This thesis investigates, for the first time, contemporary regulation practices for the nascent private health care sector in Mongolia for the achievement of Universal Health Coverage (UHC). The number of private health care providers has been increasing dramatically in Mongolia during the last two decades. Identifying conducive ways of harnessing and regulating private health care providers is a pressing policy issue for the Mongolian mixed health system in moving towards UHC. However, this issue is yet to be extensively examined. No evidence currently exists on the role of private providers and the appropriateness of current regulatory policy for the achievement of UHC. The lwhat, how, and whyr of the constraining and enabling factors of effective regulation remain largely unknown. This lack of evidence on the contribution of private providers affects not only Mongolia, but developing countries generally. Hence, this comprehensive and rigorous case study of regulation of the private health care sector in Mongolia makes a significant contribution to the advancement of regulatory policy and practices in that country, and informs similar developing countries, in particular, Post-Soviet states.This thesis uses a case-study approach employing both qualitative and quantitative methods. First, in order to define the current role of private providers in the provision of accessible, affordable, and equitable health services, nationally representative hospital admission records for 2013 (n=664,952), have been analysed. This quantitative analysis was supplemented with a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews and document reviews to clarify findings. Second, to identify the gaps in regulatory policy design and implementation, stepped qualitative analysis by Sheikh et al. (2015) has been employed. Document review and analysis were complemented by participant observation and semi-structured in-depth interviews with 45 purposively-selected key informants. Third, to understand how and why regulation of private health care fails or succeeds in Mongolia, regulatory policy analysis has been conducted. The main sources of data used are the analytical synthesis of research findings, in-depth interviews, document reviews, and long-term participant observation of evolution of the system in Mongolia.This thesis has found that until this point, the contribution of the private sector to improving the system performance has been limited. Private-for-profit hospitals are concentrated in urban areas (60% of private hospital admissions were located in Ulaanbaatar, while 95% of private admissions outside Ulaanbaatar were in provincial capitals), deepening the existing rural/urban mal-distribution already established by public providers. Subsequent duplication of public and private services, both in terms of their geographical location and the range of services delivered has led to unnecessary admissions and unnecessary health care costs, having negative financial implications for both patients and overall health expenditure.This thesis has found the private sector contributes to improving access to services for disadvantaged and rural patients, filling in barriers for accessing the public sector. But, the corollary to this enhanced access is a rise in out-of-pocket payments. Private hospitals, even those that are affiliated with the national health insurance scheme, rely heavily on out-of-pocket payments. Patients paid an average of USD $172 for a private admission lsubsidizedr by health insurance, which is unaffordable for average Mongolians, especially for disadvantaged patients. This becomes even more critical when these disadvantaged patients are forced to utilize high-cost private services due to the structural barriers to accessing the public sector, where hospitalization is almost free.This thesis has also found that the regulatory architecture for health care in Mongolia is not optimally designed to improve affordability and quality of private care. The imprecise content and details of regulation in the existing law invite increased political interference. The leadership of the government has failed to establish good governance in health regulation through not engaging key actors in health regulation, nor addressing the fragmentation of different government regulators. These governance issues in the system have been facilitated by a policy of lde-regulationr that has shaped the main lrules of the gamer since the 1990s, guided by a strong privatization discourse. Currently, this is contradicting the focus on UHC, which is a critical global health discourse aimed at ensuring equity in access to quality and affordable care, but requiring more elaborate regulation. This thesis concludes that for the achievement of UHC, a strategic direction which defines the complementary role of private providers in order to optimize public-private service mix is critical. Steering the mixed system in the context of the competing discourses of privatization and UHC is not a simple task, but more elaborate regulation of private health care in mixed systems may bridge these two. A system perspective is critical rather than an isolated approach to private provider regulation, in a context where private providers and their regulation have become an importantmbut not the onlymconcern in implementing UHC.n n