Search

Copyright of Rehabilitation & Physical Medicine / Rehabilitace a Fyzikální Lékařství is the property of Czech Medical Association of JE Purkyne and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of General Practitioner / Praktický Lékař is the property of Czech Medical Association of JE Purkyne and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy and regional nodal irradiation after radical mastectomy is defined in high-risk patients with locally advanced tumors, positive margins, and unfavorable biology. The benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in intermediate-risk patients (T3N0 tumors) remains a matter of controversy. It has been demonstrated that radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery lowers the locoregional recurrence rate compared with surgery alone and improves the overall survival rate. In patients with four or more positive lymph nodes or extracapsular extension, regional lymph node irradiation is indicated regardless of the surgery type (breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy). Despite the consensus that patients with more than three positive lymph nodes should be treated with radiotherapy, there is controversy regarding the recommendations for patients with one to three involved lymph nodes. In patients with N0 disease with negative findings on axillary surgery, there is a trend to administer regional lymph node irradiation in patients with a high risk of recurrence. In patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and mastectomy, adjuvant radiotherapy should be administered in cases of clinical stage III and/or ≥ypN1. In patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast-conserving surgery, postoperative radiotherapy is indicated irrespective of pathological response.

Modern radiotherapy techniques are designed to permit reduced irradiation of healthy tissue, resulting in a diminished risk of adverse effects and shortened recovery times. Several randomized studies have demonstrated the benefits of increased dosage to the tumor bed area in combination with whole breast irradiation (WBI). Conventional WBI treatment following breast-conserving procedures, which required 5-7 weeks of daily treatments, has been reduced to 3-4 weeks when using hyperfractionated regimens. The dosage administration improves local control, albeit with poorer cosmesis. The method of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) shortens the treatment period whilst reducing the irradiated volume. APBI can be delivered using intraoperative radiation, brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy. Currently available data support the use of external beam partial breast irradiation in selected patients. Modern radiotherapy techniques make it possible to achieve favorable cosmesis in most patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction surgery, and studies confirm that current methods of external beam radiation allow an acceptable coverage of target volumes both in the reconstructed breast and in the regional lymphatic nodes.

Introduction: The exact location of the original tumor should be known for a targeted increase in the dose to the tumor bed after breast cancer surgery. Therefore, at our site, we perform CT examinations of patients in the radiation position before breast cancer surgery., Methods: Preoperative native CT scans were performed in the patients in the planning position for radiotherapy; these data were fused with standard planning CT for boost irradiation. We evaluated whether the tumor was accurately identifiable in preoperative CT scans. We also contoured one irradiation volume in the standard planning CT scans and the other in the fusion CT scans with preoperative examination, and compared these volumes., Results: Out of the total number of 554 patients, we were able to identify the exact location of the breast tumor in 463 cases (83.6 %). In a group of 50 randomly selected patients, the clinical target volume for the boost dose to the postlumpectomy cavity was changed in 20 patients (40%) - decreased in 9 cases (18%) and increased in 11 cases (22%)., Conclusion: As shown by the results of our study, preoperative CT in the planning position can be used in patients with confirmed breast cancer. This method allows us to more accurately locate the tumor bed and thus more accurately draw the target volume for boost irradiation. We confirmed that preoperative CT had an impact on the size of the target volume.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose to organs at risk for deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) radiotherapy in patients with lef-sided breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy after partial mastectomy.  Methods: One hundred patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent DIBH and FB planning computed tomography scans, and the 2 techniques were compared. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed for heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and left lung.  Results: Radiation dose to heart, LAD, and left lung was significantly lower for DIBH than for free breathing plans. The median mean heart dose for DIBH technique in comparison with FB was 1.21 Gy, and 3.22 Gy respectively; for LAD, 4.67 versus 24.71 Gy; and for left lung 8.32 Gy versus 9.99 Gy.  Conclusion: DIBH is an effective technique to reduce cardiac and lung radiation exposure.

Background: The combination of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plays a significant role in sparing normal tissue during prostate cancer treatment. We report the clinical outcomes of 260 patients treated with high-dose IGRT as well as the toxicity of high-dose IGRT in these patients., Materials and Methods: From September 2008 to February 2012, 260 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical radiotherapy. Two hundred patients were treated with IMRT (78 Gy in 39 fractions) to the prostate and base of seminal vesicles using an adaptive protocol combining cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and kilovoltage image matching with individualized safety margin calculation. Sixty patients underwent treatment with the same prescribed dose using RapidArc with a reduced safety margin of 6 mm and daily online matching using CBCT. Late toxicity was scored prospectively according to the RTOG/FC-LENT scale., Results: Eighteen patients (6.9%) experienced acute grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. There was no acute grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. Thirty-nine patients (15%) experienced acute grade 2 genitourinary toxicity and 6 patients (2.3%) had grade 3 gerourinary toxicity. Genitourinary toxicity grade 4 was observed in 5 (1.9%) patients, due to installation of a urinary catheter. At a median follow up of 84.2 months, the estimated 7-year cumulative incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were 4.4 and 7.1% respectively. The estimated 7-year prostate specific antigen relapse free survival was 97.1% for low-risk disease, 83.6% for intermediate-risk disease and 75% for high-risk patients., Conclusion: The use of IMRT in combination with IGRT results in a low rate of late toxicity. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 8. 9. 2019 Accepted: 25. 10. 2019.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) with increased expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 with tyrosine kinase activity (HER2+) is a clinically and bio-logically heterogeneous dis-ease. In terms of gene expression, there are four major molecular subtypes - Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and Basal-like. The most common subtype is HER2-E (50- 60%). In hormone-dependent (HR+) HER2-positive tumors, the subgroup HER2-E represents 40- 50% of cases; others are luminal A and B subtypes., Purpose: The aim of this review is to provide information on the significance of the distribution of HER2-positive tumors accord-ing to subtype, which is considered a predictive parameter for guid-ing treatment decisions. For example, HER2-E subtype is characterized by a higher probability of achiev-ing complete pathological remission when treated with chemother-apy and antiHER2 ther-apy, and it is thought that it could be treated us-ing a dual HER2 blockade without chemother-apy. Currently, triple-positive tumors, a specific subtype of breast cancer characterized by HER2+ and HR+, are more often subjects of interest. Their unique bio-logical properties are due to complex interactions between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) signalling, which result in lower effectiveness of endocrine ther-apy in these patients than in HR+ and HER2-negative patients and, at the same time, the ER positivity in HER2+ tumors can result in resistance to antiHER2 ther-apy. This type of BC is a non-homogeneous group where the impacts of HER2 positivity on tumor malignant behavior and activity of the estrogen-driven signal-ing pathway are inconsistent. Current studies focus on test-ing new treatments such as dual HER2 block-ing or immunother-apy, in combination with antiHER2 targeted ther-apy with fulvestrant, aromatase inhibitors, cyclin dependent kinase 4/ 6 inhibitors, or inhibitors of the PI3K (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase) pathway., Conclusion: The distribution of HER2+ BC accord-ing to individual subtype provides information that can contribute to achiev-ing more accurate decisions about the most appropriate ther-apy. Key words breast cancer - subtype - HER2 - trastuzumab - HER2 positive - triple positive - HER2 enriched The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 27. 9. 2018 Accepted: 26. 11. 2018.

Background: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of prostate cancer thanks to its capacity for healthy tissue sparing. This work reports on the acute and late toxicity rates among 233 patients treated with high-dose IMRT., Material and Methods: From June 2003 to December 2007, 233 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical radiotherapy. One hundred sixty patients were treated with IMRT to the prostate and the base of seminal vesicles to 78 Gy in 39 fractions, 73 patients underwent simultaneous integrated boost. Prescribed doses were 82 Gy and 73,8 Gy in 41 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles, respectively. Late toxicity was evaluated prospectively using a RTOG/FC-LENT score., Results: Thirty patients (12.8%) experienced acute Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. No acute Grade 3 or 4 GI toxicity developed. Forty two patients (18.1%) experienced acute Grade 2 genitourinary toxicity and 23 patients (9.9%) had Grade 3 GU toxicity. Grade 4 Genitourinary toxicity was observed in nine (3.8%) patients, due to a need of short-term urinary catheterization. With a median follow-up of 49.2 months, the estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity was 22.4%. The estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of Grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was 17.7%., Conclusion: Intensity modulated radiotherapy enables dose escalation to 78-82 Gy with an acceptable toxicity.

Background: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is the method of choice in external-beam radiotherapy tolocalized prostate cancer. This work analyses five year results of IMRT with a dose of 78/82 Gy., Patients and Methods: From June 2003 to December 2007, the IMRT technique was employed to treat 233 patients with T1-3 N0 M0 prostate cancer. It was supplemented by hormone therapy especially in high-risk patients. Two IMRT techniques were applied - IMRT with a dose of 78 Gy in 39 fractions to prostate and seminal vesicles (SV) (IMRT 78) and IMRT with simultaneous integrated 82 Gy boost to prostate concurrently with 73,8 Gy in 41 fractions to SV (IMRT SIB 82). The IMRT 78 technique was used in 160 patients (69%). Seventy-three (31%) patients with intermediate (IR) or high-risk (HR) prostate cancer without SV involvement were treated with IMRT SIB 82 technique. The PSA relapse was defined as an increase in PSA of at least 2.0 ng/mL above the nadir or in comparison to the value at the initiation of hormone therapy. Clinical relapse was defined as an occurence of distant metastases and/or local recurrence., Results: The median follow-up of our patients´ population was 4.3 years (range 0.6-8.9 years). The estimated 5-year PSA relapse-free survival in low-risk (LR), IR and HR patients was 86%, 89% and 83%, respectively (p = NS). In a multivariate analysis, Gleason score (GS) 8-10 was associated with significantly higher risk of PSA relapse (RR 2.76), while higher age at the time of diagnosis significantly decreased the PSA relapse risk (RR 0.94). The estimated 5-year clinical relapse-free survival in LR, IR and HR patients was 100%, 99% and 95%, respectively (p = NS). In a univariate analysis, both GS and PSA had a significant impact on the 5-year clinical relapse-free survival - GS 2-7 97 % vs GS 8-10 88 % (p = 0.03), PSA 20 98 % vs PSA > 20 85 % (p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Treatment of localized prostate cancer using IMRT with a dose 78/82 Gy yielded an excellent 5-year tumour control with a risk of clinical relapse being less than 5%.

Objective: To demonstrate the clinical benefit of MRI-based brachytherapy using CT and MRI data fusion., Design: Clinical trial., Setting: Oncology Centre, Multiscan and Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice., Methods: Thirty six patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were treated with MRI-based brachytherapy (MRI-based preplanning 15 patients, MRI approximation 21 patients). All patients were continuously followed during and after treatment. Tumor control and toxicity were evaluated at each visit. Late gastrointestinal and genitourinary symptoms were recorded, using Fox Chase (FC) modification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT) toxicity criteria., Results: We observed no complications during the entire MRI procedure at the radiology department. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity at median follow up of 30.3 months was 4.8% and 9.5% for MRI approximation, respectively 0% and 13.3% for MRI-based preplanning. Local control was 86.7% for MRI-based preplanning and 76.2% for MRI approximation., Conclusion: 3D MRI-based brachytherapy with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion yields excellent local control with minor toxicity.