1. Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes in an Aging Population: An STS INTERMACS Analysis.
- Author
-
Emerson D, Chikwe J, Catarino P, Hassanein M, Deng L, Cantor RS, Roach A, Cole R, Esmailian F, Kobashigawa J, Moriguchi J, and Kirklin JK
- Subjects
- Age Factors, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Physical Functional Performance, Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation, Prosthesis Implantation statistics & numerical data, Survival Analysis, United States epidemiology, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left diagnosis, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left physiopathology, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left psychology, Walk Test methods, Walk Test statistics & numerical data, Heart Failure mortality, Heart Failure physiopathology, Heart Failure therapy, Heart-Assist Devices adverse effects, Heart-Assist Devices classification, Heart-Assist Devices statistics & numerical data, Quality of Life
- Abstract
Background: Survival, functional outcomes, and quality of life after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are ill-defined in elderly patients, and with new-generation devices., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate survival, functional outcomes, and quality of life after LVAD in contemporary practice., Methods: Adults receiving durable LVADs between January 1, 2010, and March 1, 2020, were identified from the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) database. The primary outcome was adjusted survival; secondary outcomes included quality of life rated using a visual analogue scale (where 0 represents "worst health" and 100 "best health"); 6-minute walk distance; stroke; device malfunction; and rehospitalization, stratified by patient age. Median follow-up was 15 months (IQR: 6-32 months)., Results: The cohort comprised 68.9% (n = 16,808) patients aged <65 years, 26.3% (n = 6,418) patients aged 65-75 years, and 4.8% (n = 1,182) patients aged >75 years, who were predominantly male (n = 19,119, 78%) and on destination therapy (n = 12,425, 51%). Competing outcomes analysis demonstrated mortality (70% CIs) of 34% (33%-34%), 54% (54%-55%), and 66% (64%-68%) for patients aged <65, 65-75, and >75 years, respectively, which improved during the study in patients aged >75 years. Newer-generation devices were associated with reduced late mortality (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.25-0.49). Stroke, device malfunction or thrombosis, and rehospitalizations decreased with increasing age (all P < 0.01). Median 6-minute walk distance increased from 0 feet (IQR: 0-665 feet) to 1,065 feet (IQR: 642-1,313 feet) (P < 0.001), and quality of life improved from 40 (IQR: 15-60) to 75 (IQR: 60-90) (P < 0.001) after LVAD in all age groups., Conclusions: In elderly patients, LVADs are associated with increased functional capacity, similar improvements in quality of life, and fewer complications compared with younger patients., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Society of Thoracic Surgeons funded and designed the data analysis which was performed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Data Coordinating Center, which had primary responsibility for collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr Kirklin has received partial salary support, paid to his institution, from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF