Search

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effect of epicutaneous vacuum therapy on the rate of unplanned spinal wound revisions compared with conventional wound dressing. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent unplanned revision spine surgery after primary aseptic spine surgery who were treated at a level I spine centre between December 2011 and December 2019. Patients with revision surgery who required a further unplanned revision surgery during the inpatient stay were considered a treatment failure. The epicutaneous vacuum-assisted closure (Epi-VAC) therapy was the standard treatment method beginning in 2017 (the epi-VAC group). Before, conventional wound dressing was used (the control group (CG)). In addition, a one-to-one matched-pair comparison analysis was performed between both groups. Results Of 218 patients, 48 were in the epi-VAC group. The mean age was 65.1 years (epi-VAC 68.2 to CG 64.3 years (P = 0.085)), and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.2 kg/m2 (epi-VAC 29.4 to CG 27.9 kg/m2 (P = 0.16)). No significant differences in the treatment failure rate could be detected between the two groups (epi-VAC 25% to CG 22.4% (P = 0.7)). There was also no significant difference for the matched-pair analysis (epi-VAC 26.1% to CG 15.2% (P = 0.3)). An elevated CRP level (C-reactive protein) immediately before the first wound revision was a significant risk factor for further revision surgery (treatment failure: 135.2 ± 128.6; no treatment failure: 79.7 ± 86.1 mg/l (P < 0.05)). Conclusion Concerning repeat unplanned wound revision after spinal revision surgery, we cannot demonstrate an advantage of the epicutaneous vacuum therapy over conventional wound dressing.

To assess the potential influence of multifidus atrophy and fatty degeneration on the incidence of adjacent vertebral compression fractures within one year after the index fracture. In a retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent surgery for an OVCF were identified and baseline characteristics, fracture patterns and the occurrence of secondary adjacent fractures within one year were obtained by chart review. Multifidus muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration were determined on preoperative MRI or CT scans. In this analysis of 191 patients (mean age 77 years, SD 8, 116 female), OF type 3 was the most common type of OVCF (49.2%). Symptomatic adjacent OVCFs within one year after index fracture were observed in 23/191 patients (12%) at mean 12, SD 12 weeks (range 1–42 weeks) postoperatively. The mean multifidus muscle area was 264, SD 53 mm2 in patients with an adjacent vertebral fracture and 271, SD 92 mm2 in patients without a secondary fracture (p = 0.755). Mean multifidus fatty infiltration was graded Goutallier 2.2, SD 0.6 in patients with an adjacent fracture and Goutallier 2.2, SD 0.7 in patients without an adjacent fracture (p = 0.694). Pre-existing medication with corticosteroids was associated with the occurrence of an adjacent fracture (p = 0.006). Multifidus area and multifidus fatty infiltration had no significant effect on the occurrence of adjacent vertebral fractures within one year after the index fracture. Patients with a pre-existing medication with corticosteroids were more likely to sustain an adjacent fracture.

Purpose The aim of this systematically review is to detect differences between fractures located at the mid-thoracic spine compared to fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) and the lumbar spine in osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. Methods This review is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search in the PubMed and Web of Science database for publications regarding osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine with respect to the fracture location. Differences in prevalence, cause of fracture, fracture healing, and outcomes between the mid-thoracic spine and the TLJ and the lumbar spine were considered. Results Altogether, 238 articles could be retrieved from the literature search. A total of 222 articles were excluded. Thus, 16 remaining original articles were included in this systematic review comprising the topics prevalence, bone mineral density and regional blood flow, biomechanics, subsequent fractures, and outcome, respectively. The overall level of evidence of the vast majority of studies was moderate to low. Conclusion Several differences between osteoporotic fractures of the mid-thoracic spine compared to the TLJ and the lumbar spine could be identified. Thereby, osteoporotic mid-thoracic fractures seem to be particularly more related to frailty without a history of traumatic injury compared to osteoporotic fractures of the TLJ and the lumbar spine. Additionally, the presence of severe mid-thoracic fractures predicts subsequent fractures of the hip. In contrast, subsequent fractures of the spine are less likely.

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: Postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) are an increasing challenge in the daily clinical routine. This review summarizes existing knowledge in the field of PSII, including definitions, epidemiology, classifications, risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Methods: A systematic review was performed using a structured PubMed analysis, based on the PRISMA criteria. The search terminology was set as: “spinal implant associated infection OR spinal implant infection OR spinal instrumentation infection OR peri spinal implant infection.” PubMed search was limited to the categories randomized controlled trials (RCT), clinical trials, meta-analysis and (systematic) reviews, whereas case reports were excluded. Studies from January 2000 to December 2020 were considered eligible. A total of 572 studies were identified, 82 references included for qualitative synthesis, and 19 for detailed sub analysis (12 meta-analysis, 7 prospective RCT). Results: Structural problems in the field of PSII were revealed, including (1) limited level of evidence in clinical studies (missing prospective RCT, metanalyzes), (2) small patient numbers, (3) missing standardized definitions, (4) heterogeneity in patient groups, and (5) redundancy in cited literature. Conclusion: Evidence-based knowledge about spinal implant-associated infections is lacking. All involved medical fields should come together to define the term PSII and to combine their approaches toward research, training, and patient care.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the addition of computed tomography (CT) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the accuracy of classifying osteoporotic vertebral body fractures (OVBF). Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective single-center database has been performed. All consecutive patients who had suffered an acute thoracolumbar OVBF in one level II spine center between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed. All fractures were initially classified by 5 board-certified orthopaedic surgeons based on MRI and conventional radiographs. Afterwards a reclassification including CT scans were performed. Differences in OF classification and OF score values between both measurements were analyzed.Results: A total of 61 patients were analyzed with a mean age 75.8 years (SD: 8.8 years). In 82.9% of the cases, there was no difference in OF classification comparing classification based only on MRI versus MRI+CT. A difference of more than two OF types was observed in less than 1% of all ratings. The inter-rater reliabilities of the OF classification based on CT+MRI and MRI alone were 0.63 and 0.49, respectively. In 97.5% of the cases there was no therapy-relevant difference of the treatment recommendation with respect of a surgical or nonoperative treatment recommendation based on the OF score.Conclusion: In terms of the OF classification and the OF score, the addition of CT add limited value compared to conventional radiographs and MRI only. Additionally, there is only a minor rate of disagreement in treatment recommendations as by the OF score when adding a CT.

Purpose The aim of this study was to give a systematic overview over the rate and location of concomitant injuries, the probability of suffering from neurological deficits, and to give evidence of the timing of surgery in severely injured patients with unstable thoracic vertebral body fractures. Methods This review is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search in the PubMed and Web of Science database for publications up to November 2020 dealing with unstable fractures of the mid-thoracic spine. Results Altogether, 1109 articles were retrieved from the literature search. A total of 1095 articles were excluded. Thus, 16 remaining original articles were included in this systematic review depicting the topics timing of surgery in polytraumatized patients, outcome neurologic deficits, and impact of concomitant injuries. The overall level of evidence of the vast majority of studies is low. Conclusion The evidence of the available literature is low. The cited studies reveal that thoracic spinal fractures are associated with a high number of neurological deficits and concomitant injuries, particularly of the thoracic cage and the lung. Thereby, diagnostic algorithm should include computer tomography of the whole thoracic cage if there is any clinical sign of concomitant injuries. Patients with incomplete neurologic deficits benefit from early surgery consisting of decompression and long-segmental stabilization.

Purpose Hemiarthroplasty is widely accepted as the treatment of choice in elderly patients with a displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture. Intraoperative greater trochanteric fractures thwart this successful procedure, resulting in prolonged recovery, inferior outcome, and increased risk of revision surgery. Hence, this study analyzed factors potentially associated with an increased risk for intraoperative greater trochanteric fracture. Methods This retrospective study included 512 hemiarthroplasties in 496 patients with a geriatric intracapsular femoral neck fracture from July 2010 to March 2020. All patients received the same implant type of which 90.4% were cemented and 9.6% non-cemented. Intra- and postoperative radiographs and reports were reviewed and particularly screened for greater trochanteric fractures. Results Female patients accounted for 74% and mean age of the patients was 82.3 (± 8.7) years. 34 (6.6%) intraoperative greater trochanteric fractures were identified. In relation to patient-specific factors, only a shorter prothrombin time was found to be significantly associated with increased risk of intraoperative greater trochanteric fracture (median 96%, IQR 82–106% vs. median 86.5%, IQR 68.8–101.5%; p = 0.046). Other factors associated with greater trochanteric fracture were a shorter preoperative waiting time and changes in perioperative settings. Outcome of patients with greater trochanteric fracture was worse with significantly more surgical site infection requiring revision surgery (17.6% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.005). Conclusion Prolonged prothrombin time, a shorter preoperative waiting time, and implementing new procedural standards and surgeons may be associated with an increased risk of a greater trochanteric fracture. Addressing these risk factors may reduce early periprosthetic infection which is strongly related to greater trochanteric fractures.

Purpose Fibular mobility after suture button stabilization (SBS) of inferior tibiofibular joint (syndesmosis) injuries has been described. This effect is called the “flexible nature of fixation (FNF).” In this study, we aimed to quantify FNF in syndesmotic stabilization. Methods Postoperative bilateral computed tomography (CT) of ankle fractures with syndesmosis stabilization by SBS or syndesmotic screw (SYS) was retrospectively analyzed. The transverse offset (TO) and vertical offset (VO) were defined by evaluating the drill channels. The reduction outcome was evaluated by the side-to-side difference between the clear space and the anterior tibiofibular distance (antTFD). The calculated anterior tibiofibular distance (cal-antTFD) was calculated by subtracting the TO from the validated antTFD. Subsequently, a reevaluation of the reduction outcomes after SYS or SBS stabilization was performed using cal-antTFD. Results Sixty patients (44 with SBS and 16 with SYS stabilization) were analyzed. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities for TO and VO were excellent (α > 0.92). SYS stabilization showed lower mean TO (− 0.02 mm; SD 0.14) and VO (0.11 mm; SD, 0.29 mm) than SBS stabilization (TO 1.16 mm, SD 1.4 mm; VO 0.2 mm, SD 0.8 mm; p = 0.001). The rate of malreduction according to cal-antTFD was higher than that of antFTD (p = 0.033). Conclusion The presented method, which evaluates the position of the tibial to the fibular drill channel, allowed the quantification of the “FNF.” The often described difference in the dynamic stabilization of SBS compared to the rigid stabilization by SYS could be objectified. Considering cal-antTFD illustrates that FNF potentially reduces the rate of malreduction in SBS stabilization.

Purpose To analyze the indications, radiological short-term outcomes, and complications of ankle fractures in geriatric patients treated with a triangular external fixator (AEF) until fracture healing. Furthermore, the effect of an additional osteosynthesis to AEF on the radiological outcome was investigated. Methods Retrospective analysis of ankle fractures treated in a Level I Trauma Center between 2005 and 2015 with an AEF in patients aged ≥ 65 years until fracture has healed. The combination of AEF and at least one additional osteosynthesis of a malleolus was defined as hybrid external fixator (HEF). At the time of AEF removal, a preserved ankle joint congruity was defined as good radiological outcome. Incongruity more than 2 mm was defined as poor radiologic results. Results 16 patients (13 women, 3 men) with a mean age of 74 years (SD 6.2) were treated with AEF until fracture healing, 9 with a single AEF and 7 with a HEF. Stabilization with HEF (n = 7 [100%]) showed higher rates of good radiological outcome than AEF alone (n = 4 [44%] of 9; p = 0.034). The duration of therapy did not differ between HEF and AEF (70 day vs 77 days). 4 patients (22%) required surgical revision. Conclusion It could be shown that osteosynthesis in addition to AEF leads to a better radiological short-term results than using AEF alone. Therefore, in the situation where an AEF is considered as the definitive treatment option for an ankle fracture in geriatric patients with expected or existing soft tissue problems, it should be done or completed as a HEF. Level of evidence Therapeutic level IV.

The prevalence of nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiskitis, associated with both a high morbidity and a high mortality, has increased in the last few decades. The diagnosis is often delayed because of the nonspecific clinical manifestation at the early stage. The reliability of radiographs is limited, particularly in early stage after the onset of infection. Computed tomography (CT) can reliably assess the bony condition with the possibility of spatial visualization. Contrast enhancement supports the detection of affected soft tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continues to be the gold standard in the diagnosis of spondylodiskitis. Sophisticated investigation protocols supported by gadolinium enhancement secure the diagnosis. MRI has a high resolution without radiation exposure. Different nuclear investigation techniques extend the diagnostic options. Reports of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET) are particularly promising to confirm the diagnosis. The drawback of the reduced image quality with respect to detailed anatomical information can be overcome by a combined simultaneous acquisition of CT or MRI. With respect to one of the greatest challenges, the differentiation between degenerative changes (Modic type 1) and infection at an early stage using differentiated MRI protocols and FDG-PET is promising. This overview presents a concise state-of-the-art look at radiologic investigations in case of suspected nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiskitis with the focus on a pragmatic approach.

The majority of traumatic vertebral fractures occur at the thoracolumbar junction and the lumbar spine and less commonly at the mid-thoracic and upper thoracic spine. In accordance, a high number of articles are dealing with thoracolumbar fractures focusing on the thoracolumbar junction. Nonetheless, the biomechanics of the thoracic spine differ from the thoracolumbar junction and the lumbar vertebral spine. The aim of this review is to screen the literature dealing with acute traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures in patients with normal bone quality. Thereby, the diagnostic of thoracic vertebral body fractures should include a CT examination. Ideally, the CT should include the whole thoracic cage particularly in patients suffering high energy accidents or in those with clinical suspicion of concomitant thoracic injuries. Generally, concomitant thoracic injuries are frequently seen in patients with thoracic spine fractures. Particularly sternal fractures cause an increase in fracture instability. In case of doubt, long segment stabilization is recommended in patients with unstable mid- und upper thoracic fractures, particularly in those patients with a high grade of instability.

Wirbelsaulenverletzungen im Kindesalter sind insgesamt sehr selten. Aktuelle einschlagige Studien mit grosen Fallzahlen, aus welchen sich evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Therapie von Wirbelsaulenverletzungen bei padiatrischen Patienten ableiten lassen, existieren nicht. Formulierung von Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Therapie von Verletzungen der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsaule im Kindesalter. Zunachst erfolgte eine Recherche von Primar-, aber auch Sekundarliteratur zum Themenkomplex Diagnostik und Therapie von Verletzungen der Wirbelsaule bei Kindern. Eine entsprechende interne Literaturdatenbank wurde angelegt und gepflegt. Im Zeitraum von April 2017 bis Dezember 2019 fanden sich die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Wirbelsaulentrauma im Kindesalter der Sektion Wirbelsaule der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie zu einem Konsensusprozess zusammen. In 9 Arbeitstreffen wurden systematisch Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Therapie von Verletzungen der Wirbelsaule bei Kindern formuliert. Es konnten Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Therapie von Verletzungen der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsaule fur 3 Altersstufen (Altersstufe I: 0 bis 6 Jahre; Altersstufe II: 7 bis 9 Jahre; Altersstufe III: 10 bi s16 Jahre) formuliert werden. Die Prinzipien der Diagnostik und Therapie aus der Erwachsenenmedizin konnen nicht problemlos ubertragen werden. Wirbelsaulenverletzungen im Kindesalter sind selten und sollten der Behandlung in geeigneten Zentren zugefuhrt werden. Die MRT-Diagnostik sollte beim kardiopulmonal stabilen Kind mit Verdacht auf ein Monotrauma der Wirbelsaule als initiale Bildgebung indiziert werden. Die grundlegenden Therapieziele bei Verletzungen der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsaule im Kindesalter sind die Wiederherstellung der Stabilitat, der Schutz der neurogenen Strukturen und das Wiederherstellen der anatomisch korrekten Verhaltnisse. Bei der Indikationsstellung zur konservativen vs. operativen Therapie mussen das Korrektur- und Regenerationspotenzial der einzelnen Wirbelsaulenabschnitte in Abhangigkeit vom Patientenalter berucksichtigt werden. Die operative Stabilisierung soll v. a. uber minimalinvasive Techniken, im Sinne einer Instrumentierung ohne Spondylodese und fruhzeitiger Metallentfernung, erfolgen.

Generell stellen Wirbelsaulenverletzungen bei Kindern im Alter unter 16 Jahren eine seltene Verletzungsentitat dar. Fur Deutschland liegen keine belastbaren Daten bezuglich der Epidemiologie von Verletzungen der Wirbelsaule im Kindesalter vor. Gerade bei padiatrischen Patienten, bei denen sowohl die Anamnese, die klinische Untersuchung, aber auch die Durchfuhrung der bildgebenden Diagnostik haufig erschwert sind, mussen samtliche Hinweise auf eine Verletzung der Wirbelsaule mitberucksichtigt werden. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war die Bereitstellung epidemiologischer Daten von padiatrischen Patienten mit Wirbelsaulenverletzungen in Deutschland, um diese zukunftig in die Entscheidungsfindung bei der Diagnostik und Therapie dieser Patienten einfliesen lassen zu konnen. Im Rahmen einer nationalen Multizenterstudie wurden retrospektiv Patientendaten innerhalb eines Zeitraums von 7 Jahren aus 6 Wirbelsaulenzentren erhoben. Neben den demografischen Daten wurden der Unfallmechanismus, die betroffene Wirbelsaulenregion und auch die Begleitverletzungen erhoben. Zudem erfolgte die Erfassung der bildgebenden Diagnostik sowie der jeweiligen Therapie. Es konnten 367 Kinder (weiblich: mannlich = 1:1,2) mit insgesamt 610 Verletzungen an der Wirbelsaule in die Studie eingeschlossen werden. Das mittlere Alter betrug 12 (±3,5) Jahre. Die haufigsten Unfallmechanismen in allen Altersgruppen waren ein Sturz aus unter 3 m Hohe sowie Verkehrsunfalle. Die bildgebende Diagnostik musste nur in Ausnahmefallen in Narkose durchgefuhrt werden. Wahrend jungere Kinder (0 bis 9 Jahre) eher Verletzungen im Bereich der Halswirbelsaule erlitten, zeigten sich Verletzungen der thorakolumbalen Wirbelsaule eher bei Kindern >10 Jahren. Die Kinder wiesen haufige Begleitverletzungen an Kopf und Extremitaten auf. Im Bereich der Wirbelsaule befanden sich weitere Verletzungen meist benachbart und nur selten in anderen Regionen. Rund 75 % der Kinder wurden konservativ behandelt. Die Ergebnisse unterscheiden sich von den Erkenntnissen aus der Erwachsenenmedizin und beschreiben spezielle Gegebenheiten fur padiatrische Patienten mit Wirbelsaulenverletzungen. Trotz gewisser Limitationen konnen sie so bei der Entscheidungsfindung uber die durchzufuhrende Diagnostik und Therapie dieser Patienten helfen.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Spondylodiszitis ist eine seltene Erkrankung mit steigender Inzidenz. Methodik In dieser retrospektiven Studie wurden 112 Patienten mit operativ versorgter Spondylodiszitis vom 01.01.2005 bis 31.12.2012 in einem Level-I-Wirbelsäulenzentrum hinsichtlich potenzieller prognostischer Kriterien nachuntersucht. Als Nachuntersuchungszeitraum galt der stationäre Aufenthalt. Analysiert wurden die Parameter Mortalität, Alter, Lokalisation der Spondylodiszitis, Abszess- und Erregernachweise, neurologischer Status und Body-Mass-Index (BMI). Ergebnisse Das Durchschnittsalter lag bei 68,3 Jahren (±12,9). Insgesamt sind 12 Patienten (10,7 %) während des stationären Aufenthalts verstorben. Ältere Patienten wiesen eine signifikant höhere Krankenhausmortalitätsrate auf (p = 0,008). Der Abszessnachweis gelang in 49,1 % der Fälle und ging mit signifikant längerer Liegedauer im Krankenhaus (p = 0,001) und auf der ITS (p = 0,001) sowie häufigeren Revisionen (p = 0,018) einher. Außerdem wiesen adipöse Patienten signifikant häufiger einen Abszess auf (p = 0,034). Mit S. aureus als häufigstem Erreger gelang der Keimnachweis insgesamt in 60,7 % der Fälle. Ein Keimnachweis war mit einer signifikant längeren Krankenhausliegedauer (p = 0,006) und häufigeren intensivmedizinischen Überwachungen verbunden (p = 0,017). Patienten mit einer Nephropathie wiesen eine signifikant erhöhte Mortalität, eine längere Liegedauer im Krankenhaus sowie ein gehäuftes Auftreten von Mehretagenbefällen auf. Schlussfolgerung Das hohe Alter, die positive Keimkultur, die Niereninsuffizienz und Abszesse können als prognostische Kriterien genutzt werden. Zu den Risikofaktoren für das Vorhandensein eines Abszesses können die lumbale Lokalisation der Spondylodiszitis, die Nephropathie sowie der Nachweis eines Erregers und die Adipositas gezählt werden.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to gain new insights into the epidemiologic characteristics of patients with atlas fractures and to retrospectively evaluate complication rates after surgical and non-surgical treatment. Methods In a retrospective study, consecutive patients diagnosed with a fracture of the atlas between 01/2008 and 07/2018 were analyzed. Data on epidemiology, concomitant injuries, fracture patterns and complications were obtained by chart and imaging review. Results In total, 189 patients (mean age 72 years, SD 19; 57.1% male) were treated. The most frequent trauma mechanism was a low-energy trauma (59.8%). A concomitant injury of the cervical spine was found in 59.8%, a combined C1/C2 injury in 56.6% and a concomitant fracture of the thoraco-lumbar spine in 15.4%. When classified according to Gehweiler, there were: 23.3% type 1, 22.2% type 2, 32.8% type 3, 19.0% type 4 and 1.1% type 5. Treatment of isolated atlas fractures (n = 67) consisted of non-operative management in 67.1%, halo fixation in 6.0% and open surgical treatment in 26.9%. In patients with combined injuries, the therapy was essentially dictated by the concomitant subaxial cervical injuries. Conclusions Atlas fractures occurred mainly in elderly people and in the majority of the cases were associated with other injuries of the head and spine. Most atlas fractures were treated conservatively. However, surgical treatment has become a safe and valid option in unstable fracture patterns involving the anterior and posterior arch (type 3) or those involving the articular surfaces (type 4). Level of evidence IV (Retrospective cohort study). Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures in Europe is 18–26%. Although most of these injuries can be treated conservatively, the underlying concepts have not been defined clearly or uniformly. In this article, we present the current state of the evidence on the diagnosis and conservative treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature up to May 2020 was carried out in the PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection databases. 549 articles were identified, of which 36 were suitable for inclusion in the review. Articles were sought in the areas of diagnosis, provision of physical aids, pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy, and treatments from the realm of alternative medicine. RESULTS: The primary diagnostic technique was conventional x-ray in two planes (with the patient standing, if possible), which had 51.3% sensitivity and 75% specificity. If a fracture was suspected, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the entire spine and regional computed tomography (CT) were carried out. The overall state of the evidence on treatment is poor; the best available evidence is for exercise therapy and physiotherapy, which are supported by three level I and four level II studies. Improvements were seen mainly in mobility and a reduced fear of falling. The use of an active orthosis can be useful as well. No evidence was found on the use of drugs or alternative medicine exclusively in the conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. CONCLUSION: It is reasonable to evaluate instability with imaging repeatedly, at regular intervals, over a period of six months. There is still a lack of reliable data on the optimal intensity and duration of physiotherapy, and on the use of orthoses.

Purpose This study aims primarily to investigate the outcome following surgical management of pertrochanteric fractures of patients over 90 years compared to the outcome of a control group below 90 years under special consideration of the timing of surgery. The second aim was to analyze potential risk factors for early deaths in very old patients. This study allows us to draw conclusions to minimize complications linked to this particular age segment. Methods The study group consisted of very old patients aged 90 years and older. Geriatric patients aged between 60 and 89 years of age were part of the control group. Type A1 pertrochanteric fractures were typically treated by dynamic hip crews, type A2 and A3 fractures by femoral nails. Full weight bearing physiotherapy was initiated on the day after surgery to improve mobility and muscle strength. Results A total of 71 patients belonged to the study group (mean age: 92.5 years ±2.3 years), whereas 223 patients formed the control group (mean age: 79.9 ± 7.4 years). The mortality rate and the number of detected and documented complications were significantly higher in the study group (p = 0.001; p = 0.009, respectively). Despite the significantly higher complication rate in the > 90-year-old patients, there was no significant difference in the mean length of in-hospital-stay between the both groups (> 90 yrs.: 12.1d; Conclusion The number of co-morbidities, number of daily-administered medications and the time between admission and surgery have no impact on the outcome. We noticed a longer period between admission and surgery in very old patients who survived. Patients with pertrochanteric fractures should be screened for multimorbidity and cognitive disorders in a standardized manner.

An increasing incidence of sacral insufficiency fractures in geriatric patients has been documented, representing a major challenge to our healthcare system. Determining the accurate diagnosis requires the use of sectional imaging, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Initially, non-surgical treatment is indicated for the majority of patients. If non-surgical treatment fails, several minimally invasive therapeutic strategies can be used, which have shown promising results in small case series. These approaches are sacroplasty, percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation (S1 with or without S2), trans-sacral screw fixation or implantation of a trans-sacral bar, transiliac internal fixator stabilisation, and spinopelvic stabilisation. These surgical strategies and their indications are reported in detail. Generally, treatment-related decision making depends on the clinical presentation, fracture morphology, and attending surgeon's experience.Insuffizienzfrakturen des hinteren Beckenrings nehmen an Häufigkeit zu und stellen eine relevante Herausforderung für unser Gesundheitssystem dar. Zur Sicherung der Diagnose sollte ergänzend zu den konventionellen Röntgenaufnahmen eine Computertomografie und ggf. eine Magnetresonanztomografie erfolgen. Bei Versagen konservativer Therapieregime zeigen kleinere Serien minimalinvasiver operativer Therapieansätze vielversprechende Ergebnisse. Ziel dieser Übersichtsarbeit ist es, die aktuell eingesetzten Techniken der minimalinvasiven operativen Versorgung von Insuffizienzfrakturen des Sakrums aufzuführen und die jeweiligen Vor- und Nachteile darzulegen. Dies sind aktuell die Sakroplastie, die perkutane iliosakrale Verschraubung S I oder S I/S II, die transsakrale Verschraubung u. a. mithilfe des transsakralen „bar“ und von posterior horizontalen sowie lumbopelvinen Stabilisierungen. Im Allgemeinen hängt die Entscheidungsfindung zur Therapie vom klinischen Erscheinungsbild, der Frakturmorphologie und den Erfahrungen der behandelnden Chirurgen ab.

The application of the Halo fixateur in case of spinal pathologies in childhood is a standardized technique. The halo fixateur may be used for treatment of injuries of the cervical spine, for additional stabilization following extended surgery at the cervical spine and their transitional regions as well as to achieve preoperative reduction in case of severe and rigid deformity. These indications are, referred to the early age, rare. However, the successful use of the Halo fixateur presumes a certain familiarity with the device and experiences regarding the underlying diseases to minimize related risks and to avoid possible complications. In this article the use and specific features regarding the application of the halo fixateur in childhood based on presented cases and the literature will be discussed.Die Anwendung des Halofixateurs ist bei Erkrankungen und Verletzungen der Wirbelsäule im Kindesalter auch heute noch ein Standardverfahren. Zur Anwendung kommt das Verfahren bei verschiedenen Indikationen. Dazu gehören der Einsatz bei Verletzungen der Halswirbelsäule (HWS), der Einsatz als additives Fixationssystem nach komplexer zervikaler Chirurgie und ihrer Übergangsregionen sowie der Einsatz zur präoperativen Traktion ausgeprägter und rigider Deformitäten. Diese Indikationen sind, bezogen auf das Kindesalter, insgesamt eher selten. Die erfolgreiche Anwendung des Halofixateursystems setzt jedoch eine gewisse Vertrautheit mit dem System und vor allem Erfahrungen mit den zugrunde liegenden Krankheitsbildern voraus, gerade auch, um immanente Risiken zu minimieren und Komplikationen zu vermeiden. Im folgenden Artikel soll auf die Anwendung und Besonderheiten des Halofixateurs im Kindesalter bei den o. g. Indikationsgruppen eingegangen und dies anhand von Beispielen und der Literatur diskutiert werden.

Odontoid fractures in geriatric patients represent an entity of increasing incidence with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management is being controversially discussed in the literature.In a consensus process and based on the current literature, the members of the working groups "Osteoporotic Fractures" and "Upper Cervical Spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) defined recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients.For the diagnosis of odontoid fractures in symptomatic patients, computed tomography represents the gold standard, along with conventional radiographs. Magnetic resonance and dynamic imaging can be used as ancillary imaging modalities. With regard to fracture classification, the systems described by Anderson/D'Alonzo and by Eysel/Roosen have proved to be of value. A treatment algorithm was developed based on these classifications. Anderson/D'Alonzo type 1, type 3, and non-displaced type 2 fractures usually can be treated non-operatively. However, a close clinical and radiological follow-up is essential. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, operative treatment is associated with better fracture healing. Displaced type 2 and type 3 fractures should be stabilized operatively. Type 2 fractures with suitable fracture patterns (Eysel/Roosen 2A/B) can be stabilized anteriorly. Posterior C I/II-stabilization procedures are well established and suitable for all fracture patterns.Frakturen des Dens axis beim geriatrischen Patienten stellen eine wachsende Entität mit hoher Morbidität und Mortalität dar. Die optimale Diagnostik und Behandlung der Verletzung in diesem Patientenkollektiv werden in der Literatur kontrovers diskutiert.In einem gemeinsamen Konsensusprozess erstellten die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft „Osteoporotische Frakturen“ und der Arbeitsgemeinschaft „Obere Halswirbelsäule“ der Sektion Wirbelsäule der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DGOU) unter Berücksichtigung aktueller Literatur Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Behandlung von Frakturen des Dens axis bei geriatrischen Patienten.In der Diagnostik der Densfrakturen stellt beim symptomatischen Patienten neben der konventionellen Bildgebung die Computertomografie den Goldstandard dar. Kernspintomografie und Funktionsaufnahmen können ergänzende Informationen liefern. Zur Klassifikation haben sich die Systeme nach Anderson/DʼAlonzo und Eysel/Roosen bewährt. Anhand der genannten Klassifikationen wurde ein Behandlungsalgorithmus entwickelt: Anderson/DʼAlonzo Typ 1, Typ 3 und nicht dislozierte Frakturen vom Typ 2 können i. d. R. unter engmaschigen Verlaufskontrollen konservativ behandelt werden. Bei Frakturen vom Typ 2 nach Anderson/DʼAlonzo bietet die operative Behandlung den Vorteil höherer knöcherner Heilungsraten. Dislozierte Typ-2- und Typ-3-Frakturen sollten operativ stabilisiert werden. Bei geeignetem Frakturverlauf (Eysel/Roosen 2A/B) sind anteriore Verfahren möglich. Posteriore Verfahren zur C I/II-Stabilisation sind etabliert und bei allen Frakturtypen durchführbar.

Introduction Incongruent stabilization of the distal tibiofibular joint (syndesmosis) results in poorer long-term outcome in malleolar fractures. The aim was to analyze whether the orientation of the syndesmotic stabilization would affect the immediate reduction imaged in computed tomography (CT). Materials and methods The syndesmotic congruity in 114 ankle fractures with stabilization of the syndesmosis were retrospectively analyzed in the post-operative bilateral CT scans. The incisura device angle (IDA) was defined and correlated with the side-to-side difference of Leporjärvi clear-space (ΔLCS), anterior tibiofibular distance (ΔantTFD) and Nault talar dome angle (ΔNTDA) regardless of the stabilization technique and separately for suture button system and syndesmotic screw. Asymmetric reduction was defined as ΔLCS > 2 mm and |ΔantTFD|> 2 mm. Results Regardless of the stabilization technique, no correlation between the IDA and the ΔLCS (r = 0.069), the ΔantTFD (r = 0.019) nor the ΔNTDA (r = 0.177) could be observed. There were no differences between suture button system and syndesmotic screw. Asymmetrical reduction was detected in 46% of the cases, while sagittal asymmetry was most common. No association was found between the orientation of stabilization device and occurrence of asymmetrical reduction (p > 0.05). The results of suture button system and syndesmotic screw were comparable in this respect (p > 0.05). Conclusion Poor correlation between the orientation of the stabilization device and the immediate post-operative congruity of the syndesmosis could be shown. In contrast to current literature, this study did not show difference of suture button system over syndesmotic screw in this regard. Careful adjustment of the fibula in anteroposterior orientation should be given special attention.

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: Osteoporosis is one of the most common diseases of the elderly, whereby vertebral body fractures are in many cases the first manifestation. Even today, the consequences for patients are underestimated. Therefore, early identification of therapy failures is essential. In this context, the aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the current literature with respect to clinical and radiographic findings that might predict treatment failure. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) checklist and algorithm. Results: After the literature search, 724 potentially eligible investigations were identified. In total, 24 studies with 3044 participants and a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 6-27.5 months) were included. Patient-specific risk factors were age >73 years, bone mineral density with a t-score 23 and a modified frailty index >2.5. The following radiological and fracture-specific risk factors could be identified: involvement of the posterior wall, initial height loss, midportion type fracture, development of an intravertebral cleft, fracture at the thoracolumbar junction, fracture involvement of both endplates, different morphological types of fractures, and specific MRI findings. Further, a correlation between sagittal spinal imbalance and treatment failure could be demonstrated. Conclusion: In conclusion, this systematic review identified various factors that predict treatment failure in conservatively treated osteoporotic fractures. In these cases, additional treatment options and surgical treatment strategies should be considered in addition to follow-up examinations.

Background: The evidence for the treatment of midthoracic fractures in elderly patients is weak. The aim of this study was to evaluate midterm results after posterior stabilization of unstable midthoracic fractures in the elderly.Methods: Retrospectively, all patients aged ≥65 suffering from an acute unstable midthoracic fracture treated with posterior stabilization were included. Trauma mechanism, ASA score, concomitant injuries, ODI score and radiographic loss of reduction were evaluated. Posterior stabilization strategy was divided into short-segmental stabilization (SSS) and long-segmental stabilization (LSS). Results: Fifty-nine patients (76.9 ± 6.3 years; 51% female) were included. The fracture was caused by a low-energy trauma mechanism in 22 patients (35.6%). Twenty-one patients died during the follow-up period (35.6%). Remaining patients (n=38) were followed up after a mean of 60 months. Patients who died were significantly older (p = 0.01) and had significantly higher ASA scores (p = 0.02). Adjacent thoracic cage fractures had no effect on mortality or outcome scores. A total of 12 sequential vertebral fractures occurred (35.3%). The mean ODI at the latest follow up was 31.3 ± 24.7, the mean regional sagittal loss of reduction was 5.1° (± 4.0). Patients treated with LSS had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral fractures during follow-up (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Unstable fractures of the midthoracic are associated with high rates of thoracic cage injuries. The mortality rate was rather high. The majority of the survivors had minimal to moderate disabilities. Thereby, patients treated with LSS had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral body fractures during follow-up.

Die minimal-invasive Stabilisation thorakolumbaler osteoporotischer Frakturen (OF) bei Patienten ohne neurologisches Defizit hat sich weitestgehend etabliert. Verschiedene dorsale und ventrale Techniken stehen zur Verfugung. Die OF-Klassifikation und der OF-Score stellen Hilfen bei der Indikation und Auswahl der operativen Technik dar. Die Arbeit gibt einen Uberblick uber die minimal-invasiven Stabilisationstechniken sowie uber deren Komplikationen und Ergebnisse. Selektive Literaturrecherche und Beschreibung der operativen Techniken. Die alleinige Wirbelkorperaugmentation kann bei schmerzhaften, aber stabilen Frakturen der Typen OF 1 und 2, seltener bei Typ OF 3 indiziert sein. Die Kyphoplastie stellt ein gut untersuchtes, effektives und sicheres Verfahren dar. Instabile Frakturen und kyphotische Fehlstellungen (Typen OF 3–5) sollten perkutan dorsal stabilisiert werden. Die Lange des Konstrukts richtet sich nach dem Grad der Instabilitat und der Fehlstellung. Die Zementaugmentation der Schrauben kann bei ausgepragter Osteoporose indiziert sein, erhoht jedoch die Komplikationsrate. Die Wiederherstellung der Stabilitat der ventralen Saule kann uber eine Wirbelkorperaugmentation, seltener uber eine minimal-invasive ventrale Stabilisation erfolgen. Die klinisch-radiologischen kurz- und mittelfristigen Ergebnisse der Stabilisationstechniken sind gut, jedoch steigt mit zunehmender Invasivitat auch die Komplikationsrate an. Die minimal-invasiven Stabilisationstechniken sind sicher und effektiv. Die Indikationen fur die einzelnen Verfahren richten sich nach der OF-Klasse und der individuellen klinischen Situation des Patienten.

Purpose The aim of this review is to systematically screen the literature for clinical and biomechanical studies dealing with posterior stabilization of acute traumatic mid-thoracic vertebral fractures in patients with normal bone quality. Methods This review is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search in the PubMed and Web of Science database for publications up to December 2018 dealing with the posterior stabilization of fractures of the mid-thoracic spine. Results Altogether, 1012 articles were retrieved from the literature search. A total of 960 articles were excluded. A total of 16 articles were dealing with the timing of surgery in polytraumatized patients, patients suffering of neurologic deficits after midthoracic fractures, and the impact of concomitant thoracic injuries and were excluded. Thus, 36 remaining original articles were included in this systematic review depicting the topics biomechanics, screw insertion, and outcome after posterior stabilization. The overall level of evidence of the vast majority of studies is low. Conclusion High quality studies are lacking. Long-segmental stabilization is indicated in unstable midthoracic fractures with concomitant sternal fractures. Generally, long-segmental constructs seem to be the safer treatment strategy considering the relative high penetration rate of pedicle screws in this region. Thereby, navigated insertion techniques and intraoperative 3D-imaging help to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy.

Background Minimally invasive, thoracoscopic anterior spondylodesis (MIAS) is an established treatment for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Good restoration of the local sagittal alignment and good functional results have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of MIAS in patients with incomplete burst fractures and to analyze the influence on global sagittal alignment, clinical outcomes, and adjacent segment degeneration. Methods From 2002 to 2003, 18 patients were treated with MIAS for incomplete thoracolumbar burst fractures. Mono-segmental spondylodesis was performed with an iliac crest bone graft and bisegmental spondylodesis with a titanium cage. In this single-center prospective cohort study, 15 patients were available for follow-up (FU) after an average of 12.9 years (12.1–14.4). Seven patients were treated with a combined anterior and posterior instrumentation and eight patients with anterior spondylodesis only. The primary clinical outcome parameter was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); secondary parameters were the Short Form 36 (SF36) and the visual analog scale (VAS spine). Full spine radiographs were assessed for bisegmental Cobb angle, alignment parameters, and signs of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Results ODI evaluation showed a mean impairment of 11.7% with minimal limitations in 13 patients. Neither a significant deterioration over time nor significant differences between both therapy strategies were found in the clinical scores at the latest follow-up. The mean bisegmental increase of regional malalignment of reduction was 8.8° (± 7.3°) with no significant correlation to any clinical outcome scores. The majority of patients had no signs of adjacent segment degeneration. Two patients showed minor radiologic changes. All patients had a balanced sagittal spine profile. Conclusions In conclusion, MIAS leads to good clinical results with—in majority—minimal spine-related impairment at the latest follow-up. No significant deterioration at 12-year FU was detectable compared to the 6-year results for the SF36 and VAS spine scores. There was no association between sagittal alignment, clinical outcome scores, and ASD. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (Nr.00015656).

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery 48(1), 601-611 (2022). doi:10.1007/s00068-020-01494-y, Published by Springer Medizin, Heidelberg

Objective To compare the construct stability of long-segmental dorsal stabilization in unstable midthoracic osteoporotic fracture situation with complete pedicle screw cement augmentation (ComPSCA) versus restricted pedicle screw cement augmentation (ResPSCA) of the most cranial and caudal pedicle screws. Methods Twelve fresh frozen human cadaveric specimens (Th 4–Th 10) aged 65 years and older were tested in a biomechanical cadaver study. All specimens received a dual-energy X-ray absorption scan and computed tomography scan before testing. Standardized long segmental stabilization was performed. All specimens were matched into pairs. These pairs were randomized into the groups with ComPSCA and ResPSCA. An unstable Th7 fracture was simulated. The maximum load was tested with 6 mm/min until failure or 20 mm had been reached. After testing, a computed tomography scan was performed. Results The mean age of the specimens was 87.8 years (range 74–101 years). The mean t score was –3.6 (range –1.2 to –5.3). The mean maximum force in the ResPSCA group was 1600 N (range 1119–1880 N) and 1941 N (1183–3761 N) in the ComPSCA group. No statistically significant differences between both study groups (P = 1.0) could be seen. No signs of screw loosening were visible. Conclusions No statistically significant differences in the maximum loads could be seen. No screw loosening of the non-cemented screws was visible. Thus, the construct stability of long segmental posterior stabilization of an unstable midthoracic fracture using ResPSCA seems to be comparable with ComPSCA under axial compression.

To define a new parameter in CT that could make imaging of the contralateral ankle dispensable evaluating the position of the fibula after syndesmotic injury. Thirty bilateral CTs of 30 patients were included. Five parameters were defined in axial CT for the injured (_inju) and uninjured (_unin) ankle. Reproducibility was examined for inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. Comparisons for all parameters were performed between the CT scans of both ankles. All measurements had a high agreement for the inter-observer and intra-observer correlation coefficients. A large interindividual variance could be found between all parameters. If the difference of the anterior tibiofibular distance antTFD_unin and antTFD_inju was less than 2 mm, there was a strong significant pairwise correlation between all parameters between both sides. Bilateral CT is still to be recommended, as it is the only way to exactly assess anterior posterior reduction of the fibula.

Background The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare treatment strategies of two level-one trauma centers regarding clinical and radiological outcomes focusing on non-osteoporotic AOSpine type A3 fractures of the thoracolumbar spine at levels T11 to L2. Methods Eighty-seven patients between 18 and 65 years of age that were treated operatively in either of two trauma centers were included. One treatment strategy includes open posterior stabilization whereas the other uses percutaneous posterior stabilization. Both included additional anterior fusion if necessary. Demographic data, McCormack classification, duration of surgery, hospital stay and further parameters were assessed. Owestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and SF-36 were measured for functional outcome. Bisegmental kyphosis angle, reduction loss and sagittal alignment parameters were assessed for radiological outcome. Follow up was at least 24 months. Results There was no significant difference regarding our primary functional outcome parameter (ODI) between both groups. Regarding radiological outcome kyphosis angle at time of follow up did not show a significant difference. Reduction loss at time of follow up was moderate in both groups with a significantly lower rate in the percutaneously stabilized group. Surgery time was significantly shorter for posterior stabilization and anterior fusion in the percutaneous group. Time of hospital stay was equal for posterior stabilization but shorter for anterior fusion in the open stabilized group. Conclusion Both treatment strategies are safe and effective showing only minor loss of reduction. Clinical relevant differences in functional and radiographic outcome between the two surgical groups could not be demonstrated. Trial registration It was conducted according to ICMJE guidelines and has been retrospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Registry (identification number: DRKS00015693, 07.11.2018).

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study.The purpose of this study was to examine whether Hounsfield units (HUs), as an alternative bone mineral density measurement to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography, which lead to additional radiation exposure for patients, has an effect on the maintenance of reduction in bisegmental Cobb angle (CA) and cage subsidence in patients who receive bisegmental spine stabilization after traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures.A total of 81 patients with a mean follow-up of 12 months were analyzed. CAs and cage subsidence were measured intraoperatively and at follow-up. HU was measured, and patients were subsequently assigned based on HU to three HU subgroups (group 1: HU 110 [poor bone quality (BQ)]; group 2: HU 180-110 [diminished BQ]; group 3: HU 180 [good BQ]).Following anterior stabilization, loss of reduction and cage subsidence differed between patients with poor and diminished BQ but not significantly, and both groups showed significantly more loss of reduction and cage subsidence than patients with good BQ.BQ, estimated with HU, had significant effects on cage subsidence and loss of reduction. We recommend measuring HU before surgery and applying additional treatment strategies, such as polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of endplates or anterior plates, for patients with HU 180. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Study Design: Abstract consensus paper with systematic literature review. Objective: The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures based on systematic review of current literature and consensus of several spine surgery experts. Methods: The project was initiated in September 2008 and published in Germany in 2011. It was redone in 2017 based on systematic literature review, including new AOSpine classification. Members of the expert group were recruited from all over Germany working in hospitals of all levels of care. In total, the consensus process included 9 meetings and 20 hours of video conferences. Results: As regards existing studies with highest level of evidence, a clear recommendation regarding treatment (operative vs conservative) or regarding type of surgery (posterior vs anterior vs combined anterior-posterior) cannot be given. Treatment has to be indicated individually based on clinical presentation, general condition of the patient, and radiological parameters. The following specific parameters have to be regarded and are proposed as morphological modifiers in addition to AOSpine classification: sagittal and coronal alignment of spine, degree of vertebral body destruction, stenosis of spinal canal, and intervertebral disc lesion. Meanwhile, the recommendations are used as standard algorithm in many German spine clinics and trauma centers. Conclusion: Clinical presentation and general condition of the patient are basic requirements for decision making. Additionally, treatment recommendations offer the physician a standardized, reproducible, and in Germany commonly accepted algorithm based on AOSpine classification and 4 morphological modifiers.

ZusammenfassungVersorgungspflichtige osteoporotische Wirbelkörperfrakturen stellen heutzutage mehr denn je eine Herausforderung an Behandler und Gesellschaft dar. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden Lösungsansätze und Möglichkeiten zur Optimierung der Implantatstabilität bei osteoporotischen Frakturen aufgezeigt und mit einigen Beispielen illustriert.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors of accompanied C1 fractures in elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures (OF) and to analyze the complication rate and the outcomes of patients after combined anterior odontoid and transarticular C1/2 screw fixation (AOTAF). The study represents a retrospective case series at a single level-1 trauma center. All elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with acute combination injuries (CI) including type II OF with an accompanied C1 fracture, who were treated by an anterior approach, were included. All postoperative complications were analyzed based on the patient notes. Clinical and radiological controls were performed after 1 year. Main parameters of interest were 1-year mortality rate, pain level, and satisfaction rate after 1 year. A total of 23 patients were included. The average age was 84.6 years (range 73–94 years). All patients had atlanto-odontoid osteoarthritis (AOO) and all but two patients were injured by low-energy falls. Dysphagia was the most common postoperative complication (26.1%). Surgical revision was necessary in one of these patients due to hematoma. Dysphagia improved in all patients considerably. Loss of follow-up was 21.7%. The 1-year mortality was 21.7% (n = 5). The mean pain level and satisfaction rate was 2.5 (± 0.9) and 7.3 (± 0.7), respectively. After 1 year, no signs of non-union were visible. AOO was observed in all patients with CI. The main cause of trauma was a low-energy fall. The pain levels were low to moderate and satisfaction levels were promising 1 year after surgery. Nonetheless, AOTAF is associated with a high rate of postoperative dysphagia, which resolves in the majority of patients due to conservative management.

Fractures of the os sacrum without relevant trauma history are defined as stress or insufficiency fractures and often affect the anterior pelvis. Sacral insufficiency fractures are associated with osteoporosis and occur under physiological load. In contrast, sacral stress fractures are caused by mechanical overloading. Diagnostic confirmation is delayed in many of these patients. Thus, MRI and/or CT should be performed early. Fracture stability should be evaluated by CT. MRI is the better approach to rule out fractures and is highly sensitive. It is indicated in young patients and in patients with non-specific lumbosacral pain. Nuclear imaging techniques are viable alternatives in patients with a contraindication for MRI.Sakrumfrakturen, die ohne adäquates Trauma entstanden sind, werden in Insuffizienzfrakturen und Stressfrakturen eingeteilt. Während Insuffizienzfrakturen bei physiologischer Belastung meist auf dem Boden einer relevanten Osteoporose entstehen, beruhen Stressfrakturen auf einer mechanischen Überlastung. Der vordere Beckenring ist regelmäßig beteiligt. Aufgrund des fehlenden bzw. niederenergetischen Unfallhergangs wird die korrekte Diagnose oft verspätet gestellt. Demzufolge war es das Ziel der AG Osteoporotische Frakturen der Sektion Wirbelsäule der DGOU, die einzelnen bildgebenden Verfahren zur korrekten, schnellen und kosteneffektiven Diagnostik vorzustellen. Zur Diagnosesicherung sollte neben der konventionell radiologischen Diagnostik zeitnah eine Schnittbildgebung in die Wege geleitet werden. Mittels CT kann die Frakturmorphologie am besten beurteilt werden, wodurch potenzielle Instabilitätszeichen der Verletzung erkannt werden können. Die MRT kann aufgrund der hohen Sensitivität bei fehlendem Frakturnachweis im CT, bei jungen Patienten und unklaren Situationen zusätzliche wichtige Informationen liefern. Im Falle einer Kontraindikation für das MRT stellen nuklearmedizinische Untersuchungen eine gute Alternative dar.

Surgical treatment of unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine in the elderly population is highly variable with combined posterior and anterior stabilization (CPAS) and posterior augmented stabilization with cementation of the vertebral body (hybrid) being two commonly used techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of CPAS versus hybrid stabilization for the treatment of unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine in patients aged between 60 and 70 years. A retrospective analysis was performed of all thoracolumbar burst fractures treated surgically in a single level I trauma center between June 2013 and February 2015. Two commonly used strategies of surgical stabilization were compared; the first consisted of initial posterior reduction and bisegmental stabilization, followed by additional anterior spondylodesis (CPAS); the second method comprised a hybrid technique with a posterior cement augmented bisegmental minimally invasive stabilization and kyphoplasty of the fractured vertebral body. Patients were evaluated clinically after a minimum follow-up of 18 months. The primary endpoint was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the latest follow-up. Secondary parameters of interest were length of in-hospital stay (LIHS), duration of surgery (DS), surgical revisions (SR), pain level (P-VAS), satisfaction level and the SF-36 score (PSC, MSC), the bisegmental postoperative Cobb angle, the reduction loss (RL), and all alignment parameters (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, C7 plumb line). A total of 29 patients were included (17 females, 12 males, mean age 65.6 years ± 3.4 years). The following vertebral bodies were fractured: thoracic level (T) 12: n = 6; lumbar (L) 1: n = 14; L 2: n = 6; L 3: n = 3. CPAS was performed in 10 patients (34%), whereas the hybrid was carried out in 19 patients (66%). There were no statistical significant differences between both study groups regarding age, gender, trauma energy, fracture level, and fracture morphology. The latest follow-up was performed after a mean of 27 months (range 18–53 months). The LIHS between the treatment methods was statistically significant (p

ZusammenfassungDensfrakturen sind nach Unfällen relativ häufig nachweisbar, insbesondere beim alten Menschen. Während Densfrakturen vom Typ Anderson I und III meist stabil sind und gut auf eine konservative Therapie ansprechen, kommt es bei Typ-II-Frakturen nach Anderson nach konservativer Therapie häufig zu Pseudarthrosen. Dementsprechend werden diese Verletzungen mehrheitlich operativ versorgt. Eine gelenkerhaltende Versorgung ohne permanente oder temporäre C I/II-Fixierung ist nur von ventral möglich und bietet sich insbesondere bei Patienten ohne relevante C I/II-Arthrose an. Klassischerweise erfolgt dies über eine ventrale Zugschraubenosteosynthese mittels 1 oder 2 Schrauben. Bei relevanter C I/II-Arthrose ist eine zusätzliche atlantoaxiale Fixation im Sinne einer 3- oder 4-fach-Verschraubung empfehlenswert. Bei instabilen Anderson-III-Frakturen und kleinem Basisfragment kann alternativ eine ventrale Versorgung mittels Plattenosteosynthese unter Einbezug von HWK III durchgeführt werden.

In a consensus process with four sessions in 2017, the working group "upper cervical spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) formulated "Therapeutic Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Upper Cervical Fractures", taking their own experience and the current literature into consideration. The following article describes the recommendations for axis ring fractures (traumatic spondylolysis C2). About 19 to 49% of all cervical spine injuries include the axis vertebra. Traumatic spondylolysis of C2 may include potential discoligamentous instability C2/3. The primary aim of the diagnostic process is to detect the injury and to determine potential disco-ligamentous instability C2/3. For classification purposes, the Josten classification or the modified Effendi classification may be used. The Canadian C-spine rule is recommended for clinical screening for C-spine injuries. CT is the preferred imaging modality and an MRI is needed to determine the integrity of the discoligamentous complex C2/3. Conservative treatment is appropriate in case of stable fractures with intact C2/3 motion segment (Josten type 2 and 2). Patients should be closely monitored, in order to detect secondary dislocation as early as possible. Surgical treatment is recommended in cases of primary severe fracture dislocation or discoligamentous instability C2/3 (Josten 3 and 4) and/or secondary fracture dislocation. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) C2/3 is the treatment of choice. However, in case of facet joint luxation C2/3 with looked facet (Josten 4), a primary posterior approach may be necessary.Im Jahr 2017 wurde die Arbeitsgruppe „obere HWS“ in der Sektion Wirbelsäulenchirurgie der DGOU etabliert. Die Mitglieder der AG erstellten in einem formalen Konsensverfahren im nominalem Gruppenprozess mit 4 Präsenzveranstaltungen, Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik und Therapie von Axisringfrakturen unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Literatur. Der folgende Artikel beschreibt die Empfehlung für Frakturen des Axisrings (traumatische Spondylolyse HWK II). Axisfrakturen werden mit einer Häufigkeit von 19 – 41% bei Nachweis einer HWS-Verletzung detektiert. Insbesondere besteht bei Frakturen des Axisrings eine potenzielle diskoligamentäre Instabilität. Daher zielt die Diagnostik auf die Detektion der Verletzung sowie die Beurteilung einer möglichen diskoligamentären Instabilität ab. Zur Klassifikation wird die Klassifikation nach Josten oder auch die von Levine modifizierte Effendi-Klassifikation empfohlen. Zum primären klinischen Screening hat sich die Canadian C-Spine Rule bewährt. Bildgebendes Verfahren der Wahl bei klinischem Verdacht auf eine Axisringverletzung ist die Computertomografie. Die MRT dient der Beurteilung der Integrität des diskoligamentären Komplexes HWK II/III. Stabile Axisringfrakturen können konservativ in einer Zervikalorthese behandelt werden, wobei eine engmaschige Dislokationskontrolle obligat ist. Im Falle einer sekundären Dislokation ist eine operative Stabilisierung indiziert. Eine OP-Indikation besteht bei ausgeprägter Dislokation und/oder diskoligamentärer Instabilität HWK II/III, die am häufigsten bei Josten-Typ-3- und -4-Frakturen vorliegt. Operative Standardtherapie ist die ventrale Fusion HWK II/III wobei insbesondere bei Typ-4-Frakturen ein primär dorsales Vorgehen zur Frakturreposition und ggf. Stabilisation notwendig werden kann.

Geriatrische Sakrumfrakturen stellen eine eigenstandige Frakturentitat mit wachsender Inzidenz und von steigender gesundheitsokonomischer Relevanz dar. Die Ziele der Behandlung sind sehr unterschiedlich zu denen bei jungeren Patienten mit Hochenergiebeckenverletzungen. Um den Erfolg der Behandlung geriatrischer Sakrumfrakturen beurteilen zu konnen, mussen daher andere, vielleicht auch neue Messinstrumente zur Anwendung kommen. Literaturubersicht zu den vorhandenen Konzepten und Messinstrumenten der Outcome-Messung nach geriatrischen Sakrumfrakturen. Narrativer Ubersichtsartikel basierend auf einer Recherche der relevanten deutsch- und englischsprachigen Literatur der letzten 10 Jahre. Geriatrische Sakrumfrakturen fuhren zu einer verminderten Mobilitat, einer erhohten korperlichen und sozialen Abhangigkeit und einer hohen Morbiditats- und Mortalitatsrate. Standardisierte spezifische Beurteilungsverfahren zur Beurteilung des funktionellen Ergebnisses nach geriatrischen Sakrumfrakturen fehlen. Bis diese entwickelt werden, scheint die parallele Erfassung von Mortalitat, Timed „Up and Go“ Test, Oswestry Disability Index und einem generischen Gesundheitsfragebogen (Short Form-36, EurQul-5D) am sinnvollsten. Unser Wissen uber den naturlichen Verlauf nach geriatrischen Sakrumfrakturen ist derzeit limitiert, durch das Fehlen gut validierter Instrumente zur Messung des radiologischen und funktionellen Outcome. Dies gilt es zu beachten, wenn der Erfolg neuer Therapien fur diese Patienten beurteilen werden muss. Zukunftige Studien sollten existierende Scores fur diese Patientengruppe validieren und neue spezifische Messinstrumente entwickeln.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after hemiarthroplasty for geriatric femoral neck fractures are a devastating complication that results in serious morbidity and increased mortality. Identifying risk factors associated with early infection after HA for hip fractures may offer an opportunity to address and prevent this complication in many patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative risk factors for early PJI after HA in hip fracture patients. From January 2010 to December 2015, 312 femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA 31-B) in 305 patients were included in this single-center, retrospective study. PJI was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definition of deep incisional surgical site infection. Early infection referred to a postoperative period of 4 weeks. Binary univariable and multivariable regression analysis with backward elimination was applied to identify predictors of PJI. Median age of all patients was 83.0 (IQR 76–89) years. We identified 16 (5.1%) early PJI which all required surgical revision. Median length of in-hospital stay (LOS) was 20.0 (IQR 10–36) days after PJI compared to 10.0 (8–15) days without deep wound infection. In-hospital mortality was 30.8 vs. 6.6%, respectively. Preoperative CRP levels (OR 1.009; 95% CI 1.002–1.018; p = 0.044), higher BMI (OR 1.092; 95% CI 1.002–1.189; p = 0.044) and prolonged surgery time (OR 1.013; 95% CI 1.000–1.025; p = 0.041) were independent risk factors for PJI. Excluding infection following major revision due to mechanical complications identified preoperative CRP levels (OR 1.012; 95% CI 1.003–1.021; p = 0.007) and chronic glucocorticoid therapy (OR 6.314; 95% CI 1.223–32.587; p = 0.028) as risk factors, a clear trend was seen for higher BMI (OR 1.114; 95% CI 1.000–1.242; p = 0.051). A cut-off value at CRP levels ≥ 14 mg/l demonstrated a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 70% with a fair accuracy (AUC 0.707). Preoperative serum CRP levels, higher BMI and prolonged surgery time are independent predictors of early PJI. Excluding PJI secondary to major revision surgery revealed chronic glucocorticoid use as a risk factor apart from preoperative CRP levels.

Thorakolumbale Frakturen des alten Menschen sind regelmasig mit einer Osteoporose assoziiert. Diese kann Ursache der Fraktur oder wichtige Komorbiditat bei einem Trauma sein. Die OF-Klassifikation erlaubt eine einfache und fur die Therapie relevante Einteilung der Frakturen und basiert auf Rontgenaufnahmen, Computer- (CT) und Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT). Die Therapie richtet sich nach dem klinischen und dem radiologischen Erscheinungsbild und kann mithilfe des OF-Scores bestimmt werden. Dieser berucksichtigt die aktuelle klinische Situation, aber auch Komorbiditaten des Patienten. Die Therapieempfehlungen basieren auf einem Expertenkonsens und beinhalten konservative und operative Optionen. Sofern eine chirurgische Therapie indiziert ist, kommen Wirbelkorperaugmentationen, perkutane Stabilisationen, aber auch offene Verfahren zur Anwendung.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after low- and no-energy trauma leads to an improved diagnosis and, as a result, to a change in the therapeutic strategy. Methods All patients with AS, who underwent surgery after minor traumas (low-energy traumas, LETs) and patients without trauma history (NET: no-energy trauma), were retrospectively analysed. The diagnostic and planned surgical procedure was examined initially and again after total spine MRI in patients with persistent and/or new complaints. Results One hundred and thirty-six patients with AS after trauma were surgically treated. A total of 92 patients with LETs and 12 patients with NETs were included. After initial diagnostics (CT and X-ray) were performed in 15.4% of the patients with LET or NET (n = 16), we found occult fractures on MRI scans. In ten of these patients (6 LET, 4 NET) in which a previous decision was made to follow conservative therapy, no fracture indication was found on CT or X-ray. Two fracture heights were observed in six patients who experienced LET. However, on X-ray and CT, the fractures were only visible at one height. All fractures were treated surgically with stabilization and decompression if indicated. Conclusion Considering the high percentage of our patient population with occult fractures, we recommend supplementing the basic diagnostic procedures with an MRI of the entire spinal column in patients with painful spinal column findings after minor trauma and for those with persistent pain without trauma. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.