Search

Background: The transition from surgical residency to independent practice is a challenging period that has not been well studied. Methods: An email invitation to complete a 55-item survey and the Maslach Burnout Inventory–Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) was sent to early career general surgeons across Canada. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare demographic and survey characteristics with burnout. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. Results: Of the 586 surgeons contacted, 88 responded (15%); 51/88 surgeons (58.0%) were classified as burnt out according to the MBI-HSS. Most surgeons (68.2%) were not confident in their abilities to handle the business aspect of practice. The majority (60.2%) believed that a transition to independent practice program would be beneficial to recent surgical graduates. Conclusions: Our data showed high prevalence of burnout among recently graduated general surgeons across Canada. Further, respondents were not confident in their managerial and administrative skills required to run a successful independent practice.

Rates of bilateral mastectomy are rising in women with unilateral, nonhereditary breast cancer. We aim to characterize how psychosocial outcomes evolve after breast cancer surgery. We performed a prospective cohort study of women with unilateral, sporadic stage 0–III breast cancer at University Health Network in Toronto, Canada between 2014 and 2017. Women completed validated psychosocial questionnaires (BREAST-Q, Impact of Event Scale, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale) preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Change in psychosocial scores was assessed between surgical groups using linear mixed models, controlling for age, stage, and adjuvant treatments. P < .05 were significant. A total of 475 women underwent unilateral lumpectomy (42.5%), unilateral mastectomy (38.3%), and bilateral mastectomy (19.2%). There was a significant interaction (P < .0001) between procedure and time for breast satisfaction, psychosocial and physical well-being. Women having unilateral lumpectomy had higher breast satisfaction and psychosocial well-being scores at 6 and 12 months after surgery compared with either unilateral or bilateral mastectomy, with no difference between the latter two groups. Physical well-being declined in all groups over time; scores were not better in women having bilateral mastectomy. While sexual well-being scores remained stable in the unilateral lumpectomy group, scores declined similarly in both unilateral and bilateral mastectomy groups over time. Cancer-related distress, anxiety, and depression scores declined significantly after surgery, regardless of surgical procedure (P < .001). Psychosocial outcomes are not improved with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer. Our data may inform women considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with breast cancer treated with curative intent. Methods: AYA breast cancer patients (defined as diagnosed between 18 to 39 years of age) treated at a large tertiary cancer centre between January 2014 and December 2016 were identified. Patients routinely complete the validated symptom screening tool, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) prior to their clinical encounter. Scores from diagnosis up to 24 months post-diagnosis were obtained from our internal database, with elevated scores defined as > 4 for each individual symptom (rated 0-10). Patient, clinical and treatment characteristics were extracted from medical records. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient, clinical and treatment characteristics, and ESAS-r scores. Time to recurrence was calculated from diagnosis to local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis or death (whichever occurred first). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare time to recurrence between women with vs. without elevated symptom scores. Chi-squared test was used to test the change in number of patients with elevated symptom scores over time. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were carried out to assess association between various factors and ESAS-r symptoms of depression, anxiety and well-being within 24 months of diagnosis. Results: Among 258 patients identified, 211 (82%) had accompanying ESAS-r and were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 3.9 years. Median age at diagnosis was 35 (20-39), most were clinical stage 2/3 at diagnosis (63%), 20% had triple negative disease, 76% received chemotherapy and 81% received radiotherapy. Overall, symptom burden was the highest (scores > 4) for decreased well-being (52%), tiredness (48%) and anxiety (44%). Although symptom burden significantly improved over time, 43%, 38% and 33% of patients, respectively, reported elevated symptoms 24 months post-diagnosis. Multivariable analysis found that elevated anxiety was significantly associated with younger age at diagnosis (p=0.036), receipt of chemotherapy (p=0.01) and presence of long-term toxicity (p=0.0032). Elevated depression, anxiety and well-being were significantly associated with referral to Psychosocial Oncology (p=0.024, p=0.036 and p=0.019, respectively), whereas well-being was also associated with referral to Survivorship Clinic (p=0.043). However, overall rates of referral (24-36%) were much lower than symptom prevalence. There was no association between elevated symptoms and time to recurrence. Conclusion: AYAs diagnosed with breast cancer report high symptom burden that continues to persist up to 24-months post-diagnosis. Patients with elevated psychosocial distress are more likely to be referred to Psychosocial Oncology and Survivorship clinics, indicating that the ESAS-r is a useful screening tool in a real-world setting. However, a gap between symptom burden and intervention exists, providing opportunities for future research. Citation Format: Revathy Krishnamurthy, Tulin Cil, Philippe Bedard, Robin Forbes, Madeline Li, Zhihui (Amy) Liu, Jennifer Croke. Patient-reported outcomes of adolescents and young adults with breast cancer treated with curative intent [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD12-09.

BACKGROUND: Changes in access to breast imaging and suspension of mammographic screening during the COVID-19 pandemic had the potential to significantly delay breast cancer diagnostic pathways. The Gattuso Rapid Diagnostic Centre (GRDC) is an innovative clinic that provides a patient-centered approach for investigation of suspicious breast abnormalities and sees approximately 1200 patients per year. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on patient volumes and imaging at this high-volume breast rapid diagnostic centre. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who presented to the GRDC from the start of the pandemic (March 12, 2020) until May 31, 2020 was performed. The number of patients, reason for referral, cancer detection rate (CDR), and waiting time from appointment to diagnosis were evaluated and compared to a corresponding time period in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 168 new patients presented to the GRDC during the study period, corresponding to a 32.3% decrease in the number of patients compared to 2019 (n=248). Seventy-eight patients (46.4%) were referred due to the presence of a clinical palpable abnormality, which represented an increase of 13.8% (n=81 [32.7%] in 2019; p=0.005). Out of 168 patients, 69 were diagnosed with a breast malignancy, yielding a CDR of 41.1% during the pandemic versus 111 patients in 2019 (CDR of 44.8%; p= 0.456). The average time from appointment at GRDC to diagnosis was lower at 0.76 days vs 1.21 days in 2019. The rate of same day diagnosis was significantly higher at 39.5% vs 27.0% in 2019 (p=0.008). Twenty-five patients (14.9%) received neoadjuvant systemic therapy compared to 16 patients (6.5%) in 2019 (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: There were fewer patients presenting for breast investigations during the pandemic period and a significant increase in the percentage of patients with palpable masses as the cause for referral with no appreciable change in the CDR. The presence of a rapid diagnostic breast center enabled patients with concerning breast symptoms to access and receive expedited assessment. This ensured patients did not undergo diagnostic delays despite the health care restrictions that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Citation Format: Gary Ko, Sharmy Sarvanantham, Sangita Sequeira, Vrutika Prajapati, David R. McCready, Vivianne Freitas, Tulin D. Cil. Benefits of a rapid diagnostic centre for breast cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-27.

Background Full-thickness chest wall resection (FTCWR) is an underused modality for treating locally advanced primary or recurrent breast cancer invading the chest wall, for which little data exist regarding morbidity and mortality. We examined the postoperative complication rates in breast cancer patients undergoing FTCWR using a large multinational surgical outcomes database. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. All patients undergoing FTCWR for breast cancer between 2007 and 2016 were identified (n = 137). Primary outcome measures included 30-d postoperative morbidity, composite respiratory complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS). The secondary aim was to compare the postoperative morbidity of FTCWR to those of patients undergoing mastectomy. One-to-one coarsened exact matching was conducted between two groups, which were then compared with respect to morbidity, mortality, reoperations, readmissions, and LOS. Results The overall rate of postoperative morbidity was 11.7%. Two patients (1.5%) had respiratory complications requiring intubation. Median hospital LOS was 2 d. In the coarsened exact matching analysis, 122 patients were included in each of the two groups. Comparison of matched cohorts demonstrated an overall morbidity for the FTCWR group of 11.5% compared with 8.2% for the mastectomy group (8.2%) (P = 0.52). Conclusions FTCWR for the local treatment of breast cancer can be performed with relatively low morbidity and respiratory complications. This is the largest study looking at postoperative complications for FTCWR in the treatment of breast cancer. Future studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes of FTCWR in this patient population.

Background Gender bias is thought to exist in the assessment of clinical teachers, yet its extent in different specialties is not well-documented nor has it been studied at the individual-dyadic level. Objective The authors sought to determine whether gender bias exists in residents' assessments of faculty teaching in 3 clinical departments, and if present, whether this is influenced by gender concordance or discordance between the faculty and resident. Methods Residents' ratings of faculty in internal medicine (800 faculty, 5753 ratings), surgery (377, 2249), and family medicine (672, 3438) at the University of Toronto from 2016–2017 were analyzed using the overall global rating on a 5-point scale. A mixed-effects linear regression analysis accounted for nesting of ratings within each faculty member. Results Overall scores of teaching effectiveness showed a strong skew to favorable ratings for all faculty and a ceiling effect. However, gender effects differed across departments. In internal medicine (38.5% female faculty), no significant gender effects were detected. In surgery (16.2% female) and family medicine (53.0% female), male faculty received significantly higher scores than female faculty. In surgery this was driven by male residents giving male faculty higher ratings (4.46 vs 4.26, P < .001). In family medicine this was driven by male faculty receiving higher ratings regardless of resident gender (4.65 to 4.57, P < .001). Conclusions Although effects were very small and inconsistent, with gender concordance mattering only for one department, it suggests that gender is a meaningful source of variance in teaching assessments.

BACKGROUND Despite the recent surge in rates of immediate breast reconstruction, there is a paucity of large multicenter studies to compare differences in morbidity after immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. This study used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to study the association between timing of breast reconstruction and complication rates, stratified by reconstructive modality. STUDY DESIGN The NSQIP database was used to identify breast reconstructions from 2005 to 2012. Rates of major complications were compared by timing within each reconstructive modality (implant vs autologous). Cohort differences in baseline characteristics and variables associated with increased complication rates were identified in bivariate analyses. A multivariable model was created to compare the association between the timing of reconstruction and major complications. RESULTS Of 24,506 postmastectomy reconstructions, 85.8% were immediate, 14.2% were delayed, 84% were implant, and 16% were autologous reconstructions. Overall, 10.0% of patients suffered a major complication. After stratification, only implant reconstructions showed a statistically higher complication rate with immediate (8.8%) reconstruction compared with delayed (5.3%) (odds ratio, 1.7, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in complication rates between autologous immediate (18.4%) or delayed (19.0%) reconstructions. After controlling for baseline cohort differences and other risk factors, immediate reconstruction remained as an independent significant predictor of major complications in implant reconstructions (odds ratio, 1.8, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction is associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications in implant reconstruction but not in autologous reconstruction. It is important to include these findings in the routine preoperative surgeon-patient discussion of reconstructive options.

Many women with early-onset breast cancer experience adverse psychological sequelae which impact on their quality of life. We sought to correlate levels of anxiety and cancer-related distress in women with breast cancer shortly after surgery and one year after treatment with the estimated risk of death. We studied 596 women with Stage I to III breast cancer. For each woman we estimated the five-year risk of death based on SEER data from 2010 to 2019. For each woman we measured anxiety and cancer-related distress levels shortly after surgery and one year later. The mean estimated five-year survival was 95%. At one week post-surgery, 59% of women had a clinically significant level of anxiety and 74% had a clinically significant level of cancer-related distress. There was no correlation between the objective risk of death and the level of anxiety or distress, at one week or at one year. Many women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancers experience significant levels of anxiety and distress. The emotional response to a breast cancer diagnosis is not related to the risk of death per se and other factors should be explored.

The Ontario High Risk Breast Screening program follows women aged 30–69 at an increased risk of breast cancer, using a yearly mammography and breast MRI. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes for the enrolled women. Observational cohort study following 2081 participants in the high-risk screening program 2011–2017. The participants were divided into three subgroup according to their risk criteria: (a) known carriers of pathogenic variants (PV) in hereditary breast cancer genes. (b) Previous chest radiotherapy. (c) Estimated life time risk (ELR) ≥ 25%, calculated using the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) tool, with no known mutation or previous radiation. All Breast Cancer (BC) diagnosed during the follow-up time were recorded. 673 women carried PVs in hereditary breast cancer genes, 159 had a history of chest radiotherapy, and 1249 had an ELR ≥ 25%. The total cohort of screening years was 8126. Median age at BC diagnosis was 41 for the first group, 47 for the second group and 51 for the third. BC incidence rate was 18.2 for PV mutation carriers, 17.9 for the chest radiotherapy group and 6.2 for ELR ≥ 25%. Hazard ratio was similar for the first two groups, but significantly lower for the ELR ≥ 25% group. When stratifying by age, the incidence rate in the ELR ≥ 25% increased over time, until it became similar to that of the other subgroups after age 50. Our findings question the need to screen women with an elevated lifetime risk using the same screening practices used for women who are PV mutation carriers, or with a history of chest radiation, prior to the age of 50.

Women continue to be underrepresented in academic anesthesiology, especially in leadership positions. Possible reasons for this gender disparity include family responsibilities, inadequate mentorship, lack of desire for leadership, the leaky pipeline effect (i.e., attrition of women physicians over the course of their career trajectories), and discrimination. Our objective was to understand the lived experiences of Canadian anesthesiologists in leadership positions. In this constructivist grounded theory-inspired study, we used purposeful sampling to identify women anesthesiologists in leadership positions at one Canadian institution. Each participant underwent a one-on-one semi-structured interview of 40-60 min in length, sampling until theoretical saturation was reached. We included questions about the participant’s practice setting, influences on their career, and advice the participant would provide to other women in leadership. We used an iterative approach to theoretical sampling and data analysis. The audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were transcribed and coded. NVivo12 was used for open and axial coding, and cross-referencing. Eight women anesthesiologists were recruited and interviewed. Our iterative process identified four interconnected themes: difficulty internalizing a leadership identity, identifying systemic barriers and biases, dissonance between agentic traits and communal social gender roles, and mentorship as shaping lived experiences. Participants consistently expressed experiencing discrimination, articulated barriers related to family responsibilities and ingrained societal expectations, and discussed how typical leadership traits are applied differently to women and men. Women perceived themselves as more compassionate and communicative than men. Despite these traits, these women have expressed barriers to obtaining mentorship. We identified consistent interconnected themes among the experiences of our sample of women anesthesiologists in academic leadership and found that academic anesthesiology is a gendered profession as experienced by these women leaders. Further research should focus on strategies to remove barriers to participation in academic anesthesiology for women.

Many women are being offered rapid genetic testing (RGT) for cancer predisposition genes, at the time of breast cancer diagnosis prior to surgery. The goal of this study was to determine if psychosocial functioning was affected in women receiving RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis.Participants were women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, at four centres in Toronto, Canada. Eligible women were referred into the study by their surgeon at the time of diagnosis. Participants received pre-test genetic counselling and were offered RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Standardized questionnaires (Impact of Event Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were completed before genetic counselling, and follow-up questionnaires at one-week and one-year post-genetic test result disclosure (higher scores indicate higher symptoms).1007 women had RGT; 60 women (6.0%) were found to have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, 80 women (7.9%) had a VUS, and 867 (86.1%) had a negative test result. At one-week post-testing, there were no differences in distress (p = 0.32), anxiety (p = 0.14), or depression (p = 0.42) between women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and those with a negative result. At one year, there were no differences in distress (p = 0.75) or anxiety (p = 0.13) between women with a BRCA1 or BRCA/2 mutation and those with a negative result. However, women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had significantly lower depression scores compared to women with a negative result (p = 0.03).For women who have RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, identifying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation does not impair psychosocial functioning in the short or long term.

PURPOSETo provide recommendations on the best strategies for the management and on the best timing and treatment (surgical and radiotherapeutic) of the axilla for patients with early-stage breast cancer.METHODSOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) and ASCO convened a Working Group and Expert Panel to develop evidence-based recommendations informed by a systematic review of the literature.RESULTSThis guideline endorsed two recommendations of the ASCO 2017 guideline for the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage breast cancer and expanded on that guideline with recommendations for radiotherapy interventions, timing of staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and mapping modalities. Overall, the ASCO 2017 guideline, seven high-quality systematic reviews, 54 unique studies, and 65 corollary trials formed the evidentiary basis of this guideline.RECOMMENDATIONSRecommendations are issued for each of the objectives of this guideline: (1) To determine which patients with early-stage breast cancer require axillary staging, (2) to determine whether any further axillary treatment is indicated for women with early-stage breast cancer who did not receive NAC and are sentinel lymph node–negative at diagnosis, (3) to determine which axillary strategy is indicated for women with early-stage breast cancer who did not receive NAC and are pathologically sentinel lymph node–positive at diagnosis (after a clinically node-negative presentation), (4) to determine what axillary treatment is indicated and what the best timing of axillary treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer is when NAC is used, and (5) to determine which are the best methods for identifying sentinel nodes. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

Background Presentation to multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) supports optimal treatment of young women with breast cancer (YWBC). However, research shows barriers to MCC practice, and variation in professional attendance and referral patterns. A checklist may help overcome these barriers and support MCC practice with YWBC. Methods We developed, piloted and evaluated an MCC checklist in sites participating in a pan-Canadian study (RUBY; Reducing the bUrden of Breast cancer in Young women). A survey assessed checklist processes and impacts, and checklist data were analysed for checklist uptake, MCC presentation rates and MCC processes including staff attendance. Results Fifteen RUBY sites used the checklist (~50%), mostly for data collection/tracking. Some positive effects on clinical practice such as increased presentation of YWBC at MCC were reported, but most survey participants indicated that MCC processes were sufficient without the checklist. Conversely, checklist data show that only 31% of patients were presented at MCC. Of those, 41% were recommended treatment change. Conclusion Despite limited checklist uptake, there was evidence of its clinical practice benefit. Furthermore, it supported data collection/quality monitoring. Critically, checklist data showed gaps in MCC practice and low MCC presentation rates for YWBC. This contrasts with overall provider perceptions that MCCs are working well. Findings suggest that supports for MCC are needed but may best take the form of clear national practice recommendations and audit and feedback cycles to inform awareness of good MCC practice and outcomes. In this setting, tools like the MCC checklist may become helpful in supporting MCC practice.

The safety of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in older women is largely unknown. This study aimed to determine the 30-day postoperative complication rates following IBR (implant-based or autologous) in older women (≥ 70 years) with breast cancer and to compare them to younger women (18–69 years). The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify women with in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent IBR (2005–2016). Outcomes included 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, which were compared across age groups stratified by type of reconstruction. Of 28,850 women who underwent implant-based and 9123 who underwent autologous reconstruction, older women comprised 6.5% and 5.7% of the sample, respectively. Compared to younger women, older women had more comorbidities, shorter operative times, and longer length of hospital stay. In the implant-based reconstruction group, the 30-day morbidity rate was significantly higher in older women (7.5% vs 5.3%, p

Objective. Breast-conserving therapy with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is currently the standard of care for women with early breast cancer. Our aim was to determine if early-stage breast cancers treated with lumpectomy and primary intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) have comparable local recurrence rates. This is the first study examining the Canadian experience with IORT. Methods. Patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy with pre-pathology IORT between 2007- 2017 were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome measure was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBRT). A time to event analysis was performed; Kaplan-Meier estimates report the fraction of patients living free of recurrence. Secondary outcomes included acute and chronic wound complications. Results. 106 patients with a median age of 70 (IQR 65-75) were included. Median follow-up was 33 months. The majority of patients had screen-detected (94.3%), estrogen-receptor positive (96.2%), HER2neu negative (93.4%), invasive ductal carcinomas (92.5%). Only 50 (47.6%) were prescribed adjuvant endocrine blockade. IBTR occurred in 5 (4.7%) patients. Five and ten-year local recurrence-free rates were 0.95 and 0.81, respectively. The superficial skin infection rate was 9.4%. Acute symptomatic seromas occurred in 23 (21.7%), while only 10 (9.4%) persisted chronically. Conclusion. In this cohort of Canadian post-menopausal women treated with breast-conserving surgery and IORT, the IBTR approached 5%. Despite selection of low-risk patients, the local recurrence rate is higher than what is reported in the literature with EBRT. The low rates of prescribed adjuvant systemic therapy may have contributed to this outcome. Citation Format: Elmi M, Tigert A, Escallon J, Zagorski B, Leong W, Vranic M, Fyles A, Vitkin A, Cil T, McCready D. Intraoperative radiotherapy outcomes in early-stage breast cancer: A study in elderly Canadian women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-02.

Background:Less than 14% of older women undergo post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. A major reason for the low rate is the concern about post-operative complications. A thorough analysis of surgical complications by age group is limited in previous studies. The aim of this study is to determine the surgical complication rates of older women (≥70 years old) with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction and compare them to younger women (18–69 years old). Methods: Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database were used to identify women with carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer who underwent delayed or immediate breast reconstruction (2005-2016). The primary outcome was 30-day post-operative surgical complications; the secondary outcome was 30-day mortality.Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative complications and mortality rates were compared across age groups and each type of reconstruction. Results: Of 42,929 women who underwent breast reconstruction, 2,615 (6.1%) were older women. Although compared to young women, older women were more likely to have medical comorbidities their American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) classification was lower.Tumor histology distribution was similar in both groups. Lymph node surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly less frequent among older women. Compared to young women, older women more frequently underwent immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) [n=2,405 (92%) versus n=33,580 (88.3%), p Conclusions: Overall, 30-day postoperative complications in older women who undergo breast reconstruction are extremely low. Infection rates were slightly higher in the older group however; severe complications such as flap failure, bleeding, reoperation, and death were more common in young women. Age alone did not confer an increased risk of complications after breast reconstruction. Breast reconstruction can be safely offered to older women undergoing breast cancer treatment. Citation Format: Angarita FA, McCready DR, Cil T. Is breast reconstruction safe in women over 70? An analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-01.

Purpose: Although the field of medical education research is growing and residents are increasingly recruited to participate as subjects in research studies, little is known about their experiences. The goal of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of residents who are study participants in medical education research. Method: A phenomenographic approach was chosen to examine the range of residents’ experiences as research participants. A maximum variation sampling strategy was used to identify residents with diverse experiences. Semi-structured interviews that explored experiences as research participants were conducted with nineteen residents in internal medicine, general surgery, and pediatrics at the University of Toronto in 2015–2016. Results: The perceptions and experiences of participants fell into two categories. First, participation was seen as a professional responsibility to advance the profession, including a desire to improve future educational practices and a sense of responsibility to contribute to the academic cause. Second, the experience was noted for its personal impact, including benefits (e.g., receiving monetary incentives or novel educational experiences) and risks (e.g., coercion and breaches of confidentiality). The time required to participate in a study was identified as one of the most important factors affecting willingness to participate and the impact of participation. Conclusions: Being a participant in medical education research can be perceived in different ways. Understanding the view of resident participants is important to optimize potential benefits and minimize risks and negative consequences for them, thus fostering ready participation and high-quality research.

Racial disparities in breast cancer are well established. However, there is a paucity of literature assessing the interaction of patient, socioeconomic, and community factors on breast cancer care. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of race/ ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance status on disease presentation, access to care, and survival in breast cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients of Non-Hispanic White (NHW), Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in a large American national cancer registry. A total of 382,975 patients were identified. We demonstrated that NHB and Hispanic patients are more likely to present with more advanced stage disease, less likely to undergo surgery, and less likely to undergo breast reconstruction than their NHW counterparts. We also demonstrated worse survival for NHB patients compared to NHW patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that these disparities were compounded across worsening socioeconomic status and insurance coverage.

The assessment of a patient with breast cancer involves taking a focused history. This includes identification of both the modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for breast cancer that the patient carries. Most of the modifiable risk factors are related to estrogen. Non-modifiable risk factors include family history and precursor lesions. Physical examination of the breasts and lymph nodes must be performed. Both mammography and ultrasound are typically utilized to image the breasts, with higher diagnostic accuracy associated with concomitant use. Breast MRI is generally reserved for high-risk patients, with its use not otherwise shown to increase survival. Staging imaging to assess for metastatic disease is recommended for locally advanced and recurrent breast cancer and those with symptoms of metastatic disease. Lesions suspicious for cancer on imaging, as classified by the BI-RADS scoring system, should be biopsied. Core-needle biopsy is preferred over fine-needle aspiration because of its higher diagnostic accuracy. The results of the biopsy should be concordant with imaging and clinical findings or must be repeated. The AJCC Breast Cancer staging system can then be used to clinically stage and prognosticate the patient based on the results from the clinical exam, imaging, and biopsy.

There is an increasing desire for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) among patients with unilateral breast cancer. It is unknown if risk assessment and genetic testing at the time of diagnosis will aid women in their surgical choice. We report on the uptake and predictors of CPM in women receiving a negative genetic test result for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations before surgery.Women diagnosed with breast cancer between June 2013 and May 2018 were recruited from four academic health sciences centers in Toronto, Canada. Genetic counseling (risk assessment) and genetic testing was performed prior to surgery. Women were asked about their surgical preference before surgery. At 1 year post-surgery we asked what surgery was completed. This study reports on women who received a negative BRCA1/BRCA2 result.A total of 766 women with a mean age of 46 years (range 21-82) were included in the analysis. Before genetic counseling and testing, 37% of the women were undecided or leaning towards CPM; however, after receiving a negative BRCA test, 15% of the women opted for CPM. Thirty percent of women whose mother died of breast cancer elected for CPM, compared with 15% of women whose mother did not die of breast cancer (p = 0.03).Women receiving a risk assessment and negative BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test result before surgery use this information to guide their surgical decision. Uptake of CPM for women who were planning on CPM before genetic testing decreases after receiving a negative BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test result.

Deep serratus anterior plane block has been widely adopted as an analgesic adjunct for patients undergoing breast surgery, but robust supporting evidence of efficacy is lacking. We randomly allocated 40 patients undergoing simple or partial mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy to receive either a pre-operative deep serratus anterior plane block (serratus group) or a placebo injection (sham group), in addition to systemic analgesia. The primary outcome measure was the quality of recovery score at discharge, as assessed by the quality of recovery-15 questionnaire at various time-points. Secondary analgesic outcomes included: pain severity; postoperative opioid consumption; opioid-related side-effects; patient satisfaction up to 7 days postoperatively; and persistent postoperative pain up to 3 months after surgery. All patients who were recruited completed the study. There were no differences in the quality of recovery-15 scores between patients in the serratus and control groups, with mean (SD) scores of 96 (14) and 102 (20) for the control and serratus groups, respectively. We were also unable to detect differences in any of the secondary analgesic outcomes examined. The addition of a deep serratus anterior plane block to systemic analgesia does not enhance quality of recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory breast cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND Whether to undergo postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is a challenging, preference-sensitive decision. It is therefore paramount to optimize decision quality through ensuring patients' knowledge and aligning treatments with their personal preferences. This study assessed the effects of a preconsultation educational group intervention (PEGI) on patient knowledge, state-trait anxiety, and decisional conflict (patient uncertainty in decision making) during the decision-making process. METHODS This phase 3 randomized controlled trial assessed effects of a PEGI in women without active breast cancer undergoing delayed PMBR, or prophylactic mastectomy with immediate PMBR. Both groups underwent routine education before consultation. In addition, the intervention group underwent a PEGI composed of presentations from a plastic surgeon and nurse, a value clarification exercise, and shared experiences from PMBR patients before the consultation with the plastic surgeon. Before and 1-week after consultation, outcome measures were assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the BREAST-Q. RESULTS Of the 219 women deemed eligible, a total of 156 women were recruited and randomized. Treatment fidelity was 96% and retention was 88%. At baseline, there were no significant differences in terms of demographic or clinical status, knowledge, state-trait anxiety, and decisional conflict. Patient knowledge about PMBR improved in both groups; however, the degree of knowledge attainment was significantly greater in the PEGI group (24.5% improvement in the intervention group compared with 13.5% in the routine education group, P < 0.001). The reduction in decisional conflict from baseline to follow-up was greater in the intervention group compared with the routine education; however, the difference only approached significance (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS The provision of a preconsultation educational group intervention has been shown to significantly close the knowledge gap on PMBR in patients seeking delayed breast reconstruction or prophylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction compared with routine education alone.

Many women with early-onset breast cancer experience adverse psychological sequelae which impact on their quality of life. We sought to correlate levels of anxiety and cancer-related distress in women with breast cancer shortly after surgery and one year after treatment with the estimated risk of death.We studied 596 women with Stage I to III breast cancer. For each woman we estimated the five-year risk of death based on SEER data from 2010 to 2019. For each woman we measured anxiety and cancer-related distress levels shortly after surgery and one year later.The mean estimated five-year survival was 95%. At one week post-surgery, 59% of women had a clinically significant level of anxiety and 74% had a clinically significant level of cancer-related distress. There was no correlation between the objective risk of death and the level of anxiety or distress, at one week or at one year.Many women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancers experience significant levels of anxiety and distress. The emotional response to a breast cancer diagnosis is not related to the risk of death per se and other factors should be explored.

UNSTRUCTURED Recently, cases of patients recording clinical encounters without the physician's knowledge have been reported, raising ethical and legal questions. No study to date has examined surgeon's and trainee's attitudes towards this practice. An anonymous online survey was developed and administered to surgeons and trainees in a large academic department of surgery. The responses between the surgeons and trainees were then compared. There were a total of 114 responses (response rate of 12.6%). Attitudes on the utility of recording clinical encounters varied. When comparing surgeons to trainees, 22% of surgeons disagreed that memory aide alone was sufficient when discussing difficult information while only 5.3% of trainees (p

The goal of this study is to evaluate the frequency and imaging features of lobular neoplasia (LN) diagnosed on MRI-guided biopsy, determine the upgrade rate to malignancy, and assess for any features that may be associated with an upgrade on surgical excision. Research ethical board approved the review of consecutive patients with MRI-detected LN between January 2009 and December 2018 with differentiation between pure LN and LN with associated other high-risk lesions. The final outcome was determined by final pathology results from surgical excision or 24 months of follow-up. Appropriate statistical tests were used. Out of 1250 MRI-guided biopsies performed, 76 lesions (6%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort. Of the 76 lesions, 54 (71%) were pure LN while the rest had coexistent high-risk lesion. Non-mass enhancement (NME) was the most common lesion type (62, 82%). Fifty-nine lesions (78%) were surgically excised, the other 17 had benign follow-up. Overall, 8 lesions (11%) were upgraded to malignancy on final pathology. Malignant outcome was associated with larger lesion size (5.5 versus 1.9 cm, P

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of rapid genetic testing (RGT) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis on treatment choices. Bilateral mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation offers a reduction in the risk of contralateral breast cancer. It is unclear whether offering RGT at the time of breast cancer diagnosis has an impact on women’s surgical decision-making. Women with breast cancer diagnosed between June 2013 and May 2018 were recruited from four academic health sciences centers in Toronto, Canada. The participants completed a questionnaire before genetic testing, then one week and one year after disclosure of the genetic test result. Before surgery, RGT was performed. Diagnostic, pathologic, and treatment data were compared between those with and those without a BRCA mutation. The study enrolled 1007 women who consented to RGT. The mean age of the participants was 46.3 years, and the median time to result disclosure was 10 days. A BRCA mutation was found in 6% of the women. The women with a BRCA mutation were significantly more likely to elect for bilateral mastectomy than the women without a BRCA mutation (p

Summary Surgeons are frequently perceived by medical students to be uncompassionate, resolute and individualistic. Surgical education often prioritizes teaching and learning approaches that perpetuate these perceptions. In other specialties, engaging patients in education has shown promise in refocusing attention from the technical and procedural aspects of care toward the humanistic and social aspects. Despite proven favourable outcomes for both patients and students in many clinical areas, a "patient as teacher" approach to surgical education has yet to be adopted widely in Canada. A patient as teacher program was developed for surgical clerks at the University of Toronto with the goal of emphasizing the humanity of the patient, the psychosocial impact of a surgical diagnosis of breast cancer on patients and their families, and the social and humanistic roles for surgeons in providing patient-centred care. We report on the program's development process and pilot session.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer. There is wide variation in radiation therapy (RT) practice and limited data describing locoregional relapse (LRR) after NAC. We hypothesized a low LRR risk with modern NAC, surgery, and RT and aimed to elucidate patterns of LRR and predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients.Data from 416 patients with stage II/III breast cancer treated between 2008 and 2015 with NAC, surgery, and adjuvant RT were reviewed retrospectively. DFS and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The LRR rate was estimated using the cumulative incidence function, treating death as a competing risk. Multivariable survival analysis was performed using Cox regression.Median follow-up was 4.7 years. Most patients had cT2/3 (74%) cN1 (61%) disease and underwent mastectomy (75%) and axillary dissection (84%). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 22% of patients. There were 27 LRRs (including 4 isolated LRRs) and 89 distant failures. Two patients developed LRR 2 months after surgery, before adjuvant RT. LRR could be mapped in 23 patients: most (20) recurred within the RT field; 1 in- and out-of-field; and 2 out-of-field. Five-year LRR, DFS, and OS were 6.4%, 77%, and 90%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio [HR] 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-4.47; P.001), stage III disease (HR 1.72; 95% CI, 1.11-2.69; P = .016), and non-pCR (HR 4.76; 95% CI 2.13-10.0; P.001) were associated with poor DFS and OS (HR 4.13 [95% CI, 2.21-7.72; P.001]; HR 1.94 [95% CI, 1.001-3.75; P = .049]; and HR 2.38 [95% CI, 0.98-5.88; P = .055], respectively).Patients with breast cancer treated with modern NAC, surgery, and RT have a low 5-year LRR risk, with the majority occurring in-field. Triple-negative subtype, stage III disease, and non-pCR were associated with inferior DFS and OS.

Patients with genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer are eligible for risk-reduction surgery. Surgical morbidity of risk-reduction mastectomy (RRM) with concurrent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is unknown. Outcomes in these patients were compared to patients undergoing RRM without BSO using a large multi-institutional database. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeon’s National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2007–2016 datasets, comparing postoperative morbidity between patients undergoing RRM with patients undergoing RRM with concurrent BSO. Patients with genetic susceptibility to breast/ovarian cancer undergoing risk-reduction surgery were identified. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative major morbidity. Secondary outcomes included surgical site infections, reoperations, readmissions, length of stay, and venous thromboembolic events. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of postoperative morbidity and the adjusted effect of concurrent BSO on morbidity. Of the 5470 patients undergoing RRM, 149 (2.7%) underwent concurrent BSO. The overall rate of major morbidity and postoperative infections was 4.5% and 4.6%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative major morbidity (4.5% vs 4.7%, p = 0.91) or any of the secondary outcomes between patients undergoing RRM without BSO vs. those undergoing RRM with concurrent BSO. Multivariable analysis showed Body Mass Index (OR 1.05; p

Postoperative complication rates for elderly women undergoing breast cancer surgery have not been well studied. We describe the postoperative complication rates of elderly (≥ 70 years) women with breast cancer and compare them with young (40–69 years) women. Data were extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2004–2014). We included women with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery. Outcomes were 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality (complications), which were compared between young and elderly women. Morbidity was categorized using the Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) clusters. We identified 100,037 women of which 26.7% were elderly. Compared to young women, elderly women were more likely to have more comorbidities and undergo breast-conserving surgery, but less likely to undergo lymph node surgery, breast reconstruction, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. While the 30-day overall morbidity rate was not significantly different between young and elderly women (3.9 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.2), elderly women did have significantly higher rates of pulmonary, cardiac (arrest and myocardial infarction), venous thromboembolic, and neurological morbidity. Specific morbidities that showed significantly lower rates among elderly women included wound disruption and deep and organ space surgical site infection. Any cause death was significantly higher in elderly compared to young women (0.2 vs. 0.05%, p

Background. Text messaging has become ubiquitous and is being increasingly used within the health care system. The purpose of this study was to understand texting practices for clinical communication among staff surgeons at a large academic institution. Methods. Staff surgeons in 4 subspecialties (vascular, plastics, urology, and general surgery) were surveyed electronically. Results. A total of 62 surgeons from general surgery (n = 33), vascular surgery (n = 6), plastic surgery (n = 13), and urology (n = 10) completed the study (response rate 30%). When conveying urgent patient-related information, staff surgeons preferred directly calling other staff surgeons (61.5%) and trainees (58.8%). When discussing routine patient information, staff surgeons used email to reach other staff surgeons (54.9%) but preferred texting (62.7%) for trainees. The majority of participants used texting because it is fast (65.4%), convenient (69.2%) and allows transmitting information to multiple recipients simultaneously (63.5%). Most felt that texting enhances patient care (71.5%); however, only half believed that it enhanced trainees’ educational experiences. The majority believed that texting identifiable patient information breaches patient confidentiality. Conclusions. Our data showed high adoption of text messaging for clinical communication among surgeons, particularly with trainees. The majority of surgeons acknowledge security concerns inherent in texting for patient care. Existing mobile communication platforms fail to meet the needs of academic surgeons. Further research should include guidelines related to texting in clinical practice, educational implications of texting, and technologies to better meet the needs of clinicians working in an academic surgical settings.

The armamentarium of the modern breast surgeon includes the time-tested procedures of modified radical mastectomy and lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy with postoperative radiation, but has evolved to include several options that produce excellent oncologic endpoints and improved cosmesis. These options include skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction as well as oncoplastic procedures that allow larger excisions and better postoperative breast shape. This article provides an overview of these modern surgical approaches for breast cancer treatment.

There have been recent reports in the breast imaging literature of unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. It is unclear whether the reactive lymphadenopathy may impact the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure. In this article, we provide guidelines regarding the timing of the COVID-19 vaccine and breast cancer surgery which were formulated after a review of the available literature and in consultation with infectious disease specialists.

We sought to examine the safety of same-day breast reconstructive (BR) surgery.An analysis of the American College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) files was performed. Patients undergoing BR for breast cancer were examined, excluding those with high-risk co-morbidities or concurrent surgery. A propensity score was calculated and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the difference in 30-day complications between those undergoing SDS versus longer hospital stay.The study consisted of 21,539 patients; 17,449 had implant and 4090 had autologous breast reconstruction. 1195 (5.5%) underwent SDS, whereas 20,344 (94.5%) were admitted at least overnight. On unadjusted analysis, the rate of post-operative complications was nearly three times higher in those admitted compared to those undergoing SDS (6.7% vs. 2.5%; p 0.001). On propensity score adjusted multivariable regression there was no significant difference in complications amongst those undergoing SDS versus staying in hospital (OR 1.4 (95%CI: 0.9, 2.2)).These results suggest that admitting BR patients does not prevent short-term complications and same day BR surgery is safe when co-morbidities are accounted for.

Gender preference among patients seeking medical care is an issue that is not well understood. It warrants exploration, particularly for patients undergoing sensitive physical exams. In a recent IJHPR article, Groutz et al. reported a survey study that explored patient preferences in selecting a breast surgeon. They found that a third of patients preferred a female surgeon for their breast examination. However, surgical ability was the primary factor in selecting a surgeon for their breast surgery. This commentary discusses these findings in the context of patient-centered care and issues of gender equality in medical education. Gender equality is considered an important societal movement in achieving human rights for everyone based on their ability, rather than their gender and opportunity. This commentary argues that the goal of gender equality is why women should be encouraged to enter surgical professions, recognizing that patient preferences will be shaped by societal norms. Gender preferences for the performance of sensitive physical examinations by some patients are likely multifactorial and they warrant more exploration to deliver ideal patient centered care.

Women continue to be underrepresented in academic anesthesiology, especially in leadership positions. Possible reasons for this gender disparity include family responsibilities, inadequate mentorship, lack of desire for leadership, the leaky pipeline effect (i.e., attrition of women physicians over the course of their career trajectories), and discrimination. Our objective was to understand the lived experiences of Canadian anesthesiologists in leadership positions.In this constructivist grounded theory-inspired study, we used purposeful sampling to identify women anesthesiologists in leadership positions at one Canadian institution. Each participant underwent a one-on-one semi-structured interview of 40-60 min in length, sampling until theoretical saturation was reached. We included questions about the participant's practice setting, influences on their career, and advice the participant would provide to other women in leadership. We used an iterative approach to theoretical sampling and data analysis. The audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were transcribed and coded. NVivo12 was used for open and axial coding, and cross-referencing.Eight women anesthesiologists were recruited and interviewed. Our iterative process identified four interconnected themes: difficulty internalizing a leadership identity, identifying systemic barriers and biases, dissonance between agentic traits and communal social gender roles, and mentorship as shaping lived experiences. Participants consistently expressed experiencing discrimination, articulated barriers related to family responsibilities and ingrained societal expectations, and discussed how typical leadership traits are applied differently to women and men. Women perceived themselves as more compassionate and communicative than men. Despite these traits, these women have expressed barriers to obtaining mentorship.We identified consistent interconnected themes among the experiences of our sample of women anesthesiologists in academic leadership and found that academic anesthesiology is a gendered profession as experienced by these women leaders. Further research should focus on strategies to remove barriers to participation in academic anesthesiology for women.RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Les femmes continuent d’être sous-représentées en anesthésiologie académique, et tout particulièrement dans les positions de leadership. Parmi les raisons expliquant cette disparité entre les sexes, citons les responsabilités familiales, un mentorat inadapté, le manque de désir de leadership, l’effet de tuyau percé (soit l’attrition des femmes médecins au cours de leur parcours professionnel) et la discrimination. Notre objectif était de comprendre les expériences vécues par les anesthésiologistes canadiennes en position de leadership. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude inspirée de la théorie ancrée constructiviste (‘constructivist grounded theory’), nous avons utilisé un échantillonnage ciblé afin d’identifier les femmes anesthésiologistes en position de leadership dans un établissement canadien. Chaque participante a pris part à un entretien semi-structuré privé de 40-60 minutes, soit jusqu’à atteindre une saturation théorique. Nous avons inclus des questions concernant le cadre de pratique des participantes, les influences sur leur carrière, et les conseils qu’elles donneraient à d’autres femmes en position de leadership. Nous avons utilisé une approche itérative pour l’échantillonnage théorique et l’analyse de données. Un enregistrement sonore des entretiens semi-structurés a été réalisé pour être ensuite retranscrit et codé. Le progiciel NVivo12 a été utilisé pour le codage ouvert et axial ainsi que pour le référencement croisé. RéSULTATS: Huit femmes anesthésiologistes ont été recrutées et interviewées. Notre processus itératif nous a permis d’identifier quatre thèmes interconnectés : la difficulté d’internaliser une identité de leader, l’identification d’obstacles et de biais systémiques, la dissonance entre l’agentivité individuelle et les rôles de genre socialement construits, et le mentorat en tant que formatif des expériences vécues. Les participantes ont toutes exprimé ressentir de la discrimination, elles ont articulé des obstacles liés aux responsabilités familiales et aux attentes sociétales enracinées, et ont expliqué comment les caractéristiques typiques de leadership étaient appliquées différemment selon le sexe. Les femmes se percevaient comme étant plus empathiques et communicatives que les hommes. Malgré ces traits de caractère, ces femmes ont exprimé qu’il existait des obstacles à l’obtention de mentorat. CONCLUSION: Nous avons identifié plusieurs thèmes interconnectés récurrents parmi les expériences de notre échantillonnage de femmes anesthésiologistes dans des positions de leadership académique et observé que l’anesthésiologie en milieu académique est une profession genrée, comme l’ont ressenti ces femmes leaders. Les recherches futures devraient mettre l’accent sur des stratégies visant à déjouer les obstacles à la participation des femmes en anesthésiologie académique.

Alloplastic breast reconstruction is safe in well-selected older women. The impact of timing of surgery on complication rates is unknown. This study aimed to determine the immediate (30-day) postoperative complication rates of older women who underwent immediate (IBR) and delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) with alloplastic techniques.The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was used to identify women ≥70 years old with in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent either IBR or DBR (2005-2016). Outcomes included 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality.A total of 2,085 older women underwent alloplastic breast reconstruction of which 90% and 10% were IBR and DBR, respectively. Both groups had similar median age, body mass index, and frequency of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and steroid use. Tumors were mainly invasive in the IBR group (83.5%) and in situ in the DBR group (83.3%). IBR had significantly longer operative times (median 154 min vs 98 min, p 0.0001), but equal length of stay (median 3 days vs 3 days, p = 0.1). The 30-day overall morbidity (medical or surgical complication) rate was significantly higher in the IBR group (7.5% vs 1.0%, p 0.0004). Women with IBR were significantly more likely to develop infectious complications (6% vs 1%, p = 0.002). Cardiac/transfusion, pulmonary, thromboembolic, renal, and neurological morbidity rates were equal between groups. Thirty-day mortality rates were similar across both groups (IBR: 0.05% vs DBR: 0%, p = 0.74).While overall thirty-day postoperative complication rates in older women who undergo breast reconstruction were low, there were higher rates of infectious complications in the IBR cohort. The risks and benefits of alloplastic breast reconstruction should be discussed with older women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND The rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) are increasing in women with breast cancer. Previous retrospective research has examined clinical and demographic predictors of the uptake of CPM. However, to the authors' knowledge, there has been very little prospective research to date that has examined psychosocial functioning prior to breast cancer surgery to determine whether psychosocial functioning predicts uptake of CPM. The current study was conducted to evaluate demographic, clinical, and psychosocial predictors of the uptake of CPM in women with unilateral breast cancer without a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS Women with unilateral non-BRCA-associated breast cancer completed questionnaires prior to undergoing breast cancer surgery. Participants completed demographic and psychosocial questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, cancer-related distress, optimism/pessimism, breast satisfaction, and quality of life. Pathological and surgical data were collected from medical charts. RESULTS A total of 506 women consented to participate, 112 of whom (22.1%) elected to undergo CPM. Age was found to be a significant predictor of CPM, with younger women found to be significantly more likely to undergo CPM compared with older women (P

e18551 Background: Racial disparities in breast cancer are well established. However, there is a paucity of literature assessing the interaction of patient, socioeconomic, and community factors on outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of race/ ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance status on disease presentation, access to care, and survival in breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Hispanic patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in the SEER cancer registry between 2007 and 2016. Multivariable binary logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 382,975 patients were identified; 289,074 (75.5%) NHW, 45,821 (12.0%) NHB, and 48,080 (12.6%) Hispanic patients. On multivariate analysis (see table), NHB (OR 1.18, 95%CI: 1.15-1.20) and Hispanic (OR 1.20, 95%CI: 1.17-1.22) patients were more likely to present with higher stage disease than NHW patients. There was an increased likelihood of not undergoing primary resection in NHB (OR 1.56, 95%CI: 1.49-1.65) and Hispanic (OR 1.41, 95%CI: 1.34-1.48) patients compared to NHWs. Similarly, NHB and Hispanic patients had increased odds of not undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy (OR 1.07, 95%CI: 1.03-1.11 and OR 1.60, 95%CI 1.54-1.66, respectively). NHB patients had increased hazard for all-cause mortality (HR: 1.13, 95%CI 1.10-1.16) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.20, 95%CI 1.16-1.24). All-cause mortality increased across SES categories (lower SES: HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.30-1.37, middle SES: HR 1.20, 95%CI 1.17-1.23) in NHBs. Conclusions: This population-based analysis confirms worse disease presentation, access to surgical therapy, and survival across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors. These disparities were compounded across worsening SES, suggesting structural racism may partly account for our findings.[Table: see text]

568 Background: In breast cancer, clinicians aim to improve survival while patients value quality of life. We aim to delineate the impact of patient, tumour and treatment factors on psychosocial outcomes after treatment. Methods: A prospective cohort of women with unilateral stage I-III breast cancer were recruited at University Health Network in Toronto, Canada between 2014-2017. Validated questionnaires (BREAST-Q, Impact of Event, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scales) were completed pre-operatively, and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Change in psychosocial scores over time by surgical procedure was assessed using linear mixed models, controlling for age, pathologic stage, hormone (HR) and HER2 receptor, and treatments. Predictors of psychosocial outcomes at 12 months were assessed using multivariable linear regression models. P values

Most patients undergoing significant breast cancer surgery stay in hospital postoperatively. We sought to determine whether there was a difference in complication rates among patients undergoing same-day surgery (SDS) versus overnight or inpatient stay. Analysis of the American College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant user files was performed. Patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection between 2005 and 2012 were examined (high-risk comorbidities and concurrent surgery were excluded). Thirty-day postoperative morbidity was analyzed. Multivariable regression was performed identifying independent predictors of complications. The final population consisted of 40,575 patients; 8365 had SDS, 23,252 stayed overnight, and 8958 stayed in hospital longer postoperatively. Those admitted to hospital were older, more obese, had higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, medical comorbidities, or had bilateral surgery. The overall 30-day morbidity was 4.7 %. On univariate analysis, patients undergoing SDS had significantly lower 30-day morbidity (2.4 %) compared with overnight (3.9 %) or inpatient stay (8.8 %) (p

Background The purpose of this study was to explore career satisfaction and advancement for women in academic surgery. Methods A 48-item web-based survey was emailed to women surgeons in academic centers across Canada, exploring career advancement, family planning, mentorship, discrimination, and career satisfaction. Results The survey response rate was 38% (81 of 212); 18% of participants felt they experienced gender discrimination in medical school, 36% in residency, 12% in fellowship, and 41% as staff surgeons. More than half felt that their gender had played a role in the career challenges they faced. Responses to open-ended questions suggested that many surgeons struggled to balance their academic careers with family life. Despite this, participants rated their career satisfaction very highly. Conclusions There remain ongoing challenges for women in academic surgery including lack of gender equality, appropriate mentorship, and accommodations for surgeons with families. Continued advancement of women in academic surgery is dependent on addressing these concerns.