Search

Jutta Beier1, Jan van Noord2, Amanda Deans3, Jean Brooks3, Claire Maden3, Suus Baggen4, Rashmi Mehta5, Anthony Cahn31INSAF Respiratory Research Institute, Germany; 2Atrium Medisch Centrum, The Netherlands; 3GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, UK; 4GlaxoSmithKline, Zeist, The Netherlands; 5GlaxoSmithKline, RTP, NC, USABackground: GSK233705 is an inhaled, long-acting muscarinic antagonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study was performed to see if the addition of GSK233705 to salmeterol would provide greater bronchodilation than salmeterol or tiotropium alone in COPD.Methods: In an incomplete-block, three-period, crossover design, dually responsive patients received three of the following five treatments: GSK233705 20 µg plus salmeterol 50 µg twice-daily; GSK233705 50 µg plus salmeterol 50 µg twice-daily; salmeterol 50 µg or placebo, each twice-daily; and tiotropium 18 µg or placebo once-daily for 7 days. Each treatment period was separated by a 14-day washout. The primary efficacy endpoint was morning (trough) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on Day 8, following 7 days of treatment. Secondary endpoints included pulmonary function, plethysmography, pharmacokinetics of GSK233705 and salmeterol, adverse events (AEs), electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs, and laboratory parameters.Results: A total of 47 patients were randomized. The mean % predicted normal postbronchodilator FEV1 was 55% at screening. Compared with placebo (n = 24), the adjusted mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 on Day 8 was 215 mL higher with GSK233705 20 µg + salmeterol (n = 23) and 203 mL higher with GSK233705 50 µg + salmeterol (n = 27), whereas with salmeterol (n = 27) and tiotropium (n = 28) the changes were 101 mL and 118 mL higher, respectively. The primary efficacy results were supported by the results from the other secondary lung function assessments. AEs were reported by similar proportions of patients across the treatment groups, with headache the most frequently reported treatment-related AE reported by one subject receiving each of GSK233705 20 µg + salmeterol, tiotropium, and placebo. No significant differences were seen in vital signs, ECGs, or laboratory parameters between the groups.Conclusion: The addition of GSK233705 to salmeterol in partially reversible COPD patients resulted in greater bronchodilation than salmeterol or tiotropium alone and was well tolerated.Keywords: COPD, bronchodilation, dual therapy, LAMA, LABA

Background: A study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tiotropium and ipratropium during long term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods: 288 patients of mean (SD) age 65 (8) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 41 (12)% predicted participated in a 14 centre, double blind, double dummy, parallel group study and were randomised after a run in period of two weeks to receive either tiotropium 18 microg once daily from a dry powder inhaler (HandiHaler; two thirds of patients) or ipratropium 40 microg four times daily from a metered dose inhaler (one third of patients) for a period of 13 weeks. Outcome measures were lung function, daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), and the use of concomitant salbutamol. FEV(1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured one hour before and immediately before inhalation (mean value of the two measurements on test day 1 was the baseline value while on all other test days it was known as the trough FEV(1) and FVC), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after inhalation of the study drug on days 1, 8, 50, and 92.Results: During treatment tiotropium achieved a significantly greater improvement than ipratropium (p<0.05) in trough, average, and peak FEV(1) levels and in trough and average FVC levels. The trough FEV(1) response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.15 l (95% CI 0.11 to 0.19) and 0.16 l (95% CI 0.12 to 0.20) for tiotropium and between 0.01 l (95% CI -0.03 to 0.05) and 0.03 l (95% CI 0.01 to 0. 07) for ipratropium. The trough FVC response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.34 l (95% CI 0.28 to 0.40) and 0.39 l (95% CI 0.31 to 0.47) for tiotropium and between 0.08 l (95% CI 0.00 to 0.16) and 0.18 l (95% CI 0.08 to 0.28) for ipratropium. On all test days tiotropium produced a greater improvement in FEV(1) than ipratropium starting three hours after inhalation (p<0.05). During treatment weekly mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was consistently better in the tiotropium group than in the ipratropium group, the difference in morning PEF being significant up through week 10 and in evening PEF up through week 7 of treatment (p<0.05). The use of concomitant salbutamol was also lower in the tiotropium group (p<0.05). The only drug related adverse event was dry mouth (tiotropium 14.7%, ipratropium 10.3% of patients).Conclusions: Tiotropium in a dose of 18 microg inhaled once daily using the HandiHaler was significantly more effective than 40 microg ipratropium four times daily in improving trough, average, and peak lung function over the 13 week period. The safety profile of tiotropium was similar to ipratropium. These data support the use of tiotropium as first line treatment for the long term maintenance treatment of patients with airflow obstruction due to COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Seventeen years after a previous study of doxycycline in acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, a similar investigation was repeated. Forty patients with bacteri-ologically proven infections were given 100 mg doxycycline twice daily (by mouth) for ten days. The clinical results in infections were excellent as were those with , but one patient developed septicaemia with a resistant pneumococcus while under therapy. Treatment was unsuccessful in a third of the patients with infections. Overall, excellent or good results were recorded in 74% of patients at the end of treatment, and in 64% a week later. Doxycycline is still a useful oral antibiotic in this condition and possibly the best for infections, especially with β-lactamase producing strains. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Thirty hospitalised patients with acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis were treated orally with either 750 or 1000 mg of sultamicillin (a mutual prodrug of ampicillin and sulbactam) twice daily for ten days. Twenty-eight of these patients were evaluated for clinical response at end-of-treatment (day 11) and at one week post-treatment (day 17). The overall clinical cure rates at these times were 73% (22/30) and 60% (18/30) respectively. Five beta-lactamase-producing organisms were identified in the pre-treatment sputum specimens, but all were eliminated by day 17. The means of the peak serum concentrations of ampicillin achieved after the first 750 and 1000 mg doses were 9.1 and 14.4 mg/l respectively, the corresponding values for sulbactam being 6.4 and 7.9 mg/l. Both the ampicillin and the sulbactam peaks occurred approximately one hour after dosage. Mean peak sputum concentrations of ampicillin of 0.7 and 1.2 mg/l were achieved following the 750 and 1000 mg doses. Concentrations of sulbactam in sputum were above the limit of detection (0.5 mg/l) in only four patients. Although both clinical and bacteriological responses at follow-up (day 17) appeared to be somewhat more favourable at the higher dose, the small number of patients in each group did not permit a statistically valid comparison to be made. One patient in each dosage group discontinued the medication because of severe diarrhoea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two groups of patients were treated with ceftazidime intramuscularly for 10 days. There were 34 patients with acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis of whom 20 received 1-g and the other 14 2-g injections. A further 38 patients with chronic recurrent respiratory infections (mostly severe bronchiectasis associated with Pseudomonas aeruginasa) were treated with 2-g injections twice or thrice daily. Blood and sputum concentrations of ceftazidime were measured microbiologically on the first day of treatment. The peak serum concentrations (34.4 and 37.8 mg/l after the 2 different doses) were reached between ½ and 1 h after the injections and the mean areas under the concentration-time curves were 131 mg/l. h and 149 mg/l. h, respectively. The sputum concentrations after the 2 doses reached 3.0 mg/l after 1 g, and 3.5 mg/l after the 2 g doses.Sputum cultures before and after treatment showed that 32 of the 34 patients with chronic bronchitis had negative cultures at the end of the treatment although 6 had further infections by the 17th study day. Among the 38 patients with relapsing infections with Gram-negative organisms, one died early in the treatment course and one later on, but 28 of the 37 patients had negative sputum cultures on day 11 and 17 of the 36 remaining were clear of infection on day 17. The recurrences were all associated with Ps. aeruginosa or Ps. maltophilia.Some 69% of the 69 Ps. aeruginosa strains were inhibited by 2 mg/l of ceftadizime and 91% by 4 mg/l. All 3 Ps. maltophilia strains were resistant (MICs > 32 mg/l). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Introduction Symptoms profoundly impact daily life of COPD patients. We assessed the influence of the once-daily (qd) long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide) on symptoms and exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Methods Patients were randomised (2:1) to 26 weeks double-blind treatment with NVA237 50 µg qd or placebo (PBO) via a single-dose dry powder inhaler (Breezhaler® device). Efficacy was assessed by bronchodilation (trough FEV1 at Week 12), breathlessness on the transition dyspnoea index (TDI), HRQoL via the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and rescue medication use. The effect on COPD exacerbations and related hospitalisations was also assessed. Results 822 patients were randomised; 80.5% completed. NVA237 significantly increased total TDI focal score vs PBO at Week 26 (difference 1.04, 95% CI 0.583 to 1.504; p<0.0001); exceeding the minimum clinically important difference ([MCID] =1 point). Significantly more patients achieved MCID in TDI score with NVA237 (61.3% vs 48.3%; OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.249 to 2.415; p=0.001). SGRQ total score was significantly reduced with NVA237 (2.81; p=0.004); % of patients achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in SGRQ (=4 point reduction) was significantly higher with NVA237 (56.8% vs 46.3%; OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.138 to 2.196; p=0.006). NVA237 significantly reduced rescue medication use at Week 26 (-0.46 puffs/day, p=0.005). NVA237 significantly prolonged time to first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation by 31% (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.949; p=0.023) and time to first severe COPD exacerbation necessitating hospitalisation (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.141 to 0.857; p=0.022). NVA237 significantly reduced hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbation (OR 0.34; p=0.024). Conclusion Once-daily NVA237 provided significant improvements in dyspnoea and SGRQ total score, with lower rescue medication use, and reduced risk of exacerbation and associated hospitalisations vs PBO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current guidelines recommend long-acting bronchodilators as maintenance therapy in COPD when symptoms are not adequately controlled with short-acting agents. Olodaterol is a novel long-acting β(2)-adrenoceptor agonist with a pre-clinical profile that suggests 24-h bronchodilation may be achieved with once-daily administration., Objective: To assess dose- and time-response in terms of bronchodilator efficacy, and to evaluate pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of single doses of olodaterol administered via Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ Inhaler in COPD patients., Methods: A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-way crossover study including 24-h spirometry (FEV(1), FVC), safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (in a subset of patients) following dosing of olodaterol 2 μg, 5 μg, 10 μg and 20 μg; the washout period between test-days was at least 14 days. Primary endpoint of the study was the 24-h post-dosing FEV(1). Patients participating in the pharmacokinetic assessments continued in an open-label extension phase to establish pharmacokinetics of olodaterol 40 μg., Results: 36 patients were assigned to treatment; mean baseline prebronchodilator FEV(1) was 1.01 L (37% predicted normal). All doses of olodaterol provided significantly greater bronchodilation compared to placebo in 24-h FEV(1) post-dose (p < 0.001); a clear dose-response relationship was observed, with values ranging from 0.070 L for olodaterol 2 μg to 0.119 L for olodaterol 20 μg. Similarly, olodaterol was superior to placebo (p < 0.001) in peak FEV(1) (0.121 L to 0.213 L) and average FEV(1) both during the daytime (0-12 h; ranging from 0.099 L to 0.184 L) and night-time (12-24 h; ranging from 0.074 L to 0.141 L). FVC results were consistent with those observed for FEV(1). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the peak plasma concentrations and renal excretion suggested no obvious deviation from dose-proportionality over the investigated dose range of 2 μg-40 μg; in most patients, no plasma levels could be detected following the 2 μg dose. All treatments were well tolerated with no apparent dose relation in terms of adverse events., Conclusions: Olodaterol appears to be a promising long-acting β(2)-adrenoceptor agonist,with bronchodilation maintained over 24 h that offers an opportunity for once-daily dosing in patients who require maintenance bronchodilator therapy for the management of COPD symptoms., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical information on 24-h spirometric efficacy of combining tiotropium and salmeterol compared to single-agent therapy is lacking in patients with COPD., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover study of 6-week treatment periods comparing combination therapy of tiotropium 18 microg plus qd or bid salmeterol 50 microg versus single-agent therapy. Serial 24-h spirometry (FEV(1), FVC), effects on dyspnea (TDI focal score) and rescue salbutamol use were evaluated in 95 patients., Results: Tiotropium plus qd salmeterol was superior to tiotropium or salmeterol alone in average FEV(1) (0-24h) by 72 mL and 97 mL (p<0.0001), respectively. Compared to this qd regimen, combination therapy including bid salmeterol provided comparable daytime (0-12h: 12 mL, p=0.38) bronchodilator effects, but significantly more bronchodilation during the night-time (12-24h: 73 mL, p<0.0001). Clinically relevant improvements in TDI focal score were achieved with bronchodilator combinations including salmeterol qd or bid (2.56 and 2.71; p<0.005 versus components). Symptom benefit of combination therapies was also reflected in less need for reliever medication. All treatments were well tolerated., Conclusion: Compared to single-agent therapy, combination therapy of tiotropium plus salmeterol in COPD provided clinically meaningful improvements in airflow obstruction and dyspnea as well as a reduction in reliever medication., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tiotropium, a once daily inhaled anticholinergic delivered via HandiHaler, provides bronchodilation for >24h and improves patient-centred outcomes. The Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI), a novel, propellant-free inhaler, has been developed and proposed as an alternative delivery device for use with tiotropium., Methods: In a pre-specified, pooled analysis of two 30-week, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover studies, 207 patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) were randomised to receive once daily tiotropium 5 microg or 10 microg (aqueous solution delivered via Respimat SMI), tiotropium 18 microg (inhalation powder via HandiHaler) or placebo. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) response. Forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), rescue medication use, safety and pharmacokinetics (in a subgroup of patients) were also assessed., Results: Both tiotropium doses delivered by Respimat SMI were significantly superior to placebo and non-inferior to tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler on the primary endpoint (all p<0.0001). All active treatments were significantly superior to placebo (all p<0.0001) and both doses of tiotropium Respimat SMI were non-inferior to tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler on the secondary spirometry variables and rescue medication use. The systemic exposure was similar between tiotropium 5 microg Respimat SMI and tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler but was higher for tiotropium 10 microg Respimat SMI. All active treatments were well tolerated., Conclusions: Tiotropium 5 microg Respimat SMI is comparable with tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler in terms of efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety. Respimat SMI is an effective alternative, multi-dose delivery device for tiotropium.

The aim of this paper is to assess the health economic consequences of substituting ipratropium with the new, once-daily bronchodilator tiotropium in patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This prospective cost-effectiveness analysis was performed alongside two 1-yr randomised, double-blind clinical trials in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients had a diagnosis of COPD and a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < or = 65% predicted normal. Patients were randomised to tiotropium (18 microg once daily) or ipratropium (2 puffs of 20 microg administered four times daily) in a ratio of 2:1. The mean number of exacerbations was reduced from 1.01 in the ipratropium group (n = 175) to 0.74 in the tiotropium group (n = 344). The percentages of patients with a relevant improvement on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were 34.6% and 51.2%, respectively. Compared to ipratropium, the number of hospital admissions, hospital days and unscheduled visits to healthcare providers was reduced by 46%, 42% and 36% respectively. Mean annual healthcare costs including the acquisition cost of the study drugs were 1721 Euro (SEM 160) in the tiotropium group and 1,541 Euro (SEM 163) in the ipratropium group (difference 180 Euro). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 667 Euro per exacerbation avoided and 1084 Euro per patient with a relevant improvement on the SGRQ. Substituting tiotropium for ipratropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients offers improved health outcomes and is associated with increased costs of 180 Euro per patient per year.

Tiotropium (Spiriva) is a new once-daily inhaled anticholinergic that has its effect through prolonged muscarinic (M)3 receptor antagonism. It has a clinically documented, long duration of action with once-daily dosing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A single-centre, double-blind, ipratropium-controlled study was conducted in order to characterize the onset of pharmacodynamic steady state of tiotropium in patients with COPD. Thirty-one patients (25 male, six female) with a mean age of 62 yrs and a mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 1.13 L (38% of predicted) were randomly assigned to receive either tiotropium 18 microg once-daily from a dry-powder inhaler (HandiHaler, 20 patients), or ipratropium 40 microg four-times daily from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (11 patients) for a period of 1 week. FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured 1 h prior to, and just before inhalation (mean value of the two measurements on test-day 1 was the baseline value, while on all other test days it was the trough value), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h after inhalation of the morning dose of the study drug (one capsule and two puffs) on days 1, 2, 3, and 8. Trough FEV1 following 8 days of tiotropium was 0.19 L (18%) above baseline. Approximately 90% of this increase was achieved within 24 h of the first dose (0.17 L, 16%). Trough FVC increased 0.67 L (27%) on test-day 8. Approximately 70% of the improvement was observed after two tiotropium doses (0.47 L, 19%). Achievement of FVC steady state was delayed compared to FEV1. Ipratropium performed typically with an onset of action within 30 min, a peak response between 1-2 h postdosing and a duration of action of approximately 4 h. It was concluded that forced expiratory volume in one second steady state with tiotropium is reached within 48 h, while continued improvements in forced vital capacity can be expected over or beyond the first week of therapy. The continued increases in forced vital capacity beyond 48 h suggests that maintenance bronchodilator therapy is required to achieve maximal changes in hyperinflation.

Tiotropium, a novel once-daily inhaled anticholinergic, has been shown to improve lung function over a 24-h period. In order to extend these findings, health-outcomes were evaluated over 1 yr in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Spirometric results, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), salbutamol use and effects on dyspnoea, health-related quality of life and COPD exacerbations were assessed in two identical 1-yr randomized double-blind double-dummy studies of tiotropium 18 microg once daily (n=356) compared with ipratropium 40 microg q.i.d. (n=179). Screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were 1.25+/-0.43 L (41.9+/-12.7% of the predicted value) (tiotropium) and 1.18+/-0.37 L (39.4+/-10.7% pred) (ipratropium). Trough FEV1 at 1 yr improved by 0.12+/-0.01 L with tiotropium and declined by 0.03+/-0.02 L with ipratropium (p<0.001). Significant improvement in PEFR, salbutamol use, Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total and impact scores were seen with tiotropium (p<0.01). Tiotropium reduced the number of exacerbations (by 24%, p<0.01), and increased time to first exacerbation (p<0.01) and time to first hospitalization for a COPD exacerbation (p<0.05) compared with ipratropium. Apart from an increased incidence of dry mouth in the tiotropium group, adverse events were similar between treatments. Tiotropium was effective in improving dyspnoea, exacerbations, health-related quality of life and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and exceeds the benefits seen with ipratropium. The data support the use of tiotropium once-daily as first-line maintenance treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The efficacy and safety of salmeterol alone was compared with the combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium and with placebo during long-term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition, the single-dose effect in response to the first dose of treatment was studied over 12 h. The patients (n=144; age 64+/-7 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 44+/-11% pred) participated in a three-centre double-blind double-placebo parallel group study and were randomized after a run-in period of 2 weeks to receive either salmeterol 50 microg b.i.d., salmeterol 5 microg b.i.d. plus ipratropium 40 microg q.i.d. or placebo for a period of 12 weeks. The single-dose study demonstrated that salmeterol produced a significant increase in FEV1 (peak of 7% pred) and specific airway conductance (sGaw) (maximum of 60% baseline) for > or =12 h. The combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium elicited a greater bronchodilator response (11% and 94% increases respectively) than salmeterol alone during the first 6 h after inhalation. During treatment there were significant improvements in daytime symptom scores and morning peak expiratory flow in both the salmeterol and the salmeterol plus ipratropium groups (p<0.001), with an associated decrease in the use of rescue salbutamol. Improvements in FEV1 and sGaw were greater in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group than in the patients receiving only salmeterol. Thirty-five patients had an exacerbation; 11 (23%) in the salmeterol group (versus placebo NS), six (13%) in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group (versus placebo p<0.01) and 18 (36%) in the placebo group. In conclusion, in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long-term treatment with either salmeterol alone or salmeterol plus ipratropium is safe and effective. There was added benefit from the combination therapy in terms of improvement in airways obstruction, but not for improvement in symptom control or need for rescue salbutamol.

Background: The phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) for metered dose inhalers (MDIs) has prompted the development of alternative propellants and the design of propellant-free devices for inhalation therapy., Objective: This study was carried out to determine the dose of fenoterol inhaled from Respimat (RMT), a new propellant-free soft mist inhaler, which is equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety to 1 puff of either 100 or 200 microg fenoterol inhaled from a conventional CFC-MDI (Berotec)., Methods: Sixty-two asthmatic patients (35 male, 27 female) with a mean baseline FEV(1) of 1.7 liters, corresponding to 55% of the predicted normal value, were randomized at two study centers to 4 of a total of 8 possible treatments: placebo; 12.5, 25, 50, 100, or 200 microg fenoterol via RMT, and 100 or 200 microg fenoterol delivered via the MDI., Results: Fifty-nine patients completed the study as planned. Results of the therapeutic equivalence test for the primary endpoint, average FEV(1) (AUC(0-6))/6 and for the secondary endpoint, peak FEV(1), showed that the 12.5- and 25-microg fenoterol doses administered via RMT were equivalent to the 100 microg fenoterol dose from the MDI. The 50-, 100- and 200-microg fenoterol doses delivered by RMT did not meet the criterion for therapeutic equivalence with the 100-microg dose from the MDI, and if tested for a difference would have been significantly different in favor of RMT. All 5 RMT fenoterol doses were therapeutically equivalent to the MDI 200-microg fenoterol dose. Headache, reported by 4 patients on test days and 2 patients between test days in those randomized to RMT, was the most common adverse event, but the active treatments were generally well tolerated with no dose-dependent increases in incidence or severity of adverse events observed., Conclusions: The results from the study suggest that safe and efficacious bronchodilation can be obtained from single-dose fenoterol administered via RMT. Use of lower absolute doses to obtain a clinically significant improvement in pulmonary function may be possible because of the increased lung deposition achievable with the novel soft mist inhaler., (Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel)