1. Prognostic relevance of mitotic activity in patients with node-negative breast cancer.
- Author
-
Medri L, Volpi A, Nanni O, Vecci AM, Mangia A, Schittulli F, Padovani F, Giunchi DC, Zito A, Amadori D, Paradiso A, and Silvestrini R
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms physiopathology, Female, Humans, Likelihood Functions, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Survival Analysis, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Lymph Nodes pathology, Mitotic Index
- Abstract
The prognostic relevance of mitotic activity was analyzed in a series of 306 patients with node-negative breast cancer treated with locoregional therapy alone, until early relapse. Mitotic activity was evaluated as the number of mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields (mitotic activity index) or per 1000 tumor cells (mitotic index). Counting was carried out blindly by two observers. A high correlation was observed between the two determinations (r(s) =.96, P <.001). For clinical analysis, three mitotic activity index subgroups (mitotic figures/field = 9, 10-19 and more than 19, according to grading criteria) and three mitotic index subgroups (percentage of mitotic figures less than 0.10, 0.11-0.50 and more than 0.50, according to tertile criteria) were considered. No relation was observed between mitotic variables and 6-year disease-free survival, whereas distant disease-free survival was strongly related to mitotic figures per 10 fields (85%, 89% and 70%, P =.012) and to the percentage of mitotic figures out of a total 1000 tumor cells (87%, 86% and 75%, P =.017). Similarly, both mitotic indices were significantly related to 6-year overall survival (99%, 95% and 77%, P <.001, for mitotic figures per 10 fields and 99%, 93% and 82%, P <.001, for the percentage of mitotic figures). These findings were particularly evident in patients with tumors of 1-2 cm. In conclusion, a high number of mitotic figures is associated with a higher probability of developing distant metastases and a shorter survival. The critical point remains the standardization of the preanalytical and analytical steps within quality control programs.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF