Search

Background Pregnant laboring patients sometimes require interfacility transfer to a higher level of care. There is a paucity of evidence to inform when it is safe to transfer a laboring patient and when delivery may be too imminent to transfer. Methods This is a retrospective study of pregnant patients undergoing interfacility transfer with a specialized obstetric transport team deployed from a large Midwest regional healthcare system. The primary outcome was delivery prior to or within one hour of arrival at the receiving institution due to progression of labor. Data collected included basic demographics, vital signs, gravidity, parity, gestational age, contraction frequency if contractions were present, and cervical dilation. We sought to define the association between these variables and the primary outcome to inform risk assessment for precipitous delivery among patients being considered for interfacility transfer. Results Of the 370 pregnant patients for whom the specialized transfer team was requested, 11 (3%) met the primary outcome. Those with more advanced cervical dilation and those who did not receive regular prenatal care were more likely to meet the criteria for the primary outcome. For every centimeter of cervical dilation, the odds of meeting the primary outcome increased 2.3-fold (95% CI: 1.5-3.4). Conclusions We identified risk factors for early delivery among pregnant patients for whom an interfacility transfer was requested and described patients who were high-risk for obstetric interfacility transport due to the progression of labor. Our results can help inform risk assessments for transferring potentially high-risk laboring patients., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Indiana University Institutional Review Board issued approval 20146. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Lardaro et al.)

Objective: This study describes the local Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response and patient encounters corresponding to the civil unrest occurring over a four-day period in Spring 2020 in Indianapolis, Indiana (USA)., Methods: This study describes the non-conventional EMS response to civil unrest. The study included patients encountered by EMS in the area of the civil unrest occurring in Indianapolis, Indiana from May 29 through June 1, 2020. The area of civil unrest defined by Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department covered 15 blocks by 12 blocks (roughly 4.0 square miles) and included central Indianapolis. The study analyzed records and collected demographics, scene times, interventions, dispositions, EMS clinician narratives, transport destinations, and hospital course with outcomes from receiving hospitals for patients extracted from the area of civil unrest by EMS., Results: Twenty-nine patients were included with ages ranging from two to sixty-eight years. In total, EMS transported 72.4% (21 of 29) of the patients, with the remainder declining transport. Ballistic injuries from gun violence accounted for 10.3% (3 of 29) of injuries. Two additional fatalities from penetrating trauma occurred among patients without EMS contact within and during the civil unrest. Conditions not involving trauma occurred in 37.9% (11 of 29). Among transported patients, 33.3% (7 of 21) were admitted to the hospital and there was one fatality., Conclusions: While most EMS transports did not result in hospitalization, it is important to note that the majority of EMS calls did result in a transport. There was a substantial amount of non-traumatic patient encounters. Trauma in many of the encounters was relatively severe, and the findings imply the need for rapid extraction methods from dangerous areas to facilitate timely in-hospital stabilization.

Objective: Disparities have been observed in the treatment of pain in emergency department patients. However, few studies have evaluated such disparities in emergency medical services (EMS). We describe pain medication administration for trauma indications in an urban EMS system and how it varies with patient demographics., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of adult patients transported for isolated trauma (without accompanying medical complaint) from 1/1/18 to 6/30/2020 by a third service EMS agency in a major United States metropolitan area. We performed descriptive statistics on epidemiology, type of pain medications administered, and pain scores. Kruskall-Wallis and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. We constructed a logistic regression model to estimate the odds of nontreatment of pain by age, race, sex, transport interval, pain score, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score for patients with pain scores of at least four on a one to ten scale, the threshold for pain treatment per the EMS protocol., Results: Of 32,463 EMS patients with traumatic injuries included in the analysis, 40% (12,881/32,463) were African American, 50% (16,284/32,463) were female, the median age was 27 years (IQR 45-64), and the median initial pain score was 5 (IQR 2-8). Fifteen percent (4,989/32,463) received any analgesic. Initial pain scores were significantly higher for African American and female patients. African American patients were less likely to receive analgesia compared to White and Hispanic patients (19% versus 25% and 23%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age, pain score, transport interval, and GCS, African American compared to White, and female compared to male patients were less likely to be treated for pain, OR 1.59 (95% CI 1.47-1.72) and OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.11-1.28), respectively., Conclusion: Among patients with isolated traumatic injuries treated in a single, urban EMS system, African American and female patients were less likely to receive analgesia than White or male patients. Analgesics were given to a small percentage of patients who were eligible for treatment by protocol, and intravenous opioids were used in the vast majority patients who received treatment.

Objective: To describe interfacility transfer (IFT) intervals, transfer vehicle type, and levels of care in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes transferred for emergent endovascular therapy (EVT)., Methods: We included all patients transferred by a single IFT agency in the state of Indiana from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2020 to a comprehensive stroke center in Indianapolis for emergent EVT. Data were collected from the transfer center electronic medical records and matched to IFT and receiving hospital data., Results: Two hundred eighty-eight patients were included, of which 150 (52.0%) received EVT. The median call-to-needle interval (from call to the transfer center to EVT needle puncture) was 155.5 minutes (IQR 135.8-195.3). The median resource activation interval (call to the transfer center to IFT deployment) was 16 minutes (IQR 10-27 minutes); the median IFT response interval (call to IFT to arrival of the transferring unit) was 34 minutes (IQR 25-43 minutes); the median pre-transfer interval (call to the transfer center until departure from the sending hospital) was 60.4 minutes (IQR 47.1-72.6); and the median sending hospital interval at bedside was 25 minutes (IQR 20-30 minutes). Most patients (197, 68.4%) were sent via critical care rotor. Only 61 (21.2%) required interventions other than tissue plasminogen administration, such as titration of actively transfusing medications (e.g., nicardipine, propofol) (37 of 61, 59.7%), or intubation or ventilator management (25 of 61, 40.3%). Patients sent via critical care rotor had longer sending hospital intervals (26 minutes, IQR 22-32, vs 19 minutes, IQR 16-25; p < 0.001) but shorter transfer intervals than those sent via critical care ground., Conclusions: At longer distances, rotor transport saved significant time specifically in the total IFT interval of patients with LVO strokes. Emphasizing processes to reduce the resource activation interval and the sending hospital interval may help reduce the overall time-to-EVT.

Background: Obesity is a growing epidemic associated with higher rates of metabolic disease, heart disease and all-cause mortality. Heavier patients may require more advanced resources and specialized equipment. We hypothesize that increasing patient weight will be associated with longer prehospital on-scene times., Methods: We reviewed electronic patient care records for patients transported by two urban 9-1-1 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies. We collected age, sex, estimated patient weight, vital signs (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry), provider impression, method of moving patient to ambulance, and on-scene times. We selected patients with time-sensitive diagnoses of stroke, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and trauma and compared on-scene times for patients who weighed above or below 300 pounds. We performed descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for discrete variables. We constructed a generalized linear model to determine the effect of patient weight adjusted for covariates., Results: For a three-year period (May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2021) 48,203 patients were transported with an EMS impression of stroke, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and trauma. 23,654 (49.1%) patients were female, and the median age was 52 (IQR 34-68) years. The median weight was 175.0 (IQR 150.0-205.0) pounds. Patients above a dichotomous weight categorization of 300 pounds experienced a longer median scene time with any time-sensitive diagnosis (12.6 versus 11.9 min p < 0.001), STEMI (16.0 versus 13.1 min, p = 0.014) and blunt trauma (12.6 versus 11.9 min, p < 0.001)). They were more likely to be hypoxic (p < 0.001) and more likely to experience cardiac arrest (p < 0.001). They were less likely to walk to the ambulance (22.1% versus 32.2%, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Patient weight above 300 pounds was associated with significantly longer on-scene time. These patients were more likely to be hypoxic, sustain a cardiac arrest, and less likely to walk to the ambulance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this paper, we describe the elucidation of the target of an aptamer against ovarian cancer previously obtained by cell-SELEX (SELEX = systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment). The target's identity, stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 (STIP1), was determined by mass spectrometry and validated by flow cytometry, using siRNA silencing and protein blotting. Initial oncologic studies show that the aptamer inhibits cell invasion, indicating that STIP1, which is currently under investigation as a potential biomarker for ovarian cancer, plays a critical role in this process. These results serve as an excellent example of how protein target identification of aptamers obtained by cell-SELEX can serve as a means to identify promising biomarker candidates and can promote the development of aptamers as a new drug class to block important oncological processes.