Search

The inferior vena cava (IVC) and superior vena cava are the main conduits of the systemic venous circulation into the right atrium. Developmental or procedural interruptions of vena cava might predispose to stasis and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) distal to the anomaly and may impact the subsequent rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to review the various etiologies of developmental or procedural vena cava interruption and their impact on venous thromboembolism. A systematic search was performed in PubMed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines per each clinical question. For management questions with no high-quality evidence and no mutual agreements between authors, Delphi methods were used. IVC agenesis is the most common form of congenital vena cava interruption, is associated with an increased risk of DVT, and should be suspected in young patients with unexpected extensive bilateral DVT. Surgical techniques for vena cava interruption (ligation, clipping, and plication) to prevent PE have been largely abandoned due to short-term procedural risks and long-term complications, although survivors of prior procedures are occasionally encountered. Vena cava filters are now the most commonly used method of procedural interruption, frequently placed in the infrarenal IVC. The most agreed-upon indication for vena cava filters is for patients with acute venous thromboembolism and coexisting contraindications to anticoagulation. Familiarity with different forms of vena cava interruption and their local and systemic adverse effects is important to minimize complications and thrombotic events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTo create an algorithm able to accurately detect IVC filters on radiographs without human assistance, capable of being used to screen radiographs to identify patients needing IVC filter retrieval.MethodsA primary dataset of 5225 images, 30% of which included IVC filters, was assembled and annotated. 85% of the data was used to train a Cascade R-CNN (Region Based Convolutional Neural Network) object detection network incorporating a pre-trained ResNet-50 backbone. The remaining 15% of the data, independently annotated by three radiologists, was used as a test set to assess performance. The algorithm was also assessed on an independently constructed 1424-image dataset, drawn from a different institution than the primary dataset.ResultsOn the primary test set, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 96.2% (95% CI 92.7-98.1%) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI 97.4-99.5%). Results were similar on the external test set: sensitivity 97.9% (95% CI 96.2-98.9%), specificity 99.6 (95% CI 98.9-99.9%).ConclusionFully automated detection of IVC filters on radiographs with high sensitivity and excellent specificity required for an automated screening system can be achieved using object detection neural networks. Further work will develop a system for identifying patients for IVC filter retrieval based on this algorithm.

Objective: Unusual clinical course Background: Duplicate inferior vena cava (IVC) accompanied by deep venous thrombosis is rare. The optimal treatment plan is determined according to the results of imaging, including venography. In this report, we present a case of successful treatment of a patient with duplicate IVC and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Case Report: An 84-year-old man with history of hypertension was admitted to the hospital because of 4 days of moderate left lower-limb edema. A thorough examination led to the diagnosis of the DVT. The duplicate IVC was discovered during venography. As the blood from the left common iliac vein mainly flowed to the left IVC, and there were no other communicating branches before the convergence of the left and right IVCs, which was located above the 1st lumbar vertebrae body near the junction of the hepatic vein and the IVC, the strategy of placing only 1 filter in the left inferior vena cava were chosen, rather than placing 1 filter above the confluence of bilateral IVC, or placing a filter in each IVC below the level of renal veins on each side. Following that, the DVT was safely treated with thrombolysis and aspiration without the risk of pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: This case report presented the complete evaluation and management of a patient with lower-limb DVT accompanied by the malformation of duplicate IVC. The filter placement strategy with duplicate IVC in the literature was summarized. We concluded that even in emergency situations, with comprehensive consideration, it is possible to perform endovascular intervention successfully and achieve satisfactory treatment results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are posited to effect flow dynamics, causing turbulence, vascular remodeling and eventual thrombosis; however, minimal data exists evaluating hemodynamic effects of IVC filters in vivo. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in hemodynamic flow parameters acquired with two-dimension (2D)-perfusion angiography before and after IVC filter placement or retrieval. 2D-perfusion images were reconstructed retrospectively from digital subtraction angiography from a cohort of 37 patients (13F/24M) before and after filter placement (n = 18) or retrieval (n = 23). Average dwell time was 239.5 ± 132.1 days. Changes in the density per pixel per second within a region of interest (ROI) were used to calculate contrast arrival time (AT), time-to-peak (TTP), wash-in-rate (WIR), and mean transit time (MTT). Measurements were obtained superior to, inferior to, and within the filter. Differences in hemodynamic parameters before and after intervention were compared, as well as correlation between parameters versus filter dwell time. A P value with Bonferroni correction of

A 93-year-old man with a femoral fracture was admitted to the emergency department. The patient presented with severe hypoxemia and shock. Enhanced computed tomography confirmed deep venous thrombosis in the left leg and pulmonary embolism. Subsequently, an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) was implanted. Although the IVCF was completely unsheathed for deployment, it remained fully folded and did not open; it was not deployed or retrieved. A new IVCF was successfully placed in the same position. Acute treatment for the deep venous thrombosis and further pulmonary embolism was achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare is the property of Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background COVID-19 and delayed hip surgery are well-known risk factors for thromboembolism in elderly patients. Case We report the case of an 88-year-old female patient with COVID-19 and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) who underwent delayed hip surgery 21 days after the injury. Heparinization and inferior vena cava filters were used to treat and prevent PTE. Transesophageal echocardiography and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation sheaths were inserted as a precaution in case of emergencies during surgery; the procedure was performed without any specific event. Conclusions COVID-19-infected patients suffering from a hip fracture have a high risk of thromboembolism, and therefore, require utmost attention for appropriate evaluation and prevention.

Purpose The present study was to evaluate the outcomes of Denali filter retrieval. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 143 patients who received Denali filter insertion from September 2015 to April 2020. Ninety-seven patients who required removal of the filters were include in this study. Filters were retrieved with either standard or advanced techniques. Venography before and after retrieval was obtained to evaluate technical success, complications and duration of filter insertion. Results All 97 filters were retrieved successfully without complications. Ninety-two (94.8%) were retrieved with standard technique and 5 filters (5.2%) required the advanced technique. There were two cases with a filter angle greater than 15 degrees. Inferior vena cava penetration was shown in 17 patients (17.5%) on venography but was not associated with contrast media extravasation after filter removal. Conclusion The Denali filter showed a high rate of successful retrieval without complications. This study adds value to previous studies and trials showing that the Denali filter is a reliable and safe filter that can potentially improve retrieval rates, with increasing use of this device.

Copyright of Medicina (Buenos Aires) is the property of Medicina (Buenos Aires) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The purpose of this study is to compare IVC Celect and ALN filters in regard to their efficacy, retrievability, and one-year follow-up after retrieval. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study, conducted in three centers between April 2020 and May 2021. A total of 115 participants were randomized, of which 15 participants were excluded for various reasons. Each group of 50 participants was finally assigned a type of filter (Celect n = 50 and ALN = 50). Tilt angles at placement and retrieval, rates of overall filter retrieval, complications, complex retrieval, and clinical follow-up at 12 months were compared. Results: One hundred participants (59 men and 41 women) were included. The mean age was 62.4 ± 13.3, with no significant differences between both groups (p 0.503). The mean of dwelling time was 44.7 ± 93 days. (p 0.520) Filter retrieval was successful in all participants (100%). The main complication in CT prior to removal was tilt >15° (31%) and filter tip embedment (16%). No significant differences were observed in the type of retrieval (standard or complex) between both filters (p 0.24); however, fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in the complex removal of the Celect filter: 29.1 ± 12 min vs. 17.5 ± 10.3 (p 0.005). After one year, no recurrent pulmonary embolism was observed in both types of filters. Conclusions: The ALN filter had a significantly lower rate of tip and filter tip embedding, with no differences in complexity or removal success rate. There were significant differences in the fluoroscopy time consumed for standard and complex retrievals between both filters, with less time for the ALN filter.

"Acute venous problems" refers to a group of disorders that affect the veins and result in sudden and severe symptoms. They can be classified based on the pathological triggering mechanisms, such as thrombosis and/or mechanical compression, and their consequences, including symptoms, signs, and complications. The management and therapeutic approach depend on the severity of the disease, the location, and the involvement of the vein segment. Although summarizing these conditions can be challenging, the objective of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the most common acute venous problems. This will include an exhaustive yet concise and practical description of each condition. The multidisciplinary approach remains one of the major advantages in dealing with these conditions, maximizing the results and the prevention of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement is indicated when there is a deep vein thrombosis and/or a pulmonary embolism and a contraindication of anticoagulation. Due to the increased risk of recurrent deep venous thrombosis when left in place, IVCF removal is indicated once anticoagulant treatment can be reintroduced. However, many temporary IVCF are not removed. We aimed to analyze the removal rate and predictors of filter non-removal in a university hospital setting. Methods: We collected all the data of consecutive patients who had a retrievable IVCF inserted at the Saint-Etienne University Hospital (France) between April 2012 and November 2019. Rates of filter removal were calculated. We analyzed patient characteristics to assess factors associated with filter non-removal, particularly in patients without a definitive filter indication. The exclusion of this last category of patients allowed us to calculate an adjusted removal rate. Results: The overall removal rate of IVCF was 40.5% (IC 95% 35.6–45.6), and the adjusted removal rate was 62.9 % (IC 95% 56.6–69.2%). No major complications were noted. Advanced age (p < 0.0001) and cancer presence (p < 0.003) were statistically significant predictors of patients not being requested to make a removal attempt. Conclusions: Although most of the filters placed are for therapeutic indications validated by scientific societies, the removal rate in this setting remains suboptimal. The major factors influencing IVCF removal rate are advanced age and cancer presence. Key Points: • Most vena cava filters are placed for therapeutic indications validated by scientific societies. • Vena cava filter removal rates in this setting remain suboptimal. • Major factors influencing IVCF removal rate are advanced age and cancer presence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 47-year-old male with a remote renal transplant due to pediatric glomerulonephritis on oral anticoagulation for symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli presented with sudden hip and groin pain. The patient was found to have a spinal epidural hematoma, underwent reversal of anticoagulation, and subsequently developed worsening renal function. Imaging revealed occlusive iliocaval venous thrombosis with extension to the renal allograft. Given risk of epidural hematoma expansion, the patient was deemed high risk for thrombolysis. The AngioVac system was used for single session thrombus removal. The patient's renal function improved and no focal neurologic sequelae was noted postprocedure. Six-month follow-up showed persistent vessel patency.

Removal of thrombosed inferior vena cava (IVC) filters can be complicated by the risk of thrombus embolization. A 67-year-old patient presented for temporary IVC filter retrieval with complaints of worsening lower extremity swelling. Diagnostic imaging identified significant filter thrombosis and bilateral lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In the present case, the novel Protrieve sheath was used to successfully remove the IVC filter and thrombus, with an estimated blood loss of 100 mL. The intraprocedurally generated embolus was trapped and removed without complication. This approach could mitigate embolization risks when removing thrombosed IVC filters or complex DVT.

Purpose: To investigate the long-term outcomes of using vena cava filters to prevent symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) in major trauma patients who have contraindications to prophylactic anticoagulation. Methods: This was an a priori sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving long-term outcome data of 223 patients who were enrolled in Western Australia. State-wide clinical information system, radiology database and death registry were used to assess long-term outcomes, including incidences of venous thromboembolism, venous injury and mortality beyond day-90 follow-up. Results: The median follow-up time of 198 patients (89%) who survived beyond 90 days was 65 months (interquartile range 59–73). Ten patients (5.1%) died after day-90 follow-up; and four patients developed venous thromboembolism, including two with symptomatic PE, all allocated to the control group (0 vs 4%, p = 0.043). Inferior vena cava injuries were not recorded in any patients. The mean total hospitalization cost, including the costs of the filter and its insertion and removal, to prevent one short- or long-term symptomatic PE was A$284,820 (€193,678) when all enrolled patients were considered. The number of patients needed to treat (NNT = 5) and total hospitalization cost to prevent one symptomatic PE (A$1,205 or €820) were, however, substantially lower when the filter was used only for patients who could not be anticoagulated within seven days of injury. Conclusion: Long-term complications related to retrievable filters were rare, and the cost of using filters to prevent symptomatic PE was acceptable when restricted to those who could not be anticoagulated within seven days of severe injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters prior to performing bariatric surgery is an intervention of unclear safety and efficacy with disagreement between current practice guidelines. To better characterize the risk and benefit of IVC filter insertion prior to bariatric surgery based on the current evidence. A systematic review of the literature of patients with prophylactic IVC filter insertion prior to bariatric surgery was performed and 32 studies were identified for inclusion into the review, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis was performed including the high-quality included studies. Seven high quality studies reported thrombotic events in patients undergoing bariatric surgery who had an IVCF and a control group which allowed for meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio of venous thrombotic events in the IVC filter population versus the group without IVC filters was 1.57 (95%CI 0.89, 2.76). Among high quality studies 5 reported major bleeding with a rate of 0.76% and 6 reported on IVC filter complications with a rate of 0.67%. Overall no significant reduction in the rate of venous thrombosis was found with prophylactic IVC filter insertion. Use of IVC filters for prophylaxis remains a concern given the lack of clear efficacy in this setting and a small but present complication risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retrievable inferior vena cava filters were designed to provide mechanical prophylaxis from pulmonary embolism with the intent for retrieval once no longer indicated, and have been utilized at a high rate since their introduction. Unfortunately, retrieval rates have historically lagged behind, in part due to significant rates of failed standard retrieval techniques for filters with prolonged dwell time. Refinement in advanced retrieval techniques has now allowed (in experienced centers) for safe removal of filters previously considered irretrievable. An individualized approach is necessary for each potential advanced filter retrieval to determine appropriate course of action. This review will emphasize complex filter retrieval techniques amidst a larger discussion of inferior vena cava filters and their management., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: A. Swersky declares no conflict of interest. K. Desai reports the following disclosures: Speaker’s bureau/consulting: Cook Medical, Boston Scientific, Becton Dickinson/CR Bard, Medtronic, Penumbra, Tactile Medical, Philips Consulting: W.L. Gore, Shockwave Medical, Asahi Intecc, Veryan, Cordis, Surmodics, CSI. Ethical Approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent for Publication: Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study. Informed Consent: For this type of study, informed consent is not required., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).)

Background: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter tilt is associated with technical difficulties at the time of retrieval. However, the degree of tilt that predisposes patients to undergo complex or failed retrieval has not been defined., Methods: The electronic charts of patients undergoing IVC filter removal between 2010 and 2019 at a single tertiary center were reviewed. Patient and procedural characteristics were recorded. Venograms of placement and retrieval procedures were reviewed, and IVC filter tilt was determined based on its deviation from the IVC axis. IVC diameter and the distance from the lowest renal vein were measured using corresponding filter's length for calibration. All measurements were performed by 3 reviewers and confirmed by 2 reviewers. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent successful removal procedures requiring standard retrieval methods ("simple retrieval group") and those who required advanced endovascular techniques or had failed completely IVC filter retrievals ("challenging retrieval group"). A regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with challenging retrieval., Results: There were 365 patients who underwent IVC filter retrieval (n = 294 (80.6%) and n = 71 (19.4%) in the simple and challenging groups, respectively) with no difference in age, sex, comorbidities, or indication between the 2 groups. Failed retrieval occurred in 21 patients (5.8%) and was more common among patients requiring advanced endovascular techniques compared to standard techniques (18.0% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001). In the overall cohort, the mean filter tilt at the time of retrieval was 4.9° ± 4.4° [0c27°], and 145 patients (39.7%) had a filter tilt ≥5.0°. Compared to the simple retrieval group, patients in the challenging group had significantly longer dwell time, greater tilt of IVC filter during placement and retrieval, as well as higher tilt change between the 2 venograms. There was no correlation between the access site during placement and challenging retrieval. However, patients undergoing filter placement via right jugular vein had lower filter tilt as compared to femoral access. Patients with filter tilt ≥5.0° were more likely to have a challenging filter retrieval compared to patients with ˂5.0° tilt (29.7% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that tilt ≥5.0° (odds ratio [OR] = 1.18 [1.11-1.25]), dwell time (OR = 1.04 [1.01-1.07]), and age (OR = 0.97 [0.95-0.99]) were independently associated with challenging retrieval., Conclusions: IVC filter tilt ≥5.0°, dwell time and age are associated with challenging retrieval. Right jugular vein access, multiple imaging projections, and careful filter manipulation during deployment should be considered to maintain tilt at ˂ 5.0° and decrease the likelihood of challenging retrieval., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Protein C deficiency is a hereditary disorder that increases the risk of thrombotic events but has unclear effects on rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) analysis. A man in his 60s with a history of protein C deficiency and multiple thrombotic events underwent inferior vena cava (IVC) filter removal, iliocaval thrombectomy and infrarenal IVC placement for IVC-related complete iliocaval and common femoral vein thromboses. A ROTEM analysis showed normal coagulation in NATEM and EXTEM and only a slight shortening in A10 and A20 in INTEM, which was unexpected given his diagnosis of protein C deficiency. Normal results indicate that there is complexity and variability of coagulation to maintain a balanced state even in individuals with underlying coagulation disorders., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To explore the ultrasonographic features and influencing factors of free-floating thrombus (FFT) detachment in the lower extremity deep veins (LEDVs) of patients with fractures., Methods: Clinical data of patients diagnosed with FFT in the LEDVs and implanted with an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) in our hospital between July 2021 and August 2023 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into the thrombus detachment group (the experimental group, n = 92) and the non-thrombus detachment group (the control group, n = 103) based on the presence of detached thrombus in the IVCF. The effects of thrombus echogenicity, floating degree, thrombus location, thrombin time, D-dimer and fibrinogen on thrombus shedding were analysed. The nomogram method was used to establish the model and predict the probability of delayed postoperative recovery., Results: The proportions of patients with extremely hypoechoic thrombus and medium and high floating degrees increased in the experimental group compared with those in the control group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Extremely hypoechoic thrombus (P = 0.021, 95 % CI: 1.109-13.748) and high (P = 0.001, 95 % CI: 3.854-28.573) and medium floating degrees (P = 0.004, 95 % CI: 1.792-13.453) were risk factors for deep veins FFT (DV FFT) detachment. The results of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of the model was 0.893, with a 95 % CI of 0.856-0.937, indicating a high prediction accuracy., Conclusion: Ultrasonographic parameters, including thrombus echogenicity and floating degree, are valuable in predicting DV FFT detachment in patients with traumatic fractures, providing references for IVCF implantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the placement factors of various retrievable inferior vena cava filters and retrieval outcomes. Additionally, we aimed to identify the factors affecting the placement tilt of the filter., Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center to investigate patients who had previously undergone retrievable filter placement at our center and who subsequently had their filters removed between January 2020 and December 2021. Patient characteristics and filter-related factors were recorded. Complex filter retrieval was defined as cases that required a minimum of 8 minutes of fluoroscopy or that involved advanced techniques. Regression models were used to explore patient- and placement procedure-related factors that could influence retrieval outcomes and the placement tilt angle., Results: The study included 163 patients, and all filters were successfully retrieved. Thirty-seven (22.7%) retrievals were classified as complex retrievals. The mean diameter of the inferior vena cava in the preplacement position for the entire cohort was 16 ± 1.8 mm. The median filter tilt angles at placement and retrieval were 5.0° (IQR, 1.8°-9°) and 4.6° (IQR, 2.1°-8.0°), respectively. The placement tilt angle was not significantly associated with complex retrieval (P = 0.59). The filter hook abutment to the vena cava wall (OR, 10.76, P = 0.003), dwell time (OR, 1.02, P = 0.029), and diameter of the vena cava (OR, 10.21, P < 0.001) were associated with complex retrieval. The diameter (P = 0.049), age (P = 0.049), and filter brand (P = 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with placement tilt., Conclusions: The inferior vena cava diameter at the time of placement predicts difficulty in filter retrieval. In addition, the filter hook abutting the inferior vena cava wall and long indwelling time may complicate retrieval. The vena cava diameter is also closely related to the degree of filter tilt., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is associated with important long-term complications. Predictive models for filter-related complications may help guide clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict 1-year IVC filter complications using preoperative data., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify patients who underwent IVC filter placement between 2013 and 2024. We identified 77 preoperative demographic and clinical features from the index hospitalization when the filter was placed. The primary outcome was 1-year filter-related complications (composite of filter thrombosis, migration, angulation, fracture, and embolization or fragmentation, vein perforation, new caval or iliac vein thrombosis, new pulmonary embolism, access site thrombosis, or failed retrieval). The data were divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Six ML models were trained using preoperative features with 10-fold cross-validation (Extreme Gradient Boosting, random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model robustness was assessed using calibration plot and Brier score. Performance was evaluated across subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, median Area Deprivation Index, planned duration of filter, landing site of filter, and presence of prior IVC filter placement., Results: Overall, 14,476 patients underwent IVC filter placement and 584 (4.0%) experienced 1-year filter-related complications. Patients with a primary outcome were younger (59.3 ± 16.7 years vs 63.8 ± 16.0 years; P < .001) and more likely to have thrombotic risk factors including thrombophilia, prior venous thromboembolism (VTE), and family history of VTE. The best prediction model was Extreme Gradient Boosting, achieving an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.94). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.65). Calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted/observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.07. The top 10 predictors of 1-year filter-related complications were (1) thrombophilia, (2) prior VTE, (3) antiphospholipid antibodies, (4) factor V Leiden mutation, (5) family history of VTE, (6) planned duration of IVC filter (temporary), (7) unable to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation, (8) malignancy, (9) recent or active bleeding, and (10) age. Model performance remained robust across all subgroups., Conclusions: We developed ML models that can accurately predict 1-year IVC filter complications, performing better than logistic regression. These algorithms have potential to guide patient selection for filter placement, counselling, perioperative management, and follow-up to mitigate filter-related complications and improve outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between minimum inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter magnification percentage and in-situ IVC thrombosis (iIVCT) after inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT)., Methods: This was a single center retrospective study. Study sample consisted of patients with LEDVT who received computed tomography venography of IVC both before and after IVCF placement between January 2019 and October 2023. A propensity score matching (PSM) was also used in covariates including age, hypertension, and thrombus limbs. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to mitigate the impact of selection bias and control for potential confounding variables. The incremental changes associated with minimum IVC diameter magnification percentage and iIVCT were evaluated with restricted cubic spines (RCS)., Results: 113 LEDVT patients (age 58.8 ± 17.8 years, 57.5% male) were included. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed a significant positive association between the minimum IVC diameter magnification percentage and the incidence of iIVCT after adjusting for the age, hypertension, and thrombus limbs (adjusted hazard risk [HR] = 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02, p < .001), suggesting minimum IVC diameter magnification percentage was an independent risk factor for iIVCT. Moreover, after using PSM, the association remained significant (HR=1.01, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02, p < .001). RCS analysis showed a non-linear dose-response association (s-shaped fitting curve) between minimum IVC diameter magnification percentage and iIVCT risk (nonlinear p = .041). The fitting curve indicated a threshold effect (overall p = .005), with a smaller magnification percentage being negatively associated with the incidence of iIVCT, presenting continuously decreasing HR at levels of magnification percentage < 37.3%., Conclusion: A decreasing minimum IVC diameter magnification percentage is consistently associated with a decreasing risk of iIVCT following IVCF placement when the percentage is < 37.3%, indicating that it is a protective factor against iIVCT incidence. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS?: This single-center retrospective study, which designed to investigate the relationship between minimum inferior vena cava diameter magnification percentage and in-situ inferior vena cava thrombosis (iIVCT) following inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in 113 patients, demonstrated that decreasing minimum IVC diameter magnification percentage is consistently associated with a decreasing risk of iIVCT following IVCF placement when the percentage is < 37.3%, indicating that it is a protective factor against iIVCT incidence., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The content of the manuscript is original, and it has not been published or accepted for publication., (Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aiming to improve the retrieval rate of retrievable vena cava filters (RVCF) and extend its dwelling time in vivo, a novel hydrogel coating loaded with 10 mg/mL heparin and 30 mg/mL cyclodextrin/paclitaxel (PTX) inclusion complex (IC) was prepared. The drug-release behavior in the phosphate buffer solution demonstrated both heparin and PTX could be sustainably released over approximately two weeks. Furthermore, it was shown that the hydrogel-coated RVCF (HRVCF) with 10 mg/mL heparin and 30 mg/mL PTX IC effectively extended the blood clotting time to above the detection limit and inhibited EA.hy926 and CCC-SMC-1 cells' proliferation in vitro compared to the commercially available bare RVCF. Both the HRVCF and the bare RVCF were implanted into the vena cava of sheep and retrieved at at 2nd and 4th week after implantation, revealing that the HRVCF had a significantly higher retrieval rate of 67 % than the bare RVCF (0 %) at 4th week. Comprehensive analyses, including histological, immunohistological, and immunofluorescent assessments of the explanted veins demonstrated the HRVCF exhibited anti-hyperplasia and anticoagulation properties in vivo, attributable to the hydrogel coating, thereby improving the retrieval rate in sheep. Consequently, the as-prepared HRVCF shows promising potential for clinical application to enhance the retrieval rates of RVCFs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Abstract Background We herein present a case of venous thrombosis that developed more than 20 years after diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), although many reports of GPA have described venous thrombosis within 1 year of diagnosis. Case presentation A 73-year-old man with GPA was admitted for lower extremity swelling and diagnosed with venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. On the second day, catheter-based thrombolysis was unsuccessful, and inferior vena cava filter insertion and anticoagulation were performed. On the third day, respiratory disturbance and loss of consciousness appeared and progressed. The patient died on the fifth day. The autopsy revealed a large thrombus in the inferior vena cava filter, and death of progressive venous thrombosis was suspected. Conclusions We experienced a case of venous thrombosis that developed 20 years after diagnosis of GPA, although GPA is frequently associated with venous thrombosis immediately after diagnosis. The thrombosis progressed rapidly and was resistant to treatment.

Abstract Inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT) is rare and can be under-recognized. However, the associated complications and mortality may be severe. We report the first case series of IVCT observed in Taiwan with a brief literature review. Eight Taiwanese patients with IVCT between May 2012 and December 2019 were enrolled in this study. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT, 8/8) and pulmonary embolism (5/8) were reported. Various risk factors were identified, including an unretrieved inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, pregnancy, surgery, presence of lupus of anticoagulants, essential thrombocythemia, antithrombin deficiency, and hemoglobin H disease. Of note, four of our patients experienced complete IVC thrombosis with bilateral lower extremity swelling (due to DVT) and abdominal wall superficial venous dilatation, while four other patients presented with partial IVCT and unilateral DVT. The etiology, clinical characteristics, presentations, diagnosis, and treatment of IVCT were reviewed.

Objectives: Inferior vena cava (IVC) penetration is a prevalent complication following the placement of conical filters. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the penetration in smaller IVC. The objective of this study was to assess the time of penetration, the incidence of serious complications associated with penetration, and the process of IVC wall repair in the smaller IVC following the placement of a conical filter., Methods: Twenty pigs were randomly assigned to 2 groups and received either Celect or Denali filters. Weekly follow-up imaging using computed tomography venography (CTV) of the IVC was conducted to monitor the position of the IVC filter struts until at least 1 strut was observed to be penetrating the vessel wall. At necropsy, a comprehensive gross and histological examination was performed on the IVC and adjacent anatomical structures in all animals., Results: The puncture and cavography procedures were successfully conducted on all animals, and no significant differences were found in the mean diameter of the IVC between the Celect and Denali groups (15.89 ± 1.27 mm vs. 16.39 ± 1.39 mm, P > 0.05). All filters were implanted without complications. CTV detected IVC penetration within 9 weeks, which was confirmed during necropsy. The Celect group had a significantly earlier time of IVC penetration compared to the Denali group (2.43 ± 0.52 weeks vs. 6.81 ± 1.32 weeks, P ＜ 0.001). No evidence of filter tilt, fracture, migration, caval thromboses, retroperitoneal bleeding, wall hematoma, tearing of the IVC wall, or peripheral tissue and organ damage was observed during the CTV and subsequent necropsy. Additionally, histological analysis showed that the Celect group had a lower percentage area of collagen fiber compared to the Denali group (33.92% vs. 49.04%, P ＜ 0.001). The fiber proliferation was positively correlated linearly with the indwelling time of filter (r = 0.97, P ＜ 0.001)., Conclusions: Penetration can occur within a relatively brief period following the placement of the conical filter into the smaller IVC. Nevertheless, no short-term severe complications were observed in connection with the penetration. The proliferation of fibers in the IVC wall exhibited a positive linear correlation with the duration of filter indwelling., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

ABSTRACT Inferior vena cava filter embolization is not uncommon and can reach 11.8%. However, device migration to the heart is not frequent and occurs in cases after inferior vena cava filter fracture. We present the case of a young woman who was submitted to a routine inferior vena cava filter placement three days before and presented with hemodynamic instability. Since the device was not retrievable, the surgical team opted for an open cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass to remove the inferior vena cava filter and avoid other further complications.

BackgroundFew studies have evaluated the use and outcomes of inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) insertion in cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE).MethodsHospital records of patients with a principal diagnosis of lower extremity DVT and/or PE and cancer in California between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with IVCF use and propensity matched methodology was used to determine the effect of IVCF insertion on clinical outcomes.ResultsAn IVCF was placed in 19.6% of 14,000 cancer patients and VTE. This varied widely across hospitals, from 0% to 52%, and by cancer type. The strongest predictors of IVCF use were a diagnosis of brain cancer (OR=4.6, CI: 3.7-5.6), undergoing major surgery (OR=4.9, CI: 3.9-6.1), and bleeding (OR=2.7, CI: 2.0-3.5). Only 21% of patients with IVCF had a strong contraindication to anticoagulation (bleeding or major surgery). There was no benefit for 30-day mortality and no reduction in subsequent PE (+/-DVT). Additionally, there was 60% increased risk of recurrent DVT and 20% increased risk of subsequent bleeding when an IVCF was placed.ConclusionsAn IVCF was placed in approximately 20% of acute VTE patients with cancer and use varied widely between hospitals and cancer types. Most patients did not have a contraindication for anticoagulation. There was no benefit in short-term mortality or risk of PE; there was increased risk of DVT and subsequent bleeding.

Isolated deep femoral artery aneurysms are rare and tend to be large at the time of diagnosis owing to their deep anatomic location. Deep femoral artery aneurysms are often complicated by rupture, with subsequent lower limb amputation. However, a large aneurysm can compress the surrounding deep femoral vein, leading to thrombosis. In the present report, we have described a rare surgical case of deep femoral artery aneurysm complicated by deep femoral vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Preoperative inferior vena cava filter placement was effective for preventing perioperative worsening of the pulmonary embolism in this particular circumstance.

Inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis is often attributed to IVC filters. Here, we describe the first case of IVC filter thrombosis associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection in a 34-year-old male with multiple pelvic fractures. The IVC filter was initially placed prophylactically prior to major orthopedic trauma reconstruction complicated by silent pulmonary embolism, precluding the safe transition to therapeutic anticoagulation due to the high hemorrhagic risk from pelvic fracture fixation. This case highlights the potentially increased risk of severe complications in patients receiving vascular care if they were to contract coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in the hospital. IVC filter placement in the patient resulted in complete IVC thrombosis after he acquired COVID-19 infection. Prophylactic doses of low molecular weight heparin could not prevent this complication. However, prompt initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban led to the complete resolution of IVC thrombosis over weeks after viral negativization and discharge.

Deep vein thrombosis is one of the main causes of inpatient and outpatient morbidity, both in medical and surgical patients, significantly impacting mortality statistics and requiring prompt diagnosis so that treatment can be initiated immediately. This document was prepared and reviewed by 11 specialists certified by the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, who searched the main databases for the best evidence on the diagnostic (physical examination, imaging) and therapeutic approaches (heparin, coumarins, direct oral anticoagulants, fibrinolytics) to the disease., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this article., (Copyright© 2024 The authors.)

Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) implantation is a common method of thrombus capture. By implanting a filter in the inferior vena cava (IVC), microemboli can be effectively blocked from entering the pulmonary circulation, thereby avoiding acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Inspired by the helical flow effect in the human arterial system, we propose a helical retrievable IVCF, which, due to the presence of a helical structure inducing a helical flow pattern of blood in the region near the IVCF, can effectively avoid the deposition of microemboli in the vicinity of the IVCF while promoting the cleavage of the captured thrombus clot. It also reduces the risk of IVCF dislodging and slipping in the vessel because its shape expands in the radial direction, allowing its distal end to fit closely to the IVC wall, and because its contact structure with the inner IVC wall is curved, increasing the contact area and reducing the risk of the vessel wall being punctured by the IVCF support structure. We used ANSYS 2023 software to conduct unidirectional fluid-structure coupling simulation of four different forms of IVCF, combined with microthrombus capture experiments in vitro, to explore the impact of these four forms of IVCF on blood flow patterns and to evaluate the risk of IVCF perforation and IVCF dislocation. It can be seen from the numerical simulation results that the helical structure does have the function of inducing blood flow to undergo helical flow dynamics, and the increase in wall shear stress (WSS) brought about by this function can improve the situation of thrombosis accumulation to a certain extent. Meanwhile, the placement of IVCF will change the flow state of blood flow and lead to the deformation of blood vessels. In in vitro experiments, we found that the density of the helical support rod is a key factor affecting the thrombus trapping efficiency, and in addition, the contact area between the IVCF and the vessel wall has a major influence on the risk of IVCF displacement., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to prevent fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolism in patients who otherwise cannot receive anticoagulation for venous thrombosis. While generally safe and effective, complications can arise, especially after prolonged implantation. Timely retrieval is essential once the indication for insertion has resolved. However, encountering patients with long-standing embedded filters is not uncommon. This case report discusses the successful retrieval of a permanent Greenfield IVC filter after 29 years., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Objectives: This study evaluated the utilization and outcomes of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters as thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients undergoing surgery., Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of surgical cancer patients who received perioperative prophylactic IVC filters. Primary clinical endpoints included venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence and filter complications. A statistical correlative analysis was conducted to identify risk factors related to pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and filter thrombi, as well as advanced technique filter removal and mortality at 6 months., Results: A total of 252 surgical oncology patients (median age, 59; female 51%) received IVC filters for the perioperative prevention of PE. Primary surgical sites included spine (n = 91, 36%), orthopedic extremity/joint (n = 49, 19%), genitourinary (n = 47, 19%), brain/cranial (n = 40, 16%), abdominal (n = 18, 7%), multisite (n = 4, 2%), and chest (n = 3, 1%). Moreover, 15% of patients experienced DVTs in the postplacement preretrieval period, while 2% (n = 6) of patients experienced definitive PEs. A total of 36% of IVC filters were ultimately retrieved, with an average filter dwell time of 7.4 months. Complications occurred in one retrieval., Conclusion: Prophylactic perioperative IVC filters in surgical cancer patients resulted in minimal complications while ultimately resulting in a low incidence of PE., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose of Review: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death and morbidity, and presents a major burden to healthcare systems. The field has seen rapid growth with development of innovative clot reduction technologies, as well as ongoing multicenter trials that may completely revolutionize care of PE patients. However, current paucity of robust clinical trials and guidelines often leave individual physicians managing patients with acute PE in a dilemma., Recent Findings: The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) was developed as a platform to rapidly engage multiple specialists to deliver evidence-based, organized and efficient care and help address some of the gaps in knowledge. Several centers investigating outcomes following implementation of PERT have demonstrated shorter hospital and intensive-care unit stays, lower use of inferior vena cava filters, and in some instances improved mortality. Since the advent of PERT, early findings demonstrate promise with improved outcomes after implementation of PERT. Incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into PERT has also shown promise with more streamlined care and reducing response times. Further clinical trials are needed to examine the impact of PERT model on care delivery and clinical outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: This study aimed to characterize radiographic characteristics on computed tomography venography and risk factors of inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT) in situ after retrievable vena cava filter (VCF) placement., Methods: Between September 2018 and June 2023, a single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with or without IVCT in situ following VCF placement. Patient baseline demographics, presentation of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT), thrombus characteristics, concurrent pulmonary embolism, comorbidities and risk factors for LEDVT, and IVCT and VCF-related information were collected and analysed. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: One hundred and seventeen eligible patients were included, regionally isolated filling-defect surrounding the support pillars of VCF and contacting inferior vena cava (IVC) wall on computed tomography venography images were identified, clots were more frequently found on the minor axis or anterior wall of IVC. Univariable analyses suggested that the incidence of IVCT in situ (31.6%, 37/117) was closely associated with age (P = .001), thrombus limb (left (P = .001) and bilateral side (P = .001)), hypertension (P = .008), filter shapes (P < .001), short IVC diameter (P = .009) or magnification percentage (P = .004), and long IVC diameter (P = .006). Multivariable analyses suggested that bilateral side LEDVT (OR, 4.92; 95% CI, 1.56-15.51; P = .007) and increased short IVC magnification percentage (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .013) statistically significant increase the IVCT in situ risk, whereas increased age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .013) and short IVC diameter (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .026) were associated with decreased odds against IVCT in situ., Conclusions: IVCT in situ represents regionally isolated filling-defect at points of filter contact with IVC wall. Bilateral side LEDVT and increased short IVC magnification percentage may be potential risk factors impacting the occurrence of IVCT in situ, while increased age and short IVC diameter may decrease the incidence of IVCT in situ and seem to be protective factor against IVCT in situ emergence., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients is an uncommon but serious diagnosis that has an array of therapeutic options and challenges. An assessment of the existing literature on management of pediatric patients with VTE was conducted. The interventions reviewed include anticoagulation, thrombolysis, thrombectomy, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, and venous stenting. For each intervention, a discussion of mechanism of action, indications, contraindications, and potential complications was performed. While anticoagulants are considered the first-line pediatric VTE treatment, many drugs remain investigational in this patient population and treatment recommendations are extrapolated from adult practice. Thrombolysis may be indicated in cases of acute thrombosis requiring more rapid clot resolution but presents a greater bleeding risk than anticoagulation. Similarly, thrombectomy also provides rapid clot resolution and offers a larger therapeutic window and usage in more mature thrombi than thrombolysis. In select patient groups, IVC filters may be indicated in the prevention of PE but present with inherent thrombogenicity and risk of migration. The data regarding pediatric VTE treatment options, monitoring, and long term outcomes is limited compared to the adult population. The relatively few clinical trials including pediatric patients have a relatively small sample size and are heterogenous with regards to predisposing factors that further exacerbate generalizability. Additional research is needed to help construct and evaluate a robust treatment algorithm for pediatric patients with VTE., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to analyze the luminal changes in the iliocaval veins and their effects on the development of signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease manifesting from inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement., Methods: This was a retrospective observations study; deidentified patients with an IVC filter placed with subsequent luminal changes were included. All patients had a computerized tomography (CT) scan with or without ultrasound and those who underwent an intervention for the obstruction had also venography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The diameter of IVC and iliac veins was measured from the near wall to the far wall. IVC diameters measured less than 12 mm were considered to be retractions. Signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease were obtained from patient charts and were reported according to the highest CEAP class. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, presenting diameter changes as a mean with standard deviation and a range of diameters included., Results: Overall, 76 patients were included in this study, of whom 66 had occlusion of the IVC or the Iliac veins. Luminal changes of the IVC were observed in all patients. A total of 58 patients presented with chronic post-thrombotic changes in both the IVC and iliac veins. There were 4 patients that had a luminal reduction with no filling defects or post-thrombotic changes. Average IVC diameter and iliac vein diameter was measured to be 8.3 ± 1.4 mm and 4.6 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. Patients most frequently presented with extremity swelling, but other signs such as venous ulceration or skin damage were observed., Conclusions: Permanent luminal changes of the IVC and iliac veins were observed as a result of IVC filter placement and such patients commonly present with signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease. Together, with other known filter complications, these observations add more reasons for a timely retrieval. When such changes occur, patients' appropriate symptoms can be successfully treated. The permanent changes made by filter placement in the IVC and iliac veins further support filter retrieval in a timely fashion. The luminal changes induced by filter placement should be recognized early, particularly in symptomatic patients who can be safely treated with endovenous procedures., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inferior vena cava filter embolization is not uncommon and can reach 11.8%. However, device migration to the heart is not frequent and occurs in cases after inferior vena cava filter fracture. We present the case of a young woman who was submitted to a routine inferior vena cava filter placement three days before and presented with hemodynamic instability. Since the device was not retrievable, the surgical team opted for an open cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass to remove the inferior vena cava filter and avoid other further complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects approximately 17,000 Australians annually. While anticoagulation is the mainstay of treatment, inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are used in patients where this is contraindicated. The primary aim was to identify risk factors for complex retrievals and IVCF‐related complications following the establishment of a database at a single tertiary centre. The secondary aim was to evaluate the IVCF retrieval rate and patients lost to follow‐up. Methods: A retrospective study at a single tertiary centre was conducted on IVCFs inserted from 2012 to 2018. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate potential risk factors for filter‐related complications and complex retrievals. Results: In total, 402 patients had an IVCF inserted. Of these, 308 patients (77%) had a retrieval attempted, 10 (3%) of which required more than one retrieval attempt (complex retrieval). Factors associated with filter‐related complications included dwell time (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.04) and select indications for insertion, namely VTE requiring thrombolysis/thrombectomy (OR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.02–5.16) and iliocaval/free‐floating iliofemoral DVT without thrombectomy/thrombolysis (OR 5.89, 95% CI: 1.53–22.71). After mutual adjustment for all variables, only dwell time remained a significant factor for filter‐related complications (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05) and complex retrieval (AOR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.08). The annual retrieval rate increased from 73% (2012) to 83% (2018), with an overall retrieval rate of 75%. Conclusion: Dwell time is a potential risk factor for filter‐related complications and complex retrievals. The annual IVCF retrieval rate was 75% since an Interventional Radiology‐led database was established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We herein present a case of venous thrombosis that developed more than 20 years after diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), although many reports of GPA have described venous thrombosis within 1 year of diagnosis. Case presentation: A 73-year-old man with GPA was admitted for lower extremity swelling and diagnosed with venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. On the second day, catheter-based thrombolysis was unsuccessful, and inferior vena cava filter insertion and anticoagulation were performed. On the third day, respiratory disturbance and loss of consciousness appeared and progressed. The patient died on the fifth day. The autopsy revealed a large thrombus in the inferior vena cava filter, and death of progressive venous thrombosis was suspected. Conclusions: We experienced a case of venous thrombosis that developed 20 years after diagnosis of GPA, although GPA is frequently associated with venous thrombosis immediately after diagnosis. The thrombosis progressed rapidly and was resistant to treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundFew studies have evaluated the use of vena cava filters (VCF) in cancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE).MethodsHospital discharge records of patients who were admitted with a principal diagnosis of lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and cancer in California between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with VCF use.ResultsA VCF was placed in 2747 (19.6%) of 14,000 cancer patients. The percentage of patients treated with a VCF varied widely across hospitals, from 0% to 52% (mean=19.2%, median=17.2%), and by cancer type, ranging from 8% for lip/oral to 43% for brain. Using multivariable analysis, the strongest predictors of VCF use were a diagnosis of brain cancer (OR=4.6, CI: 3.7 -5.6), undergoing major surgery (OR=4.9, CI: 3.9 -6.1), and bleeding (OR=2.7, CI: 2.0-3.5). Other factors significantly associated with VCF insertion included hospital characteristics (larger, urban and private), and greater severity-of-illness at the time of admission. Only 1083 (7.7%) of patients had an absolute contraindication to anticoagulation (bleeding or surgery).ConclusionsA VCF was deployed in approximately 20% of acute VTE patients with cancer, but use varied widely between hospitals and cancer types. The strongest risk factors were undergoing surgery, active bleeding, and having brain cancer. Only 21% of VCF treated cancer patients had a strict contraindication to anticoagulation therapy. Further research is needed to determine if VCF use is of any benefit in cancer patients with acute VTE.

Percutaneous procedures through femoral access in patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter may be at risk of complications. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) through femoral access in patients previously implanted with IVC filter. We described the WatchmanTM device implantation in two patients with formal contraindication for oral anticoagulation. First patient had a GreenfieldTM filter and the second one an OpteaseTM filter, and in this patient an attempt to withdrawal the filter immediately before the LAAC procedure failed. A femoral approach was performed in both patients using a 14 Fr sheath. Before crossing IVC filters, venographies did not detect any thrombus. All steps of IVC filter crossing were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. No immediate or intrahospital complications related to the procedure occurred. Herein, we presented two cases of successful LAAC closure with Watchman device in patients with two different kinds of IVC filters.