Search

Introduction: Data on real-world clinical practice and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with congenital heart disease (CHD) are scarce. The OPUS/OrPHeUS studies enrolled patients with PAH newly initiating macitentan, including those with PAH associated with CHD (CHD-PAH)., Methods: OPUS was a prospective, United States, multicenter, long-term, observational drug registry (April 2014-June 2020). OrPHeUS was a retrospective, United States, multicenter medical chart review (October 2013-March 2017). The characteristics, treatment patterns, safety, and outcomes during macitentan treatment of patients with CHD-PAH and the subgroups Eisenmenger syndrome, left-to-right shunts and small/coincidental CHD were descriptively compared., Results: The combined OPUS/OrPHeUS population included 272 (6.1%) patients with CHD-PAH (80 patients with Eisenmenger syndrome; 82 patients with left-to-right shunts and 92 patients with small/coincidental defects). Most patients across the CHD-PAH subgroups were in World Health Organization Functional Class II/III (82.9-94.6%). Macitentan was initiated as combination therapy in 65.0% of patients with CHD-PAH. During follow-up, 81.4% of patients experienced ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), the most common being dyspnea (23.5%), nausea (13.7%), dizziness (12.7%), headache (12.7%) and edema (10.8%). The 1- and 2-year Kaplan-Meier (95% confidence limits) estimates of patients with CHD-PAH being free from hospitalization were 64.5% (57.9, 70.4) and 49.3% (41.9, 56.3); for survival, the 1- and 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates were 93.5% (89.3, 96.1) and 90.2% (84.9, 93.7)., Conclusions: Macitentan was used in clinical practice in patients with CHD-PAH and its subgroups, including as combination therapy in the majority of patients. Safety in this population was consistent with the known profile of macitentan., Trial Registration: OPsumit ® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; Opsumit ® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688; URL www., Clinicaltrials: gov ., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Kelly M Chin has served as a Scientific Committee member for Johnson & Johnson; has received research grants/support from Johnson & Johnson, Altavant, Acceleron, United Therapeutics, Pfizer, Merck, Gossamer Bio; has received support for travel to meetings from Johnson & Johnson; and has received consultancy fees from Johnson & Johnson, Altavant, Acceleron, United Therapeutics and Gossamer Bio. Richard Channick served as a Scientific Committee member for Johnson & Johnson; served on an advisory board for Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; received research grants/support from Johnson & Johnson and United therapeutics; received speaker fees from Johnson & Johnson, and Bayer; received consultancy fees from Johnson & Johnson, Bayer and Third pole. Nick H Kim served as a Scientific Committee member for Johnson & Johnson; received research grants/support from Enzyvant and Lung Biotechnology; received consultant fees from Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, Merck, United Therapeutics, Gossamer Bio, Pulnovo and Polarean; and received speaker fees from Johnson & Johnson, Bayer and Merck. Rose Ong is an employee of Johnson & Johnson; has received support for travel to meetings from Johnson & Johnson; holds stock or stock options with Johnson & Johnson; and spouse is an employee of Roche. Stefano Turricchia, Nicolas Martin and Lada Mitchell are employees of Johnson & Johnson. Vallerie V McLaughlin served as a Scientific Committee member from Johnson & Johnson; received research grants from Aerovate, Altavant, Gossamer Bio, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and SoniVie; and received consultant fees from Aerami, Aerovate, Altavant, Bayer, Caremark, Corvista, Gossamer Bio, Johnson & Johnson, L.L.C, Merck and United Therapeutics. Ethical Approval: OPUS and OrPHeUS were executed in accordance with Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practices [29] and the 2008 Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles. Ethical approval was obtained from independent ethics committees/institutional review boards (IRB) of participating centers (see Supplementary Methods 1 for a full site list including local ethical review boards) and overseen by an Independent Scientific Committee (Supplementary Methods 2) with protocols reviewed by the US FDA. IRB approvals were provided by the Western IRB and Quorum (now Advarra) (OPUS registry; Western IRB approval number 2014‐0816, Quorum Review File number 29120/Advarra Pro00035124) and WCG‐IRB (OrPHeUS study; IRB numbers 2017‐8051 and 2017‐2348). In OPUS, written informed consent was obtained from all patients, including for publication of anonymized patient data (in OrPHeUS, an IRB waiver for informed consent was obtained). The informed consent form in OPUS included a confidentiality clause that all records and documents pertaining to the participation of patients in the OPUS registry would be held strictly confidential and their names would not be reported in any publications resulting from the OPUS registry. Following the approval of macitentan by the US FDA for the long-term treatment of PAH, OPUS and OrPHeUS were initiated as a post-marketing requirement to evaluate the potential risks for liver toxicity with macitentan use. This post-marketing requirement was completed in September 2019., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Data on real-world clinical practice and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH) are scarce. The OPUS/OrPHeUS studies enrolled patients newly initiating macitentan, including those with CTD-PAH. This analysis describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety profiles of patients with CTD-PAH newly initiating macitentan in the US using the OPUS/OrPHeUS combined dataset., Methods: OPUS was a prospective, US, multicenter, long-term, observational drug registry (April 2014-June 2020). OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter medical chart review (October 2013-March 2017). The characteristics, treatment patterns, safety, and outcomes during macitentan treatment of patients with CTD-PAH and its subgroups systemic sclerosis (SSc-PAH), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE-PAH), and mixed CTD (MCTD-PAH) were descriptively compared to patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH (I/HPAH)., Results: The combined OPUS/OrPHeUS population included 2498 patients with I/HPAH and 1192 patients with CTD-PAH (708 SSc-PAH; 159 SLE-PAH; 124 MCTD-PAH, and 201 other CTD-PAH etiologies). At macitentan initiation for patients with I/HPAH and CTD-PAH, respectively: 61.2 and 69.3% were in World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC) III/IV; median 6-min walk distance was 289 and 279 m; and 58.1 and 65.2% received macitentan as combination therapy. During follow-up, for patients with I/HPAH and CTD-PAH, respectively: median duration of macitentan exposure observed was 14.0 and 15.8 months; 79.0 and 83.0% experienced an adverse event; Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence limits [CL]) of patients free from all-cause hospitalization at 1 year were 60.3% (58.1, 62.4) and 59.3% (56.1, 62.3); and Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% CL) of survival at 1 year were 90.5% (89.1, 91.7) and 90.6% (88.6, 92.3)., Conclusions: Macitentan was used in clinical practice in patients with CTD-PAH and its subgroups, including as combination therapy. The safety and tolerability profile of macitentan in patients with CTD-PAH was comparable to that of patients with I/HPAH., Trial Registration: OPsumit® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; Opsumit® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688; www., Clinicaltrials: gov Graphical abstract available for this article., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Evaluating overall survival in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can often be confounded by bias introduced by treatment switching. SERAPHIN was a large RCT that evaluated the effects of long-term treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. In an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a non-significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality up to study closure was reported with macitentan 10 mg versus placebo. As patients could switch treatment when experiencing symptoms of disease progression, this analysis attempts to adjust for the confounding effects on overall survival., Methods: The inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) and rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) models were used to estimate the treatment effect on overall mortality had there been no treatment switching in SERAPHIN. Time to all-cause death was evaluated up to study closure. Treatment switching was defined as patients in the placebo group switching to open-label macitentan 10 mg, and patients in the macitentan 10 mg group prematurely discontinuing macitentan., Results: By study closure, 73.2% (183/250) of patients in the placebo group had switched to macitentan 10 mg. Among these patients, exposure time to macitentan 10 mg represented 28.2% of total study treatment exposure (cumulative exposure 134.6 patient-years). At study closure, 24.8% (60/242) of patients in the macitentan 10 mg group were not receiving open-label macitentan; mean time not receiving macitentan was 44.3 weeks. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival using the IPCW and RPSFT methods were lower (HR 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22, 0.81; p = 0.009, and HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04, 2.83, respectively) than the ITT unadjusted HR (0.80, 95% CI 0.51, 1.24)., Conclusion: These results from the current analyses indicate that in SERAPHIN, the standard ITT analysis was confounded by treatment switching resulting in an underestimation of the benefit of macitentan 10 mg on overall survival. By adjusting for switching, the IPCW and RPSFT models estimated a 58% and 67% reduction in risk of mortality, respectively, with macitentan 10 mg versus placebo., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00660179., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: High endothelin-1 (ET-1) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) levels may induce in healthy endothelial cells (EC) an endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT). The same cytokines are associated with fibrosis development in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although EndMT has not been definitively shown in SSc, this process, potentially induced by a stimulatory loop involving these 2 cytokines, overexpressed in this disease might contribute to fibroblast accumulation in affected tissues. Macitentan (MAC), an ET-1 receptor antagonist interfering with this loop, might prevent EndMT and fibroblast accumulation., Methods: EC, isolated from healthy controls (HC) and patients with SSc, were treated with ET-1 and TGF-β and successively analyzed for gene and protein expressions of endothelial and mesenchymal markers, and for Sma- and Mad-related (SMAD) phosphorylation. Further, in the supernatants, we evaluated ET-1 and TGF-β production by ELISA assay. In each assay we evaluated the ability of MAC to inhibit both the TGF-β and ET-1 effects., Results: We showed that both TGF-β and ET-1 treatments induced an activation of the EndMT process in SSc-EC as reported in HC cells. The ELISA assays showed a mutual TGF-β and ET-1 induction in both SSc-EC and HC-EC. A statistically significant increase of SMAD phosphorylation after treatment was observed in SSc-EC. In each assay, MAC inhibited both TGF-β and ET-1 effects., Conclusion: Our work is the first demonstration in literature that SSc-EC, under the synergistic effect of TGF-β and ET-1, may transdifferentiate toward myofibroblasts, thus contributing to fibroblast accumulation. MAC, interfering with this process in vitro, may offer a new potential therapeutic strategy against fibrosis.