Search

Purpose: In tamoxifen-treated individuals, reduced-function genetic variants in the CYP2D6 gene or inhibition of the enzyme result in low circulating endoxifen concentrations. We assessed the impact of reduced CYP2D6 activity and circulating endoxifen concentrations on breast cancer outcomes., Patients and Methods: Patients with locally advanced or stage IV hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were enrolled in this single arm phase II trial and received open label tamoxifen 20 mg PO daily. The primary objective was to assess CYP2D6 poor metabolizer (PM) vs intermediate and normal metabolizer status (IM + NM) with progression-free survival (PFS). CYP2D6 phenotype was determined from whole blood samples (Roche Amplichip), and secondary endpoint evaluated endoxifen concentrations determined from 3 month post registration plasma samples (Quest Diagnostics)., Results: From September 2010 to June 2013, 113 of planned 204 patients were registered to the trial and began protocol treatment. Accrual to the trial closed early due to lower-than-expected rate of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. Median age was 62, 86% (97/113) were white, 33% (30/113) Hispanic, 83% (92/113) postmenopausal. Samples were evaluable for CYP2D6 in 75% (85/113) of patients (2/85 PM, 27/85 IM, and 56/85 NM). Median PFS for PM and IM + NM was 12.9 months and 6.9 months, respectively. Median PFS was 11.1 and 13.8 months respectively for patients with low (≤ 15.5) and high (> 15.5) endoxifen concentrations (ng/ml)., Conclusion: We did not observe significant associations between CYP2D6 metabolizer status or endoxifen with PFS. Small sample sizes and barriers to adequate samples in this trial prohibited determination of relationship between these markers and PFS., Trial Id: NCT01124695 (registered May 14, 2010)., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors report the following competing interests, all outside the submitted work. VS: Received research grants to institution from Abbvie, Biocept, Pfizer, Novartis, Puma Biotechnology, and QUE Oncology; In kind clinical trial assays from Foundation Medicine; Advisory board: Novartis. Chair, Data Safety Monitoring Board, AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. AO: None. BPS: Research support (drug only) from Genentech and Pfizer. Research support (testing support only) from Foundation Medicine and Epic Sciences, all outside the submitted work. TCS: None. MCL: Received research grants to institution from Eisai, Exact Sciences, Genentech, Genomic Health, GRAIL, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Merck, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro; Honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, Genomic Health, GRAIL, Ionis, Merck, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Syndax to institution. Travel support from AstraZeneca, Genomic Health, Ionis; Employment and stock options Natera Inc., all outside the submitted work. CL: In kind clinical trial research support from Veracyte (formerly Nanostring). Advisory board: Novartis. Data safety monitoring board: SBI ALApharma, all outside the submitted work. MPG: MPG is the Erivan K. Haub Family Professor of Cancer Research Honoring Richard F. Emslander, M.D. and reports personal fees for CME activities from Research to Practice, Clinical Education Alliance, Medscape, and MJH Life Sciences; personal fees serving as a panelist for a panel discussion from Total Health Conferencing and personal fees for serving as a moderator for Curio Science; consulting fees to Mayo Clinic from ARC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Biotheranostics, Blueprint Medicines, Lilly, Rna Diagnostics, Sanofi Genzyme, Seattle Genetics and Engage Health Media; and grant funding to Mayo Clinic from Lilly, Pfizer, Sermonix, Loxo, AstraZeneca and ATOSSA Therapeutics. He is an inventor on a patent application entitled “Degrading PKCb1 to Treat Cancer.” CSV: None. JAS: None. DV: Honoraria and advisory boards from Janssen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Abbvie, Roche, Kite/Gilead, BMS/Celgene, Zetagen, Merck, Incyte. Research funding (to the institution): Roche, AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. PS: None. PSC: None. DFM: None. GWS: Employment Caris Life Sciences, all outside the submitted work. The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: E3108 received approval from each of the participating sites. Consent to participate: A written informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in E3108 for participation and publication., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Infections with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 account for ~70% of invasive cervical cancers but the degree of protection from naturally acquired anti-HPV antibodies is uncertain. We examined the risk of HPV infections as defined by HPV DNA detection and cervical abnormalities among women >25 years in the Human Papilloma VIrus Vaccine Immunogenicity ANd Efficacy trial's (VIVIANE, NCT00294047) control arm., Methods: Serum anti-HPV-16/18 antibodies were determined at baseline and every 12 months in baseline DNA-negative women (N = 2687 for HPV-16 and 2705 for HPV-18) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from blood samples. HPV infections were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) every 6-months, and cervical abnormalities were confirmed by cytology every 12 months. Data were collected over a 7-year period. The association between the risk of type-specific infection and cervical abnormalities and serostatus was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Risk of newly detected HPV-16-associated 6-month persistent infections (PI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56 [95%CI:0.32; 0.99]) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US+) (HR = 0.28 [0.12; 0.67]) were significantly lower in baseline seropositive vs baseline seronegative women. HPV-16-associated incident infections (HR = 0.81 [0.56; 1.16]) and 12-month PI (HR = 0.53 [0.24; 1.16]) showed the same trend. A similar trend of lower risk was observed in HPV-18-seropositive vs -seronegative women (HR = 0.95 [0.59; 1.51] for IIs, HR = 0.43 [0.16; 1.13] for 6-month PIs, HR = 0.31 [0.07; 1.36] for 12-month PIs, and HR = 0.61 [0.23; 1.61] for ASC-US+)., Conclusions: Naturally acquired anti-HPV-16 antibodies were associated with a decreased risk of subsequent infection and cervical abnormalities in women >25 years. This possible protection was lower than that previously reported in 15- to 25-year-old women., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Premature menopause is a serious long-term side effect of chemotherapy. We evaluated long-term pregnancy and disease-related outcomes for patients in S0230/POEMS, a study in premenopausal women with stage I-IIIA estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer to be treated with cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy. Women were randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy with or without goserelin, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, and were stratified by age and chemotherapy regimen. All statistical tests were two-sided. Of 257 patients, 218 were eligible and evaluable (105 in the chemotherapy + goserelin arm and 113 in the chemotherapy arm). More patients in the chemotherapy + goserelin arm reported at least one pregnancy vs the chemotherapy arm (5-year cumulative incidence = 23.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.3% to 31.9%; and 12.2%, 95% CI = 6.8% to 19.2%, respectively; odds ratio = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.07 to 5.11; P = .03). Randomization to goserelin + chemotherapy was associated with a nonstatistically significant improvement in disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.10; P = .09) and overall survival (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.04; P = .06). In this long-term analysis of POEMS/S0230, we found continued evidence that patients randomly assigned to receive goserelin + chemotherapy were not only more likely to avoid premature menopause, but were also more likely to become pregnant without adverse effect on disease-related outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly prevalent malignancy in Latin American women, most cases being diagnosed at locally advanced or metastatic stages when options for cancer care are limited. Despite its label as a public health problem in the region, Latin American BC patients face several barriers in accessing standard of care treatment when compared with patients from developed countries. In this review, we analyse the landscape of the four main identified barriers in the region: i) high burden of locally advanced/advanced BC; ii) inadequate access to medical resources; iii) deficient access to specialised cancer care and iv) insufficient BC research in Latin America. Unfortunately, these barriers represent the main factors associated with the BC poor outcomes seen in the region. Targeted actions should be conducted independently by each country and as a region to overcome these limitations and create an enhanced model of BC care.

Background: There are well-known differences in gender outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other cancers. In this work, we evaluated several randomised clinical trials to explore the gender influence in the outcome of patients with NSCLC treated with targeted therapy and immunotherapy., Methods: We performed a series of meta-analysis to compare the gender outcome in the routine setting for overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) in phase III randomised clinical trials comparing EGFR inhibitors versus chemotherapy (OPTIMAL, LUX-lung 3, LUX-lung 6, EURTAC, ENSURE and WTJOG); ALK inhibitors versus chemotherapy (ASCEND 4, ASCEND 5, PROFILE 1014 and NCT009323893) and anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy (CheckMate 017, CheckMate 026, CheckMate 057, KEYNOTE 010 and KEYNOTE 024)., Results: Female patients with NSCLC have a reduced risk of death compared with men (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79; p<0.00001). Women had a better benefit from EGFR inhibitors than men (HR=0.34; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.40; p<0.00001 vs HR=0.44; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.56; p<0.00001, respectively). The benefit from ALK inhibitors was similar for both genders (HR=0.51; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.61; p<0.00001 vs HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.59; p<0.00001, for women and men, respectively). Anti-PD1 inhibitors significantly improved the PFS in male patients when compared with chemotherapy (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86; p<0.00001); in contrast, women showed no benefit in 5/5 randomised trials (HR=1.03; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.20; p=0.69)., Conclusions: In this exploratory study, some targeted treatments were influenced by gender. Despite differences in outcomes that could be attributed to different histology, EGFR and smoking status, gender should be evaluated more deeply as prognostic variable in patients with NSCLC., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background: Although the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is greatest in young women, women older than 25 years remain at risk. We present data from the VIVIANE study of the HPV 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in adult women after 7 years of follow-up., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, healthy women older than 25 years were enrolled (age stratified: 26-35 years, 36-45 years, and ≥46 years). Up to 15% in each age stratum had a history of HPV infection or disease. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive HPV 16/18 vaccine or aluminium hydroxide control, with an internet-based system. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or greater (CIN1+) associated with HPV 16/18. We did analyses in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy and total vaccinated cohort. Data for the combined primary endpoint in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96·2% CI around the point estimate was greater than 30%. For all other endpoints and cohorts, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96·2% CI was greater than 0%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294047., Findings: The first participant was enrolled on Feb 16, 2006, and the last study visit took place on Jan 29, 2014. 4407 women were in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy (n=2209 vaccine, n=2198 control) and 5747 women in the total vaccinated cohort (n=2877 vaccine, n=2870 control). At month 84, in women seronegative for the corresponding HPV type in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy, vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or CIN1+ associated with HPV 16/18 was significant in all age groups combined (90·5%, 96·2% CI 78·6-96·5). Vaccine efficacy against HPV 16/18-related cytological abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and CIN1+ was also significant. We also noted significant cross-protective efficacy against 6-month persistent infection with HPV 31 (65·8%, 96·2% CI 24·9-85·8) and HPV 45 (70·7%, 96·2% CI 34·2-88·4). In the total vaccinated cohort, vaccine efficacy against CIN1+ irrespective of HPV was significant (22·9%, 96·2% CI 4·8-37·7). Serious adverse events related to vaccination occurred in five (0·2%) of 2877 women in the vaccine group and eight (0·3%) of 2870 women in the control group., Interpretation: In women older than 25 years, the HPV 16/18 vaccine continues to protect against infections, cytological abnormalities, and lesions associated with HPV 16/18 and CIN1+ irrespective of HPV type, and infection with non-vaccine types HPV 31 and HPV 45 over 7 years of follow-up., Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

There are different biological and clinical patterns of lung cancer between genders indicating intrinsic differences leading to increased sensitivity to cigarette smoke-induced DNA damage, mutational patterns of KRAS and better clinical outcomes in women while differences between genders at gene-expression levels was not previously reported. Here we show an enrichment of immune genes in NSCLC in women compared to men. We found in a GSEA analysis (by biological processes annotated from Gene Ontology) of six public datasets a repeated observation of immune gene sets enrichment in women. "Immune system process", "immune response", "defense response", "cellular defense response" and "regulation of immune system process" were the gene sets most over-represented while APOBEC3G, APOBEC3F, LAT, CD1D and CCL5 represented the top-five core genes. Characterization of immune cell composition with the platform CIBERSORT showed no differences between genders; however, there were differences when tumor tissues were compared to normal tissues. Our results suggest different immune responses in NSCLC between genders that could be related with the different clinical outcome.

Background: Ovarian failure is a common toxic effect of chemotherapy. Studies of the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to protect ovarian function have shown mixed results and lack data on pregnancy outcomes., Methods: We randomly assigned 257 premenopausal women with operable hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer to receive standard chemotherapy with the GnRH agonist goserelin (goserelin group) or standard chemotherapy without goserelin (chemotherapy-alone group). The primary study end point was the rate of ovarian failure at 2 years, with ovarian failure defined as the absence of menses in the preceding 6 months and levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the postmenopausal range. Rates were compared with the use of conditional logistic regression. Secondary end points included pregnancy outcomes and disease-free and overall survival., Results: At baseline, 218 patients were eligible and could be evaluated. Among 135 with complete primary end-point data, the ovarian failure rate was 8% in the goserelin group and 22% in the chemotherapy-alone group (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.97; two-sided P=0.04). Owing to missing primary end-point data, sensitivity analyses were performed, and the results were consistent with the main findings. Missing data did not differ according to treatment group or according to the stratification factors of age and planned chemotherapy regimen. Among the 218 patients who could be evaluated, pregnancy occurred in more women in the goserelin group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (21% vs. 11%, P=0.03); women in the goserelin group also had improved disease-free survival (P=0.04) and overall survival (P=0.05)., Conclusions: Although missing data weaken interpretation of the findings, administration of goserelin with chemotherapy appeared to protect against ovarian failure, reducing the risk of early menopause and improving prospects for fertility. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; POEMS/S0230 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00068601.).

Objective: This study utilized a combination of HPV self-sampling, iFTA elute specimen cards, and long distance transport for centralized processing of specimens to determine the feasibility of large-scale screening in remote and transient populations., Methods: This study was performed in two locations in Peru (Manchay and Iquitos). The "Just For Me" cervico-vaginal brush and iFTA elute cards were used for the collection and transport of specimens. Samples were shipped via FedEx to China and tested for 14 types of high-risk HPV using PCR based MALDI-TOF. HPV positive women were treated with cryotherapy after VIA triage, and followed-up with colposcopy, biopsy, ECC, and repeat HPV testing at 6 months., Results: Six hundred and forty three women registered, and 632 returned a sample over a 10 day period. Within 2 weeks, specimens were shipped, samples tested, and results received by study staff. Sixty-eight women (10.8%) tested positive, and these results were delivered over 4 days. Fifty-nine HPV positive women (87%) returned for evaluation and treatment, and 2 had large lesions not suitable for cryotherapy. At 6 months, 42 women (74%) returned for follow-up, and 3 had CIN 2 (all positive samples from the endocervical canal). Ninety eight percent of participants reported that they would participate in this type of program again., Conclusions: Utilizing HPV self-sampling, solid media specimen cards for long distance transport, and centralized high throughput processing, we achieved rapid delivery of results, high satisfaction levels, and low loss to follow-up for cervical cancer screening in remote and transient populations., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: We report the 8-year follow-up of 34 patients aged ≥69 years old with NHL included in a phase IIb open-label randomized parallel groups study to evaluate the effectiveness of amifostine in preventing the toxicity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP regime) ., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized to receive classical CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) [maximum 2 mg] on day 1 and prednisone 100 mg/day for 5 days) or CHOP plus amifostine (6 cycles of amifostine 910 mg/m(2) on day 1). Efficacy (time to progression, TTP; disease-free survival, DFS; overall survival, OS) and toxicity endpoints were evaluated., Results: Thirty-four patients were randomized to A-CHOP (n=18) or CHOP (n=16). Patients with A-CHOP vs CHOP had significantly lower toxicity; neutropenia grade 4 ocurred in 13/92 (13%) vs 23/85 (27%, P=0.007) cycles, febrile neutropenia in 3/92 A-CHOP (3%) vs 8/85 (10%, P=.056) CHOP cycles, hospitalization for toxicity in 4/92 (4%) A-CHOP vs 11/85 (13%, P=.05) CHOP cycles. Median hospitalization stay for toxicity was 5 days with A-CHOP vs 8 days with CHOP (P=.05). There were no significant differences at 8 years in TTP (A-CHOP, 48.9% vs CHOP, 36.3%; P=.65), DFS (A-CHOP, 72.9% vs CHOP 55.6%; P=.50) and OS (A-CHOP, 44.3% vs CHOP, 54.4%). There was no long-term toxicity of clinical interest. The only prognostic factor identified to 8 years was the International Prognostic Index (IPI low/low intermediate risk vs high intermediate/high risk; HR=2.98; CI 95%:1.01-8.77; P=.048)., Conclusion: These results show that amifostine can be added to the standard CHOP treatment schedule with less acute toxicity and without influencing the outcome.

Background: Topoisomerase II-α is a molecular target of anthracyclines; several studies have suggested that topoisomerase II-α expression is related to response to anthracycline treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate if topoisomerase II-α overexpression predicts response to anthracycline treatment in locally advanced breast cancer patients., Material and Methods: Topoisomerase II-α, HER2, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors from 111 patients presenting with locally advanced breast cancer between 1995 and 2002. The prognostic value of these markers was analyzed using a multivariate proportional hazards regression model and an interaction analysis between topoisomerase II-α status and dose intensity., Results: Tumors from 40 patients (36%) showed topoisomerase II-α overexpression, 62 patients (56%) for ER, 39 (35%) for PR and 26 (23%) for HER2. There were no significant correlations between topoisomerase II-α expression and response to therapy, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Anthracycline dose intensity had a significant impact on PFS and OS in patients overexpressing topoisomerase II-α (P=0.010 and 0.027, respectively). Negative PR (P=0.041), positive HER2 (P=0.013) were identified as risk factors in the multivariate model. The multivariate analysis in patients topoisomerase II-α negative shown no significance (HR=0.92, IC 95% 0.39-2.15, P=0.839) while the multivariate analysis in topoisomerase II-α positive, dose intensity shown to be statistically significant (HR=2.725, IC 95% 1.07-6.95, P=0.036)., Conclusions: Our data do not support a correlation between topoisomerase II-α expression in breast cancer patients and improved clinical benefit with anthracycline therapy. However, they do suggest that tumors overexpressing topoisomerase II-α may experience better clinical benefit with higher anthracycline dose intensity., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Knowledge about the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in invasive cervical cancer is crucial to guide the introduction of prophylactic vaccines. We aimed to provide novel and comprehensive data about the worldwide genotype distribution in patients with invasive cervical cancer., Methods: Paraffin-embedded samples of histologically confirmed cases of invasive cervical cancer were collected from 38 countries in Europe, North America, central South America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. Inclusion criteria were a pathological confirmation of a primary invasive cervical cancer of epithelial origin in the tissue sample selected for analysis of HPV DNA, and information about the year of diagnosis. HPV detection was done by use of PCR with SPF-10 broad-spectrum primers followed by DNA enzyme immunoassay and genotyping with a reverse hybridisation line probe assay. Sequence analysis was done to characterise HPV-positive samples with unknown HPV types. Data analyses included algorithms of multiple infections to estimate type-specific relative contributions., Findings: 22,661 paraffin-embedded samples were obtained from 14,249 women. 10,575 cases of invasive cervical cancer were included in the study, and 8977 (85%) of these were positive for HPV DNA. The most common HPV types were 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 with a combined worldwide relative contribution of 8196 of 8977 (91%, 95% CI 90-92). HPV types 16 and 18 were detected in 6357 of 8977 of cases (71%, 70-72) of invasive cervical cancer. HPV types 16, 18, and 45 were detected in 443 of 470 cases (94%, 92-96) of cervical adenocarcinomas. Unknown HPV types that were identified with sequence analysis were 26, 30, 61, 67, 69, 82, and 91 in 103 (1%) of 8977 cases of invasive cervical cancer. Women with invasive cervical cancers related to HPV types 16, 18, or 45 presented at a younger mean age than did those with other HPV types (50·0 years [49·6-50·4], 48·2 years [47·3-49·2], 46·8 years [46·6-48·1], and 55·5 years [54·9-56·1], respectively)., Interpretation: To our knowledge, this study is the largest assessment of HPV genotypes to date. HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 should be given priority when the cross-protective effects of current vaccines are assessed, and for formulation of recommendations for the use of second-generation polyvalent HPV vaccines. Our results also suggest that type-specific high-risk HPV-DNA-based screening tests and protocols should focus on HPV types 16, 18, and 45., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Molecular classification is an excellent prognostic and predictive method in breast cancer (BC). In this study. we evaluated differences in clinicopathologic features and overall survival (OS) in four BC molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, basal cell-like, and HER2/neu., Patients and Methods: Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 was performed using a Peruvian hospital database of 1198 BC patients who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2002. Overall survival was calculated., Results: Out of 1198 patients with invasive BC, 49.3% were luminal A; 13.2%, luminal B; 21.3%, basal-like; and 16.2%, HER2. The mean of age at diagnosis was 51.5 years for luminal A; 49.6 for luminal B; 49.5 for basal-like; and 49.4 for HER2. The HER2 subtype showed 63.7% positive lymph nodes, 42.3% stage III and 9.7% stage IV cases. Basal subtypes showed the highest prevalence of a poorly differentiated phenotype (70.3%). Average follow-up was 60 months. Five-year OS was significantly different between all 4 groups (P < .0001); luminal A had the highest OS, followed by luminal B, basal-like; and HER2. Results are compared with other population studies., Conclusion: This study shows significant differences between the distribution of molecular subtypes and clinicopathologic features. Immunohistochemistry is useful in the clinical management of BC patients.

Background: This study was conducted to determine the prognostic effect hormone receptor (HR) status in early HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients, since it has not yet been established whether HR status can be used in the prognosis of patients with (HER2+) breast cancer., Patients and Methods: We obtained data from 299 patients with early HER2+ breast cancer who underwent surgery and received standard adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and/or radiation between 2000 and 2002 at the Instituto Nacional De Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Perú. Clinical and pathological features were compared. Endpoints analyzed were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Overall, 155 patients were HR-positive (HR+) and 144 were negative (HR-). The two groups had similar characteristics except for histologic grade and extracapsular extension. With a median follow-up of 93 months, 5-year DFS was statistically different between the two groups: 65.0% for (HER2+/ HR-) and 74.6% for the (HER2+/ HR+) patients (p=.045). OS at 5 years was not statistically different between the two groups with 75.5% for (HER2+/ HR-) patients and 82.4% for the (HER2+/ HR+)(p=.140)., Conclusions: Patients with (HER2+/ HR-) breast cancers treated with surgery and standard adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a statistically worse DFS compared to those with (HER2+/ HR+) tumors. However, OS was similar in both groups.

Purpose: This phase II trial of pemetrexed explored potential correlations between treatment outcome (antitumor activity) and molecular target expression., Experimental Design: Chemonaïve patients with advanced breast cancer received up to three cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (10-minute i.v. infusion) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. Tumors were surgically removed after the last cycle of pemetrexed as clinically indicated. Biopsies were taken at baseline, 24 hours after infusion in cycle 1, and after cycle 3., Results: Sixty-one women (median age, 46 years; range, 32-72 years) were treated and were evaluable for response. Objective response rate was 31%. Simple logistic regression suggested a potential relationship between mRNA expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and pemetrexed response (P = 0.103). Based on threshold analysis, patients with "low" baseline TS (< or = 71) were more likely to respond to pemetrexed than patients with "high" baseline TS (>71). Expression of baseline dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase tended to be higher in responders but this association was not significant (P > 0.311). TS expression increased significantly between baseline and biopsy 2 (P = 0.004) and dropped to near baseline levels at biopsy 3. Conversely, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase decreased after pemetrexed chemotherapy., Conclusions: Our results suggest a potential association between "low" pretreatment TS expression levels and response to pemetrexed chemotherapy. Future trials examining expression levels of other genes important to the folate pathway and/or breast cancer may identify a more robust multigene profile that can better predict response to this novel antifolate.