Search

OBJECTIVE: In this study among patients with cancer in the palliative phase, we analysed whether assessing the symptom, which is causing the most trouble in the patient's every day life ('most troublesome' symptom) had added value apart from the presence and severity of symptoms, which are most commonly assessed in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with cancer (lung, gastro-intestinal, breast cancer) in the palliative phase from two non-academic hospitals were included in the study. Using the Symptom Monitor tool, 10 physical symptoms were assessed with regard to presence and severity. The Symptom Monitor has an extra added item indicating as the 'most troublesome' symptom. This item was monitored to determine whether it had added value apart from the presence of symptoms and 'most severe' symptom. The severity score on the indicated 'most troublesome' symptom was subtracted from the severity score of the 'most severe' symptom. The generated delta score of 0 indicated no added value, whereas a score of one or more indicated that the 'most troublesome' symptom would have been missed if not specifically asked for by the physician, because its severity was lower that the 'most severe' symptom. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients reported 590 symptoms to be present. In total, 227 symptoms were reported as 'most severe' symptom (n=138 patients). Among these, fatigue (n=52) and pain (n=24) were reported most frequently as 'most severe' symptom. In total, 134 patients indicated a symptom as 'most troublesome'. Fatigue (n=33; 25%) and pain (n=22; 16%) were also indicated by most of these patients as the 'most troublesome' symptom. One hundred and fifty-two comparisons could be made between the 'most severe' and the 'most troublesome' symptom. In 102 (67%) of the comparisons assessing the 'most troublesome' symptom had no added value: the score for 'most severe' symptom did not differ from the score for the 'most troublesome' symptom revealing a delta score of 0. In 23 times (15%) of the 152 comparisons made, the delta score was 1 and in 27 (18%) of the comparisons the delta score was 2 or more indicating that assessing the 'most troublesome' symptom substantially had added value. CONCLUSION: In patients in the palliative phase of their disease, extra attention for the 'most troublesome' symptom is needed. In our study, in almost 1/3 of the cases, this symptom would have been missed the physicians attention if not specifically asked for. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We recommend not only to assess the presence and severity of symptoms, but furthermore to assess the patient's 'most troublesome' symptom in addition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents a comprehensive overview of the problems patients experience in a palliative phase of cancer. A two-step qualitative method was used: in-depth interviews with patients and relatives (N=9 patients+7 relatives), followed by interviews (N=31patients+15 relatives) using a checklist to confirm and complete the picture. Quality of life and quality of care domains were addressed. Patients experienced problems in all of these palliative care domains, although individual patients may have experienced only a few problems. Fatigue, feelings of futility, reluctance to accept help, fear of suffering and the fear that help would not be available if needed, were common problems. Communication problems arose when a grudge against a GP had remained, or because one family member tried to spare the other a confrontation with his/her feelings of fear or grief. A comprehensive checklist of relevant problems is presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Early diagnosis of dementia benefits both patient and caregiver. Nevertheless, dementia in primary care is currently under-diagnosed. Some educational interventions developed to improve dementia diagnosis and management were successful in increasing the number of dementia diagnoses and in changing attitudes and knowledge of health care staff. However, none of these interventions focussed on collaboration between GPs and nurses in dementia care. We developed an EASYcare-based Dementia Training Program (DTP) aimed at stimulating collaboration in dementia primary care. We expect this program to increase the number of cognitive assessments and dementia diagnoses and to improve attitudes and knowledge of GPs and nurses. Methods The DTP is a complex educational intervention that consists of two workshops, a coaching program, access to an internet forum, and a Computerized Clinical Decision Support System on dementia diagnostics. One hundred duos of GPs and nurses will be recruited, from which 2/3 will be allocated to the intervention group and 1/3 to the control group. The effects of implementation of the DTP will be studied in a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Primary outcomes will be the number of cognitive assessments and dementia diagnoses in a period of 9 months following workshop participation. Secondary outcomes are measured on GP and nurse level: adherence to national guidelines for dementia, attitude, confidence and knowledge regarding dementia diagnosis and management; on patient level: number of emergency calls, visits and consultations and patient satisfaction; and on caregiver level: informal caregiver burden and satisfaction. Data will be collected from GPs' electronic medical records, self-registration forms and questionnaires. Statistical analysis will be performed using the MANOVA-method. Also, exploratory analyses will be performed, in order to gain insight into barriers and facilitators for implementation and the possible causal relations between the rate of success of the intervention components and the outcomes. Discussion We developed multifaceted dementia training programme. Novelties in this programme are the training in fixed collaborative duos and the inclusion of an individual coaching program. The intervention is designed according to international guidelines and educational standards. Exploratory analysis will reveal its successful elements. Selection bias and contamination may be threats to the reliability of future results of this trial. Nevertheless, the results of this trial may provide useful information for policy makers and developers of continuing medical education. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00459784

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Background: The immune system has been proposed to play a role in the link between social health and all-cause dementia risk. We explored cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between social health, immune system balance and plasma neurodegeneration markers in community-dwelling older adults, and explored whether the balance between innate and adaptive immunity mediates associations between social health and both cognition and total brain volume., Methods: Social health markers (social support, marital status, loneliness) were measured in the Rotterdam Study between 2002-2008. Immune system cell counts and balance were assessed repeatedly from 2002 to 2016 using white blood-cell-based indices and individual counts (granulocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)). Plasma neurodegeneration biomarkers (amyloid-β40, amyloid-β42, total tau and neurofilament light chain) were measured once from blood samples collected between 2002-2008. Global cognitive function and total brain volume (MRI) were measured at the follow-up visit between 2009-2014. We used linear mixed models to study longitudinal associations and performed causal mediation analyses., Results: In 8374 adults (mean age 65.7, 57 % female), never married participants (n = 394) had higher GLR, PLR and SII compared to married peers at baseline and during follow-up, indicating imbalance towards innate immunity. Being never married was associated with higher plasma amyloid-β40, and being widowed or divorced with higher plasma total tau levels at baseline. Widowed or divorced males, but not females, had higher GLR, PLR and SII at baseline. Higher social support was associated with lower PLR in females, but higher PLR in males. Loneliness was not associated with any of the immune system balance ratios. Never married males had higher levels of all plasma neurodegeneration markers at baseline. Immune system balance did not mediate associations between social health and cognition or total brain volume, but does interact with marital status., Conclusion: This study indicates that marital status is associated with blood-based immune system markers toward innate immunity and higher levels of plasma neurodegeneration markers. This is particularly evident for never married or previously married male older adults compared to married or female peers., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Poor social health has been linked to a risk of neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuroimaging studies have shown associations between social health and global white matter microstructural integrity. We aimed to identify which white matter tracts are involved in these associations., Methods: Social health markers (loneliness, perceived social support, and partnership status) and white matter microstructural integrity of 15 white matter tracts (identified with probabilistic tractography after diffusion magnetic resonance imaging) were collected for 3352 participants (mean age 58.4 years, 54.9% female) from 2002 to 2008 in the Rotterdam Study. Cross-sectional associations were studied using multivariable linear regression., Results: Loneliness was associated with higher mean diffusivity (MD) in the superior thalamic radiation and the parahippocampal part of the cingulum (standardized mean difference for both tracts: 0.21, 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.34). Better perceived social support was associated with lower MD in the forceps minor (standardized mean difference per point increase in social support: -0.06, 95% CI, -0.09 to -0.03), inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, and uncinate fasciculus. In male participants, better perceived social support was associated with lower MD in the forceps minor, and not having a partner was associated with lower fractional anisotropy in the forceps minor. Loneliness was associated with higher MD in the superior thalamic radiation in female participants only., Conclusions: Social health was associated with tract-specific white matter microstructure. Loneliness was associated with lower integrity of limbic and sensorimotor tracts, whereas better perceived social support was associated with higher integrity of association and commissural tracts, indicating that social health domains involve distinct neural pathways of the brain., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Social health markers have been linked to the development of dementia. We hypothesize that social health affects brain structure and consequently influences cognitive function. We aim to elucidate the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between social health markers and structural brain changes in older adults in the general population., Methods: Social health markers (loneliness, perceived social support, marital status) were assessed in the Rotterdam Study from 2002 to 2008. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was performed repeatedly between 2005 and 2015 for 3737 participants to obtain brain volumetrics, cerebral small vessel disease markers, and white matter microstructural integrity as measures of brain structure. Cross-sectional associations between social health and brain structure were studied using multivariable linear and logistic regression models. Longitudinal associations between baseline social health and changes in brain structure were examined using linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations., Results: Loneliness was associated with smaller white matter volume at baseline (mean difference = -4.63 mL, 95% CI = -8.46 to -0.81). Better perceived social support was associated with larger total brain volume and gray matter volume at baseline and a less steep decrease in total brain volume over time. Better social support was associated with higher global fractional anisotropy and lower mean diffusivity at baseline. Participants who had never been married had a smaller total brain volume (mean difference = -8.27 mL, 95% CI = -13.16 to -3.39) at baseline than married peers., Conclusions: Social health is associated with brain structure. Better perceived social support at baseline was associated with better brain structure over time., (Copyright © 2021 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and accompanying lockdown restrictions impacted social life significantly. We studied associations of sociodemographic factors, mental and social health markers, and brain structure with social health trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic., Design: Prospective longitudinal population-based cohort study., Setting: Community-dwelling inhabitants of Rotterdam, the Netherlands., Participants: Repeated questionnaires including questions on social health were sent to Rotterdam Study participants from April 2020 onwards. Social health data at study baseline were available for 5017 participants (mean age: 68.7 ± 11.3; 56.9% women)., Measurements: Determinants were assessed in routine Rotterdam Study follow-up (1990-2020), including global brain volumes in a subset of participants (N = 1720). We applied linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations to quantify associations between determinants and trajectories of loneliness, perceived social isolation and social connectedness over three time points from April 22nd to July 31st 2020., Results: Loneliness prevalence was 27.9% in April 2020 versus 12.6% prepandemic. Social isolation (baseline mean 4.7 ± 2.4) and loneliness scores (baseline mean 4.9 ± 1.5) decreased over time, whereas social connectedness trajectories remained stable. Depressive symptoms, female sex, prepandemic loneliness, living alone, and not owning a pet were independently associated with lower social connectedness and higher social isolation and loneliness at COVID-19 baseline, but recovery of social health was similar for all determinants. Larger intracranial volume was associated with higher social connectedness., Conclusions: Despite baseline differences for specific determinants, older adults showed similar recovery of loneliness and social isolation alongside stable social connectedness over time during the pandemic. Social health is multidimensional, especially during a global health crisis.