Search

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), which enclose Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, relapsing inflammatory ailments. Their specific pathogenesis is not completely clarified, the worldwide incidence and prevalence of IBD has been steadily growing, and there is still not a definitive cure. The management of IBD has become more and more targeted, with specific immune mediators identified to be involved in its pathogenesis. Vedolizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody binding specifically to the α4β7 integrin, is a gut-selective immunosuppressive biologic drug administered for both CD and UC. With the same indications as vedolizumab, ustekinumab is a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody binding with specificity to the shared p40 protein subunit of human cytokines interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23. Several selective IL-23p19 monoclonal antibodies (risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab) have also revealed admirable efficacy and safety in IBD patients. Nutrition is a very important environmental factor associated with the onset and progression of IBD, and the Western diet is considered to contribute to the development of IBD. In this narrative review, our aim is to present an overview of the main results from recent clinical studies on IBD regarding diet, new drug treatments, and also vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses a case of IgA vasculitis in a patient with ulcerative colitis who was undergoing treatment with vedolizumab. IgA vasculitis is a rare symptom associated with ulcerative colitis, and vedolizumab is an antibody used to treat inflammatory bowel diseases. The patient experienced pulmonary hemorrhage and purpura on her limbs, which were preceded by episodes of hemoptysis. The article suggests that the development of IgA vasculitis may have been triggered by a combination of factors, including the alteration of intestinal microbiota due to vedolizumab treatment and lower respiratory tract infection. The patient's symptoms improved with prednisolone treatment, and there was no recurrence of symptoms after discontinuing prednisolone. The article concludes by stating that further research is needed to determine if vedolizumab increases the risk of IgA vasculitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States. Methods: Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015–06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients. Results: A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined. Conclusions: Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Today, there are many treatment options available for the management of ulcerative colitis, creating challenges in selecting the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment sequences. Treatments in the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapeutic class, as well as vedolizumab, are widely used and endorsed as first-line options according to treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to compare treatment sequences involving vedolizumab and the anti-TNFα treatment adalimumab in terms of cost-effectiveness in the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in Italy. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model comparing treatment sequences within the Italian National Health Service in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with a lifetime horizon was developed. The analysis focused on the relative positioning of vedolizumab and adalimumab, leveraging the results of the landmark head-to-head VARSITY clinical trial as key inputs. The robustness of the results was investigated through a range of sensitivity and scenario analyses. Results: The strategy of vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy followed by adalimumab was associated with higher costs and health benefits compared with first-line adalimumab followed by vedolizumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €16,146/QALY, which was found to be robust to changes to inputs associated with areas of high uncertainty. Conclusion: This economic evaluation estimated a 94% probability that vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy is cost-effective at a threshold of €33,004/QALY when compared with first-line adalimumab sequences. Using clinical trial evidence to inform the efficacy of second-line treatments estimated that the effectiveness of anti-TNFα treatments is not substantially reduced by vedolizumab exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), esketamine nasal spray (NS) significantly increased the probability of remission at Week 8, and of being relapse-free through Week 32 after remission at Week 8, versus quetiapine extended release (XR) in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Here, we explore the time course, burden and consequences of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the phase IIIb ESCAPE‑TRD trial. Patients with TRD were randomised 1:1 to esketamine NS or quetiapine XR, dosed per label alongside an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In this secondary publication, safety analyses (comprising patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment) included incidence, severity and durations (Kaplan‑Meier method) of TEAEs, and subsequent dispositional changes. P values were not adjusted for multiple testing. 336 patients were randomised to esketamine NS and 340 to quetiapine XR; 334 and 336 received ≥1 dose of study treatment, respectively. TEAEs were significantly more common with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (91.9 % versus 78.0 %; p < 0.001), but were typically mild/moderate and transient in nature: a greater proportion resolved on the same-day (92.0 % versus 12.1 %) and lead to treatment discontinuation in significantly fewer patients (4.2 % versus 11.0 %, respectively; p < 0.001). The proportion of days spent with TEAEs was significantly lower with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (median: 11.9 % versus 21.3 %; p < 0.001). Although more frequent with esketamine NS, TEAEs were typically transient and mild, with discontinuation less likely versus quetiapine XR. Data were consistent with established safety profiles, with no new safety signals identified. Alongside greater efficacy, the demonstrably more favourable tolerability profile of esketamine NS versus quetiapine XR further supports its use for TRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Expeditious initiation of biologic therapy is important in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, initiation of biologics in the outpatient setting may be delayed by various clinical, social, and financial variables. Aim: To evaluate the delay in initiation of an advanced therapy in IBD and to identify factors that contributed to this delay. Methods: This was a multi-center retrospective study. Outpatients who were initiated on a biologic therapy from 3/1/2019 to 9/30/20 were eligible for the study. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with a delay in biologic treatment initiation. Delay was defined as the days from decision date (prescription placement) to first infusion or delivery of medication. Results: In total 411 patients (Crohn's disease, n = 276; ulcerative colitis, n = 129) were included in the analysis. The median [interquartile range-(IQR)] delay for all drugs was 20 [12–37] days (infliximab, 19 [13–33] days; adalimumab, 10 [5–26] days; vedolizumab, 21 [14–42] days; and ustekinumab, 21 [14–42] days). Multivariate linear regression analysis identified that the most important variables associated with delays in biologic treatment initiation was self-identification as Black, longer distance from treatment site, and lack of initial insurance coverage approval. Conclusion: There may be a significant delay in biologic treatment initiation in patients with IBD. The most important variables associated with this delay included self-identification as Black, longer distance from site, and lack of initial insurance coverage approval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vedolizumab is a treatment option for ulcerative colitis but data on predictors of treatment response remain insufficient to establish personalized treatment strategies. We aimed to investigate the real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab in adult patients with ulcerative colitis and explore factors involved in predicting treatment response. This single-center, single-arm, prospective observational study included 26 patients with clinically active ulcerative colitis patients' characteristics at baseline, epidemiological information, existing treatment, clinical activity index score, endoscopic score, and blood test data were collected. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factors alpha, interferon gamma, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, soluble mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1, and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 were measured. Patient characteristics in the remission and non-remission groups were compared based on these parameters. Clinical remission at 6 weeks of treatment occurred in 9 (35%) of the 26 patients. At 14 weeks, clinical remission was observed in 11 patients (42%). There were no significant differences pertaining to age, sex, duration of disease, extent of disease, steroid resistance, or prior treatment with biological agents among the two groups after 14 weeks of treatment. Hemoglobin = 11.5 g/dL (odds ratio, 15.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-149; P=0.014) and soluble mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 = 765 pg/mL (odds ratio, 17.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.36-127; P=0.004) were significant factors. In conclusion, hemoglobin and serum soluble mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 levels are factors correlated with the therapeutic efficacy of vedolizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents versus non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population. Objectives: We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents. Design: This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data. Methods: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (n = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed. Results: In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46–1.44, p = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07–1.26, p = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed. Conclusion: In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long-term vedolizumab (VDZ) outcomes in real-world cohorts have been largely limited to 1-year follow-up, with few bio-naïve patients or objective markers of inflammation assessed. Objectives: We aimed to assess factors affecting VDZ persistence including clinical, biochemical and faecal biomarker remission at 1, 3 and 5 years. Design: We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Methods: All adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who had received VDZ induction for ulcerative colitis (UC)/IBD-unclassified (IBDU) were included. Baseline phenotype and follow-up data were collected via a review of electronic medical records. Results: We included 290 patients [UC n = 271 (93.4%), IBDU n = 19 (6.6%)] with a median time on VDZ of 27.6 months (interquartile range: 14.4–43.2). At the end of follow-up, a total of 157/290 (54.1%) patients remained on VDZ. The median time to discontinuation was 14.1 months (7.0–23.3). Previous exposure to ⩾1 advanced therapy, steroid use at baseline and disease extension (E3 and E2 versus E1) were independent predictors for worse VDZ persistence. Clinical remission (partial Mayo < 2) was 75.7% (171/226), 72.4% (157/217) and 70.2% (127/181) at years 1, 3 and 5, respectively. Steroid use during maintenance VDZ therapy occurred in 31.7% (92/290), hospitalization in 15.5% (45/290) and surgery in 3.4% (10/291). The rate of serious adverse events was 1.2 per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Conclusion: VDZ effectiveness appears enduring with favourable long-term safety profile. VDZ persistence was influenced by previous exposure to biologics/small molecules, disease distribution and steroid use at baseline in our study. Plain language summary: Vedolizumab long-term use in ulcerative colitis What was this study done? • Vedolizumab efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis have been firmly established by existing evidence. • Long-term data from the GEMINI trial further corroborate the favourable safety profile over an extended duration but there is little data on long-term vedolizumab use over 1 year. What did the researches do? • We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study. All adult IBD patients who ever received vedolizumab induction from November 2014 to December 2021 for ulcerative colitis/IBDU were included. What did the researchers find? • This real-world study demonstrates that vedolizumab persistence exceeds 80% at 1 year and remains nearly 50% at 5 years with no new safety signals. • Worse vedolizumab persistence is associated with prior exposure to biologics/small molecules, more extensive disease involvement and steroid use at vedolizumab initiation. What do the findings mean? • These findings have important implications for drug positioning and sequencing, as well as for optimizing outcomes when vedolizumab is utilized as first-line therapy. Furthermore, it also emphasizes the long-term safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Steroid-resistant (SR) lower gastrointestinal (LGI) tract graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality from GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The role of vedolizumab in the treatment of SR-LGI acute GVHD (aGVHD) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab combined with basiliximab as second-line therapy for SRLGI-aGVHD. Methods: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of vedolizumab combined with basiliximab for SR-LGI-aGVHD. The primary endpoint was the overall response (OR) on day 28. Secondary and safety endpoints included durable OR at day 56, overall survival (OS), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM), failure-free survival (FFS), and adverse events. Results: Twenty-eight patients with SR-LGI-aGVHD were included. The median time to start of combination therapy after SR-LGI-aGVHD diagnosis was 7 (range, 4-16) days. The overall response rate (ORR) at 28 days was 75.0% (95% CI: 54.8%-88.6%), and 18 achieved a complete response (CR) (64.3%, 95% CI: 44.1%-80.7%). The durable OR at day 56 was 64.3% (95% CI: 44.1%-80.7%). The 100-day, 6-month, and 12-month OS rates for the entire cohort of patients were 60.7% (95% CI: 45.1%-81.8%), 60.7% (95% CI: 45.1%-81.8%), and 47.6% (95% CI: 31.4%-72.1%), respectively. The median failure-free survival was 276 days; (95% CI: 50-not evaluable) 12-month NRM was 42.9% (95% CI: 24.1%-60.3%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 35.7%. Within 180 days after study treatments, the most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were infections. Nine (32.1%) patients developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation complicated with bacterial infections (25.0%, CMV infection; 7.1%, CMV viremia). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation occurred in five patients (17.9%, 95% CI: 6.8%-37.6%). Only three patients (10.7%, 95% CI: 2.8%-29.4%) in our study developed pseudomembranous colitis. Conclusions: Vedolizumab plus basiliximab demonstrated efficacy in severe SRLGI-aGVHD and was well-tolerated. Vedolizumab plus basiliximab may be considered a potential treatment option for patients with LGI-aGVHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background/Aims: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective agent with a favorable safety profile. We aimed to assess the feasibility of elective switch from other advanced therapies to VDZ and subsequent live-attenuated vaccination while continuing VDZ in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Methods: We measured antibody titers specific for measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella viruses in IBD patients under immunosuppressive therapy. Those with negative titers and without vaccination history were judged unimmunized. Patients were administered vaccines while continuing VDZ or switched to VDZ if receiving other advanced therapies and then administered vaccines. Co-primary outcomes were the rate of maintaining disease severity after vaccination and the rate without vaccine-induced infection. Results: Among 107 unimmunized patients, 37 agreed to receive live-attenuated vaccines while continuing VDZ (17 patients) or after switching to VDZ (20 patients). In the 20 patients who electively switched to VDZ, disease severity was maintained except for 1 patient who developed intestinal infection. After 54 weeks, 18 patients (90%) continued to receive VDZ, excluding 2 patients who reverted to their originally administered biologics. In all 37 patients administered live-attenuated vaccines under VDZ treatment, disease severity was maintained after vaccination. Antibody titers became positive or equivocal in 34 patients (91.9%). There were no cases of vaccine-induced infection during a median observation period of 121 weeks. Conclusions: While live-attenuated vaccines are contraindicated under immunosuppressive therapy, they may be safely administered while receiving VDZ immunotherapy. Switching from other advanced therapies to VDZ and subsequently receiving live-attenuated vaccines may be a safe alternative in unimmunized patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a complication of drugs that may cause permanent kidney injury. AIN has been reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with the integrin inhibitor vedolizumab. Through systematic review of existing literature, we aimed to identify and describe cases of AIN in patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science Core Collection between 1 January 2009 and 25 April 2023. The search yielded 1473 publications. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers. Seventy publications were reviewed in full-text. Eight met the inclusion criteria. Clinical characteristics of AIN cases were extracted. Case causality assessment was performed according to two international adverse drug reaction probability assessment scales. Results were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine biopsy-confirmed cases of AIN were reported in six patients with ulcerative colitis and three with Crohn's disease. Mean age at AIN onset was 36 years (range = 19–58) and the majority of patients were females (n = 6/9). Time from vedolizumab treatment initiation to AIN onset spanned from hours to 12 months. Common symptoms were fever and malaise. Creatinine levels were elevated in all patients. Five patients sustained permanent kidney injury. Our findings suggest that vedolizumab, although rarely, could cause AIN in patients with IBD. Awareness of laboratory findings and symptoms consistent with AIN, along with monitoring of the kidney function, could be warranted in patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Growing evidence suggests that impaired gut permeability and gut microbiota alterations are involved in the pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs), which include Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Vedolizumab is an anti-α4β7 antibody approved for IBD treatment, used as the first treatment or second-line therapy when the first line results in inadequate effectiveness. The aim of this study is to develop a mathematical model capable of describing the pathophysiological mechanisms of Vedolizumab treatment in IBD patients. In particular, the relationship between drug concentration in the blood, colonic mucosal permeability and fecal microbiota composition was investigated and modeled to detect and predict trends in order to support and tailor Vedolizumab therapies. To pursue this aim, clinical data from a pilot study on a cluster of 11 IBD patients were analyzed. Enrolled patients underwent colonoscopy in three phases (before ( t 0 ), after 24 weeks of ( t 1) and after 52 weeks of ( t 2   ) Vedolizumab treatment) to collect mucosal biopsies for transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) evaluation (permeability to ions), intestinal permeability measurement and histological analysis. Moreover, fecal samples were collected for the intestinal microbiota analysis at the three time points. The collected data were compared to those of 11 healthy subjects at t 0 , who underwent colonoscopy for screening surveillance, and used to implement a three-compartmental mathematical model (comprising central blood, peripheral blood and the intestine). The latter extends previous evidence from the literature, based on the regression of experimental data, to link drug concentration in the peripheral blood compartment with Roseburia abundance and intestinal permeability. The clinical data showed that Vedolizumab treatment leads to an increase in TEER and a reduction in intestinal permeability to a paracellular probe, improving tissue inflammation status. Microbiota analysis showed increasing values of Roseburia, albeit not statistically significant. This trend was adequately reproduced by the mathematical model, which offers a useful tool to describe the pathophysiological effects of Vedolizumab therapy on colonic mucosal permeability and fecal microbiota composition. The model's satisfactory predictive capabilities and simplicity shed light on the relationship between the drug, the microbiota and permeability and allow for its straightforward extension to diverse therapeutic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims The G protein coupled receptor GPR15 is expressed on and functionally important for T cells homing to the large intestine. However, the precise mechanisms by which GPR15 controls gut homing have been unclear. Thus, we aimed to elucidate these mechanisms as well as to explore the potential of targeting GPR15 for interfering with T cell recruitment to the colon in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Methods We used dynamic adhesion and transmigration assays, as well as a humanised in vivo model of intestinal cell trafficking, to study GPR15-dependent effects on gut homing. Moreover, we analysed GPR15 and integrin expression in patients with and without IBD, cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Results GPR15 controlled T cell adhesion to MAdCAM-1 and VCAM-1 upstream of α4β7 and α4β1 integrin, respectively. Consistently, high co-expression of these integrins with GPR15 was found on T cells from patients with IBD, and GPR15 also promoted T cell recruitment to the colon in humanised mice. Anti-GPR15 antibodies effectively blocked T cell gut homing in vitro and in vivo. In vitro data, as well as observations in a cohort of patients treated with vedolizumab, suggest that this might be more effective than inhibiting α4β7. Conclusions GPR15 seems to have a broad, but organ-selective, impact on T cell trafficking and is therefore a promising target for future therapy of IBD. Further studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundUlcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease are 2 types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a group of chronic digestive disorders caused by aberrant immune responses to intestinal microbes. Although changes in the composition of immune cell subsets in the context of IBD have been previously described, the interactions and communication among cells are less well understood. Moreover, the precise mechanisms of action underlying many biologic therapies, including the anti-α4β7 integrin antagonist vedolizumab, remain incompletely understood. Our study aimed to explore possible additional mechanisms through which vedolizumab acts.MethodsWe performed cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq) on peripheral blood and colon immune cells derived from patients with ulcerative colitis treated with the anti-α4β7 integrin antagonist vedolizumab. We applied a previously published computational approach, NicheNet, to predict immune cell-cell interactions, revealing putative ligand-receptor pairs and key transcriptional changes downstream of these cell-cell communications (CCC).ResultsWe observed decreased proportions of T helper 17 (TH17) cells in UC patients who responded to vedolizumab and therefore focused the study on identifying cell-cell communications and signals of TH17 cells with other immune cells. For example, we observed that colon TH17 cells from vedolizumab nonresponders were predicted to have a greater degree of interactions with classical monocytes compared with responders, whereas colon TH17 cells from vedolizumab responders exhibited more interactions with myeloid dendritic cells compared with nonresponders.ConclusionsOverall, our results indicate that efforts to elucidate cell-cell communications among immune and nonimmune cell types may increase the mechanistic understanding of current and investigational therapies for IBD.

Background/Aims Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective agent with a favorable safety profile. We aimed to assess the feasibility of elective switch from other advanced therapies to VDZ and subsequent live-attenuated vaccination while continuing VDZ in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Methods We measured antibody titers specific for measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella viruses in IBD patients under immunosuppressive therapy. Those with negative titers and without vaccination history were judged unimmunized. Patients were administered vaccines while continuing VDZ or switched to VDZ if receiving other advanced therapies and then administered vaccines. Co-primary outcomes were the rate of maintaining disease severity after vaccination and the rate without vaccine-induced infection. Results Among 107 unimmunized patients, 37 agreed to receive live-attenuated vaccines while continuing VDZ (17 patients) or after switching to VDZ (20 patients). In the 20 patients who electively switched to VDZ, disease severity was maintained except for 1 patient who developed intestinal infection. After 54 weeks, 18 patients (90%) continued to receive VDZ, excluding 2 patients who reverted to their originally administered biologics. In all 37 patients administered live-attenuated vaccines under VDZ treatment, disease severity was maintained after vaccination. Antibody titers became positive or equivocal in 34 patients (91.9%). There were no cases of vaccine-induced infection during a median observation period of 121 weeks. Conclusions While live-attenuated vaccines are contraindicated under immunosuppressive therapy, they may be safely administered while receiving VDZ immunotherapy. Switching from other advanced therapies to VDZ and subsequently receiving live-attenuated vaccines may be a safe alternative in unimmunized patients.