Search

Background: Conventional cannulated screws are commonly used for internal fixation in the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. However, the noticeably high rates of undesirable outcomes such as nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, and fixation failure still troubled the patients and surgeons. It is urgent to develop new cannulated screws to improve the above clinical problems. The purpose of this study was to design a novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw and to further evaluate its biomechanical performance for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. Methods: A novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw was designed, and the conventional titanium cannulated screw was also modeled. The finite element models for vertical femoral neck fractures with magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws and conventional cannulated screws were respectively established. The hip joint contact force during walking gait calculated by a subject-specific musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model, was used as loads and boundary conditions for both finite element models. The stress and displacement distributions of the cannulated screws and the femur, the micromotion of the fracture surfaces of the femoral neck, and the overall stiffness were calculated and analyzed using finite element models. The biomechanical performance of the Magnesium–Titanium hybrid cannulated screws was evaluated. Results: The maximum stresses of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws and the conventional cannulated screws were 451.5 ​MPa and 476.8 ​MPa, respectively. The maximum stresses of the femur with the above different cannulated screws were 140.3 ​MPa and 164.8 ​MPa, respectively. The maximum displacement of the femur with the hybrid cannulated screws was 6.260 ​mm, lower than the femur with the conventional cannulated screws, which was 7.125 ​mm. The tangential micromotions in the two orthogonal directions at the fracture surface of the femoral neck with the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws were comparable to those with the conventional cannulated screws. The overall stiffness of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw system was 490.17 ​N/mm, higher than that of the conventional cannulated screw system, which was 433.92 ​N/mm. Conclusion: The magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw had superior mechanical strength and fixation stability for the treatment of the vertical femoral neck fractures, compared with those of the conventional cannulated screw, indicating that the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw has great potential as a new fixation strategy in future clinical applications.The translational potential of this article: This study highlights an innovative design of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. The novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw not only to provide sufficient mechanical strength and fixation stability but also to contribute to the promotion of fracture healing, which could provide a better treatment for the vertical femoral neck fractures, beneficially reducing the incidence of nonunion and reoperation rates.

Abstract Background The optimal internal fixation strategy for vertical femoral neck fractures (VFNFs) in nongeriatric patients remains uncertain. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the clinical prognoses and underlying mechanical characteristics of a novel off-axis screw technique with dynamic hip screws (DHSs) and three traditional parallel screws. Methods This study included a clinical investigation and a patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA). In the clinical investigation, VFNF patients were grouped by fixation type: (1) use of three parallel screws (G-TRI); (2) augmentation with an off-axis screw (G-ALP); and (3) DHS with an anti-rotational screw (G-DHS). Fixation failures (nonunion, femoral neck shortening (FNS), varus deformation, screw cut-out) and avascular necrosis (AVN) consequent to the three types of fixations were compared. In the FEA, twenty-four fixation models with the three fixation types were created based on the data of eight healthy volunteers. Models were assessed under walking conditions. Stiffness, interfragmentary motion (IFM), and implant stress were evaluated. Results In the clinical investigation, the fixation failure rate was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in G-ALP (18.5%) than in G-DHS (37.5%) and G-TRI (39.3%). No significant difference in AVN was observed among the three fixation groups. In the FEA, stiffness and implant stress in the G-DHS models were significantly (p < 0.05) higher, and the IFM of G-ALP was significantly (p < 0.05) lower among the groups. Conclusions Among fixation types for VFNFs, the off-axis screw technique exhibited better interfragmentary stability (lowest IFM) and a lower fixation failure rate (especially FNS). Analyzing interfragmentary stability in biomechanical experiments is more consistent with clinical prognosis than construct stability for VFNFs, suggesting that internal fixations should aim for this outcome.

Vertical femoral neck fractures in patients younger than 65 years of age often require hip‐conserving surgeries. However, traditional fixation strategies using three parallel cannulated screws often fail in such patients due to an unfavorable biomechanical environment. This study compared different cannulated screw fixation techniques in patients via patient‐specific finite element analysis with linear tetrahedral (C3D4) elements. Forty vertical femoral neck fracture models were created based on computed tomography images obtained from eight healthy participants. Five different fixation strategies: alpha, buttress, rhomboid, inverted triangle, and triangle were assessed in walking status. Biomechanical parameters including stiffness, interfragmentary motion in two directions (detachment and shearing), compression force, and maximal implant stress were evaluated. The mean relative coefficient of strain distribution between the finite element analysis and experiment was from 0.78 to 0.94. Stiffness was highest (p <.05) in the buttress group (923.1 N/mm), while interfragmentary motion was lowest (p <.05) in the alpha group. Maximal stress was highest (p <.05) in the buttress group and lowest in the alpha group. Shearing values were significantly lower in the alpha group than in the rhomboid group (p =.004). Moreover, Shearing values were significantly higher (p =.027), while detachment values were significantly lower (p =.027), in the inverted triangle than in the triangle group. Clinical significance: Our results suggest that alpha fixation is the most reliable and biomechanically efficient strategy for young patients with vertical femoral neck fractures. Regular and inverted triangular fixation strategies may be suitable for fractures of different skeletal constructions due to antidetachment/shearing abilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal internal fixation strategy for vertical femoral neck fractures (VFNFs) in nongeriatric patients remains uncertain. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the clinical prognoses and underlying mechanical characteristics of a novel off-axis screw technique with dynamic hip screws (DHSs) and three traditional parallel screws. Methods: This study included a clinical investigation and a patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA). In the clinical investigation, VFNF patients were grouped by fixation type: (1) use of three parallel screws (G-TRI); (2) augmentation with an off-axis screw (G-ALP); and (3) DHS with an anti-rotational screw (G-DHS). Fixation failures (nonunion, femoral neck shortening (FNS), varus deformation, screw cut-out) and avascular necrosis (AVN) consequent to the three types of fixations were compared. In the FEA, twenty-four fixation models with the three fixation types were created based on the data of eight healthy volunteers. Models were assessed under walking conditions. Stiffness, interfragmentary motion (IFM), and implant stress were evaluated. Results: In the clinical investigation, the fixation failure rate was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in G-ALP (18.5%) than in G-DHS (37.5%) and G-TRI (39.3%). No significant difference in AVN was observed among the three fixation groups. In the FEA, stiffness and implant stress in the G-DHS models were significantly (p < 0.05) higher, and the IFM of G-ALP was significantly (p < 0.05) lower among the groups. Conclusions: Among fixation types for VFNFs, the off-axis screw technique exhibited better interfragmentary stability (lowest IFM) and a lower fixation failure rate (especially FNS). Analyzing interfragmentary stability in biomechanical experiments is more consistent with clinical prognosis than construct stability for VFNFs, suggesting that internal fixations should aim for this outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the clinical therapeutic effect of transverse cancellous lag screw (TCLS) fixations and ordinary cannulated screw (OCS) fixations for vertical femoral neck fractures. Methods A total of 62 eligible patients with an average age of 56.2 years (range, 19–45 years; 40 male and 22 female) with Pauwels’ type III femoral neck fractures were recruited in our study from January 2016 to December 2017. Among the patients, 30 underwent TCLS fixation (TCLS group), and the others were treated with OCS fixation (OCS group). The baseline data, perioperative outcomes (operative time, intra‐operative blood loss, reduction quality, and hospital time), postoperative outcomes evaluated by a variety of scales including visual analogue scale (VAS) score, EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ‐5D) and Harris hip scores (HHS), and complications (nonunion, femoral head necrosis, femoral neck shortening, and failure of fixation) of the two groups were recorded to compare at 12‐month follow‐up. Results The mean follow‐up time of included patients was 13.4 ± 1.6 months in the TCLS group and 13.7 ± 0.9 months in the OCS group. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data as well as perioperative outcomes, including operative time, intra‐operative blood loss, the hemoglobin difference before and after treatment, quality of reduction, and hospital time between two groups. Likewise, the VAS score, the EQ‐5D score, and complications rates including nonunion and femoral head necrosis had no distinct difference in two groups. However, HHS in the TCLS group were superior to those in the OCS group at 12‐month follow‐up, and the femoral neck shortening rate was prominently reduced in the TCLS group when compared with the OCS group. Conclusions Treating vertical femoral neck fractures with the TCLS technique could significantly improve hip functional recovery and reduce the postoperative femoral neck shortening rate. The present study provides novel insight for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures.

• Simple-plane osteotomy FE model cannot accurately represent the natural fracture. • 4 out of 13 parameters are identified for optimal IFS evaluation. • Two SPO model parameters significantly differed from the natural fracture model. • Individualized IFSs for per patient are optimal for treating vFNFs. The conventional method for simulating vertical femoral neck fractures (vFNFs) is via a vertical single-plane osteotomy (SPO) across the entire femur. However, the accuracy of SPO for evaluating the optimal internal fixation strategy (IFS) and the appropriate assessment parameters is not clear. This study thus aimed to examine the accuracy of SPO in evaluating IFSs and to identify appropriate evaluation parameters using finite element analysis. Eighty patient-specific finite element models were developed based on CT images from eight vFNF patients. The natural fracture model was built using structural features of the affected side, while the SPO was simulated on the healthy side. Five different IFSs were applied to both the natural fracture and SPO groups. Thirteen parameters, including stress, displacement, and stiffness, were subjected to a two-way repeated measures ANOVA to determine the effect of IFSs and fracture morphology on stability. A Pearson correlation analysis was performed on varied parameters with various IFSs to identify independent parameters. Based on these independent parameters, the entropy evaluation method (EEM) score was used to rank the performance of IFSs for each patient. Eight of the thirteen parameters were significantly influenced by IFSs (p < 0.05), two by fracture morphology (p < 0.01), and none by the interaction between IFS and fracture morphology. In the natural fracture group, parameters including screw stress and displacement, bone cut rate (BCR), and compression effects varied independently with distinct IFSs. In the SPO group, trunk displacement, BCR, cut-out risk, and compression effects parameters changed independently. The BCR of the Alpha strategy was significantly higher than that of the Inverted strategy in the natural fracture group (p = 0.002), whereas the opposite was observed in the SPO group (p = 0.016). Regarding compression effects, two IFS pairings in the natural fracture group and seven IFS pairings in the SPO group exhibited significant differences. None of the five IFSs achieved the optimal EEM score for each patient. The single-plane osteotomy model may have limitations in assessing IFSs, particularly when the bone cut rate and compression effects are the main influencing factors. Parameters of the screw stress and displacement, BCR, and compression effects appear to be relevant in evaluating IFSs for natural fracture models. It indicates that individualized natural fracture models could provide more comprehensive insights for determining the optimal IFS in treating vFNFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the clinical therapeutic effect of transverse cancellous lag screw (TCLS) fixations and ordinary cannulated screw (OCS) fixations for vertical femoral neck fractures. Methods: A total of 62 eligible patients with an average age of 56.2 years (range, 19–45 years; 40 male and 22 female) with Pauwels' type III femoral neck fractures were recruited in our study from January 2016 to December 2017. Among the patients, 30 underwent TCLS fixation (TCLS group), and the others were treated with OCS fixation (OCS group). The baseline data, perioperative outcomes (operative time, intra‐operative blood loss, reduction quality, and hospital time), postoperative outcomes evaluated by a variety of scales including visual analogue scale (VAS) score, EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ‐5D) and Harris hip scores (HHS), and complications (nonunion, femoral head necrosis, femoral neck shortening, and failure of fixation) of the two groups were recorded to compare at 12‐month follow‐up. Results: The mean follow‐up time of included patients was 13.4 ± 1.6 months in the TCLS group and 13.7 ± 0.9 months in the OCS group. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data as well as perioperative outcomes, including operative time, intra‐operative blood loss, the hemoglobin difference before and after treatment, quality of reduction, and hospital time between two groups. Likewise, the VAS score, the EQ‐5D score, and complications rates including nonunion and femoral head necrosis had no distinct difference in two groups. However, HHS in the TCLS group were superior to those in the OCS group at 12‐month follow‐up, and the femoral neck shortening rate was prominently reduced in the TCLS group when compared with the OCS group. Conclusions: Treating vertical femoral neck fractures with the TCLS technique could significantly improve hip functional recovery and reduce the postoperative femoral neck shortening rate. The present study provides novel insight for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Posterior-inferior comminution dominantly increases superior-middle detached interfragmentary movement in VFNF, and results in varus deformation. • For VFNF with PICOM, alpha fixation performed optimally in patients with or without osteoporosis, due to the best anti-shear force, interfragmentary stability, lowest implant stress. • Although FNS is insufficient in resisting shear displacement, it took the advantages of greatest stiffness, anti-varus property and lowest bone yielding rate in osteoporosis cases, thus holds potential for further development in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with large-scale comminution or with osteoporosis. Fracture comminution occurs in 83.9%-94% of vertical femoral neck fractures (VFNFs), the majority of which were located in posterior-inferior region, and poses a clinical challenge in fixation stability. We conducted a subject-specific finite element analysis to determine the biomechanical features and optimal fixation selection for treating VFNF with posterior-inferior comminution. Eighteen models with three fracture types (VFNF without comminution [NCOM], with comminution [COM], with comminution + osteoporosis [COMOP]) and six internal fixation types (alpha [G-ALP], buttress [G-BUT], rhomboid [G-RHO], dynamic hip screw [G-DHS], invert triangle [G-ITR], femoral neck system (G-FNS)) were created based on the computed tomography data. By using the subject-specific finite element analysis method, stiffness, implant stress, yielding rate (YR) were compared. Additionally, in order to elucidate distinct biomechanical characters of different fracture types and fixation strategies, we calculated interfragmentary movement (IFM), detached interfragmentary movement (DIM), shear interfragmentary movement (SIM) of all fracture surface nodes. Generally, in comparison with NCOM, COM showed a 30.6% reduction of stiffness and 1.46-times higher mean interfragmentary movement. Besides, COM had a 4.66-times (p = 0.002) higher DIM at the superior-middle position, but similar SIM across fracture line, which presented as varus deformation. In COM and COMOP, among all six fixation strategies, G-ALP had significantly the lowest IFM (p <0.001) and SIM (p <0.001). Although G-FNS had significantly highest IFM and SIM (p <0.001), it had the highest stiffness and lowest DIM (p <0.001). In COMOP, YR was the lowest in G-FNS (2.67%). Posterior-inferior comminution primarily increases superior-middle detached interfragmentary movement in VFNF, which results in varus deformation. For comminuted VFNF with or without osteoporosis, alpha fixation has the best interfragmentary stability and anti-shear property among six current mainstream fixation strategies, but a relatively weaker stiffness and anti-varus property compared to fixed-angle devices. FNS is advantageous owing to stiffness, anti-varus property and bone yielding rate in osteoporosis cases, but is insufficient in anti-shear property. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Conventional cannulated screws are commonly used for internal fixation in the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. However, the noticeably high rates of undesirable outcomes such as nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, and fixation failure still troubled the patients and surgeons. It is urgent to develop new cannulated screws to improve the above clinical problems. The purpose of this study was to design a novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw and to further evaluate its biomechanical performance for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures., Methods: A novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw was designed, and the conventional titanium cannulated screw was also modeled. The finite element models for vertical femoral neck fractures with magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws and conventional cannulated screws were respectively established. The hip joint contact force during walking gait calculated by a subject-specific musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model, was used as loads and boundary conditions for both finite element models. The stress and displacement distributions of the cannulated screws and the femur, the micromotion of the fracture surfaces of the femoral neck, and the overall stiffness were calculated and analyzed using finite element models. The biomechanical performance of the Magnesium-Titanium hybrid cannulated screws was evaluated., Results: The maximum stresses of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws and the conventional cannulated screws were 451.5 ​MPa and 476.8 ​MPa, respectively. The maximum stresses of the femur with the above different cannulated screws were 140.3 ​MPa and 164.8 ​MPa, respectively. The maximum displacement of the femur with the hybrid cannulated screws was 6.260 ​mm, lower than the femur with the conventional cannulated screws, which was 7.125 ​mm. The tangential micromotions in the two orthogonal directions at the fracture surface of the femoral neck with the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws were comparable to those with the conventional cannulated screws. The overall stiffness of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw system was 490.17 ​N/mm, higher than that of the conventional cannulated screw system, which was 433.92 ​N/mm., Conclusion: The magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw had superior mechanical strength and fixation stability for the treatment of the vertical femoral neck fractures, compared with those of the conventional cannulated screw, indicating that the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw has great potential as a new fixation strategy in future clinical applications.The translational potential of this article: This study highlights an innovative design of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. The novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw not only to provide sufficient mechanical strength and fixation stability but also to contribute to the promotion of fracture healing, which could provide a better treatment for the vertical femoral neck fractures, beneficially reducing the incidence of nonunion and reoperation rates., Competing Interests: The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

No consensus has been reached for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures (vFNFs). Recently, two alternative methods were invented to treat vFNFs, one of which is a new plate with a sliding groove, which was designed as a substitution of the medial buttress locking plate to combine with cannulated compression screws (CCS) for reducing the breakage possibility of the proximal locking screw during the bone healing. Another one is the femoral neck system (FNS), which was believed with biomechanical superiority. This study aims to compare the biomechanics of these two new implants with three previous methods via finite element analysis (FEA) to validate whether they are suitable for the treatment of vFNFs. Five 70-degree Pauwels type III transcervical FNFs (vFNFs, AO/OTA 31B2.3r) models were built and fixed by CCS augmented with the newly designed sliding groove buttress plate (CCS+BS) and FNS. For comparison, models fixed by three parallel cannulated compression screws (CCS), biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF), CCS augmented with a medial buttress locking plate (CCS+BL) were also built. A 2100N load was applied along with the mechanical axis. Parameters of the maximal stress as well as the maximal displacement of the implants and bone, the maximal relative displacement of interfragments, and the stiffness, were analyzed to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the five models. CCS+BS and CCS+BL showed stronger fixation strength with improved stiffness (1012.05N/mm, 1092.04N/mm), reduced maximal displacement of the implants (1.976mm, 1.838mm) and bone (2.075mm, 1.923mm), when compared with CCS (925.11N/mm, 2.158mm and 2.270mm) and BDSF (842.36N/mm, 2.299mm and 2.493mm). While FNS showed the weakest stiffness (593.22N/mm) and largest maximal displacement of the implants (3.234mm) and bone (3.540mm) among the five models. CCS+BS has a better biomechanical performance than CCS and BDSF, which offers a new choice to deal with vFNFs. The construction stability of FNS is weaker than CCS, BDSF, and CCS+BL, indicating that this method may not as stable as reported in the previous study. • Firstly, our study was the first one to elaborate the correct contact relationship of FNS in FEA, and another newly designed sliding groove medial buttress plate was also compared with three previous methods (CCS, BDSF, and CCS+BL), the results were meaningful. • Secondly, our study found that CCS+BS has a better biomechanical performance than CCS and BDSF, which offers a new choice to deal with vFNFs. The construction stability of FNS is weaker than CCS, BDSF, and CCS+BL, indicating that this method may not as stable as reported in the previous study. • Thirdly, previous studies have shown that the BDSF was more suitable than CCS for the treatment of femoral neck fracture. However, based on the results in this study, interfragmentary displacement of BDSF was observed larger than CSS showing that BDSF may not suitable in vertical femoral neck fractures. • Nowadays, femoral neck fractures are highly increasing, the cost-effective mothed is urgently under require. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]