Search

Surgical and nonsurgical patients with isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS) were compared to determine the important factors contributing to the timing of surgical intervention. This study reviews 49 consecutive patients (27 surgical and 22 nonsurgical) aged 1.8 to 15.9 years with isolated SAS. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in surgical patients was significantly higher than the gradient in nonsurgical patients (59.0 +/- 30.4 vs 22.77 +/- 13.9 mm Hg, P = .0001). The progression in LVOT gradient analyzed by echo Doppler was significantly higher in the surgical group compared with the nonsurgical group (10.48 +/- 9.7 vs 1.56 +/- 6.5 mm Hg/y, P = .007). Repeat surgical intervention was required in 22% of patients in the surgical group for recurrence of SAS, and 4% needed a third surgery. The progression in the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) was not significantly different in the surgical and nonsurgical groups. There was a significant association between the development of AR and patients undergoing surgery (P = .045). AR may not be a reliable indication for early operative intervention in isolated SAS as there was no significant difference in its progression with surgical and nonsurgical patients. Asymptomatic patients with isolated SAS may warrant surgical intervention on the basis of progression of LVOT gradient, rather than the development or progression of AR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network (CANVAS) conducted active participant-based surveillance for adverse events following immunization during the COVID-19 vaccine campaign. This study evaluated the association between COVID-19 vaccination and neurological adverse events., Methods: Participants were invited to complete online surveys to report health events that prevented daily activities and/or required medical attention within 7 days after COVID-19 vaccination or 7 days prior to the survey (unvaccinated controls); follow-up surveys were sent 7 months later. Neurological events were health events where the most severe symptom reported was ≥1 of: numbness/tingling, loss of taste or smell, vision loss, facial weakness/paralysis, seizure, weakness/paralysis of arms or legs, confusion, change in personality or behavior, or difficulty with urination or defecation. Data were extracted from the CANVAS-COVID database for analysis., Results: Completed survey responses were received from 15,273 unvaccinated controls, 758,619 dose 1 recipients, 406,884 dose 2 recipients, and 126,586 dose 3 recipients. Rates of neurological events ranged from 15.9 (95 % CI 13.6-18.4) per 10,000 dose 1 ChAdOx1 recipients to 8.4 (6.5-10.8) and 7.9 (5.7-11.0) per 10,000 dose 3 mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 recipients, respectively. Multivariable regression adjusted for age, sex, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and baseline health status showed an increased risk of neurological event among ChAdOx1 dose 1 recipients versus controls (adjusted OR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.2-4.3), but not among mRNA vaccine recipients after any dose. Risk of anaesthesia/paresthesia were increased following ChAdOx1 dose 1 (aOR 4.7, 1.7-13.1), and consistently but not statistically significantly higher following any dose of either mRNA vaccine. Risk of loss of smell/taste was decreased among recipients of any dose of either mRNA vaccine versus controls., Conclusions: The results support the safety of COVID-19 vaccines while confirming reported associations between ChAdOx1 dose 1 and neurological events. Participant-based AEFI surveillance is a useful component of post-market surveillance programs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Julie A Bettinger reports financial support was provided by Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Julie A Bettinger reports financial support was provided by Public Health Agency of Canada. Manish Sadarangani reports financial support was provided by BC Children’s Hospital Foundation. Manish Sadarangani reports financial support was provided by Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. M Sadarangani, OG Vanderkooi, JE Isenor reports a relationship with GlaxoSmithKline Inc that includes: funding grants. M Sadarangani, OG Vanderkooi, JD Kellner reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc that includes: funding grants. M Sadarangani, JD Kellner reports a relationship with Moderna Inc that includes: funding grants. M Sadarangani, OG Vanderkooi, JD Kellner, L Valiquette reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc that includes: funding grants. M Sadarangani, JE Isenor reports a relationship with Sanofi Pasteur Inc that includes: funding grants. OG Vanderkooi reports a relationship with Seqirus Inc that includes: funding grants. A McGeer reports a relationship with GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi Pasteur Inc, Seqirus Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. A McGeer reports a relationship with Moderna Inc, AstraZeneca Canada Inc, Medicago Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. KA Top reports a relationship with Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network conducted a multi-center, prospective vaccine safety study to collect safety data after dose 1 and 2 of COVID-19 vaccines and follow up safety information 7 months after dose 1., Objective: This study aimed to describe and evaluate the recruitment methods used by CANVAS and the retention of participants by each modality., Methods: CANVAS deployed a multi-pronged recruitment approach to reach a larger sample, without in-person recruitment. Three primary recruitment strategies were used: passive recruitment, technology-assisted electronic invitation through the vaccine booking system (auto-invitation), or auto-registration through the vaccine registries (auto-enrollment)., Results: Between December 2020 and April 2022, approximately 1.3 million vaccinated adults either self-enrolled or were auto-enrolled in CANVAS, representing about 5% of the vaccinated adult Canadian population. Approximately 1 million participants were auto-enrolled, 300,000 were recruited by auto-invitation, and 5,000 via passive recruitment. Overall survey completion rates for dose 1, dose 2 and the 7-month follow-up surveys were 51.7% (681,198 of 1,318,838), 54.3% (369,552 of 681,198), and 66.4% (452,076 of 681,198), respectively. Completion rates were lower among auto-enrolled participants compared to passively recruited or auto-invited participants who self-enrolled. However, auto-enrolled samples were much larger, which offset the lower completion rates., Conclusion: Our data suggest that auto-enrollment provided an opportunity to reach and retain a larger number of individuals in the study compared to other recruitment modalities., Competing Interests: MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Pasteur outside the submitted work. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. LV reports grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. KT reports grants from the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations for COVID-19 vaccine studies. JI has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Pasteur outside the submitted work. All funds have been paid to her institute, and she has not received any personal payment. AM reports grants to her institution from Pfizer and Sanofi-Pasteur, and personal payments for consulting from AstraZeneca, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, and Seqirus. JK has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, and Pfizer, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Soe, Sadarangani, Naus, Muller, Vanderkooi, Kellner, Top, Wong, Isenor, Marty, De Serres, Valiquette, McGeer and Bettinger.)

This study examined short-to-medium term safety of COVID-19 vaccines among adults aged ≥65 years using the Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network active safety surveillance data. Both vaccinated and unvaccinated older adult participants recruited from seven provinces and territories were included in the analysis. Safety was assessed at 7 days after COVID-19 vaccination (dose 1, 2 and 3), and 7 months after dose 1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between BNT162b2/mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines and two short-term health events: 1) health event preventing daily activities and/or required medical consultation, 2) serious health events resulting in an emergency department visit and/or hospitalization within 7 days following each dose. We also assessed the rates of serious health events for the period between dose 1 and 2, and 7-months following dose 1. Between December 2020 and February 2022, a total of 173,038, 104,452, and 13,970 older adults completed dose 1, dose 2, and dose 3 surveys, respectively. The control survey was completed by 2,955 unvaccinated older adults. Health events occurred more frequently among recipients after dose 2 homologous mRNA-1273 (adjusted odds ratio [95 % confidence interval]: 2.91 [2.24-3.79]) and dose two heterologous (BNT162b2 followed by mRNA-1273): 1.50 [1.12-2.02] compared to unvaccinated counterparts. There was no difference in event rates after any dose of BNT162b2 and unvaccinated participants. The rates of serious health events following COVID-19 vaccination were very low (≤0.3 %) across all vaccine products and doses, and were not higher compared to unvaccinated controls, and were not associated with an emergency department visit or hospitalization within 7 days following vaccination. Reported symptoms were self-limited and rarely required medical assessment. Our findings further strengthen the current evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe and can be used to inform older adults about expected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Matthew P. Muller, Otto G. Vanderkooi, James D. Kellner, Karina A. Top, Manish Sadarangani, Jennifer E. Isenor, Gaston De Serres, Louis Valiquette, and Julie A. Bettinger reports financial support was provided by Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Matthew P. Muller, Otto G. Vanderkooi, James D. Kellner, Karina A. Top, Manish Sadarangani, Jennifer E. Isenor, Gaston De Serres, Louis Valiquette, and Julie A. Bettinger reports financial support was provided by Public Health Agency of Canada. Matthew P. Muller, Otto G. Vanderkooi, James D. Kellner, Karina A. Top, Manish Sadarangani, Jennifer E. Isenor, Gaston De Serres, Louis Valiquette, and Julie A. Bettinger reports financial support was provided by COVID-19 Immunity Task Force. PS, HW, MN, JAB, MPM, JDK, KM and OGV have no competing interests. MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines outside the submitted work. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. GDS and LV report grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. KAT reports grants from the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations for COVID-19 vaccine studies. JEI has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Pasteur outside the submitted work. All funds have been paid to her institute, and she has not received any personal payment. AM reports grants to her institution from Pfizer and Sanofi-Pasteur, and personal payments for consulting from AstraZeneca, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, and Seqirus., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: People with inflammatory or autoimmune diseases are recommended to continue immunomodulatory biologic agents throughout pregnancy. However, concerns regarding potential immunosuppression in infants exposed to biologic agents have led to recommendations to avoid live vaccines in the first 6-12 months of life. We aimed to examine whether live rotavirus vaccine could be administered safely to infants exposed to biologic agents, assessed in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network., Methods: In this prospective cohort study, infants exposed to biologic agents in utero were referred to one of six SIC sites in Canada for rotavirus vaccination recommendations. Children with other contraindications to rotavirus vaccination or older than 15 weeks were excluded. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were conducted according to a standard clinical pathway. Data were collected for relevant medical history, pregnancy outcomes, biologic agent exposure history, physical examination, laboratory results of the child, SIC recommendations for rotavirus vaccination, rotavirus vaccine series completion, and adverse events after immunisation. After parental consent, deidentified data were transferred to a central database for analysis. Children recommended for rotavirus vaccination were followed up for 8 months after series initiation to ascertain severe and serious adverse events, including severe diarrhoea, vomiting, and intussusception., Findings: Between May 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 2021, 202 infants were assessed and 191 eligible infants were enrolled (97 [51%] were female and 94 [49%] were male). When including those exposed to multiple agents, the most common biologic agents to which infants were exposed were infliximab (67 [35%] of 191), adalimumab (49 [26%]), ustekinumab (18 [9%]), and vedolizumab (17 [9%]). Biologic agent exposure continued into the third trimester for 178 (93%) infants. No clinically significant abnormalities in lymphocyte subsets, quantitative immunoglobulins, or mitogen responses were detected. After SIC assessment, rotavirus vaccination was recommended for 187 (98%) of 191 infants, all of whom were followed up. By end of follow-up on Aug 19, 2022, 168 (90%) infants had initiated rotavirus vaccination; 150 (80%) completed the series. No serious adverse events after immunisation were reported, but three (2%) infants required medical attention, one for vomiting and change in stools who was subsequently diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease, one for rash on labia unrelated to vaccination, and one for vomiting and diarrhoea associated with a milk allergy., Interpretation: Findings from this study suggest that lymphocyte subsets and the safety of live rotavirus vaccination are generally not affected by in-utero exposure to biologic agents. Rotavirus vaccination can be offered to infants exposed to anti-TNF agents in utero., Funding: Public Health Agency of Canada and Canadian Institutes of Health Research through the Canadian Immunization Research Network., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KAT receives grants from the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations; honorarium and travel support from Healio; and support for conference attendance from the Canadian Public Health Association. CC has been a co-investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Pfizer. MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo, and VBI Vaccines, for which payment has been received by his institute. SKM receives speaker fees from GlaxoSmithKline Canada and Johnson & Jonson China; has been on advisory boards for Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Merck; and is co-investigator on an investigator-led grant funded by Pfizer. CHS receives honoraria for participation in advisory boards and speaking fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Fresenius Kabi, and Bristol Myers Squibb. LM-F receives honoraria for participation in a data and safety monitoring committee from Encoded Therapeutics. P-PP-R has been a co-investigator on an investigator-led grant funded by Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Advances in diagnostic microbiology allow for the rapid identification of a broad range of enteropathogens; such knowledge can inform care and reduce testing. We conducted a randomized, unblinded trial in a tertiary-care pediatric emergency department. Participants had stool (and rectal swabs if stool was not immediately available) tested using routine microbiologic approaches or by use of a device (BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel), which identifies 22 pathogens with a 1-h instrument turnaround time. Participants were 6 months to <18.0 years and had acute bloody diarrhea. Primary outcome was performance of blood tests within 72 h. From 15 June 2018 through 7 May 2022, 60 children were randomized. Patients in the BioFire FilmArray arm had a reduced time to test result (median 3.0 h with interquartile range [IQR] of 3.0 to 4.0 h, versus 42.0 h (IQR 23.5 to 47.3 h); difference of -38.0 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] of -41.0 to -22.0 h). Sixty-five percent (20/31) of participants in the BioFire FilmArray group had a pathogen detected-most frequently enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (19%), Campylobacter (16%), and Salmonella (13%). Blood tests were performed in 52% of children in the BioFire FilmArray group and 62% in the standard-of-care group (difference of -10.5%, 95% CI of -35.4% to 14.5%). There were no between-group differences in the proportions of children administered intravenous fluids, antibiotics, hospitalized, or who had diagnostic imaging performed. Testing with the BioFire FilmArray reduced the time to result availability by 38 h. Although statistical significance was limited by study power, BioFire FilmArray use was not associated with clinically meaningful reductions in health care utilization or improved outcomes. IMPORTANCE Advances in diagnostic microbiology now allow for the faster and more accurate detection of an increasing number of pathogens. We determined, however, that in children with acute bloody diarrhea, these advances did not necessarily translate into improved clinical outcomes. While a greater number of pathogens was identified using a rapid turnaround multiplex stool diagnostic panel, with a reduction in the time to stool test result of over 1.5 days, this did not alter the practice of pediatric emergency medicine physicians, who continued to perform blood tests on a large proportion of children. While our conclusions may be limited by the relatively small sample size, targeted approaches that educate clinicians on the implementation of such technology into clinical care will be needed to optimize usage and maximize benefits., Competing Interests: The authors declare a conflict of interest. A BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel device was initially provided free of charge by bioMérieux. During the study period, a device was purchased for research purposes by the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute. All study test kits were purchased for usage.

Background: Adults previously infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) develop short-term immunity and may have increased reactogenicity to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This prospective, multicenter, active-surveillance cohort study examined the short-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines in adults with a prior history of SARS-CoV-2., Methods: Canadian adults vaccinated between 22 December 2020 and 27 November 2021 were sent an electronic questionnaire 7 days post-dose 1, dose 2, and dose 3 vaccination. The main outcome was health events occurring in the first 7 days after each vaccination that prevented daily activities, resulted in work absenteeism, or required a medical consultation, including hospitalization., Results: Among 684 998 vaccinated individuals, 2.6% (18 127/684 998) reported a prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infection a median of 4 (interquartile range: 2-6) months previously. After dose 1, individuals with moderate (bedridden) to severe (hospitalized) COVID-19 who received BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or ChAdox1-S vaccines had higher odds of a health event preventing daily activities, resulting in work absenteeism or requiring medical consultation (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.96 [3.67-4.28] for BNT162b2, 5.01 [4.57-5.50] for mRNA-1273, and 1.84 [1.54-2.20] for ChAdox1-S compared with no infection). Following dose 2 and 3, the greater risk associated with previous infection was also present but was attenuated compared with dose 1. For all doses, the association was lower or absent after mild or asymptomatic infection., Conclusions: Adults with moderate or severe previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to have a health event sufficient to impact routine activities or require medical assessment in the week following each vaccine dose., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. M. S. has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo, and VBI Vaccines, outside the submitted work. All funds have been paid to his institution, and he has not received any personal payments; he is also the Chair/Deputy Chair of 2 Data Safety and Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials, involving different vaccines. O. G. V. has been an investigator, coinvestigator, and/or expert panelist on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, and Seqirus, outside the submitted work, and reports grants or contracts from Pfizer Canada and a Pneumococcal Grant in AID (paid to their institution) and consulting fees from Merck, Pfizer, Seqirus, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi-Pasteur. J. D. K. has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work, and reports grants or contracts as Site Investigator for a phase 2/3, 2-part, open-label, dose-escalation, age de-escalation and randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled expansion study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, reactogenicity, and effectiveness of mRNA-1273 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in healthy children 6 months to less than 12 years of age (mRNA-1273-P204 Study; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04796896); a DSMB, VIDO (University of Saskatchewan Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization)–sponsored COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial, “A Randomized, Observer-Blind, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial of COVAC Vaccines in Healthy Adults” (unpaid volunteer position); a leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group; the Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force: Member, Leadership Group; Co-chair, Field Studies Working Party; and Lead, Pediatric Network (unpaid volunteer position). All funds have been paid to his institution, and he has not received any personal payments. K. A. T. has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work, and reports grants or contracts from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Public Health Agency of Canada (payment to their institution for vaccine safety evaluation studies), and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (payment to their institution for a vaccine safety study); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events for the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (speaker’s fees on COVID-19 vaccines) and Family Practice Renewal Program (Newfoundland) (speaker’s fees for COVID-19 vaccines); consulting fees for the World Health Organization (payments to author for leading vaccines safety training in middle-income countries); support for attending meetings and/or travel from Canadian Public Health Association (support to attend in person and virtual Canadian Immunization Conference). All funds have been paid to her institution, and she has not received any personal payments. J. E. I. has been an investigator on projects funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Drug Evaluation Alliance of Nova Scotia, Dalhousie Pharmacy Endowment Fund, Shoppers Drug Mart, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Pasteur, Canadian Frailty Network, and Nova Scotia Health Research fund. All funds have been paid to her institution, and she has not received any personal payments. A. M. has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Seqirus, with funds paid to her institution, and has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Medicago, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Seqirus, and for presentations from AstraZeneca, and Moderna, including participation on a DSMB or advisory board for Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Moderna, Medicago, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. G. D. S. and L. V. have been investigators on a project funded by Pfizer, outside the submitted work. All funds have been paid to their institution, and they have not received any personal payments. L. V. also reports being a co-founder and stockholder for Lumed, a company developing and commercializing expert systems in the fields of antimicrobial stewardship, infection control, and oncology. J. A. B. reports participation on an Advisory Committee for the National Advisory Committee on Immunization as a member (volunteer, unpaid participation). All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Pregnant individuals have been receiving COVID-19 vaccines following pre-authorisation clinical trials in non-pregnant people. This study aimed to determine the frequency and nature of significant health events among pregnant females after COVID-19 vaccination, compared with unvaccinated pregnant controls and vaccinated non-pregnant individuals., Methods: We did an observational cohort study, set in seven Canadian provinces and territories including Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, Alberta, Nova Scotia, Yukon, and Prince Edward Island. Eligibility criteria for vaccinated individuals were a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine within the previous 7 days; an active email address and telephone number; ability to communicate in English or French; and residence in the aforementioned provinces or territories. Study participants were pregnant and non-pregnant females aged 15-49 years. Individuals were able to participate as controls if they were unvaccinated and fulfilled the other criteria. Data were collected primarily by self-reported survey after both vaccine doses, with telephone follow-up for those reporting any medically attended event. Participants reported significant health events (new or worsening of a health event sufficient to cause work or school absenteeism, medical consultation, or prevent daily activities) occurring within 7 days of vaccination or within the past 7 days for unvaccinated individuals. We employed multivariable logistic regression to examine significant health events associated with mRNA vaccines, adjusting for age group, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and trimester, as appropriate., Findings: As of Nov 4, 2021, 191 360 women aged 15-49 years with known pregnancy status had completed the first vaccine dose survey and 94 937 had completed the second dose survey. 180 388 received one dose and 94 262 received a second dose of an mRNA vaccine, with 5597 pregnant participants receiving dose one and 3108 receiving dose two, and 174 765 non-pregnant participants receiving dose one and 91 131 receiving dose two. Of 6179 included unvaccinated control participants, 339 were pregnant and 5840 were not pregnant. Overall, 226 (4·0%) of 5597 vaccinated pregnant females reported a significant health event after dose one of an mRNA vaccine, and 227 (7·3%) of 3108 after dose two, compared with 11 (3·2%) of 339 pregnant unvaccinated females. Pregnant vaccinated females had an increased odds of a significant health event within 7 days of the vaccine after dose two of mRNA-1273 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4·4 [95% CI 2·4-8·3]) compared with pregnant unvaccinated controls within the past 7 days, but not after dose one of mRNA-1273 or any dose of BNT162b2. Pregnant vaccinated females had decreased odds of a significant health event compared with non-pregnant vaccinated females after both dose one (aOR 0·63 [95% CI 0·55-0·72]) and dose two (aOR 0·62 [0·54-0·71]) of any mRNA vaccination. There were no significant differences in any analyses when restricted to events which led to medical attention., Interpretation: COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have a good safety profile in pregnancy. These data can be used to appropriately inform pregnant people regarding reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy, and should be considered alongside effectiveness and immunogenicity data to make appropriate recommendations about best use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy., Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Public Health Agency of Canada., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo, and VBI Vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. OGV has been an investigator, coinvestigator, or expert panelist on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, and Seqirus, outside of the submitted work. JDK has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, and Pfizer. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. KAT has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline. All funds have been paid to her institute, and she has not received any personal payments. JEI has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi-Pasteur. All funds have been paid to her institute, and she has not received any personal payments. AJM has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Seqirus, with funds paid to her institution, and has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Astra-Zeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Medicago, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, and for presentations from Astra-Zeneca, and Moderna. GDS has been an investigator on a project funded by Pfizer. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Invasive pneumococcal disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae can cause mortality and severe morbidity due to sepsis, meningitis and pneumonia, particularly in young children and the elderly. Recurrent invasive pneumococcal disease is rare yet serious sequelae of invasive pneumococcal disease that is associated with the immunocompromised and leads to a high mortality rate., Method: This retrospective study reviewed recurrent invasive pneumococcal disease cases from the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program, ACTive (IMPACT) between 1991 and 2019, an active network for surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases and adverse events following immunization for children ages 0-16 years. Data were collected from 12 pediatric tertiary care hospitals across all 3 eras of public pneumococcal conjugate vaccine implementation in Canada., Results: The survival rate within our cohort of 180 recurrent invasive pneumococcal disease cases was 98.3%. A decrease of 26.4% in recurrent invasive pneumococcal disease due to vaccine serotypes was observed with pneumococcal vaccine introduction. There was also a 69.0% increase in the rate of vaccination in children with preexisting medical conditions compared with their healthy peers., Conclusion: The decrease in recurrent invasive pneumococcal disease due to vaccine-covered serotypes has been offset by an increase of non-vaccine serotypes in this sample of Canadian children., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: Although the passage of blood in stools in children represents a medical emergency, children seeking emergency department (ED) care remain poorly characterized. Our primary objective was to compare clinical characteristics and etiologic pathogens in children with acute diarrhea with and without caregiver-reported hematochezia. Secondary objectives were to characterize interventions and resource utilization., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Alberta Provincial Pediatric EnTeric Infection TEam (APPETITE) database. Children <18 years presenting to two pediatric EDs within a 24-hour period and <7 days of symptoms were consecutively recruited., Results: Of 1,061 participants, 115 (10.8%) reported hematochezia at the enrollment visit at which time those with hematochezia, compared to those without, had more diarrheal episodes/24-hour period (9 vs. 6; difference: 2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0, 4.0; p < 0.001), and were less likely to have experienced vomiting (54.8% vs. 80.2%; difference: -25.4; 95% CI: -34.9, -16.0; p < 0.001). They were more likely to receive intravenous fluids (33.0% vs. 17.9%; difference: 15.2; 95% CI: 6.2, 24.1; p < 0.001) and require repeat health care visits (45.5% vs. 34.7%; difference: 10.7; 95% CI: 0.9, 20.6; p = 0.03). A bacterial pathogen was identified in 33.0% of children with hematochezia versus 7.9% without (difference: 25.1; 95% CI: 16.3, 33.9; p < 0.001); viruses were detected in 31.3% of children with hematochezia compared to 72.3% in those without (difference: -41.0%, 95% CI: -49.9, -32.1; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In children with acute diarrhea, caregiver report of hematochezia, compared to the absence of hematochezia, was associated with more diarrheal but fewer vomiting episodes, and greater resource consumption. The former group of children was also more likely to have bacteria detected in their stool., (© 2021 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines require enhanced safety monitoring after emergency approval. The Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network monitors the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and provides enhanced monitoring for healthy, auto-immune, immunocompromised, pregnant and breastfeeding populations and allows for the detection of safety signals., Methods and Analysis: Online participant reporting of health events in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals 12 years of age and older is captured in three surveys: 1 week after dose 1, 1 week after dose 2 and 7 months after dose 1. Medically attended events are followed up by telephone. The number, percentage, rate per 10 000 and incident rate ratios with 95% CIs are calculated by health event, vaccine type, sex and in 10-year age groups., Ethics and Dissemination: Each study site has Research Ethics Board approvals for the project (UBC Children's & Women's, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Health PEI, Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, IWK Health, Unity Health Toronto and CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Ethics Boards). Individuals are invited to participate in this active surveillance and electronic consent is given before proceeding to each survey. Weekly reports are shared with public health and posted on the study website. At least one peer-reviewed manuscript is produced., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JAB, MPM, JDK, AMcG, JEI and KM have no competing interests. MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines outside the submitted work. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. GDS and LV report grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. KAT reports consultancy fees from Pfizer and a grant from GSK outside the submitted work. OGV has been an investigator, coinvestigator and/or expert panellist on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer and Seqirus, outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: As children with isolated vomiting are rarely able to provide a specimen suitable for routine pathogen testing, we have limited knowledge about their infecting pathogens., Methods: Between December 2014 and August 2018, children <18 years old with presumed acute gastroenteritis who presented to 2 emergency departments (EDs) in Alberta, Canada, were recruited. Eligible participants had ≥3 episodes of vomiting and/or diarrhea in a 24-hour period, <7 days of symptoms, and provided a rectal swab or stool specimen. We quantified the proportion of children with isolated vomiting in whom an enteropathogen was identified, and analyzed clinical characteristics, types of enteropathogens, resources used, and alternative diagnoses., Results: Of the 2695 participants, at the ED visit, 295 (10.9%), 1321 (49.0%), and 1079 (40.0%) reported having isolated diarrhea, vomiting and diarrhea, or isolated vomiting, respectively. An enteropathogen was detected most commonly in those with vomiting and diarrhea (1067/1321; 80.8%); detection did not differ between those with isolated diarrhea (170/295; 57.6%) and isolated vomiting (589/1079; 54.6%) (95% confidence interval of the difference: -3.4%, 9.3%). Children with isolated vomiting most often had a virus (557/1077; 51.7%), most commonly norovirus (321/1077; 29.8%); 5.7% (62/1079) had a bacterial pathogen. X-rays, ultrasounds, and urine tests were most commonly performed in children with isolated vomiting. Alternate etiologies were most common in those with isolated vomiting (5.7%; 61/1079)., Conclusions: The rate of enteropathogen identification in children with isolated vomiting using molecular diagnostic tests and rectal swabs is substantial. Molecular diagnostics offer an emerging diagnostic strategy in children with isolated vomiting., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae disease is preceded by asymptomatic nasopharyngeal carriage. Measuring carriage in healthy populations provides data on what serotypes are present in communities, which is of interest in the era of polyvalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Nasopharyngeal swabs from a survey of 682 and 800 healthy children in 2016 and 2018, respectively, were analyzed by culture and Quellung reaction to determine rates of carriage and serotypes. All swabs from 2016 and 300 randomly selected swabs from 2018 were then analyzed using real-time semi-quantitative PCR (qPCR) to detect S. pneumoniae gene targets lytA, piaA , and SP2020 and determine serotype. There were 71 (10.4%) and 68 (8.5%) culture positive samples in 2016 and 2018, respectively. All of these were also positive by qPCR except one that was equivocal. In total, 46.0% of 2016 swabs were positive by qPCR. In 2018, results from the selected sample extrapolated to the complete sample showed 49.0% positive by qPCR. PCV13 serotypes were detected in 29.3% and 21.7% of S. pneumoniae qPCR positive samples from 2016 and 2018, respectively; compared with only 8.4% and 6.0% PCV13 serotypes detected by Quellung reaction in culture positive samples. Compared with culture, qPCR detected S. pneumoniae more frequently. Further, qPCR serotyping detected PCV13 serotypes in a larger proportion of samples than culture and Quellung reaction did, showing that, despite established universal childhood PCV13 immunization, vaccine serotypes can still be detected in a large proportion of young children.

Importance: Detection of Clostridioides difficile has frequently been described in asymptomatic infants and children, but accurate estimates across the age spectrum are unavailable., Objective: To assess the prevalence of C difficile detection among asymptomatic children across the age spectrum., Data Sources: This systematic review and meta-analysis included a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2020. Search terms included Clostridium difficile, Peptoclostridium difficile, Clostridioides difficile, CDF OR CDI OR c diff OR c difficile, Clostridium infections OR cd positive diarrhea OR cd positive diarrhea OR Clostridium difficile OR Peptoclostridium difficile OR pseudomembranous colitis OR pseudomembranous enterocolitis, enterocolitis, and pseudomembranous. These were combined with the following terms: bacterial colonization and colonization OR colonized OR colonizing OR epidemiology OR prevalence OR seroprevalence., Study Selection: Studies were screened independently by 2 authors. Studies were included if they reported testing for C difficile among asymptomatic children (ie, children without diarrhea) younger than 18 years., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Data were pooled using a random-effects model., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was prevalence of C difficile detection among asymptomatic children. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of toxigenic vs nontoxigenic strains of C difficile and prevalence of C difficile detection stratified by geographic region, income status, testing method, and year of testing., Results: A total of 95 studies with 19 186 participants were included. Rates of detection of toxigenic or nontoxigenic C difficile were greatest among infants aged 6 to 12 months (41%; 95% CI, 32%-50%) and decreased to 12% (95% CI, 7%-18%) among children aged 5 to 18 years. The prevalence of toxigenic C difficile colonization was lower, peaking at 14% (95% CI, 8%-21%) among infants aged 6 to 12 months and decreasing to 6% (95% CI, 2%-11%) among children older than 5 years. Although prevalence differed by geographic region (ie, North and South America vs Europe: β, -0.151, P = .001; North and South America vs Western Pacific: β, 0.136, P = .007), there was no difference by testing method (ie, culture vs polymerase chain reaction: β, 0.069, P = .052; culture vs enzyme immunoassay: β, -0.178, P = .051), income class (low-middle income vs high income: β, -0.144, P = .23; upper-middle vs high income: β, -0.020, P = .64), or period (before 1990 vs 2010-2020: β, -0.125, P = .19; 1990-1999 vs 2010-2020: β, -0.037, P = .42; 2000-2009 vs 2010-2020: β, -0.006, P = .86)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, C difficile colonization rates among children were greatest at 6 to 12 months of age and decreased thereafter. These estimates may provide context for interpreting C difficile test results among young children.

Background & Aims: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations may be altered by immunosuppressive therapies or IBD itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on live vaccines., Methods: Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative process and voted on by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients., Results: Three good practice statements included reviewing a patient's vaccination status at diagnosis and at regular intervals, giving appropriate vaccinations as soon as possible, and not delaying urgently needed immunosuppressive therapy to provide vaccinations. There are 4 recommendations on the use of live vaccines. Measles, mumps, rubella vaccine is recommended for both adult and pediatric patients with IBD not on immunosuppressive therapy, but not for those using immunosuppressive medications (conditional). Varicella vaccine is recommended for pediatric patients with IBD not on immunosuppressive therapy, but not for those using immunosuppressive medications (conditional). For adults, recommendations are conditionally in favor of varicella vaccine for those not on immunosuppressive therapy, and against for those on therapy. No recommendation was made regarding the use of live vaccines in infants born to mothers using biologics because the desirable and undesirable effects were closely balanced and the evidence was insufficient., Conclusions: Maintaining appropriate vaccination status in patients with IBD is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, live vaccines are recommended in patients not on immunosuppressive therapy, but not for those using immunosuppressive medications. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of live vaccines in patients on immunosuppressive therapy., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Aims: The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations can be altered by immunosuppressive therapies, and perhaps by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on inactivated vaccines., Methods: Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative online platform, and voted on by a multidisciplinary group. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients., Results: Consensus was reached on 15 of 20 questions. Recommendations address the following vaccines: Haemophilus influenzae type b, recombinant zoster, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis, and human papillomavirus. Most of the recommendations for patients with IBD are congruent with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommendations for the general population, with the following exceptions. In patients with IBD, the panel suggested Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for patients older than 5 years of age, recombinant zoster vaccine for adults younger than 50 year of age, and hepatitis B vaccine for adults without a risk factor. Consensus was not reached, and recommendations were not made for 5 statements, due largely to lack of evidence, including double-dose hepatitis B vaccine, timing of influenza immunization in patients on biologics, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines in adult patients without risk factors, and human papillomavirus vaccine in patients aged 27-45 years., Conclusions: Patients with IBD may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, maintaining appropriate vaccination status in these patients is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, IBD is not a contraindication to the use of inactivated vaccines, but immunosuppressive therapy may reduce vaccine responses., (Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

After the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for children, invasive pneumococcal disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 4 declined in all ages in Alberta, Canada, but it has reemerged and spread in adults in Calgary, primarily among persons who are experiencing homelessness or who use illicit drugs. We conducted clinical and molecular analyses to examine the cases and isolates. Whole-genome sequencing analysis indicated relatively high genetic variability of serotype 4 isolates. Phylogenetic analysis identified 1 emergent sequence type (ST) 244 lineage primarily associated within Alberta and nationally distributed clades ST205 and ST695. Isolates from 6 subclades of the ST244 lineage clustered regionally, temporally, and by homeless status. In multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with serotype 4 invasive pneumococcal disease were being male, being <65 years of age, experiencing homelessness, having a diagnosis of pneumonia or empyema, or using illicit drugs.

Background: Transplacentally transferred antibodies induced by maternal pertussis vaccination interfere with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination. We evaluated whether this interference remains in toddlers after booster vaccination., Methods: In a prior phase IV, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT02377349), pregnant women in Australia, Canada and Europe received intramuscular tetanus-reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap group) or placebo (control group) at 27 0/7 -36 6/7 weeks' gestation, with crossover immunization postpartum. Their infants were primed (study NCT02422264) and boosted (at 11-18 months; current study NCT02853929) with diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated poliovirus/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Immunogenicity before and after booster vaccination, and reactogenicity and safety of the booster were evaluated descriptively., Results: 263 (Tdap group) and 277 (control group) toddlers received a DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster. Pre-booster vaccination, observed geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for the three pertussis antigens and diphtheria were 1.4-1.5-fold higher in controls than in the Tdap group. No differences were observed for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens. One month post-booster vaccination, booster response rates for pertussis antigens were ≥ 92.1% and seroprotection rates for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were ≥ 99.2% in both groups (primary objective). Higher post-booster GMCs were observed in controls versus the Tdap group for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (1.2-fold), anti-pertussis toxoid (1.5-fold) and anti-diphtheria (1.4-fold). GMCs for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were similar between groups. Serious adverse events were reported for three toddlers (controls, not vaccination-related). One death occurred pre-booster (Tdap group, not vaccination-related)., Conclusions: As a consequence of interference of maternal pertussis antibodies with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination, pertussis antibody concentrations were still lower in toddlers from Tdap-vaccinated mothers before DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster vaccination. After the booster, antibody concentrations were lower for filamentous hemagglutinin and pertussis toxoid but not for pertactin. The clinical significance of this interference requires further evaluation., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02853929., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: BAN reports grants from the GSK group of companies (GSK) and support from other vaccine manufacturers. BC, MAC, NMes, NMey and SOK are employees of GSK, and BC, MAC and NMes own GSK restricted shares. FMT, JGS, SAH, TN and KPP’s institutions received grants from GSK during the conduct of the study. FMT’s institution received financial and non-financial support from Ablynx, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Jansen, MedImmune, MSD, Novavax, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Pasteur and Seqirus outside the submitted work. SAH received honoraria for participation in ad-hoc advisory committees for GSK and Sanofi Pasteur. TN received personal fees from GSK for serving as chair of advisory committees outside the submitted work. BT’s institution received grants from GSK during the conduct of the study; research grants for clinical trials were also given to his institution by Pfizer, MSD and Sanofi Pasteur. KPP received a fellowship from National Health and Medical Research Council for conducting the present work, and her institution received financial support from DBV Technologies, Medlmmune, Novavax and Pfizer for conducting trials outside the submitted work. ISC has received grants and/or honoraria as a consultant/advisor or to attend conferences and practical courses from GSK, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD and Pfizer outside the submitted work. JMMA reports receiving fees and non-financial support from GSK, as well as fees from Pfizer and MSD outside the submitted work. LK is working as consultant for GSK. MB, JB, MJCO, EEP, JJ, MMV, PK, PGM, JTRA, SR, ZS, MV, OGV and GVZ declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Norovirus is a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis. With vaccines in development, population-based estimates of norovirus burden are needed to identify target populations, quantify potential benefits, and understand disease dynamics., Methods: We estimated the attributable fraction (AF) for norovirus infections in children, defined as the proportion of children testing positive for norovirus whose gastroenteritis was attributable to norovirus. We calculated the standardized incidence and emergency department (ED) visit rates attributable to norovirus using provincial gastroenteritis visit administrative data., Results: From 3731 gastroenteritis case patients and 2135 controls we determined that the AFs were 67.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.5%-100%) and 91.6% (88.8%-94.4%) for norovirus genogroups I (GI) and II (GII), respectively. Norovirus GII AF varied by season but not age. We attributed 116 episodes (95% CI, 103-129) and 59 (51-67) ED visits per 10 000 child-years to norovirus GII across all ages, accounting for 20% and 18% of all medically attended gastroenteritis episodes and ED visits, respectively., Conclusions: In children, a large proportion of norovirus GII detections reflect causation, demonstrating significant potential for norovirus GII vaccines. Seasonal variation in the norovirus GII AF may have implications for understanding the role asymptomatic carriage plays in disease dynamics., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The objective of this study was to characterize the etiological role of human adenovirus (HAdV) serotypes in pediatric gastroenteritis. Using a case-control design, we compared the frequencies of HAdV serotypes between children with ≥3 episodes of vomiting or diarrhea within 24 h and <7 days of symptoms (i.e., cases) and those with no infectious symptoms (i.e., controls). Stool samples and/or rectal swabs underwent molecular serotyping with cycle threshold (Ct) values provided by multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR testing. Cases without respiratory symptoms were analyzed to calculate the proportion of disease attributed to individual HAdV serotypes (i.e., attributable fraction). Between December 2014 and August 2018, adenoviruses were detected in 18.8% (629/3,347) of cases and 7.2% (97/1,355) of controls, a difference of 11.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6%, 13.5%). In 96% (95% CI, 92 to 98%) of HAdV F40/41 detections, the symptoms could be attributed to the identified serotype; when serotypes C1, C2, C5, and C6 were detected, they were responsible for symptoms in 52% (95% CI, 12 to 73%). Ct values were lower among cases than among controls ( P  < 0.001). HAdV F40/41, C2, and C1 accounted for 59.7% (279/467), 17.6% (82/467), and 12.0% (56/467) of all typed cases, respectively. Among cases, Ct values were lower for F40/41 serotypes than for non-F40/41 serotypes ( P  < 0.001). HAdV F40/41 serotypes account for the majority of HAdV-positive gastroenteritis cases, and when detected, disease is almost always attributed to infection with these pathogens. Non-F40/41 HAdV species have a higher frequency of asymptomatic infection and may not necessarily explain gastroenteritis symptoms. Real-time quantitative PCR may be useful in differentiating asymptomatic shedding from active infection., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.)

Norovirus is a major pathogen identified in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE), little is known about the strain's diversity and their clinical severity. Stool and/or rectal swabs were collected from children ≤18 years of age recruited at emergency departments (ED), and a provincial nursing advice phone line due to AGE symptoms in the province of Alberta, Canada between December 2014 and August 2018. Specimens were tested using a reverse transcription real time PCR and genotyped by Sanger sequencing. The Modified Vesikari Scale score (MVS) was used to evaluate the disease severity. The objectives are to identify the Genogroup and Genotype distribution and to compare illness severity between the GI and GII genogroups and to complete further analyses comparing the GII genotypes identified. GII.4 was the genotype most commonly identified. Children with GII.4 had higher MVS scores (12.0 (10.0, 14.0; p = 0.002)) and more prolonged diarrheal (5 days (3.0, 7.8)) and vomiting (3.2 days (1.7, 5.3; p < 0.001)) durations compared to other non GII.4 strains. The predominant strain varied by year with GII.4 Sydney[P31] predominant in 2014/15, GII.4 Sydney[P16] in 2015/16 and 2017/18, and GII.3[P12] in 2016/17. Genogroup II norovirus strains predominated in children with AGE with variance between years; clinical severity associated with different strains varied with episodes being most severe among GII.4 infected children.

Objectives: To determine if the clinical characteristics of children with gastroenteritis and influenza identified in their stool differ from those whose stool was influenza-negative., Methods: Children <18-years with gastroenteritis whose stool tested negative for enteropathogen were tested for influenza in stool. The clinical features between influenza-positive and influenza-negative gastroenteritis cases were compared. Stools from controls without infection were also tested for influenza., Results: Among the 440 gastroenteritis cases, those who were influenza test-positive were older [median age 4.0 (IQR: 2.3, 5.5) vs. 1.5 (IQR: 0.5, 4.0) years; P = 0.008], more likely to present in fall or winter (92.3 % vs. 48.0 %; P = 0.001), be febrile (84.6 % vs. 30.6 %; P < 0.001), have respiratory symptoms (91.7 % vs. 44.8 %; P = 0.002), have dehydration [median Clinical Dehydration Scale score: 4 (IQR: 1.5, 4.5) vs. 2 (IQR: 0, 3); P = 0.034], and have higher Modified Vesikari Scale scores [median: 13 (IQR: 10.5, 14.0) vs. 10 (IQR: 9.0, 13.0); P = 0.044], than those who tested negative. Thirteen gastroenteritis cases (13/440; 3.0 %) including one child without respiratory symptoms vs. one control (1/250; 0.4 %) were influenza stool positive., Conclusions: Fever, respiratory symptoms, more severe illness, and older age were more common in children with gastroenteritis with influenza detected in stool, compared to those tested negative., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

BackgroundThe Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network monitors the safety of seasonal influenza vaccines in Canada.AimTo provide enhanced surveillance for seasonal influenza and pandemic influenza vaccines.MethodsIn 2017/18 and 2018/19 influenza seasons, adults (≥ 15 years of age) and parents of children vaccinated with the seasonal influenza vaccine participated in an observational study using web-based active surveillance. Participants completed an online survey for health events occurring in the first 7 days after vaccination. Participants who received the influenza vaccine in the previous season, but had not yet been vaccinated for the current season, were unvaccinated controls.ResultsIn 2017/18, 43,751 participants and in 2018/19, 47,798 completed the online safety survey. In total, 957 of 30,173 participants vaccinated in 2017/18 (3.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.0-3.4) and 857 of 25,799 participants vaccinated in 2018/19 (3.3%; 95% CI: 3.1-3.5) reported a health problem of sufficient intensity to prevent their normal daily activities and/or cause them to seek medical care (including hospitalisation). This compared to 323 of 13,578 (2.4%; 95% CI: 2.1-2.6) and 544 of 21,999 (2.5%; 95% CI: 2.3-2.7) controls in each respective season. The event rate in vaccinated adults and children was higher than the background rate and was associated with specific influenza vaccines. The higher rate of events was associated with systemic symptoms and migraines/headaches.ConclusionIn 2017/18 and 2018/19, higher rates of events were reported following seasonal influenza vaccination than in the pre-vaccination period. This signal was associated with several seasonal influenza vaccine products.

Background: Recent increases in pertussis morbidity and mortality rates among young infants have led to a recommendation in some countries for vaccination against pertussis during pregnancy. Having data on the burden of pediatric pertussis in a large population over time is important for establishing the true burden of disease in the acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine era. Here, we describe age-specific epidemiology and morbidity and mortality rates in children hospitalized with pertussis over 17 years across Canada in the aP vaccine era., Methods: Patients aged ≤16 years who were admitted to 1 of 12 pediatric tertiary-care hospitals across Canada between 1999 and 2015 with confirmed (laboratory-confirmed or epidemiologically linked) or probable (clinically diagnosed) pertussis were included., Results: Overall, 1402 patients with pertussis were included. Infants aged <2 months had the highest mean annual incidences of pertussis hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (116.40 [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.32-147.49] and 33.48 [95% CI, 26.35-40.62] per 100 000 population, respectively). The overall proportion of children who required ICU admission was 25.46%, and the proportion was highest in infants aged <2 months (37.90%). Over the span of this study, 21 deaths occurred. Age of <16 weeks, prematurity, encephalopathy, and a confirmed pertussis diagnosis were independent risk factors for ICU admission. Age of <4 weeks, prematurity, and female sex were independent risk factors for death., Conclusions: In the aP vaccine era, endemic pertussis still contributes considerably to childhood morbidity and death, particularly in infants aged <2 months. Vaccination against pertussis during pregnancy has the potential to reduce this disease burden., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.)

Background: Concern about adverse events following immunization is frequently cited by both those who receive or decline vaccines. Neurological adverse events are especially concerning., Objectives: Our aim was to detect associations between seasonal influenza vaccination and the occurrence of severe anesthesia/paresthesia or severe headaches., Methods: Data were analyzed from the Canadian National Vaccine Safety network. Events occuring on days 0-7 were self-reported and prevented daily activity, led to school or work absenteeism, or required medical attention. Controls were the previous year's vaccinees; events in controls were collected prior to the start of the influenza vaccination program of each year (2012/13 through 2016/17). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between seasonal influenza vaccination and the occurrence of anesthesia/paresthesia or severe headaches., Results: The total sample was 107,565 for investigating anesthesia/paresthesia and 97,420 for investigating severe headaches. Anesthesia/paresthesia was reported by 104/107,565 (0.10%) participants; 63/69,129 (0.09%) vaccinees and 41/38,436 (0.11%) controls (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.60, 1.32). Severe headaches were reported by 1361/97,420 (1.40%) participants; 907/61,463 (1.48%) vaccinees and 454/35,957 (1.26%) controls (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.08, 1.36). No specific vaccine product was associated with severe headaches., Conclusions: Our study found no association between severe anesthesia/paresthesia and seasonal influenza vaccination. While there was an association with severe headaches as an adverse event following influenza vaccination, the rates of these events are similar to rates reported from clinical trials and are not a cause for additional concern., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MAA, JAB, OGV, JS, MN, AM, and BLC none. GDS has received grants for investigator-initiated studies unrelated to influenza vaccine from Pfizer and provided paid expert testimony for the Ontario Nurses Association, the Quebec Ministry of Justice and GSK. LV has served on advisory boards for Merck, Abbott, and Wyeth and has received compensation to conduct clinical trials involving antibacterials and C. difficile vaccines from Sanofi, GSK, Wyeth, Pfizer, Cubist, Merck, and Actelion. KAT has received grants from GSK and consultancy fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work. JDK has received investigator initiated funding for epidemiologic research from Pfizer and contract clinical trial funding from Merck outside the submitted work. JEI has received investigator-initiated grants from GSK and Sanofi outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pertussis immunization during pregnancy is recommended in many countries. Data from large randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of this approach., Methods: This phase IV, observer-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial assessed immunogenicity, transplacental transfer of maternal pertussis antibodies, reactogenicity and safety of a reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) during pregnancy. Women received Tdap or placebo at 27-36 weeks' gestation with crossover ≤ 72-hour-postpartum immunization. Immune responses were assessed before the pregnancy dose and 1 month after, and from the umbilical cord at delivery. Superiority (primary objective) was reached if the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the pertussis geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratios (Tdap/control) in cord blood were ≥ 1.5. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and pregnancy-/neonate-related AEs of interest were recorded., Results: 687 pregnant women were vaccinated (Tdap: N = 341 control: N = 346). Superiority of the pertussis immune response (maternally transferred pertussis antibodies in cord blood) was demonstrated by the GMC ratios (Tdap/control): 16.1 (95% CI: 13.5-19.2) for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin, 20.7 (15.9-26.9) for anti-pertactin and 8.5 (7.0-10.2) for anti-pertussis toxoid. Rates of pregnancy-/neonate-related AEs of interest, solicited general and unsolicited AEs were similar between groups. None of the serious AEs reported throughout the study were considered related to maternal Tdap vaccination., Conclusions: Tdap vaccination during pregnancy resulted in high levels of pertussis antibodies in cord blood, was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile. This supports the recommendation of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy to prevent early-infant pertussis disease., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02377349., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: BC, MAC, NMes, NMey and SOK are employees of the GSK group of companies (GSK), and BC and NMes own GSK restricted shares. BT, MBEP, OGV, SAH and TN’s institutions received grants from GSK during the conduct of the study. KPP received grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council during the conduct of the study, and from MedImmune, Novavax and Pfizer outside the submitted work. FMT’s institution received financial support from GSK during the conduct of the study, as well as financial and non-financial support outside the submitted work; he also received personal fees from Pfizer, Novavax, MSD and Sanofi Pasteur; his institution also received financial support as trial fees from Ablynx, Jansen, Regeneron, Medimmune, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi Pasteur, Novavax and Novartis, as well as non-financial support from Pfizer and MSD and grants from MSD and Astra Zeneca. LK is working as consultant for GSK. SAH is member of ad-hoc advisory committees for GSK and Sanofi Pasteur and he has a patent for novel triple adjuvant issued. AMG, CMP, GVZ, ICG, JEAF, MARZ, MCFM, MDCM, MMF, MV, PGM, PK, PM, YRE and ZS declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Pertussis immunization during pregnancy results in high pertussis antibody concentrations in young infants but may interfere with infant immune responses to post-natal immunization., Methods: This phase IV, multi-country, open-label study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of infant primary vaccination with DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). Enrolled infants (6-14 weeks old) were born to mothers who were randomized to receive reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap group) or placebo (control group) during pregnancy (27 0/7 -36 6/7 weeks' gestation) with crossover immunization postpartum. All infants received 2 or 3 DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib and PCV13 doses according to national schedules. Immunogenicity was assessed in infants pre- and 1 month post-primary vaccination. The primary objective was to assess seroprotection/vaccine response rates for DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens 1 month post-primary vaccination., Results: 601 infants (Tdap group: 296; control group: 305) were vaccinated. One month post-priming, seroprotection rates were 100% (diphtheria; tetanus), ≥98.5% (hepatitis B), ≥95.9% (polio) and ≥94.5% (Hib) in both groups. Vaccine response rates for pertussis antigens were significantly lower in infants whose mothers received pregnancy Tdap (37.5-77.1%) versus placebo (90.0-99.2%). Solicited and unsolicited adverse event rates were similar between groups. Serious adverse events occurred in 2.4% (Tdap group) and 5.6% (control group) of infants, none were vaccination-related., Conclusions: Pertussis antibodies transferred during pregnancy may decrease the risk of pertussis infection in the first months of life but interfere with the infant's ability to produce pertussis antibodies, the clinical significance of which remains unknown. Safety and reactogenicity results were consistent with previous experience., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02422264., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [BAN reports grant from the GSK group of companies (GSK) and personal fees from Pfizer, MSD and Sanofi Pasteur. BC, MAC, NMes, NMey and SOK are employees of GSK, and BC and NMes own GSK restricted shares. FMT, KPP, OGV, SAH and TN’s institutions received grants from GSK during the conduct of the study. FMT’s institution received financial support from GSK during the conduct of the study, as well as financial and non-financial support outside the submitted work; he also received personal fees from Pfizer, Novavax, MSD and Sanofi Pasteur; his institution also received financial support as trial fees from Ablynx, Jansen, Regeneron, Medimmune, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi Pasteur, Novavax and Novartis, as well as non-financial support from Pfizer and MSD and grants from MSD and AstraZeneca. JMMA reports receiving fees and non-financial support from GSK during the conduct of the study, as well as fees from GSK, Pfizer and MSD outside the submitted work. LK is working as consultant for GSK. SAH is member of ad-hoc advisory committees for GSK and Sanofi Pasteur and he has a patent for novel triple adjuvant issued. ACM, FOT, GVZ, JGS, JTRA, MB, MJCO, MMV, MV, PGM, PM and ZS declare no conflicts of interest.]., (Copyright © 2019 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Little is known about the epidemiology and severity of gastroenteritis among children treated at home. We sought to compare illness severity and etiology between children brought for emergency department (ED) care to those managed at home (i.e., community). Prospective cohort study of children enrolled between December 2014 and December 2016 in two pediatric EDs in Alberta, Canada along with children treated at home after telephone triage (i.e., community). Primary outcomes were maximal frequency of vomiting and diarrhea in the 24-h pre-enrollment period; secondary outcomes included etiologic pathogens, dehydration severity, future healthcare visits, and treatments provided. A total of 1613 patients (1317 ED, 296 community) were enrolled. Median maximal frequency of vomiting was higher in the ED cohort (5 (3, 10) vs. 5 (2, 8); P < 0.001). Proportion of children with diarrhea and its 24-h median frequency were lower in the ED cohort (61.3 vs. 82.8% and 2 (0, 6) vs. 4 (1, 7); P < 0.001, respectively). In regression analysis, the ED cohort had a higher maximum number of vomiting episodes pre-enrollment (incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.25; 95% CI 1.12, 1.40) while the community cohort had higher maximal 24-h period diarrheal episodes (IRR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01, 1.43). Norovirus was identified more frequently in the community cohort (36.8% vs. 23.6%; P < 0.001). Children treated in the ED have a greater number of vomiting episodes; those treated at home have more diarrheal episodes. Norovirus is more common among children treated symptomatically at home and thus may represent a greater burden of disease than previously thought.

Background: The ability to identify bacterial pathogens that necessitate specific clinical management or public health action in children with acute gastroenteritis is crucial to patient care and public health. However, existing stool-testing guidelines offer inconsistent recommendations, and their performance characteristics are unknown. We evaluated 6 leading gastroenteritis guidelines (eg, those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Infectious Disease Society of America) that recommend when to test children's stool for bacterial enteropathogens., Methods: Via 2 emergency departments in Alberta, Canada, we enrolled 2447 children <18 years old who presented with ≥3 episodes of diarrhea and/or vomiting in a 24-hour period. All participants were tested for 9 bacterial enteropathogens: Aeromonas, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli O157, other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, and Yersinia. Patient data gathered at the index visit were used to determine whether guidelines would recommend testing. Sensitivity and specificity to recommend testing for children with bacterial enteropathogens were calculated for each guideline., Results: Outcome data were available for 2391 (97.7%) participants, and 6% (144/2391) of participants tested positive for a bacterial enteropathogen. Guideline sensitivity ranged from 25.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.7-33.0%) to 66.9% (95% CI 59.3-74.6%), and varied for individual pathogens. Guideline specificity for all bacterial enteropathogens ranged from 63.6% (95% CI 61.6-65.6%) to 96.5% (95% CI 95.7-97.2%)., Conclusions: No guideline provided optimally balanced performance. The most sensitive guidelines missed one-third of cases and would drastically increase testing volumes. The most specific guidelines missed almost 75% of cases., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Serious infections in infants require urgent treatment. Microbiology of bacterial isolates obtained from children younger than 90 days of was reviewed. Nine-hundred thirty-two infants were identified (mean age of 39 days). Seventy-four percent of organisms obtained were relevent. Common pathogens identified were Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus. Emergence of S. aureus (18% methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA)) and ampC producing enterobacteriaceae requires prompt attention.

Background: Data on the serologic status of childhood vaccines, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), are limited in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, we evaluated vaccine coverage and seroprotection, along with CMV and EBV seropositivity, in pediatric IBD., Methods: In a cross-sectional study, demographic data, IBD history, vaccine records, and serum for antibodies against measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, varicella, hepatitis B (HBV), CMV, and EBV were collected from children with IBD. We evaluated potential factors associated with serologic status., Results: Of 156 subjects, vaccine coverage was up to date for age in 93.5% for measles, mumps, rubella, 95.6% for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, hemophilus influenza B, 75.8% for HBV, and 93.5% for varicella, including past infection and vaccination. Seroprotection was present in 65.8% for measles, 60.5% for mumps, 79.1% for rubella, 79.5% for diphtheria, 80.8% for tetanus, 70.5% for varicella, and 62.8% for HBV of subjects. Older age at diagnosis was associated with seroprotection among subjects with complete HBV (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.39) and rubella series (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37). Older age at serum collection was associated with seroprotection among subjects with prior varicella vaccination or infection (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.33-2.15). Only 25.2% and 37.8% demonstrated seropositivity to CMV and EBV, respectively. Among subjects on immunosuppressive medications, 75.3% and 62.4% were seronegative for CMV and EBV, respectively., Conclusions: Children with IBD have low serologic protection to childhood vaccines in spite of high vaccine coverage and universal vaccinations. Children with IBD, including a large proportion on immunosuppressive medications, have low seropositivity to CMV and EBV., (© 2018 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Data are lacking regarding the impact of visible pigment on rectal swab diagnostic accuracy. We describe the test characteristics of rectal swabs with and without pigment in children with gastroenteritis. Between December 2014 and September 2017, children (age, <18 years) with ≥3 episodes of vomiting and/or diarrhea in a 24-h period and symptoms for <7 days were enrolled through two pediatric emergency departments and from a province-wide nursing telephone advice line in Alberta, Canada. Specimens were analyzed by employing nucleic acid amplification panels. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the rectal swabs, with stool specimen results being used as the reference standard. An enteropathogen was detected in 76.0% (1,399/1,841) of the paired specimens. A total of 54.4% (1,001/1841) of the swabs had visible pigment. The respective enteropathogen detection characteristics of swabs with and without visible pigment were as follows: 92.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.0%, 94.0%) versus 83.7% (95% CI, 80.5%, 86.4%) for sensitivity, 94.3% (95% CI, 90.5%, 96.6%) versus 91.2% (95% CI, 86.3%, 94.5%) for specificity, 97.9% (95% CI, 96.4%, 98.8%) versus 96.5% (95% CI, 94.5%, 97.8%) for PPV, and 80.9% (95% CI, 76.0%, 85.1%) versus 65.8% (95% CI, 60.0%, 71.1%) for NPV. Processing of swabs without visible pigment would increase the rate of identification of positive swabs from 50.0% (682/1,365) to 88.3% (1,205/1,365). There is a modest decrease in the reliability of a negative test on swabs without evidence of pigment, but the overall yield is significantly greater when they are not excluded from testing. Hence, rectal swabs without visible feces should not be routinely rejected from testing., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

Although enteric multianalyte syndromic panels are increasingly employed, direct comparisons with traditional methods and the inclusion of host phenotype correlations are limited. Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GPP) and culture results are highly concordant. However, phenotypic and microbiological confirmatory testing raises concerns regarding the accuracy of the GPP, especially for Salmonella spp. A total of 3,089 children with gastroenteritis submitted stool specimens, rectal swab specimens, and clinical data. The primary outcome was bacterial pathogen detection agreement for shared targets between culture and the Luminex xTAG GPP. Secondary analyses included phenotype assessment, additional testing of GPP-negative/culture-positive isolate suspensions with the GPP, and in-house and commercial confirmatory nucleic acid testing of GPP-positive/culture-negative extracts. The overall percent agreement between technologies was >99% for each pathogen. Salmonella spp. were detected in specimens from 64 participants: 12 (19%) by culture only, 9 (14%) by GPP only, and 43 (67%) by both techniques. Positive percent agreement for Salmonella spp. was 78.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.6%, 87.8%). Isolate suspensions from the 12 participants with specimens GPP negative/culture positive for Salmonella tested positive by GPP. Specimens GPP positive/culture negative for Salmonella originated in younger children with less diarrhea and more vomiting. GPP-positive/culture-negative specimen extracts tested positive using additional assays for 0/2 Campylobacter -positive specimens, 0/4 Escherichia coli O157-positive specimens, 0/9 Salmonella -positive specimens, and 2/3 Shigella -positive specimens. For both rectal swab and stool samples, the median cycle threshold ( C T ) values, determined using quantitative PCR, were higher for GPP-negative/culture-positive samples than for GPP-positive/culture-positive samples (for rectal swabs, 36.9 [interquartile range {IQR}, 33.7, 37.1] versus 30.0 [IQR, 26.2, 33.2], respectively [ P  = 0.002]; for stool samples, 36.9 [IQR, 33.7, 37.1] versus 29.0 [IQR, 24.8, 30.8], respectively [ P  = 0.001]). GPP and culture have excellent overall agreement; however, for specific pathogens, GPP is less sensitive than culture and, notably, identifies samples false positive for Salmonella spp., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between individual bacterial and viral pathogens and disease severity., Methods: Children <18 years with three or more episodes of vomiting and/or diarrhoea were enrolled in two Canadian paediatric emergency departments between December 2014 and August 2016. Specimens were analysed employing molecular panels, and outcome data were collected 14 days after enrolment. The primary outcome was severe disease over the entire illness (symptom onset until 14-day follow-up), quantified employing the Modified Vesikari Scale (MVS) score. The score was additionally analysed in two other time periods: index (symptom onset until enrolment) and follow-up (enrolment until 14-day follow-up)., Results: Median participant age was 20.7 (IQR: 11.3, 44.2) months; 47.4% (518/1093) and 73.4% (802/1093) of participants had index and total MVS scores ≥11, respectively. The most commonly identified pathogens were rotavirus (289/1093; 26.4%) and norovirus (258/1093; 23.6%). In multivariable analysis, severe disease over the entire illness was associated with rotavirus (OR = 9.60; 95%CI: 5.69, 16.19), Salmonella (OR = 6.61; 95%CI: 1.50, 29.17), adenovirus (OR = 2.53; 95%CI: 1.62, 3.97), and norovirus (OR = 1.43; 95%CI: 1.01, 2.01). Pathogens associated with severe disease at the index visit were: rotavirus only (OR = 6.13; 95%CI: 4.29, 8.75), Salmonella (OR = 4.59; 95%CI: 1.71, 12.29), adenovirus only (OR = 2.06; 95%CI: 1.41, 3.00), rotavirus plus adenovirus (OR = 3.15; 95%CI: 1.35, 7.37), and norovirus (OR = 0.68; 95%CI: 0.49, 0.94). During the follow-up period, rotavirus (OR = 2.21; 95%CI: 1.50, 3.25) and adenovirus (OR = 2.10; 95%CI: 1.39, 3.18) were associated with severe disease., Conclusions: In children presenting for emergency department care with acute gastroenteritis, pathogens identified were predominantly viruses, and several of which were associated with severe disease. Salmonella was the sole bacterium independently associated with severe disease., (Copyright © 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bacterial meningitis is a severe infection of the nervous system with a high complication rate including stroke. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence, risk factors, patterns, and outcomes in pediatric meningitis complicated by stroke., Methods: The study design was a population-based, 10-year retrospective (2002 to 2012) cohort study set in Southern Alberta, Canada. The inclusion criteria were: (1) age from newborn to 18 years, (2) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging during admission, and (3) laboratory confirmed acute bacterial meningitis. The main outcomes were demographics, clinical presentations, risk factors, laboratory findings, radiographic findings, and neurological outcomes., Findings: Forty-three patients had confirmed bacterial meningitis and diffusion MRI (9 neonates (21%), 89% male; 22 infants aged one month to one year (51%), 50% male; and 12 children older than one year (28%), 58% male, median age four years (interquartile range 7.9 years). Ischemic stroke was confirmed in 16/43 (37%), often multifocal (94%). Patients with stroke were significantly more likely to have seizures (P = 0.025), otitis media (P = 0.029), and multiple presentations to hospital (P = 0.013). Mortality was 25% in children with stroke compared with 4% in those without (P = 0.067). Survivors with stroke were more likely to have neurological deficits at follow-up (69% versus 26%, P = 0.019)., Conclusions: More than one-third of children with acute bacterial meningitis and clinically indicated MRI had ischemic stroke. Stroke was associated with clinical factors including duration of illness, seizures, and causative organisms. Stroke was associated with higher mortality and morbidity, warranting consideration of increased MRI screening and new approaches to treatment., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We sought to develop diagnostic test guidance definitions for pediatric enteric infections to facilitate the interpretation of positive test results in the era of multianalyte molecular diagnostic test platforms., Methods: We employed a systematic, two-phase, modified Delphi consensus process consisting of three web-based surveys and an expert panel face-to-face meeting. In phase 1, we surveyed an advisory panel of North American experts to select pathogens requiring diagnostic test guidance definition development. In phase 2, we convened a 14-member expert panel to develop, refine, and select the final definitions through two web-based questionnaires interspersed with a face-to-face meeting. Both questionnaires asked panelists to rate the degree to which they agreed that if the definition is met the pathogen is likely to be causative of clinical illness., Results: The advisory panel survey identified 19 pathogens requiring definitions. In the expert panel premeeting survey, 13 of the 19 definitions evaluated were rated as being highly likely ("agree" or "strongly agree") to be responsible for acute gastroenteritis symptoms by ≥67% of respondent panel members. The definitions for the remaining six pathogens ( Aeromonas, Clostridium difficile, Edwardsiella, nonenteric adenovirus, astrovirus, and Entamoeba histolytica ) were indeterminate. After the expert panel meeting, only two of the modified definitions, C. difficile and E. histolytica/dispar , failed to achieve the a priori specified threshold of ≥67% agreement., Conclusions: We developed diagnostic test guidance definitions to assist healthcare providers for 17 enteric pathogens. We identified two pathogens that require further research and definition development.

Background: Immunization of pregnant women with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) provides protection against pertussis to the newborn infant., Methods: In a randomized, controlled, observer-blind, multicenter clinical trial, we measured the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap during pregnancy and the effect on the infant's immune response to primary vaccination at 2, 4, and 6 months and booster vaccination at 12 months of age. A total of 273 women received either Tdap or tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine in the third trimester and provided information for the safety analysis and samples for the immunogenicity analyses; 261 infants provided serum for the immunogenicity analyses., Results: Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups. Infants of Tdap recipients had cord blood levels that were 21% higher than maternal levels for pertussis toxoid (PT), 13% higher for filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), 4% higher for pertactin (PRN), and 7% higher for fimbriae (FIM). These infants had significantly higher PT antibody levels at birth and at 2 months and significantly higher FHA, PRN, and FIM antibodies at birth and 2 and 4 months, but significantly lower PT and FHA antibody levels at 6 and 7 months and significantly lower PRN and FIM antibody levels at 7 months than infants whose mothers received Td. Differences persisted prebooster at 12 months for all antigens and postbooster 1 month later for PT, FHA, and FIM., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that Tdap during pregnancy results in higher levels of antibodies early in infancy but lower levels after the primary vaccine series., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00553228.

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, individuals with obesity were disproportionately affected by H1N1 with increased levels of mortality and morbidity. This led to questions regarding the potential impact of lifestyle on the effectiveness of immunization. Currently, the research is limited on influenza vaccination and the associated changes in immune response with body composition and physical activity. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the potential role of adiposity and physical activity in the immune response elicited by the 2014/2015 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine. A prospective cohort study examining the 2014/2015 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine was conducted by collecting baseline and 4-week postvaccination fasting blood samples from 45 male Albertans between the ages of 18 and 35 years. Percent body fat (%BF) was assessed through dual X-ray absorptiometry imagining and physical activity through self-reported survey scores. While no differences in median %BF were associated with seroconversion rates in participants, the median physical activity score was higher among those that did not seroconvert to the vaccine. Significant differences were found for the A/Texas strain (p < 0.01) and a similar trend of lower magnitude observed for the remaining 2 influenza strains. These results suggest that higher physical activity levels may influence immune response to vaccination and that assessing factors beyond those commonly used can be of value when identifying vaccine response in the population.

Background: Since the introduction of childhood pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence has decreased in children and the predominant serotypes causing disease have changed. This study describes changes in the clinical features of IPD in children (<18 years) before and after the conjugate vaccine introduction., Methods: The Calgary Area Streptococcus pneumoniae Epidemiology Research study collects information on all IPD cases in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to compare IPD in the pre-vaccine (January 2000 to August 2002), post-7-valent protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (September 2002 to June 2010) and post-13-valent protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PCV13) (July 2010 to December 2015) periods; intensive care unit and inpatient admissions were outcome measures., Results: The incidence of IPD in children (<18 years) decreased from an average of 17 cases/100,000/yr in 2000-2001 to 4 cases/100,000/yr in 2015. The median age of children presenting with IPD shifted from 2.0 years (interquartile range: 2.5) in the pre-vaccine period to 3.9 years (interquartile range: 6.2) in the post-PCV13 period. The proportion of children with a comorbidity that is an indication for pneumococcal vaccination did not change. Invasive disease with focus (meningitis, pneumonia, empyema, peritonitis) compared with invasive disease with bacteremia only increased from 44.6% in pre-vaccine to 64.0% and 61.4% in the post-7-valent protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine and post-PCV13 periods, respectively (P = 0.017). Having IPD in the post-PCV13 period compared with the pre-vaccine period was associated with an increased odds of hospitalization [Odds ratio (OR): 2.9; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.4-6.2]., Conclusions: Clinical features of IPD have changed since pneumococcal conjugate vaccines were introduced, with a shift toward more focal infections requiring hospitalization. Although overall IPD cases have declined, disease that does occur appears to be more severe.

Background: There is mounting evidence that the recent resurgence of pertussis in many countries is in part related to the acellular vaccine, which has been administered in Canada since 1997. This vaccine elicits a different cell-mediated immune response than the previously used whole-cell vaccine, and its effectiveness wanes over time. The aim of this study is to understand the immunological, demographic and clinical factors that mediate protection from pertussis on exposure., Methods: This is a household case-control study protocol. Following notification of an index case in a household, a study team will conduct a home visit to collect data and biological specimens. The study team will return to the household 8 weeks from the onset of illness in the index case. The Th1, Th2 and Th17 responses, cytokine expression, IgG subclass, blood cell counts and presence of Bordetella pertussis will be determined. We will use laboratory and statistical analyses to determine immunological differences between contacts who are infected with B. pertussis and contacts who remain healthy, and to determine which clinical and demographic covariates are associated with a reduced risk of infection., Interpretation: The results of this study will be essential for understanding the immune response required for protection from infection with B. pertussis and will contribute to our understanding of the shortcomings of the current vaccine., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Otto Vanderkooi has conducted maternal immunization studies for pertussis in collaboration with the Canadian Centre for Vaccinology, Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline. Scott Halperin has received grants and contracts from and has served on ad hoc advisory boards for Sanofi Pasteur and GlaxoSmithKline. No other competing interests were declared., (Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.)

Background: A previous study in Calgary showed that travel to India was associated with high risk of community-onset infections with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli . We performed a follow-up study to determine the rate of rectal acquisition of ESBL-producing E. coli among travellers to South Asia and to identify the behaviours putting such travellers at high risk for acquiring ESBL-producing E. coli. METHODS: The study was performed at a travel clinic in Calgary. Travellers 18 years or older who were planning to visit South Asia for a period of at least 5 days were included. Three rectal swabs were obtained, and 2 questionaires were administered (before and after travel)., Results: A total of 149 travellers participated between January 2012 and July 2014; of these, 116 (78%) provided rectal swabs upon return to Calgary and completed both pre- and post-travel questionaires. Of the 109 travellers without colonization with ESBL-producing E. coli upon enrollment, 70 (64%) acquired ESBL-producing E. coli during travel. Of the 90 participants who visited India, 66 (73%) were positive for ESBL-producing E. coli upon their return to Calgary. Most ESBL-producing E. coli specimens were identified as producing the enzyme CTX-M-15. Behaviours associated with a statistically significant risk of acquiring ESBL-producing E. coli included visiting India (odds ratio [OR] 19.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-88.8), consuming meals with the local population (OR 6.9, 95% CI 1.2-39.6), taking any type of antibiotic during travel (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.3-14.3) and travelling for any purpose other than business (OR 12.4, 95% CI 2.8-55.2)., Interpretation: In this study, travel to India was associated with the highest risk of acquiring ESBL-producing E. coli relative to travel to other countries in South Asia. Nonbusiness travel, consuming foods with the local population and the use of antibiotics while travelling were associated with an increased risk of acquiring these antibiotic-resistant organisms while in India. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01296165., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.)

Objectives: To determine the proportion of true-positive blood culture results in children presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis. To describe the current practice of obtaining blood cultures in children with suspected appendicitis., Methods: We performed a 2-year retrospective health record review of all children aged 2 through 17 years investigated for suspected appendicitis at a tertiary Pediatric Emergency Department. Subjects were identified by searching (a) institutional records for ICD-10-CA coding, (b) diagnostic imaging records of ultrasounds for appendicitis, and (c) surgical database records for nonincidental appendectomies. Abstracted demographic and clinical data were matched to regional laboratory services data to describe the performance and result of blood cultures., Results: Overall, 1315 children investigated for appendicitis were reviewed. Seven hundred fifty (57.0%) were girls, the average age was 11.7 years (SD, 4.0). Blood cultures were obtained in 288 (21.9%) of 1315 patients. Of the 11 (3.8%) cultures that were positive, only 1 (0.35%) was a true positive. Young age, high triage acuity, and presence of fever were associated with the acquisition of cultures (P < 0.001 for all). The proportion of children undergoing appendectomy and the negative appendectomy rate was similar between those with and without blood culture (P = 0.10 and P = 0.96, respectively)., Conclusions: True-positive blood cultures are very rare in children presenting to the ED with suspected appendicitis. Given the potential for false-positive cultures and the social/economic implications of initial testing/retesting of false positives, the use of routine blood cultures for children with suspected appendicitis is not supported.

Background: Enteropathogen detection traditionally relies on diarrhoeal stool samples, but these are inconvenient to collect if they are not immediately available, leading to suboptimum return rates of samples and delayed or missed diagnostic opportunities. We sought to compare the enteropathogen yields of rectal swabs and stool specimens in children with diarrhoea or vomiting, or both., Methods: The Alberta Provincial Pediatric EnTeric Infection TEam (APPETITE) did a study in three outpatient cohorts in Calgary and Edmonton (AB, Canada)-children enrolled in the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada emergency departments, children receiving routine vaccinations at a Calgary health clinic, and symptomatic children who met criteria for treatment at home. Eligible participants were children younger than 18 years, with at least three episodes of vomiting or diarrhoea in the preceding 24 h and fewer than 7 days of symptoms. After excluding those enrolled within the previous fortnight, unable to follow-up, or having psychiatric illness, neutropenia, or requiring emergent care, we attempted to collect rectal swabs and stool from all participants. Specimens were tested with the multianalyte assay Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel, an in-house five-virus panel and bacterial culture. Primary outcomes were comparative yield (calculated as the proportion of submitted paired specimens only in which at least one pathogen was identified) and overall yield (which calculated the proportion of study participants in whom at least one pathogen was identified in all specimens, where unsubmitted specimens were analysed as negative). We used McNemar's test to do pathogen-specific analyses, and generalised estimating equations (GEE) for the global (ie, any) pathogen analyses, with adjustments made for the presence of diarrhoea, location, and their interactions with specimen type., Findings: Between Dec 12, 2014, and Aug 31, 2016, we studied 1519 eligible participants, 1147 (76%) of whom provided stool specimens and 1514 (>99%) provided swab specimens. 871 (76%) of 1147 stool specimens and 1024 (68%) of 1514 swabs were positive for any pathogen (p<0·0001). Comparative yield adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for stool specimens relative to swabs were 1·24 (95% CI 1·11-1·38) in children with diarrhoea at presentation and 1·76 (1·47-2·11) in children without diarrhoea. GEE analysis identified an interaction between the presence of diarrhoea and specimen type (p=0·0011) and collection location (p=0·0078). In an overall yield analysis, pathogen yield was 57% (871 of 1519 children) for stool specimens and 67% (1024 of 1519 children) for rectal swabs, with an unadjusted OR of 0·65 (95% CI 0·59-0·72) for stool relative to swab., Interpretation: Rectal swabs should be done when enteropathogen identification and rapid detection are needed, appropriate molecular diagnostic technology is available, and a stool specimen is not immediately available. In view of their high yield, we urge that the recommendation against the use of rectal swabs as diagnostic specimens be reconsidered., Funding: Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions Team Collaborative Research Innovation Opportunity., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Gastroenteritis remains a common paediatric illness. Little is known about physician knowledge of enteric pathogen diagnostic tests. At the time of study conduct, Alberta lacked a publicly funded rotavirus vaccination program and knowledge of primary care physician perspectives was lacking. We sought to ascertain diagnostic testing methods and to understand knowledge and perceptions regarding enteric pathogen vaccination., Methods: A 30-item electronic survey was distributed across Alberta's five health care zones. The survey was developed by virology, microbiology, paediatrics, family medicine and public health experts. Participants were members of Alberta's Primary Care Networks, the TARRANT network and The Society of General Pediatricians of Greater Edmonton. Study outcomes included: (1) physician knowledge of available diagnostic tests, (2) perspectives regarding stool sample collection and (3) support for an enteric vaccine program., Results: Stool culture was reported as the test to identify parasites (47%), viruses (74%) and Clostridium difficile (67%). Although electron microscopy and enzyme immunoassay were used to identify viruses in Alberta during the study period, only 20% and 48% of respondents respectively identified them as tests employed for such purposes. Stool testing was viewed as being inconvenient (62%; 55/89), whereas rectal swabs were thought to have the potential to significantly improve specimen collection rates (82%; 72/88). Seventy-three per cent (66/90) of the respondent physicians support the adoption of future enteric pathogen vaccines., Conclusions: Simplification of diagnostic testing and stool sample collection could contribute to improved pathogen identification rates. Implementation of an enteric vaccine into the routine paediatric vaccination schedule is supported by the majority of respondents.

Background: The diversity of Canadian infant meningococcal C conjugate (MenC) vaccine programs is unique among countries providing MenC vaccines and offers a valuable opportunity to determine the optimal vaccine program. This longitudinal study assessed differences in seroprotection by 3 different vaccine schedules in children two years after receiving either 1 toddler MenC vaccine dose (1 dose), 1 infant and 1 toddler dose (2 doses), or 2 infant and 1 toddler MenC vaccine dose (3 doses)., Methods: Three similar cohorts of healthy infants from 1, 2 and 3 dose program areas were enrolled before to their 12 month toddler dose and vaccinated with MenC-tetanus toxoid (MenC-TT) conjugate vaccine. Sera obtained 2 years later were assayed for serogroup C bactericidal activity using standardized procedures with rabbit as the exogenous complement source. Serum bactericidal activity titers ≥1:8 were considered protective., Results: Results were available for 384 children. Rates of seroprotection at 36 months of age were significantly different between the 1 and 3 dose programs, but confidence intervals overlapped between the 1 and 2 dose programs and between the 2 and 3 dose programs: 1 dose 92% (95% confidence interval: 86%-96%) versus 99% (95%-100%) with 2 doses and 100% (97%-100%) with 3 doses. Geometric mean titers were significantly different at 12.1 (10.8-13.5), 32.4 (28.9-36.2) and 50.6 (45.7-55.9) in the 1, 2 and 3 dose programs, respectively., Conclusions: At 36 months of age, evidence of seroprotection remained for greater than 90% of participants. Our results indicate that 1 toddler dose or 1 infant plus 1 toddler dose with MenC-TT vaccine provides seroprotection against MenC disease in early childhood.