Search

Objective: Early mobilisation in critically ill children is safe and feasible. However, the effectiveness of early mobilisation on short- and long-term outcomes is understudied. The aim of this scoping review was to generate an overview of outcomes used in previous research regarding early mobilisation in critically ill children., Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and CINAHL, without restricting on design, on April 3rd, 2023., Study Selection: Two independent reviewers assessed titles, abstracts, and full texts. Studies were included if they described any outcomes related to early mobilisation in critically ill children., Data Charting Process: One reviewer performed data extraction, which was subsequently verified by another reviewer. Seven domains were used to categorise the outcomes: mortality, physiological, life impact, resource use, adverse events, process indicators, and perception of early mobilisation., Data Synthesis: Out of 3380 screened titles, 25 studies were included. Data extraction yielded 148 unique outcomes, which were clustered into 40 outcomes. Outcomes spanned in all seven domains, with "length of paediatric intensive care unit stay" (resource use) and "adverse events involving unintentional removal of catheters, tubes, and/or lines" (adverse events) being the most frequently reported. Process indicators such as mobilisation activities were well documented. Mortality and functionality outcomes were chosen the least., Conclusions: This scoping review provides a categorised overview of outcomes that have been used to assess the effectiveness of early mobilisation in critically ill children. The findings show a great heterogeneity in used outcomes and are input for paediatric intensive care unit experts and parents to prioritise outcomes developing a Core Outcome Set., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors have none to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Study Objectives: Despite frequent sleep disruption in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), bedside sleep monitoring in real-time is currently not available. Supervised machine learning (ML) applied to electrocardiography (ECG) data may provide a solution, since cardiovascular dynamics are directly modulated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS) during sleep., Methods: Retrospective study using hospital-based polysomnography (PSG) recordings obtained in non-critically ill children between 2017 and 2021. Six age categories were defined: 6-12 months, 1-3 years, 3-5 years, 5-9 years, 9-13 years and 13-18 years. Features were derived in time, frequency and non-linear domain from pre-processed ECG data. Sleep classification models were developed for two, three, four and five state using logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB) classifiers during five-fold nested cross-validation. Models were additionally validated across age categories., Results: A total of 90 non-critically ill children were included with a median (Q1, Q3) recording length of 549.0 (494.8, 601.3) minutes. The three models obtained AUROC 0.72 - 0.78 with minimal variation across classifiers and age categories. Balanced accuracies were 0.70 - 0.72, 0.59 - 0.61, 0.50 - 0.51 and 0.41 - 0.42 for two, three, four and five state. Generally, the XGB model obtained the highest balanced accuracy (p < 0.05), except for five state where LR excelled (p = 0.67)., Conclusions: ECG-based ML models are a promising and non-invasive method for automated sleep classification directly at the bedside of non-critically ill children aged 6 months to 18 years. Models obtained moderate-to-good performance for two and three state classification., (© 2024 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)

Study Objectives: Although sleep is frequently disrupted in the pediatric intensive care unit, it is currently not possible to perform real-time sleep monitoring at the bedside. In this study, spectral band powers of electroencephalography data are used to derive a simple index for sleep classification., Methods: Retrospective study at Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, using hospital-based polysomnography recordings obtained in non-critically ill children between 2017 and 2021. Six age categories were defined: 6-12 months, 1-3 years, 3-5 years, 5-9 years, 9-13 years, and 13-18 years. Candidate index measures were derived by calculating spectral band powers in different frequent frequency bands of smoothed electroencephalography. With the best performing index, sleep classification models were developed for two, three, and four states via decision tree and five-fold nested cross-validation. Model performance was assessed across age categories and electroencephalography channels., Results: In total 90 patients with polysomnography were included, with a mean (standard deviation) recording length of 10.3 (1.1) hours. The best performance was obtained with the gamma to delta spectral power ratio of the F4-A1 and F3-A1 channels with smoothing. Balanced accuracy was 0.88, 0.74, and 0.57 for two-, three-, and four-state classification. Across age categories, balanced accuracy ranged between 0.83 and 0.92 and 0.72 and 0.77 for two- and three-state classification, respectively., Conclusions: We propose an interpretable and generalizable sleep index derived from single-channel electroencephalography for automated sleep monitoring at the bedside in non-critically ill children ages 6 months to 18 years, with good performance for two- and three-state classification., Citation: van Twist E, Hiemstra FW, Cramer ABG, et al. An electroencephalography-based sleep index and supervised machine learning as a suitable tool for automated sleep classification in children. J Clin Sleep Med . 2024;20(3):389-397., (© 2024 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)

Intravenous maintenance fluid therapy (IV-MFT) is one of the most prescribed, yet one of the least studied, interventions in paediatric acute and critical care settings. IV-MFT is not typically treated in the same way as drugs with specific indications, contraindications, compositions, and associated adverse effects. In the last decade, societies in both paediatric and adult medicine have issued evidence-based practice guidelines for the use of intravenous fluids in clinical practice. The main objective of this Viewpoint is to summarise and compare the rationales on which these international expert guidelines were based and how these recommendations affect IV-MFT practices in paediatric acute and critical care. Although these guidelines recommend the use of isotonic fluids as a standard in IV-MFT, some discrepancies and uncertainties remain regarding the systematic use of balanced fluids, glucose and electrolyte requirements, and appropriate fluid volume. IV-MFT should be considered in the same way as any other prescription drug and none of the components of IV-MFT prescription should be overlooked (ie, choice of drug, dosing rate, duration of treatment, and de-escalation). Furthermore, most evidence that was used to inform the guidelines comes from high-income countries. Although some principles of IV-MFT are universal, the direct relevance to and feasibility of implementing the guidelines in low-income and middle-income countries is uncertain., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DWB and IG received honoraria for presentations from B. Braun. SCATV received honoraria for presentations from Nutricia. LVM received honoraria for presentations from Nutricia, Danone, Abbott Laboratories, and Nestle. LNT received honoraria for presentations from Nestle. FVV received honoraria for presentations from Baxter, Nutricia, and Nestle Health Care. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Neonates and infants surviving critical illness show impaired growth during critical illness and are at risk for later neuropsychological impairments. Early identification of individuals most at risk is needed to provide tailored long-term follow-up and care. The research question is whether early growth during hospitalization is associated with growth and neuropsychological outcomes in neonates and infants after pediatric intensive care unit admission (PICU). This is a secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC trial. Weight measurements upon PICU admission, at PICU discharge, at hospital discharge, at 2- and 4-year follow-up, and of different subgroups were compared using (paired) t-tests. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between early growth in weight measures and neuropsychological outcomes at 4-year follow-up. One hundred twenty-one infants were included, and median age upon admission was 21 days. Growth in weight per week was less than the age-appropriate norm, resulting in a decrease in weight-for-age Z-score during hospitalization. Weight is normalized at 2- and 4-year follow-up. Weight gain in kilograms per week and change in weight Z-score were not associated with neurodevelopmental outcome measures at 4-year follow-up. Lower weight-for-age Z-score at PICU admission and at hospital discharge was associated only with lower weight and height Z-scores at 4-year follow-up., Conclusion: Growth in weight during hospital stay of young survivors of critical illness is impaired. Worse early growth in weight is associated with lower weight and height but not with neuropsychological outcomes at 4-year follow-up., What Is Known: • Critically ill neonates and infants show impaired early growth during admission and are at risk for later neuropsychological impairments. • Unraveling the association between early growth and later neuropsychological impairments is crucial since the first year of life is critical for brain development., What Is New: • Critically ill neonates and infants had age appropriate weight measures at 4-year follow-up. • Poor growth in weight during hospital stay was not associated with poorer cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning four years after critical illness., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: Critically ill children are at risk of micronutrient deficiencies, which might lead to poor clinical outcomes. However, the interpretation of micronutrient concentrations in plasma is complicated due to age-dependent and critical illness-dependent changes. Certain red blood cell (RBC) concentrations might reflect the overall body status more reliably than plasma levels in the presence of systemic inflammatory response. This study longitudinally examined micronutrient concentrations in both plasma and RBC in critically ill children., Methods: This secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC RCT investigated the impact of early versus late initiation of parenteral macronutrient supplementation in critically ill children. All children received micronutrients when EN was insufficient (<80 % energy requirements). Blood samples were obtained on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to measure zinc, selenium, and copper in plasma and selenium, copper, and magnesium in RBCs. Plasma magnesium was measured with colorimetric detection. Micronutrient concentrations were compared with age-specific reference values in healthy children and expressed using Z-scores. Changes in micronutrient concentrations over time were examined using the Friedman and post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests., Results: For 67 critically ill children, median (Q1; Q3) age 9.5 (5.5; 13.2) years, PIM3 score -2.3 (-3.1; -0.8), samples were available at various time points during their PICU stay. For 22 patients, longitudinal samples were available. On day 1, the median plasma Z-score for zinc was -5.2 (-5.2; -2.9), copper -1.6 (-2.9; -0.2), selenium -2.6 (-3.8; -1.0), magnesium -0.2 (-1.6; 1.3), and median RBC Z-score for copper was 0.5 (-0.1; 1.3), selenium -0.3 (-1.1; 0.7), magnesium 0.2 (-0.4; 1.3). In the longitudinal analysis, plasma zinc was significantly higher on day 5 (Z-score -3.2 (-4.6; -1.4)) than on day 1 (Z-score -5.2 (-5.2; -3.0), p = 0.032), and plasma magnesium was significantly higher on day 3 (Z-score 1.1 (-0.7; 4.0)) than on day 1 (Z-score -0.3 (-1.6; 0.5), p = 0.018). Plasma copper and selenium remained stable, and the RBC concentrations of all micronutrients remained stable during the first five days., Conclusions: Most patients had low plasma zinc, copper and selenium concentrations in the first week of their PICU stay, whereas they had normal to high RBC concentrations. More research is needed to examine the relationships between micronutrients and clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Predicting the patients' tolerance to enteral nutrition (EN) would help clinicians optimize individual nutritional intake. This study investigated the course of several gastrointestinal (GI) biomarkers and their association with EN advancement (ENA) longitudinally during pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit randomized controlled trial. EN was started early and increased gradually. The cholecystokinin (CCK), leptin, glucagon, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2 (I-FABP2), and citrulline plasma concentrations were measured upon PICU admission, day 3 and day 5. ENA was defined as kcal EN provided as % of predicted resting energy expenditure. The course of the biomarkers and ENA was examined in patients with samples on all time points using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The association of ENA with the biomarkers was examined using a 2-part mixed-effects model with data of the complete population, adjusted for possible confounders., Results: For 172 patients, median age 8.6 years (first quartile; third quartile: 4.2; 13.4), samples were available, of which 55 had samples on all time points. The median ENA was 0 (0; 0) on admission, 14.5 (0.0; 43.8) on day 3, and 28.0 (7.6; 94.8) on day 5. During PICU stay, CCK and I-FABP2 concentrations decreased significantly, whereas glucagon concentrations increased significantly, and leptin and citrulline remained stable. None of the biomarkers was longitudinally associated with ENA., Conclusions: Based on the current evidence, CCK, leptin, glucagon, I-FABP2, and citrulline appear to have no added value in predicting ENA in the first 5 days of pediatric critical illness., Competing Interests: Dr Hulst has received speaker fees from Abbott Nutrition and Nutricia Canada. Drs Vanhorebeek and Van den Berghe were granted funding by the Methusalem programme of the Flemish Government (METH14/06). Dr Gunst holds a postdoctoral research fellowship granted by the Clinical Research and Education Council of the University Hospitals Leuven, and Dr Casaer by the Research-Foundation Flanders Belgium (Fundamental Clinical Research Fellowship 1700111N). Dr Van den Berghe was supported by ERC Advanced Grants from the Ideas Program of the European Union 7th framework program (AdvG-2012-321670 and AdvG-2017-785809), and by the Agency for Innovation through Science and Technology, Flanders, Belgium (IWT/110685/TBM). Dr Verbruggen holds an unrestricted research agreement funded by Danone Nutricia Research, The Netherlands, and has received grants from the Sophia Research Foundation (S19-33), the Stichting Agis Zorginnovatie, and the Erasmus Trustfonds. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Background & Aims: Critically ill children are fed day and night, assuming this improves enteral tolerance and the probability of achieving nutritional goals. It was previously shown that a fasting response, reflected by increased ketosis, at least partly explained the beneficial outcome of delayed initiation of supplemental parenteral nutrition. This study aims to investigate whether an overnight fast increases ketosis and is feasible and safe in critically ill children., Methods: The Continuousversus Intermittent Nutrition in Paediatric Intensive Care (ContInNuPIC) study is a randomised controlled trial in a tertiary referral Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in the Netherlands. Critically ill children (term newborn-18 years) with an expected PICU stay ≥48 h, dependent on artificial nutrition, were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified for age group) to intermittent feeding, with interruption of feedings during an age-dependent overnight period of eight to 12 h, or to continuous feeding, with the administration of feedings day and night. In both groups, similar daily caloric targets were pursued. For children younger than one year, mandatory minor glucose infusions were provided during fasting. The primary outcome was the feasibility, defined as two conditions (1): a significant difference in the patients' highest daily ketone (3-β-hydroxybutyrate, BHB) levels during each overnight period, and (2): non-inferiority regarding daily caloric intake, examined using a two-part mixed-effects model with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 33%, in an intention-to-treat analysis. The study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7877)., Results: Between May 19, 2020, and July 13, 2022, 140 critically ill children, median (first quartile; third quartile) age 0.3 (0.1; 2.7) years, were randomised to intermittent (n = 67) or continuous feeding (n = 73). In the intermittent feeding group, BHB levels were significantly higher (median 0.4 (0.2; 1.0) vs. 0.3 (0.1; 0.7) mmol/L, p < 0.001). The ratio of total caloric intake in the intermittent feeding group to the intake in the continuous feeding group was not consistently significantly more than 0.67, thus not proving non-inferiority. No severe, resistant hypoglycaemic events, nor severe gastrointestinal complications related to the intervention occurred, and feeding intolerance did not occur more often in the intermittent than in the continuous feeding group., Conclusion: Compared with day and night feeding, intermittent feeding with an overnight fast and mandatory glucose infusion for children younger than one year marginally increased ketosis and did not lead to more hypoglycaemic incidents in critically ill children. Because non-inferiority regarding daily caloric intake was not proven, the feasibility of an overnight fast could not be shown in the current study. However, as feeding intolerance did not increase during the condensed feeding periods, the nutritional intake was probably limited by the prescription of nutrition and interruptions. More research is needed to determine the optimal level and duration of clinically relevant ketosis and the best method to achieve this., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest SCATV holds an unrestricted research agreement funded by Danone Nutricia Research, The Netherlands. The other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Early mobilisation of critically ill adults has been proven effective and is safe and feasible for critically ill children. However, barriers and perceived benefits of paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff involvement in mobilising critically ill children are largely unknown., Aim: To explore the barriers and perceived benefits regarding early mobilisation of critically ill children as perceived by PICU staff., Study Design: A cross-sectional survey study among staff from seven PICUs in the Netherlands has been carried out., Results: Two hundred and fifteen of the 641 health care professionals (33.5%) who were invited to complete a questionnaire responded, of whom 159 (75%) were nurses, 40 (19%) physicians, and 14 (6%) physical therapists. Respondents considered early mobilisation potentially beneficial to shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (86%), improve wake/sleep rhythm (86%) and shorten the length of stay in the PICU (85%). However, staff were reluctant to mobilise patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (63%), and patients with traumatic brain injury (49%). Perceived barriers to early mobilisation were hemodynamic instability (78%), risk of dislocation of lines/tubes (74%), and level of sedation (62%). In total, 40.3% of PICU nurses stated that physical therapists provided enough support in their PICU, but 84.6% of the physical therapists believed support was sufficient., Conclusion: Participating PICU staff considered early mobilisation as potentially beneficial in improving patient outcomes, although barriers were noted in certain patient groups., Relevance to Clinical Practice: We identified barriers to early mobilisation which should be addressed in implementation research projects in order to make early mobilisation in critically ill children work., (© 2022 The Authors. Nursing in Critical Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Critical Care Nurses.)

Purpose: Intravenous maintenance fluid therapy (IV-MFT) prescribing in acute and critically ill children is very variable among pediatric health care professionals. In order to provide up to date IV-MFT guidelines, the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) undertook a systematic review to answer the following five main questions about IV-MFT: (i) the indications for use (ii) the role of isotonic fluid (iii) the role of balanced solutions (iv) IV fluid composition (calcium, magnesium, potassium, glucose and micronutrients) and v) and the optimal amount of fluid., Methods: A multidisciplinary expert group within ESPNIC conducted this systematic review using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading method. Five databases were searched for studies that answered these questions, in acute and critically children (from 37 weeks gestational age to 18 years), published until November 2020. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed, and meta-analyses were undertaken when appropriate. A series of recommendations was derived and voted on by the expert group to achieve consensus through two voting rounds., Results: 56 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 16 recommendations were produced. Outcome reporting was inconsistent among studies. Recommendations generated were based on a heterogeneous level of evidence, but consensus within the expert group was high. "Strong consensus" was reached for 11/16 (69%) and "consensus" for 5/16 (31%) of the recommendations., Conclusions: Key recommendations are to use isotonic balanced solutions providing glucose to restrict IV-MFT infusion volumes in most hospitalized children and to regularly monitor plasma electrolyte levels, serum glucose and fluid balance., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: Hypophosphatemia during critical illness has been associated with adverse outcome. The reintroduction of enteral or parenteral nutrition, leading to refeeding hypophosphatemia (RFH), has been presented as potential risk factor. We investigated the occurrence of early RFH, its association with clinical outcome, and the impact of early parenteral nutrition (PN) on the development of early RFH in pediatric critical illness., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC randomized controlled trial (N = 1440), which showed that withholding supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) for 1 week (late-PN) in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) accelerated recovery and reduced new infections compared to early-PN (<24 h). Patients with renal replacement therapy or unavailable phosphate concentrations were excluded from this analysis. Early RFH was defined as serum/plasma phosphate <0.65 mmol/L and a drop of >0.16 mmol/L within 3 days of admission to the PICU. The association between baseline characteristics and early RFH, and the association of early RFH with clinical outcome were investigated using logistic and linear regression models, both uncorrected and corrected for possible confounders. To examine the impact of nutritional intake on phosphate concentrations, structural nested mean models with propensity score and censoring models were used., Results: A total of 1247 patients were eligible (618 early-PN, 629 late-PN). Early RFH occurred in 40 patients (3%) in total, significantly more in the early-PN group (n = 31, within-group occurrence 5%) than in the late-PN-group (n = 9, within-group occurrence 1%, p < 0.001). Patients who were older (OR 1.14 (95% CI 1.08; 1.21) per year added, p < 0.001) and who had a higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PIM3) score had a higher risk of developing early RFH (OR 1.36 (95% CI 1.15; 1.59) per unit added, p < 0.001), whereas patients in the late-PN group had a lower risk of early RFH (OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.10; 0.49), p < 0.001). Early RFH was significantly associated with a 56% longer PICU stay (p = 0.003) and 42% longer hospital stay (p = 0.007), but not with new infections (OR 2.01 (95% CI 0.90; 4.30), p = 0.08) or length of mechanical ventilatory support (OR 1.05 (95% CI -3.92; 6.03), p = 0.68), when adjusted for possible confounders. Increase of parenteral nutrition intake (in % kcal of predicted resting energy expenditure) decreased phosphate concentrations (c = -0.002 (95% CI -0.002; -0.001)., Conclusions: Early RFH occurred in 3% of critically ill children. Patients randomized to late-PN had a lower chance of developing early RFH, which may be explained by the more gradual build-up of nutrition. As early RFH might impact recovery, it is important to closely monitor phosphate concentrations in patients, especially of those at risk for early RFH., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intermittent fasting is a time-restricted feeding strategy with proven health benefits, which is based on multiple metabolic and endocrine changes, in several patient populations and healthy participants. In the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), artificial feeding is usually administered 24 hours a day, although solid evidence supporting this practice is lacking. This discards the potential benefits of fasting in this population. We hypothesize that intermittent nutrition with a focus on an overnight feeding interruption (intermittent fasting), as compared with 24-hour continuous nutrition, is a feasible and safe strategy, with potential benefits, for critically ill children., Objective: The aim of the Continuous versus Intermittent Nutrition in Pediatric Intensive Care randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to investigate a strategy of intermittent nutrition with a focus on an overnight feeding interruption period versus 24-hour nutrition during the first 14 days in the PICU., Methods: The Continuous versus Intermittent Nutrition in Pediatric Intensive Care study is an investigator-initiated RCT in a tertiary referral PICU. Critically ill children (term newborn to 18 years), expected to stay in the PICU for ≥48 hours, and dependent on artificial nutrition, are eligible for inclusion. This study will randomize critically ill children (n=140) to a continuous versus intermittent nutrition strategy. In both groups, similar daily caloric targets will be prescribed. In the continuous group (control), nutrition will be administered 24 hours a day, with a maximum interruption period of 2 hours. In the intermittent group (intervention), nutrition will be interrupted during an age-dependent overnight fasting period. The study intervention will last until admission day 14, initiation of oral intake, or discharge from the PICU, whichever comes first. The primary outcome is the difference in ketosis between the groups under the condition of noninferiority regarding caloric intake. Secondary outcomes are feeding intolerance; the proportion of severe and resistant hypoglycemic events and severe gastrointestinal complications; and additional observed effects on nutritional intake, circadian rhythm, and clinically relevant outcome measures of the intermittent feeding strategy compared with continuous nutrition., Results: The study was approved by the Dutch national ethical review board in February 2020. The first patient was enrolled on May 19, 2020. By May 2022, a total of 132 patients had been included in the study. Recruitment of the last patient is expected in Q3 2022., Conclusions: Although intermittent fasting has been proven to have many health benefits in both animal and human studies, the feasibility and safety of this strategy in a PICU setting must be investigated. This RCT will help physicians gain more insight into the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical effects of intermittent feeding with overnight fasting in critically ill children., Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register NL7877; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL7877., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/36229., (©Karlien Veldscholte, Arnout B G Cramer, Rogier C J de Jonge, Renate D Eveleens, Koenraad F M Joosten, Sascha C A T Verbruggen. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.06.2022.)

Although evidence for the superiority of continuous feeding over intermittent feeding is lacking, in most paediatric intensive care units (PICU) artificial feeding is administered continuously for 24 h per day. Until now, studies in PICU on intermittent feeding have primarily focused on surrogate endpoints such as nutritional intake and gastro-intestinal complaints and none have studied the effects of an extended fasting period. Intermittent fasting has been proven to have many health benefits in both animal and human studies. The observed beneficial effects are based on multiple metabolic and endocrine changes that are presumed crucial in critical illness as well. One key element is the transition to ketone body metabolism, which, among others, contributes to the stimulation of several cellular pathways involved in stress resistance (neuro)plasticity and mitochondrial biogenesis, and might help preserve brain function. Secondly, the fasting state stimulates the activation of autophagy, a process that is crucial for cellular function and integrity. Of the different intermittent fasting strategies investigated, time-restricted feeding with a daily extended fasting period appears most feasible in the PICU. Moreover, planning the fasting period overnight could help maintain the circadian rhythm. Although not investigated, such an overnight intermittent fasting strategy might improve the metabolic profile, feeding tolerance and perhaps even have beneficial effects on tissue repair, reperfusion injury, muscle weakness, and the immune response. Future studies should investigate practical implications in critically ill children and the optimal duration of the fasting periods, which might be affected by the severity of illness and by age., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Following the results of the paediatric early versus late parenteral nutrition in critical illness (PEPaNIC) multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, the new ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN and ESPNIC guidelines recommend to consider withholding parenteral macronutrients for 1 week, while providing micronutrients, in critically ill children if enteral nutrition is insufficient. Critically ill children are suspected to be vulnerable to micronutrient deficiencies due to inadequate enteral nutrition, increased body's demands and excessive losses. Hitherto, micronutrient requirements in PICU are estimated based on recommended daily intakes for healthy children and expert opinion. We aimed to provide an overview of the current practice of micronutrient administration and practical considerations in the three participating centres of the PEPaNIC study, and compare these therapies with the recommendations in the new ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines., Methods: We describe the current composition and preparation of the prescribed parenteral micronutrients (consisting of vitamins, trace elements and electrolytes) in the three centres (Leuven, Rotterdam and Edmonton) that participated in the PEPaNIC RCT, and compare this per micronutrient with the ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines recommendations., Results: The three centres use a different micronutrient supplementation protocol during the first week of critical illness in children, with substantial differences regarding the amounts administered. Leuven administers commercial vitamins, trace elements and electrolytes in separate infusions both in 4 h. Rotterdam provides commercial vitamins and trace elements simultaneously via 8-h infusion and electrolytes continuously over 24 h. Lastly, Edmonton administers commercial vitamins and institutionally prepared trace elements solutions in 1 h and electrolytes on demand. Comparison with the ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines yields in differences between the recommendations and the administered amounts, which are most substantial for vitamins., Conclusion: The practice of intravenous micronutrient administration differs substantially between the three PEPaNIC centres and in comparison with the current guideline recommendations. This deviation is at least partially explained by the inability to provide all recommended amounts with the currently available commercial products and by the lack of strong evidence supporting these recommendations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: In the absence of methodologically sound randomized controlled trials (RCTs), current recommendations for timing and amount of enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill children are based on observational studies. These studies have associated achievement of a higher EN intake in critically ill children with improved outcome. Inherent to the observational design of these underlying studies, thorough insight in possible confounding factors to correct for is essential. We evaluated the associations between EN intake and 1) patient and daily clinical characteristics and 2) clinical outcomes adjusted for these patient and clinical characteristics during the first week of critical illness with a multivariable mixed model., Methods: This secondary analysis of the multicentre PEPaNIC RCT investigated a subgroup of critically ill children with daily prospectively recorded gastrointestinal symptoms and EN intake during the first week with multivariable analyses using two-part mixed effect models, including multiple testing corrections using Holm's method. These models combined a mixed-effects logistic regression for the dichotomous outcome EN versus no EN, and a linear mixed-effects model for the patients who received any EN intake. EN intake per patient was expressed as mean daily EN as % of predicted resting energy expenditure (% of EN/REE). Model 1 included 40 fixed effect baseline patient characteristics, and daily parameters of illness severity, feeding, medication and gastrointestinal symptoms. Model 2 included these patient and daily variables as well as clinical outcomes., Results: Complete data were available for 690 children. EN was provided in 503 (73%) patients with a start after a median of 2 (IQR 2-3) days and a median % of EN/REE of 38.8 (IQR 14.1-79.5) over the first week. Multivariable mixed model analyses including all patients showed that admission after gastrointestinal surgery (-49%EN/REE; p = 0.002), gastric feeding (-31% EN/REE; p < 0.001), treatment with inotropic agents (-22%EN/REE; p = 0.026) and large gastric residual volume (-64%EN/REE; p < 0.001) were independently associated with a low mean EN intake. In univariable analysis, low mean EN intake was associated with new acquired infections, hypoglycaemia, duration of PICU and hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. However, after adjustment for confounders, these associations were no longer present, except for low EN and hypoglycaemia (-39%EN/REE; p = 0.018)., Conclusions: Several patient and clinical characteristics during the first week of critical illness were associated with EN intake. No independent associations were found between EN intake and clinical outcomes such as mortality, new acquired infection and duration of stay. These data emphasize the necessity of adequate multivariable adjustment in nutritional support research and the need for future RCTs investigating optimal EN intake., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To explore enteral feeding practices and the achievement of energy targets in children on noninvasive respiratory support, in four European PICUs., Design: A four-center retrospective cohort study., Setting: Four PICUs: Bristol, United Kingdom; Lyon, France; Madrid, Spain; and Rotterdam, The Netherlands., Patients: Children in PICU who required acute noninvasive respiratory support in the first 7 days. The primary outcome was achievement of standardized kcal/goal., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 325 children were included (Bristol 104; Lyon 99; Madrid 72; and Rotterdam 50). The median (interquartile range) age and weight were 3 months (1-16 mo) and 5 kg (4-10 mo), respectively, with 66% admitted with respiratory failure. There were large between-center variations in practices. Overall, 190/325 (58.5%) received noninvasive respiratory support in order to prevent intubation and 41.5% after extubation. The main modes of noninvasive respiratory support used were high-flow nasal cannula 43.6%, bilevel positive airway pressure 33.2%, and continuous positive airway pressure 21.2%. Most children (77.8%) were fed gastrically (48.4% continuously) and the median time to the first feed after noninvasive respiratory support initiation was 4 hours (interquartile range, 1-9 hr). The median percentage of time a child was nil per oral while on noninvasive respiratory support was 4 hours (2-13 hr). Overall, children received a median of 56% (25-82%) of their energy goals compared with a standardized target of 0.85 of the recommended dietary allowance. Patients receiving step-up noninvasive respiratory support (p = < 0.001), those on bilevel positive airway pressure or continuous positive airway pressure (compared with high-flow nasal cannula) (p = < 0.001), and those on continuous feeds (p = < 0.001) achieved significantly more of their kcal goal. Gastrointestinal complications varied from 4.8-20%, with the most common reported being vomiting in 54/325 (16.6%), other complications occurred in 40/325 (12.3%) children, but pulmonary aspiration was rare 5/325 (1.5%)., Conclusions: Children on noninvasive respiratory support tolerated feeding well, with relatively few complications, but prospective trials are now required to determine the optimal timing and feeding method for these children., Competing Interests: Dr. Verbruggen’s institution received funding from Nutricia BV and he received funding from Sophia Research Foundation and a European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition research grant. Dr. Valla received funding from Baxter and Nutricia. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

There are reports of children COVID-19 or COVID-19 like symptoms with hyperinflammatory multisystem syndrome, ARDS, gastrointestinal and atypical Kawasaki disease presenting to PICU worldwide temporally associated with COVID-19, for which there are important nutrition support considerations. As a result, the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care - Metabolism, Endocrine and Nutrition group (ESPNIC-MEN) and paediatric nutritionists working in PICUs are being consulted regarding nutrition management of critically ill children with COVID-19 or COVID-19 like symptoms. Therefore, the aim of this short report is to provide a summary of nutrition support recommendations for critically ill children with COVID-19. They are based on the ESPNIC-MEN section recommendations published in January 2020 and surviving sepsis recommendations from February 2020., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None to declare., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: No evidence based recommendations for micronutrient requirements during paediatric critical illness are available, other than those arising from recommended nutrient intakes (RNI) for healthy children and expert opinion., Objectives: The objective of this review is to examine the available evidence from micronutrient status in critically ill children considering studies which describe 1) micronutrient levels, 2) associations between micronutrient levels and clinical outcome, and 3) impact on clinical outcome with micronutrient supplementation during PICU admission., Design: Scoping review., Eligibility Criteria: Any study which used a qualitative and quantitative design considering causes and consequences of micronutrient levels or micronutrient supplementation during paediatric critical illness., Sources of Evidence: NICE Healthcare Databases Advanced Search website (https://hdas.nice.org.uk/) was used as a tool for multiple searches, with a content analysis and charting of data extracted., Results: 711 records were identified, 35 were included in the review. Studies evaluated serum micronutrient status was determined on admission day in majority of patients. A content analysis identified (n = 49) initial codes, (n = 14) sub-categories and (n = 5) overarching themes during critical illness, which were identified as: i) low levels of micronutrients, ii) causes of aberrant micronutrient levels, iii) associations between micronutrients levels and outcome, iv) supplementation of micronutrients., Conclusion: During critical illness, micronutrients should be provided in sufficient amounts to meet reference nutrient intakes for age. Although, there is insufficient data to recommend routine supplementations of micronutrients at higher doses during critical illness, the 'absence of evidence should not imply evidence of absence', and well designed prospective studies are urgently needed to elucidate paediatric micronutrient requirements during critical illness. The absence of reliable biomarkers make it challenging to determine whether low serum levels are reflective of a true deficiency or as a result redistribution, particularly during the acute phase of critical illness. As more children continue to survive a PICU admission, particularly those with complex diseases micronutrient supplementation research should also be inclusive of the recovery phase following critical illness., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To explore the perceived barriers by pediatric intensive care healthcare professionals (nurses, dieticians, and physicians) in delivering enteral nutrition to critically ill children across the world., Design: Cross-sectional international online survey adapted for use in pediatric settings., Setting: PICUs across the world., Subjects: PICU nurses, physicians, and dietitians., Interventions: The 20-item adult intensive care "Barriers to delivery of enteral nutrition" survey was modified for pediatric settings, tested, and translated into 10 languages. The survey was distributed online to pediatric intensive care nurses, physicians, and dieticians via professional networks in March 2019 to June 2019. Professionals were asked to rate each item indicating the degree to which they perceived it hinders the provision of enteral nutrition in their PICUs with a 7-point Likert scale from 0 "not at all a barrier" to 6 "an extreme amount.", Measurement and Main Results: Nine-hundred twenty pediatric intensive care professionals responded from 57 countries; 477 of 920 nurses (52%), 407 of 920 physicians (44%), and 36 of 920 dieticians (4%). Sixty-two percent had more than 5 years PICU experience and 49% worked in general PICUs, with 35% working in combined cardiac and general PICUs. The top three perceived barriers across all professional groups were as follows: 1) enteral feeds being withheld in advance of procedures or operating department visits, 2) none or not enough dietitian coverage on weekends or evenings, and 3) not enough time dedicated to education and training on how to optimally feed patients., Conclusions: This is the largest survey that has explored perceived barriers to the delivery of enteral nutrition across the world by physicians, nurses, and dietitians. There were some similarities with adult intensive care barriers. In all professional groups, the perception of barriers reduced with years PICU experience. This survey highlights implications for PICU practice around more focused nutrition education for all PICU professional groups.

Background: Nutritional support is considered essential for the outcome of paediatric critical illness. There is a lack of methodologically sound trials to provide evidence-based guidelines leading to diverse practices in PICUs worldwide. Acknowledging these limitations, we aimed to summarize the available literature and provide practical guidance for the paediatric critical care clinicians around important clinical questions many of which are not covered by previous guidelines., Objective: To provide an ESPNIC position statement and make clinical recommendations for the assessment and nutritional support in critically ill infants and children., Design: The metabolism, endocrine and nutrition (MEN) section of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) generated 15 clinical questions regarding different aspects of nutrition in critically ill children. After a systematic literature search, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system was applied to assess the quality of the evidence, conducting meta-analyses where possible, to generate statements and clinical recommendations, which were then voted on electronically. Strong consensus (> 95% agreement) and consensus (> 75% agreement) on these statements and recommendations was measured through modified Delphi voting rounds., Results: The final 15 clinical questions generated a total of 7261 abstracts, of which 142 publications were identified relevant to develop 32 recommendations. A strong consensus was reached in 21 (66%) and consensus was reached in 11 (34%) of the recommendations. Only 11 meta-analyses could be performed on 5 questions., Conclusions: We present a position statement and clinical practice recommendations. The general level of evidence of the available literature was low. We have summarised this and provided a practical guidance for the paediatric critical care clinicians around important clinical questions.

Background & Aims: Clinicians and researchers often use feeding intolerance (FI) as main cause for insufficient enteral nutrition (EN). However, there is no uniform definition for FI. A uniform definition is essential for future studies focusing on predictors and outcomes of FI and enteral nutrition. A systematic review was performed to investigate the definitions, prevalence, predictors and outcomes of FI in critically ill children., Methods: The databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criteria were interventional, observational or case-control studies (>10 patients) in which a definition of FI was reported in critically ill children (0-21 years)., Results: FI was defined in 31 unique studies performed in 2973 critically ill children. FI was most commonly defined as presence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and/or large gastric residual volume (GRV) (n = 21), followed by discontinuation of EN due to GI symptoms (n = 7) and inadequate delivery of EN (n = 3). Median prevalence of FI was 20.0% [IQR 7.4%-33.0%]. Large GRV, abdominal distention, diarrhoea and vomiting/emesis, were the predominantly reported GI symptoms to define FI. FI was associated with severity of illness, mortality and nosocomial infections., Conclusions: Feeding intolerance is inconsistently defined in the current literature, but appears to be a prevalent concern in critically ill children. FI is most frequently defined by the presence of GI symptoms. A standardized definition is needed for both clinical and research purpose to determine the consequences of FI in relation to short-term and long-term outcomes. The new proposed definition for FI entails the inability to achieve enteral nutrition target intakes in combination with the presence of GI symptoms indicating GI dysfunction., Protocol Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018092967. Registered on 07 June 2018., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Critically ill children are at increased risk of weight deterioration in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Whether early initiation of parenteral nutrition (PN) prevents weight deterioration is unknown. The aims of this study were to assess the effect of withholding supplemental PN during the first week on weight Z-score change in PICU and to evaluate the association between weight Z-score change in the PICU and clinical outcomes., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Paediatric Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Unit (PEPaNIC) randomised controlled trial (N = 1440), which focused on the subgroup of patients with longitudinal weight Z-scores available on admission and on the last day in PICU. Patients were randomly allocated to initiation of supplemental PN after one week (Late-PN) or within 24 h (Early-PN) when enteral nutrition was insufficient. The effect of Late-PN versus Early-PN on the change in weight Z-score was investigated, adjusted for risk factors. Moreover, the association between weight Z-score change and clinical outcomes was explored, adjusted for risk factors., Results: Longitudinal weight Z-scores were available for 470 patients. Enteral nutrition intake was equal in the Early-PN and Late-PN group. Less weight Z-score deterioration during PICU stay was associated with a lower risk of new infections (adjusted OR per Z-score increase 0.72 [0.55-0.96], p = 0.02), and with a higher likelihood of an earlier discharge from PICU alive (adjusted HR per Z-score increase 1.22 [1.10-1.37], p < 0.001). During PICU-stay, the change in weight Z-score did not differ among both groups (Late-PN median 0.00 [-0.34-0.12] vs Early-PN median -0.03 [-0.48-0.01], adjusted β = 0.10 [-0.05-0.25], p = 0.18)., Conclusions: Weight deterioration during the PICU stay was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Withholding supplemental PN during the first week did not aggravate weight Z-score deterioration during PICU stay., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01536275., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Background: Initiating parenteral nutrition (PN) within 24 h in critically ill children is inferior to withholding PN during the first week, as was found in the PEPaNIC study. The aims of this study were to investigate de-implementation of early initiation of PN at PICUs worldwide, and to identify factors influencing de-implementation., Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted (May - October 2017), consisting of 41 questions addressing current PN practices, the degree of de-implementation, and factors affecting de-implementation., Results: We analysed 81 responses from 39 countries. Of these 81 respondents, 53 (65%) were aware of the findings of the PEPaNIC study, and 43 (53%) have read the article. In these 43 PICUs, PN was completely withheld during the first week in 10 PICUs, of which 5 already withheld PN (12%), and 5 de-implemented early initiation of PN (12%). Partial de-implementation was reported by 17 (40%) and no de-implementation by 16 (37%). Higher de-implementation rates were observed when the interpreted level of evidence and grade of recommendation of PEPaNIC was high. Predominant reasons for retaining early initiation of PN were concerns on withholding amino acids, the safety in undernourished children and neonates, and the long-term consequences. Furthermore, the respondents were waiting for updated guidelines., Conclusions: One year after the publication of the PEPaNIC trial, only two-thirds of the respondents was aware of the study results. Within this group, early initiation of PN was de-implemented completely in 12% of the PICUs, while 40% asserted partial de-implementation. Increasing the awareness, addressing the intervention-specific questions and more frequently revising international guidelines might help to accelerate de-implementation of ineffective, unproven or harmful healthcare.

Background: Enteral feeding is challenging in critically ill infants. Target intakes are often not achieved as a result of fluid restriction, procedural interruptions and perceived enteral feeding intolerance. In those infants perceived to have poor feeding tolerance, the use of a peptide nutrient-energy dense enteral feed (PEF) may improve nutritional intake and minimise feeding interruptions as a result of gastrointestinal symptoms. The aim of this observational study was to characterise the use of a PEF amongst critically ill infants in two paediatric intensive care units (PICUs)., Methods: Records from critically ill infants aged <12 months admitted to two PICUs were retrospectively reviewed with a PICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 7 days. Achievement of nutritional targets for the duration of PEF was reviewed. Gastrointestinal symptoms, including gastric residual volume, constipation and vomiting, were evaluated as tolerance parameters., Results: In total, 53 infants were included, with a median age on admission of 2.6 months. Median admission weight was 3.9 kg in PICU-1 and 4.7 kg in PICU-2. Median (interquatile range) energy intake in PICU-1 and PICU-2 was 68 (47-92) and 90 (63-124) kcal kg -1 , respectively, and median (interquatile range) protein intake 1.7 (1.1-2.4) g kg -1 and 2.5 (1.6-3.2) g kg -1 , respectively. Feeding was withheld because of feeding intolerance in one infant (4%) on two occasions in PICU-1 for 2.5 h and in two infants (7%) on two occasions in PICU-2 for 19.5 h. Gastric residual mean (SD) volumes were 3.5 (5.4) mL kg -1 in PICU-1 and 16.9 (15.6) mL kg -1 in PICU-2., Conclusions: Peptide nutrient-energy dense feeding in infants admitted to the PICU is feasible, well tolerated and nutritional targets are met. However, with this study design, it is not possible to draw any conclusions regarding the benefit of PEF over standard PE feed in critically ill children and future work is required to clarify this further., (© 2019 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.)

Purpose of Review: The metabolic stress response of a critically ill child evolves over time and thus it seems reasonable that nutritional requirements change during their course of illness as well. This review proposes strategies and considerations for nutritional support during the recovery phase to gain optimal (catch-up) growth with preservation of lean body mass., Recent Findings: Critical illness impairs nutritional status, muscle mass and function, and neurocognition, but early and high intakes of artificial nutrition during the acute phase cannot resolve this. Although (parenteral) nutrient restriction during the acute phase appears to be beneficial, persistent nutrient restriction, when the metabolic stress response resolves, has short-term and long-term detrimental consequences. Requirements increase markedly during the recovery phase to enable recovery and catch-up growth. Such large amounts of intake demand for alternate approach, especially when intestinal problems constitute a barrier for full enteral feeding. As part of the nutritional recovery, mobilization and exercise are essential to achieve catch-up growth with an optimal body composition., Summary: During the recovery phase of paediatric critical illness (catch-up) growth and muscle recovery require nutritional intakes at least two times the resting energy expenditure.

The present study aimed to identify plasticizers present in indwelling plastic medical devices commonly used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We have analyzed a wide range of medical devices (n = 97) daily used in the PICUs of two academic hospitals in Belgium and the Netherlands. Identified compounds varied between the samples. Most of the indwelling medical devices and essential accessories were found to actively leach phthalates and alternative plasticizers. Results indicated that DEHP was predominantly present as plasticizer (60 of 97 samples), followed by bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA, 32 of 97), bis(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHT, 24 of 97), tris(2-ethylhexyl) trimellitate (TOTM, 20 of 97), and tributyl-O-acetyl citrate (ATBC, 10 of 97). Other plasticizers, such as di-isononyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH, 2 of 97), di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP, 4 of 97), di(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP, 4 of 97) and di-isodecyl phthalate (DiDP, 2 of 97) were detected in < 5% of the investigated samples. Several devices contained multiple plasticizers, e.g. devices containing TOTM contained also DEHP and DEHT. Our data indicate that PICU patients are exposed to a wide range of plasticizers, including the controversial DEHP. Future studies should investigate the exposure to APs in children staying in the PICU and the possible health effects thereof., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reaching an optimal nutritional intake is challenging in critically ill infants. One possible way to minimise nutritional deficits is the use of protein and energy-enriched (PE)-formulas. We aimed to describe weight achievement and gastrointestinal symptoms in infants admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) while receiving PE-formula for a prolonged period., Methods: Records from infants admitted to a multidisciplinary PICU and using PE-formula were analysed retrospectively. Infants were eligible if they received PE-formula daily for at least 2 weeks. Weight achievement was determined as the difference between weight-for-age (WFA) Z-scores at the start and end of PE-formula use. Gastrointestinal symptoms, including gastric residual volume, constipation and vomiting, were evaluated as tolerance parameters., Results: Seventy infants with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 76 (30-182) days were eligible. The PICU duration was 50 (35-83) days during which they received PE-formula for 30 (21-54) days. Predominant admission diagnoses were post-cardiac surgery, respiratory and cardiac diagnosis. A significant mean (SD) WFA Z-score increase of 0.48 (1.10) (P < 0.001) and a median (IQR) weight gain of 5.80 (3.28-9.04) g kg -1 day -1 was observed. Multivariate regression showed that a lower WFA Z-score at start was associated with a higher WFA Z-score increase during PE-formula use (β -0.35 (95% confidence interval =  -0.50 to -0.19); P < 0.001). The maximum 24-h gastric residual volume was 8.1 mL (IQR = 2.2-14.3) for each 1 kg in bodyweight. Three (4%) infants were treated for diarrhoea and three infants were treated for vomiting., Conclusions: The majority of infants with a prolonged PICU stay showed weight improvement when using PE-formula. PE-formula was well tolerated because gastrointestinal symptoms only occurred in few infants., (© 2018 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.)

Importance: Undernourishment has been associated with poor outcomes of critical illness in children. The effects of withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) for 1 week in undernourished critically ill children are unknown., Objective: To assess the outcome effects of withholding PN for 1 week in undernourished critically ill children., Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a subanalysis of the randomized clinical trial Pediatric Early vs Late Parenteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Unit (PEPaNIC; N = 1440), which focused on the subgroup of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients identified as undernourished on admission. Children included in the PEPaNIC trial were enrolled between June 18, 2012, and July 27, 2015. Undernourishment was defined as weight-for-age z score less than -2 in children younger than 1 year, and body mass index-for-age z score less than -2 in children 1 year or older. Data analysis was conducted from August 3, 2017, to July 6, 2018., Interventions: Patients were randomized to initiation of supplemental PN within 24 hours (early PN) or after 1 week (late PN) when enteral nutrition was insufficient., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were risk of new infections acquired in the PICU and time to live PICU discharge, assessed via multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses, adjusted for risk factors., Results: A total of 289 of 1440 children (20.1%), term newborn to age 17 years, were identified as undernourished, of whom 150 of 717 patients (20.9%) were in the late PN group and 139 of 723 patients (19.2%) were in the early PN group. On admission, characteristics were similar among the treatment groups. Mean (SD) weight z scores were -3.33 (1.18) in the late PN group and -3.21 (1.09) in the early PN group. Compared with well-nourished PICU patients, undernourishment on admission was associated with lower likelihood of an earlier live PICU discharge (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P = .03). Among undernourished PICU patients, late PN reduced the risk of new infections by 11.0% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.78; P = .01), and shortened the duration of PICU stay by a median of 2 days (earlier live PICU discharge: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.75; P = .01). The safety outcomes mortality, incidence of hypoglycemia during the first week, and incidence of weight deterioration during PICU stay were similar between the treatment groups., Conclusions and Relevance: In undernourished critically ill children, withholding PN for 1 week was clinically superior to early PN., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01536275.

Background: Previous randomised studies showed that withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week of critical illness was superior to early initiation (<24-48 h) of parenteral nutrition in children and adults. However, neonates are considered more susceptible to macronutrient deficits. We investigated the effect of withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week in critically ill, term neonates., Methods: We previously did a randomised, controlled study (PEPaNIC) of children aged up to 17 years admitted to paediatric intensive-care units (ICUs) in three hospitals in Belgium, Canada, and the Netherlands randomly assigned (1:1) to either standard care of parenteral nutrition initiated early within 24 h of admission to an ICU or late parenteral nutrition (where supplemental parenteral nutrition was withheld for 1 week after admission to the ICU). In this preplanned, secondary subanalysis of PEPaNIC, we looked at data from critically ill, term neonate participants (gestational age ≥37 weeks) aged up to 28 days (studied in overlapping age groups of ≤4 weeks, ≤1 week, and <1 day-ie, age at admission). In both the early parenteral nutrition and late parenteral nutrition groups, enteral nutrition was initiated as soon as possible and increased according to local protocols. Outcome assessors and investigators not directly involved in the paediatric ICU were not informed of treatment allocation. The primary endpoints were incidence of new infections and duration of paediatric ICU dependency (quantified as the number of days in the paediatric ICU and likelihood of earlier live discharge from the ICU), analysed based on intention to treat. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for the following risk factors: centre, Paediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, Paediatric Index of Mortality 2 score, diagnosis group, and weight-for-age Z scores on admission. Secondary safety outcomes were mortality (at 90 days, during the intervention, in the paediatric ICU, and in the hospital) and hypoglycaemic incidents during the intervention. All patients in the respective groups were included in the safety analysis., Findings: Between June 18, 2012, and July 27, 2015, we included 209 participants in this substudy, 145 of whom were aged up to and including 1 week and 45 aged younger than 1 day. In neonates aged up to and including 4 weeks, late parenteral nutrition increased the likelihood of earlier live discharge from the paediatric ICU compared with early parenteral nutrition (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·61, 95% CI 1·19-2·20; p=0·0021) but did not affect the risk of infection. The risk of infection in neonates aged up to and including 1 week and younger than 1 day was lower with late parenteral nutrition than with early parenteral nutrition (adjusted odds ratios [OR] 0·36, 95% CI 0·15-0·83, p=0·017; and 0·10, 0·01-0·64, p=0·015, respectively). For neonates aged up to and including 1 week, the likelihood of an earlier live discharge from the ICU was higher with late parenteral nutrition (adjusted HR 1·69, 95% CI 1·16-2·46; p=0·0063). For neonates younger than 1 day, adjusted HR was 1·95 (95% CI 0·93-4·12; p=0·078). Mortality at all studied timepoints was similar between the groups for all ages; however, in neonates aged up to and including 4 weeks and aged up to and including 1 week, the risk of hypoglycaemia was higher with late parenteral nutrition (23% vs 14%; adjusted OR 3·05, 95% CI 1·27-7·35, p=0·013; and 24% vs 14%; 3·57, 1·23-10·45, p=0·019, respectively., Interpretation: In critically ill, term neonates, withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week was clinically superior to standard care of initiating parenteral nutrition within 24 h for short-term outcomes. However, withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week significantly increased the risk of developing hypoglycaemia, which necessitates long-term follow-up of these children before late parenteral nutrition can be confidently recommended for this vulnerable patient group., Funding: Flemish Agency for Innovation through Science and Technology, Methusalem-Programme Flemish Government, European Research Council, Fonds NutsOhra, Stichting Agis-Zorginnovatie, and the Sophia Research-Foundation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this research is to study effects of a 4-week high-protein (HP) diet on energy intake, resting energy expenditure (REE), protein turnover and body composition in children with obesity., Methods: In this randomized placebo-controlled single-blind crossover study, children with obesity ( n  = 14; mean age: 10.1 years ± 1.2 standard deviation; body mass index-standard deviation score [BMI-SDS]: 2.8 ± 0.5) received an ad libitum HP (+50 g protein per day) or normal-protein (NP) diet for 4 weeks with a washout period of ≥2 weeks. Energy intake, REE, protein turnover, weight, BMI-SDS and body composition were measured., Results: No differences were found in energy intake or REE between HP and NP. There was an increased urea production and phenylalanine hydroxylation after HP compared with NP ( p  < 0.05). There was an increased rise in fat-free mass after HP compared with NP (∆HP: 0.8 ± 0.8 kg vs. ∆NP: 0.1 ± 0.6 kg, p  < 0.05). BMI and BMI-SDS increased during the study (BMI-SDS start: 2.8 ± 0.5, end: 2.9 ± 0.5, p  < 0.05) without a difference between groups., Conclusions: A 4-week HP diet with ad libitum food intake did not affect energy intake and energy expenditure in children with obesity. BMI increased, although that could be partly explained by an increase in fat-free mass.

Background: The multicentre randomised controlled PEPaNIC trial showed that withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) during the first week of critical illness in children was clinically superior to providing early PN. This study describes the cost-effectiveness of this new nutritional strategy., Methods: Direct medical costs were calculated with use of a micro-costing approach. We compared the costs of late versus early initiation of PN (n = 673 versus n = 670 patients) in the Belgian and Dutch study populations from a hospital perspective, using Student's t test with bootstrapping. Main cost drivers were identified and the impact of new infections on the total costs was assessed., Results: Mean direct medical costs for patients receiving late PN (€26.680, IQR €10.090-28.830 per patient) were 21% lower (-€7.180, p = 0.007) than for patients receiving early PN (€33.860, IQR €11.080-34.720). Since late PN was more effective and less costly, this strategy was superior to early PN. The lower costs for PN only contributed 2.1% to the total cost reduction. The main cost driver was intensive care hospitalisation costs (-€4.120, p = 0.003). The patients who acquired a new infection (14%) were responsible for 41% of the total costs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistency across both healthcare systems., Conclusions: Late initiation of PN decreased the direct medical costs for hospitalisation in critically ill children, beyond the expected lower costs for withholding PN. Avoiding new infections by late initiation of PN yielded a large cost reduction. Hence, late initiation of PN was superior to early initiation of PN largely via its effect on new infections., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01536275 . Registered on 16 February 2012.

Background & Aims: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is considered the gold standard to determine resting energy expenditure (REE) but its availability in PICUs worldwide is limited. Ventilator-derived VCO 2 could potentially improve the possibility of performing REE measurements. We investigated whether ventilator-derived VCO 2 values are comparable to IC-derived VCO 2 values and can clinically be used in clinical practice to determine REE., Methods: VCO 2 -values were simultaneously collected in mechanically ventilated children from IC (Deltatrac ® ) and Servo-I ® ventilator on a minute base over at least 10 min period of steady state. REE was calculated using the modified Weir formula (for IC) or REE = 5.5*VCO 2 (L/min)*1440 (for the Servo-I values) and compared with frequently used predictive equations by Schofield and the WHO to calculate REE., Results: Measurements were performed in 41 children; median age 2 years. The mean relative difference between VCO 2 measured by IC and Servo-I ® was 15.6% (p = 0.002), and limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis were wide. Comparable measurements, defined as a difference ≤10% between IC and Servo-I ® VCO 2 values, were seen in 18 (44%) children, but this proportion was 70% in children ≥15 kg. In this group, REE could be accurately predicted using Servo-I ® derived VCO 2 values and this method was superior to the use of predictive equations. The Servo-I ® derived VCO 2 values were not sufficiently accurate for the large proportion of children weighing <15 kg., Conclusions: In children ≥15 kg, VCO 2 measurements of the Servo-I ® seem sufficiently accurate for use in clinical practice and may be used to determine energy expenditure in the future., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)