Search

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences., Methods: ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab., Results: In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively)., Conclusions: We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD., (© 2024. Takeda Pharmaceuticals.)

Background and Objectives: Current data on ustekinumab therapy in children with ulcerative colitis (UC) or unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (IBDU) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in pediatric UC and IBDU., Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 16 centers affiliated with the IBD Interest and Porto groups of ESPGHAN. Children with UC or IBDU treated with ustekinumab were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging data as well as adverse events were recorded. Analyses were all based on the intention-to-treat principle., Results: Fifty-eight children (39 UC and 19 IBDU, median age 14.5 [IQR 11.5-16.5] years) were included. All had failed biologic therapies, and 38 (66%) had failed two or more biologics. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFR) was observed in 27 (47%), 33 (57%), and 37 (64%) children at 16, 26, and 52 weeks, respectively. Normalization of C-reactive protein and calprotectin < 150 μg/g were achieved in 60% and 52%, respectively, by 52 weeks. Endoscopic and radiologic remissions were reached in 8% and 23%, respectively. The main predictors of CFR were diagnosis of UC compared with IBDU (hazard ratio [HR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.03-4.85; p = 0.041) and no prior vedolizumab therapy (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.11-4.27; p = 0.023). Ustekinumab serum levels were not associated with disease activity. Adverse events were recorded in six (10%) children, leading to discontinuation of the drug in three., Conclusion: Based on these findings, ustekinumab appears as an effective therapy for pediatric refractory UC and IBDU. The potential efficacy should be weighed against the risks of serious adverse events., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Objectives: To compare efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of the proposed UST biosimilar SB17 with reference UST in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: In this randomized double-blind study, subjects were randomized to receive 45 mg of SB17 or UST subcutaneously at week 0, 4, and every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at week 12 with an equivalence margin of [-15%, 15%]. Other secondary efficacy, safety, PK, and immunogenicity endpoints were measured through week 28., Results: Two hundred forty-nine subjects were randomized to SB17, 254 to UST. Adjusted difference of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index change from baseline at week 12 of -0.6% (95% confidence interval; -3.780, 2.579) was within the equivalence margin. Physician's Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index were also comparable. Overall treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable (SB17: 48.2%, UST: 48.8%). The overall incidence of antidrug antibodies up to Week 28 was 13.3% with SB17 and 39.4% with UST., Limitations: Data were only through week 28., Conclusion: SB17 was clinically biosimilar to UST up to week 28., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Feldman has received research, speaking, and/or consulting support from Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, Janssen, Alovtech, vTv Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Samsung Bioepis, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Dermavant, Arcutis, Novartis, Novan, UCB, Helsinn, Sun Pharma, Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Mylan, Celgene, Ortho Dermatology, Menlo, Merck & Co, Qurient, Forte, Arena, Biocon, Accordant, Argenx, Sanofi, Regeneron, the National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Teladoc, BMS, Ono, Micreos, Eurofins, Informa, UpToDate, and the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Feldman is founder and part owner of Causa Research and holds stock in Sensal Health. Dr Narbutt is an investigator and/or lecturer for Novartis, Eli Lilly, Almirall, AbbVie, Celltrion, Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Janssen, and UCB and participated in SB17-3001 study as an investigator and received investigational grant from Samsung Bioepis. Dr Girolomoni has received personal fees from AbbVie, Abiogen, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Leo Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, and Sanofi. Drs Brzezicki, Reznichenko, Zegadlo-Myłik, Pulka, Dmowska-Stecewicz, Klujszo, Rekalov, and Rajzer participated in SB17-3001 study as an investigator and received investigator grants from Samsung Bioepis. Authors J. Lee, M. Lee, and Dr Rho are employees of Samsung Bioepis Co, Ltd and owns stocks of Samsung Biologics., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Previously published long-term safety data reported a favourable ustekinumab safety profile for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. We present the final cumulative safety data from pooled ustekinumab IBD phase 2/3 clinical studies through 5 years in Crohn's disease [CD] and 4 years in ulcerative colitis [UC]., Methods: In phase 3 studies, patients received a single intravenous placebo or ustekinumab [130 mg or ~6 mg/kg] induction dose followed by subcutaneous maintenance doses of placebo or ustekinumab [90 mg q8w or q12w]. Analyses included all patients who received one dose of study treatment and included patients who were biologic-naïve and patients with a history of biologic failure. Safety outcomes are summarized and presented using number of events per 100 patient-years of follow-up and corresponding 95% confidence intervals., Results: In this final pooled safety analysis, 2575 patients were treated with ustekinumab with 4826 patient-years of follow-up. Rates of key safety events, including major adverse cardiac events and malignancies, were similar between placebo and ustekinumab or not higher for ustekinumab. Opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, and malignancies were reported infrequently. Rates of key safety events in the IBD group were no higher in the ustekinumab group than in the placebo group for both patients who were biologic-naïve or who had a history of biologic failure. No lymphomas or cases of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome [formerly known as reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome] were reported., Conclusion: The final cumulative ustekinumab safety data through 5 years in CD and 4 years in UC demonstrated favourable safety compared to placebo and continue to support the well-established safety profile across all approved indications., Clinical Trials.gov Numbers: NCT00265122, NCT00771667, NCT01369329, NCT01369342, NCT01369355, NCT02407236., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Background: Systemic immunomodulatory agents are indicated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Perioperative use of these medications may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and complication., Objective: To evaluate the risk of SSI and complication in patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease receiving immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa [TNF-α] inhibitors, interleukin [IL] 12/23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 costimulator, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate [MTX]) undergoing surgery., Methods: We performed a search of the MEDLINE PubMed database of patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease on immune therapy undergoing surgery., Results: We examined 48 new or previously unreviewed studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease., Conclusion: For low-risk procedures, TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, ustekinumab, abatacept, MTX, CsA, and apremilast can safely be continued. For intermediate- and high-risk surgery, MTX, CsA, apremilast, abatacept, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, and ustekinumab are likely safe to continue; however, a case-by-case approach is advised. Acitretin can be continued for any surgery. There is insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations on tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Feldman has received research, speaking and/or consulting support from Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, Janssen, Alvotech, vTv Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Samsung, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Dermavant, Arcutis, Novartis, Novan, UCB, Helsinn, Sun Pharma, Almirall, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Mylan, Celgene, Ortho Dermatology, Menlo, Merck & Co, Qurient, Forte, Arena, Biocon, Accordant, Argenx, Sanofi, Regeneron, the National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Teladoc, BMS, Ono, Micreos, Eurofins, Informa, UpToDate, and the National Psoriasis Foundation and is a founder and part owner of Causa Research and holds stock in Sensal Health. Dr Wu is or has been an investigator, consultant, or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, DermTech, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, EPI Health, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, and Zerigo Health. Dr Hsu has served on the advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, LEO Pharma, and Sanofi and has served on the registries/clinical trials for CorEvitas, PROSE, Argenx, and Cabaletta. Dr Armstrong has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Almirall, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, BI, BMS, EPI, Incyte, Leo, UCB, Janssen, Lilly, Mindera, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Sun, Dermavant, Dermira, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Pfizer. Dr Wallace has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Pfizer, Target RWE, Kyowa, Amgen, Arcutis, and Argenx. Dr Lee has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Regeneron, Pfizer, Trevi Therapeutics, AbbVie, Mayne Pharmaceuticals, Incyte Corp, Castle Creek, Pyramid Bioscience, Amyrt, Krystal Biotech, Arcutis, Celgene, Target Pharma, Amgen, Novartis, UCB, Galderma, Kiniksa, Avita, Janssen, MoonLake Pharmaceuticals, and Timber Pharmaceuticals. Dr Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Sanofi Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, and LEO Pharma. Dr Schwartzman has served as a speaker and/or consultant to AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, Myriad, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, Stelexis, Jubilant, and Teijin and has served as a board member to the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Gladman has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB and has received research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Liu has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Sanofi Regeneron, Arcutis, Dermavant, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB, Incyte, Amgen, and Evelo. Dr Koo has served on the advisory board/consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle, Dermavant, Incyte, Janssen, Eli Lilly, EPI, Leo, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics/Valeant, Pfizer, Regeneron/Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and UCB. Dr Hawkes has served on the advisory board/consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Janssen, LearnSkin, LEO, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB, has served on the medical/scientific board for the National Psoriasis Foundation and International Psoriasis Council (IPC), and has stock ownership/equity in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr Reddy has served on the advisory board/consultant UCB, Novartis, Fresenius, Amgen, AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer. Dr Prussick has served as a scientific adviser and/or speaker to of Amgen, Janssen, AbbVie, and Novartis and has served as a board member to the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Yamauchi has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Sun Pharma, BMS, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, and Novartis. Dr Lewitt has received grants/research support from Novan, Galderma, Leo, Lilly, DermTech, and Amgen and has served as a speaker’s bureau/consultant/advisory board for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Galderma, Pfizer, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, Dermavant, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Soung has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Celgene, Amgen, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Pfizer, Ortho Dermatologics, National Psoriasis Foundation (non-profit), LEO, Novartis, Regeneron/Sanofi, UCB, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Dermavant, Bristol Myers Squibb, Arcutis, KoBioLabs, and Castle Biosciences. Dr Weinberg has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Dermavant, Lilly, Janssen, BMS, Amgen, and UCB and has received research grants from Arcutis, Dermavant, AbbVie, UCB, Janssen, and Lilly. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai, has received research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant Sciences, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Inozyme, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and UCB, Inc, and is a consultant for AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Inc, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aristea Therapeutics, Avotres Therapeutics, BioMX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Brickell Biotech, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, CorEvitas, Dermavant Sciences, Evommune, Inc, Facilitation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Hexima Ltd, Incyte, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, National Society of Cutaneous Medicine, New York College of Podiatric Medicine, Pfizer, Seanergy, SUN Pharma, Verrica, and Vial. Dr Glick has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Janssen, Galderma, Sun Pharma, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Dermavant Sciences, Incyte, EPI/Novan, BMS, Nimbus Lakshmi, Cara Therapeutics, Dermira, Sanofi/Genzyme, Regeneron, Pfizer, ChemoCentryx, Ortho Dermatologics, UCB, Brickell, Biotech, CorEvitas Registry PSO, CorEvitas Registry AD, PROSE Registry for AD. Dr Kircik has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, board member, and/or speaker to Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie, Allergan, Inc, Almirall, Amgen, Inc, Arcutis, Biogen-Idec, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Breckinridge Pharma, Celgene, Centocor, Inc, Cellceutix, Cipher, Combinatrix, Connetics Corporation, Coria, Dermavant, Dermira, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, Idera, Johnson & Johnson, Leo, Maruho, Merck, Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp, Novartis AG, Promius, PharmaDerm, Pfizer, Serono (Merck Serono International SA), Stiefel Laboratories, Inc, Sun Pharma, Taro, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl, and XenoPort. Dr Desai has served on the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation and holds multiple other leadership positions in dermatologic organizations, and has served as a researcher and/or consultant for Pfizer, Lilly, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galderma, and other organizations. Drs James and Zaino and Author Rosenberg have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of risankizumab as compared with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease are unknown., Methods: In this phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial with blinded assessment of end points, patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy or unacceptable side effects with such therapy were randomly assigned to receive risankizumab or ustekinumab at standard doses for 48 weeks. The two primary end points, which were tested sequentially, were clinical remission at week 24 (defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of <150 [range, 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity]), which was analyzed in the first 50% of patients to complete the week 24 visit, with a noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points; and endoscopic remission at week 48 (defined as a score of ≤4, a decrease of ≥2 points from baseline, and no subscore >1 in any individual variable on the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease]), which was analyzed for superiority in 100% of the patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of risankizumab or ustekinumab., Results: In the full intention-to-treat population for the efficacy analysis, 230 of 255 patients (90.2%) who received risankizumab and 193 of 265 patients (72.8%) who received ustekinumab completed all the assigned treatments. Both primary end points were met; risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 (58.6% vs. 39.5%; adjusted difference, 18.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6 to 30.3) and superior to ustekinumab with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48 (31.8% vs. 16.2%; adjusted difference, 15.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.4 to 22.9; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups., Conclusions: In this head-to-head clinical trial of risankizumab and ustekinumab involving patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had unacceptable side effects with anti-TNF therapy or an inadequate response to such therapy, risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 and superior with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48. (Funded by AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04524611.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Evidence on serological responses to vaccination in children exposed to ustekinumab (UST) or vedolizumab (VDZ) in utero is lacking. This multicentre prospective study aimed to assess the impact of prenatal exposure to UST or VDZ due to maternal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on serological responses to vaccination and other immunological parameters in exposed children. Children aged ≥ 1 year who were exposed in utero to UST or VDZ and completed at least 1-year of mandatory vaccination were included. We assessed the serological response to vaccination (non-live: tetanus, diphtheria, and Haemophilus influenzae B; live: mumps, rubella, and measles), whole blood count, and immunoglobulin levels. The control group comprised unexposed children born to mothers without IBD. A total of 23 children (median age, 25 months) exposed to UST (n = 13) or VDZ (n = 10) and 10 controls (median age, 37 months) were included. The serological response to vaccination was comparable between the UST and VDZ groups and controls, with an adequate serological response rate of ≥ 80%. Only children exposed to UST showed a slightly reduced serological response to mumps (67% vs. 86% in controls), whereas all children exposed to VDZ showed an adequate response. The majority of the exposed children had normal levels of individual immunoglobulin classes, similar to the controls. No severe pathology was observed in any of the children.Conclusion: Despite the limited sample size, our findings suggest that in utero exposure to VDZ or UST does not significantly impair the vaccine response or broader immunological parameters in exposed children., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Long-term data on ustekinumab in real-life Crohn's disease patients are still missing, though randomized controlled trials demonstrated it as a favorable therapeutic option. We aimed to evaluate ustekinumab's clinical efficacy, drug sustainability, and safety in a prospective, nationwide, multicenter Crohn's disease patient cohort with a three-year follow-up. Crohn's disease patients on ustekinumab treatment were consecutively enrolled from 9 Hungarian Inflammatory Bowel Disease centers between January 2019 and May 2020. Patient and disease characteristics, treatment history, clinical disease activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI)), biomarkers, and endoscopic activity (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD)) were collected for three-years' time. A total of 148 patients were included with an overall 48.9% of complex behavior of the Crohn's disease and 97.2% of previous anti-TNF exposure. The pre-induction remission rates were 12.2% (HBI), and 5.1% (SES-CD). Clinical remission rates (HBI) were 52.2%, 55.6%, and 50.9%, whereas criteria of an endoscopic remission were fulfilled in 14.3%, 27.5%, and 35.3% of the subjects at the end of the first, second, and third year, respectively. Dose intensification was high with 84.0% of the patients on an 8-weekly and 29.9% on a 4-weekly regimen at the end of year 3. Drug sustainability was 76.9% during the follow-up period with no serious adverse events observed. Ustekinumab in the long-term is an effective, sustainable, and safe therapeutic option for Crohn's disease patients with severe disease phenotype and high previous anti-TNF biological failure, requiring frequent dose intensifications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease is increasing. tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors medicines improved the prognosis of affected subjects. Nonetheless, a proportion of patients do not respond or lose response to treatment. Newer biologics, like ustekinumab, have been approved for adults. The pediatric off-label use of these drugs is increasing, despite limited safety evidence. We report a case of disseminated mycobacterial infection (MI) presenting with reactive polyarthritis (Poncet's disease, PD) in a girl with Crohn's disease receiving various immunosuppressants, including ustekinumab., Case Report: A 12-year-old girl with Crohn's disease was admitted for acute-onset migratory polyarthritis of large and small joints and opioid-resistant pain. She had recently received adalimumab and methotrexate and was currently under treatment with ustekinumab. She was vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and screened for tuberculosis before starting immunosuppressants. Interferon-gamma release assay, Mantoux test and chest computed tomography scan were negative. Disseminated MI with PD was diagnosed following positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in blood and intestinal biopsies (with negative in synovial fluid and gastric aspirate). Whole-exome sequencing did not identify any genetic susceptibility to MI. Antituberculosis treatment eradicated MI., Conclusions: Children with inflammatory bowel disease receiving combination immunosuppressive treatments including tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors and anti-IL-12/23 agents are at higher risk for MI. Disseminated MI should be considered and ruled out in these patients when presenting with pulmonary, extrapulmonary or unusual clinical manifestations, like PD. The collection of multiple specimens (including intestinal biopsies) for mycobacterial culture is recommended when mycobacterial disease is suspected., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ustekinumab and tofacitinib have recently been approved for the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there is no evidence on how they should be positioned in the therapeutic algorithm. The aim of this study was to compare tofacitinib and ustekinumab as third-line therapies in UC patients in whom anti-TNF and vedolizumab had failed., Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The primary outcome was disease progression, defined as the need for steroids, therapy escalation, UC-related hospitalization and/or surgery. Secondary outcomes were clinical remission, normalization of C-reactive protein, endoscopic remission, treatment withdrawal, and adverse events., Results: One-hundred seventeen UC patients were included in the study and followed for a median time of 11.6 months (q 1 -q 3, 5.5-18.7). Overall, 65% of patients were treated with tofacitinib and 35% with ustekinumab. In the entire study cohort, 63 patients (54%) had disease progression during the follow-up period. Treatment with ustekinumab predicted increased risk of disease progression compared to treatment with tofacitinib in Cox regression analysis (HR: 1.93 [95% CI: 1.06-3.50] p = 0.030). Twenty-eight (68%) patients in the ustekinumab group and 35 (46%) in the tofacitinib group had disease progression over the follow-up period (log-rank test, p < 0.054). No significant differences were observed for the secondary outcomes. Six and 22 adverse events occurred in the ustekinumab and tofacitinib groups, respectively (15% vs. 31%, p = 0.11)., Conclusions: Tofacitinib was more efficacious in reducing disease progression than ustekinumab in this cohort of refractory UC patients. However, prospective head-to-head clinical trials are needed as to confirm these data., (© 2023 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Background: Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have signs or symptoms of active disease despite multiple treatment attempts. This emerging concept is defined as difficult-to-treat IBD., Aim: The objective of this study was to investigate for the first time the treatment persistence, efficacy and safety of biologics or small molecules used in 4th or 5th line therapy., Methods: We reviewed all consecutive patients with IBD treated at the Nancy University Hospital between July 2022 and April 2023 with the 4th or 5th line treatment for at least three months. The primary outcome was to assess the persistence rate of 4th and 5th line therapy., Results: We enrolled 82 patients with IBD (4th line: 44; 5th line: 38). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the duration of risankizumab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab therapy did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) as 4th and 5th line treatment. The restricted mean survival time analysis showed that the persistence rate of risankizumab was the highest as 4th line therapy (risankizumab vs. vedolizumab: 36.0 and 29.4 weeks, respectively, p = 0.008; risankizumab vs. ustekinumab: 36.0 and 32.8 weeks, respectively, p = 0.035). In multivariate regression, Crohn's disease diagnosis (Odd ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.7-12.4) was significantly associated with treatment persistence., Conclusion: In this first real-world setting, risankizumab could have a longer persistence rate as 4th line treatment for IBD than other agents. Persistence of biological agents was greater in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis. More studies are needed to compare treatment efficacy in patients with difficult-to-treat IBD., (© 2024 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic condition that may require long-term treatment. We report the final efficacy and safety results of the UNIFI long-term extension study of ustekinumab in patients with UC through 4 years., Methods: Ustekinumab induction responders who completed 44 weeks of maintenance treatment and agreed to enter the long-term extension continued their subcutaneous maintenance therapy (90 mg ustekinumab every 8 or 12 weeks [q8w or q12w] or placebo). Starting at week 56, randomized patients could receive dose adjustment to 90 mg q8w. Symptoms and adverse events were assessed through the study; endoscopic assessment was conducted at week 200., Results: Of the 348 patients randomized to subcutaneous ustekinumab at maintenance baseline (q8w and q12w combined), 55.2% were in symptomatic remission at week 200. A greater proportion of biologic-naive patients (67.2% [117/174]) were in symptomatic remission than those with a history of biologic failure (41.6% [67/161]). Among patients in symptomatic remission at week 200, 96.4% were corticosteroid-free. Of the 171 patients with endoscopic evaluation at week 200, 81.6% (71/87) in the q12w group and 79.8% (67/84) in the q8w group had endoscopic improvement. From weeks 156 to the final safety visit (up to week 220), no deaths, major adverse cardiovascular events, or tuberculosis occurred in patients receiving ustekinumab. Nasopharyngitis, UC worsening, and upper respiratory tract infections were the most frequently reported adverse events., Discussion: The long-term efficacy of ustekinumab maintenance in patients with UC was confirmed through 4 years. No new safety signals were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02407236., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SB17 (Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea), a proposed biosimilar of ustekinumab (UST) against reference UST (Stelara, Janssen Biotech, Horsham, PA, USA)., Materials and Methods: This double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, single-dose study randomized 201 healthy adult subjects 1 : 1 : 1 to receive 45 mg of SB17, European Union-sourced UST (EU-UST) or United States of America-sourced UST (US-UST) via subcutaneous (SC) injection. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC inf ) and maximum serum concentration (C max ). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were investigated., Results: All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of AUC inf and C max between groups were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 0.8 - 1.25. The geometric LSMeans ratios of AUC inf and C max were 0.99 and 0.90 for SB17/EU-UST, 1.01 and 0.94 for SB17/US-UST, and 1.02 and 1.05 for EU-UST/US-UST, respectively. The proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable between SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST (68.7, 58.2, and 65.7%). No deaths, serious adverse events (SAEs), or severe TEAEs were reported. The incidence of subjects testing positive for post-dose anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was 26.9%, 34.3%, and 34.3% in the SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST groups, respectively. Among the subjects with a positive ADA result at day 99/end of study, 53.8% (SB17 n = 5, EU-UST n = 12, and US-UST n = 11) were positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs)., Conclusion: This study demonstrated bioequivalence of SB17, EU-UST, and US-UST in terms of PK. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also comparable between all groups.

Introduction: Ustekinumab use in ulcerative colitis had shown low adverse event and high persistence rates to 3 years via the UNIFI long-term extension study. Outcomes beyond 3 years have not been previously described. We describe the safety signals of the entire UNIFI Australian population beyond 3 years., Methods: This retrospective multicenter observational cohort study recruited from all Australian UNIFI centers. The primary outcome was safety via adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the clinical relapse rate on ustekinumab, and the need to switch from ustekinumab to an alternate agent., Results: There were 14 patients [11 male, mean age 47 (±14) years], with a median diagnosis of 10.8 (±4.5) years prior to UNIFI enrollment. Median follow-up was 298 weeks (5.7 years) (Interquartile range (IQR): 220-311 weeks). Within the long-term extension, there were three serious adverse events and one minor event. 42.9% (6/14) patients had clinical relapses, of which clinical remission was recaptured in 83.3% (5/6). 85.7% (12/14) persisted on ustekinumab in the long-term, with 7.1% (1/14) electively ceasing ustekinumab and 7.1% (1/14) changed from ustekinumab due to clinical relapse., Conclusion: For moderate-to-severe UC in Australia, ustekinumab maintained efficacy beyond 3 years with a high persistence rate and no new safety signals., Trial Registration: The trial is registered at ANZCTR (identifier: ACTRN12622001332718).

Introduction: The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD., Area Covered: This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs)., Expert Opinion: RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest

Background: Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking., Methods: A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed., Results: Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values., Conclusion: A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.

Background: Pregnancy outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with quiescent disease are similar to those in the general population. Data from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry have demonstrated the safety of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents and thiopurines in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to provide information from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry on maternal and fetal outcomes in patients exposed to the newer biologics ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ)., Methods: In this multicenter prospective observational study, we included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Questionnaires were administered to women at study intake, each subsequent trimester, delivery, and 4, 9, and 12 months after birth. Bivariate analyses were used to determine the independent effects of specific drug classes on outcomes. The exposure cohorts were VDZ, UST, anti-TNF, immunomodulators, and combination with anti-TNF and immunomodulators. All were compared with no exposure and with biologics/immunomodulators., Results: There were 1,669 completed pregnancies with 1,610 live births. The maternal mean age was 32.1 (SD 4.6) years at delivery with 66 VDZ exposed and 47 UST exposed. Women on UST were more likely to have Crohn's disease. There was no increased risk of spontaneous abortion, small for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit stay, congenital malformations, or intrauterine growth restriction with in utero VDZ or UST exposure. The rate of preterm birth was lower (0.0%) for the UST-exposed cohort when compared with other cohorts including VDZ (13.8%), anti-TNF (8.2%), combination therapy (14.2%), immunomodulators (12.3%), and unexposed (9.7%) ( P = 0.03). Rates of serious infections at birth, 4 months, and within the first 12 months of life were comparable among all cohorts. Nonserious infections were lower at 12 months in UST-exposed pregnancies. There was no increased risk signal for placental complications in the VDZ cohort. UST infant concentrations at birth were increased whereas VDZ concentrations were overall decreased compared with maternal serum drug concentration., Discussion: This analysis of UST and VDZ exposure during pregnancy suggests no increase in complications compared with TNF, immunomodulators, and combination TNF/immunomodulators. No signal was found for increased placental events with either therapy. Continuation of UST and VDZ throughout pregnancy is recommended., (Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background and Aims: Ongoing efforts to break the therapeutic ceiling in inflammatory bowel disease include combination therapy approaches. Dual-targeted therapy (DTT) has been reported in case reports and small case series. This report describes our experience with ustekinumab (UST) and upadacitinib (UPA) as DTT in patients with Crohn's disease (CD)., Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, we reviewed medical records of patients with CD treated with combined UST and UPA between April 2021 and July 2022. Clinical remission was defined as Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) ≤ 4, and clinical response was defined as decrease in HBI ≥ 3 or physician's assessment of clinical response., Results: We identified 10 CD patients treated with UST/UPA, with median follow-up period of 10 months (interquartile range (IQR) 7.3-12). Median age was 35.5 years (IQR 28.3-43.8) and median number of prior biologic treatment exposures was 4 (IQR 4-5). Indications for UST/UPA were active CD (n = 6), extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) (n = 2), and both active CD and EIM (n = 2). Five of six patients with active CD achieved clinical remission with UST/UPA. Two patients with active EIM (joint pain) achieved resolution of their symptoms. One patient exhibited improvement in both conditions. Three patients developed mild respiratory symptoms and one experienced bowel obstruction. Two patients developed nausea resulting in de-escalation of treatment interval or discontinuation altogether., Conclusion: Based on our case series, combination therapy with UST and UPA may be effective and appears safe in refractory Crohn's disease and for patients with co-existing extraintestinal manifestations., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Biological therapies have established efficacy in psoriasis vulgaris. However, palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) has proven difficult to treat, and data on drug survival in these patients remain scarce., Objective: To investigate drug survival of biological treatments in a nationwide cohort of patients with PPP., Methods: We included all patients treated for PPP with a biologic from a prospective Danish nationwide registry between 2007 and 2019. Descriptive statistics were reported. Drug survival was calculated for all patients and specified for the most frequently used biologics. Drug survival was reported as median time to discontinuation. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to visualize drug survival. Trajectories of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were plotted by interpolating between the different visits with a dermatologist for each treatment course., Results: We identified 85 individual patients who received biological therapy for PPP across 194 treatment courses during follow-up. Of the included treatment courses, 151 (77.8%) were discontinued. The most frequent cause of discontinuation was ineffective response to treatment (54.3%), while 18.5% of courses were discontinued due to adverse events. The median drug survival across all therapies for PPP was 9.3 (Inter quartile range (IQR), 3.9-25.6) months. Ustekinumab demonstrated the longest median time to discontinuation of 14.6 (IQR, 9.1-51.8) months. The proportion of bio-naive patients in treatment at 12 months were according to drug 47.9% for adalimumab, 64.3% for ustekinumab and 40.0% for secukinumab. For bio-experienced, it was 58.2% adalimumab, 54.5% for ustekinumab and 51.4% for secukinumab., Conclusions: The treatment of PPP poses significant challenges, with limited drug survival observed across all therapies regardless of prior experience with biologics. Ustekinumab demonstrated the longest median drug survival. Notably, patients discontinuing therapy due to inefficacy exhibited higher DLQI scores, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment selection and timely consideration of therapy changes when inefficacy is established., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Ustekinumab (UST), a biologic agent targeting interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, is widely used in the management of psoriasis and Crohn's disease. Despite its efficacy, there have been instances of paradoxical psoriasis induction or exacerbation in some patients during UST therapy. This paper offers a comprehensive review of reported cases of UST-induced paradoxical psoriasis, including a case from our clinic. We focus on a 39-year-old female patient with a history of long-standing Crohn's disease who developed a psoriasiform rash, as confirmed by biopsy, while undergoing UST treatment. The patient's clinical journey, from initial diagnosis through the complexities of treatment adjustments due to various complications including drug-induced lupus and the subsequent onset of psoriatic manifestations, provides insight into the challenges encountered in the clinical management of such cases. This review emphasizes the necessity for clinicians to recognize the possibility of paradoxical psoriasis in patients receiving UST treatment and calls for further research to better understand this phenomenon and devise effective management strategies.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) was approved in China for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) in 2020. The prevalence rates of tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are high in China, and no guideline clearly states that tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis or prophylactic anti-HBV therapy should be prescribed before UST administration. This study aimed to assess the risk of tuberculosis and HBV reactivation in CD patients with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and previous HBV infection receiving UST., Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was carried out at 68 hospitals in China to assess 721 adult CD cases administered UST between May 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. CD and concurrent LTBI or HBV carrier were included. Hepatitis B serology, T-SPOT.TB, and tuberculin skin tests were performed at baseline. The primary outcome was tuberculosis or HBV reactivation., Results: Patients with CD-concomitant LTBI or who were HBV carriers receiving UST therapy were retrospectively enrolled from 15 hospitals in China. A total of 53 CD with LTBI patients and 17 CD with HBV carrier patients receiving UST were included. Treatment and follow-up durations were 50 ± 20 weeks and 50 ± 15 weeks in the LTBI and HBV carrier groups, respectively. A total of 25 CD patients with LTBI underwent chemoprophylaxis and 28 did not. A total of 11 HBV carriers had antiviral prophylaxis and 6 did not. No patient experienced tuberculosis or HBV reactivation or liver dysfunction during follow-up., Conclusions: UST was safe for treatment of CD because no patient developed tuberculosis, persistent hepatitis, or acute liver failure during therapy, whether with a prophylactic regimen or not, based on our sample size and limited follow-up time., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend ustekinumab as a first-line biological treatment option for moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease (CD). However, there is limited real-world effectiveness and safety data in bio-naïve patients., Aims: To assess ustekinumab effectiveness and safety in bio-naïve CD patients., Methods: Medical charts were reviewed retrospectively at seven Canadian centers. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission at Month 6 following ustekinumab initiation. Secondary outcomes included clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic response, and remission at Months 4, 6 and 12. Ustekinumab safety was assessed over the one-year follow-up period., Results: 158 charts were reviewed. Clinical remission was achieved by 50.0% (36/72), 67.7% (105/155), and 73.7% (84/114) of patients at Months 4, 6, and 12, respectively. At these study timepoints, biochemical remission was observed in 65.2% (43/66), 71.6% (63/88), and 73.9% (68/92) of patients. At Months 6 and 12, endoscopic remission was observed in 40.5% (15/37) and 56.3% (27/48) of patients, respectively. Most participants (93.5%; 145/155) persisted on ustekinumab through Month 12. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported., Conclusion: In this real-world study, ustekinumab presents as an effective first-line biologic for induction and maintenance of remission among bio-naïve Canadian patients with moderately-to-severely active CD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest This study was funded by Janssen Inc. The sponsor was involved in the design, interpretation, and reporting of study results. TB acted as a speaker or advisor for AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts Inc.), Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Pentax, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, Viatris. NN has received honoraria from Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Merck, Sandoz, Novartis, and Ferring. CM has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Amgen, AVIR Pharma Inc, BioJAMP, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, McKesson, Mylan, Takeda, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Roche; speaker's fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AVIR Pharma Inc, Alimentiv, Ferring, Janssen, Takeda, and Pfizer; research support from Ferring, Pfizer. VJ served on advisory boards, consulted or was an investigator for AbbVie, Alimentiv Inc. (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.), Amgen, Applied Strategic, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, BioJamp. Celgene/BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Flagship Pioneering, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Organon (Merck), Landos BioPharma, Mylan, Pandion, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Sandoz, Second Genome, Takeda, Teva, Topivert, Ventyx Biosciences, and Vividion Therapeutics. VJ acted as a speaker for AbbVie, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda and is an employee of Western University. KK was full time employees of Janssen Inc. at the time of the study. TI is a full-time employee of Janssen Inc. ME is a full-time employee of IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc. (IQVIA). Janssen Inc. contracted with IQVIA to manage the study., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an interleukin-12/interleukin-23 receptor antagonist recently approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) but with limited real-world data. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of UST in patients with UC in a real-world setting., Research Design and Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. The primary endpoints were the clinical remission rate (partial Mayo score, PMS, ≤1) and the safety of UST. Other endpoints were corticosteroid-free remission (CSFR) rate, clinical response rate (PMS reduction of at least 2 points), and fecal calprotectin (FC) reduction at week 24., Results: We included 256 consecutive patients with UC (M/F 139/117, median age 52). The clinical remission and clinical response rates at eight weeks were 18.7% (44/235) and 53.2% (125/235), respectively, and 27.6% (42/152) and 61.8% (94/152) at 24 weeks, respectively. At 24 weeks, CSFR was 20.3% (31/152), and FC significantly dropped at week 12 ( p  = 0.0004) and 24 ( p  = 0.038). At eight weeks, patients naïve or with one previous biologic treatment showed higher remission ( p  = 0.002) and clinical >response rates ( p  = 0.018) than patients previously treated with ≥ 2. Adverse events occurred in six patients (2.3%), whereas four patients (1.6%) underwent colectomy., Conclusion: This real-world study shows that UST effectively and safely treats patients with UC.

Background & Aims: Endoscopic assessment of ulcerative colitis (UC) typically reports only the maximum severity observed. Computer vision methods may better quantify mucosal injury detail, which varies among patients., Methods: Endoscopic video from the UNIFI clinical trial (A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis) comparing ustekinumab and placebo for UC were processed in a computer vision analysis that spatially mapped Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) to generate the Cumulative Disease Score (CDS). CDS was compared with the MES for differentiating ustekinumab vs placebo treatment response and agreement with symptomatic remission at week 44. Statistical power, effect, and estimated sample sizes for detecting endoscopic differences between treatments were calculated using both CDS and MES measures. Endoscopic video from a separate phase 2 clinical trial replication cohort was performed for validation of CDS performance., Results: Among 748 induction and 348 maintenance patients, CDS was lower in ustekinumab vs placebo users at week 8 (141.9 vs 184.3; P < .0001) and week 44 (78.2 vs 151.5; P < .0001). CDS was correlated with the MES (P < .0001) and all clinical components of the partial Mayo score (P < .0001). Stratification by pretreatment CDS revealed ustekinumab was more effective than placebo (P < .0001) with increasing effect in severe vs mild disease (-85.0 vs -55.4; P < .0001). Compared with the MES, CDS was more sensitive to change, requiring 50% fewer participants to demonstrate endoscopic differences between ustekinumab and placebo (Hedges' g = 0.743 vs 0.460). CDS performance in the JAK-UC replication cohort was similar to UNIFI., Conclusions: As an automated and quantitative measure of global endoscopic disease severity, the CDS offers artificial intelligence enhancement of traditional MES capability to better evaluate UC in clinical trials and potentially practice., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: CT-P43 is a candidate ustekinumab biosimilar in clinical development., Objectives: This paper aims to demonstrate equivalent efficacy of CT-P43 to originator ustekinumab in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: This double-blind, phase III trial randomised patients (1:1) to receive subcutaneous CT-P43 or originator ustekinumab (45/90 mg for patients with baseline body weight ≤ 100 kg/> 100 kg) at week 0 and week 4 in Treatment Period I. Prior to week 16 dosing in Treatment Period II, patients receiving originator ustekinumab were re-randomised (1:1) to continue originator ustekinumab or switch to CT-P43; patients initially randomised to CT-P43 continued receiving CT-P43 (at weeks 16, 28 and 40). The primary endpoint of the trial was mean per cent improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12. Equivalence was concluded if confidence intervals (CIs) for the estimate of treatment difference were within pre-defined equivalence margins: ± 10% [90% CI; modified intent-to-treat set; Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approach] or ± 15% [95% CI; full analysis set for patients only receiving 45 mg doses in Treatment Period I; European Medicines Agency (EMA) approach]. Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity endpoints were evaluated through week 52. Results to week 28 are reported here., Results: In Treatment Period I, 509 patients were randomised (CT-P43: N = 256; originator ustekinumab: N = 253). The mean per cent improvement in PASI score at week12 was 77.93% and 75.89% for CT-P43 and originator ustekinumab, respectively (FDA approach); per the EMA approach, corresponding values were 78.26% and 77.33%. Estimated treatment differences were 2.05 (90% CI -0.23, 4.32) and 0.94 (95% CI -2.29, 4.16); equivalence was achieved for both sets of assumptions. Further efficacy parameters and pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity outcomes were comparable between treatment groups, including after switching from originator ustekinumab to CT-P43., Conclusions: CT-P43 demonstrated equivalent efficacy to originator ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with comparable pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity profiles., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04673786; date of registration: 17 December, 2020., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: Real-world assessments of efficacy and safety of advanced therapies used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are limited. We aimed to report safety, efficacy and treatment persistence of new molecules (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab) in a retrospective multicentric national Romanian analysis., Methods: We conducted a nationwide, retrospective observational multicentric study. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic and paper files. Patients who started on one of the five investigated molecules during December 2019-December 2021 were included. The main outcome measures were clinical remission, endoscopic healing, persistence on treatment and safety data., Results: A total of 678 adult patients from 24 Romanian IBD centers with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease were included. Participants had previously failure to one (268, 39.5%), two (108, 15%) or more treatment lines and only 38% (259) were biologic naïve. In the 24 months study period, most patients were started on vedolizumab (192, 28%), followed by adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib. In biologic-naïve patients, most physicians (72%) preferred anti-TNF treatment as first line biologic (93 patients started on infliximab, 92 on adalimumab), followed by vedolizumab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib. During follow-up, 71% (470, p=0.05) of patients achieved clinical remission and 36% (134, p=0.03) achieved mucosal healing. The 6 months milestone for persistence was reached in 78% (530) of cases. Almost half of patients (47%, 316 patients) persisted on their current treatment for over 12 months. Overall, an adverse reaction was reported for 67 (10.4%) patients, with no lethal events., Conclusions: Population of biologic-experienced IBD patients in Romania is increasing and is becoming more difficult to achieve long-term disease control. Discontinuation rates for advanced therapies are high.

Background: The influence of sex on treatment outcomes during interleukin-12/23 therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has not been explored., Objective: To conduct exploratory post hoc analyses of sex-stratified data from the MUST trial, an investigator-initiated, multicentre, phase 3b study in which patients with active PsA initiating treatment with open-label ustekinumab were randomised to treatment with placebo or methotrexate (MTX)., Methods: We evaluated baseline characteristics, key treatment outcomes and adverse events stratified by sex, with a focus on outcomes that did not include erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as a component due to the known elevation of ESR in females., Results: A total of 166 patients were treated with ustekinumab+MTX (37 female, 50 male) or ustekinumab+placebo (32 female, 47 male). At baseline, females had a significantly longer time since PsA diagnosis and greater impairment in physical function, but similar joint counts. At week 24, both females and males showed marked improvements to ustekinumab with or without MTX. Females generally had numerically reduced treatment responses compared with males, although differences did not achieve statistical significance. MTX did not show an overall effect on treatment outcomes, but was associated with faster enthesitis responses in males only. Adverse events were generally comparable, but females in the ustekinumab+MTX group had higher levels of gastrointestinal disorders., Conclusion: Females and males with PsA had differences in baseline characteristics, treatment responses and adverse events during therapy. A better understanding of sex-based differences in PsA may help optimise treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MK received consulting fees or honoraria from Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis and UCB and received travel support from UCB. UK received grant and research support and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biocad, Biogen, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Gilead, Grünenthal, GSK, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, onkowissen.de, Pfizer, Roche, UCB and Viatris and participated on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for the COPAGO trial, conducted by the German Ministry of Health. GRB received fees or honoraria for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB, meeting or travel support from Abbvie and Lilly and is the editor-in-chief of RMD Open. DMK received honoraria for serving as a speaker for Sanofi-Aventis. SF received scientific grants from Novartis, honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Galapagos, Novartis, NovoNordisc and UCB, and travel or meeting support from Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, SOBI and UCB. RB received honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker and/or consultant from Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, GSK, Galapagos, Novartis, Roche and Vifor and meeting or travel support from Chugai and Galapagos. MS received research support from Charité. FB received research support for this study from Janssen Cilag, consulting fees or honoraria from Abbvie, Acelyrin, Amgen, Janssen Cilag, Lily, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and meeting or travel support from Abbvie and UCB. ACF, TR, HK and JB have no competing interests to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: ustekinumab has proven effective in Crohn's disease (CD). However, some patients will partially respond or lose response over time. Data supporting the effectiveness of dose escalation in this scenario is scarce., Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab dose escalation in CD., Methods: patients with active CD (Harvey-Bradshaw ≥ 5) who had received intravenous (IV) induction and at least a subcutaneous (SC) dose were included in this retrospective observational study. Ustekinumab dose was escalated, either via shortening of the interval to six or four weeks or IV reinduction plus shortening to every four weeks., Results: ninety-one patients were included, and ustekinumab dose was escalated after a median of 35 weeks of treatment. At week 16 after intensification, steroid-free clinical response and remission were observed in 62.6 % and 25.3 % of patients, respectively. Systemic corticosteroids were discontinued in 46.7 % of patients who were on corticosteroids at baseline. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 78 % of patients; at the last visit, 66.2 % and 43.7 % were in steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively. After a median follow-up of 64 weeks, 81 % of patients were still treated with ustekinumab. Adverse events were reported in 4.3 % of patients; these were all mild and did not lead to hospitalization or discontinuation of treatment. Five patients (5.5 %) underwent surgical resection, with no immediate postsurgical complications., Conclusion: ustekinumab dose escalation was effective in recapturing response in over half of the patients. These findings suggest that dose escalation should be considered in patients who experience loss or partial response to the standard maintenance.

Rationale: Crohn disease (CD) and pregnancy often impact each other, which poses challenges for women with CD to successfully give birth to a healthy baby. The latest guideline recommends that patients with active inflammatory bowel disease delay pregnancy to induce remission and optimize disease control. Research data has showed that the incidence of infection and severe infection in patients treated with ustekinumab (UST) did not increase compared to those treated with a placebo., Patient Concerns: This report describes the entire process of a pregnant woman with CD who has undergone ileostomy and long-term enteral nutrition and requires biological agents to control the disease, from conception to delivery. This case was pregnant during CD period and regularly treated with UST to the third trimester, with the onset of sepsis and septic shock at 38 weeks gestation., Diagnoses: The patient was pathologically diagnosed with CD 16 years ago and admitted to our department at 38 weeks gestation., Interventions: After admission to our department, fetal heart monitoring indicated fetal distress, so we immediately terminated the pregnancy by cesarean section. After the diagnosis of septic shock, the patient was transferred to intensive care unit for active anti-infection and symptomatic supportive treatment., Outcomes: The mother only experienced an infection in the third trimester, and cured by active treatment. The newborn was delivered at full term and confirmed to be low birth weight., Lessons: Her experience suggests that although pregnant during Crohn active period, a good outcome can be achieved through positively controlling with medication and closely monitoring it. The use of UST during pregnancy appears to be safe for both the mother and fetus but may be associated with severe infections., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: This work aimed to investigate the long-term clinical experience with ustekinumab in cases with psoriasis., Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort research group consisted of cases who presented to the dermatology outpatient clinics between January 2015 and January 2021, diagnosed with psoriasis, and were treated with ustekinumab. Data including gender, age, weight, disease duration, naïve and non-naïve status, psoriasis type, duration of medication, comorbidities, psoriasis area and severity index scores, the causes of treatment discontinuation, and previous treatments were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed., Results: 160 cases with psoriasis were treated with ustekinumab during the research period. Twenty-four patients were excluded. Among 136 cases, 84 (61.8%) were male and 52 (38.2%) were female. We determined 80.55% of the non-naïve cases responded to ustekinumab., Conclusion: Ustekinumab can be a suitable treatment option for non-naïve and resistant patients. Our data suggest the positive effect persists in cases with favorable responses to the first or second dose of ustekinumab. Also, we determined male cases gave more rapid and more robust responses than female cases, and patients were more willing about continuing the treatment.

BioFactura has developed a proposed biosimilar candidate (BFI-751) to ustekinumab reference product. Results are reported for the first-in-human trial designed to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety, and immunogenicity of BFI-751 and ustekinumab reference products from the European Union and United States as well as similarity of the EU and US reference products. This was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, 3-parallel-group study (trial ID: NCT04843631). Healthy subjects were randomized to receive a single subcutaneous dose of 45 mg of BFI-751, EU ustekinumab, or US ustekinumab. The pharmacokinetic parameters were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum concentration. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity data were also reported. Pairwise comparisons among the 3 treatments all met the standard bioequivalence criteria that the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratios of AUC from time zero to infinity, AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum concentration are completely within the acceptance interval of 80%-125%. There were no marked differences in the safety and tolerability profiles for subjects receiving BFI-751 as compared to EU or US ustekinumab. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate for all treatment groups., (© 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Studies report favorable efficacy and safety profiles of ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in Crohn's disease (CD), but effectiveness and safety data in elderly patients with CD is lacking. We retrospectively analyzed 78 elderly patients (39 each UST and VDZ) and found that patients on UST and VDZ experienced similar rates of clinical response, remission and mucosal healing despite high proportion of prior biologic exposure. Both UST and VDZ appear to be effective and safe in this at-risk CD population. Further large studies are needed to validate our findings., (© 2023. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.)

ABP 654 is a proposed biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product (RP) which works through antagonism of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23. Ustekinumab RP is used for the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions, including some forms of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. A randomized, double-blinded, single-dose, 3-arm, parallel-group study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of ABP 654 with ustekinumab RP sourced from the United States (US) and the European Union (EU); the PK similarity of ustekinumab US versus ustekinumab EU; and the comparative safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of all 3 products. A total of 238 healthy subjects were randomized 1:1:1 and stratified by gender and ethnicity (Japanese versus non-Japanese) to receive a single 90 mg subcutaneous injection of ABP 654 or ustekinumab US or ustekinumab EU. PK similarity was established based on 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the primary endpoints of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC inf ) and maximum observed serum concentration (C max ) being contained within the prespecified margin of 0.8-1.25. No clinically meaningful differences in immunogenicity were found among the 3 products. Adverse events were similar between treatment groups and consistent with the safety profile of ustekinumab RP. Results indicate that ABP 654, ustekinumab US and ustekinumab EU share similar PK and safety profiles., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background & Aims: We compared the safety and effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists vs vedolizumab vs ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in a multicenter cohort (CA-IBD)., Methods: We created an electronic health record-based cohort of adult patients with CD who were initiating a new biologic agent (TNF-α antagonists, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) from 5 health systems in California between 2010 and 2017. We compared the risk of serious infections (safety) and all-cause hospitalization and inflammatory bowel disease-related surgery (effectiveness) between different biologic classes using propensity score (PS) matching., Results: As compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 1030), 2:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 515) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64), without any difference in the risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.21) or surgery (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.70). Compared with vedolizumab (n = 221), 1:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.60), without significant differences in risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.07) or surgery (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.54-3.72). Compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 442), 2:1 PS-matched, vedolizumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) had a similar risk of serious infections (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.84-2.78), hospitalization (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98-1.77), and surgery (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27-1.47). High comorbidity burden, concomitant opiate use, and prior hospitalization were associated with serious infections and hospitalization in biologic-treated patients with CD., Conclusion: In a multicenter cohort of biologic-treated patients with CD, ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections compared with TNF-α antagonists and vedolizumab, without any differences in risk of hospitalization or surgery. The risk of serious infections was similar for TNF-α antagonists vs vedolizumab., (Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Primary and secondary non-response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy is common in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), yet limited research has compared the effectiveness of subsequent biological therapy., Objective: We sought to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in anti-TNF-experienced patients with CD, focusing on patient-prioritized patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Methods: We conducted a prospective, internet-based cohort study nested within IBD Partners. We identified anti-TNF-experienced patients initiating with CD vedolizumab or ustekinumab and analyzed PROs reported approximately 6 months later (minimum 4 months, maximum 10 months). Co-primary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of Fatigue and Pain Interference. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported short Crohn's disease activity index (sCDAI), treatment persistence, and corticosteroid use. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to control for a number of potential confounders and incorporated into linear and logistic regression models for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively., Results: Overall, 141 vedolizumab and 219 ustekinumab initiators were included in our analysis. After adjustment, we found no differences between treatment groups in our primary outcomes of Pain Interference or Fatigue or the secondary outcome of sCDAI. However, vedolizumab was associated with lower treatment persistence (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) and higher corticosteroid use at follow-up assessment (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6)., Discussion: Among anti-TNF experienced patients with CD, Pain Interference or Fatigue was not significantly different 4-10 months after starting ustekinumab or vedolizumab. However, reduced steroid use and increased persistence suggest superiority of ustekinumab for non-PRO outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) primarily affects the respiratory system but extrapulmonary manifestations, including the skin, have been well documented. However, transcriptomic profiles of skin lesions have not been performed thus far. Here, we present a single-cell RNA sequencing analysis in a patient with COVID-19 infection with a maculopapular skin rash while on treatment with the interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 blocker ustekinumab for his underlying psoriasis. Results were compared with healthy controls and untreated psoriasis lesions. We found the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral entry receptors ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in keratinocytes of the patient with COVID-19, while ACE2 expression was low to undetectable in psoriasis lesions and healthy skin. Among all cell types, ACE2+ keratinocyte clusters showed the highest levels of transcriptomic dysregulation in COVID-19, expressing type 1-associated immune markers such as CXCL9 and CXCL10. In line with a generally type 1-skewed immune microenvironment, cytotoxic lymphocytes showed increased expression of the IFNG gene and other T-cell effector genes, while type 2, type 17, or type 22 T-cell activation was largely absent. Conversely, downregulation of several anti-inflammatory mediators was observed. This first transcriptomic description of a COVID-19-associated rash identifies ACE2+ keratinocytes displaying profound transcriptional changes, and inflammatory immune cells that might help to improve the understanding of SARS-CoV-2-associated skin conditions., (© 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Background: There is limited real-world data on comparative effectiveness of different biologic or small molecule agents as second-line therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior exposure to a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional database to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior exposure to a TNFi. Failure of medical therapy was defined as a composite outcome of intravenous steroids or colectomy within 2 years. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for demographics, disease extent, mean haemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin and calprotectin, prior IBD medications and steroid use between cohorts., Results: Among 2141 patients with UC and prior exposure to TNFi, 348 (16.2%), 716 (33.4%) and 1077 (50.3%) were switched to tofacitinib, ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively. After propensity-score matching, there was no difference in the composite outcome (aOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55-1.07) but higher risk of colectomy (aOR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.31-5.50) in the tofacitinib cohort than the vedolizumab cohort. There was no difference in the risk of composite outcome (aOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.89-1.86) but higher risk of colectomy (aOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.24-5.58) in the tofacitinib cohort than the ustekinumab cohort. The vedolizumab cohort had a higher risk of composite outcome (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.29-2.16) than the ustekinumab cohort., Conclusion: Ustekinumab might be the preferred second-line therapy over tofacitinib and vedolizumab in patients with UC that were previously exposed to a TNFi., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: There are little data on positioning biologics in Crohn's disease (CD)., Aims: We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab vs tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) agents after first-line treatment with anti-TNF in CD., Methods: We used Swedish nationwide registers to identify patients with CD, exposed to anti-TNF who initiated second-line biologic treatment with ustekinumab or second-line anti-TNF therapy. Nearest neighbour 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the groups. The primary outcome was 3-year drug survival used as a proxy for effectiveness. Secondary outcomes included drug survival without hospital admission, CD-related surgery, antibiotics, hospitalization due to infection and exposure to corticosteroids., Results: Some 312 patients remained after PSM. Drug survival at 3 years was 35% (95% CI 26-44%) in ustekinumab compared to 36% (95% CI 28-44%) in anti-TNF-treated patients (p = 0.72). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in 3-year survival without hospital admission (72% vs 70%, p = 0.99), surgery (87% vs 92%, p = 0.17), hospital admission due to infection (92% vs 92%, p = 0.31) or prescription of antibiotics (49% vs 50%, p = 0.56). The proportion of patients continuing second-line biologic therapy did not differ by reason for ending first-line anti-TNF (lack of response vs intolerance) or by type of first-line anti-TNF (adalimumab vs infliximab)., Conclusion: Based on data from Swedish routine care, no clinically relevant differences in effectiveness or safety of second-line ustekinumab vs anti-TNF treatment were observed in patients with CD with prior exposure to anti-TNF., (© 2023. The Author(s).)