Fungal Divers. ISI Document Delivery No.: 940HT Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 69 Cited References: Atan S, 2003, J RUBBER RES, V6, P58 Barthe P, 2007, J MOL BIOL, V367, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.086 Bendtsen JD, 2004, J MOL BIOL, V340, P783, DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 Breton F., 2000, Journal of Rubber Research, V3, P115 Cai L, 2006, ANTON LEEUW INT J G, V89, P293, DOI 10.1007/s10482-005-9030-1 Chang S. J., 1993, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, V11, P113, DOI 10.1007/BF02670468 Chaparro DF, 2009, REV IBEROAM MICOL, V26, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.riam.2009.03.005 Chee K. H., 1990, Review of Plant Pathology, V69, P423 CHEE K H, 1988, Journal of Natural Rubber Research, V3, P21 Collado J, 1999, NEW PHYTOL, V144, P525, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00533.x de Lamotte F, 2007, J CHROMATOGR B, V849, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.051 Deon M, 2012, PLANT SCI, V185, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.10.017 Dixon LJ, 2009, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V99, P1015, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO-99-9-1015 Drummond A., 2011, GENEIOUS V5 4 Farr D. F., 2011, FUNGAL DATABASES SYS FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.2307/2408678 FISHER PJ, 1992, NEW PHYTOL, V120, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01066.x Gazis R, 2010, FUNGAL ECOL, V3, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.funeco.2009.12.001 GOLDMAN N, 1994, MOL BIOL EVOL, V11, P725 Gond SK, 2007, WORLD J MICROB BIOT, V23, P1371, DOI 10.1007/s11274-007-9375-x Hyde KD, 2001, FUNGAL DIVERS, V7, P35 Jayasinghe CK, 1998, B RUBBER RES I SRI L, V39, P1 Jayasinghe CK, 1996, P WORKSH COR LEAF FU, P3 Jayasinghe C.K., 1986, J RUBBER RES I SRI L, V65, P47 Junqueira N. T. V., 1985, Proceedings of the regional conference on plant quarantine support for agricultural development. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10-12 December 1985., P253 Kingsland GC, 1985, ACTA HORTIC ISHS, V153, P229 Kodsueb R, 2008, FUNGAL DIVERS, V30, P37 Koenning SR, 2006, PLANT DIS, V90, P974, DOI 10.1094/PD-90-0974C Krogh A, 2001, J MOL BIOL, V305, P567, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 Kumar DSS, 2004, FUNGAL DIVERS, V17, P69 Lana TG, 2011, GENET MOL RES, V10, P326, DOI 10.4238/vol10-1gmr895 Lee S, 2004, FUNGAL DIVERS, V17, P91 Liyanage NIS, 1986, J RUBBER RES I SRI L, V65, P51 Martin R, 1968, ADANSONIA, V8, P475 Mostert L, 2000, SYDOWIA, V52, P46 Nei M., 2000, MOL EVOLUTION PHYLOG Newsam A, 1960, PLANT PATHOLOGY DIVI NUGAWELA A, 1989, Journal of Natural Rubber Research, V4, P233 Okane I, 2008, MYCOSCIENCE, V49, P359, DOI 10.1007/s10267-008-0440-6 Oliveira R. R., 2007, Summa Phytopathologica, V33, P297, DOI 10.1590/S0100-54052007000300016 Oliveira R. R., 2006, Fitopatologia Brasileira, V31, P509, DOI 10.1590/S0100-41582006000500012 ONESIROSAN P, 1975, PHYSIOL PLANT PATHOL, V5, P289, DOI 10.1016/0048-4059(75)90095-8 Pawirosoemardjo S., 1996, P WORKSH COR LEAF FA, P79 Pfaffl MW, 2001, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V29, DOI 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 Photita W, 2004, FUNGAL DIVERS, V16, P131 Photita W, 2005, FUNGAL DIVERS, V18, P117 Pongthep K, 1987, P IRRDB S CHIANG MAI, P1 Porras-Alfaro A, 2011, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V49, P291, DOI 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081831 Promputtha I, 2010, FUNGAL DIVERS, V41, P89, DOI 10.1007/s13225-010-0024-6 Promputtha I, 2002, FUNGAL DIVERS, V10, P89 Promputtha I, 2007, MICROB ECOL, V53, P579, DOI 10.1007/s00248-006-9117-x Purwantara A, 1987, MENARA PERKEBUNAN, V55, P47 Qi YX, 2009, MOL BIOTECHNOL, V41, P145, DOI 10.1007/s12033-008-9109-9 R Development Core Team, 2009, R LANG ENV STAT COMP Risterucci AM, 2000, THEOR APPL GENET, V101, P948, DOI 10.1007/s001220051566 Rocha ACS, 2011, FUNGAL DIVERS, V47, P75, DOI 10.1007/s13225-010-0044-2 Rojas EI, 2010, MYCOLOGIA, V102, P1318, DOI 10.3852/09-244 Romruensukharom P., 2005, Journal of Rubber Research, V8, P38 SAITOU N, 1987, MOL BIOL EVOL, V4, P406 Sallaud C, 2003, THEOR APPL GENET, V106, P1396, DOI 10.1007/s00122-002-1184-x Schlub RL, 2009, ACTA HORTIC, V808, P25 Schoch CL, 2009, STUD MYCOL, P1, DOI 10.3114/sim.2009.64.01 Shamsul KAS, 1996, P WORKSH COR LEAF FA, P21 Sinulingga W, 1996, P WORKSH COR LEAF FA, P7 Suryanarayanan TS, 2011, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V20, P913, DOI 10.1007/s10531-011-0004-5 Suryanarayanan TS, 2002, CAN J BOT, V80, P818, DOI [10.1139/B02-069, 10.1139/b02-069] Tamura K, 2007, MOL BIOL EVOL, V24, P1596, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msm092 Wahounou PJ, 1996, P WORKSH COR LEAF FA, P99 White TJ, 1990, AMPLIFICATION DIRECT Deon, Marine Scomparin, Ana Tixier, Aude Mattos, Carlos R. R. Leroy, Thierry Seguin, Marc Roeckel-Drevet, Patricia Pujade-Renaud, Valerie IFC (Institut Francais du Caoutchouc, Paris, France); Michelin (Clermont-Ferrand, France); SIPH ("Societe Internationale de Plantations d'Hevas", Courbevoie, France); SOCFIN ("Societe Financiere des Caoutchoucs", Bruxelles, Belgium) This work was supported in part by a grant from the IFC (Institut Francais du Caoutchouc, Paris, France) and the companies Michelin (Clermont-Ferrand, France), SIPH ("Societe Internationale de Plantations d'Hevas", Courbevoie, France) and SOCFIN ("Societe Financiere des Caoutchoucs", Bruxelles, Belgium). We thank Boris Fumanal and Jean-Stephane Venisse for their valuable comments. Springer New york Si; Corynespora cassiicola is the causal agent of Corynespora Leaf Fall (CLF) disease. CLF is one of the most important fungal diseases of rubber trees in Asia and Africa but disease outbreaks have not been reported in South America. Cassiicolin, a small cysteine-rich glycoprotein secreted by the pathogenic isolate CCP, was previously identified as a potential disease effector in rubber tree. Recently, the cassiicolin-encoding gene () was characterized and shown to be expressed in the early phase of infection. In this study, we investigated whether previously undetected strains of are present in South American rubber plantations by examining the fungal endophyte population found in asymptomatic rubber tree leaves. Four isolates were identified as . Genes encoding new forms of the cassiicolin precursor protein (Cas3 and Cas4) were identified from these isolates. Three of four isolates were able to induce symptoms on the cultivar they were isolated from in a detached leaf assay, with different kinetics and intensities. One isolate had the same pathogenicity profile as the pathogenic isolate CCP; the other two isolates developed symptoms late during the course of infection, suggesting saprotrophic capabilities. However, no or transcripts could be detected upon inoculation with the endophytic isolates, whereas the reference gene was expressed upon inoculation with the CCP isolate. This work demonstrated that is present in South America in an endophytic form and that it may evolve from an endophytic to a saprophytic or even potentially pathogenic life style.