Search

Your search keyword '"Verheyen, Steven"' showing total 325 results
Start Over Author "Verheyen, Steven"
325 results on '"Verheyen, Steven"'

1. Individual Differences in Concept Dominance

Author

Louter, Willem Jacob, Jabbari, Sam, Constantinou Juhasz, Sandra Blythin, and Verheyen, Steven

Subjects
Psychology, Concepts and categories, Language and thought, Representation, Semantic memory
Abstract

The literature on conceptual combination has thus far been limited to research at the aggregate level investigating adjective-noun and noun-noun combinations. One well-established phenomenon within this literature is that of concept dominance (Hampton, 1988), which is the finding that the relative contribution of constituent concepts (for example sport or game) to their conjunction (sport that is also a game) is often very unequal. This exploratory study investigated individual differences in how people understand adjective-adjective-noun combinations, such as long blue coat. Participants rated images of coats varying along the perceptual dimensions of length and color for typicality in two different conjunctions, namely long blue coat and long purple coat. We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) to construct an aggregate coat space from similarity data collected with the Spatial Arrangement Method (SpAM). Using external unfolding, we modeled participants' typicality judgements by representing their individual typicality data as vectors within the aggregate MDS space, such that orthogonal projections from the coats onto the vectors represent their perceived typicality in the conjunctions. We did not find strong evidence for concept dominance at the aggregate level; however, we did find evidence for concept dominance at the individual level, with marked individual differences in the extent of dominance and which dimension was dominant. The validation of external unfolding for research into conceptual combination comes with new research possibilities, several of which are proposed.

Published
2024

2. Does Taking Photographs Impair Your Memory? The Role of Attentional Disengagement

Author

Braun, Simon, Croes, Marc, Vaitkunaite, Rugile, and Verheyen, Steven

Subjects
Psychology, Attention, Human Factors, Human-computer interaction, Memory
Abstract

The photo-taking-impairment effect refers to the detrimental impact photo taking has on one's memory for the photographed object. We explored the role of two mechanisms that have been said to underlie the effect, namely offloading and attentional disengagement. In this online study 107 undergraduate students were shown 3x5 paintings and were instructed to simply observe them, take a picture that would be available for later usage, or take a picture and delete it. Afterwards, they were presented with a visual details multiple-choice test. It was expected that if attentional disengagement was the mechanism underlying the photo-taking-impairment effect, then the effect would not be present in the current study. This expectation was due to the non-distracting nature of the photo taking task that was used in the study. The results were in line with the expectations and did not indicate the presence of the photo-taking-impairment effect. Consequentially, it supported the hypothesis that attentional disengagement, rather than offloading, is the mechanism underlying this effect.

Published
2024

3. ChatGPT and the Illusion of Explanatory Depth

Author

Elsayed, Yomn and Verheyen, Steven

Subjects
Artificial Intelligence, Education, Psychology, Externally-supported cognition, Human-computer interaction
Abstract

The recent surge in the use of AI-powered chatbots such as ChatGPT has led to new challenges in academia. These chatbots can enable student plagiarism and the submission of misleading content, undermining educational objectives. With plagiarism detectors unreliable in the face of this issue, educational institutions have been struggling to update their policies apace. This study assesses the effectiveness of sending warning messages - a common strategy used to discourage unethical use of ChatGPT - and investigates the use of the illusion of explanatory depth (IOED) paradigm as an alternative intervention. An international sample of students was asked to rate their understanding of, likelihood to use, and moral stance toward ChatGPT-generated text in assignments both before and after either reading a cautionary university message or explaining how ChatGPT works. Results showed that the explanation task did lead to the expected reduction in ratings of understanding, but despite this, neither moral acceptability nor likelihood to use decreased along with it. Similarly, reading the cautionary message neither resulted in a change in likelihood to use nor in moral acceptability, although it unexpectedly increased ratings of understanding. The results suggest that tackling students' understanding of ChatGPT is insufficient when it comes to deterring its unethical use, and that future interventions might want to have students reflect on moral issues surrounding the use of AI-powered chatbots.

Published
2024

5. On the Optimality of Vagueness: 'Around', 'Between', and the Gricean Maxims

Author

Egré, Paul, Spector, Benjamin, Mortier, Adèle, and Verheyen, Steven

Subjects
Computer Science - Computation and Language, 91F20, 62C10, 94-10, 94A17, 68T37
Abstract

Why is ordinary language vague? We argue that in contexts in which a cooperative speaker is not perfectly informed about the world, the use of vague expressions can offer an optimal tradeoff between truthfulness (Gricean Quality) and informativeness (Gricean Quantity). Focusing on expressions of approximation such as "around", which are semantically vague, we show that they allow the speaker to convey indirect probabilistic information, in a way that can give the listener a more accurate representation of the information available to the speaker than any more precise expression would (intervals of the form "between"). That is, vague sentences can be more informative than their precise counterparts. We give a probabilistic treatment of the interpretation of "around", and offer a model for the interpretation and use of "around"-statements within the Rational Speech Act (RSA) framework. In our account the shape of the speaker's distribution matters in ways not predicted by the Lexical Uncertainty model standardly used in the RSA framework for vague predicates. We use our approach to draw further lessons concerning the semantic flexibility of vague expressions and their irreducibility to more precise meanings.

Published
2020

6. Large-scale cross-societal examination of real- and minimal-group biases

Author

Yang, Xin, primary, Schulz, Jonathan Friedemann, additional, Schmidt, Kathleen, additional, Kenny, Adam R, additional, Pfuhl, Gerit, additional, Gjoneska, Biljana, additional, Dalgar, Ilker, additional, Lewis, Savannah C, additional, Exner, Anna, additional, Lander, Karen, additional, Becker, Maja, additional, Du, Hongfei, additional, Johri, Akshay, additional, Selcuk, Emre, additional, Gallyamova, Albina, additional, Calluso, Cinzia, additional, Reggev, Niv, additional, Vranka, Marek Albert, additional, Acar, Oguz A., additional, Palma, Tomás A, additional, kocur, miroslaw, additional, Oliveros, Juan C., additional, Montefinese, Maria, additional, Wilton, Leigh Solano, additional, Zdybek, Przemysław, additional, Pfattheicher, Stefan, additional, Akkas, Handan, additional, Autin, Frederique, additional, Sorokowska, Agnieszka, additional, Janssen, Steve M. J., additional, March, David Scott, additional, Young, Danielle Magan, additional, Valentova, Jaroslava Varella, additional, Tasbas, Esra H. Oguz, additional, Bukun, Mehmet Fatih, additional, Giammusso, Isabella, additional, Brandt, Mark John, additional, Stewart, Suzanne, additional, Couto, Cleno, additional, Simon, Derek, additional, Cutler, Jo, additional, Prokosch, Marjorie L., additional, Sjåstad, Hallgeir, additional, Manunta, Efisio, additional, Whyte, Stephen, additional, Marsh, Abigail, additional, Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta, additional, Jaeger, Bastian, additional, Morvinski, Coby, additional, Primbs, Maximilian, additional, Akil, Atakan M., additional, Kapoor, Hansika, additional, Barzykowski, Krystian, additional, Ghai, Sakshi, additional, Moreau, David, additional, Seehuus, Martin, additional, Kowal, Marta, additional, Evans, Thomas Rhys, additional, Hill, Kimberley, additional, Calvillo, Dustin P, additional, Wiechert, Sera, additional, Afhami, Reza, additional, Hoyer, Karlijn, additional, Korbmacher, Max, additional, Elbaek, Christian T., additional, Alsuhaibani, Zainab, additional, Pronizius, Ekaterina, additional, Cui, Qianqain, additional, Cundiff, Jenny, additional, Taghipanahi, Alireza, additional, Bjornsdottir, R. Thora, additional, Baskin, Ernest, additional, Ergiyen, Tolga, additional, Metin-Orta, Irem, additional, Collins, W. Matthew, additional, Bø, Simen, additional, Marinucci, Marco, additional, Baker, Bradley James, additional, Özdoğru, Asil Ali, additional, Anne, Michele, additional, Standage, Martyn, additional, Tullett, Alexa Mary, additional, Milfont, Taciano L, additional, Flynn, Francis, additional, Zidkova, Radka, additional, Ruiz-Fernandez, Susana, additional, Sachs, Tobias, additional, Bilancini, Ennio, additional, Verheyen, Steven, additional, Massoni, Sébastien, additional, Wen, Jiahui, additional, Camargo, Andrés, additional, Wang, Yilin Andre, additional, Zhou, Steven, additional, Peetz, Hannah Katharina, additional, Grigoryev, Dmitry, additional, Ghasemi, Omid, additional, Westgate, Erin Corwin, additional, Goh, Jin X., additional, Sutherland, Clare, additional, Boucher, Leanne, additional, Grigoryan, Lusine, additional, Paltoglou, Aspa, additional, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., additional, Sacco, Donald F., additional, Thomas, Andrew G., additional, Haeffel, Gerald, additional, Davis, William E., additional, Mandalaywala, Tara M, additional, Cruz, Francisco, additional, Ross, Robert M, additional, Jiang, Xiaoming, additional, Studzinska, Anna, additional, Dumbravă, Andrei, additional, Misiak, Michał, additional, Tran, Ulrich S., additional, Felisberti, Fatima Maria, additional, Nagy, Tamas, additional, Gunaydin, Gul, additional, Buchanan, Erin Michelle, additional, Miranda, Jacob Francisco, additional, Behnke, Maciej, additional, Akin, Karen, additional, Berkessel, Jana, additional, Johnson, David Charles, additional, Morariu, Roxana E., additional, Wu, Yang, additional, Godbersen, Hendrik, additional, Edlund, John, additional, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, additional, Martin, Doug, additional, Salvador, Cristina, additional, Norman, Jasmine B, additional, Batres, Carlota, additional, Kutuk, Bahtim, additional, Szumowska, Ewa, additional, Storage, Daniel, additional, Bouguettaya, Ayoub, additional, Lins, Samuel, additional, Voracek, Martin, additional, Trémolière, Bastien, additional, Cyrus-Lai, Wilson, additional, Alzahawi, Shilaan, additional, Tavel, Petr, additional, Anderson, Leif Douglas, additional, Röer, Jan Philipp, additional, Malinakova, Klara, additional, KARABABA, Alper, additional, Walczak, Radoslaw B., additional, Ribeiro, Gianni, additional, Sarı, Erkin, additional, Pypno, Katarzyna, additional, Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola, additional, Travaglino, Giovanni A., additional, Neta, Maital, additional, Vaidis, David C., additional, Lu, Jackson G., additional, Tatachari, Srinivasan, additional, Camgöz, Selin Metin, additional, Lockwood, Patricia, additional, Mitkidis, Panagiotis, additional, Lin, Wenzheng, additional, Rathje, Steve, additional, van Lent, Tjits, additional, Greijdanus, Hedy, additional, Faure, Ruddy, additional, Lamm, Claus, additional, Brick, Cameron, additional, Zhao, Xian, additional, Aquino, Sibele Dias, additional, Ulloa Fulgeri, Jose Luis, additional, Walker, Bradley, additional, Malecki, W. P., additional, Lou, Nigel Mantou, additional, Pizziol, Veronica, additional, Kuzminska, Anna O., additional, Schepisi, Michael, additional, Adıgüzel, Arca, additional, Karadeniz, Gizem, additional, Yücel, Emine, additional, Isloi, Chris, additional, Chwiłkowska, Patrycja, additional, Yu, Zhaoliang, additional, Fay, Nicolas, additional, Papaioannou, Kostas, additional, Peker, Mhmet, additional, Huang, Guanxiong, additional, El-Haddad, Rita W., additional, Verschuere, Bruno, additional, Meier, Zdenek, additional, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, additional, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, additional, Ciesla, Kylie L, additional, Stieger, Stefan, additional, Çoksan, Sami, additional, Bijlstra, Gijsbert, additional, Alves, Sara Gouveia, additional, Hartanto, Andree, additional, Mallik, Peter Robert, additional, Jami, Waleed, additional, Chen, Rong, additional, Fellnhofer, Katharina, additional, Marcu, Gabriela Mariana, additional, Batalha, Luisa, additional, Kocalar, Halil Emre, additional, Vieira, Luc, additional, Gleibs, Ilka Helene, additional, Sharifian, MohammadHasan, additional, Hadjisolomou, Stavros P., additional, Riva, Paolo, additional, Sirota, Miroslav, additional, Novák, Lukas, additional, Sorokowski, Piotr, additional, Li, Yansong, additional, and Dunham, Yarrow, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

Author

Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N., Govaart, Gisela H., Norris, Emma, O’Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J., Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R., Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L., Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J., Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A., Lonsdorf, Tina B., Lim, Michele C., Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B., Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F., Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J., Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R., Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A., Wolska, Julia K., Henderson, Emma L., Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G., Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M., Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L., Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K., Baum, Myriam A., Williams, Emily A., Assaneea, Asma A., Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G., Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M. J., Melia, Claire R., Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H., Pickering, Jade S., Evans, Thomas R., Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A., Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G., Rinke, Eike M., Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E., Blake, Ashley R., Cockcroft, Jamie P., Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M., Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X., Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J., Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T., Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E., Iley, Bethan J., Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J., Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F., Millager, Ryan A., Fox, Kerry J., AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R., Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A., Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., and Aczel, Balazs

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Language-Specificity in Monolingual and Bilingual Later Lexical Development

Author

White, Anne, Malt, Barbara C., Verheyen, Steven, and Storms, Gert

Abstract

Although children may productively use concrete nouns after limited exposure, complete mastery of adult-like patterns of noun usage can take up to 14 years. We evaluated whether a transition from universal to language-specific naming is part of the refinement in later lexical development, and we compared how this refinement plays out in monolingual versus bilingual children. We collected free naming data for pictures of nearly 200 household containers from 499 Belgian children, aged 5 to 14, and adults, raised with either (a) only French, (b) only Dutch, or (c) both French and Dutch. Both monolingual and bilingual 5-year olds produced largely shared naming patterns, and for both groups, naming patterns became more language-specific and also more consistent within-language over time. However, monolinguals and bilinguals diverged in some aspects of their developmental profiles. Monolinguals started to introduce language-specificities to their naming pattern beginning at age 8, but differentiation between languages did not emerge for bilinguals until age 12. Consensus on name choice increased across ages for both groups, but bilinguals showed more consensus at all ages, reflecting smaller vocabularies and less differentiation. Thus monolingual and bilingual children follow a similar trajectory from shared to language-specific patterns of word use, but bilinguals differentiate later and for only some words. This study demonstrates that a transition from shared to language-specific naming is a key aspect of later lexical development, but the developmental course differs in detail between monolingual and bilingual children.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

Author

Röseler, Lukas, primary, Kaiser, Leonard, additional, Doetsch, Christopher Albert, additional, Klett, Noah, additional, Seida, Christian, additional, Schütz, Astrid, additional, Aczel, Balazs, additional, Adelina, Nadia, additional, Agostini, Valeria, additional, Alarie, Samuel, additional, Albayarak-Aydemir, Nihan, additional, Aldoh, Alaa, additional, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., additional, Azevedo, Flavio, additional, Baker, Bradley James, additional, Barth, Charlotte Lilian, additional, Beitner, Julia, additional, Brick, Cameron, additional, Brohmer, Hilmar, additional, Chandrashekar, Subramanya Prasad, additional, Chung, Kai Li, additional, Cockcroft, Jamie Philip, additional, Cummins, Jamie, additional, Diveica, Veronica, additional, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, additional, efendic, emir, additional, Elsherif, Mahmoud Medhat, additional, Evans, Thomas Rhys, additional, Feldman, Gilad, additional, Fillon, Adrien Alejandro, additional, Förster, Nico, additional, Frese, Joris, additional, Genschow, Oliver, additional, Giannouli, Vaitsa, additional, Gjoneska, Biljana, additional, Gnambs, Timo, additional, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, additional, Graham, Christopher James, additional, Hartmann, Helena, additional, Haviva, Clove, additional, Herderich, Alina, additional, Hilbert, Leon Paul, additional, Holgado, Darias, additional, Hussey, Ian, additional, Ilchovska, Zlatomira, additional, Kalandadze, Tamara, additional, Karhulahti, Veli-Matti, additional, Kasseckert, Leon, additional, Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren, additional, Koppold, Alina, additional, Korbmacher, Max, additional, Kulke, Louisa, additional, Kuper, Niclas, additional, LaPlume, Annalise Aleta, additional, Leech, Gavin, additional, Lohkamp, Feline, additional, Lou, Nigel Mantou, additional, Lynott, Dermot, additional, Maier, Maximilian, additional, Montefinese, Maria, additional, Meier, Maria, additional, Moreau, David, additional, Mrkva, Kellen, additional, Nemcova, Monika, additional, Oomen, Danna, additional, Packheiser, Julian, additional, Pandey, Shubham, additional, Papenmeier, Frank, additional, Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola, additional, Pavlov, Yuri G., additional, Pavlović, Zoran, additional, Pennington, Charlotte Rebecca, additional, Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, additional, Plomp, Willemijn, additional, Plonski, Paul E., additional, Pronizius, Ekaterina, additional, Pua, Andrew A., additional, Pypno, Katarzyna, additional, Rausch, Manuel, additional, Rebholz, Tobias R., additional, Richert, Elena, additional, Röer, Jan Philipp, additional, Ross, Robert M, additional, Schmidt, Kathleen, additional, Skvortsova, Aleksandrina, additional, Sperl, Matthias F.J., additional, Tan, Alvin Wei Ming, additional, Thürmer, J. Lukas, additional, Tołopiło, Aleksandra, additional, vanpaemel, wolf, additional, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, additional, Verheyen, Steven, additional, Wallrich, Lukas, additional, Weber, Lucia, additional, Wolska, Julia, additional, Zaneva, Mirela, additional, and Zhang, Yikang, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Later lexical development in bilinguals

Author

White, Anne, Malt, Barbara, Verheyen, Steven, and Storms, Gert

Abstract

We investigated object naming in Dutch-French bilingual children to determine the developmental trajectory of thecross-language convergence in naming patterns shown by bilingual adults. We collected name choices for nearly 200 commonhousehold containers from French-Dutch simultaneous bilinguals of 6 different age groups, along with monolingual controlgroups. Multidimensional scaling analysis on a group level suggests that convergence is present in bilinguals at all ages. Onthe individual level, pairwise between-subject correlations show that monolingual naming patterns in different languages showa remarkable correspondence at younger ages. Between age 5 and adulthood, the naming patterns of monolingual childrendemonstrate increasing divergence as they learn the language specificities of their L1. Bilingual children, however, maintain afully converged naming pattern up till age 10. They start learning some language-specific idiosyncrasies from age 12 onwards,but never to the extent of monolinguals. We propose a gradual divergence perspective for bilingual lexical development.

Published
2017

13. A multilab replication of the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of cognitive dissonance

Author

Vaidis, David C., Sleegers, Willem W. A., Leeuwen, Florian van, DeMarree, Kenneth G., Sætrevik, Bjørn, Ross, Robert M., Schmidt, Kathleen, Protzko, John, Morvinski, Coby, Ghasemi, Omid, Roberts, Andrew J., Stone, Jeff, Bran, Alexandre, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Gunsoy, Ceren, Moussaoui, Lisa S., Smith, Andrew R., Nugier, Armelle, Fayant, Marie-Pierre, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Appiah, Obed K., Arbige, Spencer, Aubert-Teillaud, Benjamin, Bialobrzeska, Olga, Bordel, Stéphanie, Boudjemadi, Valerian, Brohmer, Hilmar, Cabooter, Quinn, Chahir, Mehdi, Chassang, Ianis, Chatard, Armand, Chou, Yu Yang, Chung, Sungeun, Cristea, Mioara, Daga, Joséphine, Depow, Gregory J., Desrichard, Olivier, Dubrov, Dmitrii, Evans, Thomas R., Falkowicz, Séverine, Ferreira, Sylvain, Figureau, Tim, Fointiat, Valérie, Friedrich, Théo, Gashkova, Anastasia, Girandola, Fabien, Granjon, Marine, Grigoryev, Dmitry, Gunaydin, Gul, Güzel, Şevval, Hazrati, Mahsa, Helmy, Mai, Ikeda, Ayumi, Inzlicht, Michael, Jaubert, Sara, Kasanov, Dauren, Khoddami, Mohammad Mohsen, Kim, Taenyun, Kiyokawa, Kiyoshi, Kodapanakkal, Rabia I., Kosachenko, Alexandra, Maedge, Kortney, Mahaney, John H., Martinie, Marie-Amélie, Mascheretti, Vitor N., Matsuda, Yoriko, Mauduy, Maxime, Mauny, Nicolas, Metzen, Armand, Moreno-Bella, Eva, Moya, Miguel, Nadarajah, Kévin, Nejat, Pegah, Norman, Elisabeth, Okten, Irmak Olcaysoy, Özdoğru, Asil A., Ozer, Ceyda, Padial-Rojas, Elena, Pavlov, Yuri G., Perusquia-Hernandez, Monica, Proost, Dora, Rabinovitch, Aleksandra, Rohmer, Odile, Selcuk, Emre, Sénémeaud, Cécile, Shani, Yaniv, Shmeleva, Elena A., Simoens, Emmelie, Smith, Kaitlin A., Somat, Alain, Song, Hayeon, Sonmez, Fatih, Souchet, Lionel, Taylor, John J., Beest, Ilja van, Linden, Nicolas Van der, Verheyen, Steven, Verschuere, Bruno, Vezirian, Kevin, Vieira, Luc, Wiechert, Sera, Willis, Guillermo B., Wollast, Robin, Xia, Ji, Yamada, Yuki, Yoshimura, Naoto, Priolo, Daniel, Vaidis, David C., Sleegers, Willem W. A., Leeuwen, Florian van, DeMarree, Kenneth G., Sætrevik, Bjørn, Ross, Robert M., Schmidt, Kathleen, Protzko, John, Morvinski, Coby, Ghasemi, Omid, Roberts, Andrew J., Stone, Jeff, Bran, Alexandre, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Gunsoy, Ceren, Moussaoui, Lisa S., Smith, Andrew R., Nugier, Armelle, Fayant, Marie-Pierre, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Appiah, Obed K., Arbige, Spencer, Aubert-Teillaud, Benjamin, Bialobrzeska, Olga, Bordel, Stéphanie, Boudjemadi, Valerian, Brohmer, Hilmar, Cabooter, Quinn, Chahir, Mehdi, Chassang, Ianis, Chatard, Armand, Chou, Yu Yang, Chung, Sungeun, Cristea, Mioara, Daga, Joséphine, Depow, Gregory J., Desrichard, Olivier, Dubrov, Dmitrii, Evans, Thomas R., Falkowicz, Séverine, Ferreira, Sylvain, Figureau, Tim, Fointiat, Valérie, Friedrich, Théo, Gashkova, Anastasia, Girandola, Fabien, Granjon, Marine, Grigoryev, Dmitry, Gunaydin, Gul, Güzel, Şevval, Hazrati, Mahsa, Helmy, Mai, Ikeda, Ayumi, Inzlicht, Michael, Jaubert, Sara, Kasanov, Dauren, Khoddami, Mohammad Mohsen, Kim, Taenyun, Kiyokawa, Kiyoshi, Kodapanakkal, Rabia I., Kosachenko, Alexandra, Maedge, Kortney, Mahaney, John H., Martinie, Marie-Amélie, Mascheretti, Vitor N., Matsuda, Yoriko, Mauduy, Maxime, Mauny, Nicolas, Metzen, Armand, Moreno-Bella, Eva, Moya, Miguel, Nadarajah, Kévin, Nejat, Pegah, Norman, Elisabeth, Okten, Irmak Olcaysoy, Özdoğru, Asil A., Ozer, Ceyda, Padial-Rojas, Elena, Pavlov, Yuri G., Perusquia-Hernandez, Monica, Proost, Dora, Rabinovitch, Aleksandra, Rohmer, Odile, Selcuk, Emre, Sénémeaud, Cécile, Shani, Yaniv, Shmeleva, Elena A., Simoens, Emmelie, Smith, Kaitlin A., Somat, Alain, Song, Hayeon, Sonmez, Fatih, Souchet, Lionel, Taylor, John J., Beest, Ilja van, Linden, Nicolas Van der, Verheyen, Steven, Verschuere, Bruno, Vezirian, Kevin, Vieira, Luc, Wiechert, Sera, Willis, Guillermo B., Wollast, Robin, Xia, Ji, Yamada, Yuki, Yoshimura, Naoto, and Priolo, Daniel

Abstract

According to cognitive-dissonance theory, performing counterattitudinal behavior produces a state of dissonance that people are motivated to resolve, usually by changing their attitude to be in line with their behavior. One of the most popular experimental paradigms used to produce such attitude change is the induced-compliance paradigm. Despite its popularity, the replication crisis in social psychology and other fields, as well as methodological limitations associated with the paradigm, raise concerns about the robustness of classic studies in this literature. We therefore conducted a multilab constructive replication of the induced-compliance paradigm based on Croyle and Cooper (Experiment 1). In a total of 39 labs from 19 countries and 14 languages, participants (N = 4,898) were assigned to one of three conditions: writing a counterattitudinal essay under high choice, writing a counterattitudinal essay under low choice, or writing a neutral essay under high choice. The primary analyses failed to support the core hypothesis: No significant difference in attitude was observed after writing a counterattitudinal essay under high choice compared with low choice. However, we did observe a significant difference in attitude after writing a counterattitudinal essay compared with writing a neutral essay. Secondary analyses revealed the pattern of results to be robust to data exclusions, lab variability, and attitude assessment. Additional exploratory analyses were conducted to test predictions from cognitive-dissonance theory. Overall, the results call into question whether the induced-compliance paradigm provides robust evidence for cognitive dissonance.

Published
2024

15. A Multilab Replication of the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance

Author

Vaidis, David C., primary, Sleegers, Willem W. A., additional, van Leeuwen, Florian, additional, DeMarree, Kenneth G., additional, Sætrevik, Bjørn, additional, Ross, Robert M., additional, Schmidt, Kathleen, additional, Protzko, John, additional, Morvinski, Coby, additional, Ghasemi, Omid, additional, Roberts, Andrew J., additional, Stone, Jeff, additional, Bran, Alexandre, additional, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, additional, Gunsoy, Ceren, additional, Moussaoui, Lisa S., additional, Smith, Andrew R., additional, Nugier, Armelle, additional, Fayant, Marie-Pierre, additional, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., additional, Appiah, Obed K., additional, Arbige, Spencer, additional, Aubert-Teillaud, Benjamin, additional, Bialobrzeska, Olga, additional, Bordel, Stéphanie, additional, Boudjemadi, Valerian, additional, Brohmer, Hilmar, additional, Cabooter, Quinn, additional, Chahir, Mehdi, additional, Chassang, Ianis, additional, Chatard, Armand, additional, Chou, Yu Yang, additional, Chung, Sungeun, additional, Cristea, Mioara, additional, Daga, Joséphine, additional, Depow, Gregory J., additional, Desrichard, Olivier, additional, Dubrov, Dmitrii, additional, Evans, Thomas R., additional, Falkowicz, Séverine, additional, Ferreira, Sylvain, additional, Figureau, Tim, additional, Fointiat, Valérie, additional, Friedrich, Théo, additional, Gashkova, Anastasia, additional, Girandola, Fabien, additional, Granjon, Marine, additional, Grigoryev, Dmitry, additional, Gunaydin, Gul, additional, Güzel, Şevval, additional, Hazrati, Mahsa, additional, Helmy, Mai, additional, Ikeda, Ayumi, additional, Inzlicht, Michael, additional, Jaubert, Sara, additional, Kasanov, Dauren, additional, Khoddami, Mohammad Mohsen, additional, Kim, Taenyun, additional, Kiyokawa, Kiyoshi, additional, Kodapanakkal, Rabia I., additional, Kosachenko, Alexandra, additional, Maedge, Kortney, additional, Mahaney, John H., additional, Martinie, Marie-Amélie, additional, Mascheretti, Vitor N., additional, Matsuda, Yoriko, additional, Mauduy, Maxime, additional, Mauny, Nicolas, additional, Metzen, Armand, additional, Moreno-Bella, Eva, additional, Moya, Miguel, additional, Nadarajah, Kévin, additional, Nejat, Pegah, additional, Norman, Elisabeth, additional, Olcaysoy Okten, Irmak, additional, Özdoğru, Asil A., additional, Ozer, Ceyda, additional, Padial-Rojas, Elena, additional, Pavlov, Yuri G., additional, Perusquia-Hernandez, Monica, additional, Proost, Dora, additional, Rabinovitch, Aleksandra, additional, Rohmer, Odile, additional, Selcuk, Emre, additional, Sénémeaud, Cécile, additional, Shani, Yaniv, additional, Shmeleva, Elena A., additional, Simoens, Emmelie, additional, Smith, Kaitlin A., additional, Somat, Alain, additional, Song, Hayeon, additional, Sonmez, Fatih, additional, Souchet, Lionel, additional, Taylor, John J., additional, van Beest, Ilja, additional, Van der Linden, Nicolas, additional, Verheyen, Steven, additional, Verschuere, Bruno, additional, Vezirian, Kevin, additional, Vieira, Luc, additional, Wiechert, Sera, additional, Willis, Guillermo B., additional, Wollast, Robin, additional, Xia, Ji, additional, Yamada, Yuki, additional, Yoshimura, Naoto, additional, and Priolo, Daniel, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Comparing predictions of lexical norm data obtained using word associations andword collocation

Author

Vankrunkelsven, Hendrik, Verheyen, Steven, Deyne, Simon De, and Storms, Gert

Subjects
Comparing predictions of lexical norm data obtained using word associations andword collocation
Abstract

We compared the quality of prediction of word variables based on a Dutch word association and text corpus. Wederived estimates for: valence, arousal, dominance, concreteness and age of acquisition (AoA) for 2831 words. Based on thesimilarity between words we: (1) used projections on a dimension identified as the variable in question in a multidimensionalrepresentation, (2) used the k-nearest neighbors values, weighted according to their proximity. Estimates prevailed when basedon word associations. Differences between the predictions of the two methods were small. Based on the word association corpusit yielded correlations of .92, .85, and .85, for valence, arousal, and dominance, respectively. Its corresponding correlationsbased on the text corpus were .80, .74, and .67. For concreteness and AoA, both the association and the text corpus yieldedcorrelations of .88 and .73, respectively. This suggests word associations are better at capturing human ratings of affective wordvariables.

Published
2016

17. Between versus Within-Language Differences in Linguistic Categorization

Author

White, Anne, Storms, Gert, Malt, Barbara C., and Verheyen, Steven

Subjects
artifact categories, cross-linguistic differences, semantic variation, vagueness
Abstract

Cross-linguistic research has shown that boundaries forlexical categories differ from language to language. The aimof this study is to explore these differences between languagesin relation to the categorization differences within a language.Monolingual Dutch- (N=400) and French-speaking (N=300)Belgian adults provided lexical category judgments for threelexical categories that are roughly equivalent in Dutch andFrench. Each category was represented by good, borderline,and bad examples. A mixture modeling approach enabled usto identify latent groups of categorizers within a language andto evaluate cross-linguistic variation in relation to within-language variation. We found complex patterns of lexicalvariation within as well as between language groups. Evenwithin a seemingly homogeneous group of speakers sharingthe same mother tongue, latent groups of categorizers displaya variability that resembles patterns of lexical variation foundat a cross-linguistic level of comparison.

Published
2016

19. Development of Cross-Language Lexical Influence: Divergence, Not Convergence

Author

White, Anne, Malt, Barbara C., Verheyen, Steven, and Storms, Gert

Abstract

Storms, Ameel, and Malt [2015. "Development of Cross-language Lexical Influence." "International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism" 18: 529-547] compared the development of naming patterns in monolingual and bilingual children. They concluded that bilinguals' naming patterns in their two languages become increasingly similar with age and are thus converging. In this commentary, we argue that taking into account younger participants' smaller vocabulary and greater variability in names for individual objects changes the paper's conclusions: bilingual naming patterns are found to diverge with age.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. Evidence for widespread thematic structure in the mental lexicon

Author

De Deyne, Simon, Verheyen, Steven, Perfors, Amy, and Navarro, Daniel J

Subjects
semantic networks, thematic roles, taxonomies, clustering.
Abstract

Semantic structure in the mental lexicon is often assumed tofollow a taxonomic structure grouping similar items. Thisstudy uses a network clustering analysis of a massive wordassociation dataset that does not primarily focus on concretenoun categories, but includes the majority of the words usedin daily life. At this scale, we found widespread overlapbetween thematically organized clusters, arguing against adiscrete categoric view of the lexicon. An empirical analysisfocusing on taxonomic categories confirmed the widespreadthematic structure even for concrete noun categories in theanimal domain. Overall, this suggests that applying networkclustering to word association data provides valuable insightinto how large-scale semantic information is represented. Thisanalysis leads to a different, more thematic topology than theone inferred from idealized small-scale approaches that sampleonly specific parts of the lexicon

Published
2015

22. Predicting Lexical Norms Using a Word Association Corpus

Author

Vankrunkelsven, Hendrik, Verheyen, Steven, De Deyne, Simon, and Storms, Gert

Subjects
Similarity, MDS, Valence, Arousal, Dominance, Age of acquisition, Concreteness
Abstract

Obtaining norm scores for subjective properties of words canbe quite cumbersome as it requires a considerable investmentproportional to the size of the word set. We present a methodto predict norm scores for large word sets from a wordassociation corpus. We use similarities between word pairs,derived from this corpus, to construct a semantic space.Starting from norm scores for a subset of the words, weretrieve the direction in the space that optimally reflects thenorm data associated with the words. This direction is used toorthogonally project all the other words in the semantic spaceon, providing predictions of the words on the variable ofinterest. In this study, we predict valence, arousal, dominance,age of acquisition, and concreteness and show that thepredictions correlate strongly with the judgments of humanraters. Furthermore, we show that our predictions are superiorto those derived using other methods

Published
2015

24. Typicality and Graded Membership in Dimensional Adjectives

Author

Verheyen, Steven and Égré, Paul

Abstract

This paper concerns an investigation of the manner in which typicality constrains graded membership in antonymous dimensional adjectives such as "short/tall" and "cheap/expensive" using the conceptual spaces framework. In this framework, items are organized in a space comprised of one or more dimensions along which they can be compared. The items' graded membership is established by their relative proximity in this space to the prototypical instances of contrasting concepts. Because dimensional adjectives can be applied to an indefinite variety of things and grammatically have no upper bound to serve as cognitive reference point, they have been argued to lack prototypes. We present the results of an empirical study showing that the conceptual spaces framework can nevertheless be extended successfully to dimensional adjectives by complementing them with a comparison class argument (such as "short/tall" for an adult man and "cheap/expensive" for a smartphone), allowing participants to retrieve meaningful prototypical instances, which can be used to establish membership degree. Since dimensional adjectives are subjective, we investigate how the framework can accommodate interindividual variability in membership degree judgments. We find that the predictions of the framework significantly improve if prototypical instances themselves are assumed to come with a gradient instead of being considered equally typical, thereby providing a more fine-grained account of typicality and furthering the development of the conceptual spaces framework.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

37. Structure and Organization of the Mental Lexicon: A Network Approach Derived from Syntactic Dependency Relations and Word Associations

Author

De Deyne, Simon, Verheyen, Steven, Storms, Gert, Abarbanel, Henry, Series editor, Braha, Dan, Series editor, Érdi, Péter, Series editor, Friston, Karl, Series editor, Haken, Hermann, Series editor, Jirsa, Viktor, Series editor, Kacprzyk, Janusz, Series editor, Kaneko, Kunihiko, Series editor, Kelso, Scott, Series editor, Kirkilionis, Markus, Series editor, Kurths, Jürgen, Series editor, Nowak, Andrzej, Series editor, Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan, Series editor, Reichl, Linda, Series editor, Schuster, Peter, Series editor, Schweitzer, Frank, Series editor, sornette, didier, Series editor, Thurner, Stefan, Series editor, Mehler, Alexander, editor, Lücking, Andy, editor, Banisch, Sven, editor, Blanchard, Philippe, editor, and Job, Barbara, editor

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

39. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lueke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Vel Tromp, Myrthe, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Wolska, Julia, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan, Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, Sadhwani, Shanu, FORRT, Pownall, Madeleine [0000-0002-3734-8006], Azevedo, Flávio [0000-0001-9000-8513], Slack, Hannah R [0000-0003-2522-8717], Flack, Zoe [0000-0001-8123-5589], Elsherif, Mahmoud M [0000-0002-0540-3998], Gilligan-Lee, Katie A [0000-0002-5406-2149], de Oliveira, Catia M F [0000-0002-2976-3330], Gjoneska, Biljana [0000-0003-1200-6672], Terry, Jenny [0000-0002-6843-7116], Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan [0000-0003-3412-4311], Baker, Bradley J [0000-0002-1697-4198], Pittelkow, Merle-Marie [0000-0002-7487-7898], Schmidt, Kathleen [0000-0002-9946-5953], Pennington, Charlotte R [0000-0002-5259-642X], Shaw, John J [0000-0003-3190-6772], Hartmann, Helena [0000-0002-1331-6683], Zaneva, Mirela [0000-0003-3569-931X], Walker, Daniel [0000-0002-9369-6953], Weisberg, Yanna [0000-0002-4219-6625], Izydorczak, Kamil [0000-0002-9870-3825], Arriaga, Patrícia [0000-0001-5766-0489], Bochynska, Agata [0000-0001-6211-8600], Micheli, Leticia [0000-0003-0066-8222], Brekelmans, Gwen [0000-0002-8976-6808], Tyler, Samantha L [0000-0001-9602-5015], Iley, Bethan J [0000-0002-5813-3303], Sladekova, Martina [0000-0001-5059-6576], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Open scholarship, Teaching, Pedagogy, Open Research, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences, Higher Education, MetaArXiv|Medicine and Health Sciences, Open Scholarship, Reproducibility, MetaArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Open Science, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Higher education, Open research, Open science, SDG 4 - Quality Education
Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness, and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (1) students’ scientific literacies (i.e., students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science, and the development of transferable skills); (2) student engagement (i.e., motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration, and engagement in open research), and (3) students’ attitudes towards science (i.e., trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

Published
2023

40. On the optimality of vagueness: “around”, “between” and the Gricean maxims

Author

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Égré, Paul, Spector, Benjamin, Mortier, Adèle, Verheyen, Steven, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Égré, Paul, Spector, Benjamin, Mortier, Adèle, and Verheyen, Steven

Abstract

Why is ordinary language vague? We argue that in contexts in which a cooperative speaker is not perfectly informed about the world, the use of vague expressions can offer an optimal tradeoff between truthfulness (Gricean Quality) and informativeness (Gricean Quantity). Focusing on expressions of approximation such as “around”, which are semantically vague, we show that they allow the speaker to convey indirect probabilistic information, in a way that can give the listener a more accurate representation of the information available to the speaker than any more precise expression would (intervals of the form “between”). That is, vague sentences can be more informative than their precise counterparts. We give a probabilistic treatment of the interpretation of “around”, and offer a model for the interpretation and use of “around”-statements within the Rational Speech Act (RSA) framework. In our account the shape of the speaker’s distribution matters in ways not predicted by the Lexical Uncertainty model standardly used in the RSA framework for vague predicates. We use our approach to draw further lessons concerning the semantic flexibility of vague expressions and their irreducibility to more precise meanings.

Published
2023

41. Similarity-based reasoning in conceptual spaces

Author

Douven, Igor, Verheyen, Steven, Elqayam, Shira, Gärdenfors, Peter, Osta-Vélez, Matías, Douven, Igor, Verheyen, Steven, Elqayam, Shira, Gärdenfors, Peter, and Osta-Vélez, Matías

Abstract

Whereas the validity of deductive inferences can be characterized in terms of their logical form, this is not true for all inferences that appear pre-theoretically valid. Nonetheless, philosophers have argued that at least some of those inferences—sometimes called “similarity-based inferences” —can be given a formal treatment with the help of similarity spaces, which are mathematical spaces purporting to represent human similarity judgments. In these inferences, we conclude that a given property pertains to a category of items on the grounds that the same property pertains to a similar category of items. We look at a specific proposal according to which the strength of such inferences is a function of the distance, as measured in the appropriate similarity space, between the category referenced in the premise and the category referenced in the conclusion. We report the outcomes of three studies that all support the said proposal.

Published
2023

42. On the optimality of vagueness:“around”, “between” and the Gricean maxims

Author

Égré, Paul, Spector, Benjamin, Mortier, Adèle, Verheyen, Steven, Égré, Paul, Spector, Benjamin, Mortier, Adèle, and Verheyen, Steven

Abstract

Why is ordinary language vague? We argue that in contexts in which a cooperative speaker is not perfectly informed about the world, the use of vague expressions can offer an optimal tradeoff between truthfulness (Gricean Quality) and informativeness (Gricean Quantity). Focusing on expressions of approximation such as “around”, which are semantically vague, we show that they allow the speaker to convey indirect probabilistic information, in a way that can give the listener a more accurate representation of the information available to the speaker than any more precise expression would (intervals of the form “between”). That is, vague sentences can be more informative than their precise counterparts. We give a probabilistic treatment of the interpretation of “around”, and offer a model for the interpretation and use of “around”-statements within the Rational Speech Act (RSA) framework. In our account the shape of the speaker’s distribution matters in ways not predicted by the Lexical Uncertainty model standardly used in the RSA framework for vague predicates. We use our approach to draw further lessons concerning the semantic flexibility of vague expressions and their irreducibility to more precise meanings.

Published
2023

46. The face-name matching effect in a learning context: Are the names of people who look like their name easier to learn?

Author

Meers, Sander and Verheyen, Steven

Subjects
FOS: Psychology, Cognition and Perception, Social Psychology, Face perception, Cognitive Psychology, Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Learning experiment, Face-name goodness-of-fit
Abstract

This study investigates the face-name matching effect proposed by Zwebner et al., (2017) with a name learning paradigm in which participants have to learn 14 face-name pairs. In half of the trials, the name to be learned will be the depicted person’s actual name (matches) and in the other half of the trials, the faces will be paired with a name that is not that of the depicted person (mismatches). Additionaly, the matches have a high goodness-of-fit of the face and name, whereas the mismatches have a low goodness-of-fit. Evidence for the face-name matching effect would be provided if the matches are learned faster than the mismatches.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Examples of best practice in embedding open and reproducible scholarship from Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, and Sadhwani, Shanu

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results