1. Patient Assignment and Quality Performance: A Misaligned System.
- Author
-
Love, Kailey, Turner, Stefanie, Runger, George, Adams, Cameron, and Riley, William
- Subjects
- *
CLINICAL medicine , *CROSS-sectional method , *PROSPECTIVE payment systems , *KEY performance indicators (Management) , *PRIMARY health care , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *EVALUATION of medical care , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *ELIGIBILITY (Social aspects) , *PHYSICIAN-patient relations , *MEDICAL records , *ACQUISITION of data , *QUALITY assurance , *MEDICAID , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *INTEGRATED health care delivery , *INSURANCE companies - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the congruence between patient assignment and established patients as well as their association with Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality performance. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis from January 2020 to February 2022. METHODS: The study setting is a fully integrated health care delivery system in Phoenix, Arizona. The study population includes Medicaid patients who received primary care services or were assigned to a primary care physician (PCP) at the study setting by 5 Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs). We identified 4 possible relationships between the established patients (2 primary care visits) and the assigned patients (assigned by the MCO to the study setting): true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative classifications. Precision and recall measures were used to assess congruence (or incongruence). Outcome measures were HEDIS quality metrics. RESULTS: A total of 100,030 Medicaid enrollees (adults and children) were established and/or assigned to the study setting from 5 separate payers. Only 15% were congruently established and assigned to the physician (true-positive). The overall precision was 21%, and the overall recall was 37%. The HEDIS quality performance was significantly higher (P< .05) for established patients for 5 of 6 metrics compared with patients who were not established. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of assigned patients were not treated by the assigned PCP, yet better patient outcomes were seen with an established patient. As the health system rapidly adopts value-based payments, more rigorous methodologies are essential to identify physician-patient relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF