Search

The study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing pharmacogenetically guided dosing of antidepressants with empiric standard of care. Publications referring to genotype-guided antidepressant therapy were identified via PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases from the inception of the databases to 2021. In addition, bibliographies of all articles were manually searched for additional references not identified in primary searches. Studies comparing clinical outcomes between two groups of patients who received antidepressant treatment were included in meta-analysis. Analysis of the data revealed statistically significant differences between the experimental group receiving pharmacogenetically guided dosing and the empirically treated controls. Specifically, genotype-guided treatment significantly improved response and remission of patients after both eight and twelve weeks of therapy, whereas no effect on the development of adverse drug reactions was observed. This meta-analysis indicates that the use of preemptive genotyping to guide dosing of antidepressants might increase treatment efficacy.

Background: Concurrent disorder or dual diagnosis refers to a combination of substance use disorders and mental disorders that occur in the same patient simultaneously. These conditions pose significant clinical and healthcare impacts and are often underdiagnosed, undertreated, and complex to manage. Objective: We assessed the quality of current pharmacological recommendations for the management of dual diagnosis, particularly by evaluating the use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA). Method: A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Scopus databases for publications up to September 21, 2021, without any time restrictions. The following search strings were used: (aripiprazole OR brexpiprazole OR cariprazine OR paliperidone OR risperidone OR quetiapine OR clozapine OR olanzapine) AND (psychosis OR schizophrenia OR schizoaffective) AND (“substance use disorder” OR cocaine OR alcohol OR cannabis OR heroin OR “double diagnosis” OR “dual diagnosis”)) NOT (animal OR rat OR mouse) NOT (review or meta-analysis). Results: The search produced a final set of 41 articles. Most patients were males and were affected by schizophrenia, with cannabis the most abused substance, followed by alcohol. Aripiprazole was the most used drug, either orally or by long-acting formulations, followed by risperidone with oral and long-acting formulations, clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine. Conclusion: The findings highlight the use of SGA for the treatment of psychotic symptoms in comorbidity with substance use. Future studies on people with dual diagnosis and focused on long-term evaluations are warranted and need to investigate the efficacy of newly introduced molecules, such as partial D2 agonists and long-acting injectable antipsychotics.

Background: Previous studies have shown that haloperidol biotransformation is mainly metabolized by CYP2D6. The CYP2D6 gene is highly polymorphic, contributing to inter-individual differences in enzymatic activity, and may impact haloperidol biotransformation rates, resulting in variable drug efficacy and safety profiles. Objective: The study aimed to investigate the correlation of the CYPD6 activity with haloperidol's efficacy and safety rates in patients with alcohol-induced psychotic disorders. objective: To investigate the correlation of the CYPD6 activity with the efficacy and safety rates of haloperidol in patients with alcohol-induced psychotic disorders. Method: One hundred male patients received 5-10 mg/day haloperidol by injections for 5 days. The efficacy and safety assessments were performed using PANSS, UKU, and SAS-validated psychometric scales. Results: No relationship between haloperidol efficacy or safety and the experimental endogenous pharmacometabolomic marker for CYP2D6 activity, urinary 6-НО-ТНВС/pinoline ratio was identified. In contrast, we found a statistically significant association between haloperidol adverse events and the most common CYP2D6 loss-of-function allele CYP2D6*4 (p Conclusion: Evaluation of the single polymorphism rs3892097 that defines CYP2D6*4 can predict the safety profile of haloperidol in patients with AIPD, whereas metabolic evaluation using an endogenous marker was not a suitable predictor. Furthermore, our results suggest haloperidol dose reductions could be considered in AIPD patients with at least one inactive CYP2D6 allele.

Introduction: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have a common and increasing use for the treatment of patients diagnosed with depressive disorders. Some of them do not respond adequately to therapy, and numerous previous studies have indicated an increased risk of type A adverse drug reactions. Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of 1846G>A polymorphism of CYP2D6 on the concentration/dose ratio of paroxetine. Material and methods: The study enrolled 267 patients with depressive episode (average age, 40.3 ± 14.3 years). Therapy included paroxetine in an average daily dose of 25.1 ± 9.5 mg per day. The efficacy and safety rates of treatment were evaluated using the international psychometric scales. For genotyping, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Results: Our study revealed the statistically significant results in terms of treatment efficacy (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores): ( GG) 2.0 [1.0; 3.0] and ( GA) 4.0 [2.0; 5.0], p Conclusion The effect of CYP2D6*4 genetic polymorphism on the efficacy profile of paroxetine was demonstrated in a group of 267 patients with depressive disorder.

Background Accurate, comprehensive, cause-specific mortality estimates are crucial for informing public health decision making worldwide. Incorrectly or vaguely assigned deaths, defined as garbage-coded deaths, mask the true cause distribution. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study has developed methods to create comparable, timely, cause-specific mortality estimates; an impactful data processing method is the reallocation of garbage-coded deaths to a plausible underlying cause of death. We identify the pattern of garbage-coded deaths in the world and present the methods used to determine their redistribution to generate more plausible cause of death assignments. Methods We describe the methods developed for the GBD 2019 study and subsequent iterations to redistribute garbage-coded deaths in vital registration data to plausible underlying causes. These methods include analysis of multiple cause data, negative correlation, impairment, and proportional redistribution. We classify garbage codes into classes according to the level of specificity of the reported cause of death (CoD) and capture trends in the global pattern of proportion of garbage-coded deaths, disaggregated by these classes, and the relationship between this proportion and the Socio-Demographic Index. We examine the relative importance of the top four garbage codes by age and sex and demonstrate the impact of redistribution on the annual GBD CoD rankings. Results The proportion of least-specific (class 1 and 2) garbage-coded deaths ranged from 3.7% of all vital registration deaths to 67.3% in 2015, and the age-standardized proportion had an overall negative association with the Socio-Demographic Index. When broken down by age and sex, the category for unspecified lower respiratory infections was responsible for nearly 30% of garbage-coded deaths in those under 1 year of age for both sexes, representing the largest proportion of garbage codes for that age group. We show how the cause distribution by number of deaths changes before and after redistribution for four countries: Brazil, the United States, Japan, and France, highlighting the necessity of accounting for garbage-coded deaths in the GBD. Conclusions We provide a detailed description of redistribution methods developed for CoD data in the GBD; these methods represent an overall improvement in empiricism compared to past reliance on a priori knowledge.

INTRODUCTION: Mirtazapine is commonly prescribed to patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder.Some proportion of these patients do not show adequate response to treatment regimen containing mirtazapine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Results of the previous studies showed that CYP2D6 is involved in the biotransformation of mirtazapine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the influence of 1846G>A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 (as evaluated by the 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and on CYP2D6 expression level obtained by measuring the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma levelsin patients suffering from recurrent depressive disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study included 192 patients with major depressive disorder (age – 41.4 ± 15.6 years). Treatment regimen included mirtazapine in an average daily dose of 37.4 ± 13.5 mg per week. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP2D6 was assessed with HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6M-THBC/pinoline). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Our study revealed the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMD scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 10.0 [9.0; 11.0] and (GA) 12.0 [11.0; 12.0], p < 0.001; at the same time, the statistical significance in the safety profile was obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 4.0] and (GA) 4.0 [3.0; 5.0], p < 0.001. We didn’t reveal a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 0.229 [0.158; 0.468] and (GA) 0.290 [0.174; 0.526], p = 0.196. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn’t demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma levels in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 23.6 [17.6; 28.0], (GA) 21.8 [17.2; 27.0], p = 0.663. At the same time, correlation analysis didn’t reveal a statistically significant relationship between the mirtazapine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = 0.05, p = 0.460. Also, we didn’t reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.11, p = 0.124. In addition, we revealed the relationship between the CYP2D6 enzymatic activity (as evaluated by 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = –0.32, p < 0.001. At the same time, correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the mirtazapine concentration and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = 0.31, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of mirtazapine was demonstrated in a group of 192 patients with recurrent depressive disorder. At the same time, hsa-miR-370-3p remains a promising biomarker for assessing the level of CYP2D6 expression, because it correlates with encoded isoenzyme activity.

INTRODUCTION: Duloxetine is commonly prescribed to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some part of patients in this group do not respond adequately to treatment regimen containing duloxetine, while many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research investigated that CYP2D6 is involved in the biotransformation of duloxetine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of 1846G > A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of duloxetine, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 (as evaluated by the 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and on CYP2D6 expression level obtained by measuring the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from recurrent depressive disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study enrolled 118 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age – 40.6±17.1 years). Therapy included duloxetine in an average daily dose of 103.7±37.1 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR Real-time). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Our findings revealed the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMD scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 9.0 [7.0; 10.0] and (GA) 11.0 [8.5; 14.0], p < 0.001; at the same time, the statistical significance in the safety profile was obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [3.0; 4.0] and (GA) 4.0 [3.0; 4.0], p = 0.007. We revealed a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of duloxetine in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 0.776 [0.529; 1.067] and (GA) 1.388 [0.942; 1.732], p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of duloxetine was demonstrated in a group of 118 patients with recurrent depressive disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Fluvoxamine is commonly administered to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of these patients do not show adequate response to the therapy with fluvoxamine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research revealed that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of fluvoxamine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, and 5-HTR2A genes on the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine and on the CYP3A expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from a recurrent depressive disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study included 105 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 37.5 ± 13.2 years). The treatment regimen included fluvoxamine in an average daily dose of 117.6 ± 44.3 mg per week. Therapy efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6b-HC/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Our study didn’t reveal any statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy and safety of the therapy. We also didn’t reveal a statistical significance for the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine in patients with different genotypes. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn’t demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes. At the same time, correlation analysis didn’t reveal a statistically significant relationship between the fluvoxamine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: r(s) = –0.012, p = 0.63. Also, we didn’t reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = –0.175, p = 0.30. In addition, we didn’t reveal the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity and the miR-27b plasma concentration: r(s) = –0.197, p < 0.32. However, the difference in the CYP3A enzymatic activity in carriers of AG and GG genotypes of the 6986A > G polymorphism of CYP3A5 gene has been revealed: (AG) 4.72 [1.18; 8.45] vs (GG) 9.23 [5.12; 15.53], p-value = 0.23. CONCLUSION: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, 5-HTR2A gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of fluvoxamine was not demonstrated in a group of 105 patients with depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder.