Search

The utility of nanobodies and conventional antibodies for in vivo imaging is well known, but optimum dosing and timing schedules for one versus the other have not been established. We aimed to improve specific tumor imaging in vivo with nanobodies and conventional antibodies using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging. We used ARTC2 expressed on lymphoma cells as a model target antigen. ARTC2-specific nanobody s+16a and conventional antibody Nika102 were labeled with NIRF-dye AF680. In vivo NIRF-imaging of ARTC2-positive and ARTC2-negative xenografts was performed over 24 h post-injection of 5, 10, 25, or 50 µg of each conjugate. Specific target-binding and tissue-penetration were verified by NIRF imaging ex vivo, flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. NIRF-imaging of s+16a(680) in vivo revealed a six times faster tumor accumulation than of Nika102(680). Using 50 µg of s+16a(680) increased the specific signals of ARTC2-positive tumors without increasing background signals, allowing a tumor-to-background (T/B) ratio of 12.4 ± 4.2 within 6 h post-injection. Fifty micrograms of Nika102(680) increased specific signals of ARTC2-positive tumors but also of ARTC2-negative tumors and background, thereby limiting the T/B ratio to 6.1 ± 2.0. Ten micrograms of Nika102(680) only slightly reduced specific tumor signals but dramatically reduced background signals. Ex vivo analyses confirmed a faster and deeper tumor penetration with s+16a(680). Using nanobody s+16a allowed same-day imaging with a high T/B ratio, whereas antibody Nika102 gave optimal imaging results only 24 h post injection. Nanobody s+16a required a high dose, whereas antibody Nika102 had the best T/B-ratio at a low dose. Therefore, timing and dosage should be addressed when comparing nanobodies and conventional antibodies for molecular imaging purposes.

The cell surface ecto-enzyme CD38 is a promising target antigen for the treatment of hematological malignancies, as illustrated by the recent approval of daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Our aim was to evaluate the potential of CD38-specific nanobodies as novel diagnostics for hematological malignancies. We successfully identified 22 CD38-specific nanobody families using phage display technology from immunized llamas. Crossblockade analyses and in-tandem epitope binning revealed that the nanobodies recognize three different non-overlapping epitopes, with four nanobody families binding complementary to daratumumab. Three nanobody families inhibit the enzymatic activity of CD38 in vitro, while two others were found to act as enhancers. In vivo, fluorochrome-conjugated CD38 nanobodies efficiently reach CD38 expressing tumors in a rodent model within 2 hours after intravenous injection, thereby allowing for convenient same day in vivo tumor imaging. These nanobodies represent highly specific tools for modulating the enzymatic activity of CD38 and for diagnostic monitoring CD38-expressing tumors.

The cell surface ecto-enzyme CD38 is a promising target antigen for the treatment of hematological malignancies, as illustrated by the recent approval of daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Our aim was to evaluate the potential of CD38-specific nanobodies as novel diagnostics for hematological malignancies. We successfully identified 22 CD38-specific nanobody families using phage display technology from immunized llamas. Crossblockade analyses and in-tandem epitope binning revealed that the nanobodies recognize three different non-overlapping epitopes, with four nanobody families binding complementary to daratumumab. Three nanobody families inhibit the enzymatic activity of CD38 in vitro, while two others were found to act as enhancers. In vivo, fluorochrome-conjugated CD38 nanobodies efficiently reach CD38 expressing tumors in a rodent model within 2 hours after intravenous injection, thereby allowing for convenient same day in vivo tumor imaging. These nanobodies represent highly specific tools for modulating the enzymatic activity of CD38 and for diagnostic monitoring CD38-expressing tumors. Fil: Fumey, William. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Koenigsdorf, Julia. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Kunick, Valentin. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Menzel, Stephan. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Schütze, Kerstin. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Unger, Mandy. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Schriewer, Levin. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Haag, Friedrich. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Adam, Gerhard. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Oberle, Anna. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Binder, Mascha. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Fliegert, Ralf. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Guse, Andreas. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Zhao, Yong Juan. Peking University; China Fil: Lee, Hon Cheung. Peking University; China Fil: Malavasi, Fabio. Università di Torino; Italia Fil: Goldbaum, Fernando Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Instituto Leloir; Argentina Fil: Van Hegelsom, Rob. Ablynx nv; Bélgica Fil: Stortelers, Catelijne. Ablynx nv; Bélgica Fil: Bannas, Peter. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania Fil: Koch Nolte, Friedrich. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Alemania

This protocol outlines the steps required to perform ex vivo validation of in vivo near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) xenograft imaging experiments in mice using fluorophore labelled nanobodies and conventional antibodies. First we describe how to generate subcutaneous tumors in mice, using antigen-negative cell lines as negative controls and antigen-positive cells as positive controls in the same mice for intraindividual comparison. We outline how to administer intravenously near-infrared fluorophore labelled (AlexaFluor680) antigen-specific nanobodies and conventional antibodies. In vivo imaging was performed with a small-animal NIRF-Imaging system. After the in vivo imaging experiments the mice were sacrificed. We then describe how to prepare the tumors for parallel ex vivo analyses by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy to validate in vivo imaging results. The use of the near-infrared fluorophore labelled nanobodies allows for non-invasive same day imaging in vivo. Our protocols describe the ex vivo quantification of the specific labeling efficiency of tumor cells by flow cytometry and analysis of the distribution of the antibody constructs within the tumors by fluorescence microscopy. Using near-infrared fluorophore labelled probes allows for non-invasive, economical in vivo imaging with the unique ability to exploit the same probe without further secondary labelling for ex vivo validation experiments using flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy.

The utility of nanobodies and conventional antibodies for in vivo imaging is well known, but optimum dosing and timing schedules for one versus the other have not been established. We aimed to improve specific tumor imaging in vivo with nanobodies and conventional antibodies using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging. We used ARTC2 expressed on lymphoma cells as a model target antigen. ARTC2-specific nanobody s+16a and conventional antibody Nika102 were labeled with NIRF-dye AF680. In vivo NIRF-imaging of ARTC2-positive and ARTC2-negative xenografts was performed over 24 h post-injection of 5, 10, 25, or 50 µg of each conjugate. Specific target-binding and tissue-penetration were verified by NIRF imaging ex vivo, flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. NIRF-imaging of s+16a(680) in vivo revealed a six times faster tumor accumulation than of Nika102(680). Using 50 µg of s+16a(680) increased the specific signals of ARTC2-positive tumors without increasing background signals, allowing a tumor-to-background (T/B) ratio of 12.4 ± 4.2 within 6 h post-injection. Fifty micrograms of Nika102(680) increased specific signals of ARTC2-positive tumors but also of ARTC2-negative tumors and background, thereby limiting the T/B ratio to 6.1 ± 2.0. Ten micrograms of Nika102(680) only slightly reduced specific tumor signals but dramatically reduced background signals. Ex vivo analyses confirmed a faster and deeper tumor penetration with s+16a(680). Using nanobody s+16a allowed same-day imaging with a high T/B ratio, whereas antibody Nika102 gave optimal imaging results only 24 h post injection. Nanobody s+16a required a high dose, whereas antibody Nika102 had the best T/B-ratio at a low dose. Therefore, timing and dosage should be addressed when comparing nanobodies and conventional antibodies for molecular imaging purposes.