Search

Complete revascularization of the culprit and all significant nonculprit lesions in patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD) reduces major adverse cardiac events, but optimal timing of revascularization remains unclear. This study aims to compare immediate complete revascularization (ICR) and staged complete revascularization (SCR) in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS and MVD. This prespecified substudy of the BIOVASC (Percutaneous Complete Revascularization Strategies Using Sirolimus Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Coated Stents in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease) trial included patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD. Risk differences of the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization (UIDR), or cerebrovascular events and its individual components were compared between ICR and SCR at 1 year. The BIOVASC trial enrolled 1,525 patients; 917 patients presented with NSTE-ACS, of whom 459 were allocated to ICR and 458 to SCR. Incidences of the primary composite outcome were similar in the 2 groups (7.9% vs 10.1%; risk difference 2.2%; 95% CI: −1.5 to 6.0; P = 0.15). ICR was associated with a significant reduction of MIs (2.0% vs 5.3%; risk difference 3.3%; 95% CI: 0.9 to 5.7; P = 0.006), which was maintained after exclusion of procedure-related MIs occurring during the index or staged procedure (2.0% vs 4.4%; risk difference 2.4%; 95% CI: 0.1 to 4.7; P = 0.032). UIDRs were also reduced in the ICR group (4.2% vs 7.8%; risk difference 3.5%; 95% CI: 0.4 to 6.6; P = 0.018). ICR is safe in patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD and was associated with a reduction in MIs and UIDRs at 1 year. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remain vulnerable to future major atherosclerotic events after revascularization, despite effective secondary prevention strategies. Inflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of CAD and recurrent events. To date, there is no specific anti-inflammatory medicine available with proven effective, cost-efficient, and favorable benefit-risk profile, except for colchicine. Initial studies with colchicine have sparked major interest in targeting atherosclerotic events with anti-inflammatory agents, but further studies are warranted to enforce the role of colchicine role as a major treatment pillar in CAD. Given colchicine's low cost and established acceptable long-term safety profile, confirming its efficacy through a pragmatic trial holds the potential to significantly impact the global burden of cardiovascular disease. The COL BE PCI trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind, event-driven trial. It will enroll 2,770 patients with chronic or acute CAD treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at 19 sites in Belgium, applying lenient in- and exclusion criteria and including at least 30% female participants. Patients will be randomized between 2 hours and 5 days post-PCI to receive either colchicine 0.5 mg daily or placebo on top of contemporary optimal medical therapy and without run-in period. All patients will have baseline hsCRP measurements and a Second Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART) risk score calculation. The primary endpoint is the time from randomization to the first occurrence of a composite endpoint consisting of all-cause death, spontaneous non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or coronary revascularization. The trial is event-driven and will continue until 566 events have been reached, providing 80% power to detect a 21 % reduction in the primary endpoint taking a premature discontinuation of 15% into account. We expect a trial duration of approximately 44 months. The COL BE PCI Trial aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of administering low-dose colchicine for the secondary prevention in patients with both chronic and acute coronary artery disease undergoing PCI. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06095765., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest related to the content of this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)