Search

Real time radioluminescence fibre-based detectors were investigated for application in proton, helium, and carbon therapy dosimetry. The Al2O3:C probes are made of one single crystal (1 mm) and two droplets of micro powder in two sizes (38 μm and 4 μm) mixed with a water-equivalent binder. The fibres were irradiated behind different thicknesses of solid slabs, and the Bragg curves presented a quenching effect attributed to the nonlinear response of the radioluminescence (RL) signal as a function of linear energy transfer (LET). Experimental data and Monte Carlo simulations were utilised to acquire a quenching correction method, adapted from Birks' formulation, to restore the linear dose–response for particle therapy beams. The method for quenching correction was applied and yielded the best results for the '4 μm' optical fibre probe, with an agreement at the Bragg peak of 1.4% (160 MeV), and 1.5% (230 MeV) for proton-charged particles; 2.4% (150 MeV/u) for helium-charged particles and of 4.8% (290 MeV/u) and 2.9% (400 MeV/u) for the carbon-charged particles. The most substantial deviations for the '4 μm' optical fibre probe were found at the falloff regions, with ~3% (protons), ~5% (helium) and 6% (carbon). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. This work investigates the use of passive luminescence detectors to determine different types of averaged linear energy transfer (LET-) for the energies relevant to proton therapy. The experimental results are compared to reference values obtained from Monte Carlo simulations. Approach. Optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs), fluorescent nuclear track detectors (FNTDs), and two different groups of thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs) were irradiated at four different radiation qualities. For each irradiation, the fluence- (LET-f) and dose-averaged LET (LET-d) were determined. For both quantities, two sub-types of averages were calculated, either considering the contributions from primary and secondary protons or from all protons and heavier, charged particles. Both simulated and experimental data were used in combination with a phenomenological model to estimate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Main results. All types ofLET-could be assessed with the luminescence detectors. The experimental determination ofLET-fis in agreement with reference data obtained from simulations across all measurement techniques and types of averaging. On the other hand,LET-dcan present challenges as a radiation quality metric to describe the detector response in mixed particle fields. However, excluding secondaries heavier than protons from theLET-dcalculation, as their contribution to the luminescence is suppressed by ionization quenching, leads to equal accuracy betweenLET-fandLET-d. Assessment of RBE through the experimentally determinedLET-dvalues agrees with independently acquired reference values, indicating that the investigated detectors can determineLET-with sufficient accuracy for proton therapy. Significance. OSLDs, TLDs, and FNTDs can be used to determineLET-and RBE in proton therapy. With the capability to determine dose through ionization quenching corrections derived fromLET-, OSLDs and TLDs can simultaneously ascertain dose,LET-, and RBE. This makes passive detectors appealing for measurements in phantoms to facilitate validation of clinical treatment plans or experiments related to proton therapy., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)

Purpose: The current knowledge on biological effects associated with proton therapy is limited. Therefore, we investigated the distributions of dose, dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET d ), and the product between dose and LET d (DLET d ) for a patient cohort treated with proton therapy. Different treatment planning system features and visualization tools were explored., Methods and Materials: For a cohort of 24 patients with brain tumors, the LET d , DLET d , and dose was calculated for a fixed relative biological effectiveness value and 2 variable models: plan-based and phenomenological. Dose threshold levels of 0, 5, and 20 Gy were imposed for LET d visualization. The relationship between physical dose and LET d and the frequency of LET d hotspots were investigated., Results: The phenomenological relative biological effectiveness model presented consistently higher dose values. For lower dose thresholds, the LET d distribution was steered toward higher values related to low treatment doses. Differences up to 26.0% were found according to the threshold. Maximum LET d values were identified in the brain, periventricular space, and ventricles. An inverse relationship between LET d and dose was observed. Frequency information to the domain of dose and LET d allowed for the identification of clusters, which steer the mean LET d values, and the identification of higher, but sparse, LET d values., Conclusions: Identifying, quantifying, and recording LET distributions in a standardized fashion is necessary, because concern exists over a link between toxicity and LET hotspots. Visualizing DLET d or dose × LET d during treatment planning could allow for clinicians to make informed decisions., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background and Purpose: Reducing breathing motion in radiotherapy (RT) is an attractive strategy to reduce margins and better spare normal tissues. The objective of this prospective study (NCT03729661) was to investigate the feasibility of irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with visually guided moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (IBH) using nasal high-flow therapy (NHFT)., Material and Methods: Locally advanced NSCLC patients undergoing photon RT were given NHFT with heated humidified air (flow: 40 L/min with 80% oxygen) through a nasal cannula. IBH was monitored by optical surface tracking (OST) with visual feedback. At a training session, patients had to hold their breath as long as possible, without and with NHFT. For the daily cone beam CT (CBCT) and RT treatment in IBH, patients were instructed to keep their BH as long as it felt comfortable. OST was used to analyze stability and reproducibility of the BH, and CBCT to analyze daily tumor position. Subjective tolerance was measured with a questionnaire at 3 time points., Results: Of 10 included patients, 9 were treated with RT. Seven (78%) completed the treatment with NHFT as planned. At the training session, the mean BH length without NHFT was 39 s (range 15-86 s), and with NHFT 78 s (range 29-223 s) ( p  = .005). NHFT prolonged the BH duration by a mean factor of 2.1 (range 1.1-3.9s). The mean overall stability and reproducibility were within 1 mm. Subjective tolerance was very good with the majority of patients having no or minor discomfort caused by the devices. The mean inter-fraction tumor position variability was 1.8 mm (-1.1-8.1 mm;SD 2.4 mm)., Conclusion: NHFT for RT treatment of NSCLC in BH is feasible, well tolerated and significantly increases the breath-hold duration. Visually guided BH with OST is stable and reproducible. We therefore consider this an attractive patient-friendly approach to treat lung cancer patients with RT in BH.

Background and Purpose: In radiotherapy, automatic organ-at-risk segmentation algorithms allow faster delineation times, but clinically relevant contour evaluation remains challenging. Commonly used measures to assess automatic contours, such as volumetric Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) or Hausdorff distance, have shown to be good measures for geometric similarity, but do not always correlate with clinical applicability of the contours, or time needed to adjust them. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of new and commonly used evaluation measures with time-saving during contouring., Materials and Methods: Twenty lung cancer patients were used to compare user-adjustments after atlas-based and deep-learning contouring with manual contouring. The absolute time needed (s) of adjusting the auto-contour compared to manual contouring was recorded, from this relative time-saving (%) was calculated. New evaluation measures (surface DSC and added path length, APL) and conventional evaluation measures (volumetric DSC and Hausdorff distance) were correlated with time-recordings and time-savings, quantified with the Pearson correlation coefficient, R., Results: The highest correlation (R = 0.87) was found between APL and absolute adaption time. Lower correlations were found for APL with relative time-saving (R = -0.38), for surface DSC with absolute adaption time (R = -0.69) and relative time-saving (R = 0.57). Volumetric DSC and Hausdorff distance also showed lower correlation coefficients for absolute adaptation time (R = -0.32 and 0.64, respectively) and relative time-saving (R = 0.44 and -0.64, respectively)., Conclusion: Surface DSC and APL are better indicators for contour adaptation time and time-saving when using auto-segmentation and provide more clinically relevant and better quantitative measures for automatically-generated contour quality, compared to commonly-used geometry-based measures., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2019 The Authors.)