Search

Michael Z Liao,1 Johannes Kast,1 Marloes Berkhout,2 Hans Prenen,3 Sandeep Dutta,4 Vijay V Upreti1 1Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Amgen B.V., Breda, the Netherlands; 3Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium; 4Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USACorrespondence: Vijay V UpretiClinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen, 1120 Veterans Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USAEmail vupreti@amgen.com Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the letter by Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues. We wish to thank Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues for their interest in our recent publication by Liao et al1 and their comments about the optimal dosing regimen for panitumumab. The body weight-based dosing, 6 mg/kg once every two-week (Q2W) regimen, for panitumumab as an optimal dosing regimen is fully supported by clinical study data and pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations.2 View the original paper by Liao and colleagues This is in response to the Letter to the Editor

Vijay V Upreti,1 Yan Song,1 Jessie Wang,2 Wonkyung Byon,3 Rebecca A Boyd,3 Janice M Pursley,4 Frank LaCreta,1 Charles E Frost1 1Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Discovery Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, 2Exploratory Development Global Biometric Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 3Primary Care Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer, Groton, CT, 4Analytical and Bioanalytical Department, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA Background: Apixaban is an oral, selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for thromboprophylaxis after orthopedic surgery and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, and under development for treatment of venous thromboembolism. This study investigated the effect of a gastric acid suppressant, famotidine (a histamine H2-receptor antagonist), on the pharmacokinetics of apixaban in healthy subjects. Methods: This two-period, two-treatment crossover study randomized 18 healthy subjects to receive a single oral dose of apixaban 10 mg with and without a single oral dose of famotidine 40 mg administered 3 hours before dosing with apixaban. Plasma apixaban concentrations were measured up to 60 hours post-dose and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Results: Famotidine did not affect maximum apixaban plasma concentration (Cmax) or area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinite time (AUC∞). Point estimates for ratios of geometric means with and without famotidine were close to unity for Cmax (0.978) and AUC∞ (1.007), and 90% confidence intervals were entirely contained within the 80%–125% no-effect interval. Administration of apixaban alone and with famotidine was well tolerated. Conclusion: Famotidine does not affect the pharmacokinetics of apixaban, consistent with the physicochemical properties of apixaban (lack of an ionizable group and pH-independent solubility). Apixaban pharmacokinetics would not be affected by an increase in gastrointestinal pH due to underlying conditions (eg, achlorhydria), or by gastrointestinal pH-mediated effects of other histamine H2-receptor antagonists, antacids, or proton pump inhibitors. Given that famotidine is also an inhibitor of the human organic cation transporter (hOCT), these results indicate that apixaban pharmacokinetics are not influenced by hOCT uptake transporter inhibitors. Overall, these results support that apixaban can be administered without regard to coadministration of gastric acid modifiers. Keywords: apixaban, factor Xa inhibitor, famotidine, H2-receptor antagonists, hOCT inhibitor, drug–drug interaction

The purpose of this bridging phase I study was to characterize the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects of a capsule formulation of DRF-1042, a novel camptothecin analog, in refractory solid tumor patients. DRF-1042 was given daily for 5 consecutive days for 2 weeks, repeated every 3 weeks at 81 mg/m(2). Adverse events were monitored following NCI-CTC. Blood samples were processed for bioanalysis using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. The pharmacokinetics of lactone and total (lactone + carboxylate) forms was determined on days 1 and 12 using a noncompartmental pharmacokinetic method. Pharmacokinetic data with the capsule formulation were compared with previously reported pharmacokinetic parameters with a suspension formulation. Efficacy was evaluated by applying World Health Organization criteria. Six patients received 10 courses of therapy. Thrombocytopenia and diarrhea were dose-limiting toxicities. The upper limit of the area under the curve of DRF-1042 (lactone and total) with the capsule formulation was higher than a suspension formulation at a similar dose on day 1 (lactone: capsule = 8.53 microMxh, suspension = 5.33 microMxh; total: capsule = 393 microMxh, suspension = 176 microMxh) and day 12 (lactone: capsule = 22.1 microMxh, suspension = 6.1 microMxh; total: capsule = 1302 microMxh, suspension = 309 microMxh). The upper limit of the area under the curve of DRF-1042 (lactone and total) was higher under fed conditions (lactone = 15.9 microMxh, total = 605 microMxh) relative to fasted conditions (lactone = 8.53 microMxh, total = 393 microMxh) on day 1. One patient experienced stable disease. The toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the capsule correlated well with the suspension. The recommended phase II dose is 81 mg/m(2). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to characterize the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects of DRF-1042, a novel camptothecin analog, in refractory solid tumor patients. DRF-1042 was given for 5 consecutive days for 2 weeks, repeated every 3 weeks at 1.5 to 270 mg/m(2). Adverse events were monitored following NCI-CTC. Pharmacokinetics of lactone and total forms were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and noncompartmental methods. Efficacy was evaluated applying World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The 1st course was used to determine DLT and MTD. Twenty-five patients received 73 courses of therapy. Myelosuppression and diarrhea were DLTs. MTD was 120 mg/m(2)/day. AUC increased approximately linearly with dose. The t(1/2) for lactone and total forms was 9.9 and 29 hours, respectively. AUCs correlated significantly with nadir leucopenia and grade 4 diarrhea. Two complete responses (CRs) and 2 partial responses (PRs) were observed. In addition, 4 stable diseases were observed. The recommended phase II dose is 80 mg/m(2)/day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Project Optimus initiative from the FDA introduced a new dose optimization and selection paradigm in oncology drug development. The FDA has outlined approaches to dose optimization for single agents, but multiple oncology drugs are being developed for use in combination with other therapies. Dose optimization in the context of combination drug development is complex and requires a case-by-case approach. It necessitates commitment to the totality of available evidence, leveraging all relevant data on mechanism of action, nonclinical and clinical pharmacology, safety, and principles of model-informed drug development. In this article, we outline key considerations for sponsors and investigators pursuing dose optimization with combinatorial regimens. We illustrate important strategies for dose optimization in the combination setting using a range of hypothetical case examples that represent typical drug development scenarios. Close discussions and collaboration with regulators regarding the optimal approaches to these scenarios will continue to be critical.

Bispecific T-cell engagers (Bi-TCEs) have revolutionized the treatment and management of both hematological and solid tumor indications with opportunities to become best-in-class therapeutics for cancer. However, defining the dose and dosing regimen for the first-in-human (FIH) studies of Bi-TCEs can be challenging, as a high starting dose can expose subjects to serious toxicity while a low starting dose based on traditional minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) approach could lead to lengthy dose escalations that exposes seriously ill patients to sub-therapeutic dosing. Leveraging our in-depth and broad clinical development experience across three generations of Bi-TCEs across both liquid and solid tumor indications, we developed an innovative modified MABEL approach for starting dose selection that integrates knowledge based on the target biology, indication, toxicology, in vitro, in vivo pharmacological evaluations, and translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, together with anticipated safety profile. Compared to the traditional MABEL approach in which high effector to target (E:T) cell ratios are typically used, our innovative approach utilized an optimized E:T cell ratio that better reflects the tumor microenvironment. This modified MABEL approach was successfully applied to FIH dose selection for a half-life extended (HLE) Bi-TCE for gastric cancer. This modified MABEL approach enabled a 10-fold higher starting dose that was deemed safe and well tolerated and saved at least two dose-escalation cohorts before reaching the projected efficacious dose. This approach was successfully accepted by global regulatory agencies and can be applied for Bi-TCEs across both hematological and solid tumor indications for accelerating the clinical development for Bi-TCEs., (© 2024 Amgen. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

The landscape of oncology drug development has witnessed remarkable advancements over the last few decades, significantly improving clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with cancer. Project Optimus, introduced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, stands as a groundbreaking endeavor to reform dose selection of oncology drugs, presenting both opportunities and challenges for the field. To address complex dose optimization challenges, an Oncology Dose Optimization IQ Working Group was created to characterize current practices, provide recommendations for improvement, develop a clinical toolkit, and engage Health Authorities. Historically, dose selection for cytotoxic chemotherapeutics has focused on the maximum tolerated dose, a paradigm that is less relevant for targeted therapies and new treatment modalities. A survey conducted by this group gathered insights from member companies regarding industry practices in oncology dose optimization. Given oncology drug development is a complex effort with multidimensional optimization and high failure rates due to lack of clinically relevant efficacy, this Working Group advocates for a case-by-case approach to inform the timing, specific quantitative targets, and strategies for dose optimization, depending on factors such as disease characteristics, patient population, mechanism of action, including associated resistance mechanisms, and therapeutic index. This white paper highlights the evolving nature of oncology dose optimization, the impact of Project Optimus, and the need for a tailored and evidence-based approach to optimize oncology drug dosing regimens effectively., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

A recent industry perspective published in this journal describes the benefits received by drug companies from participation in the MIDD Pilot Program. Along with the primary objectives of supporting good decision-making in drug development, there were substantial savings in time and development costs. Furthermore, many sponsors reported qualitative benefits such as new learnings and clarity on MIDD strategies and methodology that could be applied to other development programs. Based on the success of the Pilot Program, the FDA recently announced the continuation of the MIDD Paired Meeting Program as part of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VII). In this report, we describe the collective experiences of industry participants in the MIDD Program to date, including all aspects of the process from meeting request submission to follow-up actions. The purpose is to provide future participants with information to optimize the value of the MIDD Program., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Approved and emerging siRNA therapeutics are primarily designed for targeted delivery to liver where the therapeutic gene silencing effects occurs. Impairment of hepatic/renal function and its impact on siRNA pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PKs/PDs) are yet to be mechanistically evaluated to describe the unanticipated clinical observations for this novel modality. We developed pathophysiologically relevant models for organ impairment within a physiologically-based PK-PD (PBPK-PD) modeling framework focusing on modality-specific mechanistic factors to evaluate impact on siRNA PKs and PDs. PBPK-PD models for two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved siRNAs inclisiran and vutrisiran were developed as case studies leveraging available tissue-specific data and translated to humans. Key determinants of the clinical PK and PD of N-acetylgalactosamine conjugated siRNAs (GalNAc-siRNAs) with varying sequences were also identified to inform effective clinical translation strategies for emerging GalNAc-siRNA candidates. A 30-70% reduction in hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptors concentrations still allowed for sufficient amount of free cytoplasmic siRNA for RISC-loading to produce PD effects comparable in extent and duration to normal liver function. This included severe hepatic impairment for which no clinical data are available. Inclusion of other modality agnostic physiological changes relevant to organ impairment did not alter the findings. Changes in renal physiologies, including changes in GFR across various degrees of impairment, well predicted minimal changes in PD for inclisiran and vutrisiran. This work provides a quantitative mechanistic framework and insights on modality-specific factors that drive clinical translation and patient/disease-related factors that impact specific dosing considerations and clinical outcomes to help accelerate the optimal development of siRNA therapeutics., (© 2024 Amgen Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Bispecific T cell engagers (Bi-TCEs) have revolutionized the treatment of oncology indications across both liquid and solid tumors. Bi-TCEs are rapidly evolving from conventional intravenous (i.v.) to more convenient subcutaneous (s.c.) administrations and extending beyond adults to also benefit pediatric patients. Leveraging clinical development experience across three generations of Bi-TCE molecules across both liquid and solid tumor indications from i.v./s.c. dosing in adults and pediatric subjects, we developed a mechanistic-physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) platform model for Bi-TCEs. The model utilizes a full PBPK model framework and was successfully validated for PK predictions following i.v. and s.c. dosing across both liquid and solid tumor space in adults for eight Bi-TCEs. After refinement to incorporate physiological ontogeny, the model was successfully validated to predict pediatric PKs in 1 month - < 2 years, 2-11 years, and 12-17 years old subjects following i.v. dosing. Following s.c. dosing in pediatric subjects, the model predicted similar bioavailability, however, a shorter time to maximum concentration (T max ) for the three age groups compared with adults. The model was also applied to guide the dosing strategy for first generation of Bi-TCEs for organ impairment, specifically renal impairment, and was able to accurately predict the impact of renal impairment on PK for these relatively small-size Bi-TCEs. This work highlights a novel mechanistic platform model for accurately predicting the PK in adult and pediatric patients across liquid and solid tumor indications from i.v./s.c. dosing and can be used to guide optimal dose and dosing regimen selection and accelerating the clinical development for Bi-TCEs., (© 2023 Amgen Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2023 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

With the promise of a potentially single-dose curative regimen, CAR-T cell therapies have brought a paradigm shift in the treatment and management of hematological malignancies with 6 approved products in the USA. However, there are no approved CAR-T cell therapies for solid tumors. Herein, we report the clinical pharmacology profile of AMG 119, the first CAR-T cell therapy targeting delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3), in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). AMG 119 demonstrated robust cellular expansion with long-lasting cell persistence and a favorable exposure-response relationship. AMG 119 has been demonstrated to be clinically safe and well tolerated at the doses tested, with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) reported. This is the first publication of the clinical pharmacology profile of a CAR-T cell therapy in SCLC, with encouraging cellular kinetics data supporting the potential for CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumor space., (© 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

CAR-T therapies have shown remarkable efficacy against hematological malignancies in the clinic over the last decade and new studies indicate that progress is being made to use these novel therapies to target solid tumors as well as treat autoimmune disease. Innovation in the field, including TCR-T, allogeneic or "off the shelf" CAR-T, and autoantigen/armored CAR-Ts are likely to increase the efficacy and applications of these therapies. The unique aspects of these cell-based therapeutics; patient-derived cells, intracellular expression, in vivo expansion, and phenotypic changes provide unique bioanalytical challenges to develop pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assessments. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group (TALG) has brought together a group of industry experts to discuss and consider these challenges. In this white paper, we present the IQ consortium perspective on the best practices and considerations for bioanalytical and immunogenicity aspects toward the optimal development of CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2023 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

With the promise of a potentially "single dose curative" paradigm, CAR-T cell therapies have brought a paradigm shift in the treatment and management of hematological malignancies. Both CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies have also made great progress toward the successful treatment of solid tumor indications. The field is rapidly evolving with recent advancements including the clinical development of "off-the-shelf" allogeneic CAR-T therapies that can overcome the long and difficult "vein-to-vein" wait time seen with autologous CAR-T therapies. There are unique clinical pharmacology, pharmacometric, bioanalytical, and immunogenicity considerations and challenges in the development of these CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies. Hence, to help accelerate the development of these life-saving therapies for the patients with cancer, experts in this field came together under the umbrella of International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) to form a joint working group between the Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group (CPLG) and the Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group (TALG). In this white paper, we present the IQ consortium perspective on the best practices and considerations for clinical pharmacology and pharmacometric aspects toward the optimal development of CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies., (© 2023 Amgen Inc and The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2023 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Interest and efforts to use recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAV) as gene therapy delivery tools to treat disease have grown exponentially. However, gaps in understanding of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and disposition of this modality exist. This position paper comes from the Novel Modalities Working Group (WG), part of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ). The pan-industry WG effort focuses on the nonclinical PK and clinical pharmacology aspects of AAV gene therapy and related bioanalytical considerations.Traditional PK concepts are generally not applicable to AAV-based therapies due to the inherent complexity of a transgene-carrying viral vector, and the multiple steps and analytes involved in cell transduction and transgene-derived protein expression. Therefore, we explain PK concepts of biodistribution of AAV-based therapies and place key terminologies related to drug exposure and PD in the proper context. Factors affecting biodistribution are presented in detail, and guidelines are provided to design nonclinical studies to enable a stage-gated progression to Phase 1 testing. The nonclinical and clinical utility of transgene DNA, mRNA, and protein analytes are discussed with bioanalytical strategies to measure these analytes. The pros and cons of qPCR vs. ddPCR technologies for DNA/RNA measurement and qualitative vs. quantitative methods for transgene-derived protein are also presented. Last, best practices and recommendations for use of clinical and nonclinical data to project human dose and response are discussed. Together, the manuscript provides a holistic framework to discuss evolving concepts of PK/PD modeling, bioanalytical technologies, and clinical dose selection in gene therapy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Background: Carfilzomib is an irreversible second-generation proteasome inhibitor that has a short elimination half-life but much longer pharmacodynamic (PD) effect based on its irreversible mechanism of action, making it amenable to longer dosing intervals. A mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was built using a bottom-up approach, based on the mechanism of action of carfilzomib and the biology of the proteasome, to provide further evidence of the comparability of once-weekly and twice-weekly dosing., Methods: The model was qualified using clinical data from the phase III ENDEAVOR study, where the safety and efficacy of bortezomib (a reversible proteasome inhibitor) and carfilzomib were compared. Simulations were performed to compare the average proteasome inhibition across five cycles of treatment for the 20/70 mg/m 2 once-weekly (70 QW) and 20/56 mg/m 2 twice-weekly (56 BIW) regimens., Results: Results indicated that while 70 QW had a higher maximum concentration (C max ) and lower steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) than 56 BIW, the average proteasome inhibition after five cycles of treatment between the regimens was comparable. Presumably, the higher C max of carfilzomib from 70 QW compensates for the lower overall AUC compared with 56 BIW, and hence 70 QW is expected to have comparable proteasome inhibition, and therefore comparable efficacy, to 56 BIW. The comparable model-predicted proteasome inhibition between 70 QW and 56 BIW also translated to comparable clinical response, in terms of overall response rate and progression-free survival., Conclusion: This work provides a framework for which mechanistic PK/PD modeling can be used to guide optimization of dosing intervals for therapeutics with significantly longer PD effects than PK, and help further justify patient-convenient, longer dosing intervals., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a first-in-class oncolytic virotherapy approved for the treatment of unresectable melanoma recurrent after initial surgery. Biodistribution data from a phase II study was used to develop a viral kinetic mechanistic model describing the interaction between cytokines such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), the immune system, and T-VEC treatment. Our analysis found that (1) the viral infection rate has a great influence on T-VEC treatment efficacy; (2) an increase in T-VEC dose of 10 2 plaque-forming units/ml 21 days and beyond after the initial dose of T-VEC resulted in an ~12% increase in response; and (3) at the systemic level, the ratio of resting innate immune cells to the death rate of innate immune impact T-VEC treatment efficacy. This analysis clarifies under which condition the immune system either assists in eliminating tumor cells or inhibits T-VEC treatment efficacy, which is critical to both efficiently design future oncolytic agents and understand cancer development., (© 2022 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Targeting the MDM2-p53 interaction using AMG 232 is synergistic with MAPK inhibitors (MAPKi) in preclinical melanoma models. We postulated that AMG 232 plus MAPKi is safe and more effective than MAPKi alone in TP53-wild type, MAPKi-naïve metastatic melanoma., Methods: Patients were treated with increasing (120 mg, 180 mg, 240 mg) oral doses of AMG 232 (seven-days-on, 15-days-off, 21-day cycle) plus dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) (Arm 1, BRAFV600-mutant) or T alone (Arm 2, BRAFV600-wild type). Patients were treated for seven days with AMG 232 alone before adding T±D. Safety and efficacy were assessed using CTCAE v4.0 and RECIST v1.1 criteria, respectively. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed at baseline and steady-state levels for AMG 232., Results: 31 patients were enrolled. Ten and 21 patients were enrolled in Arm 1 and Arm 2, respectively. The most common AMG 232-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (87%), diarrhea (77%), and fatigue (74%). Seven patients (23%) were withdrawn from the study due to AMG 232-related AEs. Three dose-limiting AEs occurred (Arm 1, 180 mg, nausea; Arm 2, 240 mg, grade 3 pulmonary embolism; Arm 2, 180 mg, grade 4 thrombocytopenia). AMG 232 PK exposures were not altered when AMG 232 was combined with T±D. Objective responses were seen in 8/10 (Arm 1) and 3/20 (Arm 2) evaluable patients. The median progression-free survival for Arm 1 and Arm 2 was 19.0 months-not reached and 2.8 months, respectively., Conclusion: The maximum tolerated dose of AMG 232 for both arms was 120 mg. AMG 232 plus T±D exhibited a favorable PK profile. Although objective responses occurred in both arms, adding AMG 232 to T±D did not confer additional clinical benefit., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a rapidly evolving area of drug development and hold significant promise. To date, nine ADCs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These conjugates combine the target specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the anticancer activity of small-molecule therapeutics (also referred to as payload). Due to the complex structure, three analytes, namely ADC conjugate, total antibody, and unconjugated payload, are typically quantified during drug development; however, the benefits of measuring all three analytes at later stages of clinical development are not clear. The cytotoxic payloads, upon release from the ADC, are considered to behave like small molecules. Given the relatively high potency and low systemic exposure of cytotoxic payloads, drug-drug interaction (DDI) considerations for ADCs might be different from traditional small molecule therapeutics. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ Consortium) convened an ADC working group to create an IQ ADC database that includes 26 ADCs with six unique payloads. The analysis of the ADC data in the IQ database, as well as nine approved ADCs, supports the strategy of pharmacokinetic characterization of all three analytes in early-phase development and progressively minimizing the number of analytes to be measured in the late-phase studies. The systemic concentrations of unconjugated payload are usually too low to serve as a DDI perpetrator; however, the potential for unconjugated payloads as a victim still exists. A data-driven and risk-based decision tree was developed to guide the assessment of a circulating payload as a victim of DDI., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2021 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Advances in immuno-oncology have provided a variety of novel therapeutics that harness the innate immune system to identify and destroy neoplastic cells. It is noteworthy that acceptable safety profiles accompany the development of these targeted therapies, which result in efficacious cancer treatment with higher survival rates and lower toxicities. Adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) has shown promising results in inducing sustainable remissions in patients suffering from refractory diseases. Two main types of ACT include engineered Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) T cells. The application of these immuno-therapies in the last few years has been successful and has demonstrated a safe and rapid treatment regimen for solid and non-solid tumors. The current review presents an insight into the clinical pharmacology aspects of immuno-therapies, especially CAR-T cells. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of TCR and CAR-T cell immunotherapy with particular focus on the structure of CAR-T cells, the effects and toxicities associated with these therapies in clinical trials, risk mitigation strategies, dose selection approaches, and cellular kinetics. Finally, the quantitative approaches and modeling techniques used in the development of CAR-T cell therapies are described., (© 2022 Amgen, Inc. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Immunogenicity has imposed a challenge to efficacy and safety evaluation of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-based gene therapies. Mild to severe adverse events observed in clinical development have been implicated with host immune responses against AAV gene therapies, resulting in comprehensive evaluation of immunogenicity during nonclinical and clinical studies mandated by health authorities. Immunogenicity of AAV gene therapies is complex due to the number of risk factors associated with product components and pre-existing immunity in human subjects. Different clinical mitigation strategies have been employed to alleviate treatment-induced or -boosted immunogenicity in order to achieve desired efficacy, reduce toxicity, or treat more patients who are seropositive to AAV vectors. In this review, the immunogenicity risk assessment, manifestation of immunogenicity and its impact in nonclinical and clinical studies, and various clinical mitigation strategies are summarized. Last, we present bioanalytical strategies, methodologies, and assay validation applied to appropriately monitor immunogenicity in AAV gene therapy-treated subjects., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Purpose: Panitumumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for the treatment of wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Currently, no dedicated clinical studies have evaluated the effect of organ impairment on the pharmacokinetics of panitumumab. Here, we present data from late phase studies of panitumumab in patients with mCRC and analyses of the effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the exposure of panitumumab., Methods: From three multicenter, open-label, phase 2 and phase 3 studies, 349 and 351 patients were included in hepatic and renal function subgroup analyses, respectively. Patients who received IV panitumumab and serum exposures were compared to patients with varying degrees of hepatic and renal organ dysfunction., Results: The C max and C trough values for patients with mild (n = 119) and moderate (n = 4) hepatic impairment were within the range of serum concentrations of panitumumab for the normal hepatic function subgroup. The distributions of serum concentration of panitumumab in patients with mild (n = 85) or moderate (n = 19) renal impairment were similar to the serum concentrations of panitumumab in the normal renal function subgroup. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and covariate analysis results were also consistent with lack of any significant effect of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of panitumumab. Additionally, real-world evidence from case studies of patients with mCRC and severe hepatic or renal impairment, which is a rare patient population to study, indicated lack of clinically relevant differences in exposure of panitumumab compared with patients with mCRC and normal hepatic or renal function., Conclusions: Mild-to-moderate hepatic or renal dysfunction had no clinically meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of panitumumab in patients with mCRC. No dose adjustments for panitumumab are warranted in patients with mCRC with mild-to-moderate hepatic or renal dysfunction., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00083616, NCT00089635, NCT00113763., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The predictive performance of physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) models for pharmacokinetics (PK) in renal impairment (RI) and hepatic impairment (HI) populations was evaluated using clinical data from 29 compounds with 106 organ impairment study arms were collected from 19 member companies of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development. Fifty RI and 56 HI study arms with varying degrees of organ insufficiency along with control populations were evaluated. For RI, the area under the curve (AUC) ratios of RI to healthy control were predicted within twofold of the observed ratios for > 90% (N = 47/50 arms). For HI, > 70% (N = 43/56 arms) of the hepatically impaired to healthy control AUC ratios were predicted within twofold. Inaccuracies, typically overestimation of AUC ratios, occurred more in moderate and severe HI. PBPK predictions can help determine the need and timing of organ impairment study. It may be suitable for predicting the impact of RI on PK of drugs predominantly cleared by metabolism with varying contribution of renal clearance. PBPK modeling may be used to support mild impairment study waivers or clinical study design., (© 2020 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), thereby inhibiting the growth and survival of tumors expressing EGFR. Panitumumab received approval in the USA in 2006 for the treatment of wild-type RAS (defined as wild-type in both KRAS and NRAS) metastatic colorectal cancer. Over the last 10 years, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of panitumumab has been studied to further evaluate its safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing regimen. In this review, we summarize the key clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacology data for panitumumab, and considerations for its use in special populations. Panitumumab has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile and its approved dosing regimen (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) is based on body weight; dose adjustments are not needed based on sex, age, or renal or hepatic impairment. Drug interactions do not occur when panitumumab is combined with chemotherapy drugs including irinotecan, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. The level of tumor EGFR expression was found to have no effect on panitumumab pharmacokinetics or efficacy. The incidence of anti-panitumumab antibodies is low; when anti-panitumumab antibodies are produced, they do not affect the efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetics of panitumumab. In summary, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of panitumumab is well suited for standard dosing, and the approved body weight-based dosing regimen maintains efficacy and safety in the treatment of wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer across a broad range of patients., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Body weight can affect exposure, safety and efficacy of antibody-based therapies; sometimes these effects may not be clinically relevant. Panitumumab is approved for wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer, using a body weight-based dosing regimen. Recently, a report cited fixed-dose usage of panitumumab, rather than approved body weight-based dosing. The current work evaluates optimal dosing regimen scientifically based on clinical data, modeling and simulation. Herein, we assessed the effect of fixed and body weight-based dosing on panitumumab pharmacokinetics to determine which approach resulted in the least interpatient pharmacokinetic variability., Patients and Methods: From the Vectibix program, 352 patients enrolled in three studies were evaluated; they had received panitumumab (body weight-based dose: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and had pharmacokinetic (maximum serum [C max] and trough [C min ] concentrations) and body weight data available. Additionally, concentration-time profiles at fixed (480 mg) and body weight-based doses (6 mg/kg) were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics model developed from 1200 patients., Results: After administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg, C max and C min increased with increasing body weight; the mean C max and C min for patients weighing <65 kg (lower quartile) were 23% and 30% lower, respectively, than for those weighing >88 kg (upper quartile). The simulated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) data also indicated that overall panitumumab exposure increased with increasing body weight for the body weight-based regimen. When AUC was simulated for a fixed dose (480 mg), the opposite effect was observed. Over the range of body weights, interpatient variability in simulated AUC was lower for the weight-based dose (29%) than for the fixed dose (34%)., Conclusion: Results demonstrate that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) reduced variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights compared with the fixed-dose approach, indicating that a body weight-based approach is the recommended patient dosing strategy., (© 2020 Liao et al.)

Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) is a valuable component of the quantitative pharmacology toolkit for model-informed drug discovery and development. It enables principled decision making with a totality of evidence mindset through integration of internal and external data across multiple dimensions (e.g., targets/mechanisms, molecules/drugs, doses/regimens, diseases/indications, populations, endpoints, and clinical trial designs). MBMA distinguishes itself from traditional meta-analysis by infusing pharmacologic plausibility into the statistical rigor that typifies meta-analytic data integration. This is possible through mechanism-informed formulation of pharmacologically inspired cause-effect and dose-response relationships, time course of treatment effects, and interrelationships between proximal and distal outcomes of modulation of disease biology and pathophysiology. In this review, we offer a question-based approach to enhance appreciation of the value of MBMA across the continuum from drug discovery and translational research through clinical development, comparative effectiveness research, and postapproval optimization of therapeutics using illustrative examples across therapeutic areas., (© 2019 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2019 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Regulatory agencies currently recommend itraconazole (ITZ) as a strong cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor for clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. This work by an International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development working group (WG) is to develop and verify a mechanistic ITZ physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model and provide recommendations for optimal DDI study design based on model simulations. To support model development and verification, in vitro and clinical PK data for ITZ and its metabolites were collected from WG member companies. The model predictions of ITZ DDIs with seven different CYP3A substrates were within the guest criteria for 92% of area under the concentration-time curve ratios and 95% of maximum plasma concentration ratios, thus verifying the model for DDI predictions. The verified model was used to simulate various clinical DDI study scenarios considering formulation, duration of dosing, dose regimen, and food status to recommend the optimal design for maximal inhibitory effect by ITZ., (© 2019 The Authors CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) is expressed in a significant percentage of primary and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), a common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. AMG 595 is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a fully human, anti-EGFRvIII monoclonal antibody linked to DM1. The study goals were to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of AMG 595 in GBM., Methods: In this phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, sequential-dose, exploration study, adults with recurrent GBM received AMG 595 once every 3 weeks (Q3W) according to incremental dosing cohorts (0.5-3.0 mg/kg). Primary endpoints were to assess safety, the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), objective response (per Macdonald criteria), evaluate pharmacokinetics, and estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)., Results: Of 382 patients screened, 32 were enrolled and received ≥ 1 dose of AMG 595. Ten patients experienced 18 DLTs (all grade 4 thrombocytopenia), and the MTD was 2.0 mg/kg. Twenty-eight patients (88%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse event (AE); the most common AEs were thrombocytopenia (50%) and fatigue (25%). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 17 patients (53%); 11 (34%) had serious treatment-emergent AEs, and none were considered treatment related. Pharmacokinetic profiles indicated low levels of circulating unconjugated antibody and cytotoxin, dose-proportional increases in plasma exposures for the conjugated antibody over the studied range, and less than twofold accumulation following multiple Q3W dosing. Two patients (6%) had partial responses; 15 (47%) had stable disease., Conclusions: AMG 595 exhibited favorable pharmacokinetics and is a unique therapy with possible benefit for some patients with EGFRvIII-mutated GBM with limited therapeutic options.

Purpose: This study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the anti-CD27L antibody-drug conjugate AMG 172 in patients with relapsed/refractory clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)., Methods: This was an open-label, adaptive dose-exploration study in patients with relapsed/refractory ccRCC. The study was conducted in two parts for dose exploration and dose expansion on a biweekly dosing schedule. AMG 172 doses of 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.4 mg/kg were studied in the dose-exploration phase., Results: The 1.6 mg/kg dose of AMG 172 was identified as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The most common adverse events were thrombocytopenia (59%), nausea (54%), decreased appetite (49%), vomiting (46%), and fatigue (35%). The most common dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia and liver injury constituted DLTs that required discontinuation of treatment. Of the 10 patients treated at the MTD in part 2 of the study, 2 patients had grade 3 hepatocellular injury with aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase elevation. Pharmacokinetic profiles indicated low levels of circulating unconjugated antibody and unconjugated cytotoxin. Dose-proportional increases in plasma exposure were observed over the dose range of 0.3-2.4 mg/kg. Following multiple biweekly doses, plasma accumulation was less than two-fold. Two patients (5.4%) had a partial response, 6 patients (16.2%) had stable disease, and 13 patients (35.1%) had progressive disease., Conclusion: AMG 172 exhibited a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in patients with relapsed/refractory ccRCC and showed evidence suggestive of limited antitumor activity. Safety and tolerability were as expected for a maytansinoid antibody-drug conjugate.

Background: This open-label, first-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AMG 228, an agonistic human IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein (GITR), in patients with refractory advanced solid tumors., Methods: AMG 228 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W). Dose escalation was in two stages: single-patient cohorts (3, 9, 30, and 90 mg), followed by "rolling six" design (n = 2-6; 180, 360, 600, 900, and 1200 mg). Primary endpoints included incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), AEs, and pharmacokinetics. Additional endpoints were objective response and pharmacodynamic response., Results: Thirty patients received AMG 228, which was well tolerated up to the maximum planned dose (1200 mg). No DLTs occurred; the MTD was not reached. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (13%), infusion-related reaction (7%), pyrexia (7%), decreased appetite (7%), and hypophosphatemia (7%). Two patients had binding anti-AMG 228 antibodies (one at baseline); no neutralizing antibodies were detected. AMG 228 exhibited target-mediated drug disposition, and serum exposure was approximately dose proportional at 180-1200 mg and greater than dose proportional at 3-1200 mg. Doses > 360 mg Q3W achieved serum trough coverage for 95% in vitro GITR occupancy. Despite GITR coverage in peripheral blood and tumor biopsies, there was no evidence of T-cell activation or anti-tumor activity., Conclusions: In patients with advanced solid tumors, AMG 228 Q3W was tolerable up to the highest tested dose (1200 mg), exhibited favorable pharmacokinetics, and provided target coverage indicating a pharmacokinetic profile appropriate for longer intervals. However, there was no evidence of T-cell activation or anti-tumor activity with AMG 228 monotherapy., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02437916 .

The accurate prediction of pharmacokinetics (PK) is fundamental to underwriting safety and efficacy in pediatric clinical trials; age-dependent PK may be observed with pediatrics because of the growth and maturation processes that occur during development. Understanding the ontogeny of drug-metabolizing enzymes is a critical enabler for pediatric PK prediction, as enzyme expression or activity may change with age. Although ontogeny functions for the cytochrome P450s (CYPs) have been developed, disconnects between ontogeny functions for the same CYP may exist, depending on whether the functions were derived from in vitro or in vivo data. This report describes the development of ontogeny functions for all the major hepatic CYPs based on in vitro or in vivo data; these ontogeny functions were subsequently incorporated into a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model and evaluated. Pediatric PK predictions based on in vivo-derived ontogeny functions performed markedly better than those developed from in vitro data for intravenous (100% versus 51% within 2-fold, respectively) and oral (98% versus 67%, respectively) dosing. The verified models were then applied to complex pediatric scenarios involving active metabolites, CYP polymorphisms and physiological changes because of critical illness; the models reasonably explained the observed age-dependent changes in pediatric PK., (© 2015, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Resistance to aromatase inhibitors is a major concern in the treatment of breast cancer. Long-term letrozole cultured (LTLC) cells represent a model of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. The LTLC cells were earlier generated by culturing MCF-7Ca, the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line stably transfected with human placental aromatase gene for a prolonged period in the presence of letrozole. In the present study the effect of RAMBA, VN/14-1 on the sensitivity of LTLC cells upon multiple passaging and the mechanisms of action of VN/14-1 in such high passage LTLC (HP-LTLC) cells was investigated. We report that multiple passaging of LTLC cells (HP-LTLC cell clones) led to profound decrease in their sensitivity to VN/14-1. Additionally, microarray studies and protein analysis revealed that VN/14-1 induced marked endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and autophagy in HP-LTLC cells. We further report that VN/14-1 in combination with thapsigargin exhibited synergistic anti-cancer effect in HP-LTLC cells. Preliminary pharmacokinetics in rats revealed that VN/14-1 reached a peak plasma concentration (Cmax) within 0.17h after oral dosing. Its absolute oral bioavailability was >100%. Overall these results indicate potential of VN/14-1 for further clinical development as a potential oral agent for the treatment of breast cancer., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Apixaban is an oral, direct, factor-Xa inhibitor approved for thromboprophylaxis in patients who have undergone elective hip or knee replacement surgery and for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This open label, parallel group study investigated effects of extremes of body weight on apixaban pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability., Method: Fifty-four healthy subjects were enrolled [18 each into low (≤50 kg), reference (65-85 kg) and high (≥120 kg) body weight groups]. Following administration of a single oral dose of 10 mg apixaban, plasma and urine samples were collected for determination of apixaban pharmacokinetics and anti-factor Xa activity. Adverse events, vital signs and laboratory assessments were monitored., Results: Compared with the reference body weight group, low body weight had approximately 27% [90% confidence interval (CI): 8-51%] and 20% (90% CI: 11-42%) higher apixaban maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), respectively, and high body weight had approximately 31% (90% CI: 18-41%) and 23% (90% CI: 9-35%) lower apixaban Cmax and AUC(0,∞) , respectively. Apixaban renal clearance was similar across the weight groups. Plasma anti-factor Xa activity showed a direct, linear relationship with apixaban plasma concentration, regardless of body weight group. Apixaban was well tolerated in this study., Conclusion: The modest change in apixaban exposure is unlikely to require dose adjustment for apixaban based on body weight alone. However, caution is warranted in the presence of additional factors (such as severe renal impairment) that could increase apixaban exposure., (© 2013 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2013 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: As compared with individual tablets, saxagliptin/metformin immediate release (IR) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets offer the potential for increased convenience, compliance, and adherence for patients requiring combination therapy., Objectives: Two bioequivalence studies assessed the fed-state and the fasted-state bioequivalence of saxagliptin/metformin IR 2.5 mg/500 mg FDC (study 1) and saxagliptin/metformin IR 2.5 mg/1,000 mg FDC (study 2) relative to the same dosage strengths of the individual component tablets [saxagliptin (Onglyza™) and metformin IR (Glucophage(®))] administered concurrently., Study Designs: These were randomized, open-label, single-dose, four-period, four-treatment, crossover studies in healthy subjects (n = 24 in each study). The treatments in study 1 were a saxagliptin/metformin IR 2.5 mg/500 mg FDC tablet in the fed and fasted states on separate occasions, and saxagliptin 2.5 mg and metformin IR 500 mg tablets co-administered in the fed state and fasted states on separate occasions. The treatments in study 2 were a saxagliptin/metformin IR 2.5 mg/1,000 mg FDC tablet in the fed and fasted states on separate occasions, and saxagliptin 2.5 mg and metformin IR 1,000 mg co-administered in the fed state and fasted states on separate occasions. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of each treatment were evaluated., Results: For both studies, saxagliptin and metformin in the FDCs were bioequivalent to the individual components in both the fed and the fasted states as the limits of the 90 % confidence interval of the ratio of adjusted geometric means for all key pharmacokinetic parameters were contained within the predefined 0.800 to 1.250 bioequivalence criteria. Co-administration of saxagliptin and metformin IR was generally safe and well tolerated as the FDCs or as individual tablets., Conclusions: Saxagliptin/metformin IR 2.5 mg/500 mg and saxagliptin/metformin IR 2.5 mg/1,000 mg FDCs were bioequivalent to individual tablets of saxagliptin and metformin of the same strengths in both the fed and the fasted states. No unexpected safety findings were observed with saxagliptin/metformin IR administration. The tolerability of the FDC of saxagliptin/metformin IR was comparable to that of the co-administered individual components. These results indicate that the safety and efficacy profile of co-administration of saxagliptin and metformin can be extended to the saxagliptin/metformin IR FDC tablets.

Saxagliptin (Onglyza™) is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. This open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study in 20 healthy female subjects investigated the effect of saxagliptin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the active components of a combined oral contraceptive (COC). Subjects received either COC (Ortho-Cyclen(®)) once daily (QD) for 21 days, then 5 mg saxagliptin QD + COC QD for 21 days, or vice versa. Coadministration of saxagliptin and COC did not alter the steady-state PK of the primary active oestrogen (ethinyl estradiol) or progestin (norelgestromin) COC components. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of an active metabolite of norelgestromin (norgestrel) were increased by 13 and 17%, respectively, a magnitude that was not considered clinically meaningful. Coadministration of saxagliptin and COC in this study was generally well-tolerated. Saxagliptin can be co-prescribed with an oestrogen/progestin combination for women taking oral contraceptive., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

The dependency of metformin in vivo disposition on the rate and extent of dissolution was studied. The analysis includes the use of fundamental principles of drug input, permeability, and intestinal transit time within the framework of a compartmental absorption transit model to predict key pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and then compare the results to clinical data. The simulations show that the maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ) and area under the curve (AUC) are not significantly affected when 100% of drug is released within 2 h of oral dosing, which was confirmed with corresponding human PK data. Furthermore, in vitro dissolution profiles measured in aqueous buffers at pH values of 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8 were slower than in vivo release profiles generated by deconvolution of metformin products that were bioequivalent. On the basis of this work, formulations of metformin that release 100% in vitro in a   time period equal to or less than two hours are indicated to be bioequivalent. The use of modeling offers a mechanistic-based approach for demonstrating acceptable bioperformance for metformin formulations without having to resort to in vivo bioequivalence studies and may be more robust than statistical comparison of in vitro release profiles. This work further provides a strategy for considering Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class 3 compounds to be included under biowaiver guidelines as for BCS Class 1 compounds., (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aim: To investigate the effect of co-administration of rifampicin, a potent inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzymes, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin in healthy subjects. Saxagliptin is metabolized by CYP3A4/3A5 to 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, its major pharmacologically active metabolite., Methods: In a non-randomized, open label, single sequence design, 14 healthy subjects received single oral doses of saxagliptin 5 mg with and without steady-state rifampicin (600 mg once daily for 6 days). PK (saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin) and PD (plasma DPP-4 activity) were measured for up to 24 h on days 1 and 7., Results: Concomitant administration with rifampicin resulted in 53% (point estimate 0.47, 90% CI 0.38, 0.57) and 76% (point estimate 0.24, 90% CI 0.21, 0.27) decreases in the geometric mean C(max) and AUC values of saxagliptin, respectively, with a 39% (point estimate 1.39, 90% CI 1.23, 1.56) increase in the geometric mean C(max) and no change (point estimate 1.03, 90% CI 0.97, 1.09) in the AUC of 5-hydroxy saxagliptin. Similar maximum % inhibition and area under the % inhibition-time effect curve over 24 h for DPP-4 activity were observed when saxagliptin was administered alone or with rifampicin. The saxagliptin total active moieties exposure (AUC) decreased by 27% (point estimate 0.73, 90% CI 0.66, 0.81). Saxagliptin with or without rifampicin in this study was generally well tolerated., Conclusions: Lack of change of PD effect of saxagliptin is consistent with the observed 27% reduction in systemic exposure to the total active moieties, which is not considered clinically meaningful. Based on these findings, it is not necessary to adjust the saxagliptin dose when co-administered with rifampicin., (© 2011 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.)

It is well established that 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) causes acute liver damage in animals and humans. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize oxidative modification and inactivation of cytosolic proteins in MDMA-exposed rats. Markedly increased levels of oxidized and nitrated cytosolic proteins were detected 12 h after the second administration of two consecutive MDMA doses (10 mg/kg each). Comparative 2-DE analysis showed markedly increased levels of biotin-N-methylimide-labeled oxidized cytosolic proteins in MDMA-exposed rats compared to vehicle-treated rats. Proteins in the 22 gel spots of strong intensities were identified using MS/MS. The oxidatively modified proteins identified include anti-oxidant defensive enzymes, a calcium-binding protein, and proteins involved in metabolism of lipids, nitrogen, and carbohydrates (glycolysis). Cytosolic superoxide dismutase was oxidized and its activity significantly inhibited following MDMA exposure. Consistent with the oxidative inactivation of peroxiredoxin, MDMA activated c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase and p38 kinase. Since these protein kinases phosphorylate anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein, their activation may promote apoptosis in MDMA-exposed tissues. Our results show for the first time that MDMA induces oxidative-modification of many cytosolic proteins accompanied with increased oxidative stress and apoptosis, contributing to hepatic damage., (Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Despite numerous reports about the acute and sub-chronic toxicities caused by MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, ecstasy), the underlying mechanism of organ damage is poorly understood. The aim of this review is to present an update of the mechanistic studies on MDMA-mediated organ damage partly caused by increased oxidative/nitrosative stress. Because of the extensive reviews on MDMA-mediated oxidative stress and tissue damage, we specifically focus on the mechanisms and consequences of oxidative-modifications of mitochondrial proteins, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction. We briefly describe a method to systematically identify oxidatively-modified mitochondrial proteins in control and MDMA-exposed rats by using biotin-N-maleimide (biotin-NM) as a sensitive probe for oxidized proteins. We also describe various applications and advantages of this Cys-targeted proteomics method and alternative approaches to overcome potential limitations of this method in studying oxidized proteins from MDMA-exposed tissues. Finally we discuss the mechanism of synergistic drug-interaction between MDMA and other abused substances including alcohol (ethanol) as well as application of this redox-based proteomics method in translational studies for developing effective preventive and therapeutic agents against MDMA-induced organ damage.

Alcohol (ethanol) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) are frequently co-abused, but recent findings indicate a harmful drug interaction between these two agents. In our previous study, we showed that MDMA exposure inhibits the activity of the acetaldehyde (ACH) metabolizing enzyme, aldehyde dehydrogenase2 (ALDH2). Based on this finding, we hypothesized that the co-administration of MDMA and ethanol would reduce the metabolism of ACH and result in increased accumulation of ACH. Rats were treated with MDMA or vehicle and then administered a single dose of ethanol. Liver ALDH2 activity decreased by 35% in the MDMA-treated rats compared to control rats. The peak concentration and the area under the concentration versus time curve of plasma ACH were 31% and 59% higher, respectively, in the MDMA-ethanol group compared to the ethanol-only group. In addition, the MDMA-ethanol group had 80% higher plasma transaminase levels than the ethanol-only group, indicating greater hepatocellular damage. Our results not only support a drug interaction between MDMA and ethanol but a novel underlying mechanism for the interaction.

Salvinorin A is an unregulated potent hallucinogen isolated from the leaves of Salvia divinorum. It is the only known non-nitrogenous kappa-opioid selective agonist, and rivals synthetic lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in potency. The objective of this study was to characterize the in vitro transport, in vitro metabolism, and pharmacokinetic properties of Salvinorin A. The transport characteristics of Salvinorin A were assessed using MDCK-MDR1 cell monolayers. The P-glycoprotein (P-gp) affinity status was assessed by the P-gp ATPase assay. In vitro metabolism studies were performed with various specific human CYP450 isoforms and UGT2B7 to assess the metabolic characteristics of Salvinorin A. Cohorts (n = 3) of male Sprague Dawley rats were used to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and brain distribution of Salvinorin A (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.) over a 240-min period. A validated UV-HPLC and LC/MS/MS method was used to quantify the hallucinogen concentrations obtained from the in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively. Salvinorin A displayed a high secretory transport in the MDCK-MDR1 cells (4.07 +/- 1.34 x 10(-)5 cm/s). Salvinorin A also stimulated the P-gp ATPase activity in a concentration (5 and 10 microM)-dependent manner, suggesting that it may be a substrate of (P-gp). A significant decrease in Salvinorin A concentration ranging from 14.7 +/- 0.80% to 31.1 +/- 1.20% was observed after incubation with CYP2D6, CYP1A1, CYP2C18, and CYP2E1, respectively. A significant decrease was also observed after incubation with UGT2B7. These results suggest that Salvinorin A maybe a substrate of UGT2B7, CYP2D6, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, and CYP2C18. The in vivo pharmacokinetic study showed a relatively fast elimination with a half-life (t1/2) of 75 min and a clearance (Cl/F) of 26 L/h/kg. The distribution was extensive (Vd of 47.1 L/kg); however, the brain to plasma ratio was 0.050. Accordingly, the brain half-life was relatively short, 36 min. Salvinorin A is rapidly eliminated after i.p. dosing, in accordance with its fast onset and short duration of action. Further, it appears to be a substrate for various oxidative enzymes and multi-drug resistant protein, P-gp.

Odiparcil is a novel, orally active beta-d-thioxyloside analog with antithrombotic activity associated with a reduced risk of adverse bleeding events. Its unique mechanism of action is postulated by means of an elevation in circulating endogenous chondroitin sulfate-related glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) levels. The purpose of these 2 separate clinical studies was to evaluate plasma GAG levels in healthy subjects administered odiparcil with either aspirin (ASA) or enoxaparin. Clinical plasma samples were processed and analyzed using validated HPLC bioassays that indirectly estimate GAG levels based on the simultaneous detection of the chondroitin disaccharide derivatives. The concomitant administration of odiparcil with or without ASA resulted in a significant elevation in GAG levels over baseline for both treatment groups. In the other clinical study, the concomitant administration of odiparcil with or without enoxaparin displayed significant increases in plasma DeltaDi-OS, DeltaDi-4S, and total disaccharide levels versus control group. Neither plasma GAG levels nor odiparcil plasma levels were correlated with a rise in hepatic transaminases, an adverse drug event observed in several subjects; and plasma odiparcil levels were indirectly correlated with plasma GAG levels. These clinical studies were proof of concept of preclinical rat studies indicating that chronic odiparcil treatment elevates endogenous GAG levels in human subjects.

Despite numerous reports citing the acute hepatotoxicity caused by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (ecstasy), the underlying mechanism of organ damage is poorly understood. We hypothesized that key mitochondrial proteins are oxidatively modified and inactivated in MDMA-exposed tissues. The aim of this study was to identify and investigate the mechanism of inactivation of oxidatively modified mitochondrial proteins, prior to the extensive mitochondrial dysfunction and liver damage following MDMA exposure. MDMA-treated rats showed abnormal liver histology with significant elevation in plasma transaminases, nitric oxide synthase, and the level of hydrogen peroxide. Oxidatively modified mitochondrial proteins in control and MDMA-exposed rats were labeled with biotin-N-maleimide (biotin-NM) as a sensitive probe for oxidized proteins, purified with streptavidin-agarose, and resolved using 2-DE. Comparative 2-DE analysis of biotin-NM-labeled proteins revealed markedly increased levels of oxidatively modified proteins following MDMA exposure. Mass spectrometric analysis identified oxidatively modified mitochondrial proteins involved in energy supply, fat metabolism, antioxidant defense, and chaperone activities. Among these, the activities of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase, 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolases, and ATP synthase were significantly inhibited following MDMA exposure. Our data show for the first time that MDMA causes the oxidative inactivation of key mitochondrial enzymes which most likely contributes to mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent liver damage in MDMA-exposed animals.