Search

STUDY QUESTION What are the implications of the presence cytoplasmic strings (Cyt-S) and their quantity and dynamics for the pre-implantation development of human blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER Cyt-S are common in human embryos and are associated with faster blastocyst development, larger expansion, and better morphological quality. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Cyt-S are dynamic cellular projections connecting inner cell mass and trophectoderm (TE) cells, that can be observed during blastocyst expansion. Their prevalence in human embryos has been estimated to be between 44% and 93%. Data relevant to their clinical implications and role in development are lacking, limited, or controversial. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective study conducted at a single IVF center between May 2013 and November 2014 and involving 124 pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles in a time-lapse incubator with ≥1 blastocyst biopsied and vitrified (N = 370 embryos assessed). These cycles resulted in 87 vitrified-warmed single-euploid blastocyst transfers. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS ICSI, continuous blastocyst culture (Days 5–7), TE biopsy of fully expanded blastocysts without Day 3 zona pellucida drilling, qPCR to assess uniform full-chromosome aneuploidies, and vitrification were all performed. Only vitrified-warmed euploid single-embryo-transfers were conducted. Blastocyst morphological quality was defined according to Gardner's criteria. The AI-based software CHLOE™ (Fairtility) automatically registered timings from time of starting blastulation (tSB) to biopsy (t-biopsy, i.e. blastocyst full-expansion) as hours-post-insemination (hpi), embryo area (including zona pellucida in µm2), and spontaneous blastocyst collapses. One senior embryologist manually annotated Cyt-S presence, quantity, timings, and type (thick cell-to-cell connections and/or threads). All significant associations were confirmed through regression analyses. All couples', cycles', and embryos' main features were also tested for associations with Cyt-S presence, quantity, and dynamics. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE About 94.3% of the patients (N = 117/124) had ≥1 embryo with Cyt-S. Out of a total of 370 blastocysts, 55 degenerated between blastulation and full-expansion (N = 55/370, 14.9%). The degeneration rate among embryos with ≥1 Cyt-S was 10.8% (N = 33/304), significantly lower than that of embryos without Cyt-S (33.3%, N = 22/66, P  < 0.01). Of the remaining 315 viable blastocysts analyzed, 86% (N = 271/315; P  < 0.01) had ≥1 Cyt-S, on average 3.5 ± 2.1 per embryo ranging 1–13. The first Cyt-S per viable embryo appeared at 115.3 ± 12.5 hpi (85.7–157.7), corresponding to 10.5 ± 5.8 h (0.5–31) after tSB. Overall, we analyzed 937 Cyt-S showing a mean duration of 3.8 ± 2.7 h (0.3–20.9). Cyt-S were mostly threads (N = 508/937, 54.2%) or thick cell-to-cell connections becoming threads (N = 382/937, 40.8%) than thick bridges (N = 47/937, 5.0%). The presence and quantity of Cyt-S were significantly associated with developmentally faster (on average 6–12 h faster) and more expanded (on average 2700 µm2-larger blastocyst's area at t-biopsy) embryos. Also, the presence and duration of Cyt-S were associated with better morphology. Lastly, while euploidy rates were comparable between blastocysts with and without Cyt-S, all euploid blastocysts transferred from the latter group failed to implant (N = 10). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Cyt-S presence and dynamics were assessed manually on seven focal planes from video frames recorded every 15 min. The patients included were mostly of advanced maternal age. Only associations could be reported, but no causations/consequences. Lastly, larger datasets are required to better assess Cyt-S associations with clinical outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Cyt-S are common during human blastocyst expansion, suggesting their physiological implication in this process. Their presence, quantity and dynamics mirror embryo viability, and morphological quality, yet their role is still unknown. Future basic science studies are encouraged to finally describe Cyt-S molecular nature and biophysical properties, and Artificial Intelligence tools should aid these studies by incorporating Cyt-S assessment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION What are the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in women who underwent up to two more euploid blastocyst transfers after three failures in the absence of another known factor that affects implantation? SUMMARY ANSWER The fourth and fifth euploid blastocyst transfers resulted in similar live birth rates of 40% and 53.3%, respectively, culminating in a cumulative live birth rate of 98.1% (95% CI = 96.5–99.6%) after five euploid blastocyst transfers. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The first three euploid blastocysts have similar implantation and live birth rates and provide a cumulative live birth rate of 92.6%. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION An international multi-center retrospective study was conducted at 25 individual clinics. The study period spanned between January 2012 and December 2022. A total of 123 987 patients with a total of 64 572 euploid blastocyst transfers were screened for inclusion. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients with a history of any embryo transfer at another clinic, history of any unscreened embryo transfer at participating clinics, parental karyotype abnormalities, the use of donor oocytes or a gestational carrier, untreated intracavitary uterine pathology (e.g. polyp, leiomyoma), congenital uterine anomalies, adenomyosis, communicating hydrosalpinx, endometrial thickness <6 mm prior to initiating of progesterone, use of testicular sperm due to non-obstructive azoospermia in the male partner, transfer of an embryo with a reported intermediate chromosome copy number (i.e. mosaic), preimplantation genetic testing cycles for monogenic disorders, or structural chromosome rearrangements were excluded. Ovarian stimulation protocols and embryology laboratory procedures including trophectoderm biopsy followed the usual practice of each center. The ploidy status of blastocysts was determined with comprehensive chromosome screening. Endometrial preparation protocols followed the usual practice of participating centers and included programmed cycles, natural or modified natural cycles. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 105 (0.085% of the total population) patients met the criteria and underwent at least one additional euploid blastocyst transfer after failing to achieve a positive pregnancy test with three consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers. Outcomes of the fourth and fifth euploid blastocyst transfers were similar across participating centers. Overall, the live birth rate was similar with the fourth and fifth euploid blastocysts (40% vs 53.3%, relative risk = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.93–1.9, P value = 0.14). Sensitivity analyses excluding blastocysts biopsied on Day 7 postfertilization, women with a BMI >30 kg/m2, cycles using non-ejaculate or donor sperm, double-embryo transfer cycles, and cycles in which the day of embryo transfer was modified due to endometrial receptivity assay test result yielded similar results. Where data were available, the fourth euploid blastocyst had similar live birth rate with the first one (relative risk = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.58–1.21, P  = 0.29). The cumulative live birth rate after five euploid blastocyst transfers was 98.1% (95% CI = 96.5–99.6%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Retrospective design has its own inherent limitations. Patients continuing with a further euploid embryo transfer and patients dropping out from treatment after three failed euploid transfers can be systematically different, perhaps with regard to ovarian reserve or economic status. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS Implantation failure seems to be mainly due to embryonic factors. Given the stable and high live birth rates up to five euploid blastocysts, unexplained recurrent implantation failure should have a prevalence of <2%. Proceeding with another embryo transfer can be the best next step once a known etiology for implantation failure is ruled out. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(s) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses a randomized controlled trial that compares a conventional stimulation protocol with an unconventional approach involving double oocyte retrieval and continuous FSH administration in IVF. The study found that the unconventional protocol did not increase the number of mature oocytes compared to the conventional protocol. However, the authors caution against generalizing these findings to all double stimulation protocols, as the study had a small sample size and did not include a washout period between stimulations. The authors also raise concerns about the rationale for continuous FSH administration and the choice of transfer strategies. Overall, the study provides guidance on which protocols and patient populations to avoid for a multicycle approach conducted via double stimulation in the same ovarian cycle. [Extracted from the article]