Search

Objective: This study investigated why certain embedded performance validity indicators (EVIs) are prone to higher false-positive rates (FPRs) in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) evaluations. The first aim was to establish the relationship between FPRs and 15 EVIs derived from six cognitive tests when used independently and together among adults with ADHD who have valid test performance. The second aim was to determine which specific EVIs increase the FPRs in this population., Method: Participants were 517 adult ADHD referrals with valid neurocognitive test performance as determined by multiple performance validity tests and established empirical criteria. FPRs were defined by the proportion of participants who scored below an empirically established EVI cutoff with ≥0.90 specificity., Results: EVIs derived from two of the six tests exhibited unacceptably high FPRs (>10%) when used independently, but the total FPR decreased to 8.1% when the EVIs were aggregated. Several EVIs within a sustained attention test were associated with FPRs around 11%. EVIs that did not include demographically adjusted cutoffs, specifically for race, were associated with higher FPRs around 14%. Conversely, FPRs did not significantly differ based on whether EVIs included timed versus untimed, verbal versus nonverbal, or graphomotor versus non-graphomotor components, nor whether they had raw versus standardized cut scores., Conclusions: Findings suggest that practitioners should consider both the type of test from which an EVI is derived and the aggregate number of EVIs employed to minimize the FPRs in ADHD evaluations. Findings also indicate that more nuanced approaches to validity test selection and development are needed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Individuals with ADHD symptoms are at an increased risk of lifetime trauma exposure. However, research has yet to fully examine whether symptoms of ADHD function as a temporal risk factor for experiencing trauma and specific mechanisms that may explain the association between symptoms of ADHD and trauma exposure. Two constructs that may account for the relation between ADHD symptoms and trauma are deviant peer association and neighborhood disadvantage. The present study sought to 1) elucidate the temporal nature of ADHD symptoms and exposure to trauma and 2) examine whether peer deviancy and/or neighborhood disadvantage mediate the relation between childhood ADHD symptoms and subsequent trauma exposure across a 20-year longitudinal cohort study. Participants (N = 616) were predominantly Black/African American (86%; Male n = 389) from an urban school district. Using structural equation modeling, total trauma exposures during young adulthood (Years 17-20) were regressed on parent- and teacher-rated ADHD symptoms in Grade 1 (Year 1). A significant indirect path from ADHD symptoms to trauma exposure through deviant peer affiliation (Year 16) indicated that having childhood ADHD symptoms predicted deviant peer affiliation 16 years later, which in turn predicted greater exposures to traumatic events during young adulthood, controlling for neighborhood disadvantage. Neighborhood disadvantage was not a significant mediator when accounting for peer deviancy. Taken together, findings contribute to a limited body of research that utilizes a prospective design to examine the association between childhood ADHD symptoms and trauma exposure in young adulthood among Black/African American youth. Potential targets for intervention are proposed., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)