Search

Promoting the sub-national ownership of national health initiatives is essential for efforts to achieve national health goals in federal systems where sub-national governments are semi-autonomous. Between 2008 and 2015, Nigerian government implemented a pilot free maternal and child health (MCH) programme in selected states to improve MCH by reducing physical and financial barriers of access to services. This study was conducted to better understand why the programme was neither adopted nor scaled-up by sub-national governments after pilot phase.We conducted a qualitative evaluation of the programme in Imo and Niger States, with data from programme documents, in-depth interviews (45) and focus group discussions (16) at State and community levels. Data was analysed using manual thematic coding approach.Our analysis indicates that the programme design had two mutually dependent goals, which were also in tension with one another: 1. To ensure programme performance, the designers sought to shield its implementation from sub-national government politics and bureaucracy; and 2. To gain the buy-in of the same sub-national government politicians and bureaucrats, the designers sought to demonstrate programme performance. The potential for community advocacy for sub-national adoption and scale-up was not considered in the design. Therefore, limited involvement of sub-national governments in the programme design limited sub-national ownership during implementation. And limited oversight of implementation by sub-national government policymakers limited programme performance.Efforts to promote sub-national ownership of national initiatives in decentralised health systems should prioritise inclusiveness in design, implementation, and oversight, and well-resourced community advocacy to sub-national governments for adoption and scale-up.

ObjectivesThis study explored the perceptions of adult stakeholders on adolescents sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs, variations of perceived needs by different social stratifiers and adolescent’s perceived interventions to address these needs. This will provide evidence that could be useful for policy and programme reviews for improving access and use of services in to meet the SRH needs of adolescents.DesignA qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted in Ebonyi state, Southeast, Nigeria. Data were analysed using thematic framework and content analysis approaches.Setting and participantsThis qualitative study was conducted in six selected local government areas in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. The study participants comprised of adult stakeholders including community leaders, adolescent boys and girls aged 13–18 years. Adolescents were purposively selected from schools, skill acquisition centres and workplaces. A total of 77 in-depth interviews, 6 (with community leaders) and 12 (with adolescents) focus group discussions were conducted using pretested question guides.ResultsAdolescent SRH needs were perceived to be unique and special due to their vulnerability, fragility and predisposition to explore new experiences. Recurring adolescent SRH needs were: SRH education and counselling; access to contraceptive services and information. These needs were perceived to vary based on sex, schooling and marital status. Adolescent girls were perceived to have more psychological needs, and more prone to negative health outcomes. Out-of-school adolescents were described as more vulnerable, less controlled, less supervised and more prone to sexual abuse. Unmarried adolescents were perceived more vulnerable to sexual exploitation and risks, while married were perceived to have more maternal health service needs.ConclusionsPerceptions of adolescents’ SRH needs converge among stakeholders (including adolescents) and are thought to vary by gender, schooling and marital status. This calls for well-designed gender-responsive interventions that also take into consideration other social stratifiers and adolescent’s perceived SRH intervention strategies.

Background: Studies evaluating data quality are needed to better identify what interventions might improve the quality of routine immunization (RI) data and use in decision-making. This study evaluated the outcomes of interventions that were implemented to improve the quality and use of RI data for decision-making in Enugu state, Nigeria.Methods: The study was conducted in six local government areas (LGAs) of Enugu State, Nigeria using a cross-sectional, qualitative design. Data was collected through semi-structured in-depth phenomenological interviews. Twenty-one interviews were conducted with purposively selected RI stakeholders including: State-level programme managers (n=3), primary healthcare coordinators (n=6), LGA RI officers (n=6) and facility RI focal persons (n=6). Acceptability, adoption, and feasibility dimensions of the Proctor et al framework was used to assess the interventions, which were 1). data review meetings; and 2). data-focused supervision. The self-selected changes in data management practices including ‘tally as you vaccinate’, ‘adherence to reporting timeline’, ‘use of demographic information to set target’, ‘use of local alternatives to archive paper records’, ‘updating monitoring chart’, and ‘data use in health facilities’ were also evaluated. Data were coded and analysed thematically using NVivo software version 11. Findings: Most participants accepted and adopted the interventions and self-selected data management practices. However, their feasibility depended on context-specific issues. Unpredictable funding undermined the feasibility of implementing the interventions. Resistance among health workers constrained ‘tally as you vaccinate’ due to staff shortage, long waiting time and staff unwillingness to use Open Data Kit mobile data application. Adherence to reporting timeline was constrained by irregular funding, inadequate staffing, and lack of computers. Use of inappropriate denominators constrained target setting by health facilities. Health workers used baskets in place of cupboards and shelves to archive paper-based records. Delayed supplies limited updating monitoring of charts, while mentoring enhanced it. Self-reported use of data for decision-making was facilitated by demand by health facility committees but constrained by inadequate staffing and lack of funds.Conclusion: The intervention improved acceptability and adoption of self-selected changes in immunisation data management practices. Nevertheless, the feasibility of sustaining the practices required decision-makers to address contextual limitations identified in this study.

To determine the population groups that benefit from a Free Maternal and Child Health (FMCH) programme in Enugu State, South-east Nigeria, so as to understand the equity effects of the programme.A community-based survey was conducted in rural and urban local government areas (LGAs) to aid the benefit incidence analysis (BIA) of the FMCH. Data were elicited from 584 randomly selected women of childbearing age. Data on their level of utilisation of FMCH services and their out-of-pocket expenditures on various FMCH services that they utilised were elicited. Benefits of the FMCH were valued using the unit cost of providing services while the net benefit was calculated by subtracting OOP expenditures made for services from the value of benefits. Costs were calculated in local currency (Naira (₦)) and converted to US Dollars. The net benefits were disaggregated by urban-rural locations and socio-economic status (SES). Concentration indices were computed to provide the level of SES inequity in BIA of FMCH.The total gross benefit incidence was ₦2.681 million ($7660). The gross benefit that was consumed by the urban dwellers was ₦1.581 million ($4517.1), while the rural dwellers consumed gross benefits worth ₦1.1 million ($3608.20). However, OOP expenditure for the supposedly FMCH was ₦6 527 580 (US$18 650.2) in the urban area, while it was ₦3, 194, 706 (US$ 9127.7) among rural dwellers. There was negative benefit incidence for the FMCH because the OOP exceeded the gross benefits at the point of use of services. There was no statistically significant difference in the benefit incidence and OOP expenditure between the urban and rural dwellers and across socio-economic groups.The distribution of the gross benefits of the FMCH programme indicates that it may not have achieved the desired aim of enhanced access particularly to the low-income population. Crucially, the high level of OOP erased whatever societal gain the FMCH was developed to provide. Hence, there is a need to review its implementation and re-strategise to reduce OOP and achieve greater access for improved effectiveness of the programme.Déterminer les groupes de population qui bénéficient d'un programme de santé maternelle et infantile gratuite (F-MCH) dans l'Etat d'Enugu, dans le sud-est du Nigéria, afin de comprendre les effets du programme sur l'équité. MÉTHODE: Une enquête communautaire a été menée dans des zones locales gouvernementales (ZLG) rurales et urbaines pour faciliter l'analyse de l'incidence des bénéfices (AIB) du F-MCH. Des données ont été obtenues auprès de 584 femmes en âge de procréer sélectionnées aléatoirement. Les données sur leur niveau d'utilisation des services F-MCH et leurs dépenses directes de la poche (DDP) pour divers services F-MCH qu'elles ont utilisé ont été obtenues. Les bénéfices du F-MCH ont été évalués en utilisant le coût unitaire de la prestation des services, tandis que le bénéfice net a été calculé en soustrayant les dépenses directes de la poche pour les services de la valeur des bénéfices. Les coûts ont été calculés en monnaie locale (Naira ₦) et convertis en dollars américains USD. Les bénéfices nets ont été ventilés par endroits urbain-rural et par statut socioéconomique (SSE). Les indices de concentration ont été calculés pour fournir le niveau d'iniquité du SSE dans l’AIB du F-MCH. RÉSULTATS: L'incidence des prestations brutes totales était de ₦ 2.681.000 (7.660 USD). Le bénéfice brut qui a été consommé par les habitants des villes était de ₦ 1.581.000 (4.517,1 USD), tandis que les habitants ruraux ont consommé une valeur de bénéfices bruts de ₦ 1,1 million (3,608.20 USD). Cependant, les DDP pour le soi-disant F-MCH étaient de 6.527.580 ₦ (18.650,2 USD) dans la zone urbaine, alors qu'elles étaient de 3 194 706 ₦ (9.127,7 USD) parmi les habitants des zones rurales. Il y avait une incidence négative des bénéfices pour le F-MCH parce que les DDP dépassaient les bénéfices bruts au point d'utilisation des services. Il n'y avait pas de différence statistiquement significative dans l'incidence des bénéfices et les DDP entre les habitants des zones urbaines et rurales et entre les groupes socioéconomiques.La répartition des bénéfices bruts du programme F-MCH indique qu'il n'a peut-être pas atteint l'objectif souhaité d'un accès amélioré, en particulier pour la population à faible revenu. Fondamentalement, le niveau élevé de dépenses directes de la poche a effacé tout gain sociétal que le F-MCH avait été développé pour fournir. Par conséquent, il est nécessaire de revoir sa mise en œuvre et de revoir sa stratégie pour réduire les DDP et obtenir un meilleur accès pour une efficacité accrue du programme.

Objectives: Nigeria has the second largest number of adolescents and young people living with HIV/AIDS in the world. Misconceptions about HIV/AIDS contribute to spread of HIV, and constrain uptake of preventive services. This paper explored misconceptions about HIV/AIDS among adolescents in south-east Nigeria. A qualitative study was conducted in six urban and rural local government areas of Ebonyi state. Data were collected through twelve focus group discussions (FGD) with unmarried adolescents aged 13-18 who were either attending school or out-of-school. The FGDs were conducted using a pre-tested topic guide. Data were coded manually and analyzed using a thematic framework approach.Results: There are persistent misconceptions about transmission of HIV/AIDS through mosquito bites and sharing of personal belongings. Some adolescents had inaccurate notions that a HIV infected person could be identified through changes in physical features such as abdominal swelling and longer fingernails. A few of them also reported that HIV could be treated with antibiotics. These misconceptions were expressed by both male and female adolescents. Adolescents have some mistaken beliefs about HIV/AIDS which constrain them from taking necessary preventive measures. Hence, the need to target adolescents with health education interventions on HIV/AIDS.

Despite increasing attention to implementation research in global health, evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using realist evaluations, in understanding how complex health programmes work remains limited. This paper contributes to bridging this knowledge gap by reporting how, why and in what circumstances, the implementation and subsequent termination of a maternal and child health programme affected the trust of service users and healthcare providers in Nigeria. Key documents were reviewed, and initial programme theories of how context triggers mechanisms to produce intended and unintended outcomes were developed. These were tested, consolidated and refined through iterative cycles of data collection and analysis. Testing and validation of the trust theory utilized eight in-depth interviews with health workers, four focus group discussions with service users and a household survey of 713 pregnant women and analysed retroductively. The conceptual framework adopted Hurley's perspective on ‘decision to trust’ and Straten et al.‘s framework on public trust and social capital theory. Incentives offered by the programme triggered confidence and satisfaction among service users, contributing to their trust in healthcare providers, increased service uptake, motivated healthcare providers to have a positive attitude to work, and facilitated their trust in the health system. Termination of the programme led to most service users' dissatisfaction, and distrust reflected in the reduction in utilization of MCH services, increased staff workloads leading to their decreased performance although residual trust remained. Understanding the role of trust in a programme's short and long-term outcomes can help policymakers and other key actors in the planning and implementation of sustainable and effective health programmes. We call for more theory-driven approaches such as realist evaluation to advance understanding of the implementation of health programmes in LMICs.

BackgroundGetting evidence from Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) into policy and practice for effective control of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) is essential for providing better service delivery because evidence-informed decision-making improves the effectiveness of a health system and health outcomes. The paper provides new knowledge on the policy-/decision-makers’ level of knowledge, capacity to use, and how evidence from HPSR has been used in decision-making for the control of endemic tropical diseases (ETDs), especially the NTDs and malaria in Nigeria.MethodsA cross-sectional qualitative study of decision-makers was undertaken in Anambra and Enugu states, southeast Nigeria. Data was collected through in-depth interviews (n=22) of purposively selected decision-makers to assess how HPSR evidence is translated into policy and practice for controlling ETDs. The respondents were selected based on their job description, roles, and involvement in the control of ETDs. Data were analyzed using the thematic content approach.ResultsThere is a considerable level of knowledge on HPSR and its relationship with evidence-informed policy- and decision-making towards control of ETDs and health system strengthening. Organizational capacity to use HPSR evidence in decision-making was found to be weak due to various reasons such as no embedded structure for translating research evidence to policy and practice, lack of decision-making autonomy by individuals, and politically driven decisions. Few respondents have either ever used or are currently using HPRS evidence for developing/reviewing and implementing strategies for ETDs programs. Majority of the respondents reported that their main source of evidence was routine data from health information management system, which they found useful due to its representativeness and completeness. Main enabler for using HPSR evidence for decision-making is existing collaborations between researchers and policy-/decision-makers.ConclusionThere is a high level of awareness about evidence from HPSR and the usefulness of such evidence in decision-making. However, this awareness does not translate to optimal use of evidence for decision-making due to weak organizational capacity and other constraints. There is the need to invest in capacity-building activities to develop a critical mass of users of evidence (policy-/decision-makers) to facilitate enhanced uptake of high-quality evidence into policy decisions for better control of ETDs.

IntroductionHealth care decision makers require capacity to demand and use research evidence for effective decision making. Capacity to undertake health policy and systems research (HPSR) and teaching is low in developing countries. Strengthening the capacity of producers and users of research is a more sustainable strategy for developing the field of HPSR in Africa, than relying on training in high-income countries.MethodsData were collected from 118 participants who had received the capacity building, using a pre-tested questionnaire. Respondents included health research scientists from institutions (producers) and decision makers (users) in the public health sector, in Anambra and Enugu states, southeast Nigeria. Data were collected on participants' progress with proposed group activities in their short- term goals; effects of these activities on evidence-informed decision making and constraints to implementing activities. Univariate analysis was done using SPSS version 16.FindingsAll prioritised activities were carried out. However, responses were low. Highest response for an activity amongst producers was 39.1%, and 44.4% for users. Some of the activities implemented positively influenced changes in practice; like modification of existing policies and programme plans. There was a wide range of responses between producers of evidence (0.0-39.1%) and users (2.7-44.4%) across both study states. Lack of authority to implement activities was the major constraint (42-9-100.0% across activities), followed by financial constraints (70.6%).ConclusionCapacity building intervention improved skills of a critical mass of research scientists, policymakers and practitioners, towards evidence-based decision making. Participants committed to undertake proposed activities but faced a number of constraints. These need to be addressed, especially the decision space and authority, improving funding to implement activities that influence Getting Research into Policy & Practice (GRIPP). Being at different stages of planning and implementing proposed activities; participants require continuous technical and financial support to successfully implement activities and engage meaningfully within and across professional boundaries and roles, in order to achieve short-, medium- and long- term goals.

Background: Many adolescents lack appropriate information about their sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Although there are numerous information on SRH, they vary in content and quality, and these have implications for the accuracy and appropriateness of SRH information adolescents can access. This study examined the sources of SRH information for adolescents, the value adolescents place on these sources and their significance for adolescent health programming.Method: This was a mixed methods, community-based, cross-sectional study that was conducted in six local government areas in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. Quantitative data were collected using pre-tested questionnaire that was administered to 1057 unmarried adolescents aged 13-18 years. The qualitative data were: Seventy-seven in-depth interviews (IDIs) with stakeholders; twelve (12) focus group discussions (FGDs) with adolescents; and six FGDs with village head. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed for quantitative data using Stata software while thematic framework approach was used to analyze qualitative data.Result: It was found that 60.5% and 39.8% of adolescents reported that school teachers and mothers respectively were their major sources of information about pubertal changes, while teachers (36.3%) and friends (29.8%) were the commonest sources of information on relationship with opposite sex. There were statistically significant associations between sources of information about relationships and age category (p≤0.09). Additional common sources of SRH information elicited through IDIs with adolescents include internet, social media and mass media. Although adolescents valued the information provided by teachers and parents, they preferred information on SRH from their friends/peers, social media and mass media because these sources are easy to access with a guarantee of some level of confidentiality. In the opinion of parents and other stakeholders, sources of appropriate SRH information for adolescents were health workers, teachers, parents and adult family members; whereas peers/friends and social media were considered as inappropriate sources of SRH information for adolescents.Conclusion: Efforts at addressing the need of adolescents for SRH information should be targeted at their valued and preferred sources, whilst maintaining a delicate balance with the choices and expectations of their parents and adult family members.

Background High rate of teenage pregnancy in Nigeria is potentially an indication of poor access to and utilization of contraceptives among this age group. This paper presents findings from in-depth exploration of perceived barriers to utilization of contraceptive services by adolescents. Methods A qualitative study was conducted in six communities in Ebonyi state, southeast Nigeria. Eighty-one in-depth interviews and six focus group discussions were conducted. Respondents comprised policy makers, community leaders, health service providers and parents of adolescents. Pre-tested interview guides were used to collect information on perceived barriers to utilization of contraceptive services by adolescents. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed in English. Data was analysed using thematic framework approach, and the socio-ecological model was adapted for data synthesis. Results Individual level factors that limit access to contraceptives for adolescents include lack of awareness and poor knowledge, fear of side effects, low self-esteem, and inability to afford cost of services. Interpersonal (family-related) barriers to access include poor parent-child communication of sexual and reproductive health matters and negative attitude of parents towards to sexuality education for adolescents. Health systems barriers to accessing contraceptives for adolescents include lack of privacy and confidentiality, stock-out of contraceptive commodities, judgmental attitude of health workers, insufficient staff that are skilled in adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Gendered cultural norms, societal shaming and religious intolerance also preclude adolescents from accessing and using contraceptive services. Wider societal factors such as negative peer and media influence, absence of sexuality education in schools, lack of social networks in communities; and macro level factors such as poor economic conditions were also perceived to limit access to contraceptives for adolescents. Conclusion Utilization of contraception is constrained by an interplay of factors acting at various levels. Addressing these barriers could contribute to improved access to contraceptive services for adolescents, as well as reduction in unwanted teenage pregnancy.

Background The need to build capacity for health policy and systems research (HPSR) in low- and middle-income countries has been underscored as this encompasses the processes of decision-making at all levels of the health system. This implementation research project was undertaken in Southeast Nigeria to evaluate whether the capacity-building intervention improves the capacity to produce and use research evidence for decision making in endemic disease control. Methods Three training workshops were organized for purposively selected participants comprising “producers of evidence” such as health research scientists in three universities and “users of evidence” such as policy makers, program managers, and implementers in the public health sector. Participants also held step-down workshops in their organizations. The last workshop was used to facilitate the formation of knowledge networks comprising of both producers and users, which is a critical step for getting research into policy and practice (GRIPP). Three months after the workshops, a subset, 40, of workshop participants was selected for in-depth interviews. Information was collected on (i) perceptions of usefulness of capacity-building workshops, (ii) progress with proposed research and research uptake activities, (iii) effects of these activities on evidence-informed decision making, and (iv) constraints and enablers to implementation of proposed activities. Results Most participants felt the workshops provided them with new competencies and skills in one or more of research priority setting, evidence generation, communication, and use for the control of endemic diseases. Participants were at different stages of planning and implementing their proposed research and research uptake activities, and were engaging across professional and disciplinary boundaries to ensure relevance and usefulness of outputs for decision making. Key enablers of successful implementation of activities were positive team dynamics, good balance of competencies, effective communication and engagement within teams, team leader’s capacity to innovate, and personal interests such as career progress. Lack of funding, limited decision space, organizational bureaucracies, and poor infrastructure were the key constraints to the implementation of proposed activities. Lack of mentorship and continuous support from trainers delayed progress with implementing proposed activities. Conclusions The capacity-building interventions contributed to the development of a critical mass of research scientists, policy makers, and practitioners who have varying levels of competencies in HPSR for endemic disease control and would require further support in carrying out their medium and long-term goals.

Additional file 1. In-depth interview guides for producers and users of evidence.

Background: A Free Maternal and Child Health program (FMCHP) was implemented in 12 states in Nigeria by the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), between 2009 and 2015, using funds from the debt relief gains. It was called the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) NHIS-MDG FMCHP. The program ended with the termination of the MDG in 2015. With the creation of the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) in Nigeria, this study sought to examine the past implementation experiences of the NHIS-MCH project with a view to identifying the enabling and constraining factors to program implementation, and the opportunities for adaptation and program scale-up in Nigeria using the BHCPF. Methods: The study was undertaken in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, and involved review of relevant documents and in-depth interviews with 21 key informants. The program was assessed in themes from the conceptual framework. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The program enrolled about 1.5 million pregnant women and children during the period of implementation in the country. The respondents perceived the program as pro-poor, efficient, and effective, and led to marked improvement in the functionality of the facilities, availability of services and reduced out-of-pocket expenditure, which led to increased demand and utilization of MCH services. There was inadequate stakeholder consultation, alleged corrupt practices, challenges with registration, issues with counterpart funding and public financing management issues identified. Most respondents supported the idea of using the new fund (BHCPF) to revitalize/scale-up the Free MCH program. Conclusion: This study highlights the key lessons and implementation challenges identified by the respondents. The NHIS-MDG FMCHP had positive impact on the target population though it was not sustained following the conclusion of the MDG program. The findings will inform policy decisions about the appropriateness of sustaining the program and the feasibility of extending healthcare coverage using the proposed BHCPF. The new fund (BHCPF) can be used to reactivate and scale-up the Free MCH program, but the current level of funding will not assure universal health coverage for the target beneficiaries as realized from the costing aspect of this study.

BackgroundThere is a current need to build the capacity of Health Policy and Systems Research + Analysis (HPSR+A) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) as this enhances the processes of decision-making at all levels of the health system. This paper provides information on the HPSR+A knowledge and practice among producers and users of evidence in priority setting for HPSR+A regarding control of endemic diseases in two states in Nigeria. It also highlights the HPSR+A capacity building needs and interventions that will lead to increased HPSR+A and use for actual policy and decision making by the government and other policy actors.MethodsData was collected from 96 purposively selected respondents who are either researchers/ academia (producers of evidence) and policy/decision-makers, programme/project managers (users of evidence) in Enugu and Anambra states, southeast Nigeria. A pre-tested questionnaire was the data collection tool. Analysis was by univariate and bivariate analyses.ResultsThe knowledge on HPSR+A was moderate and many respondents understood the importance of evidence-based decision making. Majority of researcher stated their preferred channel of dissemination of research finding to be journal publication. The mean percentage of using HPSR evidence for programme design & implementation of endemic disease among users of evidence was poor (18.8%) in both states. There is a high level of awareness of the use of evidence to inform policy across the two states and some of the respondents have used some evidence in their work.ConclusionThe high level of awareness of the use of HPSR+A evidence for decision making did not translate to the significant actual use of evidence for policy making. The major reasons bordered on lack of autonomy in decision making. Hence, the existing yawning gap in use of evidence has to be bridged for a strengthening of the health system with evidence.

[EXSCINDED] Abstract Background Adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health have an important influence on a country’s long-term national growth. There is high level of burden due to poor adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) in Nigeria, especially Ebonyi state. Evidence shows that in Sub-Saharan Africa region, most adolescents experience poor access to information and other services relating to their sexual and reproductive health. Many cultures in Africa see matters around sex and sexuality as social taboos. This study aimed to access variations in utilization of health facilities for sexual and reproductive health information and services among adolescents in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. This will inform the design of interventions to improve ASRH.Methods A total of 1057 in-school and out-of-school adolescents aged 13 to18 years were selected using cluster sampling of households from the 6 selected LGAs in this cross sectional survey. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics was performed alongside stratification analysis. Tabulation, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were undertaken. A household wealth index was calculated using the total household consumption calculated divided by the number of people in the households (per capital household consumption). The per capita household consumption was used to categorize households into socio-economic quintiles. The variable was used to differentiate where key variables into socio-economic quintile equity analysis.Results Majority of respondents had never visited any type of health facility to receive either SRH information (90.2%) or services (97.1%). Utilization rate of health facilities for SRH information was 9.8% while for other SRH services was 2.8%. Patent medicine vendor (PMV) was the most visited type of facility for SRH information and other services. Schooling is a strong predictor of health facilities’ utilization for SRH information (P