Search

Forests globally are experiencing severe droughts, leading to significant reductions in growth, crown dieback and even tree mortality. The ability of forest ecosystems to acclimate to prolonged and repeated droughts is critical for their survival with ongoing climate change. In a five-year throughfall exclusion experiment, we investigated the long-term physiological and morphological acclimation of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] KARST.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to repeated summer drought at the leaf, shoot and whole tree level. Throughout the drought period, spruce reduced their total water use by 70 % to only 4-9 L per day and tree, while beech was less affected with about 30 % reduction of water use. During the first two summers, spruce achieved this by closing their stomata by up to 80 %. Additionally, from the second drought summer onwards, spruce produced shorter shoots and needles, resulting in a stepwise reduction of total leaf area of over 50 % by the end of the experiment. Surprisingly, no premature leaf loss was observed. This reduction in leaf area allowed a gradual increase in stomatal conductance. After the five-year drought experiment, water consumption per leaf area was the same as in the controls, while the total water consumption of spruce was still reduced. In contrast, beech showed no significant reduction in whole-tree leaf area, but nevertheless reduced water use by up to 50 % by stomatal closure. If the restriction of transpiration by stomatal closure is sufficient to ensure survival of Norway spruce during the first drought summers, then the slow but steady reduction in leaf area will ensure successful acclimation of water use, leading to reduced physiological drought stress and long-term survival. Neighboring beech appeared to benefit from the water-saving strategy of spruce by using the excess water., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Thorsten E.E. Grams, Hans Pretzsch reports financial support was provided by German Research Foundation. Benjamin D. Hesse reports financial support was provided by German Federal Environmental Foundation. Thorsten E.E. Grams reports financial support was provided by Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer Protection. Thorsten E.E. Grams reports financial support was provided by Bavarian State Ministry of the Food, Agriculture and Forestry. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

In this study, sources of variation of postpartum cyclicity, ovulation and pregnancy rates were analyzed for 723 primiparous suckled Charolais cows treated with combined norgestomet implants (Crestar) and 600 IU PMSG (Chronogest) injected at the time of implant removal. The cows were inseminated 48 and 72 h after implant removal. Cyclicity and ovulation rate were estimated by progesterone assay and pregnancy rate by ultrasonography. At time of implant insertion, difficulty of previous calving, body condition score (BCS, from 1 to 5), interval from calving to implant insertion and herd related factors were recorded and their effects analyzed by logistic regression models. Cyclicity, ovulation and pregnancy rates were, respectively, 14.7% (106/723 ), 67.1% (381/568 ) and 42% (303/722 ) and were affected by BCS, calving conditions and interval from calving to implant insertion (P values from < 0.01 to < 0.0001). For ovulation and pregnancy rate, an interaction between BCS and interval from calving to implant insertion was found (P < 0.01). No other main factor or interaction was found to be significant. Cyclicity rate was lower in BCS1 (score < 2.5) cows (9.6%) than in BCS2 (19.8%) or BCS3 (score > 2.5) cows (22.4%), and decreased as difficulty of calving increased (23.2, 13.6 and 10.1%, respectively, for calving conditions 1, 2 and 3 cows). Cyclicity rate increased with interval from calving to implant insertion (8.2, 10.2 and 19.5%, respectively, for interval from calving to implant insertion < 60 d, between 60 and 70 d and > 70 d). Similar trends were found for ovulation rate. Previous difficult calving conditions influenced pregnancy rate negatively (47.9, 43.8 and 32.5% for calving conditions 1, 2 and 3 cows, respectively; P < 0,005).