Search

Background: Respiratory multimorbidities are linked to asthma, such as allergic rhinitis (AR) with early allergic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with late nonallergic asthma. Objective: Our aim was to investigate the association of asthma severity and control with specific upper airway phenotypes. Method: Patients with asthma were prospectively recruited from 23 pulmonology and ear, nose, and throat clinics. Asthma severity and control, as well as upper airway comorbidities (AR and non-AR [NAR], CRSwNP, and CRS without nasal polyps [CRSsNP]) were assessed according to international consensus guidelines definitions. Results: A total of 492 asthmatic patients were included. Half of the asthmatic patients (49.6%) had associated rhinitis (37.0% had AR and 12.6% had NAR) and 36.2% had CRS (16.7% had CRSsNP and 19.5% had CRSwNP), whereas 14.2% had no sinonasal symptoms. Most cases of AR (78%) and NAR (84%) were present in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, whereas CRSwNP was more frequent in patients with severe asthma (35% [P < .001]), mainly nonatopic asthma (44% [P < .001]). Patients with severe asthma with CRSwNP had worse asthma control, which was correlated (r = 0.249 [P = .034]) with sinus occupancy. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that late-onset asthma, intolerance of aspirin and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and CRSwNP were independently associated with severe asthma. Conclusion: Severe asthma is associated with CRSwNP, with sinus occupancy affecting asthma control. This study has identified 2 main different upper airway treatable traits, AR and CRSwNP, which need further evaluation to improve management and control of patients with asthma.

The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide.Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists.Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA). Resumen: La Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma, mejor conocida por su acrónimo en español, GEMA, está a nuestra disposición desde hace más de veinte años. Veintiuna sociedades científicas o grupos relacionados, tanto de España como de otros países, han participado en la preparación y desarrollo de la edición actualizada de GEMA que, de hecho, se ha posicionado en la actualidad a nivel mundial como la guía de referencia sobre asma en lengua española.Su objetivo es prevenir y mejorar la situación clínica de las personas con asma, aumentando el conocimiento de los profesionales sanitarios involucrados en su cuidado. Su propósito es convertir la evidencia científica en recomendaciones prácticas sencillas y fáciles de seguir. Por lo tanto, no se trata de una monografía que reúna todo el conocimiento científico sobre la enfermedad, sino más bien de un documento conciso con lo esencial, diseñado para ser aplicado rápidamente en la práctica clínica de rutina. Las recomendaciones son necesariamente multidisciplinares, están desarrolladas para ser útiles y una herramienta indispensable para médicos de diferentes especialidades, así como para profesionales de enfermería y farmacia.Seguramente, los aspectos más destacados de la guía son las recomendaciones para: establecer el diagnóstico del asma utilizando un algoritmo secuencial basado en pruebas diagnósticas objetivas; el seguimiento de los pacientes, preferentemente basado en la estrategia de lograr y mantener el control de la enfermedad; el tratamiento según el nivel de gravedad del asma utilizando seis escalones, desde la menor hasta la mayor necesidad de medicamentos, y el algoritmo de tratamiento basado en fenotipos para la indicación de biológicos en pacientes con asma grave no controlada. A esto se suma ahora una novedad para su fácil uso y seguimiento a través de una aplicación informática basada en la inteligencia artificial conversacional de tipo chatbot (ia-GEMA).

Resumen: Introducción: El asma es una enfermedad con elevada prevalencia, que afecta a todos los grupos de edad y genera elevados costes sociosanitarios. Estudios realizados en diversas poblaciones muestran gran variabilidad en su prevalencia, incluso en poblaciones cercanas geográficamente, con datos que sugieren una influencia relevante de factores socioeconómicos. Actualmente en población adulta de España no disponemos de datos poblacionales fiables sobre la prevalencia de esta enfermedad. Los objetivos de este estudio son estimar la prevalencia de asma en población española de 18-79 años, describir la variabilidad entre comunidades autónomas, estimar la prevalencia de infra y sobrediagnóstico, prevalencia de asma no controlada, de asma córticodependiente, conocer el consumo de recursos sanitarios, identificar los fenotipos más frecuentes y establecer un punto de partida para evaluar la tendencia temporal con estudios posteriores. Material y métodos: Se realizará un estudio transversal, bietápico, incluyendo pacientes de 50 áreas sanitarias. El estudio se desarrollará en tres fases: 1) cribado y confirmación en historia clínica, en la cual se identificarán los pacientes con diagnóstico previo correctamente establecido de asma; 2) diagnóstico de asma, evaluando a los pacientes en los cuales no está claro el diagnóstico de asma con los datos disponibles en la historia clínica; 3) caracterización del asma, analizando las características de estos pacientes e identificando los fenotipos más frecuentes. Discusión: Parece necesario y factible realizar un estudio epidemiológico del asma en España que permita identificar la prevalencia de asma, optimizar la planificación sanitaria, caracterizar los fenotipos más frecuentes de la enfermedad y evaluar los diagnósticos erróneos. Abstract: Introduction: Asthma is a disease with high prevalence, which affects all age groups and generates high health and social care costs. Studies carried out in a number of populations show great variability in its prevalence, even in geographically close populations, with data suggesting a relevant influence of socio-economic factors. At present, we do not have reliable data on the prevalence of this disease in the adult population of Spain. The objectives of this study are to estimate the prevalence of asthma in the Spanish population for those aged 18-79, to describe the variability between autonomous communities, to estimate the prevalence of under and overdiagnosis, to analyse the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma and steroid-dependent asthma, to evaluate the health care cost, to identify the most frequent phenotypes and to establish a starting point to evaluate the temporal trend with subsequent studies. Methods: A cross-sectional, two-stage study will be carried out, including patients from 50 catchment areas. The study will be carried out in 3 phases: 1) screening and confirmation in the clinical history, in which patients with a previously correctly established diagnosis of asthma will be identified; 2) diagnosis of asthma to evaluate patients without a confirmed or excluded diagnosis; 3) characterization of asthma, where the characteristics of the asthmatic patients will be analysed, identifying the most frequent phenotypes. Discussion: It seems necessary and feasible to carry out an epidemiological study of asthma in Spain to identify the prevalence of asthma, to optimize healthcare planning, to characterize the most frequent phenotypes of the disease, and to evaluate inaccurate diagnoses.

The excellent results for monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma (SUCA) represent a milestone in current treatment of asthmatic disorders. Remaining, however, are several subsidiary areas for improvement in which new biologics are expected to make a decisive contribution. These biologics include tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). TSLP is an epithelial-release cytokine (alarmin) that plays a key role in initiating both the innate (group 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC) pathway) and the acquired (T helper 2 (Th2) pathway) immune responses by activating the type 2 (T2) asthma inflammatory pathway through both. It is also thought that it may additionally intervene in the neutrophilic non-T2 inflammatory pathway (via interaction with ILC3 and interleukin-17). Six clinical trials that included 2187 patients with uncontrolled asthma, with 2 or more exacerbations in the previous year, on medium/high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and at least 1 other controller, have demonstrated – irrespective of T2 endotype (and possibly also non-T2 endotype) – the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab, as it significantly reduces exacerbations (61.7%–66%) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and improves lung function, disease control, and quality of life. Tezepelumab could be indicated for the treatment of patients with, independently of the T2 phenotype (eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic), and may even be the only biologic available for treatment of non-T2 SUCA. Resumen: Los excelentes resultados de los anticuerpos monoclonales en el tratamiento del asma grave no controlada (AGNC) constituyen un hito en el tratamiento actual de los trastornos asmáticos. Sin embargo, aún quedan varios aspectos complementarios susceptibles de mejorar para los que se esperan contribuciones decisivas de los nuevos biofármacos, entre los cuales se encuentra el tezepelumab, un anticuerpo monoclonal que bloquea la linfopoyetina estromal tímica (TSLP). La TSLP es una citocina de liberación epitelial (alarmina) que desempeña una función clave en el inicio de las respuestas inmunitarias tanto innata (vía de las células linfocíticas innatas [ILC] del grupo 2) como adaptativa (vía de los linfocitos T cooperadores 2 [Th2]), activando la vía inflamatoria del asma del tipo 2 (T2) mediante ambas. También se cree que puede intervenir en la vía inflamatoria neutrofílica con T2 baja (mediante la interacción con los ILC3 y la interleucina 17). En seis ensayos clínicos que incluyeron a 2.187 pacientes con asma no controlada, dos o más exacerbaciones en el año anterior, a tratamiento con corticosteroides inhalados en dosis medias o altas y con un mínimo de un tratamiento preventivo adicional, se ha demostrado la eficacia y seguridad del tezepelumab sin importar el endotipo T2 (y posiblemente tampoco el endotipo no T2), ya que reduce significativamente las exacerbaciones (61,7-66%) y la hiperreactividad bronquial y mejora la función pulmonar, el control de la enfermedad y la calidad de vida. El tezepelumab puede estar indicado para tratar a pacientes con asma grave, independientemente del fenotipo T2 (eosinofílico y no eosinofílico), y tal vez sea incluso el único biofármaco existente para el tratamiento del AGNC no T2.

Introduction: Adding LAMA to LABA/ICS is recommended to improve control in patients with persistent asthma. Methods: This observational, retrospective, before-and-after study considered patients diagnosed with asthma who started LABA/ICS + LAMA treatment (triple therapy, TT) between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 and had been treated with LABA/ICS (dual therapy, DT) in the year before. Changes in lung function and exacerbation rates, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare and non-healthcare costs (€2019) were estimated in patients with asthma in clinical practices in Spain. Data from computerized medical records from seven Spanish regions were collected ±1 year of LAMA addition. Results: 4740 patients (64.1 years old [SD: 16.3]) were included. TT reduced the incidence of exacerbations by 16.7% (p < 0.044) and the number of patients with exacerbations by 8.5% (p < 0.001) compared to previous DT. The rate of patients with severe exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids and their hospitalization rates significantly decreased by 22.5% and 29.5%. TT significantly improved FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC, saving €571/patient for society. Younger patients with asthma (18–44 years old) and patients with severe asthma (FEV1 < 60%) performed better upon the initiation of TT. Conclusions: TT reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function and reduced healthcare costs vs. DT, particularly in patients requiring systemic corticosteroids to treat severe exacerbations.

Objective: To collect perspectives and explore consensus for expert recommendations related to asthma control and the use of telemedicine among professionals who manage patients with asthma. Design: A Delphi-like questionnaire was designed to analyse the level of agreement about several recommendations formulated by an expert scientific committee about asthma control and the use of telemedicine with this purpose. A dedicated scientific committee validated the questionnaire, which included questions about the participants’ profile and the use of technological tools at a personal level or in clinical practice.The experts expressed their agreement with a Likert-scale of 9 values: 1–3 was considered no agreement, 4–6 neutral, and 7–9 agreement. A rate ≥70% with the same answer was considered consensus. Site: The questionnaire was programmed and distributed as an internet-based survey. Participants: A pre-selected sample of 75 experts with experience in telemedicine (pulmonology, allergology, family medicine, nursing and community pharmacy) responded to a Delphi-like questionnaire composed by six questions and 52 items. Interventions: Consultation was performed in two consecutive waves: the first wave was carried out from 12th of July to 8th of September of 2021; the second wave, from 25th of October to 12th of November of 2021. Main measurements: Three questions about asthma control (actions for achieving or maintaining control of asthma at every visit, current problems that affect asthma control, and potential solutions to offset such problems), and three questions about the impact of telemedicine in asthma control (potential benefits of telemedicine, and potential reticence about telemedicine among both patients and healthcare professionals) were included. Results: From the 52 items inquired, 35 were agreed by consensus. The actions for achieving or maintaining control of asthma, the problems that affect asthma control, and their potential solutions were agreed by consensus. The potential benefits of telemedicine were validated by consensus. None of the potential reservations of patients about telemedicine were validated, while five out of 14 potential reservations of healthcare professionals were agreed by consensus. Conclusions: The COMETA consensus provides a current picture of the main problems for achieving asthma control, the benefits and the reservations about the use of telemedicine in the Spanish setting, and offers solutions. A wide interest in implementing telemedicine has been observed, although current limitations need to be overcome. Resumen: Objetivos: Recoger las perspectivas y explorar el consenso de los expertos en las recomendaciones para un mejor control del asma y el uso de la telemedicina entre los profesionales que tratan pacientes con asma. Diseño: Se diseñó un cuestionario con la metodología Delphi para analizar el nivel de acuerdo en varias recomendaciones formuladas por un comité científico experto sobre el asma y el uso de la telemedicina. Un comité experto validó el cuestionario, que incluyó preguntas sobre el perfil de los participantes y el uso de las herramientas tecnológicas a nivel personal y en la práctica clínica.Los expertos expresaron su acuerdo con una escala de Likert de 9 valores: 1-3 se consideró sin acuerdo, 4-6 neutral y 7-9 de acuerdo. Se consideró consenso cuando ≥70% de los participantes respondieron la misma respuesta. Ubicación: La consulta se realizó online. Participantes: Una muestra preseleccionada de 75 expertos con experiencia en telemedicina (neumología, alergología, medicina familiar, enfermería y farmacia comunitaria) respondió a un cuestionario formado por 6 preguntas y 52 ítems. Intervenciones: La consulta se realizó en dos olas consecutivas: la primera ola tuvo lugar desde el 12 de julio al 8 de septiembre de 2021. Y la segunda ola, del 25 de octubre al 12 de noviembre de 2021. Medidas principales: En el cuestionario se incluyeron tres preguntas sobre el control del asma (acciones para lograr y/o mantener el control del asma, problemas actuales que afectan a este control y las posibles soluciones), y tres preguntas sobre el impacto de la telemedicina en el control del asma (potenciales beneficios de la telemedicina y la posible reticencia a telemedicina entre los pacientes y los profesionales sanitarios). Resultados: De los 52 ítems consultados, en 35 de ellos se alcanzó el consenso. Se acordaron por consenso las acciones para lograr o mantener el control del asma, los problemas que afectan al control del asma y sus posibles soluciones. Los beneficios potenciales de la telemedicina fueron validados por consenso. Ninguna de las posibles reservas de los pacientes sobre la telemedicina fue validada, mientras que cinco de las 14 posibles reservas de los profesionales sanitarios se acordaron por consenso. Conclusiones: El consenso COMETA ofrece una imagen actual de los principales problemas para lograr el control del asma, los beneficios y las reservas sobre el uso de la telemedicina en el ámbito español, y ofrece soluciones. Se ha observado un amplio interés por parte de los profesionales sanitarios por implementar la telemedicina, aunque es necesario superar las limitaciones actuales.

Abstract Background and Aims Asthma is a heterogeneous respiratory disease that encompasses different inflammatory and functional endophenotypes. Many non‐invasive biomarkers has been investigated to its pathobiology. Heany et al proposed a clinical algorithm that classifies severe asthmatic patients into likely‐eosinophilic phenotypes, based on accessible biomarkers: PBE, current treatment, FeNO, presence of nasal polyps (NP) and age of onset. Materials and Methods We assessed the concordance between the algorithm proposed by Heany et al. with sputum examination, the gold standard, in 145 asthmatic patients of the MEGA cohort with varying grades of severity. Results No correlation was found between both classifications 0.025 (CI = 0.013–0.037). Moreover, no relationship was found between sputum eosinophilia and peripheral blood eosinophilia count in the total studied population. Discussion and Conclusion In conclusion, our results suggest that grouping the biomarkers proposed by Heany et al. are insufficient to diagnose eosinophilic phenotypes in asthmatic patients. Sputum analysis remains the gold standard to assess airway inflammation.

Resumen: El asma grave constituye un síndrome heterogéneo con diversas variantes clínicas, y representa en muchas ocasiones una enfermedad compleja con necesidad de un abordaje especializado y multidisciplinar, así como la utilización de múltiples fármacos. La prevalencia del asma grave varía de un país a otro, y se estima que el 50% de estos pacientes graves tienen un mal control de su enfermedad. Para el mejor manejo del paciente es necesario un correcto diagnóstico, un seguimiento adecuado y sin duda ofrecerle el mejor tratamiento disponible, incluyendo los tratamientos biológicos con anticuerpos monoclonales. Con este afán nació este proceso de consenso que se inició en su primera versión en el año 2018, cuya finalidad última es ofrecer al paciente el mejor manejo posible de su enfermedad para así minimizar su sintomatología. Para esta actualización del consenso 2020, se realizó por parte de los autores una revisión de la literatura. Posteriormente a través de un proceso interactivo tipo Delphi a 2 rondas un panel amplio de expertos en asma de SEPAR y las sociedades autonómicas de neumología propusieron las recomendaciones y las conclusiones que se recogen en el documento. Abstract: Severe asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with several clinical variants and often represents a complex disease requiring a specialized and multidisciplinary approach, as well as the use of multiple drugs. The prevalence of severe asthma varies from one country to another, and it is estimated that 50% of these patients present a poor control of their disease. For the best management of the patient, it is necessary a correct diagnosis, an adequate follow-up and undoubtedly to offer the best available treatment, including biologic treatments with monoclonal antibodies. With this objective, this consensus process was born, which began in its first version in 2018, whose goal is to offer the patient the best possible management of their disease in order to minimize their symptomatology. For this 2020 consensus update, a literature review was conducted by the authors. Subsequently, through a two-round interactive Delphi process, a broad panel of asthma experts from SEPAR and the regional pulmonology societies proposed the recommendations and conclusions contained in this document.

Resumen: El asma grave constituye un síndrome heterogéneo con múltiples variantes clínicas y representa el último peldaño en la patología asmática en relación con su gravedad. La prevalencia del asma grave entre los pacientes asmáticos varía de un país a otro, y se estima que el 50% de estos pacientes graves tienen un mal control de su enfermedad. Para el mejor manejo del paciente es necesario un correcto diagnóstico, el seguimiento y sin duda ofrecerle el mejor tratamiento disponible, incluyendo los nuevos avances farmacológicos, como son los anticuerpos monoclonales. Con este afán nació este proceso de consenso, cuya finalidad última es ofrecer al paciente el mejor manejo posible de su enfermedad para así minimizar su sintomatología. Las recomendaciones que se proponen son el resultado de un consenso de tipo nominal desarrollado a lo largo del año 2019 y fueron validadas en sucesivas revisiones posteriores. Abstract: Severe asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with multiple clinical variants, and is the last step in terms of disease severity. The prevalence of severe asthma among asthmatic patients varies from country to country and it is estimated that 50% of these severe patients have poor disease control. Optimal management requires correct diagnosis and follow-up, and the patient must be offered the best treatment available, taking into account new pharmacological advances such as monoclonal antibodies. This consensus process emerged from the desire to offer our patients the best possible management and the chance to minimize symptoms. The proposed recommendations are the result of a nominal consensus process performed throughout 2019, and validated in successive revisions.

Background and aimStudies in the literature suggest the severity of COVID-19 may impact on post-COVID sequelae. We retrospectively compared the different patterns of symptoms in relation to the severity of acute COVID-19 in patients visited at our post-COVID rehabilitation unit.MethodsWe compared respiratory, muscular, cognitive, emotional, and health-related-quality-of-life (HRQoL) measures in three groups of post-COVID patients: those who had not required hospitalization for the acute disease, those who had been admitted to a general hospital ward, and those who had been admitted to the ICU. The main inclusion criteria were persistent dyspnoea (mMRC ≥2) and/or clinical frailty (scale value ≥3).ResultsWe analyzed data from 178 post-COVID patients (91 admitted to the ICU, 60 to the ward, and 27 who had not required admission) at first visit to our post-COVID rehabilitation unit. Most patients (85.4%) had at least one comorbidity. There were more males in all groups (58.1%). ICU patients were older (pConclusionClinical profiles of post-COVID syndrome differed between groups. Muscle parameters were lower in the ICU group but patients who had not needed ICU admission had worse anxiety and HRQoL scores. Many patients who had not required mechanical ventilation had respiratory muscle weakness.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04852718.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain insight into the characteristics and clinical impact of electronic monitoring devices of inhalers (EMDs) and their clinical interventions in adult patients with asthma or COPD. The search included PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases, as well as official EMDs websites. We found eight observational studies and ten clinical trials, assessing a wide range of clinical outcomes. Results from the meta-analysis on adherence to inhalers in a period over three months were favourable in the EMD group (fixed effects model: SMD: 0.36 [0.25–0.48]; random effects model SMD: 0.41 [0.22–0.60]). An exploratory meta-analysis found an improvement in ACT score (fixed effect model SMD: 0.25 [0.11–0.39]; random effects model: SMD: 0.47 [−0.14–1.08]). Other clinical outcomes showed mixed results in the descriptive analyses. The findings of this review highlight the benefits of EMDs in the optimization of adherence to inhaled therapy as well as the potential interest in other clinical outcomes.

Algunos cuestionan la profusión local de guías y consensos sobre asma si existen ya documentos internacionales similares de gran calidad, desarrollados por expertos muy cualificados, que desde hace años se vienen editando con gran difusión. No comparto esta visión, pues, a pesar de la exitosa existencia de estos, el asma continúa siendo un importante problema de salud pública por el que la mayoría de los pacientes siguen sin estar bien controlados, a pesar de disponer hoy de fármacos muy eficaces y seguros. Las causas de dicha incongruencia son variadas, una de ellas es la subóptima calidad asistencial que en ocasiones ofrecen los profesionales sanitarios. En dicho contexto, con el ánimo de mejorar su formación profesional, las guías locales pueden desempeñar un papel clave para llevar a aquellos las mejores recomendaciones terapéuticas adaptadas a la idiosincrasia cultural y a los recursos de cada realidad geográfica.

Abstract Background The prevalence of chronic diseases in the elderly (> 65 years), including asthma, is growing, yet information available on asthma in this population is scarce. Our objective is to determine the differential clinical and functional characteristics of the population > 65 years old with asthma included in the Integrated Research Programs of Asthma Databank of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (www.bancodatosasma.com). Methods Retrospective comparative descriptive study of demographic, clinical and functional variables for 1713 patients with asthma categorized into 3 age groups as follows: adults aged 65 is more severe and associated with greater comorbidity, which would indicate the need for a more integrated and multidimensional approach to asthma treatment for these patients.

Resumen: A pesar de los avances terapéuticos disponibles actualmente, el grado de control del asma es escaso. Dicho control se basa en evaluar al paciente, ajustar el tratamiento y revisar la respuesta al mismo. En situaciones normales, el seguimiento y el control del asma se realizan mediante visitas presenciales secuenciales. Sin embargo, debido a las medidas de bioseguridad y distanciamiento para evitar la transmisión de la enfermedad durante una pandemia, ese seguimiento y control se ven limitados. Así es como ha surgido la teleasistencia, la cual dispone de una amplia evidencia publicada en asma. Aun así, no ha de entenderse como una forma de sustituir a las consultas presenciales, sino como una alternativa complementaria a las mismas, en las que se permite el seguimiento de los pacientes cuando no sea necesario o no se pueda realizar una consulta presencial. A través del proyecto COntrol como Meta en la Era de la Telemedicina en el Asma (COMETA), un grupo de expertos abordó en profundidad la enfermedad asmática, analizando de forma detallada los problemas existentes para poder alcanzar el control, y proponer soluciones ante situaciones como las que estamos viviendo actualmente con la pandemia de la COVID-19. Abstract: Despite the therapeutic advances currently available, asthma control is poor. Such control is based on assessing the patient, adjusting treatment, and reviewing the response to treatment. In normal situations, asthma is monitored and controlled by sequential face-to-face visits. However, due to biosecurity and distancing measures to avoid disease transmission during a pandemic, such monitoring and control is limited. This is how tele-assistance, which is available from extensive published evidence in asthma, has emerged. Even so, it should not be understood as a substitute for face-to-face consultations, but as a complementary alternative to them, in which patients can be monitored when a face-to-face consultation is not necessary or cannot be carried out. Through the COMETA project (COntrol como Meta en la Era de la Telemedicina en el Asma, Control as a Goal in the Age of Telemedicine in Asthma), a group of experts addressed in depth the asthmatic pathology, analyzing in detail the existing problems in order to achieve control and propose solutions to situations such as those we are currently experiencing with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Introduction The MEGA (MEchanism underlying the Genesis and evolution of Asthma) project is a multicenter cohort study carried out in eight Spanish hospitals, gathering clinical, physiological, and molecular data from patients with asthma and multimorbidities in order to gain insight into the different physiopathological mechanisms involved in this disorder. Material and Methods We report the baseline clinical and physiological characteristics and biomarker measures of adult participants in the project with the aim of better understanding the natural history and underlying mechanisms of asthma as well as the associated multimorbidities across different levels of severity. We carried out a detailed clinical examination, pulmonary function testing, measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood counts, induced sputum, skin prick tests, chest computed tomography scan, asthma questionnaires, and multimorbidity assessment in 512 asthmatic patients. Results When compared to patients with milder disease, severe asthmatic patients showed greater presence of symptoms, more exacerbations, lower asthma control, increased airflow obstruction, and higher frequency of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, severe rhinitis, anxiety and depression, gastroesophageal reflux, and bronchiectasis. Conclusion The MEGA project succeeded in recruiting a high number of asthma patients, especially those with severe disease, who showed lower control and higher frequency of multimorbidities.

IntroductionAsthma with airway mucus hypersecretion is an inadequately characterized variant of asthma. While several studies have reported that hypersecreting patients may carry genetic variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, many of those studies have been questioned for their numerous limitations and contradictory results.Objectives(1) To determine the presence of genetic variants of the CFTR gene in patients with asthma with and without airway mucus hypersecretion. (2) To identify the clinical, inflammatory and functional characteristics of the asthma phenotype with airway mucus hypersecretion.MethodComparative multicentre cross-sectional descriptive study that included 100 patients with asthma (39 hypersecretors and 61 non-hypersecretors). Asthmatic hypersecretion was defined as the presence of cough productive of sputum on most days for at least 3 months in 2 successive years. The patients were tested for fractional exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, induced sputum cell count, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), peripheral blood eosinophil count, C-reactive protein, blood fibrinogen and blood albumin and underwent a skin prick test. Asthma control and quality of life were assessed by the Asthma Control Test and Mini Asthma Quality of Life questionnaires, respectively. Blood DNA samples were collected from the patients and next-generation sequencing using a MiSeq sequencer and the Illumina platform was used for the CFTR gene analysis.ResultsGenetic differences were observed in the c.1680-870T>A polymorphism of the CFTR gene, significantly more evident in hypersecretors than in non-hypersecretors: 78.94% vs. 59.32% in the majority allele and 21.05% vs. 40.67% in the minority allele (p = 0.036). Clinically, asthma hypersecretors compared to non-hypersecretors were older (57.4 years vs. 49.4 years; p = 0.004); had greater asthma severity (58.9% vs. 23.7%; p = 0.005); experienced greater airway obstruction (FEV1/FVC% 64.3 vs. 69.5; p = 0.041); had poorer asthma control (60% vs. 29%; p = 0.021); had lower IgE levels (126.4 IU/mL vs. 407.6 IU/mL; p = 0.003); and were less likely to have a positive prick test (37.5% vs. 68.85%; p = 0.011).ConclusionThe results suggest that patients with asthma and with mucus hypersecretion (1) may have a different phenotype and disease mechanism produced by an intronic polymorphism in the CFTR gene (NM_000492.3:c.1680-870T>A), and (2) may have a poorer clinical outcome characterized by severe disease and poorer asthma control with a non-allergic inflammatory phenotype.

BACKGROUND:Most patients with nonallergic asthma have normal serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels. Recent reports suggest that total and aeroallergen-specific IgE levels in induced sputum may be higher in nonallergic asthmatics than in healthy controls. Our objective is to compare total and dust-mite specific (Der p 1) IgE levels in induced sputum in allergic and nonallergic asthmatics and healthy controls. METHODS:Total and Der p 1-specific IgE were measured in induced sputum (ImmunoCAP immunoassay) from 56 age- and sex-matched asthmatics (21 allergic, 35 nonallergic) and 9 healthy controls. Allergic asthma was defined as asthma with a positive prick test and/or clinically-significant Der p 1-specific serum IgE levels. RESULTS:Patients with allergic asthma presented significantly higher total and Der p 1-specific serum IgE levels. There were no significant between-group differences in total sputum IgE. However, Der p 1-specific sputum IgE levels were significantly higher (p = 0.000) in the allergic asthmatics, but without differences between the controls and nonallergic asthmatics. Serum and sputum IgE levels were significantly correlated, both for total IgE (rho = 0.498; p = 0.000) and Der p 1-specific IgE (rho, 0.621; p = 0001). CONCLUSIONS:Total IgE levels measured in serum and induced sputum are significantly correlated. No significant differences were found between the differents groups in total sputum IgE. Nevertheless, the levels of Der p 1-specific sputum IgE levels were significantly higher in the allergic asthmatics, but without differences between the controls and nonallergic asthmatics. Probably due to the lack of sensitivity of the test used, but with the growing evidence for local allergic reactions better methods are need to explore its presence. The Clinical Trials Identifier for this project is NCT03640936.

While poor inhaler technique in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can compromise the effectiveness of inhaled medications, identifying and quantifying these errors may suggest ways to improve inhalation technique and patient outcomes. The objective of this international, multicentre care improvement programme was to investigate errors in inhaler use (handling errors and inhalation errors) made by patients in handling two dry powder inhalers; DuoResp® Spiromax® and Symbicort® Turbuhaler®. Patients with asthma or COPD aged between 18 and 80 years attending the allergology/pneumology departments of 14 hospitals in Spain and Portugal were included. All assessments were performed during one regular scheduled visit to the study clinic. Among 161 eligible patients (138 with asthma; 23 with COPD), inhalation errors were the most common type of error, with no significant difference between devices in overall total error rate, handling error rate or inhalation error rate. Significantly fewer total errors per patient (1.4 vs. 1.9; p

Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de dos programas de gestión en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Diseño: Estudio de diseño cuasi-experimental para evaluar la efectividad de dos intervenciones (I1, I2) para la asistencia de pacientes con EPOC, tras un seguimiento medio de 31,2 meses. Emplazamiento: Centros de atención primaria de dos áreas sanitarias de Barcelona y sus hospitales de referencia. Participantes: Pacientes EPOC seleccionados por muestreo aleatorio simple en los que constara algún código correspondiente a EPOC. Intervenciones: I1: Programa de gestión integral que optimizaba y coordinaba los recursos. Se hizo formación y control de calidad de la espirometría. I2: Intervenciones aisladas, como el call-center. Compartían circuitos asistenciales y la historia clínica informatizada. Mediciones principales: variables de función pulmonar, gravedad, uso de inhaladores, estilos de vida, calidad de vida y exacerbaciones. Resultados: De los 393 pacientes evaluados al inicio, 120 y 104 (I1 e I2, respectivamente) realizaron la evaluación final. Con la I1 hubo una reducción de los pacientes fumadores (p = 0,034). En ambos grupos, la función pulmonar y la calidad de vida se mantuvieron y la disnea mostró un leve empeoramiento. El correcto uso de inhaladores aumentó, aunque solo alcanzó el 48 y el 61% con la I1 e I2, respectivamente. El porcentaje de pacientes exacerbados disminuyó con la I1 (respecto I2 [p

OBJECTIVE: Studies assessing the characteristics and management of patients hospitalized with asthma have been limited to a small number of facilities and have evaluated short time periods. The present study evaluated long-term changes among hospitalized asthma patients at a large number of facilities. METHODS: This was a retrospective, hospital-based observational case series, designated the Study of Severe Asthma in Latin America and Spain, which was conducted in Spain and in eight Latin-American countries. We reviewed the hospital records of 3,038 patients (age range, 15-69 years) hospitalized with acute severe asthma at one of nineteen tertiary-care hospitals in 1994, 1999 and 2004. RESULTS: Over time, the use of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists increased significantly, whereas the use of theophylline as a controller medication decreased. The utilization of pulmonary function tests also increased. There was a significant reduction in the mean hospital stay (8.5 days, 7.4 days and 7.1 days in 1994, 1999 and 2004, respectively, p = 0.0001) and a significant increase in the mean of the lowest arterial pH at hospital admission. In contrast, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of cases in which PEF was determined in the emergency room (48.6% in 1994 vs. 43.5% in 2004, p = 0.0001). We found the quality of asthma management and care to be generally better in Spain than in Latin America. CONCLUSIONS: Although there have been certain improvements in the management of asthma between severe exacerbations and during hospitalization, asthma management remains suboptimal in Spain and, especially, in Latin America.OBJETIVO: Estudos que avaliem as características e o gerenciamento de pacientes asmáticos hospitalizados têm sido limitados a um número pequeno de serviços e a curtos períodos de duração. O presente estudo avaliou alterações de longo prazo de pacientes asmáticos hospitalizados em um grande número de serviços. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, observacional, de base hospitalar, denominado Estudo sobre Asma Grave na América Latina e Espanha, realizado na Espanha e em oito países da América Latina. Foi realizada uma revisão dos registros hospitalares de 3.038 pacientes (variação de idade, 15-69 anos) hospitalizados com asma aguda grave em um dos 19 hospitais terciários em 1994, 1999 e 2004. RESULTADOS: Ao longo do tempo, o uso de corticosteroides inalatórios e de β2-agonistas aumentou significativamente, ao passo que o uso de teofilina, como medicação de controle, decaiu. A utilização de testes de função pulmonar também aumentou. Houve uma redução significativa da média do tempo de internação (8,5 dias, 7,4 dias e 7,1 dias em 1994, 1999 e 2004, respectivamente; p = 0,0001) e um aumento significativo da média do menor pH arterial na admissão. Em contrapartida, houve uma diminuição significativa na proporção de casos submetidos ao PFE no pronto-socorro (48,6% em 1994 vs. 43,5% em 2004; p = 0,0001). O tratamento e o gerenciamento da asma foram, de forma geral, melhores na Espanha que na América Latina. CONCLUSÕES: Embora tenha havido avanços no gerenciamento da asma entre exacerbações graves e durante a hospitalização, esse gerenciamento continua subotimizado na Espanha e, em especial, na América Latina.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar, pela primeira vez, as características de pacientes com asma aguda que morreram durante a hospitalização na Espanha e na América Latina, bem como avaliar fatores associados à mortalidade por asma. MÉTODOS: Revisão retrospectiva dos registros hospitalares de 3.038 pacientes com asma (com idade entre 15 e 69 anos) internados em dezenove hospitais de atendimento terciário na Espanha e em oito países da América Latina em 1994, 1999 e 2004. RESULTADOS: Houve 25 mortes (0,8% de todos os pacientes hospitalizados) durante os três anos estudados. Embora tenha havido uma tendência de redução da mortalidade hospitalar (de 0,97% em 1994 para 0,69% em 2004), não houve diferenças significativas quanto ao ano ou à área geográfica. Internações em unidade de terapia intensiva e casos de parada pulmonar pré-hospitalar aumentaram as taxas de mortalidade para 8,3% e 24,7%, respectivamente. A análise multivariada mostrou que sexo (feminino; OR = 25,5; IC95%: 2,6-246,8), parada cardiopulmonar pré-hospitalar (OR = 22,5; IC95%: 4,4-114,7) e pH arterial < 7,3 durante a hospitalização (OR = 1,0; IC95%: 1,1-3,4) estavam fortemente associados à mortalidade por asma. CONCLUSÕES: Nosso estudo sobre mortalidade em pacientes hospitalizados por asma aguda grave mostrou que as mortes ocorreram quase que exclusivamente entre pacientes do sexo feminino e entre pacientes que sofreram parada cardiopulmonar pré-hospitalar, confirmando achados anteriores de estudos realizados em países desenvolvidos.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, for the first time, the characteristics of patients with acute asthma who died during hospitalization in Spain and Latin America, as well as to evaluate factors associated with asthma mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of hospital records of 3,038 patients with asthma (aged 15-69 years) admitted to nineteen tertiary care hospitals in Spain and in eight Latin-American countries in 1994, 1999, and 2004. RESULTS: There were 25 deaths (0.8% of all hospitalized patients) during the three years studied. Although there was a tendency towards a reduction in in-hospital mortality (from 0.97% in 1994 to 0.69% in 2004), there were no significant differences in terms of year or geographic area. Intensive care unit admissions and cases of out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest increased the mortality rates to 8.3% and 24.7%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that gender (female; OR = 25.5; 95% CI: 2.6-246.8), out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OR = 22.5; 95% CI: 4.4-114.7), and arterial pH < 7.3 during hospitalization (OR = 1.0; 95% CI: 1.1-3.4) were strongly associated with asthma mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our study on mortality in patients hospitalized for acute severe asthma showed that deaths occurred almost exclusively in female patients and in patients who suffered out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, confirming previous findings from studies conducted in developed countries.

BACKGROUND:The measurement of fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath (FeNO), a noninvasive indicator of airway inflammation, remains controversial as a tool to assess asthma control. Guidelines currently limit asthma control assessment to symptom and spirometry based appraisals such as the Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7). We aimed at determining whether adding FeNO to ACQ-7 improves current asthma clinical control assessment, through enhanced detection of not well controlled asthma. METHODS:Asthmatic subjects, classified as not well controlled as per ACQ-7 on regular clinical practice, were included in a prospective, multicenter fashion, and had their maintenance treatment adjusted on visit 1. On follow-up (visit 2) four weeks later, the subjects were reevaluated as controlled or not well controlled using ACQ-7 versus a combination of FeNO and ACQ-7. RESULTS:Out of 381 subjects enrolled, 225 (59.1%) had not well controlled asthma on visit 2 as determined by ACQ-7, and 264 (69.3%) as per combined FeNO and ACQ-7. The combination of FeNO to ACQ-7 increased by 14.8% the detection of not well controlled asthma following maintenance therapy adjustment. CONCLUSIONS:The addition of FeNO to ACQ-7 increased the detectability of not well controlled asthma upon adjustment of maintenance therapy. Adding a measure of airway inflammation to usual symptom and spirometry based scores increases the efficacy of current asthma clinical control assessment.