Search

Background: Computerized neurocognitive testing is one component of a multidomain assessment of concussion. However, the use of computerized neurocognitive testing has been limited to patients aged 11 years and up, leaving clinicians with few options to evaluate younger children., Purpose: To examine the change in Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing Pediatric (ImPACT Pediatric) (ImPACT Applications, 2021) scores and factors associated with performance in children aged 5-9 years following a concussion., Methods: Participants included 63 children (42% [n = 27] female) aged 5-9 (M = 7.5 ± 1.0) years within 30 (M = 8.5 ± 5.9) days of a concussion. All participants completed the ImPACT Pediatric at their initial visit and at medical clearance for their return to activity (RTA) visit. The ImPACT Pediatric test is a computerized neurocognitive battery that includes 5 tests that assess memory and visual processing speed. Multivariate and univariate analyses of variance and paired t-tests were used to compare ImPACT Pediatric scores from the initial visit to medical clearance. Multivariate and univariate analyses of covariance and multiple linear regression examined factors associated with ImPACT Pediatric performance., Results: Participants demonstrated improved overall performance from the initial visit to the medical clearance visit ( F (4, 59)=3.08, p  = 0.02, Wilks' Λ = 0.83, η p 2 =0.17), with significant improvement in Rapid Processing Speed ( F (1, 62)=7.48, p  < 0.01, η p 2 =0.11). When controlling for age, sex, history of ADHD, and days to clinic, the improvement in overall performance remained significant ( F (4, 51)=2.99, p  = 0.03, Wilks' Λ = 0.81, η p 2 =0.19). Older age was significantly associated with the Rapid Processing composite score at the initial visit ( F (4, 59)=5.9, p  < 0.001, Adj. R 2 =0.25) and medical clearance visit ( F (4, 59)=3.8, p  = 0.008, Adj. R 2 =0.16), with older children associated with better performance at both time points (Initial visit: B = 8.17, p < 0.001; Medical Clearance: B = 3.62, p = 0.03)., Conclusion: Our main findings suggest that children aged 5-9 years improved significantly in Rapid Processing on the ImPACT Pediatric from the initial visit to medical clearance. However, no differences were found for the memory components of the ImPACT Pediatric. Older children also performed better on processing speed than younger children. The findings suggest that the processing speed components of ImPACT Pediatric are useful for monitoring improvements in neurocognitive functioning following concussion in children aged 5-9 years, but that age differences need to be considered when interpreting performance.

Concussion is a heterogeneous injury involving symptoms and impairment that represent multiple domains (e.g., anxiety, cognitive, vestibular). Network analysis, a modeling technique that estimates relationships among symptoms, provides a statistically sound and clinically practical method for evaluating these interrelationships. The purpose of this study was to examine, using network analysis, relationships among clinical assessments and multidomain symptom report within a sample of adolescent patients following a concussion. Participants included 326 patients (49.7% female) aged 10-21 years presenting to a concussion specialty clinic within 28 days of a diagnosed concussion. Participants completed the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) and Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool at initial visit. Network models were applied to PCSS symptoms initially, and then applied to VOMS and PCSS symptom data together. Dizziness (Expected influence (EI) = 1.10) and sadness (EI = 1.91) were most central (i.e., highest cumulative partial correlations) to the symptom network. Numerous interdomain relationships were supported, including irritability with mental fogginess (edgeweight = 0.12), dizziness with headache (edgeweight = 0.16), and dizziness with vision problems (edgeweight = 0.13). Community analyses resulted in VOMS groupings by domain (e.g., vestibular) and symptom (e.g., dizziness). The findings suggest a more direct focus on symptom interrelationships, such as how dizziness contributes to emotional symptoms, may help guide and better target treatments. Also, results suggest grouping VOMS assessment by symptom (e.g., dizziness) and item (e.g., vestibular-ocular reflex) may better reflect underlying impairments reflected by these symptom-item combinations.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool-5 Child (Child SCAT5) in an outpatient specialty clinic sample of children aged 5-9 years., Study Design: Ninety-six children within 30 days of a concussion (mean = 8.90 ± 5.78 days) and 43 age- and sex-matched healthy controls completed the Child SCAT5, including balance items, cognitive screening, parent and child symptom severity reports, as well as each individual parent- and child-rated symptom severity (0-3). A series of receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) analysis were performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the Child SCAT5 components to discriminate concussion., Results: The AUC values were nondiscriminate for cognitive screening (0.32) and poor for balance (0.61) items. The AUC values were acceptable for parent-reported symptoms worsening after physical activity (0.73) and mental activity (0.72). The AUCs for symptom severity items were excellent for parent (0.89) and child-reported (0.81) headaches, and were acceptable for parent-reported tired a lot (0.75) and both parent- (0.72) and child-reported (0.72) tired easily., Conclusion: With the exception of parent- and child-reported symptoms, the Child SCAT5 provides limited clinical utility for evaluating concussion in children aged 5-9 years seen at an outpatient concussion specialty clinic. The cognitive screening and balance testing items were not useful in discriminating concussion. Parent- and child-reported headache were the only Child SCAT5 items with excellent ability to differentiate concussion from controls in the age group., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Vestibular and ocular motor dysfunction occurs in an estimated 60%-90% of concussion patients. The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool is validated for use in concussion patients older than 9 years. The goal of the current study was to adapt the current VOMS tool for a pediatric sample of children aged 5-9 years and establish its clinical utility in this patient population., Methods: In this case-control study, 80 symptomatic concussion patients (n = 33 [41%] female) aged 5-9 years (mean age 7.40 ± 1.09 years) and 40 (n = 18 [45%] female) age- and sex-matched uninjured controls (mean age 7.10 ± 1.26 years) completed the VOMS-Child (VOMS-C), a version of the VOMS adapted for younger patients. Differences in binary "yes" or "no" symptom provocation for headache, dizziness, and nausea/"tummy ache" across the 7 items of the VOMS-C, and near point of convergence (NPC) distance, were examined. Logistic regression (LR) models were built to classify concussion and controls. Predicted probabilities were generated from the LR model and entered into receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve models to generate area under the curve (AUC) values., Results: VOMS-C item provocation ranged from 13% to 30% for concussed patients and 3% to 20% for controls. The LR model distinguished concussed participants from controls (R2 = 0.39; p < 0.001), with significant predictors being smooth pursuits, family depression history, and NPC distance. The ROC analysis had an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.89; p < 0.001) in the good range., Conclusions: Accurate diagnosis of concussion in the clinic setting requires comprehensive evaluation in multiple domains, including detailed clinical interview, neurocognitive testing, and vestibular/ocular motor assessment, regardless of patient age. Our results provide preliminary support for the VOMS-C as a developmentally appropriate tool for concussion management.

The purpose of the current study was to examine predictors (e.g., pre-injury anxiety and sub-types, concussion symptom severity, neurocognitive performance, and vestibular/ocular-motor impairment) of post-injury anxiety scores following concussion among youth aged 10-18 years. This observational cohort study enrolled patients ( n  = 129) within 30 days of a diagnosed concussion. Patients completed Screening for Child Anxiety Related Disorders-Child Reports (SCARED-C), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Post-concussion Symptom Scale, neurocognitive testing, and Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the role of risk factors and clinical outcomes as predictors of mild (GAD-7 > 5) and moderate levels (GAD-7 > 10) of post-injury anxiety. Twenty-two percent ( n  = 28) of patients reported clinical levels of pre-injury anxiety, and 13% ( n  = 17) reported clinical levels of post-injury anxiety. The logistic regression model predicting mild or greater anxiety was significant ( R 2 = 31.7%; p  < 0.001) and supported pre-injury panic symptoms (OR = 1.38) and total symptom severity (OR = 1.04) as the most robust predictors. The logistic regression model predicting clinical anxiety was significant ( R 2 = 47.2%; p  < 0.001) and supported non-SRC injury type (OR = 9.48), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 1.74) and pre-injury panic symptoms (OR = 1.57) as the most robust predictors. Results suggest that clinicians should employ measures of pre-injury and post-injury emotional functioning when evaluating and treating concussion among adolescents. Moreover, these results highlight the importance of assessing different types of pre-injury and post-injury anxiety in the context of concussion management.

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the best combination of clinical variables associated with concussion subtypes using a multidomain assessment comprising medical history; symptoms; and cognitive, ocular, and vestibular impairment in a cohort of patients presenting to a concussion specialty clinic., Methods: Adolescent patients (n = 293) completed demographics and medical history, Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing, and vestibular ocular motor screening at their first visit (mean 7.6 ± 7.8 days postinjury) to a concussion specialty clinic. Each participant was adjudicated to have one or more subtype (anxiety/mood, cognitive, migraine, ocular, and vestibular) by a healthcare professional based on previously published criteria. A series of backward, stepwise logistic regressions were used to identify significant predictors of concussion subtypes, and predictive probabilities from the logistic regression models were entered into area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) models., Results: Each of 5 logistic regression models predicting primary subtypes accounted for 28%-50% of the variance (R2 = 0.28-0.50, p < 0.001) and included 2-8 significant predictors per model. Each of the models significantly differentiated the primary subtype from all other subtypes (AUC = 0.76-0.94, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: These findings suggest that each concussion subtype can be identified using specific outcomes from a multidomain assessment. Clinicians can employ such an approach to better identify and monitor recovery from subtypes as well as guide interventions.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine which assessments best identify athletes with sport-related concussion (SRC) from healthy controls in the acute/early subacute phase (within 10 days of SRC) of injury., Design: Prospective, cohort study., Setting: Specialty concussion clinic., Participants: Sixty-four athletes with SRC (52% male) and 59 matched (age and sex), healthy controls (56% male) aged 12 to 20 years (Mean [M] = 15.07, Standard Deviation [SD] = 2.23)., Assessment: Participants completed symptom, cognitive, vestibular/oculomotor, near point of convergence (NPC), and balance assessments., Main Outcome Measures: Univariate analyses were conducted to compare athletes with SRC to healthy controls across all assessments. Assessments that significantly differed between the SRC group and healthy controls were used as predictors in an enter method logistic regression (LR) model and subsequent forward stepwise LR., Results: Results of LR analyses indicated that symptom inventory and symptom provocation on vestibular/oculomotor assessments significantly predicted athletes with SRC versus controls. The forward stepwise LR accurately classified 84.6% of the overall sample (78.3% of athletes with SRC and 91.2% of controls were accurately predicted) and accounted for 60.5% of the variance in predicting athletes with SRC versus controls. Total symptom inventory score (P = 0.003) and vestibular/oculomotor symptom provocation (P < 0.01) were the most sensitive and specific measures in a comprehensive, multimodal assessment for distinguishing athletes with SRC from healthy controls within 10 days of injury., Conclusions: Elements within a multimodal evaluation that are the most robust at discriminating athletes with SRC from healthy controls in the acute/early subacute phase of injury include symptom report and provocation of symptoms on vestibular/oculomotor assessment. These assessments should be considered in conjunction with other objective assessments (ie, NPC measurement and cognitive testing) as part of a comprehensive evaluation of SRC., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: No studies to date have investigated the role of early clinical care in time to recovery from concussion in a pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of clinic presentation timing (≤ 7 days [early] compared to 8-20 days [late] from injury) in concussion assessment performance and risk for prolonged recovery (> 30 days) in pediatric concussion., Methods: This study is a retrospective cross-sectional study from a concussion clinic between April 2016 and January 2019, including 218 children and adolescents with diagnosed concussion, separated based on clinic presentation timing following injury: early (≤ 7 days) and late (8-20 days). Outcomes were recovery time, Postconcussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS), and demographics, medical history, and injury information. A general linear model and chi-square analyses were used to assess differences between early and late presentation, along with logistic regression, to predict prolonged recovery (> 30 days)., Results: Those with early presentation reported higher symptoms on VOMS subtests (79%-85%) compared to those with late presentation (61%-78%), with the exception of near-point of convergence distance and visual motion sensitivity (VMS). The strongest predictor of prolonged recovery was number of days to first clinic visit (OR 9.8). Positive VMS (OR 5.18), history of headache/migraine (OR 4.02), and PCSS score (OR 1.04) were also predictive of prolonged recovery., Conclusions: Despite patients in the early presentation group presenting with more positive VOMS scores, the early presentation group recovered sooner than patients in the late presentation group. Even after controlling for vestibular dysfunction, history of headache or migraine, and total symptom severity, days to first visit remained the most robust predictor of recovery > 30 days. These findings suggest that early, specialized medical care and intervention for children and adolescents with recent concussion is associated with normal recovery time. Clinicians should educate children and parents on the potential importance of early treatment to improve the odds of positive outcomes following concussion.

Background: Computerized Neurocognitive Testing (CNT) is frequently used for serial assessment of athletes following concussion. The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment for Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) is a commonly used CNT with well-documented test-retest reliability in healthy samples for intervals ranging from one month to two years. However, previous research has not explored use of ImPACT for other serial testing methodologies such as immediately before and after an experimental trial/intervention where administration on the same day may be necessary., Purpose: To examine the suitability of ImPACT for short-term, serial assessment of neurocognitive functioning., Study Design: Prospective, repeated measures research design., Methods: Forty-two healthy, college-aged individuals completed ImPACT twice, with a one-hour break between assessments. Reliability was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), reliable change indices (RCIs) and regression-based methods (RBM)., Results: No significant increases in mean ImPACT composite or symptom scores were observed between assessments. ICCs ranged from 0.34 to 0.74 (single)/0.51 to 0.85 (average). Across two test administrations, 92-100% and 93-98% of participants' change scores fell within cutoffs when utilizing the RCI and RBM, respectively., Conclusion: The ICCs for ImPACT composite and factor scores across the one-hour administration were consistent with previous studies. Only a small percentage of scores fell outside of RCI and RBM cutoffs. These statistical metrics suggest that ImPACT has sufficient reliability when repeating administration within one-hour., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)