Search

The Chevrel technique is a well-established procedure for open repair of midline incisional hernia. This retrospective single-center case series aims to present the outcome of patients with midline incisional hernia treated with a modified Chevrel technique. The modification itself comprehended the use of a single-layer continuous suture for the inverted anterior rectus abdominis muscle sheet for the creation of the "new linea alba" without overlapping. Between January 2017 and December 2023, 40 patients were operated. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 65%. Hernia recurrence occurred in three patients (7.5%). When the basic principles of the Chevrel technique are respected and conducted, this leads to satisfactory results. The postoperative outcome of this case series showed rates of complications and recurrences in concordance with the already published literature. Therefore, this technique should always be considered for the open approach for midline incisional hernia repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Partial infarction of the great omentum is a rare cause of abdominal pain and may present as a surgical emergency. Omental infarction might occur due to its torsion, but cases without obvious cause are reported. Risk factors related to this condition are overweight, obesity, abdominal trauma, recent abdominal surgery, hypercoagulability, postprandial vascular congestion and an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. Because of the condition's rarity, most patients are treated with surgery and the diagnosis is established intraoperatively. Preoperative diagnosis allows successful conservative treatment with analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs. This case reports a young female patient with class III obesity presented with spontaneous partial infarction of the great omentum treated with laparoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI) and Perineural Invasion (PNI) represent undesirable but still realistic pathological features of rectal cancer, associated with poor prognosis and worse survival. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of LVI and PNI in patients treated for rectal cancer and the impact of LVI and PNI on patient survival. Material and Methods: This retrospective single center observational study, conducted in the period of 2016-2019, includes patients with rectal cancer treated with/without long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Data collection encompassed demographics, tumor characteristics, type of surgery (abdominal perineal rectal resection - APR and low anterior rectal resection - LAR), and LVI/PNI presence. Survival during follow-up was estimated and compared for patients with/without LVI and PNI involvement. Results: A total number of 234 patients (77 females and 157 males) with mean age of 61.3 enrolled in the study. Neoadjuvant CRT was conducted in 170 patients. APR procedure was performed in 67 of them and LAR in 167. LVI presence was noted in 55 (24.4%) and PNI in 77 (34.2%) patients. Mean survival during follow-up was 42.07 months. The use of nCRT influenced on survival (p < 0.033). Patients treated with LAR had better survival outcomes (p = 0.001). Presence of LVI and PNI was associated with a worse prognosis (p < 0.001). Conclusion: PNI was more frequent than the LVI in this study. Patients with nCRT conduction had better overall survival. LVI and PNI presence was associated with poor prognosis in terms of overall survival in patients with rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Lymph node metastasis is the major determinant factor in the prognosis of gastric cancer. There is still no definite consensus on the lymph node number that should be harvested during gastric cancer surgery. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of metastatic nodes to the total number of pathologically examined lymph nodes. LNR has been proposed to be a sensitive prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. In this study the reliability of the LNR is tested for being a prognostic factor in gastric cancer survival. Methods. Medical records of 244 patients, with neither distant metastases nor neoadjuvant treatment underwent curative gastrectomy, were analyzed retrospectively in terms of survival according to the lymph node ratio (LNR). Patients were divided in two groups by using LNR cut-off value. Results. LNR of 0.4 was proved to be the best cut-off value to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that age over 65 (p < 0.001), and LNR = 0.4 (p = 0.02) were independent factors in gastric cancer survival. Patients with LNR = 0.4 presented with worse outcomes regarding other prognostic parameters (tumor differentiation, tumor diameter, lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion), despite similar numbers of lymph nodes being harvested in both groups during surgery. Conclusion. Lymph node ratio is a reliable parameter to predict the survival in gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archives of Clinical & Experimental Medicine is the property of Archives of Clinical & Experimental Medicine and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Emphysematous gastritis is rare infection of the gastric wall associated with high mortality. Damage of the gastric mucosal barrier and bacterial translocation can lead to emphysematous gastritis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use is one of the etiological factors. Due to the high mortality rates, early diagnosis and treatment is important. Patients are presenting to emergency departments generally with non-specific acute abdominal signs. We present a case of an 82 years old patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug that presented to the emergency department with diffuse abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. After establishing the diagnosis, conservative treatment was conducted with success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aims to determine the uncommon causes of acute appendicitis in analyzed post appendectomy specimens., Methods: Histopathology reports of 6785 removed appendices were analyzed retrospectively in order to confirm the uncommon cause of acute appendicitis in single tertiary institution., Results: Unusual cause of acute appendicitis was found in 98 (1.44%) samples (40 female and rest 58 male patients). Neuroen-docrine tumor of the appendix was the most common pathology, followed by serrated adenoma, low-grade appendicular mucinous neoplasm, hyperplastic polyp, and intestinal parasite. In four patients (0.05%), appendicular adenocarcinoma was confirmed with an overall mortality of 75%. Age was significantly higher in uncommon acute appendectomies than in ordinary appendectomies. Survival analysis of unusual appendectomies showed that advanced age is of prognostic importance (Kaplan Meier p<0.0001). There was also a difference in survival between different disease groups in unusual appendectomies, but Cox multifactorial analysis showed that these two factors were not statistically significant., Conclusion: Although rare, unusual causes are the etiological factor responsible for acute appendicitis. These reasons should be kept in mind in the older age group and the diagnosis of appendicitis should be made carefully.

Aim: This single-tertiary non-Covid center retrospective study analyses the impact on Covid-19 pandemic on the presentation and the treatment in patients operated for acute appendicitis., Methods: Total number of 152 patients operated for acute appendicitis in two separate periods (April - August 2019, and April - August 2020), were subjected to retrospective analysis. Patients were divided in two groups: pre-pandemic Group A and pandemic Group B., Results: Eighty one patient was operated in the pandemic period and the rest 71 one year ago in the same period. Preoperative C-reactive protein levels presented statistically higher in the pandemic group (p = 0.0455). Time from admission to surgery was shorter in the pandemic group (7.5 ± 4.6 vs 5.8 ± 4.9; p = 0.0155). Overall operative time and the laparoscopic operative time were statistically longer in the pandemic group (68.8 vs. 76.8 minutes; p = 0.039 and 60.04 vs 74.0 minutes; p = 0.0141, respectively). Complicated appendicitis rates were similar, although periappendicular abscess was more common in the pandemic group, but without statistical significance. Length of stay was shorter in the pandemic group (p = 0.53)., Conclusion: Our data showed that during the Covid-pandemic, acute appendicitis surgery is safe and feasible with results equal to the prepandemic period., Key Words: Appendicitis, Appendectomy, Covid.