Search

Background: Early intervention programmes (EIPs) in psychosis have gained attention as specialised interventions to improve health-related and societal impacts for people with psychotic disorders. Previous studies have presented evidence in favour of EIPs over the first year of intervention, despite none considering the critical period before psychosis onset (5 years)., Aims: To compare the associated costs of the First Episode Psychosis Intervention Program (CRUPEP) and treatment as usual (TAU) in a real-world cohort in a non-specialised psychiatric community setting., Method: Direct and indirect mental health-related costs were calculated over 1 year and up to 7 years. Healthcare and societal costs were calculated from economic data related to the consumption of all healthcare resources, including emergency department attendances, hospital admissions, psychotropic medication prescriptions and societal costs., Results: From a healthcare perspective, the intervention (CRUPEP) group initially showed a marginally higher cost per patient than the TAU group (€7621 TAU group v. €11 904 CRUPEP group) over the first year of follow-up. However, this difference was reversed between the groups on considering the entire follow-up, with the TAU group showing considerably higher associated costs per patient (€77 026 TAU v. €25 247 CRUPEP)., Conclusions: The EIP (CRUPEP) showed clinical benefits and minimised the direct and indirect health-related costs of the management of psychosis. Although the CRUPEP intervention initially reported increased costs over 1 year, TAU surpassed the global costs over the entire follow-up.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and economic costs of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (5 fr × 5 Gy), compared with other conventional 3D radiotherapy schemes such as "5 × 4 Gy" and "10 × 3 Gy"., Materials and Methods: The data about the direct costs for the public health system was obtained from the Economic Information "Management per Patient" System available at the Integrated Health Organization Ezkerraldea Enkarterri Cruces. It is a model of real costs per patient which uses a bottom-up methodology which connects all sources of information generated in clinical practice, integrating healthcare information with economic information. This system presents the real cost per individualized patient, and shows the traceability of all clinical care. The costs of "typical patients" requiring hospital admission were identified for each of the three radiotherapy schemes based on the clinical activity and the material and human resources that were used., Results: The 5 × 5 Gy scheme has a cost of EUR 4,801.48, which is 1.64% higher (EUR 77) than the "5 × 4 Gy" scheme (EUR 4,724.05). The "10 × 3 Gy" scheme has a cost of EUR 8,394.61, which is 74.8% higher (EUR 3,593) than the "5 × 5 Gy" scheme. The main cost factor in the "10 × 3 Gy" scheme is hospitalization, since patients are at hospital for 2 weeks compared with 1 week in the "5 × 5 Gy" scheme., Conclusions: The cost per patient of the VMAT "5 × 5 Gy" radiotherapy scheme is notably lower than that of the "10 × 3 Gy" scheme (conventional 3D radiotherapy), with the advantage of being administered in half the time. In relation to the scheme with 5 Gy × 4 sessions, the cost is similar to that of the "5 × 5 Gy" scheme., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Authors declare no competing interest., (© 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.)