Search

Virtual fencing (VF) has the capacity to transform the landscape of livestock management within extensive rangeland systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Vence (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ) VF technology on yearling steer behavior and performance. Steers were allocated into one of two grazing systems [continuous grazing (CG) or rotational grazing (RG) managed using VF] across three different stocking rates (light, moderate, and heavy, 0.32, 0.40, and 0.72 animal unit months, respectively) for three grazing seasons. Based on initial body weight, steers were randomly blocked into six pastures (346 ± 39, 273 ± 34, and 319 ± 29 kg, respectively) at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station (n = 127, 135, and 127, in 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively). Steers assigned to the CG treatment had free access to the entire pasture for the duration of the grazing season. Steers assigned to the RG treatment were rotated among virtual ‘paddocks’ for the duration of the grazing season. The days spent grazing in each paddock for the RG treatment were determined based on bi-weekly clip plots for biomass estimation. The VF collars were used to track steer location at 5-min intervals; only steers assigned to the RG treatment were managed with VF boundaries and exposed to auditory and electrical cues from the collars. Raw data was downloaded from Vence Herd Manager through an automatic programming interface and cleaned by removing messages that failed to transmit correctly or were outside the bounds of study site pastures. Animal behavior metrics of daily distance traveled (DDT), daily grazing time, daily resting time, and daily walking time were calculated for each individual animal and averaged by pasture using Program R. Steer weights were collected using SmartScales (C-Lock Inc, Rapid City, SD). Average daily gain (ADG) was calculated using a linear model to develop a regression equation for each individual animal using weight as the dependent variable and day of trial as the independent variable. The slope of the regression line was used to estimate ADG. Individual DDT, behavior, and performance metrics were analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the impact of grazing treatment and stocking rate (fixed effects) with year as the random effect. Treatment did not influence (P > 0.05) grazing, walking, or resting behavior. Similarly, no differences were detected in DDT between treatment groups or across different stocking rates. Furthermore, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in ADG across treatment groups. Implementation of VF had no impact on animal behavior or performance, justifying its use in grazing settings; however, financial and cattle finishing aspects still need to be evaluated to determine its overall benefits and costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Attaining sustainability of livestock production and understanding environmental synergies requires in-depth knowledge of grazing animal growth and behavior. A pilot study (2021-22) was conducted at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station as part of a broader project to evaluate precision livestock technology and environmental synergies on native rangelands. Yearling Angus steers (n = 262) were fitted with virtual fencing collars (Vence), weighed on a traditional chute scale, and allocated to one of six native grass pastures equipped with individual weighing (SmartScale) scales at the water source. Each pasture was assigned either Rotational (RG) or Continuous (CG) grazing strategy and one of three stocking rates (Low, Medium, and High, 0.3, 0.42, and 0.7 AUMs, respectively) in a 2x3 factorial design. The data were downloaded, (Rcore Team, 2023), and spurious weights identified and removed using Robust Regression (hwts > 0.99, Parsons et al. 2023). Effects of stocking rate and grazing strategy were analyzed on water visits, time spent drinking, and growth using a linear mixed effects model to calculate effect sizes. Differences between BW and ADG calculated using the smart-scale vs. traditional chute weights were evaluated using a paired t-test. Steers visited the smart-scale 3.44 ± 2.79 visits per day, with significant effect of RG vs. CG strategies (3.65 ± 0.09 vs. 2.89 ± 0.10 visits per day respectively, P < 0.05). Total water visit duration averaged 5.04 ± 7.58 minutes per day, with most visits occurring between 0600 and 2000 hours and no observations occurring between 2000 and 0000 hours. RG managed steers exhibited significantly higher water visit duration (5.28 ± 0.308 vs 4.16 ± 0.317 minutes/day, P < 0.05) compared with CG managed steers. Smartscale measured weights were significantly heavier than chute weights at the beginning and end of the study period, (7.47 ± 24.54 and 9.77 ± 46.25 kg respectively, P < 0.05). No differences in overall ADG were found between smartscale and traditional chute weights(P > 0.58), however, significant temporal interactions occurred (P < 0.05), which demonstrates that ADG varied over the trial duration. This created significant discrepancies in predicted vs. actual stocking rates in heavy stocked pastures (0.84 AUM, P < 0.05), indicating pastures exceeded their target stocking rate. Overall, we found steers readily acclimated to smart-scale weighing systems, and creates a viable technology to monitor watering behavior, real-time body weight, and ADG in extensively managed cattle. Further, we showed RG vs CG grazing strategies significantly affect animal drinking behavior, while stocking rate resulted in inequalities between expected vs. actual assigned animal unit months. Precision livestock technologies offer a vital solution towards enhancing sustainable livestock management practices and improving nutrition and modeling in extensive rangeland systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]