Search

IntroductionThere is an unmet need for biomarkers to identify patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Increasing evidence suggest the presence of autoantibodies in a subset of axSpA patients. The aim of this study was to identify novel IgA antibodies in early axSpA patients and to determine their diagnostic potential in combination with previously determined IgG antibodies against UH (Hasselt University)-axSpA-IgG antigens. MethodsAn axSpA cDNA phage display library constructed from axSpA hip synovium, was used to screen for novel IgA antibodies in plasma from early axSpA patients. The presence of these antibodies against novel UH-axSpA-IgA antigens was determined in two independent axSpA cohorts, in healthy controls and in patients with chronic low back pain. ResultsWe identified antibodies to 7 novel UH-axSpA-IgA antigens, of which 6 correspond to non-physiological peptides and 1 to the human histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) protein. IgA antibodies against 2 of these 7 novel UH-axSpA-IgA antigens and IgG antibodies against 2 of the previously identified antigens were significantly more present in early axSpA patients from the UH cohort (18/70, 25.7%) and the (Bio)SPAR cohort (26/164, 15.9%), compared to controls with chronic low back pain (2/66, 3%). Antibodies to this panel of 4 antigens were present in 21.1% (30/142) of patients with early axSpA from the UH and (Bio)SPAR cohorts. The positive likelihood ratio for confirming early axSpA using antibodies to these 4 UH-axSpA antigens was 7.0. So far, no clinical correlation between the novel identified IgA antibodies and inflammatory bowel disease could be identified. DiscussionIn conclusion, screening an axSpA cDNA phage display library for IgA reactivity resulted in the identification of 7 novel UH-axSpA-IgA antigens, of which 2 show promising biomarker potential for the diagnosis of a subset of axSpA patients, in combination with previously identified UH-axSpA-IgG antigens. This study was supported by a grant from the Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology We thank the University Biobank Limburg and the Biobank of University Hospitals Leuven for providing the tissue samples, plasma/serum samples, and clinical characteristics of axial SpA patients and controls; Igna Rutten and Josianne Bleus (UHasselt, Biomedical Research Institute, Department of Immunology and Infection) for their excellent technical support.

ObjectivesTo investigate whether MTX should be combined with an additional DMARD and bridging glucocorticoids as initial treatment for patients with early RA to induce an effective long-term response.MethodsThe Care in early RA study is a two-year investigator-initiated pragmatic multicentre randomized trial. Early RA patients, naïve to DMARDs and glucocorticoids, were stratified based on prognostic factors. High-risk patients were randomized to COBRA-Classic (n = 98): MTX, sulfasalazine, prednisone step-down from 60 mg; COBRA-Slim (n = 98): MTX, prednisone step-down from 30 mg; or COBRA-Avant-Garde (n = 93): MTX, leflunomide, prednisone step-down from 30 mg. Low-risk patients were randomized to COBRA-Slim (n = 43); or Tight Step Up (TSU) (n = 47): MTX without prednisone. Clinical/radiological outcomes at year 2, sustainability of response, safety and treatment adaptations were assessed.ResultsIn the high-risk group 71/98 (72%) patients achieved a DAS28-CRP < 2.6 with COBRA-Slim compared with 64/98 (65%) with COBRA-Classic and 69/93 (74%) with COBRA-Avant-Garde (P = 1.00). Other clinical/radiological outcomes and sustainability of response were similar. COBRA-Slim treatment resulted in less therapy-related adverse events compared with COBRA-Classic (P = 0.02) or COBRA-Avant-Garde (P = 0.005). In the low-risk group, 29/43 (67%) patients on COBRA-Slim and 34/47 (72%) on TSU achieved a DAS28-CRP < 2.6 (P = 1.00). On COBRA-Slim, low-risk patients had lower longitudinal DAS28-CRP scores over 2 years, a lower need for glucocorticoid injections and a comparable safety profile compared with TSU.ConclusionAll regimens combining DMARDs with glucocorticoids were effective for patients with early RA up to 2 years. The COBRA-Slim regimen, MTX monotherapy with glucocorticoid bridging, provided the best balance between efficacy and safety, irrespective of patients’ prognosis.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01172639.

The key to successful management of spondyloarthritis (SpA) is early objective quantication of inammation and ongoing precise, tailored therapy to ensure long term suppression of inammatory disease activity (Brown).

International research indicates that two to fifteen per cent of teachers perform below standard. These underperforming teachers can have a profound negative impact on their students and schools. As teamwork is indispensable in today's education, co-workers are important stakeholders to include in research on teacher underperformance. With this study, we aim to raise awareness of the experiences of co-worker underperformance, impact on co-workers, and how co-workers perceive their role in responding. The findings of our survey study in primary and secondary schools indicate that the majority of Flemish teachers has recently encountered incidents of teacher underperformance in their teams. This concerns very diverse types of underperformance, including student-related and team-related types. Often, the underperformance is perceived as severe, long-lasting, and having internal causes, and impacting on team members and the team work. Flemish teachers are not convinced they are responsible or authorised to respond to the underperformance or convinced that responding would be useful. Our results also indicate that confrontation and support/advice are the least common co-worker responses. Teachers perceive 'tolerance' as the most common principal response. These findings raise important questions about the role of co-workers in dealing with teacher underperformance and highlight the need to pay attention to these co-workers when studying or addressing teacher underperformance.

Introduction Considering a lack of efficacy data in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (eRA) presenting without classical markers of poor prognosis, we compared methotrexate (MTX) with or without step-down glucocorticoids in the CareRA trial. Methods Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–naïve patients with eRA were stratified into a low-risk group based on prognostic markers that included non-erosiveness, anti–citrullinated protein antibodies and rheumatoid factor negativity and low disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)) ≤3.2). Patients were randomized to 15 mg of MTX weekly (MTX with tight step-up (MTX-TSU)) or 15 mg of MTX weekly with prednisone bridging, starting at 30 mg and tapered to 5 mg daily from week 6 (COmbinatie therapie bij Reumatoïde Artritis (COBRA Slim)). A TSU approach was applied. Outcomes assessed were DAS28(CRP)-determined remission, cumulative disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores and adverse events (AEs) after 16 treatment weeks. Results We analyzed 43 COBRA Slim and 47 MTX-TSU patients and found that 65.1% in the COBRA Slim group and 46.8% in the MTX-TSU group reached remission (P = 0.081). Mean ± standard deviation area under the curve values of DAS28(CRP) were 13.84 ± 4.58 and 11.18 ± 4.25 for the MTX-TSU and COBRA Slim patients, respectively (P = 0.006). More COBRA Slim patients had an HAQ score of 0 (51.2% versus 23.4%, P = 0.006) at week 16. Therapy-related AEs between groups did not differ. Conclusion In patients with low-risk eRA, MTX with step-down glucocorticoid bridging seems more efficacious than MTX step-up monotherapy, with a comparable number of AEs observed over the first 16 treatment weeks. Trial registration EU Clinical Trials Register Identifier: EudraCT number 2008-007225-39. Registered 5 November 2008. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0611-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.