Search

We compared different LLMs, notably chatGPT, GPT4, and Google Bard and we tested whether their performance differs in subspeciality domains, in executing examinations from four different courses of the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) notably anatomy/embryology, neuro-oncology, head and neck and pediatrics. Written exams of ESNR were used as input data, related to anatomy/embryology (30 questions), neuro-oncology (50 questions), head and neck (50 questions), and pediatrics (50 questions). All exams together, and each exam separately were introduced to the three LLMs: chatGPT 3.5, GPT4, and Google Bard. Statistical analyses included a group-wise Friedman test followed by a pair-wise Wilcoxon test with multiple comparison corrections. Overall, there was a significant difference between the 3 LLMs (p < 0.0001), with GPT4 having the highest accuracy (70%), followed by chatGPT 3.5 (54%) and Google Bard (36%). The pair-wise comparison showed significant differences between chatGPT vs GPT 4 (p < 0.0001), chatGPT vs Bard (p < 0. 0023), and GPT4 vs Bard (p < 0.0001). Analyses per subspecialty showed the highest difference between the best LLM (GPT4, 70%) versus the worst LLM (Google Bard, 24%) in the head and neck exam, while the difference was least pronounced in neuro-oncology (GPT4, 62% vs Google Bard, 48%). We observed significant differences in the performance of the three different LLMs in the running of official exams organized by ESNR. Overall GPT 4 performed best, and Google Bard performed worst. This difference varied depending on subspeciality and was most pronounced in head and neck subspeciality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The global surge in aging populations has intensified osteoporosis challenges, necessitating improved diagnostic methods. While dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the conventional standard in assessing bone mineral density (BMD), the exploration of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has been proposed, particularly phantomless techniques. Challenges in single-energy CT, emphasizing internal calibration standards like subcutaneous fat, are discussed. Advances in PL-QCT, notably with automatic region of interest (ROI) selection, show improved accuracy. Dual-energy CT (DECT) introduces new dimensions for musculoskeletal analysis. Despite advancements, challenges persist, including interindividual variability and patient-specific factors. Evolving single-energy CT and DECT techniques show promise in refining BMD assessment and osteoporosis diagnosis, enhancing patient care. Continued research and integration into clinical practice are vital for realizing these advancements' full benefits. In this review, we evaluate and summarize current evidence on the feasibility and different approaches to achieve analysis of BMD with phantomless QCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain spaces around (perivascular spaces) and alongside (paravascular or Virchow–Robin spaces) vessels have gained significant attention in recent years due to the advancements of in vivo imaging tools and to their crucial role in maintaining brain health, contributing to the anatomic foundation of the glymphatic system. In fact, it is widely accepted that peri- and para-vascular spaces function as waste clearance pathways for the brain for materials such as ß-amyloid by allowing exchange between cerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid. Visible brain spaces on magnetic resonance imaging are often a normal finding, but they have also been associated with a wide range of neurological and systemic conditions, suggesting their potential as early indicators of intracranial pressure and neurofluid imbalance. Nonetheless, several aspects of these spaces are still controversial. This article offers an overview of the current knowledge and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of peri- and para-vascular spaces, which can help in daily clinical practice image description and interpretation. This paper is organized into different sections, including the microscopic anatomy of peri- and para-vascular spaces, their associations with pathological and physiological events, and their differential diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]