BC and GC in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The outcomes were divided into death, cardiac, thrombotic/embolic, haemorrhagic, and rash/dermal complications. These primary endpoints were then examined by proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and chi-square (χ2). Among total FAERS (n = 9 466 679) reports, overall BC (n = 88 863) cases were more common than after GC (n = 36 559). When triaged by PCAE role, BC (n = 18 328) was also more abundant than GC (n = 3987). The reported death rates were more than doubled after BC [18.4% vs. 7.0%; PRR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32–0.43; χ2=369.7; P Conclusion The PCAE profiles differ with BC and GC in FAERS. While deaths reports were higher, the rates of cardiac, haemorrhagic, and skin complications were less common for BC. Despite expected reporting bias, this may indicate that the manufacturers of GC are reluctant to report deaths to the FDA. However, the overall adverse event profile suggests potentially better safety of BC over GC formulations.

Ranolazine is an anti-angina agent with many metabolites creating the potential for off-target effects. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews sometimes contain clinically relevant data not found in other sources.We reanalyzed data in an FDA review of the placebo-controlled MERLIN trial of ranolazine to display differences in adverse event rates graphically.Rates of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)-related adverse events (eg, angioedema, dry cough, renal impairment, hypotension, anemia, and serum potassium5.5 mmol/L) were higher in patients receiving ranolazine and an ACEI or ARB. Rates of adverse events that should be decreased by ACEI/ARBs (eg, hypokalemia, hypertension, and serum potassium3.5 mmol/L) were lower in patients receiving ranolazine and an ACEI or ARB compared to rates in patients receiving placebo and an ACEI or ARB.Ranolazine potentiates the effects of ACEIs and ARBs. Clinicians should monitor for this potentiation when initiating treatment with ranolazine and an ACEI or ARB.

After the successful PLATO, failed both PHILO and ATLANTIC, PEGASUS trial assessed efficacy and safety of ticagrelor (120 mg/day and 180 mg/day) on top of aspirin versus aspirin alone beyond 1 year in patients with stable coronary disease. Similar to PLATO, PEGASUS revealed reduction of composite primary endpoint after ticagrelor at expense of extra bleeding. However, there were major fundamental differences between the trial outcomes. Hence, the shift of evidence with ticagrelor from PLATO to PEGASUS trials has been comprehended. In contrast to PLATO, in PEGASUS there were more premature permanent ticagrelor discontinuations (PPTD): RR=1.35; 95%CI 1.29-1.42, p

Background: In contrast to the vast majority of pharmaceuticals on the market, antiplatelet agents are widely prescribed in a uniform, ‘one size fits all' manner, without conventional dose adjustments. However, strong evidence yielded from clinical trials repeatedly suggests that patients with a low body weight (LBW), the elderly and those with renal or hepatic impairment may benefit from reduced doses, while younger, heavier patients, males and diabetics may benefit from a dose escalation. Vorapaxar, a thrombin protease-activated receptor-1 inhibitor, has been tested in the TRA2P and TRACER clinical trials, but its efficacy and safety in patients with a LBW is unclear. Objective: To determine the impact of LBW on primary end point rates (PER) and bleeding risk after vorapaxar, as yielded from the TRA2P and TRACER secondary FDA review. Results: The LBW (Conclusion: The FDA analyses revealed no definite proof that LBW is associated with reduced efficacy of vorapaxar. While these data are striking, they can be explained by better outcomes in LBW placebo patients already sufficiently treated with dual-antiplatelet therapy. In contrast to efficacy, both TRA2P and TRACER definitely suggest that bleeding rates after vorapaxar are higher in patients with LBW. Dose adjustment for antiplatelet agents may soon become a reality.