Search

Background: High circulating tumor cell (CTC) count (CTChigh) is a strong adverse prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). In the STIC CTC trial (NCT01710605), run before the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors for ER+/HER2- mBC, we showed that CTC count (CTC arm) was non inferior to clinician’s choice (standard arm) on progression-free survival (PFS) to guide first line treatment selection between chemotherapy (CT) and endocrine therapy (ET) (Bidard et al., JAMA Oncol 2021). Of note, patients who had treatment escalated from ET (a priori clinician choice) to CT in the CTC arm, had a significantly longer PFS. We report here overall survival (OS) results of this multicenter CTC clinical utility trial. Methods: In the CTC arm, N=377 patients had their treatment determined by baseline CTC count: CT if CTChigh (≥5 CTCs/7.5 mL, CellSearch®), ET if CTClow. In the standard arm (N=378 patients), the choice was left to the investigator: CT if clinical high risk (Clinhigh), ET if clinical low risk (Clinlow). Therefore, patients with discordant Clinlow/CTChigh or Clinhigh/CTClow profiles had their first line treatment escalated from ET (standard arm) to CT (CTC arm) or de-escalated from CT (standard arm) to ET (CTC arm), respectively. Patients with concordant Clinlow/CTClow and Clinhigh/CTChigh profiles received ET and CT in both arms, respectively. Results: Among 755 randomized patients, N=189 (25.0%) had a Clinlow/CTChigh profile, N=103 (13.6%) Clinhigh/CTClow, N=363 (48.2%) Clinlow/CTClow and N=100 (13.2%) Clinhigh/CTChigh. OS was analyzed after a median follow-up of 57 months and 382 events (50.6%). In the Clinlow/CTChigh subgroup, CT in the CTC arm led a longer OS (mOS: 51.8 months [43.3-NR]) than ET in the standard arm (35.4 months [30.4-45.4]; HR=0.53 [0.36-0.78], p=0.001). In patients Clinhigh/CTClow, no significant difference was observed whether they received CT (standard arm) or ET (CTC arm) (45.9 months [36.3-59.8] vs 49.4 months [35.4-65.4]; HR=0.88 [0.51-1.51], p=0.63). Pooling the two discordant groups (Clinlow/CTChigh or Clinhigh/CTClow), the CTC-driven strategy was superior to the clinician-driven treatment decision (HR=0.63 [0.46-0.86], p=0.02). Pooling all concordant and discordant groups together, a median OS of 45.5 (95%CI=[40.9-51.1]) and 51.3 months [46.8-55.1] was observed in the standard and CTC arms, respectively (HR=0.84 [0.69-1.03], p=0.10). Conclusions: Prognostic information brought by CTC or standard factors is discordant in 40% of patients with ER+ HER2- mBC. In case of a discordant estimate, the STIC CTC trial shows the superiority on OS of the CTC-driven treatment decision strategy. These results also suggest a possible clinical utility of CTC to adjust systemic treatment for mBC in second and later lines, after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors. Funding:The study was funded by Institut Curie; the French National Cancer Institute (INCa), as part of the Programme de Soutien aux Techniques Innovantes Coûteuses 2011 (STIC 2011); and Menarini Silicon Biosystems (Castel Maggiore, Italy). Citation Format: Francois-Clement Bidard, Nicolas Kiavue, Catherine Alix-Panabières, Sylvain Dureau, Thomas Bachelot, Hugues Bourgeois, Anthony Gonçalves, Etienne Brain, Sylvain Ladoire, Florence Dalenc, Joseph Gligorov, Luis Teixeira, George Emile, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Delphine Loirat, Luc Cabel, Véronique Diéras, Frédérique Berger, William Jacot, Jean-Yves Pierga. GS3-09 Circulating Tumor Cells-driven choice of first line therapy for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer: overall survival analysis of the randomized STIC CTC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-09.

Background: The current first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is trastuzumab (T) plus pertuzumab (P) and a taxane. Despite advances in 1L SOC, most patients (pts) progress during maintenance therapy with T+P. Tucatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in combination with T and capecitabine for adults with HER2+ MBC, with and without brain metastases (BM). In HER2CLIMB, the addition of tucatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in pts with HER2+ MBC and was well tolerated. Adding tucatinib also reduced the risk of disease progression or death in pts with untreated and/or active BM (Murthy et al. 2020, Curigliano et al. 2021). HER2CLIMB-05 investigates whether adding tucatinib to 1L SOC as maintenance therapy will extend PFS while maintaining quality of life (QOL). Methods: HER2CLIMB-05 (NCT05132582) is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study evaluating tucatinib plus T+P as maintenance therapy for HER2+ MBC. Approximately 650 pts will be enrolled. Eligible pts will have advanced HER2+ disease, no progression on 4–8 cycles of prior 1L SOC, ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1, and no or asymptomatic BM. Exclusion criteria include prior treatment with anti-HER2 and/or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor TKI (prior SOC for early BC is permitted) or inability to undergo contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive either tucatinib or placebo twice daily, with T+P once every 21 days. Pts with HR+ disease may receive endocrine therapy. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints include OS (key endpoint), time to deterioration of health-related QOL, central nervous system PFS, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. PFS and OS will be compared using a 2-sided stratified log-rank test between treatment groups. Time-to-event endpoints will be summarized using the Kaplan–Meier method. PK and safety data will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Enrollment is ongoing in the US, with additional sites planned. Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Junji Tsurutani, Giuseppe Curigliano, Miguel Martín, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Konstantinos Tryfonidis, Libero Santarpia, Shan Yang, Véronique Diéras. Phase 3 study of tucatinib or placebo in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab as maintenance therapy for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (HER2CLIMB-05, trial in progress) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-16-03.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BM) have a poor prognosis and high clinical need for novel treatments; however, historically, studies have often excluded these patients. Although the BEACON study did not meet its primary end point, treatment with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician’s choice for patients with advanced breast cancer demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for the prespecified patient subgroup with preexisting, pretreated, and nonprogressive BM. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes in patients with BM treated with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician’s choice in a confirmatory trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial (ATTAIN) in patients with metastatic breast cancer and a history of stable pretreated BM who experienced disease progression while receiving chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The trial took place at 47 sites in 10 countries, and patients were enrolled between March 7, 2017, and November 6, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive etirinotecan pegol, 145 mg/m(2), every 21 days or chemotherapy (eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, or nab-paclitaxel). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was OS. Key secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and the clinical benefit rate. RESULTS: A total of 178 female patients (9 [5.1%] Asian, 8 [4.5%] Black or African American, and 123 [69.1] White individuals) were randomized to receive treatment with etirinotecan pegol (92 [51.7%]; median [range] age, 53 [27-79] years) or chemotherapy (86 [48.3%]; median [range] age, 52 [24-77] years). Median OS was similar in both groups (etirinotecan pegol, 7.8 months; chemotherapy, 7.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61-1.33; P = .60). Median progression-free survival for non–central nervous system metastases per blinded independent central review for etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy was 2.8 and 1.9 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.16; P = .18) and 3.9 vs 3.3 months, respectively, for central nervous system metastases (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05; P = .07). Safety profiles between the groups were largely comparable. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of the ATTAIN randomized clinical trial found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between treatment with etirinotecan pegol and chemotherapy in patients with BM. However, this study represents one of the largest published trials dedicated to patients with breast cancer and BM and may help to inform further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02915744

Purpose:The primary objective was to evaluate intracranial objective response rate (iORR) in patients receiving abemaciclib with brain or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) secondary to hormone receptor–positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Secondary objectives evaluated extracranial response, abemaciclib pharmacokinetics, brain metastases tissue exposure, and safety.Patients and Methods:This nonrandomized, phase II study (NCT02308020) enrolled patients in tumor subtype–specific cohorts A–D: A (HR+, HER2− MBC), B (HR+, HER2+ MBC), C (HR+ MBC LM), and D (brain metastases surgical resection). Abemaciclib 200 mg was administered twice daily as monotherapy or with endocrine therapy, or 150 mg twice daily with trastuzumab. Cohorts A and B used a Simon two-stage design.Results:In cohort A (n = 58), 3 patients were confirmed responders resulting in an iORR of 5.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.0–10.9], and the intracranial clinical benefit rate (iCBR) was 24% (95% CI, 13.1–35.2). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.3–16.4). A volumetric decrease in target intracranial lesions was experienced by 38% of patients. In cohort B (n = 27), there were no confirmed intracranial responses. An iCBR of 11% (95% CI, 0.0–23.0) was observed. Median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 4.2–14.3). A volumetric decrease in target intracranial lesions was experienced by 22% of patients. In cohort C (n = 10), one confirmed complete parenchymal response was observed. In cohort D (n = 9), unbound brain metastases concentrations of total active abemaciclib analytes were 96- [cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)] and 19-fold (CDK6) above in vitro IC50. Safety was consistent with prior studies.Conclusions:This study did not meet its primary endpoint. Abemaciclib was associated with an iCBR of 24% in patients with heavily pretreated HR+, HER2− MBC. Abemaciclib achieved therapeutic concentrations in brain metastases tissue, far exceeding those necessary for CDK4 and CDK6 inhibition. Further studies are warranted, including assessing novel abemaciclib-based combinations.

Quality metrics for the targeted sequencing of the 46 plasma samples.

Relation between number of ctDNA mutations and total number of somatic mutations.

Supplemental Figure 1. Study Design and Patient Disposition Supplemental Figure 2. Change in serum creatinine by visit Supplemental Figure 3. Change in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) by visit Supplemental Figure 4. Maximum observed value in cystatin C by visit Supplemental Figure 5. Minimum Observed Value in Neutrophils by Visit

Performance summary of somatic mutation calling using Mutect, Mutect+cmDetect, Varscan2, Varscan2+cmDetect with different filters on maximum variant allele read count and frequency in the blood

Supplemental Table 1. Post-discontinuation therapies

Change in parenchymal intracranial (Panel A1) and extracranial (Panel B) tumor size and best overall response, and duration of exposure to abemaciclib (Panel C) in cohort C (HR+, HER2- and HR+, HER2+ MBC with LM). 1Panel A is only for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC with LM, as the patients with HR+, HER2+ MBC had no intracranial parenchymal lesions or post-baseline scans. Note: Patients who did not have an intracranial or extracranial lesion or a post-baseline scan are not shown on waterfall plots. oIndicates patient received prior whole brain radiotherapy. +Indicates patient received prior stereotactic radiosurgery. #Indicates patient received concomitant endocrine therapy. Abbreviations: CR, complete response; HER2+/â^', human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive/negative; HR+, hormone receptor positive; MBC, metastatic breast cancer; LM, leptomeningeal metastases; NE, not estimable; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

Purpose: The phase II MONARCH 1 study was designed to evaluate the single-agent activity and adverse event (AE) profile of abemaciclib, a selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, in women with refractory hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Experimental Design: MONARCH 1 was a phase II single-arm open-label study. Women with HR+/HER2− MBC who had progressed on or after prior endocrine therapy and had 1 or 2 chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting were eligible. Abemaciclib 200 mg was administered orally on a continuous schedule every 12 hours until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of MONARCH 1 was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Other endpoints included clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Results: Patients (n = 132) had a median of 3 (range, 1–8) lines of prior systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, 90.2% had visceral disease, and 50.8% had ≥3 metastatic sites. At the 12-month final analysis, the primary objective of confirmed objective response rate was 19.7% (95% CI, 13.3–27.5; 15% not excluded); clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD≥6 months) was 42.4%, median progression-free survival was 6.0 months, and median overall survival was 17.7 months. The most common treatment-emergent AEs of any grade were diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea; discontinuations due to AEs were infrequent (7.6%).Conclusions: In this poor-prognosis, heavily pretreated population with refractory HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer, continuous dosing of single-agent abemaciciclib was well tolerated and exhibited promising clinical activity. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5218–24. ©2017 AACR.

List of mutations inserted in the simulated data set

Prior and concomitant therapies in patients from cohort A (HR+, HER2-) with intracranial clinical benefit.

ctDNA mutations identified by cmDetect for the breast cancer metastatic cases.

Purpose:Preclinical data identified the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib as synergistic with antiestrogens in inhibiting growth of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) human breast cancer models. This observation was validated clinically in the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III PALOMA-2 study.Experimental Design:To determine markers of sensitivity and resistance to palbociclib plus letrozole, we performed comprehensive biomarker analyses, investigating the correlation with progression-free survival (PFS), on baseline tumor tissues from PALOMA-2.Results:Despite a broad biomarker search, palbociclib plus letrozole demonstrated consistent PFS gains versus placebo plus letrozole, with no single biomarker or cassette of markers associated with lack of benefit from combination treatment. Palbociclib plus letrozole confers efficacy on both luminal A and B patients. Higher CDK4 levels were associated with endocrine resistance which was mitigated by the addition of palbociclib, whereas lower PD-1 levels were associated with greater palbociclib plus letrozole benefit. Tumors with more active growth factor signaling, as exemplified by increased expression of FGFR2 and ERBB3 mRNA, appeared to be associated with greater PFS gain from the addition of palbociclib.Conclusions:These data underscore the importance of CDK4/6 signaling in HR+/HER2− breast cancer and suggest that the interplay between steroid hormone and peptide growth factor signaling could drive dependence on CDK4/6 signaling.See related commentary by Anurag et al., p. 3

DNA extracted from cancer patients' whole blood may contain somatic mutations from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fragments. In this study, we introduce cmDetect, a computational method for the systematic identification of ctDNA mutations using whole-exome sequencing of a cohort of tumor and corresponding peripheral whole-blood samples. Through the analysis of simulated data, we demonstrated an increase in sensitivity in calling somatic mutations by combining cmDetect to two widely used mutation callers. In a cohort of 93 breast cancer metastatic patients, cmDetect identified ctDNA mutations in 54% of the patients and recovered somatic mutations in cancer genes EGFR, PIK3CA, and TP53. We further showed that cmDetect detected ctDNA in 89% of patients with confirmed mutated cell–free tumor DNA by plasma analyses (n = 9) within 46 pan-cancer patients. Our results prompt immediate consideration of the use of this method as an additional step in somatic mutation calling using whole-exome sequencing data with blood samples as controls. Cancer Res; 76(20); 5954–61. ©2016 AACR.

Methods that support the supplemental data provided

ctDNA mutations identified by somatic mutation callers and cmDetect in the simulated data set. Scatter plot of the allele frequency in blood (x-axis) and in tumor (y-axis) of the simulated ctDNA mutations. ctDNA mutations identified by Mutect (Varscan2) or cmDetect are shown in green; ctDNA mutations identified only by cmDetect are shown in blue; ctDNA mutations not identified are shown in gray.

Supplementary material

Clinical information for the 93 breast cancer and 60 pan cancer metastatic patients.

Number of ctDNA mutations according to previous chemotherapy treatment.

Purpose: Brain metastases develop in one third of patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Effective therapy for patients with central nervous system (CNS) progression after cranial radiation is extremely limited and represents a major clinical challenge. Lapatinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor/HER2 inhibitor, was associated with regressions of CNS lesions in a small phase 2 trial. The current study was done to further evaluate the CNS activity of lapatinib. The study was later amended to allow patients who progressed on lapatinib the option of receiving lapatinib plus capecitabine.Experimental Design: Eligible patients had HER2+ breast cancer, progressive brain metastases, prior trastuzumab, and cranial radiotherapy. The primary end point was CNS objective response, defined as ≥50% volumetric reduction of CNS lesion(s) in the absence of increasing steroid use, progressive neurologic signs and symptoms, or progressive extra-CNS disease.Results: Two-hundred and forty-two patients entered the study. CNS objective responses to lapatinib were observed in 6% of patients. In an exploratory analysis, 21% of patients experienced a ≥20% volumetric reduction in their CNS lesions. An association was observed between volumetric reduction and improvement in progression-free survival and neurologic signs and symptoms. Of the 50 evaluable patients who entered the lapatinib plus capecitabine extension, 20% experienced a CNS objective response and 40% experienced a ≥20% volumetric reduction in their CNS lesions.Conclusions: This study confirms the modest CNS antitumor activity of lapatinib. Additional responses were observed with the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine. Further studies of lapatinib-based regimens for CNS metastases from HER2+ breast cancer are warranted.

List of somatic mutations identified in the 93 breast cancer metastases

ctDNA mutations identified in the simulated data set by cmDetect

Details of the 1000 Genomes samples used in data simulation

Supplementary Data from Multicenter Phase II Study of Lapatinib in Patients with Brain Metastases from HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: In the BROCADE3 trial, addition of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, veliparib, to carboplatin/paclitaxel improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.88; P = 0.002) in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, germline BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer. A subset of patients discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on veliparib/placebo maintenance monotherapy until progression. Analyses in this patient subgroup are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel or placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel. Veliparib (120 mg twice daily) or placebo was given on days -2 to 5, carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/ml) on day 1, and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles. Patients who discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression received blinded study drug monotherapy at an increased dose of 300-400 mg twice daily continuously. PFS was the primary endpoint. Exploratory analyses were carried out in the subgroup of patients who received blinded study drug as monotherapy. A time-varying Cox model including data from all patients was also used to evaluate treatment effect in the combination and monotherapy phases. RESULTS: A total of 136 of 337 patients randomized to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and 58/172 patients randomized to placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on blinded veliparib or placebo monotherapy. In this blinded monotherapy subgroup, investigator-assessed median PFS from randomization was 25.7 months with veliparib versus 14.6 months with placebo. Hazard ratios from a time-varying Cox model favored veliparib during both combination therapy and monotherapy. Any-grade adverse events occurring in the monotherapy phase were primarily gastrointestinal. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia and anemia (4% each with veliparib; 5% and 2%, respectively, with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib maintenance monotherapy had a tolerable safety profile and may extend PFS following combination chemotherapy. ispartof: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY vol:33 issue:3 pages:299-309 ispartof: location:England status: published

Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of an HER2-directed antibody and a topoisomerase I inhibitor covalently linked via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. In DESTINY-Breast01, tolerability and efficacy of T-DXd including overall response rate, progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival have been demonstrated for HER2-positive metastatic and/or unresectable BC in patients (pts) relapsing after 2 or more anti-HER2-based regimens. In France, rapid and fair access to innovative drugs outside clinical trials, prior to their marketing authorization in a given indication, is granted by the French Health Agency, ANSM (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé), through cATU program. Here we report first real world evidence data from cATU program in HER2+ BC pts treated with T-DXd. Methods T-DXd 5.4mg/kg was given intravenously in monotherapy every 3 weeks in HER2-positive metastatic and/or unresectable BC pts who had previously received at least 2 lines of anti-HER2 regimens in the metastatic setting. Eligible pts needed to have normal neutrophil count and no left ventricular dysfunction. Pts with active or history of interstitial lung disease (ILD), pneumonitis, severe pulmonary disease were excluded. Clinical, biological and safety data were collected until the end of cATU, as well as treatment response according to RECIST 1.1., dose modification, treatment interruption and discontinuation. Analysis was performed on March 31th, 2021 on the basis of available collected data. Results From September 30th, 2020 to March 31th, 2021, 155 centers requested at least one ATU for a total of 539 adult pts; 468 requests were accepted and 71 were refused as they did not meet eligibility criteria. T-DXd was received by 459 pts with the following characteristics: 99.1% were women, median age was 58 years, 90.4% had a ECOG score of 0-1, 98.9% had initial HER2-positive BC (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+), 67% were hormone receptor positive. The main sites of metastases were bones (57.3%), lymph nodes (51.6%), lungs (36.2%), liver (33.1%), brain (28.1%) and cutaneous/subcutaneous (13.9%). Median time between initial diagnosis of primary BC and inclusion was 6.6 years (range: 6.6 months - 33.9 years). 81.7% of pts had previously received radiotherapy and 76.5% underwent surgery. The median number of prior cancer regimens in the metastatic setting was 4 (range: 2-22). 21.1% received 2 prior lines of metastatic treatments, 19.6% received 3 lines and 59.3% received 4 lines or more. 94.8% pts received prior trastuzumab emtansine, and 79.3% had prior pertuzumab. During follow-up, data on tumor assessment were available for 160 pts. Of these, 56.7% had complete or partial response and 12.1% had progression. Of the 459 treated pts, 97 pts (21.1%) experienced ≥ 1 Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) including 41 pts (8.9%) with ≥ 1 serious ADR. Most frequent ADRs were related to gastrointestinal toxicity (35.4%). During cATU, 17 cases (3.7%) with ILD or considered as ILD were reported but no cases had a fatal outcome (only grade 1 or 2 when reported by physicians). 13 fatal cases were reported (no drug-related deaths, attributed by physician). ADRs leading to T-DXd discontinuation were reported in 4 pts (0.9%). Dose reductions were reported in 17 pts (3.7%) and 21 pts (4.6%) had temporary interruptions. Conclusions We report here the first real world data from the French cATU in HER2-positive BC pts treated by T-DXd. The enrolment of 468 pts in 6 months illustrated the unmet medical need for this population. T-DXd had antitumor activity with a similar response rate to that reported in previous clinical studies. T-DXd was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed. Citation Format: Thierry Petit, Nawale Hajjaji, Eric-Charles Antoine, Marc-Antoine Benderra, Michel Gozy, Cyril Foa, Jean-Loup Mouysset, Julien Grenier, Mireille Mousseau, Audrey Mailliez, Mahasti Saghatchian, Emma Lachaier, Isabelle Desmoulins, Audrey Hennequin, Patricia Maes, Delphine Loirat, Francesco Ricci, Véronique Diéras, Dominique Berton, Florence Lai Tiong, Luis Teixeira, Nadine Dohollou, Christelle Lévy, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Yves Pierga. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive metastatic or unresectable breast cancer (BC): First real-life data from the cohort temporary authorization for use (cATU) program in France [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-26.

Background: In ASCENT, patients with mTNBC refractory to or relapsing after ≥2 prior chemotherapies (at least one in the metastatic setting) were randomized 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan (SG) or single-agent treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine). Primary endpoint was progression free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety. Here we examined whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) differed by clinical response. Methods: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) version 3 was used to assess HRQoL at baseline and on day 1 of each treatment cycle. This analysis included intention-to-treat patients who had a completed at least one of the 15 domains/scales at baseline and at least one evaluable assessment at post-baseline visits based on EORTC QLQ-C30. Patients were classified as responders (partial or complete disease response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease or not evaluable) based on best overall response (RECIST). A mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to estimate leastsquare (LS) mean EORTC QLQC30 score changes from baseline using all HRQoL data assessed during Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) to C6D1 (where n was ≥25 in both treatment arms) for responders and nonresponders within each treatment group. Results: Mean QLQ-C30 subscale scores at baseline were similar between treatment arms. The analysis included 236 patients in the SG arm of the full trial population, of whom 82 (35%) were clinical responders; and 183 in the TPC arm, of whom 11 (6%) were clinical responders. Due to the small number of TPC responders, inferential statistical testing to compare between-group difference was not performed.Irrespective of their clinical response status, patients treated with SG showed more favorable LS mean changes than patients who received TPC in all EORTC QLQ-C30 domains, except for nausea/vomiting and diarrhea (Table). Overall, LS mean changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in SG nonresponders were less favorable than those in SG responders, but more favorable than those in TPC responders and TPC nonresponders for most EORTC QLQ-C30 domains. Conclusions: The analysis demonstrates that regardless of response status, SG responders and non-responders showed a better trend in HRQoL changes than TPC. Patients who achieved a tumor response to SG may benefit most in HRQoL. Although patients treated with SG reported higher rates of diarrhea, this did not generate a negative impact on their overall quality of life or functioning. Table: Mixed effects model least-square mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score changes from baselineLeast-square mean change from baseline (95% confidence interval)SG responders(N=82)SG nonresponders(N=154)TPC responders(N=11)TPC non-responders(N=172)Global health status/QoL2.46 (-1.52, 6.43)-0.57 (-3.68, 2.54)-1.64 (-10.22, 6.95)-2.29 (-5.63, 1.05)FunctioningPhysical2.93 (-0.92, 6.79)0.22 (-2.71, 3.15)-3.47 (-11.93, 4.99)-3.75 (-6.87, -0.63)Role-0.35 (-5.74, 5.04)-3.23 (-7.45, 0.99)-8.40 (-19.93, 3.13)-7.33 (-11.88, -2.78)Emotional6.20 (2.23, 10.18)1.97 (-1.12, 5.06)4.87 (-3.70, 13.44)0.08 (-3.24, 3.40)Cognitive0.90 (-2.99, 4.79)-2.25 (-5.26, 0.76)-4.46 (-12.87, 3.95)-1.26 (-4.49, 1.98)Social2.06 (-3.50, 7.61)-3.35 (-7.65, 0.95)-5.79 (-18.29, 6.72)-4.36 (-8.99, 0.27)SymptomsFatigue0.90 (-3.49, 5.28)2.84 (-0.60, 6.29)4.15 (-5.34, 13.65)6.65 (2.93, 10.38)Nausea/vomiting4.68 (1.42, 7.95)4.03 (1.42, 6.64)1.38 (-5.53, 8.29)2.62 (-0.21, 5.45)Pain-11.40 (-16.43, -6.36)-8.57 (-12.48, -4.66)-11.99 (-22.85, -1.13)-0.24 (-4.47, 3.99)Dyspnea-7.88 (-13.09, -2.67)-1.90 (-5.93, 2.13)1.97 (-9.33, 13.27)3.86 (-0.47, 8.18)Insomnia-6.12 (-11.99, -0.26)-3.51 (-8.04, 1.02)4.83 (-7.85, 17.51)-0.98 (-5.86, 3.90)Appetite loss0.22 (-5.25, 5.70)5.45 (1.15, 9.75)8.67 (-3.05, 20.40)4.60 (-0.05, 9.26)Constipation0.93 (-4.57, 6.43)2.20 (-2.09, 6.49)3.87 (-7.96, 15.70)3.52 (-1.12, 8.16)Diarrhea16.03 (10.32, 21.74)13.65 (9.19, 18.11)2.46 (-9.88, 14.80)-1.53 (-6.34, 3.29)Financial difficulties-3.57 (-8.54, 1.39)-2.44 (-6.21, 1.34)-4.41 (-15.27, 6.46)0.61 (-3.42, 4.64)A higher score for a functional domain represents a higher or healthier level of functioning; a higher score for the global health status/QoL represents a higher overall HRQoL; but a higher score for a symptom domain represents a higher level of symptomatology or problems Citation Format: Sibylle Loibl, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Mafalda Oliveira, Hope S. Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Sara A. Hurvitz, Adam Brufsky, Kevin M Kalinsky, Javier Cortes, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Lisa A. Carey, Luca Gianni, Véronique Diéras, Ling Shi, Mahdi Gharaibeh, Luciana Preger, Lee Moore, See Phan, Martine Piccart. Assessment of health-related quality of life by clinical response from the phase 3 ASCENT study in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-01.

Background: SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG is FDA approved for pts with mTNBC who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies (≥1 in the metastatic setting). The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts treated in second line or greater (2L+) mTNBC demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit of SG over single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (median PFS: 4.8 vs 1.7 months, HR 0.43, P Citation Format: Javier Cortés, Aditya Bardia, Delphine Loirat, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Mafalda Oliveira, Sara A. Hurvitz, Adam Brufsky, Sagar Sardesai, Kevin M Kalinsky, Tiffany Traina, Erika Hamilton, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Véronique Diéras, Lisa A. Carey, Martine Piccart, Sibylle Loibl, Hope S. Rugo, Yanni Zhu, See Phan, Luca Gianni. Post-progression therapy outcomes in patients (pts) from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-15.

Background The everolimus (EVE)-exemestane combination has been included in the International guidelines for metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer (mBC) since the results of the Bolero-2 trial. Marketing authorization has been granted in France in July 2012. A first report of the UNICANCER Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Research program described the real world use of everolimus therapy (ESMO 2017, #266). We report here updated data with long-term overall survival (OS) analyses, focusing on patients treated from 2012 onwards. Methods All patients (pts) who initiated treatment for a newly diagnosed mBC between 2008 and 2017 in all 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers have been included in the real life ESME database, which collects retrospective data using a clinical trial-like methodology. The primary endpoint of the present report was overall survival in pts who received everolimus. In order to adjust for differences between groups (EVE treated vs non EVE treated patients), we analyzed the impact of everolimus on OS and PFS by using a propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) sensitivity analyses, built with relevant cancer-related clinical variables in relation to survival and allocation of treatment. Those analyses were performed by line 1, 2 or 3 of treatment for mBC. Results The ESME program included 23,698 pts of whom 1897 with HR+/HER2- mBC received at least 1 dose of EVE and were diagnosed after 2012. Median age was 63 y (22-103). EVE pts were slightly younger than non-EVE pts (25.9% and 23.7% under 52 y, respectively, p=0.0574). EVE treated pts had more frequent non visceral metastases (52.3% vs 47.9%) and bone only metastases (38.5% vs 31.3%) at metastatic diagnosis, and less symptoms at mBC diagnosis (42.4% vs 47.5%) than non-EVE pts (all p values HR (CI95%)p value12 months OS EVE vs not (unadjusted Kaplan Meier)Line 10.34 (0.16-072).005497% vs 93%Line 20.34 (0.22-0.52) Citation Format: Hélène Francois-Martin, Audrey Lardy-Cleaud, Barbara Pistilli, Christelle Levy, Véronique Diéras, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Séverine Guiu, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Audrey Mailliez, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Thierry Petit, Mony Ung, Isabelle Desmoulins, Paule Augereau, Thomas Bachelot, Lionel Uwer, Marc Debled, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Corinne Veyret, Antony Goncalves, Michael Chevrot, Paul H Cottu. Long term results with everolimus in advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer in a multicenter national real world observational study (ESME) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-19.

PARP inhibitors are effective in different types of tumors such as ovarian, breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer. Many studies are in progress and may lead to prescription evolution. PARP inhibitors prescription is almost reserved to patients with a constitutional BRCA mutation or a somatic BRCA alteration or a tumor with a deficiency in homologous recombination. Nowadays, the diagnosis of homologous recombination deficit, HRD, is possible with the prescription of a myChoice CDx (Myriad) test. PARP inhibitors are studied in association with chemotherapy and targeted therapies but also with radiotherapy and with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Access to PARP inhibitors is challenged with the emergence of resistance mechanism. Various trials are now studying the possibility of reversing these resistance mechanisms.

ImportanceEvidence suggests that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (ERBB2+ [formerly HER2+]) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to their hormone receptor (HR) status. The place of endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with HR+/ERBB2+ is still not clearly defined in this setting.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of HR status and first-line inclusion of ET with outcomes among patients with ERBB2+ MBC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study was an analysis of clinical data from the French clinical Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, including patients with MBC who started treatment between 2008 and 2017. The last date of follow-up was June 18, 2020. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to May 2022.ExposuresPatients were treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy and either chemotherapy (CT) with or without ET or ET alone. For the study of the association of maintenance ET with outcomes, we included patients treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without maintenance ET.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMedian overall survival (OS) and median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis included age at MBC, time to MBC, number of metastatic sites, type of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.ResultsAmong 4145 women with ERBB2+ MBC, 2696 patients had HR+ (median [IQR] age, 58.0 [47.0-67.0] years) and 1449 patients had HR– (56.0 [47.0-64.0] years) tumors. The median OS for patients with HR+ vs HR− tumors was 55.9 months (95% CI, 53.7-59.4 months) vs 42.0 months (95% CI, 38.8-45.2 months), confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.56; P P = .01), and the HR was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without ET vs 203 patients receiving ERBB2-targeted therapy with ET, regardless of type of ERBB2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab or trastuzumab with pertuzumab). This result was confirmed by matching patients using a propensity score. Using the time-dependent ET variable among patients with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT, those with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P P Conclusions and RelevanceThese results suggest that ET-containing first-line regimens may be associated with benefits among a subgroup of patients with HR+/ERBB2+ MBC.