Search

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognized complication in pediatric cancer patients. We aimed to determine the frequency of central venous catheter (CVC) removal and survival impact of children with cancer who develop VTE. After ethics approval, a retrospective population-based study of cancer patients less than 21 years between 2005 and 2020, in the Maritime Provinces Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island was conducted. Clinical data was collected from hospital charts and online medical records. Data on demographics, cancer diagnosis and treatment, diagnosis of VTE, use of CVC, were assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were computed and compared among study groups. This study included 770 patients with a male to female ratio of 1.1:1. There were 49 patients with symptomatic VTE, 49 patients with clinically unsuspected VTE, and 671 patients with no VTE. There were 15 (1.9%) non-CVC-symptomatic (ncsVTE), 34 (4.4%) CVC-symptomatic (csVTE), 40 (5.2%) non-CVC-clinically unsuspected (ncuVTE), 9 (1.2%) CVC-clinically unsuspected (cVTE), and 671 (87%) no VTE patients. The mean number of CVCs required during treatment was significantly higher among patients with VTE (p < 0.001). Both symptomatic and clinically unsuspected VTE required significantly more CVCs compared to no VTE patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049 respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed ncsVTE patients' survival was significantly reduced compared to all other patients (p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that pediatric oncology patients with ncsVTE have significantly lower survival. This suggests that ncsVTE may be a biomarker for increased disease burden. This study also demonstrated that clinically unsuspected VTE had significantly more CVCs placed during treatment compared to patients without a VTE, indicating the need for better screening., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The optimal anesthetic mode in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has yet to be clearly identified. Patients undergoing TJA may recieve spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA). While arthroplasty literature indicates differences in postoperative morbidity, hip fracture literature does not show clear superiority of SA or GA. The purpose of this study was to further investigate this relationship and determine if there is a significant difference in morbidity and mortality between GA and SA in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty., Methods: Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA from February 2007 to February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, creating four cohorts: THA/GA (n = 1,266), THA/SA (n = 1,084), TKA/GA (n = 882), and THA/SA (n = 2,067). Readmission within 90 days, mortality within 365 days, and thromboembolic events within 30 days postoperatively were compared using logistic regression, controlling for age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index., Results: The odds of experiencing a deep venous thrombosis within 30 days postoperatively were elevated in the analysis of both the THA/GA (odds ratio (OR) = 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5 to 7.0; P = .004) and the TKA/GA (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.0; P = .005) groups. Similarly, the risk of pulmonary embolism as higher in the THA/GA cohort (OR = 3.9; 95% CI: 1.2 to 17.3; P = .04). There were also higher odds of mortality within 365 days postoperatively in THA/GA patients (OR = 4.3; 95% CI: 1.7 to 13.0; P = .004). No other differences existed among TKA patients., Conclusions: Based upon these data, both SA and GA are reasonable options for primary TKA with similar risk profiles. However, GA may be associated with higher rates of deep venous thrombosis in TJA and pulmonary embolism in THA. General anesthesia (GA) was also loosely associated with increased mortality within 1 year of THA, but this result should be considered with caution., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: While decreased time to fixation in femur fractures improves mortality, it remains unclear if the same relationship exists for pelvic fractures. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) is a data repository for trauma hospitals in the United States (injury characteristics, perioperative data, procedures, 30-day complications), and we used this to investigate early, significant complications after pelvic-ring injuries., Methods: The NTDB (2015-2016) was queried to capture operative pelvic ring injuries in adult patients with injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 15. Complications included medical and surgical complications, as well as 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the association between days to procedure and complications after adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities., Results: 2325 patients met inclusion criteria. 532 (23.0%) sustained complications, and 72 (3.2%) died within the first 30 days. The most common complications were deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (5.7%), acute kidney injury (AKI) (4.6%), and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission (4.4%). In a multivariate analysis, days to procedure was independently significantly associated with complications, with an adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.06 (1.03-1.09, P < 0.001), best interpreted as a 6% increase in the odds of complication or death for each additional day., Conclusion: Time to pelvic fixation is a significant and modifiable risk factor for major complications and death. This suggests we should prioritize time to pelvic fixation on trauma patients to minimize mortality and major complications., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The high prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) would justify systematic screening of these patients or higher therapeutic dose of heparin for thromboprophylaxis., Material and Method: We performed a systematic echo-Doppler of the lower limb proximal veins during the first 48 h (visit 1) and from 7 to 9 days after visit 1 (visit 2) in consecutive patients admitted to the ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary hospital for severe proven COVID-19 during the second wave. All patients received intermediate-dose heparin (IDH). The primary objective was to determine DVT incidence on venous Doppler ultrasound. Secondary objectives were to determine whether the presence of DVT modifies the anticoagulation regimen, the incidence of major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria, and the mortality rate of patients with and without DVT., Results: We included 48 patients (30 [62.5%] men) with a median age of 63 years [IQR, 54-70]. The prevalence of proximal deep vein thrombosis was 4.2% (2/48). In these two patients, after DVT diagnosis, anticoagulation was changed from intermediate to curative dose. Two patients (4.2%) had a major bleeding complication according to ISTH criteria. Among the 48 patients, 9 (18.8%) died before hospital discharge. No DVT or pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in these deceased patients during their hospital stay., Conclusion: In critically ill patients with COVID-19, management with IDH results in a low incidence of DVT. Although our study is not designed to demonstrate any difference in outcome, our results do not suggest any signal of harm when using intermediate-dose heparin (IDH) COVID-19 with a frequency of major bleeding complications less than 5%.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) stands as the leading cause of preventable death within hospitals in the United States. Although there have been some studies investigating the incidence rates of VTE, there has yet to be a large-scale study elucidating disparities in sex, race, income, region, and seasons in patients with VTE. The goal of this study was to report the disparities in race, sex, income, region, and seasons in patients with VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in hospitalized patients from 2016 to 2019., Methods: We used the United States National Inpatients Sample database to identify inpatients diagnosed with PE, DVT, and PE and DVT from 2016 to 2019. The inpatient incidence per thousand was calculated for sex and race using the weighted sample model. The regional and monthly incidence of DVT and PE per thousand inpatients and risk of incidence were calculated. Patients' characteristics including hospital type, bed size, median length of stay, median total charges, and mortality were also collected., Results: We examined 455,111 cases of VTE, 177,410 cases of DVT, 189,271 cases of PE, and 88,430 cases of both DVT and PE combined. Over the study period, we observed a statistically significant trend among PE hospitalization incidences. There was a strong and positive correlation between DVT and PE inpatients. Black inpatients had the highest cumulative incidence of hospitalizations in all cohorts with 10.36 per 1000 in PE and 9.1 per 1000 in DVT. Asian and Pacific Islander inpatients had the lowest cumulative incidence with 4.42 per 1000 in PE and 4.28 per 1000 in DVT. Females showed the lowest cumulative incidence with 7.47 per 1000 in PE and 6.53 per 1000 in DVT. The Mountain region was the highest among PE hospitalizations with 9.62 per 1000. For DVT, the Middle Atlantic region was the highest at 8.65 per 1000. The in-hospital mortality rate was the highest among the PE hospitalizations at 7.3%. Also, the trend analysis showed significant increases among all groups., Conclusions: Over the study period (2016-2019), we report the racial, biological sex, and geographical disparities from the National Inpatient Sample database, highlighting that Black inpatients had the highest incidence of PE and DVT, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander inpatients had the lowest incidences of PE and DVT. Moreover, women had a lower incidence compared with men. The observed regional variations indicated that the incidence of PE was highest in the Mountain region, whereas the incidence of DVT was lowest in the Middle Atlantic region. There was an increase in the mortality of inpatients diagnosed with VTE reflecting the growing burden of this condition in the US health care system., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Previous reports and meta-analyses derived from small case series reported a mortality rate of up to 40% in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 associated cerebral venous thrombosis (COVID-CVT). We assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes in an international cohort of patients with COVID-CVT., Patients and Methods: This was a registry study of consecutive COVID-CVT patients diagnosed between March 2020 and March 2023. Data collected by the International Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Consortium from patients with CVT diagnosed between 2017 and 2018 served as a comparison. Outcome analyses were adjusted for age and sex., Results: We included 70 patients with COVID-CVT from 23 hospitals in 15 countries and 206 controls from 14 hospitals in 13 countries. The proportion of women was smaller in the COVID-CVT group (50% vs 68%, p  < 0.01). A higher proportion of COVID-CVT patients presented with altered mental state (44% vs 25%, p  < 0.01), the median thrombus load was higher in COVID-CVT patients (3 [IQR 2-4] vs 2 [1-3], p  < 0.01) and the length of hospital stay was longer compared to controls (11 days [IQR 7-20] vs 8 [4-15], p  = 0.02). In-hospital mortality did not differ (5/67 [7%, 95% CI 3-16] vs 7/206 [3%, 2-7], aOR 2.6 [95% CI 0.7-9]), nor did the frequency of functional independence after 6 months (modified Rankin Scale 0-2; 45/58 [78%, 95% CI 65-86] vs 161/185 [87%, 81-91], aOR 0.5 [95% CI 0.2-1.02])., Conclusion: In contrast to previous studies, the in-hospital mortality rate and functional outcomes during follow-up did not differ between COVID-CVT patients and the pre-COVID-19 controls., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AS reports a grant from the Swiss Heart Foundation. MRH reports grants from SITEM Research Support Funds and Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, not directly related to this manuscript. MA reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Covidien, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, and Amgen. JMC has received grants paid to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer, and payments paid to his institution for data safety monitoring board participation by Bayer. JMF has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo as well as grants from Bayer. DAS reports travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, speaker fees from Bayer, and Advisory Board participation for AstraZeneca. TT has received personal fees from Argenx, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Inventiva, and Portola Pharma. NR received consultant fees from Novartis. KJ has received academic grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF agreement (ALFGBG 965417) for research on CVT. SP received research support from BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, European Union, German Federal Joint Committee Innovation Fund, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Helena Laboratories and Werfen as well as speakers’ honoraria/consulting fees from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Portola, and Werfen (all outside the submitted work). TNN reports advisory board Idorsia, Brainomix. KA reports a grant from Swiss National Science Foundation and Medtronic advisory board participation in 2022, not related to this manuscript. EL has received academic grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF agreement (ALFGBG 942851), Swedish Neurologic Society, Elsa and Gustav Lindh’s Foundation, Wennerströms’ Foundation, P-O Ahl’s Foundation and Rune and Ulla Amlöv’s Foundation for research on CVT. All other co-authors report no disclosures.

Background/aim: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is extremely poor. This study investigated whether local ablation-a curative treatment similar to resection-could improve the prognosis of patients with Child-Pugh B/C PVTT., Patients and Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2023, 25 patients with Child-Pugh B/C PVTT HCC were enrolled, and their overall survival with radiofrequency ablation treatment and the associated drivers were investigated., Results: Overall survival (median 282 days) differed between the group treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, 285 days) and the group without it (159 days, p=0.0151). The median survival in the esophagogastric variceal exacerbation group (120.5 days) was shorter than that in the non-exacerbation group (284.0 days, p=0.00964). In multivariate analysis, concomitant TACE had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.121 (p=0.0097), and the exacerbation of esophagogastric varices had a HR of 6.761 (p=0.01)., Conclusion: Local ablation for PVTT may promote patient survival specifically by inhibiting the exacerbation of portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The anticoagulation strategy of switching to rivaroxaban after 1 week of initial low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is recommended by a guideline for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the initial rivaroxaban dose in the switching strategy, as well as the effectiveness and safety of the early switching (less than 1 week) to rivaroxaban, remain inadequately substantiated. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early switching from LMWH to maintenance therapy of rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) for acute iliofemoral DVT., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients with acute iliofemoral DVT who received initial LMWH anticoagulation followed by rivaroxaban maintenance therapy. The clinical outcomes were compared between early (LMWH course ≤7 days) and routine (LMWH course >7 days) switching strategies within 3 months of initiating anticoagulation., Results: 217 patients were included, 59 (27.2%) receiving early switching and 158 (72.8%) receiving routine switching. Compared with routine switching, patients with early switching had a significantly shorter hospital stay (7 days vs. 14 days, P < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly positively correlated with the duration of LMWH (r = 0.762, P < 0.001). The incidences of recurrent venous thromboembolism (5.1% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.606), major bleeding (0% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.564), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (1.7% vs. 2.5%, P = 1.000) and all-cause mortality (6.8% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.283) were not statistically different between the 2 groups., Conclusions: Direct early switching from LMWH to maintenance therapy of rivaroxaban is effective and safe for acute iliofemoral DVT., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The duration of anticoagulation for a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) should balance the likelihood of VTE recurrence against the risk of major bleeding., Objectives: Analyze rates and case-fatality rates (CFRs) of recurrent VTE and major bleeding after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with a first unprovoked VTE after at least 3 months of anticoagulation., Methods: We compared the rates and CFRs in patients of the Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica (RIETE) and Contemporary management and outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism registries. We used logistic regression models to identify predictors for recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) and major bleeding., Results: Of 8261 patients with unprovoked VTE in RIETE registry, 4012 (48.6%) had isolated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 4250 had PE. Follow-up (median, 318 days) showed 543 recurrent DVTs, 540 recurrent PEs, 71 major bleeding episodes, and 447 deaths. The Contemporary management and outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism registry yielded similar results. Corresponding CFRs of recurrent DVT, PE, and major bleeding were 0.4%, 4.6%, and 24%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, initial PE presentation (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03; 95% CI, 2.49-3.69), dementia (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.01-2.13), and anemia (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91) predicted recurrent PE, whereas older age (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.15-3.87), inflammatory bowel disease (HR, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.00-19.3), and anemia (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.35-3.73) predicted major bleeding. Prognostic scores were formulated, with C statistics of 0.63 for recurrent PE and 0.69 for major bleeding., Conclusion: Recurrent DVT and PE were frequent but had low CFRs (0.4% and 4.6%, respectively) after discontinuing anticoagulation. On the contrary, major bleeding was rare but had high CFR (24%). A few clinical factors may predict these outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests Outside the submitted work, Dr Bikdeli is supported by a Career Development Award from the American Heart Association and VIVA Physicians (#938814). Dr Bikdeli was supported by the Scott Schoen and Nancy Adams IGNITE Award and is supported by the Mary Ann Tynan Research Scientist award from the Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the Heart and Vascular Center Junior Faculty Award from Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr Bikdeli reports that he was a consulting expert, on behalf of the plaintiff, for litigation related to two specific brand models of IVC filters. Dr Bikdeli has not been involved in the litigation in 2022-2024 nor has he received any compensation in 2022-2024. Dr Bikdeli reports that he is a member of the Medical Advisory Board for the North American Thrombosis Forum, and serves in the Data Safety and Monitory Board of the NAIL-IT trial funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and Translational Sciences. Dr Bikdeli is a collaborating consultant with the International Consulting Associates and the US Food and Drug Administration in a study to generate knowledge about utilization, predictors, retrieval, and safety of IVC filters. Dr Bikdeli receives compensation as an Associated Editor for the New England Journal of Medicine Journal Watch Cardiology, as an Associate Editor for Thrombosis Research, and as an Executive Associate Editor for JACC, and is a Section Editor for Thrombosis and Haemostasis (no compensation). The other authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are a limited number of studies investigating the effect of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients presenting with both pulmonary embolism and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and prognostic significance of DVT in patients with PE-COPD., Methods: COPD patients admitted with a diagnosis of PE to our tertiary hospital between January 2016 and January 2021 were retrospectively evaluated with an electronic hospital database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to reveal independent prognostic factors., Results: Two hundred thirty-three patients (mean age 65.1 ± 12.2, 158 men (67.5 %)) were included. DVT was present at the time of diagnosis in 45 (19.31 %) of the patients. Patients with DVT tend to have more comorbidities, central pulmonary embolism, higher CRP and d-dimer levels, and SPESI score (p<0.05). After performing multivariate analyses, the presence of DVT (HR=3.48, CI: 1.02- 11.88, p = 0.046), ischemic heart disease (HR=3.82, CI: 1.38- 10.80, p = 0.01), and malignancy (HR=4.85, CI: 1.53- 15.41, p = 0.007) were found to be independent factors in predicting 90-day mortality., Conclusions: In PE-COPD patients, co-existing DVT may predict a worse outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background:  The diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with compression ultrasonography (CUS) may be hindered by residual intravascular obstruction after previous DVT. A reference CUS, an additional ultrasound performed at anticoagulant discontinuation, may improve the diagnostic work-up of suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT by providing baseline images for future comparison., Objectives:  To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routinely performing reference CUS in DVT patients., Methods:  Patient-level data ( n  = 96) from a prospective management study (Theia study; NCT02262052) and claims data were used in a decision analytic model to compare 12 scenarios for diagnostic management of suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT. Estimated health care costs and mortality due to misdiagnosis, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and bleeding during the first year of follow-up after presentation with suspected recurrence were compared., Results:  All six scenarios including reference CUS had higher estimated 1-year costs (€1,763-€1,913) than the six without reference CUS (€1,192-€1,474). Costs were higher because reference CUS results often remained unused, as 20% of patients (according to claims data) would return with suspected recurrent DVT. Estimated mortality was comparable in scenarios with (14.8-17.9 per 10,000 patients) and without reference CUS (14.0-18.5 per 10,000). None of the four potentially most desirable scenarios included reference CUS., Conclusion:  One-year health care costs of diagnostic strategies for suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT including reference CUS are higher compared to strategies without reference CUS, without mortality benefit. These results can inform policy-makers regarding use of health care resources during follow-up after DVT. From a cost-effectiveness perspective, the findings do not support the routine application of reference CUS., Competing Interests: F.A.K. reports grants or contracts from Bayer, BMS, BSCI, MSD, Leo Pharma, Actelion, VarmX, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, The Dutch Thrombosis Association, The Dutch Heart Foundation, and The Horizon Europe Program, all unrelated to this work and paid to his institution. All other authors report no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Prognostication for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) remains difficult. We sought to validate the SI 2 NCAL 2 C score in an international cohort., Materials and Methods: The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score was originally developed to predict poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6) at 6 months, and mortality at 30 days and 1 year using data from the International CVT Consortium. The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score uses 9 variables: the absence of any female-sex-specific risk factors, intracerebral hemorrhage, central nervous system infection, focal neurological deficits, coma, age, lower level of hemoglobin, higher level of glucose, and cancer. The ACTION-CVT study was an international retrospective study that enrolled consecutive patients across 27 centers. The poor outcome score was validated using 90-day mRS due to lack of follow-up at the 6-month time-point in the ACTION-CVT cohort. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plots. Missing data were imputed using the additive regression and predictive mean matching methods. Bootstrapping was performed with 1000 iterations., Results: Mortality data were available for 950 patients and poor outcome data were available for 587 of 1,025 patients enrolled in ACTION-CVT. Compared to the International CVT Consortium, the ACTION-CVT cohort was older, less often female, and with milder clinical presentation. Mortality was 2.5% by 30 days and 6.0% by one year. At 90-days, 16.7% had a poor outcome. The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score had an AUC of 0.74 [95% CI 0.69-0.79] for 90-day poor outcome, 0.72 [0.60-0.82] for mortality by 30 days, and 0.82 [0.76-0.88] for mortality by one year., Conclusions: The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score had acceptable to good performance in an international external validation cohort. The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score warrants additional validation studies in diverse populations and clinical implementation studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Thanh Nguyen reports research support from Medtronic and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology; advisory board with Brainomix, Aruna Bio; Associate Editor of Stroke. Erik Lindgren reports research support from the Swedish state, ALF agreement (ALFGBG 942851), the Swedish Neurological Society, Elsa and Gustav Lindh's Foundation, Wennerström's Foundation, P-O Ahl's Foundation, and the Rune and Ulla Amlöv's Foundation. Katarina Jood reports research support from the Swedish state ALF agreement (ALFGBG-965417). Mirjam R. Heldner reports grants from SITEM Research Support Funds and Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, not directly related to this manuscript. Thalia S Field reports honoraria for advisory board work for HLS Therapeutics, Roche Canada, AstraZeneca, in-kind study medication from Bayer Canada, is on the board of DESTINE Health, and is supported by a Heart and Stroke/Sauder Family Professorship of Stroke Research at the University of British Columbia. Christoph Stretz reports departmental funding (funds managed by Rhode Island Hospital) for his site's participation in the Neuro AFib study from Massachusetts General Hospital/BSC. Nils Henninger was supported by NINDS R21NS131756 during the conduct of this study (unrelated). Turgut Tatlisumak serves or has served on advisory boards for Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Inventiva, and Portola Pharma and received research funding from European Union, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, and Wennerström's Foundation. Diana Aguiar de Sousa reports advisory board participation for Astrazenica, Organon, and Johnson & Johnson, speaker fees from Bial, Bayer, and Astrazeneca, and DSMB participation for the SECRET trial (all unrelated)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: There is uncertainty in the management of cancer-associated isolated splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT)., Objectives: To describe the natural history of SpVT by cancer type and thrombus composition and to review anticoagulation (AC) practices and associated rates of usual-site venous thromboembolism (VTE), major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (MB/CRNMB), recanalization/progression, and mortality., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients with SpVT at 2 cancer care centers in Houston, Texas. We estimated the incidence of usual-site VTE and MB/CRNMB at 6 months using competing risk methods and examined venous patency in a subset of patients with repeat imaging. We assessed associations with mortality using Cox regression., Results: Among 15 342 patients with an incident cancer diagnosis from 2011 to 2020, we identified 298 with isolated SpVT. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and SpVT (n = 146) had the highest disease prevalence (20%), lowest rate of AC treatment (2%), and similar rate of usual-site VTE (4.2%) vs those without SpVT (5.2%) at 6 months, though tumor thrombus vs bland was associated with worse overall survival. In patients with non-HCC bland SpVT (n = 114), AC (n = 37) was more common in those with non-upper gastrointestinal cancers and fewer comorbidities. AC was associated with more recanalization (44% vs 15%, P = .041) but no differences in usual-site VTE, MB/CRNMB, or mortality at 6 months., Conclusion: Cancer-associated isolated SpVT is a common but heterogeneous thrombotic disease that is treated differently from usual-site VTE. Tumor thrombus is a negative prognostic factor. Initiation of AC in bland thrombi requires judicious consideration of thrombotic and bleeding risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited evidence is available on management of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT)., Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for SVT treatment., Methods: Studies were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases according to PRISMA guidelines. We assessed any recanalization, full recanalization, recurrence, mortality, and major bleeding as outcomes of interest. Results were reported as weighted mean prevalence (WMP) with 95% CI. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions have been performed to address heterogeneity and adjust for potential confounders., Results: We included a total of 16 studies (17 datasets) on 648 patients with SVT treated with DOACs. We found any recanalization in 60.3% (95% CI: 41.8%-76.3%; I 2  = 84.9%; P < .001) and full recanalization in 51.7% (95% CI: 36.0%-67.0%; I 2  = 87.4%; P < .001). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 2.8% (95% CI: 1.4%-5.9%; I 2  = 0%; P = .787) and death in 3.4% (95% CI: 1.6%-7.3%; I 2  = 13.2%; P = .318) of patients. Major bleeding was reported by 5.8% (95% CI: 3.7%-8.9%; I 2  = 29.2%; P = .125) of patients. Results were consistent when separately analyzing prospective studies, retrospective studies, studies on cirrhotic patients, and studies enrolling patients with portal vein thrombosis. Meta-regression analyses showed that an increasing age and cancer impacted the rate of recanalization. Cirrhosis was associated with a higher rate of major bleeding and mortality., Conclusion: The results of the present study, mostly based on observational studies, suggest good safety and efficacy profiles of DOACs in patients with SVT. Randomized studies are needed to corroborate our findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There are no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of the study was to investigate baseline inflammatory, hemostatic indicators and new-onset deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with the risk of mortality in COVID-19 inpatients. In this single-center study, a total of 401 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were enrolled from December 1, 2022 to January 31, 2023. The basic information, first laboratory examination results, imaging examination, and outcome-related indicators were compared between patients in the moderate and severe subgroups. We found that baseline D-dimer and baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) levels were associated with new-onset DVT and death in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The odds ratio (OR) of baseline D-dimer and baseline ANC with mortality was 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.28; P  < .001) and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.06-1.21; P  < .001). Baseline ANC was associated with the risk of death in severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients, irrespective of the DVT status. In addition, a significantly higher serum neutrophil activity was observed in severe COVID-19 inpatients with DVT or those deceased during hospital stay. New-onset DVT partially mediated the association between baseline D-dimer (indirect effect: 0.011, estimated mediating proportion: 67.0%), baseline ANC (indirect effect: 0.006, estimated mediating proportion: 48.7%), and mortality in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In summary, baseline D-dimer and baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) levels were associated with the mortality in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19, especially DVT inpatients. New-onset DVT partially mediated the association between baseline D-dimer, baseline ANC, and mortality in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a therapeutic option for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT); however, its benefit over conservative medical management has not been proven. Whether the current patient selection practices are appropriate for EVT is unclear., Methods: This was a nationwide study of the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample database. Adult CVT patients and EVT treatments were identified. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, CVT risk factors, and CVT manifestations were identified. Presence of radiographic signs of advanced and severe CVT (venous infarction, cerebral edema, and intracranial hemorrhage) was recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes were good discharge outcomes and in-hospital mortality, respectively., Results: A total of 17,130 CVT patients were identified, and 56.7% had good discharge outcomes, while 4.6% died during hospitalization. 945 (5.5%) received EVT, and EVT patients were more likely to have cerebral infarction (35.4 vs. 21.8%, p &lt; 0.001), edema (35.4 vs. 20.1%, p &lt; 0.001), and hemorrhage (37.6 vs. 19.7%, p &lt; 0.001). After multivariable adjustments, EVT for patients without infarction, edema, or hemorrhage was moderately associated with higher odds of good outcomes (OR 1.86 [95% CI 0.98-3.53], p = 0.059) and resulted in zero deaths. However, with the increasing burden of radiographic signs of advanced CVT measured by the cumulative presence of infarction, edema, and hemorrhage, EVT was associated with decreasing odds of good outcomes and increasing odds of in-hospital mortality compared to medical management (interaction p = 0.046 and 0.029, respectively)., Conclusions: EVT may lead to higher rates of favorable hospitalization outcomes in patients who have not yet developed overt parenchymal manifestations of backpressure changes; presence of infarction, edema, and hemorrhage may diminish the short-term effectiveness of EVT., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Gynecologic cancer is a significant public health concern worldwide, with three of the top ten most common cancers affecting women. The increasing incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the disproportionately poor outcomes in cancer patients necessitates urgent intervention. This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting the survivability of cancer patients with DVT, especially among gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancers., Methods: An ambispective cohort study was conducted among gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancer patients with DVT, from January 2011 until August 2013. All subjects were observed for three months. The presence of DVT was confirmed using Doppler ultrasound. The analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The statistical significance was determined using the log-rank/Mantel-Cox test., Results: Among 223 cancer subjects with DVT, 61.4% of the subjects developed short-term mortality. In the overall group, the survival time was significantly lower in subjects who developed immobilization status (p-value <0.001), advanced cancer stages (p-value <0.045), and infection status (p-value <0.001). In the gynecologic cancer group, the survival time was significantly lower in subjects who developed immobilization (p-value 0.007) and infection status (p-value 0.021). In the non-gynecologic cancer group, the survival time was significantly lower in subjects who developed immobilization (p-value 0.008), infection (p-value 0.002), undergo cancer surgery (p-value 0.024), and received high-risk systemic therapy (p-value 0.048). Additionally, the most common infection was pneumonia (29.6%)., Conclusions: Both gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancer patients who experienced DVT developed a high short-term mortality. Our finding of immobility, infection, advanced cancer stages, systemic therapy, and cancer surgery as risk factors that affect the survivability highlights the necessity of administering secondary prophylaxis as a standard procedure in clinical practice., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2023 Rachman A et al.)

Background: The aim of our study was to assess how often deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurs bilaterally and if this has an impact on the recurrence rate of thromboembolic disease and on the occurrence of malignant tumors. Additionally, the occurrence of pulmonary embolism and mortality of patients was assessed. Patients and methods: For this observational study, we retrospectively screened all patient's records for DVT, investigated between 2000 and 2017. 2409 patients with the diagnosis of DVT were found. The patients aged between 18 and 89 years old in 2017, received a follow-up questionnaire, asking for thromboembolic recurrence, malignant tumors and pulmonary embolism. 755 patients were included in the follow-up cohort (604 with unilateral, 151 with bilateral DVT). We performed nonparametric tests to assess two group analysis. Results: Bilateral DVT occurred in 19% of the patients in this cohort. Patients with bilateral DVT develop significantly more often cancer, either at the time of diagnosis or in the follow up, compared to patients with unilateral DVT (22.5% vs. 15.4%, p=0.036). They also endure significantly more often pulmonary embolism simultaneously (33.8% vs. 20.8%, p<0.001). Patients with bilateral DVT were significantly older (median 69 years) than patients with unilateral DVT (median 63 years, p<0.001). In addition, patients with bilateral DVT show a higher mortality (9.1% vs. 5.2%, p=0.002), a higher recurrence rate could not be observed. Conclusions: Bilateral DVT is more common than published so far. Patients with bilateral DVT suffer more often from malignant tumors, and are more often diagnosed with pulmonary embolism. The patients with bilateral DVT are older and have a higher mortality. Further investigations should address the issue of recurrent thromboembolic disease in a prospective cohort study.

Purpose: Trauma patients are at high risk of VTE. We summarize the efficacy and safety of LMWH versus UFH for the prevention of VTE in trauma patients., Methods: We searched 6 databases from inception through March 12, 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing LMWH versus UFH for thromboprophylaxis in adult trauma patients. We pooled effect estimates across RCTs and observational studies separately, using random-effects model and inverse variance weighting. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool for RCTs and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies (ROBINS)-I tool for observational studies and assessed certainty of findings using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology., Results: We included 4 RCTs (879 patients) and 8 observational studies (306,747 patients). Based on pooled RCT data, compared to UFH, LMWH reduces deep vein thrombosis (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, moderate certainty) and VTE (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90, moderate certainty). As compared to UFH, LMWH may reduce pulmonary embolism [adjusted odds ratio from pooled observational studies 0.56 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.62)] and mortality (adjusted odds ratio from pooled observational studies 0.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.65), though based on low certainty evidence. There was an uncertain effect on adverse events (RR from pooled RCTs 0.80, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.33, very low certainty) and heparin induced thrombocytopenia [RR from pooled RCTs 0.26 (95% CI 0.03 to 2.38, very low certainty)]., Conclusions: Among adult trauma patients, LMWH is superior to UFH for deep vein thrombosis and VTE prevention and may additionally reduce pulmonary embolism and mortality. The impact on adverse events and heparin induced thrombocytopenia is uncertain., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), venous drainage of the anterior sector is usually reconstructed on the bench to form a neo-middle hepatic vein (MHV). Reconstruction of the MHV for drainage of the anterior sector is crucial for optimal graft function. The conduits used for reconstruction include cryopreserved allografts, synthetic grafts, or the recipient portal vein. However, the ideal choice remains a matter of debate. This study compares the efficacy of the native recipient portal vein (RPV) with PTFE grafts for reconstruction of the neo-MHV., Methods: Patients in this equivalence-controlled, parallel-group trial were randomized to either RPV (62 patients) or PTFE (60 patients) for use in the reconstruction of the neo-MHV. Primary endpoint was neo-MHV patency at 14 days and 90 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and post-transplant parameters as scored by predefined scoring systems., Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of neo-MHV thrombosis at 14 days (RPV 6.5 per cent versus PTFE 10 per cent; P = 0.701) and 90 days (RPV 14.5 per cent versus PTFE 18.3 per cent; P = 0.745) between the two groups. Irrespective of the type of graft used for reconstruction, 90-day all-cause and sepsis-specific mortality was significantly higher among patients who developed neo-MHV thrombosis. Neo-MHV thrombosis and sepsis were identified as risk factors for mortality on Cox proportional hazards analysis. No harms or unintended side effects were observed in either group., Conclusion: In adult LDLT using modified right lobe graft, use of either PTFE or RPV for neo-MHV reconstruction resulted in similar early patency rates. Irrespective of the type of conduit used for reconstruction, neo-MHV thrombosis is a significant risk factor for mortality., Registration Number: CTRI/2018/11/016315 (www.ctri.nic.in)., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The prognostic significance of concomitant superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) in patients with lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not been consistently evaluated., Methods: We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry to compare the rates of subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent DVT, major bleeding or death in patients with lower-limb DVT, according to the presence or absence of concomitant SVT., Results: From March 2015 to May 2020, there were 8,743 patients with lower-limb DVT. Of these, 745 (8.5%) had concomitant SVT. Most patients (97.4% in both subgroups) received anticoagulant therapy (median duration: 138 vs. 147 days). During follow-up (median: 193 vs. 210 days), 156 (1.8%) patients developed subsequent PE, 336 (3.8%) had recurrent DVT, 201 (2.3%) had major bleeding and 844 (9.7%) died. Patients with concomitant SVT had a higher rate of subsequent PE (rate ratio [RR]: 2.11; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.33-3.24) than those with isolated DVT, with no significant differences in the rates of recurrent DVT (RR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.50-1.21), major bleeding (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.41-1.33) or death (RR: 0.81; 95%CI: 0.61-1.06). On multivariable analysis, patients with DVT and SVT concomitantly were at increased risk of subsequent PE during anticoagulation (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.23; 95%CI: 1.22-4.05) and also during the entire follow-up period (adjusted HR: 2.33; 95%CI: 1.49-3.66)., Conclusion: Patients with lower-limb DVT and SVT concomitantly are at increased risk of developing PE. Further studies are needed to externally validate our findings and to determine if these patients could benefit from a different management strategy., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with high mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but there remains uncertainty about the benefit of anti-coagulation prophylaxis and how to decide when ultrasound screening is indicated. We aimed to determine parameters predicting which COVID-19 patients are at risk of DVT and to assess the benefit of prophylactic anti-coagulation.Adult hospitalized patients with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) undergoing venous duplex ultrasound for DVT assessment (n = 451) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and laboratory data within 72 hours of ultrasound were collected. Using split sampling and a 10-fold cross-validation, a random forest model was developed to find the most important variables for predicting DVT. Different d-dimer cutoffs were examined for classification of DVT. We also compared the rate of DVT between the patients going and not going under thromboprophylaxis.DVT was found in 65 (14%) of 451 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction positive patients. The random forest model, trained and cross-validated on 2/3 of the original sample (n = 301), had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.97) for prediction of DVT in the test set (n = 150), with sensitivity = 93% (95%CI: 68%-99%) and specificity = 82% (95%CI: 75%-88%). The following variables had the highest importance: d-dimer, thromboprophylaxis, systolic blood pressure, admission to ultrasound interval, and platelets. Thromboprophylaxis reduced DVT risk 4-fold from 26% to 6% (P < .001), while anti-coagulation therapy led to hemorrhagic complications in 14 (22%) of 65 patients with DVT including 2 fatal intra-cranial hemorrhages. D-dimer was the most important predictor with area under curve = 0.79 (95%CI: 0.73-0.86) by itself, and a 5000 ng/mL threshold at 7 days postCOVID-19 symptom onset had 75% (95%CI: 53%-90%) sensitivity and 81% (95%CI: 72%-88%) specificity. In comparison with d-dimer alone, the random forest model showed 68% versus 32% specificity at 95% sensitivity, and 44% versus 23% sensitivity at 95% specificity.D-dimer >5000 ng/mL predicts DVT with high accuracy suggesting regular monitoring with d-dimer in the early stages of COVID-19 may be useful. A random forest model improved the prediction of DVT. Thromboprophylaxis reduced DVT in COVID-19 patients and should be considered in all patients. Full anti-coagulation therapy has a risk of life-threatening hemorrhage., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: There is currently no widely-accepted consensus for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous brachytherapy with iodine-125 seeds for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein-branch tumor thrombus (PVBTT)., Methods: Sixty-nine hepatocellular carcinoma patients with PVBTT were enrolled; 34 received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with iodine-125 seeds implanted in the PVBTT; 35 were treated with TACE alone. Adverse events, objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were compared between the two groups. Tumor responses of PVBTT and intrahepatic tumor were correlated. Multivariate and subgroup analyses were conducted for overall survival., Results: No grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded, and there was no difference in grade 1 or 2 adverse events between the two groups. Objective response rate and disease control rate for PVBTT were 58.9 and 91.2%, respectively, in the combined treatment group, which were significantly greater than the 5.7 and 54.3% rates, respectively, in the TACE-alone group (both p's ≤ 0.001). Intrahepatic tumor response was positively correlated with the PVBTT response (γ = 0.782, p < 0.01). Survival outcomes were better in the combined treatment group than in the TACE-alone group: the median progression-free survival for PVBTT was 9 months versus 3 months (HR = 0.187 [95% CI: 0.101, 0.345], p < 0.001), and the median overall survival was 11 months versus 7 months (HR = 0.448 [95% CI: 0.265, 0.758], p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that application of brachytherapy and lower grade PVBTT (Vp1 + Vp2 vs. Vp3) were protective predictors of overall survival. In stratified analysis, the benefit of overall survival was more significant in the subgroup of PVBTT Vp1 + Vp2 rather than in Vp3., Conclusions: The combination of iodine-125 seed brachytherapy guided by ultrasound and TACE is a convenient, safe, and effective treatment for patients with HCC and PVBTT, conferring a better survival benefit than TACE alone., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: We have summarized the incidence, anticoagulation panels, laboratory characteristics, and mortality of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)., Methods: After systematically searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 retrospective, 6 prospective observational, and 2 cross-sectional studies was performed according to the guidelines of the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement., Results: Overall, 4382 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included. Men accounted for significantly more patients than did women (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-2.02; P < .001). The total incidence of VTE among the patients with COVID-19 was 28.3% (95% CI, 21.6%-35.4%), with an incidence of 38.0% (95% CI, 29.1%-47.4%) and 17.2% (95% CI, 11.4%-23.8%) among those with severe and general COVID-19, respectively. The total incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities was 18.3% (95% CI, 10.8%-27.2%). The incidence of DVT was 22.1% (95% CI, 11.0%-35.5%) and 12.8% (95% CI, 5.0%-23.3%) in those with severe and general COVID-19, respectively. The total incidence of pulmonary embolism was 17.6% (95% CI, 12.3%-23.5%), with a rate of 21.7% (95% CI, 14.8%-29.3%) in severe cases and 12.5% (95% CI, 6.1%-23.5%) in general cases. When COVID-19 severity was unclassified, the mortality for the patients with VTE was not significantly greater (25.2%; 95% CI, 12.2%-40.5%) than that for those without VTE (10.2%; 95% CI, 3.4%-19.5%; OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.46-7.64; P = .377). However, among the patients with severe COVID-19, those who had developed VTE had significantly greater mortality compared with those without VTE (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.15-3.53; P = .014). The patients with COVID-19 and VTE had significantly higher D-dimer levels than did similar patients without VTE in multiple studies., Conclusions: The occurrence of VTE, DVT, and pulmonary embolism has been substantial among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, especially among those with severe COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 and VTE had significantly greater mortality compared with similar patients without VTE. An increased D-dimer level might be an indicator of the occurrence of VTE in patients with COVID-19., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HESs) are a rare group of disorders that result in overproduction of eosinophils, leading to tissue damage. Thrombotic complications in HES and associated risk factors in this patient population have not been extensively studied., Objective: To investigate the rates of and risk factors associated with thrombotic events in patients with HES, including markers of clonal hematopoiesis as evidenced by molecular aberrations on next-generation sequencing., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients seen at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020. Patients who had hypereosinophilia with an absolute eosinophil count of 1500 cells/μL or greater on 2 separate occasions at least 1 month apart and who underwent genetic or molecular testing as part of their work-up were included. Patients with secondary eosinophilia were excluded., Main Outcomes and Measures: Symptomatic and asymptomatic arterial and venous thrombotic events after the diagnosis of HES and all-cause death., Results: A total of 71 patients (median age, 58 years [interquartile range (IQR), 43-67 years]; 36 women [51%]; 57 White patients [80%]) were included. Patients had a median follow-up time of 29 months (IQR, 19-49 months). Seventeen patients (24%) had 1 or more thrombotic events, including 11 venous thromboembolic events and 11 arterial thrombotic events (8 patients had ≥1 event and 3 patients had recurrent events). Patients with 1 or more thrombotic events had a higher median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (median, 1 [IQR, 1-2] vs 0 [IQR, 0-1]; P = .002), had more frequent cardiac involvement (7 of 17 events [41%] vs 6 of 54 events [11%]; P = .01), more frequently received treatment (17 of 17 events [100%] vs 40 of 54 events [74%]; P = .02), and had more molecular aberrations on next-generation sequencing (12 of 17 [71%] vs 12 of 54 [26%]; P = .003) vs patients without thrombosis. After multivariable analysis, the presence of molecular aberration was associated with increased odds of thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.1-27.7). Death occurred more frequently in patients with thrombotic events compared with those without (6 of 17 [35%] vs 2 of 54 [4%]; P = .002) and in patients with molecular aberrations compared with those without (6 of 24 [25%] vs 1 of 40 [3%]; P = .009), although only thrombotic events were significantly associated with increased odds of death after multivariable analysis., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, thrombosis was common in patients with HES and was significantly associated with increased risk of death.

Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism events (VTE). This study performed a systematic review in PubMed/EMBASE of studies reporting the prevalence of VTE in patients with COVID-19 who were totally screened/assessed for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or for pulmonary embolism (PE). Among 47 candidate studies ( n = 6459; 33 in Europe), 17 studies ( n = 3973; weighted age 63.0 years, males 60%, intensive care unit (ICU) 16%) reported the prevalence of PE with a pooled estimate of 32% (95% CI: 25, 40%), and 32 studies ( n = 2552; weighted age 62.6 years, males 57%, ICU 49%) reported the prevalence of DVT with a pooled estimate of 27% (95% CI: 21, 34%). A total of 36 studies reported the use of at least prophylactic antithrombotic treatment in the majority of their patients. Meta-regression analysis showed that the prevalence of VTE was higher across studies with a higher percentage of ICU patients and higher study population mean D-dimer values, and lower in studies with mixed dosing of anticoagulation in ⩾ 50% of the population compared to studies with standard prophylactic dosing of anticoagulation in < 50% of the population. The pooled odds ratio for death in patients with COVID-19 and VTE versus those without VTE (17 studies, n = 2882) was 2.1 (95% CI: 1.2, 3.6). Hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 are at high VTE risk despite prophylactic anticoagulation. Further research should investigate the individualized VTE risk of patients with COVID-19 and the optimal preventive antithrombotic therapy. PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42020185543.

The outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19) has deeply challenged the world population, but also our medical knowledge. Special attention has been paid early to an activation of coagulation, then to an elevated rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. These data suggested that anticoagulant drugs should be evaluated in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. The publication of unexpected high rates of VTE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, despite receiving thromboprophylaxis, open the way to dedicated trials, evaluating modified regimens of thromboprophylaxis. Moreover, the further improvement in our comprehension of the disease, particularly the pulmonary endothelial dysfunction increased the hope that anticoagulant drugs may also protect patients from pulmonary thrombosis. In this comprehensive review, we cover the different situations where thromboprophylaxis standard may be modified (medically-ill inpatients, ICU inpatients, outpatients), and describe some of the current randomized controls trials evaluating new regimens of thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19, including the preliminary available results. We also discuss the potential of anticoagulant drugs to target the thromboinflammation described in patients with severe COVID-19., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is one of the most common complications of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which refers to the advanced stage of HCC and indicates an extremely poor prognosis. Monotherapy cannot effectively prolong the survival benefit of patients with HCC-PVTT characterized by a high recurrence rate. With great progress in the area of immune and molecular targeted therapy, there comes a promising era of multidisciplinary management of HCC. Survival benefits can be achieved based on accurate diagnosis, staging, and multidisciplinary management. Additionally, in terms of the presence of controversy about the standard treatment algorithm and the absence of universal treatment guidelines, a multidisciplinary management program may afford the best hope for HCC-PVTT patients via appropriate implement of various treatment protocols.

Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common among the severely injured and may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE), which can be life threatening. Thromboprophylaxis may reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE); it does not guarantee complete protection. This study's primary aim was to determine the incidence and nature of lower-limb DVT in polytrauma patients taking prophylaxis. The secondary objective was to assess the incidence of DVT-related complications, including the development of PE and death., Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study included patients age 18 years or older who presented with polytrauma directly from the scene and were admitted into the trauma unit between March 1, 2020 and August 31, 2020. All patients underwent lower-limb ultrasound during their hospital course to diagnose DVT., Results: A total of 169 patients underwent extremity Doppler ultrasound to detect DVT. Of these, 69 patients (40.8%) were considered at the highest-risk for VTE development. For VTE prophylaxis, 115 patients (68%) received pharmacologic agents, and 54 patients (32%) had intermittent pneumatic compression on admission. Three patients (1.8%) developed DVT despite prophylaxis. Four patients (2.4%) developed PE during the index presentation and were diagnosed between days 3 and 13 after injury. Early DVT was not detected in any patients with diagnosed PE. Overall, nine patients (5.33%) died, but no in-hospital deaths were related to DVT and/or PE., Conclusion: The incidence of DVT in polytrauma patients remains low in our small series, perhaps because of the mandatory VTE risk assessment for all hospitalized patients and the early initiation of prophylaxis. Using a trauma center registry to measure DVT and PE incidence regularly is recommended to improve trauma care quality., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this work., (© 2021 Chowdhury et al.)

Abstract: Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens (PCD) is a severe and rare form of venous thrombosis of the lower extremities, caused by a subtotal or complete occlusion of venous outflow by a thrombus. PCD should be considered a real medical emergency; complications include necrosis and gangrene of the affected limb, amputation, massive pulmonary embolism and, in extreme cases, the death of the patient. Case Report. A 63-years-old man was admitted to the Emergency room with localized pain on the right calf, hyperthermia, cold sweating and vomiting episodes. Five days prior he developed flu-like symptoms, joint pain and cold sensation unresponsive to treatment. Ultrasound examination showed a deep venous thrombosis of the lower right limb with partial occlusion of common iliac and femoral veins. The patient was treated with low molecular weight heparin given twice daily. He began to develop severe hypotension and metabolic acidosis, with tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Despite the treatment, there was no improvement and he developed severe sinus node dysfunction. He failed to respond to all resuscitative efforts and died. Family members complained Authority, assuming it was a medical error. The clinical-forensic investigation is essential to determine the causes and manner of death and to assess medical responsibility and liability.

Background: Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains a poor prognostic factor occurring in about 10%-40% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for the optimal treatment is controversial. Anlotinib is an novel small molecule inhibitor that has a broad spectrum of inhibitory activities on tumor angiogenesis and growth. However, so far, no studies have reported the use of anlotinib in the treatment of HCC patients with PVTT. Here, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of anlotinib, followed by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of patients with HCC and PVTT., Materials and Methods: A total of 145 consecutive HCC patients who underwent TACE in combination with RFA were enrolled in the retrospective study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with PVTT and received anlotinib as basic treatment. The adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs Version 4.0. Time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: The most common toxicities related to anlotinib were pharyngalgia (53.6%), fatigue (42.9%), and hand-foot skin reaction (39.3%). The median OS was 13 months (range: 3-18 months) with 1-year OS rate of 64.3%. The median TTP was 7 months (range: 1-12 months) with 6-month rate of 46.4%., Conclusion: Anlotinib followed by TACE and RFA is a safe and effective initial treatment modality for HCC patients with PVTT. Anlotinib may be a promising therapeutic option for relieving and/or stabilizing HCC with PVTT., Competing Interests: None

Background: We evaluated the treatment response and predictive factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT), who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Additionally, we developed and validated a personalised prediction model for patient survival., Methods: Clinical information was retrospectively collected for 80 patients with HCC and PVTT, who were treated with SBRT at the Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) between December 2015 and June 2019. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify the independent predictive factors for survival. Clinical factors were subsequently presented in a nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the model and the net clinical benefit., Results: All patients completed the planned radiotherapy treatment, and the median follow-up duration was 10 months (range, 1-35.3 months). The median survival duration was 11.5 months, with 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival rates of 92.5, 74.5, and 47.5%, respectively. The multivariable Cox regression model indicated that the following were significant independent predictors of OS: clinical T stage (p = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.085, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.514-6.286), cirrhosis (p = 0.014, HR = 2.988, 95% CI: 1.246-7.168), age (p = 0.005, HR = 1.043, 95% CI: 1.013-1.075), alpha-fetoprotein level (p = 0.022, HR = 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000-1.000), and haemoglobin level (p = 0.008, HR = 0.979, 95% CI: 0.963-0.994). A nomogram based on five independent risk factors and DCA demonstrated a favourable predictive accuracy of patient survival (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.85) and the clinical usefulness of the model., Conclusions: SBRT is an effective treatment for patients with HCC with PVTT. Notably, clinical T stage, presence of cirrhosis, age, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and haemoglobin levels are independent prognostic factors for survival. The presented nomogram can be used to predict the survival of patients with HCC and PVTT, who underwent SBRT.

Aim: Stereotactic-body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we report on our experience of treating PVTT using SBRT in patients with concomitant underlying chronic liver disease., Methods: This study included 24 patients. The initial prescription dose was 45 Gy in three fractions in 17 (70.8%) patients, but it was modified in the remaining seven (29.2%) patients, with the dose ranging from 39 to 42 Gy in 3-4 fractions. After SBRT, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed in 16 (66.7%) patients., Results: Of the 24 patients, 2 (8.3%) showed complete response, while 11 (45.8%) showed partial response. After a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range: 2.6-56.5 months), the 1-year overall survival (OS) and the median survival were 67.5% and 20.8 months, respectively. Both combined SBRT and TACE and grade ≥3 hepatic toxicity affected the 1-year OS (SBRT alone vs SBRT + TACE: 14.6% vs 71.4%, P < .001; presence of hepatic toxicity vs absence: 0% vs 81.1%, P = .002)., Conclusions: Overall, SBRT, especially in combination with TACE, is an effective treatment for patients with HCC and PVTT. An optimal dose schedule must be followed to reduce hepatic toxicity while maintaining tumor response., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: Venous sinus thrombosis (VST) is a rare entity in pediatrics, probably under-diagnosed and poten tially serious, described as a cause of stroke in childhood., Objective: To describe the clinical presenta tion, risk factors, treatment, and evolution of pediatric patients with VST., Patients and Method: Re trospective study of patients admitted to a referral hospital, diagnosed with VST, aged between one month and seventeen years, from January 2011 to December 2019. The following data were re viewed: age at diagnosis, sex, signs and symptoms of presentation, predisposing mechanisms, study of thrombophilias, treatment and duration of treatment, follow-up protocol, long-term sequelae, and mortality. Due to their differences in clinical presentation, the sample was divided into two age groups: young children between 1 month and 5 years and older children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years., Results: 17 patients were diagnosed with VST, 45% were women, with a median age of 4.5 years. The most frequent symptoms in older children (6-17 years old) were headache (80%) and diplopia (60%). In children under 5 years old, the most frequent clinical presentation was cerebellar ataxia (42%), asymptomatic (34%), and headache (25%). In 23.5% of the total, VST was a casual fin ding in neuroimaging. 13 patients presented relevant histories such as complicated otitis media with mastoiditis (53%), severe traumatic head injury (6%), and resection of a space-occupying lesion of the brain (6%). 23% of the cases were idiopathic and in 23% there were prothrombotic factors. The treatment of choice in all patients was low-molecular-weight heparin. During the short-term follow- up, 11.8% presented self-limited neurological symptoms. One patient presented long-term paresis of the sixth paired cranial nerve. There were no deaths or recurrences of the episode in our series., Conclusions: VST is a rare entity and it usually appears with signs and symptoms of intracranial hy pertension. It is a potentially serious condition and early diagnosis and treatment can help minimize long-term sequelae.

Background: The clinical epidemiology of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in Sub-Saharan Africa is unknown. Such information may be relevant for service planning, prevention and for adapting existing CVT management guidelines to that zone of the World., Aims: Systematic review to describe the demography, associated conditions, clinical and neuroimaging features, treatment and outcome of CVT in Sub-Saharan Africa., Summary of Review: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, clinicaltrials.gov and reference lists of included studies for studies reporting original data on CVT in sub-Saharan Africa. We included 20 observational studies describing 287 CVT patients, 11 case reports (13 patients) and 9 case series (274 patients). All studies had a high risk of bias. In case series 58.6 % of the patients were female, the most common associated condition was infection (63.1%), followed by oral contraceptives (7.3%), pregnancy/puerperium (6.2 %), and prothrombotic conditions (2.2%). CT was the most common method to diagnose CVT (85%). Ninety-nine percent (101/102) of patients reported in case series after the year 2000 were anticoagulated. In case series, 21/210 with information (10 %) patients died in the acute phase, while 60/129 with information (46.5%) recovered without sequels., Conclusions: The low number of reported CVT cases from Sub-Saharan Africa suggests that CVT is either infrequent, not diagnosed or not reported. Infection is the most common risk factor. Most CVT cases were confirmed by CT alone. Almost all patients reported after year 2000 received anticoagulation. Death rate was higher than in high income countries., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is strong evidence that portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is associated with poor survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, data regarding the clinical significance of hepatic vein tumor thrombosis (HVTT) is rare, particularly in Western patients., Objective: To determine the HVTT prevalence in a Western patient population and its impact on survival., Methods: We included 1310 patients with HCC treated in our tertiary referral center between January 2005 and December 2016. HVTT and PVTT were diagnosed with contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging. Overall survival (OS) was calculated starting from the initial HCC diagnosis, and in a second step, starting from the first appearance of vascular invasion., Results: We observed macrovascular invasion (MVI) in 519 patients who suffered from either isolated HVTT (n = 40), isolated PVTT (n = 352), or both combined (HVTT + PVTT) (n = 127). Calculated from the initial HCC diagnosis, the median OS for patients with isolated HVTT was significantly shorter than that of patients without MVI (13.3 vs. 32.5 months, p < 0.001). Calculated from the first appearance of MVI, the median OS was similar among patients with isolated HVTT (6.5 months), isolated PVTT (5 months), and HVTT + PVTT (5 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed HVTT as an independent risk factor for poor survival., Conclusions: HVTT may be more common than typically reported. In most patients, it was accompanied by PVTT. Isolated HVTT occurred less frequently and later than isolated PVTT; however, once developed, it had the same deleterious impact on survival. Therefore, patients with HVTT should be classified as advanced stage of HCC., (© 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Competing Interests: None declared.

Background:  Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of COVID-19, so that the importance of adequate in-hospital thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is well established. However, the incidence of VTE after discharge and whether postdischarge thromboprophylaxis is beneficial and safe are unclear. In this prospective observational single-center study, we report the incidence of VTE 6 weeks after hospitalization and the use of postdischarge thromboprophylaxis., Methods:  Patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 were invited to a multidisciplinary follow-up clinic 6 weeks after discharge. D-dimer and C-reactive protein were measured, and all patients were screened for deep vein thrombosis with venous duplex-ultrasound. Additionally, selected high-risk patients received computed tomography pulmonary angiogram or ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan to screen for incidental pulmonary embolism., Results:  Of 485 consecutive patients hospitalized from March through June 2020, 146 patients were analyzed, of which 39% had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Postdischarge thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 28% of patients, but was used more frequently after ICU stay (61%) and in patients with higher maximal D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels during hospitalization. Six weeks after discharge, elevated D-dimer values were present in 32% of ward and 42% of ICU patients. Only one asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (0.7%) and one symptomatic pulmonary embolism (0.7%) were diagnosed with systematic screening. No bleedings were reported., Conclusion:  In patients who had been hospitalized with COVID-19, systematic screening for VTE 6 weeks after discharge revealed a low incidence of VTE. A strategy of selectively providing postdischarge thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients seems safe and potentially effective., Competing Interests: J.W. reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer, MSD, Gilead, outside the submitted work. C.V. reports grants from Belgian Fund for Cardiothoracic Surgery, grants from Abiomed, outside the submitted work. T.V. reports personal fees from Bayer AG, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from BMS/Pfizer, personal fees from Leo Pharma, personal fees from Sanofi Aventis, outside the submitted work. R.V. reports grants from Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), outside the submitted work. P.V. reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Nordic Pharma, grants and personal fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work. M.J. reports grants from Bayer, grants from Takeda, grants from Instrumentation Laboratory, grants from Thrombogenics, outside the submitted work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is a frequent complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which leads to classification as advanced stage disease (regardless of the degree of PVTT) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification. For such patients, systemic therapy is the standard of care. However, in clinical reality, many patients with PVTT undergo different treatments, such as resection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), or best supportive care (BSC). Here we examined whether patients benefited from such alternative therapies, according to the extent of PVTT., Methods: This analysis included therapy-naïve patients with HCC and PVTT treated between January 2005 and December 2016. PVTT was classified according to the Liver Cancer study group of Japan as follows: Vp1 = segmental PV invasion; Vp2 = right anterior or posterior PV; Vp3 = right or left PV; Vp4 = main trunk. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed for each treatment subgroup considering the extent of PVTT. We performed Cox regression analysis with adjustment for possible confounders. To further attenuate selection bias, we applied propensity score weighting using the inverse probability of treatment weights., Results: A total of 278 treatment-naïve patients with HCC and PVTT were included for analysis. The median observed OS in months for each treatment modality (resection, TACE/SIRT, sorafenib, BSC, respectively) was 32.4, 8.1, N/A, and 1.7 for Vp1; 10.7, 6.9, 5.5, and 1.2 for Vp2; 6.6, 7.5, 2.9, and 0.6 for Vp3; and 8.0, 3.6, 5.3, and 0.7 for Vp4. Thus, the median OS in the resection group in case of segmental PVTT (Vp1) was significantly longer compared to any other treatment group (all p values <0.01)., Conclusions: Treatment strategy for HCC with PVTT should not be limited to systemic therapy in general. The extent of PVTT should be considered when deciding on treatment alternatives. In patients with segmental PVTT (Vp1), resection should be evaluated., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Objective: To compare outcomes among patients with calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT) stratified by management strategy because distal or calf DVT is said to have low rates of propagation, embolization, and recurrence and, as such, guideline recommendations include provisions for serial imaging without treatment., Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with ultrasound-confirmed acute DVT involving the calf veins (January 1, 2016, to August 1, 2018) were identified by scrutinizing the Gonda Vascular Center Ultrasound database. Patients were segregated into 2 categories depending on management strategy; anticoagulation vs serial surveillance ultrasound without anticoagulation. Outcomes including venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, bleeding, death, and net clinical benefit were compared by treatment strategy., Results: There were 483 patients with calf DVT identified; 399 were treated with anticoagulation therapy and 84 were managed with surveillance ultrasound. Patients in the surveillance group were older (70.0±13.9 vs 63.0±14.9 years; P<.001) and more likely to have had a recent hospitalization (76.2% [64/84] vs 45.4% [181/399]; P<.001). Common reasons for choosing ultrasound surveillance included guideline prescriptive (58.3% [49/84]), active bleeding (21.4% [18/84]), and recent surgery (17.9% [15/84]). The VTE recurrence composite was lower for patients treated with anticoagulants (7.3% [29/399]) compared with surveillance (14.3% [12/84]; P=.04). The DVT propagation was less frequent in the treated group (2.8% [11/399] vs 8.3% [7/84]; P=.01). There was no difference in bleeding or mortality outcomes by management strategy. Net clinical benefit (VTE recurrence plus major bleeding) favored anticoagulant therapy (9.8% [39/399] vs 20.2% [17/84]; P<.01)., Conclusion: Patients with calf DVT treated with anticoagulants had significantly better outcomes compared with those managed by a strategy of serial ultrasound surveillance without increasing bleeding outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a major cause of mortality in cancer patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with multiple side effects including CAT. The aim of this study is to investigate risk factors and prognostic impact associated with CAT events during ICIs treatment., Methods: This is a multi-center retrospective study that included stage IV cancer patients treated with ICIs., Results: We identified 552 cancer patients treated with ICIs. During follow-up time, 58 (10.5%) patients developed 67 venous thromboembolism (VTE) events while on ICIs. Anticoagulation use at the time of ICIs treatment start was associated with significantly higher VTE incidence rate (IRR: 2.23). No significant difference in VTE IRR was observed depending on response to ICIs treatment, aspirin use, or Khorana VTE risk score. Melanoma as primary cancer, Khorana score, ECOG status, and anemia at baseline were able to predict mortality., Conclusions: The incidence of CAT in stage-IV cancer patients treated with ICIs was higher in our study compared to previous reports. Control group of patients who did not receive ICIs is needed for better identification of CAT risk factors. Khorana score was a good predictor of mortality but not CAT risk and needs to be further validated in a homogenous group of patients., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S . Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are often used. However, no clear consensus has been reached regarding the benefits and risks from randomized, controlled trials. Therefore, we investigated benefits and risks of IVC filter use., Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to October 31, 2019 to identify randomized, controlled trials for inclusion in our meta-analysis. The primary outcome was mortality related to pulmonary embolism (PE). The secondary outcomes were overall mortality, PE, deep vein thrombosis, and major bleeding. Risk ratios were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method with the fixed effects model for low heterogeneity. Otherwise, the random effects model was used. Risk differences were considered candidates of effect size if some of the data could not be pooled in the calculations., Results: Seven articles with 1274 patients were included. We found no significant difference in mortality related to PE between the IVC filter and control groups within 3 months (risk difference, -0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.00; P = .11) nor during the entire follow-up period with low heterogeneity (I 2  = 0%). The new occurrence of PE within 3 months and during the whole follow-up period was lower in the IVC filter group than in the control group (0.81% vs 5.98%; risk ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.65; P = .01; and 3.2% vs 7.79%; risk ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.71; P = .001, respectively). No significant differences were found in the rates of the new occurrence of deep vein thrombosis, major bleeding, and mortality during the whole follow-up period between the two groups (P > .05)., Conclusions: We found insufficient evidence to conclude that the use of IVC filters can reduce mortality. However, the use of IVC filters decreased the new occurrence of PE without increasing deep vein thrombosis or major bleeding., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has emerged as an important issue in patients with COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of VTE and mortality in COVID-19 patients initially presenting to a large health system. Our retrospective study included adult patients (excluding patients presenting with obstetric/gynecologic conditions) across a multihospital health system in the New York Metropolitan Region from March 1-April 27, 2020. VTE and mortality rates within 8 h of assessment were described. In 10,871 adults with COVID-19, 118 patients (1.09%) were diagnosed with symptomatic VTE (101 pulmonary embolism, 17 deep vein thrombosis events) and 28 patients (0.26%) died during initial assessment. Among these 146 patients, 64.4% were males, 56.8% were 60 years or older, 15.1% had a BMI > 35, and 11.6% were admitted to the intensive care unit. Comorbidities included hypertension (46.6%), diabetes (24.7%), hyperlipidemia (14.4%), chronic lung disease (12.3%), coronary artery disease (11.0%), and prior VTE (7.5%). Key medications included corticosteroids (22.6%), statins (21.2%), antiplatelets (20.6%), and anticoagulants (20.6%). Highest D-Dimer was greater than six times the upper limit of normal in 51.4%. Statin and antiplatelet use were associated with decreased VTE or mortality (each p < 0.01). In COVID-19 patients who initially presented to a large multihospital health system, the overall symptomatic VTE and mortality rate was over 1.0%. Statin and antiplatelet use were associated with decreased VTE or mortality. The potential benefits of antithrombotics in high risk COVID-19 patients during the pre-hospitalization period deserves study.

Importance: Thrombotic events are commonly reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Limited data exist to guide the intensity of antithrombotic prophylaxis., Objective: To evaluate the effects of intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design performed in 10 academic centers in Iran comparing intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (first hypothesis) and statin therapy vs matching placebo (second hypothesis; not reported in this article) among adult patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Patients were recruited between July 29, 2020, and November 19, 2020. The final follow-up date for the 30-day primary outcome was December 19, 2020., Interventions: Intermediate-dose (enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg daily) (n = 276) vs standard prophylactic anticoagulation (enoxaparin, 40 mg daily) (n = 286), with modification according to body weight and creatinine clearance. The assigned treatments were planned to be continued until completion of 30-day follow-up., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days, assessed in randomized patients who met the eligibility criteria and received at least 1 dose of the assigned treatment. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (type 3 or 5 definition), powered for noninferiority (a noninferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio), and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20 ×103/µL). All outcomes were blindly adjudicated., Results: Among 600 randomized patients, 562 (93.7%) were included in the primary analysis (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [50-71] years; 237 [42.2%] women). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 126 patients (45.7%) in the intermediate-dose group and 126 patients (44.1%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (absolute risk difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -6.6% to 9.8%]; odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.76-1.48]; P = .70). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (2.5%) in the intermediate-dose group and 4 patients (1.4%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (risk difference, 1.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.4%]; odds ratio, 1.83 [1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.00-5.93]), not meeting the noninferiority criteria (P for noninferiority >.99). Severe thrombocytopenia occurred only in patients assigned to the intermediate-dose group (6 vs 0 patients; risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, 0.4%-3.8%]; P = .01)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, did not result in a significant difference in the primary outcome of a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days. These results do not support the routine empirical use of intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation in unselected patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486508.

Background: Lemierre syndrome is characterized by head/neck vein thrombosis and septic embolism usually complicating an acute oropharyngeal bacterial infection in adolescents and young adults. We described the course of Lemierre syndrome in the contemporary era., Methods: In our individual-level analysis of 712 patients (2000-2017), we included cases described as Lemierre syndrome if these criteria were met: (i) primary site of bacterial infection in the head/neck; (ii) objectively confirmed local thrombotic complications or septic embolism. The study outcomes were new or recurrent venous thromboembolism or peripheral septic lesions, major bleeding, all-cause death and clinical sequelae., Results: The median age was 21 (Q1-Q3: 17-33) years, and 295 (41%) were female. At diagnosis, acute thrombosis of head/neck veins was detected in 597 (84%) patients, septic embolism in 582 (82%) and both in 468 (80%). After diagnosis and during in-hospital follow-up, new venous thromboembolism occurred in 34 (5.2%, 95% CI 3.8-7.2%) patients, new peripheral septic lesions became evident in 76 (11.7%; 9.4-14.3%). The rate of either was lower in patients who received anticoagulation (OR: 0.59; 0.36-0.94), higher in those with initial intracranial involvement (OR: 2.35; 1.45-3.80). Major bleeding occurred in 19 patients (2.9%; 1.9-4.5%), and 26 died (4.0%; 2.7-5.8%). Clinical sequelae were reported in 65 (10.4%, 8.2-13.0%) individuals, often consisting of cranial nerve palsy (n = 24) and orthopaedic limitations (n = 19)., Conclusions: Patients with Lemierre syndrome were characterized by a substantial risk of new thromboembolic complications and death. This risk was higher in the presence of initial intracranial involvement. One-tenth of survivors suffered major clinical sequelae., (© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Internal Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Publication of The Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Objective: Diffuse thrombosis represents one of the most predominant causes of death by COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to increase the risk of developing venous thromboembolic diseases (VTE). Aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between validated predictive scores for VTE such as IMPROVE and IMPROVEDD and: (1) Intensification of Care (IoC, admission to Pulmonology Department or Intensive Care Unit) (2) in-hospital mortality rate 3) 30-days mortality rate., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 51 adult patients with laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and calculated IMPROVE and IMPROVEDD scores. All patients underwent venous color-Doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs to assess the presence of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients with normal values of D-dimer did not receive heparin therapy (LMWH); patients with ≥ 4 ULN values of D-dimer or with a diagnosis of DVT were treated with therapeutic LMWH dosage, while the remaining patients were treated with prophylactic LMWH dosages., Results: We found strong relations between IMPROVE score and the need for IoC and with the in-hospital mortality rate and between the IMPROVEDD score and the need for IoC. We defined that an IMPROVE score greater than 4 points was significantly associated to in-hospital mortality rate (p = 0.05), while an IMPROVEDD score greater than 3 points was associated with the need for IoC (p = 0.04). Multivariate logistic analysis showed how IMPROVE score was significantly associated to in-hospital and 30-days mortality rates., Conclusions: IMPROVE score can be considered an independent predictor of in-hospital and 30-days mortality.

Background: Thrombosis and pulmonary embolism appear to be major causes of mortality in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, few studies have focused on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hospitalization for COVID-19., Methods: In this multi-center study, we followed 1529 COVID-19 patients for at least 45 days after hospital discharge, who underwent routine telephone follow-up. In case of signs or symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), they were invited for an in-hospital visit with a pulmonologist. The primary outcome was symptomatic VTE within 45 days of hospital discharge., Results: Of 1529 COVID-19 patients discharged from hospital, a total of 228 (14.9%) reported potential signs or symptoms of PE or DVT and were seen for an in-hospital visit. Of these, 13 and 12 received Doppler ultrasounds or pulmonary CT angiography, respectively, of whom only one patient was diagnosed with symptomatic PE. Of 51 (3.3%) patients who died after discharge, two deaths were attributed to VTE corresponding to a 45-day cumulative rate of symptomatic VTE of 0.2% (95%CI 0.1%-0.6%; n = 3). There was no evidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in these patients. Other deaths after hospital discharge included myocardial infarction (n = 13), heart failure (n = 9), and stroke (n = 9)., Conclusions: We did not observe a high rate of symptomatic VTE in COVID-19 patients after hospital discharge. Routine extended thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for COVID-19 may not have a net clinical benefit. Randomized trials may be warranted., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background Asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an end point frequently used to evaluate the efficacy of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. Recently, the clinical relevance of asymptomatic DVT has been challenged. Methods and Results The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between asymptomatic proximal DVT and all-cause mortality (ACM) using a cohort analysis of a randomized trial for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill medical patients. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had an adequate compression ultrasound examination of the legs on either day 10 or day 35 were categorized into 1 of 3 cohorts: no VTE, asymptomatic proximal DVT, or symptomatic DVT. Cox proportional hazards model, with adjustment for significant independent predictors of mortality, were used to compare the incidences of ACM. Of the 7036 patients, 6776 had no VTE, 236 had asymptomatic DVT, and 24 had symptomatic VTE. The incidence of ACM was 4.8% in patients without VTE. Both asymptomatic proximal DVT (mortality, 11.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.52-3.51; P <0.0001) and symptomatic VTE (mortality, 29.2%; HR, 9.42; 95% CI, 4.18-21.20; P <0.0001) were independently associated with significant increases in ACM. The analysis was post hoc, and ultrasound results were not available for all patients. Adjustment for baseline variables significantly associated with ACM may not fully compensate for differences. Conclusions Asymptomatic proximal DVT is associated with higher ACM than no VTE and remains a relevant end point to evaluate the efficacy of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00571649.