Search

The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.

Introduction: The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature., Methods: A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology., Conclusions: In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and have only recently been described based on their specific immunohistochemistry and the presence of particular kit-related mutations which potentially make them targets for tyrosine kinase inhibition. Most GISTs are respectable, with survival mainly depending upon mitotic count and completeness of resection. Our own and other studies suggest that, in locally advanced cases, complete surgical resection (R0 resection) and adjuvant molecular therapy with imatinib yield good outcomes in terms of survival and disease-free status at 12 and 18 months. This approach, in the light of such integrated surgical-molecular therapy and of the new pharmaceuticals currently under research, means that we can now offer a real chance of recovery and a longer survival period to patients even with advanced-stage illness or local recurrence.

Nowadays the laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the main surgical therapy in the treatment of cholecysto-lithiasis. At the beginning the treatment of cholecysto-choledochal lithiasis was the sequential endoscopic-laparoscopic therapy. In fact, the endoscopic sphincterotomy allows transpapillary ablation of Common Bile Duct (CBD) stones, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy completes the therapy. Recently we have brought the full-laparoscopic of CBD lithiasis. This has become possible on account of an improved intraoperative laparoscopic diagnostics and a better technical experience of the laparoscopic surgeon. Intraoperative examination of CBD requires suitable instruments: cholangiography is still a basic examination and now is easily performed in laparoscopy without a considerable increase of the surgical time; choledochoscopy allows an intraluminal inspection of completes the examination, supplying further detailed information. Afterwards the laparoscopic approach allows the transcystic ablation of stones, using a Dormia probe or through a choledochotomy, but is previously required for the surgeon a high-level operative and technical ability about laparoscopic surgery, in order to perform an excellent preparation of the CBD and precise stitches, making knots with extra corporeal or intra-abdominal technique. Clinical results in patients until now fully-laparoscopic treated are quite good and encourage the CBD lithiasis therapy by a mini-invasive approach, which has the advantage that's not requested the sacrifice of a sound papilla.

Results of a study using the treadmill test on 32 patients with peripheral Fontaine's stage II arterial disease are described. The aim of the study was to evaluate the utility of the test in assessing useful information concerning the site of the lesion. Patients were divided in three classes depending on the arterial segment involved (iliac-femoral, femoro-popliteal, associated lesions) as resulted from the velocimetric and angiographic evaluation. Ankle pressure and WI, at rest and after stress test, PFWD and RT were evaluated. The authors conclude that data achieved with the dynamic test are related to the arterial involvement, allowing to differentiate obstructive and stenotic lesions, but do not give information concerning the site of the lesion. Nevertheless it is a valuable means of highlighting arterial lesions well compensated at rest and with normal pressure values.