Search

Purpose: Preclinical data indicate that fianlimab (anti-lymphocyte activation gene-3) plus cemiplimab (anti-programmed cell death-1) enhances antitumor activity. Here, we report prespecified final analyses of the dose-escalation part of a first-in-human, phase 1 study (NCT03005782) of fianlimab as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in patients with advanced malignancies., Experimental Design: Adult patients received fianlimab 1-40 mg/kg ± cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) across various dose-escalation schedules. Primary objectives were rate of dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (including immune-mediated), deaths, laboratory abnormalities, and pharmacokinetics. Secondary outcomes were objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, and antidrug antibody variables., Results: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled (fianlimab + cemiplimab, n = 47; fianlimab monotherapy, n = 31). One patient treated with 3 mg/kg fianlimab + cemiplimab experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including increased blood creatine phosphokinase and myasthenic syndrome. No maximum tolerated dose was reached. Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 90% of patients with fianlimab monotherapy, 87% with fianlimab + cemiplimab, and 87% who transitioned from monotherapy to combination therapy. Fianlimab pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional, and similar in monotherapy and combination therapy. Across patients who received fianlimab + cemiplimab, five achieved a partial response; three of whom experienced a response after transitioning from monotherapy to combination therapy. Fianlimab 1600 mg Q3W (20 mg/kg in an 80 kg individual) is the selected dose for phase 2 and 3 studies., Conclusions: Fianlimab as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab demonstrated acceptable safety and preliminary antitumor activity, which is generally consistent with previous reports of cemiplimab.

Importance: Whether patients with Child-Pugh class B (CP-B) cancer with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) benefit from active anticancer treatment vs best supportive care (BSC) is debated., Objective: To evaluate the association of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies vs BSC with overall survival (OS) of patients with uHCC and CP-B liver dysfunction., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter, international clinical case series examined data of patients with CP-B with uHCC who were receiving first-line ICI-based regimens from September 2017 to December 2022 whose data were extracted from an international consortium and compared with a cohort of patients with CP-B receiving BSC. Patients were treated in tertiary care centers across Europe, US, and Asia in routine clinical practice. After applying the inclusion criteria, 187 and 156 patients were left in the ICI and BSC groups, respectively. The propensity score was calculated for the following variables: age, alpha-fetoprotein levels, Child-Pugh score, extrahepatic spread, portal vein tumor thrombosis, cirrhosis, ascites, and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status., Exposures: Patients in the ICI group received first-line systemic therapy with either atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) (n = 141) or nivolumab (n = 46)., Main Outcomes and Measures: OS in the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) populations was the main outcome, and it was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method; univariable Cox regression test was used to make comparisons between the 2 groups., Results: The median age was 66 (IQR, 61-72) and 73 (IQR, 66-81) years in the ICI (33 women [18%]) and BSC groups (41 women [26%]), respectively. In the IPTW populations, median OS was significantly longer in the ICI group (7.50 months; 95% CI, 5.62-11.15) compared with BSC (4.04 months; 95% CI, 3.03-5.03; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43-0.80; P < .001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that ICI exposure was associated with a reduction of approximately 50% in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.86; P < .001), and the presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of greater than 1, and alpha-fetoprotein levels of 400 ng/mL or greater were associated with increased risk of death., Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this case series provide comparative evidence of improved survival in association with ICI treatment compared with BSC in patients with uHCC with CP-B liver dysfunction.

Background and Aims: Unlike other malignancies, hepatic functional reserve competes with tumor progression in determining the risk of mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the relative contribution of hepatic decompensation over tumor progression in influencing overall survival (OS) has not been assessed in combination immunotherapy recipients., Approach and Results: From the AB-real observational study (n = 898), we accrued 571 patients with advanced/unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, Child-Pugh A class treated with frontline atezolizumab + bevacizumab (AB). Hepatic decompensation and tumor progression during follow-up were studied in relationship to patients' OS using a time-dependent Cox model. Baseline characteristics were evaluated as predictors of decompensation in competing risks analysis. During a median follow-up of 11.0 months (95% CI: 5.1-19.7), 293 patients (51.3%) developed tumor progression without decompensation, and 94 (16.5%) developed decompensation. In multivariable time-dependent analysis, decompensation (HR: 19.04, 95% CI: 9.75-37.19), hepatocellular carcinoma progression (HR: 9.91, 95% CI: 5.85-16.78), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2/3 (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.69-2.77), and number of nodules >3(HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28-2.08) were independently associated with OS. Pretreatment ALBI grade 2/3 (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.98-5.67) was independently associated with decompensation, whereas viral etiology was protective (sHR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.87). Among patients with viral etiology, effective antiviral treatment was significantly associated with a lower risk of decompensation (sHR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.93)., Conclusions: Hepatic decompensation identifies patients with the worst prognosis following AB and is more common in patients with baseline ALBI >1 and nonviral etiology. Effective antiviral treatment may protect from decompensation, highlighting the prognostic disadvantage of patients with nonviral etiologies and the importance of multidisciplinary management to maximize OS., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Immune-related liver injury (irLI) is commonly observed in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to compare the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of irLI between patients receiving ICIs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vs. other solid tumours., Methods: Two separate cohorts were included: 375 patients with advanced/unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh A class treated with first-line atezolizumab+bevacizumab from the AB-real study, and a non-HCC cohort including 459 patients treated with first-line ICI therapy from the INVIDIa-2 multicentre study. IrLI was defined as a treatment-related increase of aminotransferase levels after exclusion of alternative aetiologies of liver injury. The incidence of irLI was adjusted for the duration of treatment exposure., Results: In patients with HCC, the incidence of any grade irLI was 11.4% over a median treatment exposure of 4.4 months (95% CI 3.7-5.2) vs. 2.6% in the INVIDIa-2 cohort over a median treatment exposure of 12.4 months (95% CI 11.1-14.0). Exposure-adjusted-incidence of any grade irLI was 22.1 per 100-patient-years in patients with HCC and 2.1 per 100-patient-years in patients with other solid tumours (p <0.001), with median time-to-irLI of 1.4 and 4.7 months, respectively. Among patients who developed irLI, systemic corticosteroids were administered in 16.3% of patients with HCC and 75.0% of those without HCC (p <0.001), and irLI resolution was observed in 72.1% and 58.3%, respectively (p = 0.362). In patients with HCC, rates of hepatic decompensation and treatment discontinuation due to irLI were 7%. Grade 1-2 irLI was associated with improved overall survival only in patients with HCC (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.96)., Conclusions: Despite higher incidence and earlier onset, irLI in patients with HCC is characterised by higher rates of remission and lower requirement for corticosteroid therapy (vs. irLI in other solid tumours), low risk of hepatic decompensation and treatment discontinuation, not negatively affecting oncological outcomes., Impact and Implications: Immune-related liver injury (irLI) is common in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but whether irLI is more frequent or it is associated with a worse clinical course in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), compared to other tumours, is not known. Herein, we compared characteristics and outcomes of irLI in two prospective cohorts including patients treated with ICIs for HCC or for other oncological indications. irLI is significantly more common and it occurs earlier in patients with HCC, also after adjustment for duration of treatment exposure. However, outcomes of patients with HCC who developed irLI are not negatively affected in terms of requirement for corticosteroid therapy, hepatic decompensation, treatment discontinuation and overall survival., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

KRAS G12C mutation is prevalent in ~4% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Divarasib, a KRAS G12C inhibitor, has shown modest activity as a single agent in KRAS G12C-positive CRC at 400 mg. Epidermal growth factor receptor has been recognized as a major upstream activator of RAS-MAPK signaling, a proposed key mechanism of resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition in CRC. Here, we report on divarasib plus cetuximab (epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor) in patients with KRAS G12C-positive CRC (n = 29) from arm C of an ongoing phase 1b trial. The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Secondary objectives included preliminary antitumor activity. The safety profile of this combination was consistent with those of single-agent divarasib and cetuximab. Treatment-related adverse events led to divarasib dose reductions in four patients (13.8%); there were no treatment withdrawals. The objective response rate was 62.5% (95% confidence interval: 40.6%, 81.2%) in KRAS G12C inhibitor-naive patients (n = 24). The median duration of response was 6.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval: 5.5, 12.3). As an exploratory objective, we observed a decline in KRAS G12C variant allele frequency associated with response and identified acquired genomic alterations at disease progression that may be associated with resistance. The manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity of divarasib plus cetuximab support the further investigation of this combination in KRAS G12C-positive CRC.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04449874., (© 2023. Crown.)

Objectives: To understand the complex interaction of structural inequalities, co-occurring health conditions, and child undernutrition among the Adivasi population in North Kerala, India., Methods: A mixed-method approach was employed in this study, which combined a cross-sectional survey and a case study design. A multistage cluster sampling method was used to select 167 children aged 24 to 60 mo from the study population. The mothers of these children were interviewed using a structured questionnaire to assess individual, parental, and household-level factors associated with child undernutrition. Two Paniya settlements, one with a high prevalence of child undernutrition (HPS) and the other with a low prevalence (LPS), were chosen as the primary units of the case study., Results: The study found that the absence of a kitchen garden with fruits and vegetables [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-7.81] and a history of cough and fever (AOR 2.93; 95% CI: 1.24-6.93) were both associated with a higher risk of undernutrition in children. The case studies revealed that Adivasi children are undernourished due to a complex set of factors that persist throughout their lives, including unequal access to social capital, healthcare, and food security, as well as differences in hygiene practices due to the lack of access to clean water and sanitation., Conclusions: The findings underscore the need for social interventions to complement the current focus almost entirely on food supplementation programmes. Equitable action on Adivasi child malnutrition requires urgent policy and programmatic attention to social inequalities and access to basic amenities in Adivasi areas., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation.)

Purpose: To evaluate AZD4635, an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: In phase Ia (dose escalation), patients had relapsed/refractory solid tumors; in phase Ib (dose expansion), patients had checkpoint inhibitor-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer with prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure, or other solid tumors (checkpoint-naïve or prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure). Patients received AZD4635 monotherapy (75-200 mg once daily or 125 mg twice daily) or in combination with durvalumab (AZD4635 75 or 100 mg once daily). The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics; exploratory objectives included evaluation of an adenosine gene signature in patients with mCRPC., Results: As of September 8, 2020, 250 patients were treated (AZD4635, n = 161; AZD4635+durvalumab, n = 89). In phase Ia, DLTs were observed with monotherapy (125 mg twice daily; n = 2) and with combination treatment (75 mg; n = 1) in patients receiving nanosuspension. The most common treatment-related adverse events included nausea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, dizziness, and diarrhea. The RP2D of the AZD4635 capsule formulation was 75 mg once daily, as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab. The pharmacokinetic profile was dose-proportional, and exposure was adequate to cover target with 100 mg nanosuspension or 75 mg capsule once daily. In patients with mCRPC receiving monotherapy or combination treatment, tumor responses (2/39 and 6/37, respectively) and prostate-specific antigen responses (3/60 and 10/45, respectively) were observed. High versus low blood-based adenosine signature was associated with median progression-free survival of 21 weeks versus 8.7 weeks., Conclusions: AZD4635 monotherapy or combination therapy was well tolerated. Objective responses support additional phase II combination studies in patients with mCRPC., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) is globally treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Novel therapeutic strategies strive to not only optimize efficacy, but also limit toxicities. In MAHOGANY cohort A, margetuximab, an Fc-engineered, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was combined with retifanlimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 mAb, in the first-line HER2-positive/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive GEA., Patients and Methods: MAHOGANY cohort A part 1 is a single-arm trial to evaluate margetuximab plus retifanlimab in patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+, PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥1%), and non-microsatellite instability-high tumors. Primary objectives for cohort A were safety/tolerability and the confirmed objective response rate (ORR)., Results: As of 3 August 2021, 43 patients were enrolled and received margetuximab/retifanlimab. Nine grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in eight (18.6%) patients and eight serious TRAEs in seven (16.3%) patients. There were no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Three patients discontinued margetuximab/retifanlimab because of immune-related adverse events. The ORR by independent assessment was 53% [21/40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 36.1-68.5)], with a median duration of response of 10.3 months (95% CI 4.6-not evaluable); disease control rate was 73% [29/40 (95% CI 56.1-85.4)]. The study sponsor discontinued the study in advance of the planned enrollment when it became apparent that the study design would no longer meet the requirements for drug approval because of recent advances in the treatment of GEA., Conclusions: The chemotherapy-free regimen of combined margetuximab/retifanlimab as first-line treatment in double biomarker-selected patients demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile compared with historical outcomes using chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. The ORR observed in this study compares favorably versus ORR observed with other chemotherapy-free approaches., Competing Interests: Disclosure DVTC has received personal fees from Archer, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Five Prime Therapeutics, Foundation Medicine, Guardant Health, Tempus Labs, Genentech/Roche, Gritstone Oncology, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Natera, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, QED Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Zymeworks. YKK has received consulting fees from ALX Oncology, Amgen, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daehwa Pharmaceutical, MacroGenics, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis, Roche, Surface Oncology, and Zymeworks. HHY has received payments to the institution for grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck & Co., Inc.; consulting fees from ALX Oncology, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, MacroGenics, Merck & Co, Inc., Novartis, OncXerna Therapeutics, and Zymeworks; honoraria from BeiGene; and advisory board or data safety monitoring board payments from ALX Oncology, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, MacroGenics, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis, OncXerna Therapeutics, and Zymeworks. DYO has received grants from Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Lilly, HANDOK, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis, and Servier Pharmaceuticals; and participated in advisory boards for ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Basilea Pharmaceutica, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Genentech/Roche, Halozyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Turning Point Therapeutics, and Zymeworks. AIS has received stock payments from Lilly; payments for leadership role from NEXT Oncology; honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, CytomX Therapeutics, Janssen Oncology, Merck, Novartis, and Takeda; and personal and institutional payments for advisory boards from Amgen, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gritstone Oncology, Incyte, Janssen Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, and Takeda; consulting fees from Amgen, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gritstone Oncology, Janssen Research and Development, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Merck & Co., Inc., Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, and Takeda; and grants and other support from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, Arch Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CytomX Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Gritstone Oncology, Ignyta, Incyte, Janssen Oncology, LAM Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, MacroGenics, MedImmune, Mirati Therapeutics, NewLink Genetics, Novartis, Plexxikon, Roche, Rubius Therapeutics, Takeda, and TrovaGene. SVU has participated in advisory boards for Array BioPharma, Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, Incyte, and Syros Pharmaceuticals; and grants to institution from AbbVie, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Atreca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, CicloMed, Evelo Biosciences, Exelixis, G1 Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, IGM Biosciences, Incyte, Isofol Medical, KLUS Pharma, MacroGenics, Merck & Co., Inc., Mersana Therapeutics, OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Revolution Medicines, Synermore Biologics, Takeda, Tarveda Therapeutics, Tesaro, Tempest Therapeutics, and Vigeo Therapeutics. EJA has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Seagen, AbbVie, and Lilly; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen Biotech, and McKesson. PMB has received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck; grants/research support to institution from Ipsen, Processa Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, MacroGenics, Merck, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Athenex. JC has received consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Foundation Medicine, Lilly, MacroGenics, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Silverback Therapeutics, and Turning Point Therapeutics; speaker’s bureau honorarium from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck and Co., Inc.; data safety monitoring board member fees from Yiviva; and research payments to the institution from Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, MacroGenics, and Merck & Co., Inc. HCC received grants/research support from Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb/Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Amgen, BeiGene, Incyte, and Zymeworks; received honoraria from Lilly and Merck Serono; and did consultation for Amgen, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Gloria Therapeutics, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Serono, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Zymeworks. FG has received consulting fees for participating on advisory boards from Janssen, Epizyme, and Regeneron/Sanofi; speaker’s bureau honorarium from Epizyme, Regeneron/Sanofi, and Pfizer. SJK has received consulting fees for participating on advisory boards from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Merck & Co., Inc., Natera, and Pieris Pharmaceuticals; and stock options from Turning Point Therapeutics. KWL has received consulting fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and ISU ABXIS; honorarium from Boryung Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical; and research grants to the institution from ABL Bio, ALX Oncology, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Five Prime Therapeutics, Genexine, Green Cross Corp, InventisBio, Leap Therapeutics, LSK BioPharma, MacroGenics, MedPacto, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Oncologie, Pharmacyclics, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Seagen, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Trishula Therapeutics, Y-Biologics, and Zymeworks for conducting clinical trials. JP has received honoraria from Agendia, Guardant Health, and Tempus; consulting fees from TerSera Therapeutics; research funding for clinical trials from AbbVie, BerGenBio, Calithera Biosciences, Inc, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Epizyme, Genentech/Roche, Immunity Bio, Immutep S.A.S., Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jounce Therapeutics, Lilly, KeChow Pharma, Loxo Oncology, MacroGenics, Inc., Merck, Mirati, Natera, Novocure Ltd, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, TerSera Therapeutics, Turning Point Therapeutics, Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Immunomedics, Pfizer, and Kyowa Kirin; and owns stocks of Oncology Consultants, Zogen, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Roche, TerSera Therapeutics. LS has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Haichuang Pharmaceutical, Harbour BioMed, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., and Mingji Biopharmaceutical; speaker’s bureau fees from CStone Pharmaceuticals, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Hutchison Whampoa, and Zai Lab; participated on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Rongchang Pharmaceuticals, and Zai Lab; and grants to the institution from Beihai Kangcheng (Beijing) Medical Technology, Beijing Xiantong Biomedical Technology, Jacobio Pharmaceuticals, Qilu Pharmaceutical, and Zai Lab. MM has received grants and nonfinancial support from the AIO, BMBF, EORTC, and German Cancer Aid; personal fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Falk Foundation, Lilly, MGI Group, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer, Roche, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; grants to the institution from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., and Pfizer; and nonfinancial support from Amgen and Bristol Myers Squibb paid to the institution. JS, DL, and MKR are/were employees of MacroGenics and hold stock in the company. HP has received grants to institution from Adlai Nortye USA, Alpine Immune Sciences, Ambrx, Amgen, Aprea Therapeutics AB, Array BioPharma, Bayer, BeiGene, BJ Bioscience Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Elicio Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Hoffman-La Roche, Hutchison MediPharma, ImmuneOncia Therapeutics, Incyte, Jounce Therapeutics, MabSpace Biosciences, MacroGenics, MedImmune, Medivation, Merck & Co., Inc., Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Oncologie, Pfizer, PsiOxus Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Repare Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Synermore Biologics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, TopAlliance Biosciences, Turning Point Therapeutics, Vedanta Biosciences, and Xencor; writing support from MacroGenics; and participated in advisory boards for Jacobio Pharmaceuticals. BYS, STK, SCO, and MBS have declared no conflicts of interest. Data sharing The data collected for the study will not be made available to others., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Host factors play critical roles in SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated pathology and the severity of COVID-19. In this study, we systematically analyzed the roles of SARS-CoV-2-induced host factors, doublecortin-like kinase 1 (DCLK1), and S100A9 in viral pathogenesis. In autopsied subjects with COVID-19 and pre-existing chronic liver disease, we observed high levels of DCLK1 and S100A9 expression and immunosuppressive (DCLK1 + S100A9 + CD206 + ) M2-like macrophages and N2-like neutrophils in lungs and livers. DCLK1 and S100A9 expression were rarely observed in normal controls, COVID-19-negative subjects with chronic lung disease, or COVID-19 subjects without chronic liver disease. In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we detected 2 to 3-fold increased levels of circulating DCLK1 + S100A9 + mononuclear cells that correlated with disease severity. We validated the SARS-CoV-2-dependent generation of these double-positive immune cells in coculture. SARS-CoV-2-induced DCLK1 expression correlated with the activation of β-catenin, a known regulator of the DCLK1 promoter. Gain and loss of function studies showed that DCLK1 kinase amplified live virus production and promoted cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor secretion by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Inhibition of DCLK1 kinase blocked pro-inflammatory caspase-1/interleukin-1β signaling in infected cells. Treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells with inhibitors of DCLK1 kinase and S100A9 normalized cytokine/chemokine profiles and attenuated DCLK1 expression and β-catenin activation. In conclusion, we report previously unidentified roles of DCLK1 in augmenting SARS-CoV-2 viremia, inflammatory cytokine expression, and dysregulation of immune cells involved in innate immunity. DCLK1 could be a potential therapeutic target for COVID-19, especially in patients with underlying comorbid diseases associated with DCLK1 expression. IMPORTANCE High mortality in COVID-19 is associated with underlying comorbidities such as chronic liver diseases. Successful treatment of severe/critical COVID-19 remains challenging. Herein, we report a targetable host factor, DCLK1, that amplifies SARS-CoV-2 production, cytokine secretion, and inflammatory pathways via activation of β-catenin(p65)/DCLK1/S100A9/NF- κ B signaling. Furthermore, we observed in the lung, liver, and blood an increased prevalence of immune cells coexpressing DCLK1 and S100A9, a myeloid-derived proinflammatory protein. These cells were associated with increased disease severity in COVID-19 patients. Finally, we used a novel small-molecule inhibitor of DCLK1 kinase (DCLK1-IN-1) and S100A9 inhibitor (tasquinimod) to decrease virus production in vitro and normalize hyperinflammatory responses known to contribute to disease severity in COVID-19.

Introduction and objectives With such a huge country as Saudi Arabia, it would be expected to have variations in the pattern and incidence of breast diseases. This study aims to determine the recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among female patients treated in the Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region (AFHSR) from the period of January 2010 to December 2017. Methods This study is a retrospective chart review where all breast biopsy reports of female patients were seen between January 2010 and December 2017 at the AFHSR, Saudi Arabia, to observe the pattern of breast cancer as well as to calculate the incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among the study subjects. Results Overall, the incidence rates of breast cancer among female patients ranged between three to eight confirmed cases of breast cancer for every 1000 patients for the period of 2010 to 2017, where the highest incidence rate was reported in the year of 2017. Additionally, two distinct patterns are observed in breast cancer trends, i.e., the most common type of cancer was ductal carcinoma with an incidence percentage of 81.80%, followed by lobular carcinoma (3.40%). There was no statistical evidence that the associated population means of age are significantly different from the type of tumor characteristics. Conclusions In this study, the average age for diagnosed women with invasive breast cancer is about 56 years of age while in situ is 51 years. Among women of all age groups, ductal carcinoma is the most common. There is also an increase in the incidence of breast cancer between 2016 to 2017, where the highest incidence rate was reported in the year 2017. Continued vigilance, mammographic screening, and patient education are needed to establish an early diagnosis and perform the optimal treatment., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020, Asiri et al.)

Objectives: Squamous metaplasia is commonly detected in pancreatic parenchyma; however, primary pancreatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare malignancy with unknown incidence and unclear prognosis., Methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries were examined identifying pancreatic SCC and adenocarcinoma cases from 2000 to 2012. Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. Patients with SCC versus adenocarcinoma were compared by clinical features and relative survival outcomes., Results: We identified 214 patients with SCC and 72,860 with adenocarcinoma. For SCC, incidence rates tripled between 2000 and 2012. Significantly higher SCC incidence rates were observed in older age groups, blacks, and males. Greater proportion of patients with SCC than those with adenocarcinoma had poorly differentiated histology (73.0% vs 43.7%, P < 0.001). In both subtypes, majority of patients had stage IV disease, 59.0% for adenocarcinoma versus 62.6% for SCC. The 1- and 2-year relative survival rate was significantly lower in patients with SCC versus adenocarcinoma. The 1-year relative survival was 14.0% (95% confidence interval, 9.5%-19.4%) for SCC, compared with 24.5% (95% confidence interval, 24.2%-24.8%) for adenocarcinoma., Conclusions: Although primary pancreatic SCC is a rare neoplasm, incidence rates for this subtype are increasing. Relative to adenocarcinoma, pancreatic SCC is characterized by poorly differentiated histology and worse survival.

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is a potent oncogene that is found to be dysregulated in 30% of human cancer, including colorectal carcinogenesis (CRC). ISIS 183750 is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) designed to inhibit the production of the eIF4E protein. In preclinical studies we found that EIF4e ASOs reduced expression of EIF4e mRNA and inhibited proliferation of colorectal carcinoma cells. An additive antiproliferative effect was observed in combination with irinotecan. We then performed a clinical trial evaluating this combination in patients with refractory cancer. No dose-limiting toxicities were seen but based on pharmacokinetic data and tolerability the dose of irinotecan was reduced to 160 mg/m(2) biweekly. Efficacy was evaluated in 15 patients with irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer. The median time of disease control was 22.1 weeks. After ISIS 183750 treatment, peripheral blood levels of eIF4E mRNA were decreased in 13 of 19 patients. Matched pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies showed decreased eIF4E mRNA levels in five of nine patients. In tumor tissue, the intracellular and stromal presence of ISIS 183750 was detected by IHC in all biopsied patients. Although there were no objective responses stable disease was seen in seven of 15 (47%) patients who were progressing before study entry, six of whom were stable at the time of the week 16 CT scan. We were also able to confirm through mandatory pre- and posttherapy tumor biopsies penetration of the ASO into the site of metastasis., (© 2016 UICC.)

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence has been increasing in the United States for several decades; and, as the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection declines and the prevalence of metabolic disorders rises, the proportion of HCC attributable to various risk factors may be changing., Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linkage were used to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) for each risk factor over time. Patients with HCC (n = 10,708) who were diagnosed during the years 2000 through 2011 were compared with a 5% random sample of cancer-free controls (n = 332,107) residing in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results areas. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and PAFs were calculated for HCV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), metabolic disorders, alcohol-related disorders, smoking, and genetic disorders., Results: Overall, the PAF was greatest for metabolic disorders (32%), followed by HCV (20.5%), alcohol (13.4%), smoking (9%), HBV (4.3%), and genetic disorders (1.5%). The PAF for all factors combined was 59.5%. PAFs differed by race/ethnicity and sex. Metabolic disorders had the largest PAF among Hispanics (PAF, 39.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.9%-46.7%) and whites (PAF, 34.8%; 95% CI, 33.1%-36.5%), whereas HCV had the largest PAF among blacks (PAF, 36.1%; 95% CI, 31.8%-40.4%) and Asians (PAF, 29.7%; 95% CI, 25.9%-33.4%). Between 2000 and 2011, the PAF of metabolic disorders increased from 25.8% (95% CI, 22.8%-28.9%) to 36% (95% CI, 33.6%-38.5%). In contrast, the PAFs of alcohol-related disorders and HCV remained stable., Conclusions: Among US Medicare recipients, metabolic disorders contribute more to the burden of HCC than any other risk factor, and the fraction of HCC caused by metabolic disorders has increased in the last decade. Cancer 2016;122:1757-65. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.., (Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

Background: Endoglin is an endothelial cell membrane receptor essential for angiogenesis and highly expressed on the vasculature of many tumor types, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TRC105 is a chimeric IgG1 anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody that inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth by endothelial cell growth inhibition, ADCC and apoptosis, and complements VEGF inhibitors., Objective: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy of anti-endoglin therapy with TRC105 in patients with advanced HCC, post-sorafenib., Methods: Patients with HCC and compensated liver function (Childs-Pugh A/B7), ECOG 0/1, were enrolled to a single-arm, phase II study of TRC105 15 mg/kg IV every two weeks. Patients must have progressed on or been intolerant of prior sorafenib. A Simon optimal two-stage design was employed with a 50% four-month PFS target for progression to the second stage. Correlative biomarkers evaluated included DCE-MRI as well as plasma levels of angiogenic biomarkers and soluble CD105., Results: A total accrual of 27 patients was planned. However, because of lack of efficacy and in accordance with the Simon two-stage design, 11 patients were enrolled. There were no grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities. Most frequent toxicities were headache (G2; N = 3) and epistaxis (G1; N = 4). One patient had a confirmed partial response by standard RECIST criteria and biologic response on DCE-MRI but the four-month PFS was insufficient to proceed to the second stage of the study., Conclusions: TRC105 was well tolerated in this HCC population following sorafenib. Although there was evidence of clinical activity, this did not meet prespecified criteria to proceed to the second stage. TRC105 development in HCC continues as combination therapy with sorafenib.