Hung LJ, Huang CY, Tung KC, Chen JS, Huang WK, Hsu CC, Fang YF, Wang CL, Liu PC, Yeh KY, Chang PH, Chang JW, Lin YC, Huang SF, and Chou WC
Background: This retrospective study analyzed tumor tissue profiling data to assess the potential of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for patient care across diverse solid tumors., Material and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent stage IIIB or IV lung adenocarcinoma with a null immunophenotype and esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, or bile duct cancer between January 2020 and July 2023 at two medical centers in Taiwan were included. One cohort was a part of the National Biobank Consortium of Taiwan project, whereas the other consisted of patients undergoing routine clinical practice. Tumor samples were subjected to CGP using FoundationOne®CDx, with therapeutic implications determined using OncoKB classification., Results: FoundationOne®CDx testing of 574 patients was successful in 456 (79.4%) patients. Clinically actionable genomic alterations were detected in 21.1% (96/456) of the patients, including 17.5%, 2.9%, and 0.7% of patients with evidence levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Lung adenocarcinoma accounted for the largest proportion of samples with at least one actionable gene alteration (63.2%), followed by bile duct (26.9%), gastric (17.6%), esophageal (4.0%), and pancreatic (3.1%) cancers. Based on CGP results, 43 patients (9.4%) received matched targeted therapy. The median overall survival of patients who received matched therapy or not was 26.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 16.7-35.5 months) and 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.28, 95% CI, 0.14-0.55, p < 0.001), respectively., Conclusions: This study provides comprehensive insights into the genomic profiles of diverse cancers in Taiwan, highlighting the crucial role of CGP in identifying actionable genomic alterations and guiding effective therapeutic strategies in real-world practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest A conflict of interest occurs when an individual's objectivity is potentially compromised by a desire for financial gain, prominence, professional advancement or a successful outcome. JFMA Editors strive to ensure that what is published in the Journal is as balanced, objective and evidence-based as possible. Since it can be difficult to distinguish between an actual conflict of interest and a perceived conflict of interest, the Journal requires authors to disclose all and any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)