Search

Importance: Limited data are available on the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice., Objective: To evaluate clinical effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab treatment in children, adults, and older adults with AD with up to 5 years of treatment in daily practice., Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted using the BioDay registry (4 academic and 10 nonacademic hospitals in the Netherlands) to identify patients with AD of all ages who were treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and December 2022., Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical effectiveness was evaluated by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, stratified by children (<18 years), adults (18-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). In addition, time to response, treatment responders, EASI subscores, second treatment episodes, and thymus- and activation-related chemokine and eosinophil levels were assessed. For patients who discontinued dupilumab, the reason for discontinuation was evaluated., Results: In total, 1286 patients with AD (median [IQR] age, 38 [26-54] years; 726 [56.6%] male) were treated with dupilumab, including 130 children, 1025 adults, and 131 older adults. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 87.5 (32.0-157.0) weeks. Most patients maintained controlled AD, with EASI of 7 or lower and NRS for pruritus of 4 or lower varying between 78.6% and 92.3% and 72.2% and 88.2% for up to 5 years of treatment, respectively, while up to 70.5% of all patients prolonged the dosing interval to mostly 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks. Mean EASI and NRS for pruritus were 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2-4.2) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.7-4.3), respectively, after 5 years of treatment. Statistically significant differences between age groups were found over time for EASI and IGA; however, differences were rather small (week 52: EASI, 0.3-1.6; IGA, 0.12-0.26). No statistically significant differences between age groups were found for NRS for pruritus. Median thymus- and activation-related chemokine levels considerably decreased from 1751 pg/mL (95% CI, 1614-1900 pg/mL) to 390 pg/mL (95% CI, 368-413 pg/mL) after 6 months of treatment and remained low. Median eosinophil levels temporarily increased up to week 16, with a subsequently statistically significant decrease over time. In total, 306 patients (23.8%) discontinued dupilumab after a median (IQR) of 54.0 (29.0-110.00) weeks, with adverse events among 98 patients (7.6%) and ineffectiveness among 85 patients (6.6%) as the most frequently reported reasons. Forty-one patients (3.2%) restarted dupilumab, and most of these patients recaptured response., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study with up to 5 years of follow-up, dupilumab maintained its clinical effectiveness, while two-thirds of patients tapered to a dosing interval of every 3 or 4 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in 23.8% of patients mainly due to adverse events and/or ineffectiveness.

Background: Long-term daily practice data on patient-reported benefits of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) remains limited., Objective: To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the safety of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD over a follow-up period of up to 5 years., Methods: Data were extracted from the prospective, multicenter BioDay registry (October 2017-2022) of patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab in daily practice., Results: In total 1223 patients, 1108 adults and 115 pediatric patients were included. After ≥1 year of treatment, mean Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Numeric rating scale (NRS)-pruritus ranged between 7.8 and 8.7, 3.5 and 4.2, and 2.9 and 3.1 in adults, respectively, whilst these patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) ranged between 8.9 and 10.9, 4.4 and 6.4, and 3.0 and 3.7 in pediatric patients, respectively. At follow-up, overall work impairment decreased from 40.1% to 16.3% to 13.3% in adults. Furthermore, class I obesity and itch-dominant patients generally had less favorable treatment response. Of all patients, 66.8% reported ≥1 adverse event, with conjunctivitis being the most common (33.7%)., Limitations: The overall percentage of missing values for selected PROMs was 26% in adults and 46% in pediatric patients., Conclusion: In addition to favorable safety, dupilumab has demonstrated sustained effectiveness across various PROMs, underscoring the treatment benefits from patients' perspectives., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest C.M. Boesjes is a speaker for AbbVie and Eli Lilly. L.S. Spekhorst is a speaker for AbbVie. I.M. Haeck is a consultant, advisory board member, and/or speaker for Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, AbbVie, Janssen, and Eli Lilly. L.F. van der Gang is a speaker for AbbVie. L.P. van der Rijst is a speaker for AbbVie. R.A. Tupker is an advisory board member of Leo Pharma, Eli Lilly, and Novartis. K.Politiek was an advisory board member and/or speaker for AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis, and Sanofi. W. Touwslager is an advisor, consultant, and speaker for Sanofi, Leo Pharma, AbbVie, and Novartis. WA Christoffers is an advisory board member of Leo Pharma. M. de Graaf is a consultant, advisory board member, and/or speaker for AbbVie, Almiral, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi. M.S. de Bruin-Weller is a consultant, advisory board member, and/or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Aslan, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi. M.L.A. Schuttelaar is an advisor, consultant, speaker, and/or investigator for AbbVie, Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Galderma. She has received grants from Regeneron, Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Evidence on the (long-term) safety of systemic immunomodulating therapies in atopic dermatitis (AD) generated by real-world data is sparse., Objectives: To describe real-world reported adverse drug reactions (AEs) related to systemic immunomodulating therapy in patients with AD and to compare the incidence rates of AEs with the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs)., Methods: We conducted an observational prospective multi-centre cohort study, using the TREAT NL registry. All severe AEs, AEs of special interest and serious AEs in adult and paediatric patients on systemic immunomodulating treatment (ciclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, dupilumab, tralokinumab, baricitinib and upadacitinib) were assessed. Incidences rates of all (potentially) drug-related AEs were standardized in patient years and compared to the cumulative incidences in the associated SmPCs., Results: We collected 422 patient years of safety data from 266 patients, of whom 129 (48.5%) reported a total of 224 (potentially) drug-related AEs. Compared to dupilumab's SmPC, higher incidence rates were found for four AEs (reported ≥5 times): eosinophilia, blepharitis, dry eyes and head and neck erythema (i.e. dupilumab facial redness). A higher incidence rate of fatigue was found in patients on oral methotrexate in our cohort compared to the SmPC. Two new drug-related AEs (reported ≥5 times) were found in patients on dupilumab, including non-infectious conjunctivitis and meibomian gland dysfunction., Conclusions: Real-world reported AEs captured in AD patient registries can add information on the estimated incidence of AEs and benefit clinical decision aids. Future studies using data derived from the TREAT NL registry combined with data from other registries within the TREAT Registry Taskforce will provide more information on (rare) AEs associated with immunomodulating therapy in AD patients., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Limited daily practice data on the effect of abrocitinib in patients with atopic dermatitis are available. The aim of this multicentre prospective study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in patients with atopic dermatitis treated in daily practice. In a subgroup, the effectiveness of abrocitinib on hand eczema was evaluated. A total of 103 patients from the BioDay registry were included in the study: week 4 (n = 95), week 16 (n = 61) and week 28 (n = 39). At week 28, the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-50/75/90 was achieved by 81.8%, 57.6%, and 18.2%, respectively, and the weekly average pruritus numerical rating scale ≤ 4 by 62.9%. The effectiveness of abrocitinib was not significantly different between dupilumab non-responders and dupilumab-naïve patients/responders, and between upadacitinib non-responders and upadacitinib-naïve patients/responders. Mean ± standard deviation Hand Eczema Severity Index decreased from 27.4 ± 27.7 at baseline to 7.7 ± 12.1 at week 28 (n = 31). Thirty-two patients (31.1%) discontinued treatment due to ineffectiveness (n = 17), adverse events (n = 9) or both (n = 3). The most frequently reported adverse event was nausea (n = 28). In conclusion, abrocitinib is an effective treatment for atopic dermatitis and can be effective for patients with previous inadequate response to dupilumab or upadacitinib. Furthermore, hand eczema can improve in patients treated with abrocitinib for atopic dermatitis.

Importance: Since the increased use of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice, several cases have been reported on the development of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) and lymphoid infiltrates., Objective: To provide insight in the clinical and histopathologic features of patients with AD clinically suspected for CTCL during dupilumab treatment., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational case series included adult (≥18 years) patients with AD treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and July 2022 at the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands., Main Outcomes and Measures: Relevant patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were evaluated. Skin biopsies before, during, and after treatment were collected and reassessed., Results: Fourteen patients (54.5% male) with a median (IQR) age of 56 (36-66) years suspected for CTCL with deterioration of symptoms during dupilumab treatment were included. Of 14 patients, 3 were retrospectively diagnosed with preexistent mycosis fungoides (MF). Eleven patients with AD were eventually diagnosed with a lymphoid reaction (LR). These patients showed MF-like symptoms; however, histopathologic findings were different, and included sprinkled distribution of small hyperchromatic lymphocytes in the upper epidermal section, a dysregulated CD4:CD8 ratio, and CD30 overexpression, without loss of CD2/CD3/CD5. The median time to clinical worsening was 4.0 months (IQR, 1.4-10.0). Posttreatment biopsies showed complete clearance of the LR in all patients., Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that dupilumab treatment can cause a reversible and benign LR, which mimics a CTCL, though has distinctive histopathologic features.

Clinical trials showed that upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor, is effective for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. However, daily practice studies are limited. This multicentre prospective study evaluated the effectiveness of 16 weeks of upadacitinib treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients, including those with previous inadequate response to dupilumab and/or baricitinib, in daily practice. A total of 47 patients from the Dutch BioDay registry treated with upadacitinib were included. Patients were evaluated at baseline, and after 4, 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Effectiveness was assessed by clinician- and patient-reported outcome measurements. Safety was assessed by adverse events and laboratory assessments. Overall, the probabilities (95% confidence intervals) of achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index ≤ 7 and Numerical Rating Scale - pruritus ≤ 4 were 73.0% (53.7-86.3) and 69.4% (48.7-84.4), respectively. The effectiveness of upadacitinib was comparable in patients with inadequate response to dupilumab and/or baricitinib and in patients who were naïve for these treatments or who had stopped such treatments due to adverse events. Fourteen (29.8%) patients discontinued upadacitinib due to ineffectiveness, adverse events or both (8.5%, 14.9% and 6.4%, respectively). Most frequently reported adverse events were acneiform eruptions (n = 10, 21.3%), herpes simplex (n = 6, 12.8%), nausea and airway infections (both n = 4, 8.5%). In conclusion, upadacitinib is an effective treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, including those with previous inadequate response to dupilumab and/or baricitinib treatment.