Search

BACKGROUND: To date, there is no commercially available vaccine to prevent infectious mononucleosis, a disease frequently induced by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in adolescents or adults devoid of preexisting immunity to the virus. METHODS: A total of 181 EBV-seronegative, healthy, young adult volunteers were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either placebo or a recombinant EBV subunit glycoprotein 350 (gp350)/aluminum hydroxide and 3-O-desacyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A (AS04) candidate vaccine in a 3-dose regimen. RESULTS: The vaccine had demonstrable efficacy (mean efficacy rate, 78.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.0%-96.0%]) in preventing the development of infectious mononucleosis induced by EBV infection, but it had no efficacy in preventing asymptomatic EBV infection. One month after receipt of the final dose of gp350 vaccine, 98.7% of subjects showed seroconversion to anti-gp350 antibodies (95% CI, 85.5%-97.9%), and they remained anti-gp350 antibody positive for >18 months. Furthermore, there were no concerns regarding the safety or reactogenicity of the gp350/AS04 vaccine. CONCLUSION: These data support the clinical feasibility of using an EBV vaccine to prevent infectious mononucleosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00430534. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study attempted to (1) determine the prevalence of alcohol problems in college freshmen, (2) assess the performance of both the CAGE and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaires in this population, and (3) assess the possibility of improving the CAGE and/or AUDIT. Methods: A sample of 3564 consecutive college freshmen, with a mean age of 18 years, at the Catholic University of Leuven, (Belgium) completed, during a cross-sectional study, a questionnaire assessing drinking behavior and identifying students at risk as defined by DSM-IV criteria. The questionnaire also included the CAGE questionnaire and the AUDIT. Calculations of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves for different scores of the CAGE and the AUDIT were performed, using DSM-IV criteria as the reference standard. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CAGE and the AUDIT was 0.76 and 0.85, respectively. The cutoff score of 1 for the CAGE was associated with a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 87%, a positive predictive value of 36%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. A score of 6 or more for the AUDIT gave a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 78%, a positive predictive value of 37%, and a negative predictive value of 77%. These results were related with a prevalence of 14.1% of alcohol problems. Replacing one question of the CAGE by 'often driving under the influence' resulted in the CUGE (acronym for 'cut down, under influence, guilty feelings, and eye opener'), with an area under the curve of 0.96, a positive likelihood ratio of 8.7, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.04. Conclusions: Prevalence of alcohol problems in college students is confirmed to be high. When screening for alcohol problems in a college freshmen population, one question seems extremely important. The newly constructed CUGE questionnaire may improve screening efforts in students, compared with existing questionnaires. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to measure the coverage and influencing determinants of hepatitis B virus, measles-mumps-rubella, and Meningococcus serogroup C vaccination in 14-year-old adolescents in Flanders, Belgium, in 2005. METHODS: A total of 1500 adolescents who were born in 1991 and were living in Flanders were selected with a 2-stage cluster sampling technique. Home visits to copy vaccination documents and complete a questionnaire on sociodemographic and other related factors were conducted by trained interviewers. Only documented vaccination dates were accepted. Missing data were, when possible, retrieved through medical charts of the School Health System. RESULTS: For 1344 (89.6%) adolescents, a home visit was performed. Vaccination coverage was 75.7% for the third dose of hepatitis B virus, 80.6% for the first dose and 83.6% for the second dose of measles-mumps-rubella, and 79.8% for Meningococcus serogroup C. Only 74.6% of the adolescents had proof of 2 measles-mumps-rubella vaccines. Although 1006 (74.8%) adolescents had vaccination data available at home at the time of the interview, only 427 (31.8%) were able to show written proof of all studied vaccines. The probably underestimated coverage rates are well below World Health Organization recommendations, but timeliness of vaccinations was respected. Univariate logistic regression showed that unemployment of the father as proxy measure of socioeconomic status was detrimental for vaccination status, in contrast to partial employment of the mother, which was a favorable factor. Previously unreported determinants of lower coverage rates inferred from this study are single divorced parents, larger families (> or = 4 children), lower adolescent educational level, enrollment in special education, and repeating a grade. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient documentation is a major barrier in this vaccination coverage study. More attention should go to those with the lowest coverage rates, such as adolescents from large families, with separated parents, and with a lower socioeconomic background. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) is approved in adults aged ≥60 years. We evaluated RSVPreF3 OA immunogenicity and safety in adults aged 50-59 years without or with increased risk for RSV disease due to specific chronic medical conditions., Methods: This observer-blind, phase 3, noninferiority trial included adults aged 50-59 years, stratified into 2 subcohorts: those with and those without predefined, stable, chronic medical conditions leading to an increased risk for RSV disease. Participants in both subcohorts were randomized 2:1 to receive RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. A control group of adults aged ≥60 years received RSVPreF3 OA. Primary outcomes were RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers (geometric mean titer ratios and sero-response rate differences) 1 month post-vaccination in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds. Cell-mediated immunity and safety were also assessed., Results: The exposed population included 1152 participants aged 50-59 years and 381 participants aged ≥60 years. RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds; noninferiority criteria were met for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers in those with and those without increased risk for RSV disease. Frequencies of RSVPreF3-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells increased substantially from pre- to 1 month post-vaccination. Most solicited adverse events had mild-to-moderate intensity and were transient. Unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were similar in all groups., Conclusions: RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds compared to ≥60-year-olds, in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated. The safety profile in 50-59-year-olds was consistent with that in ≥60-year-olds., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05590403., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . H. A. H., M. d. H., B. S., S. D., M.-P. D., D. D., J. H., C. V., and V. H. are/were GSK employees at the time when the study was designed and/or conducted. H. A. H., M. d. H., B. S., S. D., M.-P. D., D. D., J. H., and V. H. hold shares in GSK as part of their employee remuneration. M.-P. D. is a co-applicant on a pending patent filed by GSK. M. F. received study-related payments for training and study conduct from GSK. T. F. S. received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Biogen, CSL-Seqirus, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Merck-Serono, Moderna, Novavax, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda; he participated on advisory boards for Bavarian Nordic, CSL-Seqirus, BioNTech, GSK, Moderna, Novavax, and Takeda. S. A. N. declares study-related payments to his institution from GSK and support from GSK to attend investigators meetings. J. R.-G. declares study-related payments from GSK and honoraria and support for attending meetings and/or travel from GSK, Pfizer, and Sanofi-MSD; he also participated on data and safety monitoring boards or advisory boards from GSK and Pfizer. C. Z. received grants from GSK for the conduct of this study and support from GSK for attending meetings. J. G. declares study-related payments from GSK; grants from Novartis, Pharmalog, New Amsterdam Pharma, Syneos, Winecker Pharma, and Lilly; and consulting fees, honoraria, payment for expert testimony, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from GSK. C. V.-P. is a former employee of QPS Netherlands B.V. The other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: In the previous (parent) study, 2 doses of different formulations of an investigational vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus (RSVPreF3 OA) were well tolerated and immunogenic in older adults. This multicenter phase 2b extension study assessed safety and immunogenicity of a revaccination (third) dose of the 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E formulation., Methods: In total, 122 older adults (60-80 years), previously vaccinated with 2 doses of RSVPreF3-AS01E formulations (containing 30, 60, or 120 μg RSVPreF3 antigen), received an additional 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E dose 18 months after dose 2. Vaccine safety was evaluated in all participants up to 6 months and immunogenicity in participants who received 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E doses until 1 month after dose 3., Results: Similar to the parent study, mostly mild-to-moderate solicited adverse events and no vaccine-related serious adverse events or potential immune-mediated disorders were reported. Neutralizing titers and cell-mediated immune responses persisted for 18 months after 2-dose vaccination. Dose 3 increased RSV-specific neutralizing titers against RSV-A and RSV-B and median CD4+ T-cell frequencies. After dose 3, RSV-specific neutralizing titers but not CD4+ T-cell frequencies were below levels detected 1 month after dose 1., Conclusions: Revaccination with 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E 18 months after dose 2 is well tolerated and immunogenic in older adults., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04657198; EudraCT, 2020-000692-21., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. I. L. R. reports funding from Icosavax and Virometix to her institution for the conduct of RSV vaccine trials, and from GSK to her institution for conduct of this clinical trial. M. V. R. reports GSK funding to the Leuven University Vaccinology Center for the conduct of the clinical trial. C. Vm. reports GSK funding to her institution for the conduct of the clinical trial as at the time of the execution of the clinical trial she was an investigator; C. Vm. joined GSK after the close of the study at her institution and is currently an employee of GSK; however, she does not hold any shares. C. V. A., N. D. S., B. S., C. V., M. P. D., S. K., and V. H. were employees of GSK at the time of the study conduct. N. D. S., B. S., M. P. D., C. V., S. K., and V. H. hold shares from GSK as part of their past/current employee remuneration. All current/previous employees of GSK declare financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate safety and immunogenicity of vaccine formulations against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) containing the stabilized prefusion conformation of RSV fusion protein (RSVPreF3)., Methods: This phase 1/2, randomized controlled, observer-blind study enrolled 48 young adults (YAs; aged 18-40 years) and 1005 older adults (OAs; aged 60-80 years) between January and August 2019. Participants were randomized into equally sized groups to receive 2 doses of unadjuvanted (YAs and OAs) or AS01-adjuvanted (OAs) vaccine or placebo 2 months apart. Vaccine safety and immunogenicity were assessed until 1 month (YAs) or 12 months (OAs) after second vaccination., Results: The RSVPreF3 vaccines boosted humoral (RSVPreF3-specific immunoglobulin G [IgG] and RSV-A neutralizing antibody) responses, which increased in an antigen concentration-dependent manner and were highest after dose 1. Compared to prevaccination, the geometric mean frequencies of polyfunctional CD4+ T cells increased after each dose and were significantly higher in adjuvanted than unadjuvanted vaccinees. Postvaccination immune responses persisted until end of follow-up. Solicited adverse events were mostly mild to moderate and transient. Despite a higher observed reactogenicity of AS01-containing vaccines, no safety concerns were identified for any assessed formulation., Conclusions: Based on safety and immunogenicity profiles, the AS01E-adjuvanted vaccine containing 120 μg of RSVPreF3 was selected for further clinical development., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03814590., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. D. C., M.-P. D., M. d. H., N. D. S., N. D., L. F., V. H., J. K., N. M., B. S., F. S., J. T., C. V. A., and C. Ve. are/were employees of the GSK group of companies at the time of the study conduct. C. Va. is currently an employee of the GSK group of companies. D. C., M.-P. D., M. d. H., N. D. S., N. D., B. S., F. S., and C. Ve. hold shares from the GSK group of companies as part of their past/current employee remuneration. F. S. is currently an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson and holds restricted shares from Johnson & Johnson as part of his employee remuneration. All current/previous employees of the GSK groups of companies declare financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities. C. P. A., E. K., I. L.-R., K. S., and C. Va. report grant/research support from the GSK group of companies to their institution for study conduct and, except for C. Va., they have no nonfinancial relationships and activities to declare. E. K. has served as consultant, in advisory boards, in speaker’s bureaus, or received travel reimbursement from Amphastar, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Forest, Cipla, Chiesi, GSK, Mylan, Novartis, Sunovion, Teva, Pearl Pharmaceuticals, and Theravance. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Data on respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease burden in adults remain scarce. We assessed the burden of confirmed RSV-acute respiratory infections (cRSV-ARIs) in community-dwelling (CD) adults and those in long-term care facilities (LTCFs)., Methods: In this prospective cohort study covering 2 RSV seasons (October 2019-March 2020 and October 2020-June 2021), RSV-ARIs were identified through active surveillance, in medically stable CD-adults ≥50 years (Europe) or adults ≥65 years in LTCFs (Europe and the United States). RSV infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction from combined nasal and throat swabs., Results: Of 1981 adults enrolled, 1251 adults in CD and 664 LTCFs (season 1) and 1223 adults in CD and 494 LTCFs (season 2) were included in the analyses. During season 1, overall incidence rates ([IRs] cases/1000 person-years) and attack rates (ARs) for cRSV-ARIs were 37.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.62-61.35) and 1.84% in adults in CD and 47.85 (CI, 22.58-101.4) and 2.26% in adults in LTCFs. Complications occurred for 17.4% (CD) and 13.3% (LTCFs) of cRSV-ARIs. One cRSV-ARI occurred in season 2 (IR = 2.91 [CI, 0.40-20.97]; AR = 0.20%), without complications. No cRSV-ARIs led to hospitalization or death. Viral pathogens were codetected in ≤17.4% of cRSV-ARIs., Conclusions: RSV is an important cause of disease burden in adults in CD and LTCFs. Despite the observed low severity of cRSV-ARI, our results support the need for RSV prevention strategies among adults ≥50 years old., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. RD, SD, J-YP, and DL are employees of the GSK group of companies. SD, J-YP, and DL hold shares in the GSK group of companies as part of their employee remuneration. JMRT declares lectures for Pfizer and attending meetings for GSK and Pfizer. IL-R declares funding from GSK, ICOSAVAX, and Virometix to her institution for conducting RSV clinical trials and participation on Janssen advisory boards for RSV vaccines. CV reports grant/research support from GSK to her institution for the conduct of the current study and is currently an employee of the GSK group of companies. KS, JSTB, and LLH declares research funding received by their institution from GSK. RGF declares lectures for GSK. SM works as a freelance consultant on behalf of the GSK group of companies. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Objectives: Currently existing pneumococcal vaccines have contributed to a major reduction in pneumococcal disease. However, there remains an unmet need for vaccine coverage of serotypes not included in PCV13 to further reduce the burden of disease. The objective of this review is to assess the potential impact of implementation of the investigational 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) in the childhood and adult immunization programme in Belgium and Europe., Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify publications and surveillance reports concerning the effectiveness and safety of pneumococcal vaccines, epidemiological data on pneumococcal disease or serotype distribution dynamics after introduction of systematic vaccination., Results: Serotypes included in PCV20 currently account for the majority of pneumococcal disease in Belgium and Europe. In Belgium, PCV20-serotypes accounted for 71.4% of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) cases across all age groups in 2019, of which 39.2% were caused by PCV20-non-PCV13-serotypes. In Europe, these seven serotypes accounted for 37,6% of IPD cases in 2018.  PCV20 has proven to be well tolerated in vaccine-naïve adults and elicits a substantial immune response against all serotypes included., Conclusion: Due to serotype replacement following the introduction of PCV7 and PCV13, a considerable proportion of pneumococcal disease is currently caused by PCV20-serotypes. PCV20 has the potential of preventing more pneumococcal disease in children and the adult population at risk than the existing conjugate vaccines. The available evidence on safety and immunogenicity of PCV20 is promising, but further research is needed to provide data about vaccine effectiveness, immune response duration and replacement phenomenon after introduction of PCV20.

Background: The development of technological applications in clinical research, such as electronic informed consent (eIC), is on the rise. The involvement of end users throughout the design process of eIC is of utmost importance to improve the current informed consent process., Methods: Using a provocative design, we conducted interviews with 30 clinical research participants. Provotypes were used as a starting base to discuss various aspects relevant to eIC. By providing a medium to encourage divergent thinking, participants' views and concerns were solicited. Thematic analysis was undertaken using NVivo., Results: The majority of participants placed trust in the principal investigator or the hospital to perform the role of eIC hosting party. Differing opinions were reported on the amount of information required related to stakeholders' access to an eIC system, and thus, to participants' personal data, to enable trust in an eIC system. Nevertheless, this study indicates a general willingness of participants to share personal data with physicians and pharmaceutical companies on an international level, and to receive requests for new research studies via an eIC system. Participants suggested to tailor an eIC system based upon their preferences, for example, regarding whom they want to share their personal data with. Moreover, they expressed a desire to choose how they can contact the research team, and to indicate which study-related information they would like to receive electronically. In addition, positive opinions were voiced on the integration of a test to assess participants' understanding before providing their eIC., Conclusions: Following a research through design approach, insights have been generated which inform the design of eIC. Provotypes were designed to help participants think beyond what is familiar to them. Study findings revealed that not all situations were perceived as provocative, because of participants' motivation to advance scientific research and the trust they place in the research team. Nevertheless, the use of provocative design resulted in additional insights, generated by clinical research participants, which could be considered in the further design of eIC., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Governments regularly have to decide whether new vaccines should be adopted in their national immunization program. These choices imply complex trade-offs of epidemiological, medical and socio-economic criteria. We investigated how the population in Flanders (Belgium) wants their government to set vaccine-funding priorities. In December 2019, we executed a discrete choice experiment in a sample of the Flemish population (N = 1636). In total, we analysed 16 360 choices between vaccines competing for funding, described in terms of eight characteristics. Using a panel mixed logit model, we quantified the relative importance of each characteristic and investigated differences in preferences across respondent groups. The observed vaccine priorities were different from those that would be identified through cost-effectiveness analysis. People valued the health impact from infectious diseases differently than their weight expressed in QALYs would suggest. Mortality and frequently occurring mild illness were valued higher, whereas lasting morbidity received lower weight. Contribution of the vaccine to disease eradication and uncertainty in vaccine effectiveness were both highly influential factors. Health equity impact was also important whereas the economic impact of the disease did not matter at all. Our results can be used to incorporate public values into vaccine decision-making., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the framework of new legislation on School Health Services (SHS) in Flanders (Belgium), nurses lead a preventive consultation with every three-year-old child and its parent(s), with the aim of assessing risks in child development and potential parenting problems. This study assesses the feasibility of the "Structured Problem Analysis of Raising kids aged 36 months" (SPARK36), a broad-scope structured interview to facilitate such consultations., Design and Methods: A feasibility study was conducted with SHS nurses across Flanders, to determine need for this instrument, acceptability and practical feasibility of SPARK36 with both parents and professionals. Nurses were trained to use the instrument. Mixed methods (i.e., questionnaires for both parents and nurses, and a focus group interview with nurses) were used to evaluate the feasibility of using SPARK36., Results: Parents were satisfied (97.0%) with what was discussed during the consultation and with the consultation's structure (98.8%). After the training, all 20 nurses felt strengthened in performing the consultation and in making a risk assessment. The interview was feasible in 20-30 min. During 561 interviews nurses gave parenting support in 88.2% of cases., Conclusions: SPARK36 is acceptable, practically feasible for parents and nurses, and it meets needs of both parties. The instrument supports nurses during their consultation. More research is needed to evaluate the instrument and to prepare its implementation in daily practice., Practice Implications: SPARK36 is a promising instrument for nurse-led consultations in the SHS setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite the increasing importance of teamwork in healthcare, medical education still puts great emphasis on individual achievements. The purpose of this study is to examine medical students' team role preferences, including the association with gender and specialty; and to provide implications for policy makers and medical educators., Methods: We used an exploratory methodology, following a cross-sectional design. Data was collected from first year master students in medicine (n = 2293) during five consecutive years (2016-2020). The Belbin Team Role Self Perception Inventory (BTRSPI) was used to measure medical students' self-perceptions of their team role., Results: The Team Worker was the most preferred team role among medical students (35.8%), regardless of gender or specialty. Female and male students had similar team role patterns, although female students scored higher on Team Worker (40.4% vs. 29.1%, P < .001) and Completer-Finisher (14.0% vs. 8.0%, P < .001). With regard to specialties, the Team Worker role was more often chosen by general practitioners than by person-centered and technique-oriented specialties (47.1% vs. 41.8% vs. 29.1%, P < .001)., Conclusions: Our findings contribute to an increased scientific understanding of how medical students perceive their own team role, and how this is related to gender and specialty. This is valuable due to the increased importance of interdisciplinary teamwork in healthcare. Medical schools should prioritize stimulating teamwork skills through the implementation of different interventions at all stages (i.e. from the admission process to curricula to residency) and all levels (i.e. explicit and implicit curricula)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

It is not yet clear to what extent SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in children reflect community transmission, nor whether infection rates differ between primary schoolchildren and young teenagers. A cross-sectional serosurvey compared the SARS-CoV2 attack-rate in a sample of 362 children recruited from September 21 to October 6, 2020, in primary (ages 6-12) or lower secondary school (ages 12-15) in a municipality with low community transmission (Pelt) to a municipality with high community transmission (Alken) in Belgium. Children were equally distributed over grades and regions. Blood samples were tested for the presence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We found anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 4.4% of children in the low transmission region and in 14.4% of children in the high transmission region. None of the primary schoolchildren were seropositive in the low transmission region, whereas the seroprevalence among primary and secondary schoolchildren did not differ significantly in the high transmission region. None of the seropositive children suffered from severe disease. Children who were in contact with a confirmed case (RR 2.9; 95%CI 1.6-4.5), who participated in extracurricular activities (RR 5.6; 95%CI 1.2-25.3), or whose caregiver is a healthcare worker who had contact with COVID-19 patients (RR 2.2; 95%CI 1.0-4.6) were at higher risk of seropositivity. If SARS-CoV2 circulation in the community is high, this will be reflected in the pediatric population with similar infection rates in children aged 6-12 years and 12-15 years. What is Known: •Children are generally less affected by COVID-19 than adults but SARS-CoV2 infection rates among children are not well known. •There were large regional differences in infection rates during the first wave of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. What is New: •None of the primary schoolchildren (6-12 years) were seropositive for SARS-CoV2 in an area with a low community transmission, but infection rates were higher in adolescents (12-15 years). •In an area with high community transmission, seroprevalence rates in younger children were more comparable to those in adolescents., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: CG, KP, SD, TK, TN, CVR, LWH report a grant from Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO- Research Foundation – Flanders), to conduct social listening of vaccine concerns in Belgium. CS reports a grant from Johnson & Johnson and a grant from GSK on Research on Vaccine hesitance in different European countries. HL reports a grant from Merck on Research on Vaccine hesitancy among health care providers; from GSK on Research on Vaccine acceptance during pregnancy and honoraria for a training session; a grant from Astra Zeneca to run webinars with health care professionals on covid vaccination. CV; NV; TGV; AV have nothing to disclose.

A multicomponent vaccine has been developed to reduce the frequency of acute exacerbations of COPD associated with non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Moraxella catarrhalis (Mcat) infections, containing NTHi (PD and PE-PilA) and Mcat (UspA2) surface proteins. In a randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study with two steps (NCT02547974), the investigational vaccine had good immunogenicity and no safety concerns were identified. In step 2, 90 adults aged 50-71 years with smoking history received two doses 60 days apart of one of two AS01 E -adjuvanted formulations containing 10 µg of each antigen (10-10-AS01) or 10 µg NTHi antigens and 3.3 µg UspA2 (10-3-AS01), or placebo. Long-term persistence of antigen-specific humoral antibodies was assessed in 81 participants during 3 years of follow-up after the initial 14-month study (NCT03201211). Antigen-specific antibody concentrations were measured in blood samples taken every 6 months. Safety monitoring evaluated serious adverse events (SAEs) and potential immune-mediated disease (pIMD). Immune responses against NTHi antigens persisted up to 4 years post-vaccination. For PD, PE and PilA, at each follow-up time point, adjusted antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were higher (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) in the vaccine groups versus placebo and versus pre-vaccination. Antibody GMC point estimates were higher with 10-3-AS01 than with 10-10-AS01. For UspA2, 95% CIs included 1 for GMC ratios of 10-10-AS01 or 10-3-AS01 to placebo at each time point. During follow-up, SAEs were reported in nine (11.1%) participants, one of which was fatal (lung cancer, 607 days after second 10-10-AS01 dose). One non-serious pIMD, trigeminal neuralgia, was reported 771 days after second 10-3-AS01 dose. The SAEs and pIMD were considered not related to vaccination. Immune responses against NTHi antigens persisted for 4 years after two-dose vaccination with the investigational NTHi-Mcat vaccine. There was no persistent response against the Mcat antigen. No safety concerns were identified during the long-term follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: PDS declares no financial or non-financial relationships and activities and no conflicts of interest. GL-R reports a grant paid by the GSK group of companies for the conduct of this study and consulting fees paid by the GSK group of companies in the context of clinical trials conducted in general. CV reports a grant paid to her employer by the GSK group of companies during the conduct of this study, and grants paid to her employer by MSD and Pfizer outside the submitted work. AT, GDM, MD, DC, MA, DR and AKA are employees of the GSK group of companies. MD holds shares in the GSK group of companies and is married to an employee of the GSK group of companies who holds shares in it. GL-R, CV, AT, GDM, MD, DC, MA, DR and AKA declare no other financial or non-financial relationships and activities., (© 2021 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A.)

Objective: To investigate vaccine hesitancy leading to underimmunization and a measles outbreak in Rwanda and to develop a conceptual, community-level model of behavioural factors., Methods: Local immunization systems in two Rwandan communities (one recently experienced a measles outbreak) were explored using systems thinking, human-centred design and behavioural frameworks. Data were collected between 2018 and 2020 from: discussions with 11 vaccination service providers (i.e. hospital and health centre staff); interviews with 161 children's caregivers at health centres; and nine validation interviews with health centre staff. Factors influencing vaccine hesitancy were categorized using the 3Cs framework: confidence, complacency and convenience. A conceptual model of vaccine hesitancy mechanisms with feedback loops was developed., Findings: A comparison of service providers' and caregivers' perspectives in both rural and peri-urban settings showed that similar factors strengthened vaccine uptake: (i) high trust in vaccines and service providers based on personal relationships with health centre staff; (ii) the connecting role of community health workers; and (iii) a strong sense of community. Factors identified as increasing vaccine hesitancy (e.g. service accessibility and inadequate follow-up) differed between service providers and caregivers and between settings. The conceptual model could be used to explain drivers of the recent measles outbreak and to guide interventions designed to increase vaccine uptake., Conclusion: The application of behavioural frameworks and systems thinking revealed vaccine hesitancy mechanisms in Rwandan communities that demonstrate the interrelationship between immunization services and caregivers' vaccination behaviour. Confidence-building social structures and context-dependent challenges that affect vaccine uptake were also identified., ((c) 2021 The authors; licensee World Health Organization.)

Background: The currently licensed quadrivalent MenACWY-CRM conjugate vaccine presentation consists of two vials (lyophilised MenA and liquid MenCWY) to be reconstituted before injection. A new fully liquid formulation in a single vial has been developed to further improve the vaccine presentation. Since the MenA structure is subject to hydrolytic degradation, this study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety of the investigational MenACWY-CRM liquid vaccine with the licensed vaccine., Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, controlled, observer-blind, phase 2b study, 979 healthy adults were administered a single dose of MenACWY-CRM liquid presentation or the currently licensed MenACWY-CRM vaccine. MenA free saccharide generation was accelerated to approximately 30% in the liquid presentation and MenA polysaccharide O-acetylation was reduced to approximately 40%, according to a controlled procedure. Immunological non-inferiority of the MenACWY-CRM liquid to the licensed vaccine, as measured by human serum bactericidal assay (hSBA) geometric mean titres (GMTs) against MenA 1 month post-vaccination, was the primary study objective. Safety assessment was among the secondary objectives., Results: Immune responses against each serogroup were similar between the two vaccine groups and was non-inferior for MenA. Adjusted hSBA GMTs for MenA were 185.16 and 211.33 for the MenACWY-CRM liquid presentation and currently licensed vaccine presentation, respectively. The between-group ratio of hSBA GMTs for MenA was 0.88, with a two-sided 95% confidence interval lower limit of 0.64, greater than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 0.5, thus meeting the primary study objective. Both vaccines were well tolerated. No serious adverse events were considered related to vaccination., Conclusions: The levels of MenA free saccharide and polysaccharide O-acetylation did not affect the immunogenicity of the fully liquid presentation, which was demonstrated to be non-inferior to the immunogenicity of the currently licensed MenACWY-CRM vaccine against MenA. The immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety profiles of the two vaccine presentations were similar., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest TA, SVH, MA, BK, BdW, GFDD, MC, PVS, EF, ML and MP are employed by the GSK group of companies. TA, MA, BdW, PVS, EF, ML and MP hold shares in the GSK group of companies. CV reports her institution received payments from the GSK group of companies, MSD and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. ILR reports her institution received payments from the GSK group of companies for the conduct of the study. TN reports payments from the GSK group of companies, Merck, Sanofi Pasteur and Seqirus, outside the submitted work. TA, SVH, MA, BK, BdW, GFDD, MC, PVS, EF, ML, MP, CV, ILR and TN declare no other financial and non-financial relationships and activities. JV, TS, GG, MF, GI, TFS, AMN and SC declare no financial and non-financial relationships and activities and no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Viral infections are known to hijack the transcription and translation of the host cell. However, the extent to which viral proteins coordinate these perturbations remains unclear. Here we used a model system, the human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1), and systematically analyzed the transcriptome and interactome of key effectors oncoviral proteins Tax and HBZ. We showed that Tax and HBZ target distinct but also common transcription factors. Unexpectedly, we also uncovered a large set of interactions with RNA-binding proteins, including the U2 auxiliary factor large subunit (U2AF2), a key cellular regulator of pre-mRNA splicing. We discovered that Tax and HBZ perturb the splicing landscape by altering cassette exons in opposing manners, with Tax inducing exon inclusion while HBZ induces exon exclusion. Among Tax- and HBZ-dependent splicing changes, we identify events that are also altered in Adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) samples from two independent patient cohorts, and in well-known cancer census genes. Our interactome mapping approach, applicable to other viral oncogenes, has identified spliceosome perturbation as a novel mechanism coordinated by Tax and HBZ to reprogram the transcriptome., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Influenza vaccination is the most commonly recommended immune prevention strategy. However, data on influenza vaccination in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are scarce. In this study, our goals were to: (1) measure vaccination coverage rates (VCRs) for influenza in a large cohort of children, adolescents, and adults with CHD; (2) identify patient characteristics as predictors for vaccination; and (3) investigate the effect of influenza vaccination on hospitalization., Methods: A nationwide cohort study in Belgium included 16,778 patients, representing 134,782 vaccination years, from the Belgian Congenital Heart Disease Database Combining Administrative and Clinical Data (BELCODAC). Data over 9 vaccination years (2006-2015) were used, and patients were stratified into 5 age cohorts: 6 months to 4 years; 5-17 years; 18-49 years; 50-64 years; and 65 years and older., Results: In the respective age cohorts, the VCR was estimated to be 6.6%, 8.0%, 23.9%, 46.6%, and 72.8%. There was a steep increase in VCRs as of the age of 40 years. Multivariable logistic regression showed that higher anatomical complexity of CHD, older age, presence of genetic syndromes, and previous cardiac interventions were associated with significantly higher VCRs. Among adults, men had lower and pregnant women had higher VCRs. The association between influenza vaccination and all-cause hospitalization was not significant in this study., Conclusions: The influenza VCR in people with CHD is low, especially in children and adolescents. Older patients, particularly those with complex CHD, are well covered. Our findings should inform vaccination promotion strategies in populations with CHD., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The burden of human papillomavirus (HPV) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is high. Clinical trials on HPV vaccines in persons living with HIV and particularly in SOT recipients have been sparse to date, included low numbers of participants, and none of them assessed the 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine. We investigated the immunogenicity with respect to HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 and the safety of the 9vHPV vaccine in persons living with HIV and recipients of a kidney, lung, or heart transplant., Methods: This is a phase III investigator-initiated study in 100 persons living with HIV (age 18-45 years) and 171 SOT recipients (age 18-55 years). The 9vHPV vaccine was administered at day 1, month 2, and month 6. Primary outcome was seroconversion rates to the 9vHPV types at month 7. Secondary outcomes were geometric mean titers (GMTs) and frequency of adverse events (AEs)., Results: All HIV-infected participants seroconverted for all HPV types, but seroconversion ranged from 46% for HPV45 to 72% for HPV58 in SOT recipients. GMTs ranged from 180 to 2985 mMU/mL in HIV-positive participants and from 17 to 170 mMU/mL in SOT recipients, depending on the HPV type. Injection-site AEs occurred in 62% of participants but were mostly mild or moderate in intensity. None of the reported serious adverse events were deemed vaccine related. No patients died during the study., Conclusions: Immunogenicity of the 9vHPV vaccine is high in persons living with HIV but suboptimal in SOT recipients. The vaccine is safe and well tolerated in both groups., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Efficacy of the nine-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV; HPV types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) vaccine was demonstrated in a phase 3 study in women 16-26 years of age. We present a phase 3 immunogenicity and safety study of the 9vHPV vaccine in women 27-45 versus 16-26 years of age., Methods: This international, open-label study (NCT03158220) was conducted in women 16-45 years of age. Participants (16-26 years, n = 570 and 27-45 years, n = 642) received a three-dose 9vHPV vaccination regimen (day 1, month 2, month 6). Month 7 geometric mean titers (GMTs) and seroconversion percentages to anti-HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 were assessed. Participants were followed for safety throughout the study., Results: At month 7, anti-HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 GMTs in women 27-45 years were compared to those in women 16-26 years of age. The primary hypothesis of non-inferiority of anti-HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 GMTs in older versus younger women was met. The lower bound of the GMT ratio 95% confidence interval (27-45 years to 16-26 years) was 0.60-0.67 depending on HPV type, exceeding the non-inferiority margin of 0.5 for all HPV types. Month 7 seroconversion percentages in women 27-45 years of age were >99% for all HPV types. Injection-site and vaccine-related systemic adverse events (AEs) were observed in 87.5% and 25.1% of women 16-26 years, and 85.2% and 24.1% of women 27-45 years of age, respectively; no vaccine-related serious AEs were reported and no deaths occurred during the study., Conclusions: The 9vHPV vaccine elicited non-inferior anti-HPV GMTs in women 27-45 years compared with women 16-26 years of age for HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58. The vaccine was generally well tolerated with a similar AE profile across the age groups. These data support bridging 9vHPV vaccine efficacy findings in women 16-26 years to women 27-45 years of age. Clinical trial registration NCT03158220., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Elmar Joura reports grants from Merck during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Merck Sharpe & Dohme outside the submitted work. Angels Ulied reports personal fees through her institution from GSK, NUTRICIA, and MERK, outside the submitted work. Corinne Vandermeulen reports that her university received grants from GSK, Pfizer, and Merck for clinical studies for which she was principal investigator, and no personal grants. Milagrosa Rua Figueroa reports no conflicts of interest. Ilkka Seppä reports no conflicts of interest. Juan José Hernandez Aguado reports no conflicts of interest. Anitta Ahonen reports no conflicts of interest. Olaf Reich reports no conflicts of interest. Miia Virta reports no conflicts of interest. Antonino Perino reports grant and travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme. Merce Peris Tuser reports no conflicts of interest. Klaus Peters reports no conflicts of interest. Massimo Origoni reports no conflicts of interest. Francesco Raspagliesi reports grants from GSK, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, and Tesaro, outside the submitted work. Wiebren AA Tjalma reports no conflicts of interest. Philippe Tummers reports no conflicts of interest. Linn Woelber reports grants from Merck Sharpe & Dohme during the conduct of the study, grants and personal fees from Medac Oncology, personal fees from GSK, Jenapharm, Pfizer, Roche, Tesaro, and TEVA, and grants from Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. Pekka Nieminen reports no conflicts of interest. Pierre van Damme reports his university received grants from Merck Sharpe & Dohme for the conduct of this study, grants from GSK Biologicals, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Takeda, Baxter, CanSino China, Themis, Osivax, J&J, and Abbott, and grants from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH, Flemish Government, and European Union, outside the submitted work. Jalid Sehouli reports no conflicts of interest. Gabriel Fiol Ruiz reports no conflicts of interest. Sara Brucker reports no conflicts of interest. Tanja Fehm reports personal fees from Daichi Sankyo, Lilly, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and TEVA. Kyeongmi Cheon, Sonali Rawat, Alain Luxembourg, and Frederick Wittke are current or former employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and may own stock and/or stock options in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.]., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Seasonal influenza is an annually recurring threat to residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) since high age and chronic disease diminish immune response following vaccination. Although immunization of healthcare workers (HCWs) has proven to be an added value, coverage rates remain low. A ready-to-use instruction manual was designed to facilitate the implementation of interventions known to increase vaccination coverage in healthcare institutions. It includes easy-access vaccination, role model involvement, personalized promotional material, education and extensive communication. We evaluated this manual during the 2017-vaccination campaign in 11 LTCFs in Belgium. Vaccination coverage before and after the campaign was recorded by the LTCFs and the usefulness of the manual was assessed by interviewing the organizers of the local campaigns. Attitudes toward vaccination and reasons for vaccination were evaluated with a quantitative survey in HCWs before and after the campaign. The mean vaccination coverage reported by the LTCFs was 54% (range: 35-72%) in 2016 and 68% (range: 45-81%) in 2017. After the campaign, HCWs were less likely to expect side effects after influenza vaccination (OR (95%CI): 0.4 (0.2-0.9)) or to oppose vaccination (OR (95%CI): 0.3 (0.1-0.9)). The majority (>60%) indicated to be well informed about the risks of influenza and the efficacy of the vaccine. The main reason for vaccination in those who previously refused it was resident protection. The manual was found useful by the organizers of the campaigns. We conclude that the use of an intervention manual may support vaccination uptake and decrease perceived barriers toward influenza vaccination in countries without mandatory vaccination in HCWs.

The expanding pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires the development of safe, efficacious and fast-acting vaccines. Several vaccine platforms are being leveraged for a rapid emergency response 1 . Here we describe the development of a candidate vaccine (YF-S0) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that uses live-attenuated yellow fever 17D (YF17D) vaccine as a vector to express a noncleavable prefusion form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen. We assess vaccine safety, immunogenicity and efficacy in several animal models. YF-S0 has an excellent safety profile and induces high levels of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), mice (Mus musculus) and cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), and-concomitantly-protective immunity against yellow fever virus. Humoral immunity is complemented by a cellular immune response with favourable T helper 1 polarization, as profiled in mice. In a hamster model 2 and in macaques, YF-S0 prevents infection with SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, a single dose conferred protection from lung disease in most of the vaccinated hamsters within as little as 10 days. Taken together, the quality of the immune responses triggered and the rapid kinetics by which protective immunity can be attained after a single dose warrant further development of this potent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate.