Search

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of the Deauville score (DS) in therapy response assessment and to define the prognostic value of the metabolic response of end of induction (EOI) [ 18 F]FDG PET (PET) in follicular lymphoma patients., Methods: Adult patients with untreated grade 1-3a FL/ stage II-IV enrolled in the multicentre, prospective, phase III FOLL12 trial (NCT02063685) were randomized to receive standard immunochemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance (standard arm) versus standard immunochemotherapy followed by response-adapted post-induction management (experimental arm). Baseline and EOI PET were mandatory for the study. All PET scans were centralized on the WIDEN® platform and classified according to DS in a blind independent central review. DS1-3 was considered negative (CMR), whereas DS4-5 was considered positive (not CMR). The primary endpoint was PFS. The main secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS)., Results: Overall, 807 follicular lymphoma patients-52% women, 89% stage III-IV disease, 40% with a high-risk FLIPI-2 score (3-5)-were enrolled in the study; 729 (90.4%) baseline and EOI PET were available for the analysis. EOI PET was positive (DS4-5) in 88/729 (12.1%) cases. Overall inter-reviewer agreement on PET pos/neg result was 0.92, while agreement on positive and negative cases was 0.77 and 0.94, respectively. The median follow-up was 69 months; 247 events were registered in the 5-yr follow-up, with a 5-yr PFS of 67% (95%CI: 63%-70%). The 5-yr PFS rate for PET neg (DS1-3) and PET pos (DS4-5) patients was 71% (95%CI: 67%-75%) and 36% (95%CI: 25%-46%), respectively, with HR 3.49 (95%CI: 2.57-4.72). Five-year PFS was worse as DS increased, with 74% (70%-78%), 58% (48%-67%; HR 1.71; p = 0.001)] and 36% (25%-46%; HR 3.88; p < 0.001) in DS1-2, DS3 and DS4-5, respectively. EOI PET maintained its prognostic value in both the standard and experimental arms. In the whole population, 5-yr OS was 94% (95%CI: 92%-96%), with 96% (95%CI: 94-97) and 82% (95%CI: 72%-89%) in EOI PET negative (DS1-3) and positive (DS4-5), respectively (HR 4.48; p < 0.001). When DS was associated with FLIPI-2, patients with DS3 or DS1-2 with high FLIPI-2 (3-5) experienced worse OS than patients with DS1-2 and low FLIPI-2 (1-2) (p = 0.003)., Conclusion: This study shows that DS is a reliable prognostic tool to evaluate EOI PET in follicular lymphoma patients, with prognostic value maintained both in the standard and experimental arms, making metabolic imaging a robust tool to assess response in FL. Moreover, although preliminary, this study provides further information on DS3 patients, who are considered as CMR but show a less favourable PFS than DS1-2 patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The role of consolidation radiotherapy in patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is controversial., Methods: The IELSG37 trial, a randomized noninferiority study, aimed to assess whether irradiation can be omitted in patients with PMBCL with complete metabolic response (CMR) after induction immunochemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 30 months after random assignment. Patients with CMR were randomly assigned to observation or consolidation radiotherapy (30 Gy). With a noninferiority margin of 10% (assuming a 30-month PFS of 85% in both arms), a sample size of 540 patients was planned with 376 expected to be randomly assigned., Results: The observed events were considerably lower than expected; therefore, primary end point analysis was conducted when ≥95% of patients were followed for ≥30 months. Of the 545 patients enrolled, 268 were in CMR after induction and were randomly assigned to observation (n = 132) or radiotherapy (n = 136). The 30-month PFS was 96.2% in the observation arm and 98.5% in the radiotherapy arm, with a stratified hazard ratio of 1.47 (95% CI, 0.34 to 6.28) and absolute risk difference of 0.68% (95% CI, -0.97 to 7.46). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99% in both arms. Nonrandomized patients were managed according to local policies. Radiotherapy was the only treatment in 86% of those with Deauville score (DS) 4 and in 57% of those with DS 5. The 5-year PFS and OS of patients with DS 4 (95.8% and 97.5%, respectively) were not significantly different from those of randomly assigned patients. Patients with DS5 had significantly poorer 5-year PFS and OS (60.3% and 74.6%, respectively)., Conclusion: This study, the largest randomized trial of radiotherapy in PMBCL, demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients achieving CMR with no survival impairment for those omitting irradiation.

Background: A standard of care and optimal duration of therapy have not been established for patients with multiply relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate epcoritamab, a novel CD3 × CD20 bispecific antibody, in the third-line and later setting of follicular lymphoma., Methods: EPCORE NHL-1 is a multicohort, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial conducted at 88 sites across 15 countries. Here, we report the primary analysis of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma in the phase 2 part of the trial, which included the pivotal (dose expansion) cohort and the cycle 1 optimisation cohort. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory CD20 + follicular lymphoma (grade 1-3A), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of up to 2, and had received at least two previous lines of therapy (including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an alkylating agent or lenalidomide). Patients were treated with subcutaneous epcoritamab 48 mg in 28-day cycles: weekly in cycles 1-3, biweekly in cycles 4-9, and every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. To mitigate the risk and severity of cytokine release syndrome, in the pivotal cohort, cycle 1 consisted of a step-up dosing regimen of a 0·16-mg priming dose on day 1 and a 0·80-mg intermediate dose on day 8, followed by subsequent 48-mg full doses and prophylactic prednisolone 100 mg; in the cycle 1 optimisation cohort, a second intermediate dose of 3 mg on day 15, adequate hydration, and prophylactic dexamethasone 15 mg were evaluated during cycle 1 to further reduce risk and severity of cytokine release syndrome. Primary endpoints were independently reviewed overall response rate for the pivotal cohort and the proportion of patients with grade 2 or worse and any-grade cytokine release syndrome for the cycle 1 optimisation cohort. Analyses were done in all enrolled patients who had received at least one dose of epcoritamab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03625037, and is ongoing., Findings: Between June 19, 2020, and April 21, 2023, 128 patients (median age 65 years [IQR 55-72]; 49 [38%] female and 79 [62%] male) were enrolled and treated in the pivotal cohort (median follow-up 17·4 months [IQR 9·1-20·9]). The overall response rate was 82·0% (105 of 128 patients; 95% CI 74·3-88·3), with a complete response rate of 62·5% (80 of 128; 95% CI 53·5-70·9). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse event was neutropenia in 32 (25%) of 128 patients. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome was reported in 83 (65%) of 128 patients; grade 3 cytokine release syndrome was reported in two (2%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in eight (6%) of 128 patients (five [4%] grade 1; three [2%] grade 2). Between Oct 25, 2022, and Jan 8, 2024, 86 patients (median age 64 years [55-71]; 37 [43%] female and 49 [57%] male) were enrolled and treated in the cycle 1 optimisation cohort. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome was 49% (42 of 86 patients; eight [9%] grade 2; none of grade 3 or worse), with no reported immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome., Interpretation: Epcoritamab monotherapy showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with multiply relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, and had a manageable safety profile., Funding: Genmab and AbbVie., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KML declares being a member of the Epcoritamab Global Council on behalf of Genmab; a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, BeiGene, BMS, Genmab, Kite/Gilead, and Roche; participation in speakers bureaus from AbbVie and BMS; research funding (paid to institution) from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, CellCentric, Genmab, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, MorphoSys, MSD, Nurix, Regeneron, Roche, Step Pharma, and Viracta; and travel expenses from BMS. UV declares participation on an advisory board for AbbVie, Bayer, Genmab, Gilead, and Novartis; and lecture fees from AbbVie, Incyte, Janssen, Regeneron, Roche, and Servier. WJ declares research funding and consultancy fees from AbbVie and Roche. PJL declares research grants from Takeda and Servier; advisory honoraria from BMS, Roche, Takeda, Genmab, AbbVie, Incyte, Regeneron, and Sandoz; and consultancy honoraria from Y-mAbs Therapeutics. EG declares congress or travel fees or hospitality from AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Roche, and Sanofi; research funding from MSD, Novartis, Sandoz, and Sanofi; is a coordinating investigator for industry-sponsored studies for Astellas, Pharmacyclics, and Roche; and has received honoraria from Alexion, BMS, EUSA Pharma, Gilead, Jazz Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi. AS declares consultancy for Takeda, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi, Kite, and Mundipharma; honoraria from Takeda, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi, and Kite; membership on board of directors or advisory committee for Takeda, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Amgen, Bluebird, Sanofi, and Kite; travel expenses from Takeda, BMS, and Roche; research funding from Takeda; and participation in speakers bureaus for Takeda, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi, and Kite. BH declares membership on board of directors or advisory committee for ADC Therapeutics and BMS. HT declares membership on board of directors or advisory committee for ADC Therapeutics, BMS, and Roche; honoraria from Roche; and research funding from Roche. RC declares consultancy for AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Kite, BMS, Genmab, Roche, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, BeiGene, and Lilly; participation in speakers bureaus for AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Kite, BMS, Roche, and Takeda; and research funding from Pfizer. DJL declares participation on advisory boards and consultancy for Janssen, Lilly, Roche, BeiGene, and Kite. MH declares participation on scientific advisory boards for AbbVie, BMS, Genmab, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda; and research support (paid to institution) from BMS, Genentech, Genmab, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. MRC declares consultancy for AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Genmab, and Incyte; participation on advisory boards for AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead, and Genmab; and travel expenses from AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Genmab, Roche, and Pfizer. J-MS declares consultancy or an advisory role for AbbVie, BeiGene, BMS, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Novartis, and Roche; and speaker honoraria from AbbVie, BeiGene, BMS, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche. TC declares research funding from BeiGene; and participation in a speakers bureau for Janssen-Cilag. SL declares membership on board of directors or advisory committee for BeiGene, Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Novartis, Orion, and Roche; research funding (paid to institution) from Bayer, BMS, Genmab, Hutchmed, Novartis, Nordic Nanovector, and Roche; and honoraria from Gilead, Incyte, and Novartis. MEDC declares consultancy for AbbVie, Novartis, and Sanofi; and research funding from BMS, Gilead, and Genmab. DG, YL, DH, and EF are current employees of Genmab. IA and TA are current employees of Genmab and hold stock or options in Genmab. MHD is a current employee of AbbVie. BE is a current employee of Genmab and holds patents and royalties (P158-US-PSP3). CT declares research funding from BMS, Hospira, and Roche; consultancy for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Cellectis, Gilead, Kite, Novartis, and Roche; honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Cellectis, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Kite, Novartis, and Takeda; membership on board of directors or advisory committee for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Cellectis, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Kite, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda; and travel expenses from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Cellectis, Gilead, Kite, Novartis, and Roche. JMV declares research funding from Epizyme, Genmab, and Loxo; and consultancy for Adaptive, Genmab, and Ono. All other authors declare no competing interests., (2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Abstract: Primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PTL) is characterized by high risk of contralateral testis and central nervous system (CNS) relapse. Chemoimmunotherapy with intrathecal (IT) CNS prophylaxis and contralateral testis irradiation eliminates contralateral recurrences and reduces CNS relapses. The IELSG30 phase 2 study investigated feasibility and activity of an intensified IT and IV CNS prophylaxis. Patients with stage I/II PTL who had not received treatment received 2 cycles of IV high-dose methotrexate (MTX) (1.5 g/m2) after 6 cycles of the R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, every 21 days). IT liposomal cytarabine was administered on day 0 of cycles 2 to 5 of 21-day R-CHOP regimen. Contralateral testis radiotherapy (25-30 Gy) was recommended. Fifty-four patients (median age: 66 years) with stage I (n = 32) or II (n = 22) disease were treated with R-CHOP, 53 received at least 3 doses of IT cytarabine, 48 received at least 1 dose of IV MTX, and 50 received prophylactic radiotherapy. No unexpected toxicity occurred. At a median follow-up of 6 years, there was no CNS relapse; 7 patients progressed, and 8 died, with 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-96) and 92% (95% CI, 81-97), respectively. Extranodal recurrence was documented in 6 patients (in 2 without nodal involvement). In 4 cases, the relapse occurred >6 years after treatment. Causes of death were lymphoma (n = 4), second primary malignancy (n = 1), cerebral vasculopathy (n = 1), unknown (n = 2). Intensive prophylaxis was feasible and effective in preventing CNS relapses. Late relapses, mainly at extranodal sites, represented the most relevant pattern of failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00945724., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Optimal consolidation for young patilents with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) remains uncertain in the rituximab era, with an unclear benefit of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The multicenter, randomized, phase III FLAZ12 (NCT01827605) trial compared anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with ASCT as consolidation after chemoimmunotherapy, both followed by rituximab maintenance., Patients and Methods: Patients (age 18-65 years) with R/R FL and without significant comorbidities were enrolled and treated with three courses of conventional, investigator-chosen chemoimmunotherapies. Those experiencing at least a partial response were randomized 1 : 1 to ASCT or RIT before CD34+ collection, and all received postconsolidation rituximab maintenance. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The target sample size was 210 (105/group)., Results: Between August 2012 and September 2019, of 164 screened patients, 159 were enrolled [median age 57 (interquartile range 49-62) years, 55% male, 57% stage IV, 20% bulky disease]. The study was closed prematurely because of low accrual. Data were analyzed on 8 June 2023, on an intention-to-treat basis, with a 77-month median follow-up from enrollment. Of the 141 patients (89%), 70 were randomized to ASCT and 71 to RIT. The estimated 3-year PFS in both groups was 62% (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.80, P = 0.6662). The 3-year overall survival also was similar between the two groups. Rates of grade ≥3 hematological toxicity were 94% with ASCT versus 46% with RIT (P < 0.001), and grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 94% versus 41%, respectively (P < 0.001). Second cancers occurred in nine patients after ASCT and three after radioimmunotherapy (P = 0.189)., Conclusions: Even if prematurely discontinued, our study did not demonstrate the superiority of ASCT versus RIT. ASCT was more toxic and demanding for patients and health services. Both strategies yielded similar, favorable long-term outcomes, suggesting that consolidation programs milder than ASCT require further investigation in R/R FL., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The Lugano 2014 criteria are the standard for response assessment in lymphoma. We compared the prognostic performance of Lugano 2014 and the more recently developed response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017), which relies primarily on computed tomography and uses unidimensional measurements, in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials, respectively. Concordance between responses according to the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 criteria was analyzed. Landmark analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by end of treatment (EOT) and end of induction (EOI) response status according to RECIL 2017 and Lugano 2014 criteria, and prognostic value of response at EOT/EOI were also compared. Overall, 1333 patients were included from GOYA and 502 from GALLIUM. Complete response (CR) status according to RECIL 2017 criteria showed high concordance with complete metabolic response (CMR) status by Lugano 2014 criteria in both GOYA (92.5%) and GALLIUM (92.4%). EOT and EOI CR/CMR status by both criteria was highly prognostic for PFS in GOYA (RECIL 2017 [CR]: hazard ratio [HR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.46]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.26-0.48]; both p  < .0001) and GALLIUM (RECIL 2017 [CR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.23-0.53]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.21 [95% CI 0.14-0.31]; both p  < .0001). In conclusion, response categorization by RECIL 2017 is similar to that by Lugano 2014 criteria, with high concordance observed. Both were prognostic for PFS and OS., Competing Interests: Lale Kostakoglu is a consultant at F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc. and reports consulting and honoraria fees from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Maurizio Martelli has served on a consulting and advisory board and speaker's bureau for F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Janssen, Novartis, Gilead Sciences and Sandoz; and reports travel, accommodations and other expenses from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Laurie H. Sehn reports research funding from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc. and consulting and honoraria fees from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc., AbbVie, Amgen, Apobiologix, Acerta, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Karyopharm, Lundbeck, Merck, MorphoSys, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Teva, TG Therapeutics and Verastem. Andrew Davies reports research funding from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc, AstraZeneca/Acerta Pharma, MSD and consulting and honoraria fees from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc., AbbVie, Acerta/AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genmab, Gilead Sciences, Kite Pharma and Incyte. Marek Trněný reports honoraria and consulting fees from Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Bristol‐Meyers Squibb, Amgen, AbbVie, Takeda, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, MorphoSys and Incyte; consulting for Celgene; and travel, accommodation and other expenses from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Bristol‐Meyers Squibb, Takeda, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd and Janssen. Michael Herold reports a consultancy/advisory role with Celgene, Gilead and F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd and research funding from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Umberto Vitolo reports a consulting or advisory role for Janssen, Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Genmab and Incyte; speaker's bureau fees from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Janssen, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Servier and AbbVie; research funding from Celgene; and travel, accommodations or other expenses from Celgene, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd and AbbVie. Wolfgang Hiddemann reports honoraria from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Janssen, Gilead Sciences and Celgene; a consulting/advisory role for F. Hoffman‐La Roche Ltd, Janssen and Gilead Sciences; speakers’ bureau for F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Janssen and Gilead Sciences; research funding from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Janssen and Bayer; and travel expenses/accommodation from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Janssen and Gilead Sciences. Judith Trotman reports research funding from F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, BMS, BeiGene, Pharmacyclics, Janssen and Cellectar. Andrea Knapp is employed by and has equity ownership interests in F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Federico Mattiello is an employee of F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Tina G. Nielsen is an employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Deniz Sahin is an employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Gila Sellam is an employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Carol Ward is an employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. Anas Younes is employed by and has stock and other ownership interests in AstraZeneca; has received honoraria from Merck, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Takeda, Janssen, AbbVie, Curis and Epizyme; reports a consulting or advisory role with Bio‐Path Holdings Inc, Xynomic Pharma, Epizyme, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Celgene and HCM; has received research funding from Janssen, Curis, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc., Merck, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Syndax; and other relationship with AstraZeneca., (© 2023 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the FOLL12 trial to determine the impact of different initial immunochemotherapy (ICT) regimens on patient outcomes. Patients were selected from the FOLL12 trial, which included adults with stage II-IV follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 1-3a and high tumor burden. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard ICT followed by rituximab maintenance (RM) or the same ICT followed by a response-adapted approach. ICT consisted of rituximab-bendamustine (RB) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP), per physician's decision. A total of 786 patients were included in this analysis, 341 of whom received RB and 445 R-CHOP. RB was more frequently prescribed to older subjects, females, patients without bulky disease, and those with grade 1-2 FL. After a median of 56 months of follow-up, R-CHOP and RB had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (Hazard Ratio for RB 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.42, p = 0.392). Standard RM was associated with improved PFS compared to response-adapted management both after R-CHOP and RB. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events were more frequent with R-CHOP during induction treatment and more frequent with RB during RM. Grade 3-4 infections were more frequent with RB. RB was also associated with a higher incidence of transformed FL. R-CHOP and RB showed similar activity and efficacy, but with different safety profiles and long-term events, suggesting that the treating physician should carefully select the most appropriate chemotherapy regimen for each patient based on patient's individual characteristics, choices, and risk profile., (© 2023 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The study by Kambhampati et al. offers the first European perspective on cost-effectiveness of pola-R-CHP in the frontline line treatment of DLBCL patients. Nevertheless, the applicability of these results in other European settings remain questionable: Germany is indeed a wealthy country with wide access to cellular therapies in earlier lines, while this might not be the case for other European countries. The presented data must be re-assessed when long term data on PFS and OS from the POLARIX trial are available, ideally considering also real-life data. Similar CEAs in other European health care systems as well as in specific subgroups of patients are welcome to offer a broader perspective on the potential role of pola-R-CHP in Europe. Commentary on: Kambhampati et al. Cost effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with chemoimmunotherapy (pola-R-CHP) in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Germany. Br J Haematol 2023;202:771-775., (© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Strongyloides and cytomegalovirus co-infections are rarely reported, even though they are distinguished by high morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised hosts. We narratively reviewed the literature on reported cases of Strongyloides and CMV co-infections in immunosuppressed patients. Most cases occurred in males with a median age of 47 (IQR, 37-59). Strongyloides /CMV co-infections occurred among immunocompromised hosts, especially in solid organ transplants and hematological or rheumatological diseases. Most of the patients underwent a course of steroid treatment before the diagnosis of co-infections. Other common immunomodulatory agents were tacrolimus and mycophenolate. The first clinical manifestations of co-infections were mainly gastrointestinal, followed by respiratory symptoms. CMV was, in most patients, co-infected with an isolated reactivation, although Strongyloides manifested especially as hyperinfection syndrome. Ganciclovir and ivermectin are the mainstays of CMV and Strongyloides treatment. However, the treatment mortality reported in this narrative review is around 52.4%. Interestingly secondary bacterial infections are common in CMV/ Strongyloides -infected patients.

Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the current standard therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and is curative in ∼60% of patients. Atezolizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that targets programmed death-ligand 1 and has previously shown antitumor activity in several tumor types. In a phase 1b/2 trial (NCT02596971), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in combination with R-CHOP (atezo-R-CHOP; for 6-8 cycles) in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Patients achieving a complete response (CR) at the end of induction received consolidation therapy with atezolizumab on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for an additional 17 cycles. Overall, 42 patients with DLBCL were included in this analysis. The primary endpoint, CR rate at the end of induction, as assessed by an independent review committee (modified Lugano 2014 criteria), was 77.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.0-87.7; n = 40). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were 77.4% (95% CI, 59.7-88.0) and 87.2% (95% CI, 71.9-94.5), respectively. All treated patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE; 32 patients [76.2%] had grade 3-4 AE). One patient had a fatal AE (unconfirmed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy) that was considered related to atezolizumab and rituximab, and 17 patients (40.5%) experienced atezolizumab-related AEs of special interest. In previously untreated patients with DLBCL, atezo-R-CHOP demonstrated encouraging clinical efficacy and a safety profile consistent with the known toxicities of the individual drugs. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02596971., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has variable outcomes. Current prognostic tools use factors for risk stratification that inadequately identify patients at high risk of refractory disease or relapse before initial treatment. A model associating 2 risk factors, total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) >220 cm3 (determined by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography) and performance status (PS) ≥2, identified as prognostic in 301 older patients in the REMARC trial (#NCT01122472), was validated in 2174 patients of all ages treated in 2 clinical trials, PETAL (Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas; N = 510) and GOYA (N = 1315), and in real-world clinics (N = 349) across Europe and the United States. Three risk categories, low (no factors), intermediate (1 risk factor), and high (2 risk factors), significantly discriminated outcome in most of the series. Patients with 2 risk factors had worse outcomes than patients with no risk factors in the PETAL, GOYA, and real-world series. Patients with intermediate risk also had significantly worse outcomes than patients with no risk factors. The TMTV/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-PS combination outperformed the International Prognostic Index with a positive C-index for progression-free survival and overall survival in most series. The combination of high TMTV > 220 cm3 and ECOG-PS ≥ 2 is a simple clinical model to identify aggressive LBCL risk categories before treatment. This combination addresses the unmet need to better predict before treatment initiation for aggressive LBCL the patients likely to benefit the most or not at all from therapy., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The role of macrophages (Mo) and their prognostic impact in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) remain controversial. By regulating the lipid metabolism, Liver-X-Receptors (LXRs) control Mo polarization/inflammatory response, and their pharmacological modulation is under clinical investigation to treat human cancers, including lymphomas. Herein, we surveyed the role of LXRs in DLBCL for prognostic purposes. Comparing bulk tumors with purified malignant and normal B-cells, we found an intriguing association of NR1H3, encoding for the LXR-α isoform, with the tumor microenvironment (TME). CIBERSORTx-based purification on large DLBCL datasets revealed a high expression of the receptor transcript in M1-like pro-inflammatory Mo. By determining an expression cut-off of NR1H3, we used digital measurement to validate its prognostic capacity on two large independent on-trial and real-world cohorts. Independently of classical prognosticators, NR1H3 high patients displayed longer survival compared with NR1H3 low cases and a high-resolution Mo GEP dissection suggested a remarkable transcriptional divergence between subgroups. Overall, our findings indicate NR1H3 as a Mo-related biomarker identifying patients at higher risk and prompt future preclinical studies investigating its mouldability for therapeutic purposes., (© 2022 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

This study's focus is the association of end-of-therapy (EOT) PET results with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. We develop a Bayesian hierarchical model for predicting PFS and OS from EOT PET-complete response (PET-CR) using a literature-based meta-analysis of 20 treatment arms and a substudy of 4 treatment arms in 3 clinical trials for which we have patient-level data. The PET-CR rate in our substudy was 72%. The modeled estimates for hazard ratio (PET-CR/non-PET-CR) were 0.13 for PFS (95% CI 0.10, 0.16) and 0.10 for OS (CI 0.07, 0.12). Hazard ratios varied little by patient subtype and were confirmed by the overall meta-analysis. We link these findings to designing future clinical trials and show how our model can be used in adapting the sample size of a trial to accumulating results regarding treatment benefits on PET-CR and a survival endpoint.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is nowadays a curable disease with the frontline treatment R-CHOP, but 30-40% of patients are still unresponsive or relapse thereafter. In the recent era several upcoming new options are improving the therapeutic landscape for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL setting, first of all anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) that already represent a standard of care as third-line therapy and are rapidly moving as second-line treatment for those who are refractory or early relapse after R-CHOP. Among these new therapies, the combinations polatuzumab plus rituximab and bendamustine, tafasitamab plus lenalidomide for transplant ineligible patients, and CD3xCD20 bispecific antibodies are the most relevant, but several other agents and strategies are on the way. On the other hand, in the last 20 years, several efforts have been spent in the attempt to ameliorate the outcome over R-CHOP for the frontline treatment of DLBCL shortening the interval between the cycles or intensifying treatment or adding novel drugs to R-CHOP without success, so far. Recent studies combining the anti-CD79b antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP and the anti-BCL2 agent venetoclax plus R-CHOP showed promising results. Preliminary data of new upcoming strategies characterized by a tailored therapy based on different molecular subtypes of DLBCL are encouraging, showing a benefit over the standard R-CHOP. In this manuscript, the literature data on the landscape of new therapies available and upcoming for both frontline and R/R settings of DLBCL will be critically reviewed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Obinutuzumab (G) chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) in the GALLIUM trial. Atezolizumab (atezo) is a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor with a complementary mechanism of action to G by restoring cytotoxic T-cell function. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezo-G-bendamustine in patients with previously untreated FL in a phase Ib/II trial (#NCT02596971). A safety run-in phase was followed by an expansion phase with atezo-G-bendamustine induction and atezo-G maintenance for ≤24 months. Forty patients with previously untreated FL were enrolled and treated with atezo-G-bendamustine. The primary endpoint, complete response (CR) rate, assessed by an independent review committee (IRC; modified Lugano 2014 criteria) was 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.3% to 85.8%). Three-year investigator-assessed PFS and overall survival rates were 80.9% (95% CI, 63.9% to 90.5%) and 89.3% (95% CI, 73.9% to 95.9%), respectively. At baseline, 21/40 patients had circulating lymphoma-specific clonotypes and underwent repeat testing at end of induction; all were minimal residual disease negative (10-5 sensitivity), with 16 (76.2%) CRs, 3 (14.3%) partial responses, and 2 (9.5%) with stable disease (IRC assessed). Grade 5 (fatal) adverse events (AEs) were reported in 5 patients. The efficacy of atezo-G-bendamustine in previously untreated FL did not appear superior to G-bendamustine efficacy as seen in the GALLIUM trial, and the addition of atezo to G-bendamustine was associated with an increased risk of AEs. Particularly due to the unfavorable safety profile, this regimen cannot be recommended in patients with previously untreated FL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02596971., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) is a rare and aggressive variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that usually affects young to middle-aged patients, with disseminated disease at presentation. The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a key role in THRLBCL due to its peculiar cellular composition (<10% neoplastic B cells interspersed in a cytotoxic T-cell/histiocyte-rich background). A significant percentage of THRLBCL is refractory to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP)-based regimens and to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; thus, the development of a specific therapeutic approach for these patients represents an unmet clinical need. To better understand the interaction of immune cells in THRLBCL TME and identify more promising therapeutic strategies, we compared the immune gene expression profiles of 12 THRLBCL and 10 DLBCL samples, and further corroborated our findings in an extended in silico set. Gene coexpression network analysis identified the predominant role of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis in the modulation of the immune response. Furthermore, the PD-1/PD-L1 activation was flanked by the overexpression of 48 genes related to the functional exhaustion of T cells. Globally, THRLBCL TME was highly interferon-inflamed and severely exhausted. The immune gene profiling findings strongly suggest that THRLBCL may be responsive to anti-PD-1 therapy but also allowed us to take a step forward in understanding THRLBCL TME. Of therapeutic relevance, we validated our results by immunohistochemistry, identifying a subset of TCF1+ (T cell-specific transcription factor 1, encoded by the TCF7 gene) progenitor exhausted T cells enriched in patients with THRLBCL. This subset of TCF1+ exhausted T cells correlates with good clinical response to immune checkpoint therapy and may improve prediction of anti-PD-1 response in patients with THRLBCL., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)