Search

Background:  Nerve transfers from one common donor nerve to recipient nerves with multiple target branches can yield slower and unpredictable recovery in the target nerves. Our hypothesis is that steal phenomenon exists when multiple nerve neurotization comes from one donor nerve., Methods:  In 30 Sprague-Dawley rats, the left ulnar nerve (UN) was selected as the donor nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) and median nerve (MN) as the recipient target nerves. The rats were separated into three groups (10 rats in each): group A, UN-to-MCN (one-target); group B, UN-to-MN (one-target); and group C, UN-to-MCN and MN (two-target). The right upper limbs were nonoperative as the control group. Outcome obtained at 20 weeks after surgery included grooming test, muscle weight, compound muscle action potential, tetanic muscle contraction force, axon counts, and retrograde labeling of the involved donor and target nerves., Results:  At 20 weeks after surgery, muscles innervated by neurotization resulted in significant worse outcomes than the control side. This was especially true in two-target neurotization in the parameter of muscle weight and forearm flexor muscle contraction force outcome when compared to one-target neurotization. Steal phenomenon does exist because flexor muscle contraction force was significantly worse during two-target neurotization., Conclusion:  This study proves the existence of steal phenomenon in multiple target neurotization but does not significantly affect the functional results. Postoperative rehabilitative measures (including electrical stimulation, induction exercise) and patient compliance (ambition and persistence) are other crucial factors that hold equivalent importance to long-term successful recovery., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: With ulnar nerve injuries, paralysis of the first dorsal interosseous and adductor pollicis muscle weakens the patient's pinch. In the palm, we transferred the opponens pollicis motor branch to the deep terminal division of the ulnar nerve for pinch reconstruction., Methods: Sixteen patients with ulnar nerve injuries around the elbow underwent reconstruction and were followed up postoperatively for a minimum of 14 months. Their mean age was 41 ± 16 years, and the mean interval between injury and surgery was 134 ± 126 days (range, 2 to 390 days). Preoperatively and postoperatively, grasp, key, and subterminal key pinch strength were measured using dynamometers., Results: Reinnervation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle was observed in 15 of the 16 patients. Mean grasp strength improved from 15.5 ± 8.5 kg preoperatively to 24 ± 10 kg postoperatively, achieving 57% ± 16% of contralateral hand strength. Preoperatively, terminal key pinch averaged 3 ± 1 kg, which improved postoperatively to 5.5 ± 2 kg, achieving 71 ± 24% of the strength measured contralaterally. Preoperatively to postoperatively, subterminal key pinch force increased from 0 to 2.4 ± 1.3 kg, achieving 61% ± 27% that of the unaffected side. Patients who underwent surgery within 6 months of their injury showed a mean subterminal key pinch strength recovery of 63% ± 27% of the normal side, whereas those who underwent surgery between 7 and 13 months after injury showed a mean subterminal key pinch strength recovery of 51% ± 29%., Conclusion: Transferring the opponens pollicis motor branch to the deep terminal division of the ulnar nerve improved pinch and grasp strength without jeopardizing thumb function., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Traumatic peripheral nerve injury, with an annual incidence reported to be approximately 13-23 per 100,000 people, is a serious clinical condition that can often lead to significant functional impairment and permanent disability. Although nerve transfer has become increasingly popular in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries, satisfactory results cannot be obtained even with total nerve root transfer, especially after serious injuries. To overcome this problem, we hypothesize that the application of stem cells in conjunction with nerve transfer procedures may be a viable alternative to more aggressive treatments that do not result in adequate improvement. Similarly, some preliminary studies have shown that adipose stem cells combined with acellular nerve allograft provide promising results in the repair of brachial plexus injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of combining adipose-derived stem cells with nerve transfer procedure in a rat brachial plexus injury model., Methods: Twenty female Wistar rats weighing 300-350 g and aged 8-10 weeks were randomly divided into two groups: a nerve transfer group (NT group) and a nerve transfer combined adipose stem cell group (NT and ASC group). The upper brachial plexus injury model was established by gently avulsing the C5-C6 roots from the spinal cord with microforceps. A nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin procedure) was performed with or without seeded allogeneic adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells at a rate of 2 × 10 6  cells were injected locally to the surface of the nerve transfer area with a 23-gauge needle. Immunohistochemistry (S100 and PGP 9.5 antibodies) and electrophysiological data were used to evaluate the effect of nerve repair 12 weeks after surgery., Results: The mean latency was significantly longer in the NT group (2.0 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.96-2.06) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) (p < .001). The mean peak value was higher in the NT group (1.7 ± 0.0 mV, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.3 mV, 95% CI: 1.6-1.9) with no significant difference (p = .61). Although S100 and PGP 9.5 positive areas were observed in higher amounts in the NT and ASC group compared to the NT group, the differences were not statistically significant (p = .26 and .08, respectively)., Conclusions: This study conducted on rats provides preliminary evidence that adipose-derived stem cells may have a positive effect on nerve transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus injury. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: High median nerve injuries can lead to poor distal recovery, especially poor functioning of median innervated thenar muscles involved in thumb opposition and palmar abduction. The palmaris brevis (PB) is a small subcutaneous muscle innervated by ulnar nerve. Innervation of the PB is in most of cases provided by the ulnar digital nerve to the little finger. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of transferring the PB motor branch (PBMB) to the median nerve thenar motor branch (TMB), in order to allow for early restoration of thumb palmar abduction and opposition, through a preliminary cadaveric study., Methods: Twenty-five cadaver upper limbs were dissected under magnification. The length of the PBMB and TMB, and their origin were recorded. Nerve transfer from PBMB to TMB was conducted, and evaluated on 2 parameters: surgical feasibility, and distance from the coaptation site to the recipient nerve muscle entry point. The PBMB and TMB were harvested, fixated in formalin, then embedded in paraffin. They were sectioned transversely, and stained with a combination of hematoxylin-eosin and Luxol fast blue. Myelinated axons were counted in each specimen and the donor-to-recipient axon ratio was recorded., Results: The PBMB was constant and originated from the ulnar digital nerve of the little finger in all cases. The transfer from PBMB to TMB was feasible in all cases. Mean myelinated axon counts of PBMB and TMB were 253±142 and 356±198, respectively (p=0.06). The donor-to-recipient axon ratio was 1:1.41. The mean distance from coaptation of the PBMB to the recipient thenar muscles was 23.1±3.0mm., Conclusions: Based on our results, PBMB to TMB transfer is feasible. The PBMB has the advantage over other distal nerve transfer donors to be constant and superficial, allowing for an easier harvest. Moreover, this procedure does not sacrifice any intrinsic function of the hand, and the proximity of the PBMB with the carpal tunnel allows for a single incision procedure. Therefore, early restoration of the median innervated thenar muscles may be feasible by the PBMB to TMB transfer in cases of high median nerve lesions., Level of Evidence: IV., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background:  The restoration of finger movement in total brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) is an ultimate challenge. Pedicled vascularized ulnar nerve graft (VUNG) connecting a proximal root to distal target nerves has shown unpredictable outcomes. We modified this technique by harvesting VUNG as a free flap to reinnervate median nerve (MN). We analyzed the long-term outcomes of these methods., Methods:  From years 1998 to 2015, 118 acute total brachial plexus patients received free VUNG to innervate the MN. Patients were followed up at least 5 years after the initial surgery. Donor nerves included the ipsilateral C5 root (25 patients) or contralateral C7 root (CC7 = 93 patients). Recovery of finger and elbow flexion was evaluated with the modified Medical Research Council system. Michigan Hand Score and Quick-DASH were used to represent the patient-reported outcomes., Results:  For finger flexion, ipsilateral C5 transfer to MN alone yielded similar outcomes to MN + MCN (musculocutaneous nerve), while CC7 had significantly better finger flexion when coapted to MN alone than to MN + MCN. Approximately 75% patients were able to achieve finger flexion with nerve transfer alone. For elbow flexion, best outcome was seen in the ipsilateral C5 to MCN and MN., Conclusion:  In acute total BPI, the priority is to identify the ipsilateral C5 root to innervate MN, with concomitant innervation of MCN to establish the best outcomes for finger and elbow flexion. CC7 is more reliable when used to innervate one target (MN)., Level of Evidence:  III., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate functional outcomes after direct suturing of upper extremity nerve defects in high elbow or wrist flexion., Methods: A retrospective review was conducted in patients treated for median, ulnar, or radial nerve defects between 2011 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were a defect > 1 cm and a minimal follow-up period of 1 year. Nerve defects were bridged by an end-to-end suture in 90° elbow flexion or 70° wrist flexion for 6 weeks., Results: Nine patients with a mean age of 30.2 years were included. The patients presented with two ulnar nerve defects, four median nerve defects, and three radial nerve defects at various levels. The mean time to surgery was 13.5 weeks for recent injuries. The mean defect length was 2.9 cm, and the mean follow-up time was 22.4 months. Two patients had joint stiffness that was more likely related to the associated injuries than the 6-week immobilization. Successful outcomes were achieved in eight of the nine patients. Meaningful motor recovery was observed in seven patients, and all recovered meaningful sensation. Excellent nerve recovery was noted in pediatric patients and in those with distal nerve defects., Conclusion: Temporary high joint flexion allows for direct coaptation of upper extremity nerve defects up to 4 cm located near the elbow or wrist. In this small and heterogenous cohort, functional outcomes seemed to be comparable to those obtained with short autografting., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Functional recovery following peripheral nerve injury worsens with increasing durations of delay prior to repair. From the time of injury until re-innervation occurs, denervated muscle undergoes progressive atrophy that limits the extent to which motor function can be restored. Similarly, Schwann cells (SC) in the distal nerve lacking axonal interaction progressively lose their capacity to proliferate and support regenerating axons. The relative contributions of these processes to diminished functional recovery is unclear. We developed a novel rat model to isolate the effects of SC vs. muscle denervation on functional recovery. Four different groups underwent the following interventions for 12 weeks prior to nerve transfer: 1) muscle denervation; 2) SC denervation; 3) muscle + SC denervation (negative control); 4) no denervation (positive control). Functional recovery was measured weekly using the stimulated grip strength testing (SGST). Animals were sacrificed 13 weeks post nerve transfer. Retrograde labeling was used to assess the number of motor neurons that regenerated their axons. Immunofluorescence was performed to evaluate target muscle re-innervation and atrophy, and to assess the phenotype of the SC within the distal nerve segment. Functional recovery in the muscle denervation and SC denervation groups mirrored that of the negative and positive control groups, respectively. The SC denervation group achieved better functional recovery, with a greater number of reinnervated motor endplates and less muscle atrophy, than the muscle denervation group. Retrograde labeling suggested a higher number of neurons contributing to muscle reinnervation in the muscle denervation group as compared to SC denervation (p > 0.05). The distal nerve segment in the muscle denervation group had a greater proportion of SCs expressing the proliferation marker Ki67 as compared to the SC denervation group (p < 0.05). Conversely, the SC denervation group had a higher percentage of senescent SCs expressing p16 as compared to the muscle denervation group (p < 0.05). The deleterious effects of muscle denervation are more consequential than the effects of SC denervation on functional recovery. The effects of 12 weeks of SC denervation on functional outcome were negligible. Future studies are needed to determine whether longer periods of SC denervation negatively impact functional recovery., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Severe proximal median nerve palsies often result in irreversible thenar atrophy and thumb abduction function loss. Tendon transfer involves substantial limitations and challenges; but, distal nerve transfer may provide an alternative treatment. Our goal was to validate the anatomical suitability of two distal ulnar nerve branches for thenar muscle reanimation., Materials and Methods: We assessed nerve transfer to the recurrent branch of median nerve (RMN) in 16 embalmed cadaveric hands. The ulnar motor branch to the flexor digiti minimi brevis (FDMBn) and the ulnar motor branch to the third lumbrical (3rdLn) were assessed for transfer. Coaptation success was measured by the overlap of the nerve donor with the RMN and correspondence of nerve diameters., Results: The mean transferable length and width of the RMN were 20.7 ± 4.5 and 1.0 ± 0.3 mm, respectively. We identified an average of three branches in the branching anatomy from the ulnar nerve to the hypothenar muscles. The maximal transferable lengths and widths of the FDMBn and the 3rdLn were 13.8 ± 4.4 and 0.5 ± 0.1 mm and 24.1 ± 6.4 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. The overlap with the RMN of the FDMBn and 3rdLn was 9.0 ± 3.6 (2.0-15.3) and 17.8 ± 6.0 (4.7-27.5) mm, respectively., Conclusions: This anatomical study demonstrates the feasibility of distal nerve transfers between the ulnar and median nerves in the hand for reanimation of thenar muscles. Ulnar motor donors of the BrFDMBn and 3rdLn likely represent the least morbid donors with short distances for regeneration and a single coaptation repair., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The supercharge end-to-side anterior interosseous to ulnar motor nerve transfer has gained popularity over the past decade as a method of augmenting intrinsic muscle reinnervation in patients with acute neurotmetic ulnar nerve injuries. Controversy remains regarding its efficacy and appropriate clinical indications in cubital tunnel syndrome, where the timing of onset of axonal loss is less clear. The authors present guidelines for patient selection, surgical technique, and postoperative rehabilitation based on their clinical experience with the technique in this patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, V.

Introduction: In upper brachial plexus injuries (C5-C6-C7), selective nerve transfers appear as a favourable technique. For this purpose, transfer of an ulnar nerve fascicle to the biceps motor branch (Oberlin's procedure) is often used. In this paper we present our modified Oberlin technique, as well as a comparison of this method with the classic Oberlin procedure., Materials and Methods: We present two groups of patients that where operated by two different surgeons. The first group, consisting of 16 patients was treated with the classic Oberlin procedure. The second group included 5 patients treated with a modified Oberlin procedure, where two fascicles from the ulnar nerve were transferred to both the motor branch of the biceps and the motor branch of the brachialis muscles., Results: In the last follow-up of the 16 patients from the first group with the classic Oberlin procedure, 15 patients (93.75%) had Medical Research Council (MRC) grade of biceps strength 4 and 1 patient (6.25%) had MRC grade 3, whereas in the group where the modified Oberlin procedure was used the muscle strength was very durable with 4 out of 5 the patients reached MRC grade of 4+ and one MRC grade of 4, and with a mean elbow strength at 5.4 kg (3-8 kg). No sensitivity or motor problems were encountered on the ulnar territories for both groups., Conclusion: With the modified Oberlin technique, the median nerve is reserved and both elbow flexors are innervated. The results of this technique compare favourably with those of other methods. Thus, we propose using the double fascicle transfer from the ulnar nerve to both elbow flexors in order to restore a strong elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: After brachial plexus injuries, sacrifice of the contralateral C7 (cC7) root from the non-injured side is well tolerated and various schemes to innervate the injured side from the cC7 root have been used. Objective: To demonstrate the surgical outcomes from transferring the cC7 to the affected side via both the ulnar nerve and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MACN). Methods: A retrospective study of 16 adult patients sustaining total brachial plexus avulsion who underwent this procedure. The British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire scoring were used to evaluate the recovery. Results: About 68.75% of the patients achieved functional recovery of elbow flexion to M3 or better and 43.75% achieved motor recovery of wrist and finger flexion to M3 or better. Sensation in the median nerve territory recovered to S2 or better in 68.75%. The DASH scores after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery. Conclusions: cC7 transfer via both ulnar and MACNs is an effective and safe procedure in patients sustaining total injuries of brachial plexus.

Elbow flexion is the first goal in upper partial brachial plexus palsy treatment. However, elbow extension is essential for daily living activities. To recover this function, one fascicle of ulnar nerve can be transferred to the branch of the long head of the triceps, but this procedure has been previously published in only two patients. The goal of our study is to assess a larger series of transfers of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps to help patients recover elbow extension. Ten male patients with C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus injuries underwent operation. For shoulder recovery, we transferred the spinal accessory nerve and rhomboid nerve. For elbow flexion, one fascicle of median nerve was transferred to the nerve of the biceps. For elbow extension, we transferred one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps. Tendon transfers were performed for wrist and finger extension. Nine patients recovered M4 elbow flexion and extension. One patient had M3 elbow extension and flexion. Average active shoulder elevation was 85° and average active shoulder external rotation was 65° All patients recovered finger and wrist extension. The classical techniques of grafts or phrenic or intercostal nerve transfers to recover elbow extension are not always reliable, according to the literature. Because the harvested ulnar nerve motor fascicle is close to the branch of the long head of the triceps, the recovery time for this procedure is shorter than that of other described nerve transfers. The isolated recovery of the reinnervated long head of the triceps muscle excludes spontaneous recovery occasionally noted in upper root plexus injuries. The transfer of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps is reliable for active elbow extension recovery in C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus palsies., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

We sought to identify predictors of failed ulnar nerve fascicle (to flexor carpi ulnaris) to biceps motor branch transfer. A retrospective review of adult brachial plexus patients treated with flexor carpi ulnaris to biceps transfer with a minimum 1-year follow-up was performed. Failure, defined as modified British Medical Research Council grade <3 elbow flexion was compared with randomly selected controls (M ≥ 4-). Ninety-one patients, of which 80% regained >M3 flexion met criteria. Eighteen failures and 18 controls, with similar follow-up (20 vs 23 months) were evaluated. Preoperative flexor carpi ulnaris weakness (M < 5) was significantly more common in failures (78% vs 33%). The rate of flexor carpi ulnaris recovery after operation was significantly higher in controls (86% vs 7%). Increased failure risk can be expected with impaired preoperative flexor carpi ulnaris function. The challenge is how to identify which patients will regain near normal flexor carpi ulnaris strength as excellent outcomes can be obtained. Level of evidence: III.

Background: The aim of the current study is to investigate the first and second lumbrical nerves as potential fibers donors to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve to avoid intrinsic atrophy in high ulnar nerve injuries., Methods: Sixteen fresh frozen cadaveric hands were dissected, the radial lumbrical nerves accessed, and a coaptation, either in reverse end-to-side or in double end-to-side through a bridge nerve graft, was created to the deep motor branch of ulnar nerve. Semithin sections were taken from samples of donor and recipient nerves for qualitative (nerve architecture) and quantitative studies (fiber count and donor/recipient ratio)., Results: The first lumbrical showed a robust trunk and a superior axon density (9,126.50 ± 2,923.41 axons/mm 2 ) to the ulnar motor branch (7,506.50 ± 1,137.50 axons/mm 2 distal to the opponens tunnel and 7,947.75 ± 1,741.24 axons/mm 2 before its terminal branching); the ulnar motor branch showed a higher axon number (2,633.51 ± 410.00 distal to the opponens tunnel and 2,345.75 ± 2,101.56 before its terminal branching) than the first lumbrical (1,410.56 ± 823.89); section areas occupied by axons were higher in proximal (0.20 ± 0.16) and distal (0.26 ± 0.20) ulnar samples than the first lumbrical (0.17 ± 0.16). Donor/recipient ratio first lumbrical/deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve were 1:1.86 (distal to the opponens tunnel) and 1:1.67 (at its terminal branching); data about the second lumbrical were ruled out because of bias., Conclusions: A transfer from the first lumbrical nerve to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve in palm is suitable to avoid intrinsic atrophy., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Elbow flexion after upper brachial plexus injury may be restored by a nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the biceps motor branch with an optional nerve transfer from the median nerve to the brachialis motor branch (single and double fascicular nerve transfer). This meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of both techniques and the added value of additional reinnervation of the brachialis muscle., Methods: Comprehensive searches were performed identifying studies concerning restoration of elbow flexion through single and double fascicular nerve transfers. Only C5 to C6 lesion patients were included in quantitative analysis to prevent confounding by indication. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching British Medical Research Council elbow flexion grade 3 or greater. Meta-analysis was performed with random effects models., Results: Thirty-five studies were included (n = 688). In quantitative analysis, 29 studies were included (n = 341). After single fascicular nerve transfer, 190 of 207 patients reached Medical Research Council grade 3 or higher (random effects model, 95.6 percent; 95 percent CI, 92.9 to 98.2 percent); and after double fascicular nerve transfer, 128 of 134 patients reached grade 3 or higher (random effects model, 97.5 percent; 95 percent CI, 95.0 to 100 percent; p = 0.301). Significantly more double nerve transfer patients reached grade 4 or greater if preoperative delay was 6 months or less (84 of 101 versus 49 of 51; p = 0.035)., Conclusions: Additional reinnervation of the brachialis muscle did not result in significantly more patients reaching Medical Research Council grade 3 or higher for elbow flexion. Double fascicular nerve transfer may result in more patients reaching grade 4 or higher in patients with a preoperative delay less than 6 months. The median nerve may be preserved or used for another nerve transfer without substantially impairing elbow flexion restoration.

Peripheral nerve gaps often lead to interrupted innervation, manifesting as severe sensory and motor dysfunctions. The repairs of the nerve injuries have not achieved satisfactory curative effects in clinic. The transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs)-laden acellular nerve xenografts (ANX) has been proven more effective than the acellular nerve allografting. Besides, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can inhibit inflammation and apoptosis, and thus is conducive to the microenvironmental improvement of axonal regeneration. This study aims to investigate the joint effect of BMSCs-seeded ANX grafting and G-CSF administration, and explore the relevant mechanisms. Adult SD rats were divided into five groups randomly: ANX group, ANX combined with G-CSF group, BMSCs-laden ANX group, BMSCs-laden ANX combined with G-CSF group, and autograft group. Eight weeks after transplantation, the detection of praxiology and neuroelectrophysiology was conducted, and then the morphology of the regenerated nerves was analyzed. The inflammatory response and apoptosis in the nerve grafts as well as the expression of the growth-promoting factors in the regenerated tissues were further assayed. G-CSF intervention and BMSCs implanting synergistically promoted peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery following ANX bridging, and the restoration effect was matchable with that of the autologous nerve grafting. Moreover, local inflammation was alleviated, the apoptosis of the seeded BMSCs was decreased, and the levels of the neuromodulatory factors were elevated. In conclusion, the union application of BMSCs-implanted ANX and G-CSF ameliorated the niche of neurotization and advanced nerve regeneration substantially. The strategy achieved the favorable effectiveness as an alternative to the autotransplantation., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: In infant poliomyelitis or poliomyelitis-like paresis, there has been no means of treating residual paralysis and the policy has been to wait until an affected infant has grown sufficiently to enable tendon transfer or arthrodesis. However, recent reports have described relatively good results for early surgical intervention in the form of nerve transfer., Methods: In a 4-year and 6-month-old child we transferred a partial ulnar nerve for elbow flexor reconstruction even 3 years and 10 months after the onset of poliomyelitis-like palsy and also transferred partial accessory and radial nerves for shoulder function restoration 6 months after the first operation., Results: Elbow flexor restored M4 on the British Medical Research Council scale. The shoulder subluxation resolved, however, the strengths of the deltoid and infraspinatus remained almost M1. At the most recent clinical examination, the patient was 18 years old and the active range of motion of patient's left elbow was 0°-125°, and those of the whole shoulder girdle were abduction 35°, flexion 60°, extension 30° and external rotation 0°., Conclusions: The outcomes we achieved may support partial nerve transfer techniques as viable treatment options for persistent long-standing motor deficits following poliomyelitis-like palsy in children. However, we recommend performing partial nerve transfer as early as possible after recovery from flaccid paralysis and also use of nerves that derive from narrow spinal cord segments. After denervation, children's neuromuscular systems seem to have the ability to regenerate after a much longer period than has generally been believed. This speculation is based on only a single case report; thus, more experience is needed before this generalization can confidently be made., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Nerve transfer has become a common and often effective reconstructive strategy for proximal and complex peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb. This case-based discussion explores the principles and potential benefits of nerve transfer surgery and offers in-depth discussion of several established and valuable techniques including: motor transfer for elbow flexion after musculocutaneous nerve injury, deltoid reanimation for axillary nerve palsy, intrinsic re-innervation following proximal ulnar nerve repair, and critical sensory recovery despite non-reconstructable median nerve lesions.

Background and Importance: The use of nerve transfers to restore nerve function following traumatic avulsion injuries has been described, though there is still a paucity in the literature documenting technique and long-term outcomes for these procedures. The double Oberlin nerve transfer involves transferring fascicles from the median and ulnar nerves to the musculocutaneous nerve to restore elbow flexion in patients with a C5-C6 avulsion injury. The purpose of this case report is to present our indications and technique for a double Oberlin transfer in addition to exhibiting video footage at follow-up time points documenting the incremental improvement in elbow flexion following the injury., Clinical Presentation: The patient is a 25-yr old, left-hand dominant male who presented 5 mo following a motor vehicle accident. He had 0/5 biceps muscle strength on the left with a computed tomography myelogram that demonstrated pseudomeningoceles from C2-C3 to C7-T1 with root avulsions of C5 and C6. He was subsequently indicated for a double Oberlin nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion., Conclusion: In this case report, we present our technique and outcomes for a double Oberlin transfer with restoration of elbow flexion at 1-yr follow-up for a patient with traumatic brachial plexus injury. We believe that the double Oberlin transfer serves as a safe and effective method to restore elbow flexion in this patient population.

Nerve transfer involves the use of a portion of a healthy nerve to repair an injured nerve, and the process has been used to alleviate traumatic brachial plexus injuries in humans. Study of the neural mechanisms that occur during nerve transfer, however, requires the establishment of reliable experimental models. In this study, we developed an ulnar-musculocutaneous nerve-transfer model wherein the biceps muscle of a mouse was re-innervated using a donor ulnar nerve. Similar muscle action potentials were detected in both the end-to-end suture of the transected nerve (correctrepair) group and the ulnar-musculocutaneous nerve-transfer group. Also, re-innervated acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters and muscle spindles were observed in both procedures. There were fewer re-innervated AChR clusters in the nerve transfer group than in the correct repair group at 4 weeks, but the numbers were equal at 24 weeks following surgery. Thus, our ulnar-musculocutaneous nerve-transfer model allowed physiological and morphological evaluation for re-innervation process in mice and revealed the delay of this process during nerve transfer procedure. This model will provide great opportunities to study regeneration, re-innervation, and functional recovery induced via nerve transfer procedures.

Aim:  The author presents a solicited "white paper" outlining her perspective on the role of nerve transfers in the management of nerve injuries., Methods:  PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were evaluated to compare nerve graft and nerve transfer. An evaluation of the scientific literature by review of index articles was also performed to compare the number of overall clinical publications of nerve repair, nerve graft, and nerve transfer. Finally, a survey regarding the prevalence of nerve transfer surgery was administrated to the World Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery (WSRM) results., Results:  Both nerve graft and transfer can generate functional results and the relative success of graft versus transfer depended on the function to be restored and the specific transfers used. Beginning in the early 1990s, there has been a rapid increase from baseline of nerve transfer publications such that clinical nerve transfer publication now exceeds those of nerve repair or nerve graft. Sixty-two responses were received from WSRM membership. These surgeons reported their frequency of "usually or always using nerve transfers for repairing brachial plexus injuries as 68%, radial nerves as 27%, median as 25%, and ulnar as 33%. They reported using nerve transfers" sometimes for brachial plexus 18%, radial nerve 30%, median nerve 34%, ulnar nerve 35%., Conclusion:  Taken together this evidence suggests that nerve transfers do offer an alternative technique along with tendon transfers, nerve repair, and nerve grafts., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

OBJECTIVE Neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) continues to be a problematic occurrence impacting approximately 1.5 per 1000 live births in the United States, with 10%-40% of these infants experiencing permanent disability. These children lose elbow flexion, and one surgical option for recovering it is the Oberlin transfer. Published data support the use of the ulnar nerve fascicle that innervates the flexor carpi ulnaris as the donor nerve in adults, but no analogous published data exist for infants. This study investigated the association of ulnar nerve fascicle choice with functional elbow flexion outcome in NBPP. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective study of 13 cases in which infants underwent ulnar to musculocutaneous nerve transfer for NBPP at a single institution. They collected data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, active range of motion (AROM), and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) (using 4 ulnar nerve index muscles). Standard statistical analysis compared pre- and postoperative motor function improvement between specific fascicle transfer (1-2 muscles for either wrist flexion or hand intrinsics) and nonspecific fascicle transfer (> 2 muscles for wrist flexion and hand intrinsics) groups. RESULTS The patients' average age at initial clinic visit was 2.9 months, and their average age at surgical intervention was 7.4 months. All NBPPs were unilateral; the majority of patients were female (61%), were Caucasian (69%), had right-sided NBPP (61%), and had Narakas grade I or II injuries (54%). IONM recordings for the fascicular dissection revealed a donor fascicle with nonspecific innervation in 6 (46%) infants and specific innervation in the remaining 7 (54%) patients. At 6-month follow-up, the AROM improvement in elbow flexion in adduction was 38° in the specific fascicle transfer group versus 36° in the nonspecific fascicle transfer group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS Both specific and nonspecific fascicle transfers led to functional recovery, but that the composition of the donor fascicle had no impact on early outcomes. In young infants, ulnar nerve fascicular dissection places the ulnar nerve at risk for iatrogenic damage. The data from this study suggest that the use of any motor fascicle, specific or nonspecific, produces similar results and that the Oberlin transfer can be performed with less intrafascicular dissection, less time of surgical exposure, and less potential for donor site morbidity.

Background: Injury to distal portion of posterior cord of brachial plexus leads to palsy of radial and axillary nerves. Symptoms are usually motor deficits of the deltoid muscle; triceps brachii muscle; and extensor muscles of the wrist, thumb, and fingers. Tendon transfers, nerve grafts, and nerve transfers are options for surgical treatment of proximal radial nerve palsy to restore some motor functions. Tendon transfer is painful, requires a long immobilization, and decreases donor muscle strength; nevertheless, nerve transfer produces promising outcomes. We present a patient with proximal radial nerve palsy following a blunt injury undergoing triple nerve transfer., Case Description: The patient was involved in a motorcycle accident with complete palsy of the radial and axillary nerves. After 6 months, on admission, he showed spontaneous recovery of axillary nerve palsy, but radial nerve palsy remained. We performed triple nerve transfer, fascicle of ulnar nerve to long head of the triceps branch of radial nerve, flexor digitorum superficialis branch of median nerve to extensor carpi radialis brevis branch of radial nerve, and flexor carpi radialis branch of median nerve to posterior interosseous nerve, for restoration of elbow, wrist, and finger extensions, respectively., Conclusions: Our experience confirmed functional elbow, wrist, and finger extensions in the patient. Triple nerve transfer restores functions of the upper limb in patients with debilitating radial nerve palsy after blunt injuries., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Distal nerve transfer has proven efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate if an injured nerve can be used as a donor nerve for transfer, and to determine the threshold of injury., Materials and Methods: Rat's left ulnar-nerves in the axilla with different degrees of injury were selected as the donor nerves for transfer, and the musculocutaneous-nerves the target nerves for being re-innervated. Six rats each served as positive and negative controls: Group A, intact ulnar-nerve transfer; and Group E, the ulnar-nerve was cut but no transfer. Ten rats each were assigned to Group B to Group D with 25%, 50%, and 75% transected ulnar-nerve, respectively and all were transferred to the musculocutaneous-nerve. After a 12-week recovery period, outcomes were evaluated., Results: Biceps muscle weight measurements showed all experimental groups-D 0.28 ± 0.02 g/72%, C 0.28 ± 0.03 g/73%, B 0.29 ± 0.04 g/74%, and A 0.29 ± 0.04 g/80%-were lighter than group H 0.36 ± 0.04 g, which were all statistically significant (P < 0.001). Muscle tetanus contraction force measurements were the lowest in group D35 ± 8.6 g/69%. Groups C and B measured 41 ± 8.5 g/75% and 40 ± 2.2 g/77% and group A 41 ± 9.4 g/95%, respectively. Group H showed muscle contraction force of 52 ± 7.2 g, which was statistically significant when compared to experimental groups (P < 0.05-0.001). EMG measurements of the biceps muscles showed: group D was 3.6 ± 0.7 mV/69%, group C was 3.6 ± 0.6 mV/75%, and group B was 4.2 mV ± 0.7/81%. Group H was5.1 ± 0.7 mV and statistically significant different when compared with experimental groups (P < 0.05-0.001).Axon counts of healthy ulnar-nerve (Group H) were 1849 ± 362. Axon counts of the injured ulnar-nerve were in group B 1447 ± 579/78%, group C 1051 ± 367/57% and group D 567 ± 230/31%., Conclusion: The donor nerve should be healthy in order to provide optimal result. A big nerve (e.g., ulnar nerve) but injured with at least 75% axon spared is still potentially effective for transfer. In contrast, a small nerve (e.g., intercostal nerve) once injured with 75%axon spared would be considered a suboptimal donor nerve., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: Ulnar and median nerve transfers to arm muscles have been used to recover elbow flexion in infants with neonatal brachial plexus palsy, but there is no direct outcome comparison with the classical supraclavicular nerve grafting approach., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with C5-C7 neonatal brachial plexus palsy submitted to nerve surgery and recorded elbow flexion recovery using the active movement scale (0-7) at 12 and 24 months after surgery. We compared 13 patients submitted to supraclavicular nerve grafting with 21 patients submitted to distal ulnar or median nerve transfer to biceps motor branch. We considered elbow flexion scores of 6 or 7 as good results., Results: The mean elbow flexion score and the proportion of good results were better using distal nerve transfers than supraclavicular grafting at 12 months (p < 0.01), but not at 24 months. Two patients with failed supraclavicular nerve grafting at 12 months showed good elbow flexion recovery after ulnar nerve transfers., Conclusion: Distal nerve transfers provided faster elbow flexion recovery than supraclavicular nerve grafting, but there was no significant difference in the outcome after 24 months of surgery. Patients with failed supraclavicular grafting operated early can still benefit from late distal nerve transfers. Supraclavicular nerve grafting should remain as the first line surgical treatment for children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy.

We compared outcomes of primary vascularized ulnar nerve grafts from the C5 root neurotizing biceps and brachialis muscles, and gracilis functioning free muscle transfer neurotized by the distal spinal accessory nerve, as a primary or salvage procedure after complete brachial plexus injury. At 45 months, three of eight primary vascularized ulnar nerve graft patients regained grade 4 elbow flexion, while one regained grade 3. All 13 primary gracilis transfer patients regained grade 4 elbow flexion. Four patients with vascularized ulnar nerve grafts failed and subsequently had salvage functioning free muscle transfer procedures resulting in delayed recovery. Although vascularized ulnar nerve graft-based primary reconstructions can provide useful elbow flexion, this was achieved in less than half the cases. We consider primary gracilis functioning free muscle transfer neurotized by the distal spinal accessory nerve as the most reliable reconstruction for the restoration of elbow flexion in complete brachial plexus injury., Level of Evidence: IV.

Peripheral nerve defects result in severe denervation presenting sensory and motor functional incapacitation. Currently, a satisfactory therapeutic treatment promoting the repair of injured nerves is not available. As shown in our previous study, acellular nerve xenografts (ANX) implanted with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) replaced allografts and promoted nerve regeneration. Additionally, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been proven to mobilize supplemental cells and enhance vascularization in the niche. Thus, the study aimed to explore whether the combination of G-CSF and BMSC-laden ANX exhibited a synergistic effect. Adult Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into five groups: ANX group, ANX combined with G-CSF group, BMSCs-laden ANX group, BMSCs-laden ANX combined with G-CSF group and autograft group. Electrophysiological parameters and weight ratios of tibialis anterior muscles were detected at 8 weeks post-transplantation. The morphology of the regenerated nerves was assayed, and growth-promoting factors present in the nerve grafts following G-CSF administration or BMSCs seeding were also investigated. Nerve regeneration and functional rehabilitation induced by the combination therapy were significantly advanced, and the rehabilitation efficacy was comparable with autografting. Moreover, the expression of Schwann cell markers, neurotrophic factors and neovessel markers in the nerve grafts was substantially increased. In conclusion, G-CSF administration and BMSCs transplantation synergistically promoted the regeneration of ANX-bridged nerves, which offers a superior strategy to replace autografts in repairing peripheral nerve injuries., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: With complete plexus injuries or late presentation, free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) becomes the primary option of functional restoration. Our purpose is to review cases over a 10-year period of free functioning gracilis muscle transfer after brachial plexus injury to evaluate the effect of different donor nerves used to reinnervate the FFMT on functional outcome., Methods: A retrospective study from April 2001 to January 2011 of a single surgeon's practice was undertaken. During this time period 22 patients underwent FFMT at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri for elbow flexion., Results: Thirteen patients for whom FFMT was performed for elbow flexion met all of the requirements for inclusion in this study. Average time from injury to first operation was 12.8 months (range 4-60), and average time from injury to FFMT was 29 months (range 8-68). Average follow-up was 31.8 months (range 11-84). The nerve donors utilized included the distal accessory nerve, intercostal with or without rectus abdominis nerves, medial pectoral nerves, thoracodorsal nerve, and flexor carpi ulnaris fascicle of ulnar nerve. Functional recovery of elbow flexion was measured using the MRC grading system which showed 1 M5/5, 5 M4, 4 M3, and 3 M2 outcomes., Conclusion: Intraplexal donor motor nerves if available will provide better transferred muscle function because they are higher quality donors closer to the muscle and can be done in one stage without a nerve graft. Otherwise, intercostal, rectus abdominis, or the distal accessory nerve should be used in a staged fashion. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:377-382, 2017., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to contrast the rate and types of complications and secondary surgeries for in situ cubital tunnel release and ulnar nerve transposition., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed by query of hospital billing records for all patients who underwent cubital tunnel surgery from August 2008 to July 2013, yielding 421 patients. Exclusion criteria were acute trauma, revision surgery, neoplasm, age younger than 18 years, incomplete records, and postoperative follow-up less than 3 months. Of the remaining 234 patients, 147 patients underwent 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases and 87 patients underwent 90 ulnar nerve transpositions., Results: In 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases, there were 6 complications (3.8%), including 3 cases (1.9%) of ulnar nerve instability, 2 cases (1.3%) of postoperative infection, and 1 case (0.6%) of a postoperative seroma. In 90 ulnar nerve transpositions, there were 2 complications (2.2%), including 1 case (1.1%) of postoperative infection and 1 case (1.1%) of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury. The secondary surgery rate was 5.7% overall, 2.5% for in situ cubital tunnel release, and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Chronic kidney disease was associated with complication after cubital tunnel surgery. Prior trauma to the elbow and ulnar nerve transposition were associated with secondary surgery., Conclusions: The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (3.2%), but higher for patients with chronic kidney disease. The secondary surgery rate after cubital tunnel surgery was 5.7% overall, but higher for patients with prior elbow trauma and for patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

OBJECTIVE Peripheral nerve transfers to regain elbow flexion via the ulnar nerve (Oberlin nerve transfer) and median nerves are surgical options that benefit patients. Prior studies have assessed the comparative effectiveness of ulnar and median nerve transfers for upper trunk brachial plexus injury, yet no study has examined the cost-effectiveness of this surgery to improve quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The authors present a cost-effectiveness model of the Oberlin nerve transfer and median nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in the adult population with upper brachial plexus injury. METHODS Using a Markov model, the authors simulated ulnar and median nerve transfers and conservative measures in terms of neurological recovery and improvements in quality of life (QOL) for patients with upper brachial plexus injury. Transition probabilities were collected from previous studies that assessed the surgical efficacy of ulnar and median nerve transfers, complication rates associated with comparable surgical interventions, and the natural history of conservative measures. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as cost in dollars per QALY, were calculated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios less than $50,000/QALY were considered cost-effective. One-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were used to assess parameter uncertainty. Probabilistic sampling was used to assess ranges of outcomes across 100,000 trials. RESULTS The authors' base-case model demonstrated that ulnar and median nerve transfers, with an estimated cost of $5066.19, improved effectiveness by 0.79 QALY over a lifetime compared with conservative management. Without modeling the indirect cost due to loss of income over lifetime associated with elbow function loss, surgical treatment had an ICER of $6453.41/QALY gained. Factoring in the loss of income as indirect cost, surgical treatment had an ICER of -$96,755.42/QALY gained, demonstrating an overall lifetime cost savings due to increased probability of returning to work. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model was most sensitive to assumptions about cost of surgery, probability of good surgical outcome, and spontaneous recovery of neurological function with conservative treatment. Two-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that surgical intervention was cost-effective with an ICER of $18,828.06/QALY even with the authors' most conservative parameters with surgical costs at $50,000 and probability of success of 50% when considering the potential income recovered through returning to work. Probabilistic sampling demonstrated that surgical intervention was cost-effective in 76% of cases at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS The authors' model demonstrates that ulnar and median nerve transfers for upper brachial plexus injury improves QALY in a cost-effective manner.

Previously, we showed that undifferentiated bone marrow stromal cell (uBMSC) implantation and vessel insertion into a nerve conduit facilitated peripheral nerve regeneration in a rodent model. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of the uBMSC-laden vessel-containing conduit in repair of segmental nerve defects, using a canine model. Eight beagle dogs were used in this study. Thirty-millimeter ulnar nerve defects were repaired with the conduits (right forelimbs, n = 8) or autografts (left forelimbs, n = 7). In the conduit group, the ulnar artery was inserted into the l-lactide/ε-caprolactone tube, which was filled with autologous uBMSCs obtained from the ilium. In the autograft group, the reversed nerve segments were sutured in situ. At 8 weeks, one dog with only nerve repair with the conduit was sacrificed and the regenerated nerve in the conduit underwent immunohistochemistry for investigation of the differentiation capability of the implanted uBMSCs. In the remaining seven dogs, the repaired nerves underwent electrophysiological examination at 12 and 24 weeks and morphometric measurements at 24 weeks. The wet weight of hypothenar muscles was measured at 24 weeks. At 8 weeks, almost 35% of the implanted uBMSCs expressed glial markers. At 12 weeks, amplitude (0.4 ± 0.4mV) and conduction velocity (18.9 ± 14.3m/s) were significantly lower in the conduit group than in the autograft group (3.2 ± 2.5 mV, 34.9 ± 12.1 m/s, P < 0.05). Although the nerve regeneration in the conduit group was inferior when compared with the autograft group at 24 weeks, there were no significant differences between both groups, regarding amplitude (10.9 ± 7.3 vs. 25.3 ± 20.1 mV; P = 0.11), conduction velocity (23.5 ± 8.7 vs 31.6 ± 20.0m/s; P = 0.35), myelinated axon number (7032 ± 4188 vs 7165 ± 1814; P = 0.94), diameter (1.73 ± 0.31 vs 2.09 ± 0.39μm; P = 0.09), or muscle weight (1.02 ± 0.40 vs 1.19 ± 0.26g; P = 0.36). In conclusion, this study showed that vessel-containing tubes with uBMSC implantation may be an option for treatment of peripheral nerve injuries. However, further investigations are needed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:316-324, 2016., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: To analyze the anatomical feasibility of transferring a motor branch nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) to the triceps upper medial head motor branch (UMHM) and to report the resultant outcome of the restoration of elbow extension in 5 patients with extensive brachial plexus injury., Methods: The ulnar and radial nerves were dissected in 10 cadavers. We measured the length and diameter of the branches to the FCU and the UMHM branch and counted the axons. Then, 5 male patients, mean age 30 years, underwent FCU nerve branch transfer for reconstruction of elbow extension. Elbow flexion was restored via a median nerve branch to biceps transfer., Results: Mean UMHM nerve length and diameter were 86 and 1.5 mm, respectively. Mean number of branches to the FCU muscle was 2.9. Mean FCU nerve length and diameter were 50 and 1.0 mm, respectively. Mean number of myelinated fibers was 818 and 743 for the UMHM and the longest branch to the FCU, respectively. Coaptation between nerves was possible without tension. All patients recovered functional active elbow extension at a mean follow-up of 19 months with a British Medical Research Council score of M4. After surgery, all patients retained a functional FCU with a British Medical Research Council score of M4., Conclusions: Nonselective ulnar nerve fascicles at the root of the limb might not be adequate to restore elbow extension when combined with a median nerve branch transfer for elbow flexion. A selective distal ulnar motor fascicle such as a FCU motor branch could be harvested and connected to a triceps branch to restore elbow extension. Such a nerve transfer would also allow for later transfer of the still functional FCU tendon to the digital extensors., Clinical Relevance: For patients with extensive brachial plexus injury and a preserved medial cord, transferring a motor branch nerve to the FCU is an effective technique for the reconstruction of elbow extension., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients with nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle often present with pain, instability, progressive cubitus valgus and tardy ulnar nerve palsy. At present repairing of this nonunion is still controversial due to previous reported complications such as stiffness and avascular necrosis (AVN). This study reported the outcomes of treatment in nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle in children., Methods: We evaluated 17 patients with nonunion of the lateral humeral condyle after repair. Corrective osteotomy was done in patients with valgus deformity of more than 30 degrees and anterior ulnar nerve transposition in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms. Evaluations were performed with the use of radiographic examination, clinical assessment and also evaluated using Mayo Elbow Performance score by interview and physical examination interpreted as excellent (≥ 90 points), good (75-89 points), fair (60-74 points), and poor (<60 points)., Results: Nine patients were male, and eight were female. The mean age at presentation was 6.5 years. The average interval from the injury to the presentation of the symptoms was 31.5 months. The average duration of follow-up was 48.6 months. The range of flexion was 130-145° (average 130°). The Mayo elbow performance score was excellent in 11 patients and good in six patients. Mean Mayo elbow performance score was 94. Osseous union was achieved after the initial operation in 16 patients. One patient had re-operation using local bone graft and healed nicely. Determination of correlation coefficients found good correlation between neglected time and Mayo performance score <89 (-0.741), age of patient was fairly well correlated with Mayo performance score <89 (-0.635) and ROC curve show that neglected lateral condyle fracture in children more than 28 months will reduce the Mayo score., Conclusion: (1) We support osteosynthesis for children, not only for those who have pain but also for those who are less symptomatic. Good and excellent results by Mayo elbow performance score were found in all patients, and all nonunions were united with good range of motion. (2) Neglecting lateral condyle fracture in children more than 28 months will reduce Mayo performance score to below 89 points. (3) Cases presenting with AVN pre-operatively can still have good results and remodeling potential with congruency of the joint.

Background: Ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow traditionally requires regional or general anesthesia. We wished to assess the feasibility of performing ulnar nerve decompression and transposition at the elbow under local anesthesia., Methods: We examined retrospectively the charts of 50 consecutive patients having undergone ulnar nerve entrapment surgery either under general or local anesthesia. Patients were asked to estimate pain on postoperative days 1 and 7 and satisfaction was assessed at 1 year., Results: On day 1, pain was comparable among all groups. On day 7, pain scores were twice as high when transposition was performed under general anesthesia when compared with local anesthesia. Patient satisfaction was slightly increased in the local anesthesia group. These patients were significantly more willing to repeat the surgery., Conclusion: Ulnar nerve decompression and transposition at the elbow can be performed under local anesthesia without added morbidity when compared with general anesthesia., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background: Nerve transfer surgery has revolutionized the management of traumatic brachial plexus injures. However, the optimal size ratio of donor to recipient nerve has yet to be elucidated. The authors investigated the axon count ratios of ulnar and median fascicular transfers to restore elbow flexion. The authors hypothesized that donor nerve axon counts would be correlated with historical success of various nerve transfers used to restore elbow flexion., Methods: Ten cadaveric specimens were used for a histomorphologic analysis of fascicular nerve transfers. Review of previously published axon counts and clinical results following transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve to restore elbow flexion was performed for the following donor nerves: medial pectoral, spinal accessory, intercostal, thoracodorsal, ulnar, and median fascicular., Results: The average number of fascicles identified was 7.9 in the ulnar nerve and 8.0 in the median nerve. The mean fascicular axon count was 1318 for the ulnar nerve and 1860 for the median nerve. Mean recipient nerve axon count was 1826 for the musculocutaneous biceps branch and 1840 for the brachialis branch. A significant correlation between axon count and clinical results of transfers to restore elbow flexion was observed. Donor-to-recipient nerve axon count ratios below 0.7:1 were associated with a decreased likelihood of a successful outcome., Conclusions: In nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion, an appropriate size match between donor and recipient nerves appears to be a factor affecting clinical success. These data support a donor-to-recipient axon count ratio greater than 0.7:1 as the goal for brachial plexus nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion.

Purpose: Prophylactic release of the ulnar nerve to reduce the incidence of postoperative nerve symptoms in stiff elbows has been recommended. However, the necessity for routine anterior transposition remains unclear. In this study, we aim to gain an insight into the value of routine transposition in open release of stiff elbows., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 94 patients suffering from elbow stiffness with no pre-operative ulnar nerve symptoms. Simple decompression (with in situ decompression or epicondylectomy) and subcutaneous anterior transposition were chronologically performed in 53 and 37 patients, respectively. Another four patients were treated by a single lateral approach with no intervention of the ulnar nerve. Pre- and postoperative range of motion and incidence of ulnar nerve symptoms were recorded. The function of ulnar nerve was measured by Amadio rating scale., Results: The incidence of ulnar nerve dysfuction was 18.9% (ten of 53) and 8.1% (three of 37) in the simple decompression and transposition groups, respectively. The mean Amadio scores were 7.62 and 8.22, respectively. All these data showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In the lateral approach group, 50 % (two of four) of patients developed nerve symptoms with a mean Amadio score of 6.50., Conclusions: The transposition group exhibited a superior nervous outcomes compared with the simple decompression group. No comparison was conducted between the transposition and lateral approach groups because of too few patients in the latter. According to related literature and our experience, we conclude that routine transposition is necessary to prevent postoperative nerve symptoms.

The purpose of this study was to observe whether the results of the median nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps are equivalent to the classical ulnar nerve fascicle transfer, in terms of elbow flexion strength and donor nerve morbidity. Twenty-five consecutive patients were operated between March 2007 and July 2013. The patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1 (n = 8), the patients received an ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps motor branch. In Group 2 (n = 15), the patients received a median nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps motor branch. Two patients with follow-up less than six months were excluded. Both groups were similar regarding age (P = 0.070), interval of injury (P = 0.185), and follow-up period (P = 0.477). Elbow flexion against gravity was achieved in 7 of 8 (87.5%) patients in Group 1, versus 14 of 15 (93.3%) patients in Group 2 (P = 1.000). The level of injury (C5-C6 or C5-C7) did not affect anti-gravity elbow flexion recovery in both the groups (P = 1.000). It was concluded that the median nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps is as good as the ulnar nerve fascicle transfer, even in C5-C7 injuries., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: To demonstrate the new sensory restoration technique in radial nerve injury using the first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve as the donor sensory nerve., Material and Method: Forty formalin-preserved cadavers (18 males and 22 females) were used as the subjects of the present study. The localization of the origin of first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve was performed. The measurement was done to determine the origin of this nerve in relation to the tip of ulnar styloid. The simulated transfer was done. The length of the superficial radial nerve that had to be cut was determined. The measurement was done by two observers to determine the reliability of measurement., Results: The mean horizontal distance (X) to the origin of first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve measured from the tip of ulnar styloid on the right and left side were 5.22 mm and 6.51 mm respectively. The mean vertical distance (Y) to the origin of first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve measured from the tip of ulnar styloid on the right and left side were -7.72 mm and -4.37 mm respectively. The mean length of superficial radial nerve that had to be cut to allow tension free anastomosis, measured from the tip of radial styloid on the right and left side were 68.21 mm and 65.92 mm respectively. The estimated average size of the transferred branch of ulnar cutaneous nerve was about 70% of the size of superficial radial nerve., Conclusion: The sensory restoration in radial nerve injury using sensory nerve transfer from the first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve was technically feasible regarding to the comparable size between two nerves and anatomic consistency of the first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve.

Background: Current surgical management of obstetrical brachial plexus injury is primary reconstruction with sural nerve grafts. Recently, the nerve-to-nerve transfer technique has been used to treat brachial plexus injury in adults, affording the benefit of distal coaptations that minimize regenerative distance. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that nerve transfers are effective in reconstructing isolated upper trunk obstetrical brachial plexus injuries., Methods: Ten patients aged 10 to 18 months were treated with three nerve transfers: spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder abduction and external rotation; a radial to axillary nerve for shoulder abduction; and ulnar or median nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve for elbow flexion. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Active Movement Scale. All patients were followed regularly for up to 2 years., Results: Improvement in elbow and shoulder function was observed between 6 and 24 months. By 6 months, all patients passed the cookie test. At 24 months, shoulder abduction improved from 3.7 ± 0.6 to 5.0 ± 0.5, shoulder external rotation from 1.8 ± 0.4 to 4.3 ± 0.6, shoulder flexion from 3.7 ± 0.5 to 5.4 ± 0.5, elbow flexion from 3.7 ± 0.6 to 6.3 ± 0.2, and forearm supination from 2.1 ± 0.4 to 5.9 ± 0.2. There was no clinically appreciable donor-site morbidity., Conclusions: Nerve transfers reduced operative times compared with traditional nerve grafting procedures. Those patients showed significant gains in Active Movement Scale score by 24 months postoperatively, comparable to results achieved by nerve grafting. These findings support nerve transfers as a potential alternative treatment option for upper trunk obstetrical brachial plexus injuries., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

We report a case of a 10-month-old boy with a left extended upper type (C5-C7) obstetric brachial plexus injury that was treated with double nerve transfer (partial ulnar and partial median nerve transfer) to restore elbow flexion and spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to restore shoulder abduction. At 60 months' follow-up, shoulder abduction was 0-150° (M4) and elbow flexion was 0-140° (M5). Elbow, wrist and finger extension improved to M5. However, shoulder external rotation was only 0-30° (from full internal rotation). No weakness on finger and wrist flexion was observed. Double nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion can be safely done in obstetric brachial plexus injuries with good results. Secondary surgeries may be needed to improve external rotation., (Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The ulnar nerve is a mixed motor and sensory nerve, which making nerve repair more difficult and functional recovery less predictable than pure sensory nerves. Recovery of muscle activity and restoration of sensibility are essential for a functional extremity. A nerve graft, if performed in a tensionless manner, has been shown to generally have better results than an end-to-end approximation performed under tension., Patients and Methods: In study period from 1993 through 2008, evaluation was performed in 48 patients with adequate follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (range, 24 months to 8.3 years). The average patient age was 32.4 years (range, from 6 to 71 years). There were 37 male patients and 11 female patients., Results: We analyzed the effect of the age of the patient, level of injury, graft lenght and denervation time on motor and sensory recovery. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. Results of motor (chi-square = 8.04, p = 0.154) and sensory recovery (chi-square = 7.53, p = 0.184) were not significantly better in patients younger than 25 years compared to the group of patients older than 25 years. The level of the ulnar nerve injury had an impact on the outcome, with better results both sensory (chi-square = 161., p = 0.000) and motor recovery (chi-square = 238., p = 0.000) in patients with distal lesions. The results were significantly better in the group with graft lenght less than 5 cm compared to those longer than 5 cm for both sensory (chi-square = 72.6, p = 0.000) and motor recovery (chi-square = 196., p = 0.000). The functional results were significantly better for both sensory (chi-square 13.4, p = 0.020) and motor recovery (chi-square = 133., p = 0.000) in the group of patients with denervation time shorther than 6 months., Conclusion: The graft length, level of injury and denervation time significantly influenced the functional outcome in both motor and sensory recovery. Better results were in the patients in which the autograft length was up to 5 cm, in patients who were operated within six months from the injury and in patients with distal lesions.

Background: In brachial plexus injuries, when there are no available roots to use as a source for graft reconstruction, nerve transfers emerge as an elective technique. For this purpose, transfer of an ulnar nerve fascicle to the biceps motor branch (Oberlin's procedure) is often used. Despite the high rate of good to excellent results in adults, this technique is seldom used in children., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Oberlin's procedure in the surgical treatment of brachial plexus birth palsy., Methods: Striving to restore elbow flexion, we performed Oberlin's procedure in 17 infants with brachial plexus birth palsy. After follow-up of at least 19 months, primary outcomes were the strength of elbow flexion (modified British Medical Research Council scale), hand function measured using Al-Qattan's scale, and comparative x-rays of both hands to detect altered growth., Results: Good to excellent results related to biceps contraction were obtained in 14 patients (82.3%) (3/MRC3, 11/MRC4). The preoperative Al-Qattan scale score for the hand was maintained at final follow-up. Comparing the treated and normal limb, no difference was observed in hand development by x-ray., Conclusion: Oberlin's procedure is an effective and safe option for the surgical treatment of upper brachial plexus birth palsy.

Background: Nerve transfers or graft repairs in upper brachial plexus palsies are 2 available options for elbow flexion recovery., Objective: To assess outcomes of biceps muscle strength when treated either by grafts or nerve transfer., Methods: A standard supraclavicular approach was performed in all patients. When roots were available, grafts were used directed to proximal targets. Otherwise, a distal ulnar nerve fascicle was transferred to the biceps branch. Elbow flexion strength was measured with a dynamometer, and an index comparing the healthy arm and the operated-on side was developed. Statistical analysis to compare both techniques was performed., Results: Thirty-five patients (34 men) were included in this series. Mean age was 28.7 years (standard deviation, 8.7). Twenty-two patients (62.8%) presented with a C5-C6 injury, whereas 13 patients (37.2%) had a C5-C6-C7 lesion. Seventeen patients received reconstruction with grafts, and 18 patients were treated with a nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the biceps. The trauma to surgery interval (mean, 7.6 months in both groups), strength in the healthy arm, and follow-up duration were not statistically different. On the British Medical Research Council muscle strength scale, 8 of 17 (47%) patients with a graft achieved ≥ M3 biceps flexion postoperatively, vs 16 of 18 (88%) post nerve transfers (P = .024). This difference persisted when a muscle strength index assessing improvement relative to the healthy limb was used (P = .031)., Conclusion: The results obtained from ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps branch were superior to those achieved through reconstruction with grafts.

A case series of seven children and adolescents who underwent secondary nerve grafting of median or ulnar nerve is presented. The children were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 7 years, using the Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Rosen-Lundborg outcome scale. The mean DASH outcome was 14.6 and the mean Rosen-Lundborg score was 2.08. A similar study was conducted for comparison in an adult group, with a mean DASH score of 46.3 and Rosen-Lundborg score of 1.3, indicating superior treatment results in children. The treatment outcome after nerve grafting in children did not match, however, to those obtained in the primary suture group., (© 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.)

Object: Nerve repair using motor fascicles of a different nerve was first described for the repair of elbow flexion (Oberlin technique). In this paper, the authors describe their experience with a similar method for axillary nerve reconstruction in cases of upper brachial plexus palsy., Methods: Of 791 nerve reconstructions performed by the senior author (P.H.) between 1993 and 2011 in 441 patients with brachial plexus injury, 14 involved axillary nerve repair by fascicle transfer from the ulnar or median nerve. All 14 of these procedures were performed between 2007 and 2010. This technique was used only when there was a deficit of the thoracodorsal or long thoracic nerve, which are normally used as donors., Results: Nine patients were followed up for 24 months or longer. Good recovery of deltoid muscle strength was seen in 7 (77.8%) of these 9 patients, and in 4 patients with less follow-up (14-23 months), for an overall success rate of 78.6%. The procedure was unsuccessful in 2 of the 9 patients with at least 24 months of follow-up. The first showed no signs of reinnervation of the axillary nerve by either clinical or electromyographic evaluation in 26 months of follow-up, and the second had Medical Research Council (MRC) Grade 2 strength in the deltoid muscle 36 months after the operation. The last of the group of 14 patients has had 12 months of follow-up and is showing progressive improvement of deltoid muscle function (MRC Grade 2)., Conclusions: The authors conclude that fascicle transfer from the ulnar or median nerve onto the axillary nerve is a safe and effective method for reconstruction of the axillary nerve in patients with upper brachial plexus injury.

Nerve transfers are key components of the surgeon's armamentarium in brachial plexus and complex nerve reconstruction. Advantages of nerve transfers are that nerve regeneration distances are shortened, pure motor or sensory nerve fascicles can be selected as donors, and nerve grafts are generally not required. Similar to the principle of tendon transfers, expendable donor nerves are transferred to denervated nerves with the goal of functional recovery. Transfers may be subdivided into intraplexal, extraplexal, and distal types; each has a unique role in the reconstructive process. A thorough diagnostic workup and intraoperative assessment help guide the surgeon in their use. Nerve transfers have made a positive impact on the outcomes of nerve surgery and are essential tools in complex nerve reconstruction.

Background and Importance: Restoration of elbow extension has not been considered of much importance regarding functional outcomes in brachial plexus surgery; however, the flexion of the elbow joint is only fully effective if the motion can be stabilized, what can be achieved solely if the triceps brachii is coactivated. To present a novel nerve transfer of a healthy motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the nerve of the long head of the triceps to restore the elbow extension function in brachial plexus injuries involving the upper and middle trunks., Clinical Presentation: Case 1 is a 32-year-old man sustaining a right brachial extended upper plexus injury in a motorcycle accident 5 months before admission. The computed tomography myelogram demonstrated avulsion of the C5 and C6 roots. Case 2 is a 24-year-old man who sustained a C5-C7 injury to the left brachial plexus in a traffic accident 4 months before admission. Computed tomography myelogram demonstrated signs of C6 and C7 root avulsion. The technique included an incision at the medial border of the biceps, in the proximal third of the involved arm, followed by identification of the ulnar nerve, the radial nerve, and the branch to the long head of the triceps. The proximal stump of a motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve was sutured directly to the distal stump of the nerve of the long head of the triceps. Techniques to restore elbow flexion and shoulder abduction were applied in both cases. Triceps strength Medical Research Council M4 grade was obtained in both cases., Conclusion: The attempted nerve transfer was effective for restoration of elbow extension in primary brachial plexus surgery; however, it should be selected only for cases in which other reliable donor nerves were used to restore elbow flexion.