Search

Is it important that end-users know the composition of human embryo culture media? We argue that there is as strong case for full transparency concerning the composition of embryo culture media intended for human use. Published data suggest that the composition of embryo culture media may influence the phenotype of the offspring. A review of the literature was carried out. Data concerning the potential effects on embryo development of culture media were assessed and recommendations for users made. The safety of ART procedures, especially with respect to the health of the offspring, is of major importance. There are reports from the literature indicating a possible effect of culture conditions, including culture media, on embryo and fetal development. Since the introduction of commercially available culture media, there has been a rapid development of different formulations, often not fully documented, disclosed or justified. There is now evidence that the environment the early embryo is exposed to can cause reprogramming of embryonic growth leading to alterations in fetal growth trajectory, birthweight, childhood growth and long-term disease including Type II diabetes and cardiovascular problems. The mechanism for this is likely to be epigenetic changes during the preimplantation period of development. In the present paper the ESHRE working group on culture media summarizes the present knowledge of potential effects on embryo development related to culture media, and makes recommendations. There is still a need for large prospective randomized trials to further elucidate the link between the composition of embryo culture media used and the phenotype of the offspring. We do not presently know if the phenotypic changes induced by in vitro embryo culture represent a problem for long-term health of the offspring. Published data indicate that there is a strong case for demanding full transparency concerning the compositions of and the scientific rationale behind the composition of embryo culture media. This work was funded by The European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. No competing interests to declare.

uman organs and tissues differ in regard to their clinical and research uses and the regulatory legislation controlling their use. Organs such as livers and hearts are usually taken from donors who are brain‐dead; in addition, kidneys can also come from live volunteers. Organs decay rapidly and need to be transplanted quickly. Surgeons and coordination teams in transplantation centres control the procurement, while dedicated national and international organisations facilitate their allocation. Human tissues such as bone, skin and heart valves are usually removed from cadavers in hospitals, morgues or even funeral homes and, unlike organs, can be stored—sometimes for years—in tissue banks. These tissues can be used in numerous recipients as and when they are needed. In the early days of human tissue banking, not‐for‐profit banks, mostly located in hospitals, dominated the field. The tissues they stored—heart valves and skin, for example—saved many lives.

no abstract available

This study is a long-term evaluation of the total pregnancy potential of cohorts of fresh and cryopreserved sibling embryos from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles stimulated with either the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue buserelin (BUS) (long protocol) or clomiphene citrate (CC) both in combination with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). Therefore a retrospective analysis was performed on patients who entered the IVF programme between January 1986 and July 1987 and who had triple embryo transfer in the collection cycle. Significantly more fertilized oocytes developed to good-quality embryos in the CC-HMG group (86.1%) than in the BUS-HMG group (80.8%). Transfer of the three morphologically best-looking embryos was performed in day 2 post-insemination in 106 CC-HMG and 80 BUS-HMG cycles. Supernumerary embryos were cultured for a further 24 h and multicellular embryos with up to 20% of fragments were frozen slowly with 1.5 M dimethylsulphoxide on day 3 post-insemination (162 embryos in CC-HMG cycles, 102 embryos in BUS- HMG cycles). Outcome was measured by embryo survival rate, embryo implantation rate and delivery rate in fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Delivery rates were 31.3 and 21.7% per fresh embryo transfer in BUS-HMG and CC- HMG cycles respectively. Fresh embryo implantation rates were significantly higher in collection cycles stimulated with BUS-HMG (17.9%) than in cycles stimulated with CC-HMG (11.3%). Implantation rates were significantly enhanced in embryos transferred in excess of one in cycles leading to pregnancy, perhaps indicative of higher embryo quality in BUS-HMG cycles. Almost all cryopreserved embryos have by now been thawed, so the contribution of frozen embryos to overall pregnancy rates can be evaluated. Overall morphological survival rates of frozen-thawed embryos have by now been thawed, so the contribution of frozen embryos to overall pregnancy rates can be evaluated Overall morphological survival rates of frozen-thawed embryos were similar for 140 embryos from CC-HMG cycles (50%) and 100 embryos from BUS-HMG cycles (46%). The percentage of fully intact embryos was, however, significantly lower in the BUS-HMG group (19%) than in the CC-HMG group (39.5%). Delivery rates were significantly lower following 30 transfers of frozen-thawed embryos from BUS-HMG-stimulated cycles (3.3%) than following 42 transfers of frozen-thawed embryos from CC-HMG cycles (19.1%). Embryo implantation rates were lower for frozen-thawed embryos from BUS-HMG cycles (2.3%) than from CC-HMG cycles (12.7%). Here we demonstrate that ovarian stimulation with the long protocol BUS-HMG instead of the CC-HMG protocol led to higher embryo implantation rates in collection cycles but to lower intact embryo survival rates and to lower embryo implantation rates for frozen sibling embryos. Despite the lower implantation rates with frozen embryos originating from the BUS-HMG protocol, there was no significant difference between total delivery rate per transfer from cycles stimulated with CC-HMG (30.2%) compared with BUS-HMG (33.8%).