espanolEn los ultimos anos, la prevalencia de la miopia en el mundo ha aumentado significativamente. El objetivo de este trabajo fue identificar la prevalencia combinada de la miopia en America segun las siguientes categorias: edad, raza, genero y region. Se realizo una revision sistematica de la literatura en las bases de datos Medline, Embase y Lilacs, con el objetivo de buscar estudios transversales con informacion sobre la prevalencia de miopia. Para encontrar la prevalencia combinada se utilizo el metodo de doble arco sinusoidal de efectos fijos o aleatorios de Freeman-Tukey. Se analizaron 15 estudios que incluyeron a 45.349 personas de Estados Unidos, Brasil y Paraguay, de 0 a 96 anos. El rango de prevalencia vario del 1,2 % al 48 % con diferencias entre hombres y mujeres del 18,4 % [IC del 95 %: 13,9-22,8] y el 19,8 % [IC del 95 %: 18,9-20,7], respectivamente. La prevalencia global en las zonas rurales fue del 1,4% [IC del 95 %: 1,3-1,5] y en las zonas urbanas del 14,3 % [IC del 95 %: 13,3-15,2]. Al mismo tiempo, se identificaron algunas diferencias basadas en la raza. En el caso de la raza blanca 15,4 % [IC 95 %: 14,4-16,3], raza negra 20,6 % [IC 95 %: 19,6-21,5] y otras razas (espanola, no espanola y afroamericana) 2,9 % [95 % CI: 1,97-3,82]. Las cifras mas bajas de prevalencia de miopia se identificaron en areas rurales en ninos en edad preescolar; Es probable que exista una relacion en el uso y el tiempo de exposicion a elementos electronicos como pantallas en contraste con el desarrollo de otras actividades en interiores. EnglishIn recent years, prevalence of myopia in the world has increased significantly. The aim of this research work is to consider the combined prevalence of myopia in America, according to the following categories: age, race, gender, and region. Such research will be done also in harmony with the reports found in scientific literature. A systematic review of the literature found in the following databases was carried out: medline, embase, and lilacs. The aim was searching cross-sectional studies containing myopia prevalence information. To find the combined prevalence, the double arc sine method of fixed or random effects by Freeman-Tukey was used. 15 research studies that included 45.349 individuals from the United States, Brazil, and Paraguay, were identified in the literature; studies of subjects aged 0-96 years old. The prevalence of myopia varied from 1,2% to 48% with differences between male and female of 18,4% [95% CI: 13,9-22,8] and 19,8% [95% CI: 18,9-20,7], respectively. The global prevalence of myopia in rural areas was 1,4% [95% CI: 1,3-1,5], and in urban areas 14,3% [95% CI: 13,3-15,2]. At the same time, some differences were identified based on race. In the case of the white race 15,4% [95% CI: 14,4-16,3], Afrodescendants 20,6% [95% CI: 19,6-21,5] and other races (Spanish, non-Spanish, and African American) 2,9% [95% CI: 1,97-3,82]. The lowest figures of myopia prevalence were identified in rural areas in pre-school children (14,1%). There is, probably, a relationship in use and exposure time to electronic items such as screens, in contrast with the development of other indoor activities as outdoor exposure as an environmental factor to slow myopia.