Search

Carbon cycle feedbacks represent large uncertainties in climate change projections, and the response of soil carbon to climate change contributes the greatest uncertainty to this. Future changes in soil carbon depend on changes in litter and root inputs from plants and especially on reductions in the turnover time of soil carbon (τs) with warming. An approximation to the latter term for the top one metre of soil (ΔCs,τ) can be diagnosed from projections made with the CMIP6 and CMIP5 Earth System Models (ESMs), and is found to span a large range even at 2 °C of global warming (-196 ± 117 PgC). Here, we present a constraint on ΔCs,τ, which makes use of current heterotrophic respiration and the spatial variability of τs inferred from observations. This spatial emergent constraint allows us to halve the uncertainty in ΔCs,τ at 2 °C to -232 ± 52 PgC.

Achieving climate targets requires mitigation against climate change but also understanding of the response of land and ocean carbon systems. In this context, global soil carbon stocks and their response to environmental changes are key. This paper quantifies the global soil carbon feedbacks due to changes in atmospheric CO 2 , and the associated climate changes, for Earth system models (ESMs) in CMIP6. A standard approach is used to calculate carbon cycle feedbacks, defined here as soil carbon-concentration (βs) and carbon-climate (γs) feedback parameters, which are also broken down into processes which drive soil carbon change. The sensitivity to CO 2 is shown to dominate soil carbon changes at least up to a doubling of atmospheric CO 2. However, the sensitivity of soil carbon to climate change is found to become an increasingly important source of uncertainty under higher atmospheric CO 2 concentrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Achieving climate targets requires mitigation against climate change, but also understanding of the response of land and ocean carbon systems. In this context, global soil carbon stocks and its response to environmental changes is key. This paper quantifies the global soil carbon feedback to changes in atmospheric CO2, and associated climate changes, for Earth system models (ESMs) in CMIP6. A standard approach is used to calculate carbon cycle feedbacks, defined here as soil specific carbon-concentration (βs) and carbon-climate (γs) feedback parameters. The sensitivity to CO2 is shown to dominate soil carbon changes at least up to a doubling of atmospheric CO2. However, the sensitivity of soil carbon to climate change is found to become an increasingly important source of uncertainty under higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reliable estimates of soil carbon change are required to determine the carbon budgets consistent with the Paris Agreement climate targets. This study evaluates projections of soil carbon during the 21st century in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Earth system models (ESMs) under a range of atmospheric composition scenarios. In general, we find a reduced spread of changes in global soil carbon (ΔCs) in CMIP6 compared to the previous CMIP5 model generation. However, similar reductions were not seen in the derived contributions to ΔCs due to both increases in plant net primary productivity (NPP, named ΔCs,NPP) and reductions in the effective soil carbon turnover time (τs , named ΔCs,τ). Instead, we find a strong relationship across the CMIP6 models between these NPP and τs components of ΔCs , with more positive values of ΔCs,NPP being correlated with more negative values of ΔCs,τ. We show that the concept of "false priming" is likely to be contributing to this emergent relationship, which leads to a decrease in the effective soil carbon turnover time as a direct result of NPP increase and occurs when the rate of increase in NPP is relatively fast compared to the slower timescales of a multi-pool soil carbon model. This finding suggests that the structure of soil carbon models within ESMs in CMIP6 has likely contributed towards the reduction in the overall model spread in future soil carbon projections since CMIP5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reliable estimates of soil carbon change are required to determine the carbon budgets consistent with the Paris climate targets. This study evaluates projections of soil carbon during the 21st century in CMIP6 Earth System Models (ESMs) under a range of atmospheric composition scenarios. In general, we find a reduced spread of changes in global soil carbon (Δ Cs) in CMIP6 compared to the previous CMIP5 model generation. However, similar reductions were not seen in the derived contributions to Δ Cs due to both increases in plant Net Primary Productivity (NPP, named Δ Cs , NPP) and reductions in the effective soil carbon turnover time (τ s , named Δ Cs,τ). Instead, we find a strong relationship across the CMIP6 models between these NPP and τ s components of Δ Cs , with more positive values of Δ Cs , NPP being correlated with more negative values of Δ Cs,τ. We show that this emergent relationship is the result of 'false priming', which leads to a decrease in the effective soil carbon turnover time as a direct result of NPP increase and occurs when the rate of increase of NPP is relatively fast compared to the slower timescales of a multipool soil carbon model. The inclusion of more soil carbon models with multiple pools in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5, therefore seems to have contributed towards the reduction in the overall model spread in future soil carbon projections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Molluscs biomineralize structures that vary in composition, form, and function, prompting questions about the genetic mechanisms responsible for their production and the evolution of these mechanisms. Chitons (Mollusca, Polyplacophora) are a promising system for studies of biomineralization because they build a range of calcified structures including shell plates and spine- or scale-like sclerites. Chitons also harden the calcified teeth of their rasp-like radula with a coat of iron (as magnetite). Here we present the genome of the West Indian fuzzy chiton Acanthopleura granulata , the first from any aculiferan mollusc. The A. granulata genome contains homologs of many genes associated with biomineralization in conchiferan molluscs. We expected chitons to lack genes previously identified from pathways conchiferans use to make biominerals like calcite and nacre because chitons do not use these materials in their shells. Surprisingly, the A. granulata genome has homologs of many of these genes, suggesting that the ancestral mollusc may have had a more diverse biomineralization toolkit than expected. The A. granulata genome has features that may be specialized for iron biomineralization, including a higher proportion of genes regulated directly by iron than other molluscs. A. granulata also produces two isoforms of soma-like ferritin: one is regulated by iron and similar in sequence to the soma-like ferritins of other molluscs, and the other is constitutively translated and is not found in other molluscs. The A. granulata genome is a resource for future studies of molluscan evolution and biomineralization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The extent to which evolution is predictable is a long-standing question in biology, with implications for urgent biological issues such as viral evolution, the emergence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria, and organismal responses to climate change. Convergent evolution, the phylogenetically independent evolution of similar phenotypes, provides biological replicates useful for exploring patterns of predictability in evolution. Understanding evolutionary convergence requires synthesizing findings across biological scales and organisms. To this end, we organized a SICB-wide symposium entitled "Integrating research on convergent evolution across levels of biological organization, organisms, and time". Our symposium showcased interdisciplinary research on evolutionary convergence across diverse study systems and levels of biological organization, while highlighting new techniques and comparative methods for identifying patterns of predictability in convergently evolved traits. Here, we introduce findings from papers included in this symposium issue and identify common themes, highlight emerging questions, and discuss how we can integrate new techniques, tools, and systems to expand our understanding of evolutionary convergence., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology.)